Transcript
Page 1: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Systematic approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon

capture and sequestration

Marlo GaweyGIS for Water Resources

November 22, 2011

World Resources Institute

Page 2: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

CO2

CO2

CO2 CO2CO2

CO2

CO2CO2

CO2

CO2

CO2

CO2

CO2

CO2

CO2CO2CO2

Motivationhttp://indianapublicmedia.org

Page 3: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Carbon Capture & Sequestration (CCS)

http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/ccs/how-ccs-works

Page 4: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Current Carbon Capture and Sequestration Projects

http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/map

Page 5: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Carbon Capture and Sequestration in Texas

http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/map

Page 6: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

1. Correct pressure and temp.2. Porous3. Permeable4. Fluid trapping mechanism

IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme

Page 7: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Subsurface Layers of Rock to Store Fluids

Biddle, K.T. and Wielchowsky, C.C., 1994, “Ch. 13: Hydrocarbon Traps,” Magoon, L.B. and W.G. Dow, eds, AAPG Memoir 60.

Page 8: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Major Enhanced Oil Recovery Fields in TX

Data from BEG Oil Atlas courtesy of C. Breton

Page 9: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme

Page 10: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Sources

Ethylene plants Hydrogen plants Iron & steel refineries Oil & gas refineries Ammonia plants Cement plants Power plants (coal)

Page 11: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Major US CO2 Producers

Data from USGS, IEA, TNRIS courtesy of C. Breton

Page 12: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Major TX CO2 Producers

Page 13: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Source-Sink Matching

1. Minimize distance from source to sink2. Minimize distance to CO2 pipelines, if possible3. Avoid sensitive areas

– Protected aquifers– State & national parks– High density population areas

http://upload.wikimedia.org

Page 14: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Goals

1. Create unique maps for qualitative source-sink matching

2. Use some spatial analysis to tease out prospective source-sink matches

Page 15: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Major TX Aquifers & Reservoirs

Data from TNRIS and BEG

Page 16: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

TX Aquifers & Protected Areas

Data from BEG Oil Atlas courtesy of C. Breton

Page 17: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

1) Merge protected areas

Page 18: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

2) Select sources & sinks within 10 km of protected areas

Page 19: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Result

227 Sources2973 Sinks

296 Sources3207 Sinks

Page 20: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

CO2 Pipelines in & around TX

Page 21: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

… using the same method as before

25 km zone

Page 22: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Result

705 reservoirs10 CO2 producers

Page 23: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Nearest Sink to Sources

Page 24: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

What’s Next?Create a population density map…

…And use it to screen for Sources & Sinks

Page 25: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

Steps:

1. Download block shapefiles with population and housing unit counts in them http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2010/pophu.html

Population count in each housing unit

These polygons describe housing units

Page 26: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

3) Consolidate data

HUGE data set:914,231 polygons!

Page 27: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

2) Calculate areas of blocks

Page 28: Systematic  approach to source-sink matching for geological carbon capture and  sequestration

3) Using “Field Calculator” in Attribute Table, calculate population density

4) Export the population density data to a new feature class and map it!


Top Related