Download - Summary of Aarhus workshop
![Page 1: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Summary of Aarhus workshop
Some selected results
![Page 2: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Intrinsic numerical accuracy
• Compare models computed with a given code and given parameters
• Vary number of meshpoints
• Vary number of timesteps
![Page 3: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35
Test effect of no. of meshpoints:
( N = 1200) – (N = 600)
ASTEC
![Page 4: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35
Test effect of no. timesteps:
( Nt = 24) – (Nt = 13)
( ymax = 0.025) - ( ymax = 0.05)
ASTEC
![Page 5: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.3
1.2 M¯, Mc = 0.1 M¯
Test effect of no. of meshpoints:
( N = 600) – (N = 1200)
ASTEC
![Page 6: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.3
1.2 M¯, Mc = 0.1 M¯
Test effect of no. of meshpoints:
( N = 600) – (N = 1200)
ASTEC
![Page 7: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.3
1.2 M¯, Mc = 0.1 M¯
Test effect of no. timesteps:
( Nt = 277) – (Nt = 546)
( ymax = 0.05) - ( ymax = 0.025)
ASTEC
![Page 8: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.5
2.0 M¯, Xc = 0.01,
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
Test effect of no. of meshpoints:
( N = 600) – (N = 1200)
ASTEC
![Page 9: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.5
2.0 M¯, Xc = 0.01,
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
Test effect of no. of meshpoints:
( N = 600) – (N = 1200)
ASTEC
![Page 10: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.5
2.0 M¯, Xc = 0.01,
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
Test effect of no. of meshpoints:
( N = 600) – (N = 1200)
ASTEC
![Page 11: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.5
2.0 M¯, Xc = 0.01,
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
Test effect of no. of timesteps:
( Nt = 208) – (Nt = 402)
ASTEC
![Page 12: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.5
2.0 M¯, Xc = 0.01,
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
Test effect of no. of timesteps:
( Nt = 208) – (Nt = 402)
ASTEC
![Page 13: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
3He in equilibrium
Case 1.5
2.0 M¯, Xc = 0.01,
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
Test effect of no. of timesteps:
( Nt = 208) – (Nt = 402)
ASTEC
![Page 14: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35,
Test effect of no. of timesteps:
( t = 2000 yr) – ( t = 1800 yr)
Continuous: ln T
Dotted: ln p
Dashed: ln
Dot-dashed: ln c2
3dot-dashed: ln 1
Long-dashed: ln L
Thick continuous: ln X
TGEC
![Page 15: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35,
Test effect of no. of timesteps:
( t = 2000 yr) – ( t = 2200 yr)
Continuous: ln T
Dotted: ln p
Dashed: ln
Dot-dashed: ln c2
3dot-dashed: ln 1
Long-dashed: ln L
Thick continuous: ln X
TGEC
![Page 16: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35,
Continuous: ln T
Dotted: ln p
Dashed: ln
Dot-dashed: ln c2
3dot-dashed: ln 1
Long-dashed: ln L
Thick continuous: ln X
TGEC
Test effect of no. of timesteps:
( t = 2000 yr) – ( t = 2200 yr)
![Page 17: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Physics comparisons
Evaluate physics (EOS, opacity, energy-generation rate, rate of composition change, …, at fixed T, , Xi
Examples: comparing CESAM and CLES with ASTEC, showing, e.g.,
ln(ASTEC(CESAM, TCESAM, …)/CESAM)
![Page 18: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CESAM, Case 1.1
Note: consistency problems in OPAL.
See also Boothroyd & Sackman (2003; ApJ 583, 1004)
In ASTEC implementation:
Directly from OPAL: p, rad, , , 1
cp = cv + p 2/( T )
![Page 19: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
CESAM, Case 1.1
![Page 20: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
CESAM, Case 1.1
![Page 21: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
CESAM, Case 1.1
![Page 22: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
CLES, Case 1.1
![Page 23: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
CLES, Case 1.1
![Page 24: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
CLES, Case 1.1
![Page 25: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CLES, Case 1.1
![Page 26: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Main project: compare different codes
• Evolution tracks
• Global parameters for selected models
• Detailed comparison of structure
• Comparison of oscillation frequencies
![Page 27: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
CLES and ASTEC
Case 1.3
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.73, Z0 = 0.01
MHeC = 0.1 M¯
![Page 28: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
CLES and ASTEC
Case 1.3
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.73, Z0 = 0.01
MHeC = 0.1 M¯
Mc/M
Xc
![Page 29: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
CLES, CESAM and ASTEC
Case 1.5n
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72, Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
No overshoot
![Page 30: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
CLES, CESAM and ASTEC
Case 1.5n
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72, Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
No overshoot
![Page 31: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
CLES, CESAM and ASTEC
Case 1.5n
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72, Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
![Page 32: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
CLES, CESAM and ASTEC
Case 1.5n
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72, Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
![Page 33: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Detailed model comparison
• Global quantities
• Differences at fixed m/M, plotted against m/M or r/R
• Differences at fixed r/R might be more illustrative for effects on oscillations (but not used yet)
![Page 34: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Hydrogen abundance
X
0.9 M¯
X0 = 0.7
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.35
![Page 35: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35CLES – CESAM2
![Page 36: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35CLES – CESAM2
![Page 37: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35CLES – CESAM0
![Page 38: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35CLES – CESAM0
![Page 39: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35CESAM2 – CESAM0
![Page 40: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35ASTEC – CESAM0
![Page 41: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35ASTEC – CESAM0
![Page 42: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35ASTEC – CESAM0
![Page 43: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Case 1.1
0.9 M¯, Xc = 0.35STAROX – CESAM0
![Page 44: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Hydrogen abundance
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.7
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.69
X
![Page 45: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.7
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.69
CLES – CESAM0Case 1.2
![Page 46: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.7
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.69
CLES – CESAM0Case 1.2
![Page 47: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.7
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.69
CLES – CESAM0Case 1.2
![Page 48: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.7
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.69
STAROX – CESAM0Case 1.2
![Page 49: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.7
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.69
STAROX – CESAM0Case 1.2
![Page 50: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Hydrogen abundance
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.73
Z0 = 0.01
MHeC/M = 0.1
X
![Page 51: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.73
Z0 = 0.01
MHeC/M = 0.1
Case 1.3 ASTEC – CESAM2
![Page 52: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
1.2 M¯
X0 = 0.73
Z0 = 0.01
MHeC/M = 0.1
Case 1.3 ASTEC – CESAM2
![Page 53: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Hydrogen abundance
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
No overshoot
X
![Page 54: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
No overshoot
Case 1.5nSTAROX – CESAM2
![Page 55: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
No overshoot
Case 1.5nASTEC - STAROX
![Page 56: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Hydrogen abundance
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
Overshoot, 0.15 Hp
X
![Page 57: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
Case 1.5STAROX – CESAM2
![Page 58: Summary of Aarhus workshop](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56813def550346895da7c914/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
2.0 M¯
X0 = 0.72
Z0 = 0.02
Xc = 0.01
Overshoot 0.15 Hp
Case 1.5ASTEC – CESAM2