Transcript

Structural Health Monitoring: SMART STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY

Samir Mustapha | PhD BE (Hon I)

Vibration Based Method for Monitoring

of Infrastructure

Monitoring of Tunnels and Bridges

Overloading Vehicles

Monitoring of Pipelines

Development of Wireless/ Low Cost

Sensors

Failure Prediction

Fatigue and Corrosion

Technology Development & Integration

Ultrasonic Guided Wave and Monitoring

of Aerospace Structures

Carbon Fiber Reinforced Epoxy

Composite Sandwich Structures

Sensor Networks

Damage Detection Algorithms

Data Fusion

Finite Element Analysis: FEA

Structural Damage

Manufacturing

defect/lack of

quality control

Machining and

assembly

damage/

during

construction

Service and

maintenance

damage

Symptoms of Failure

• Changes in dynamic properties at low and high frequencies

– Modal data like frequency, shape, curvature, etc.

– Seismology like stress waves, etc.

• Changes in static properties

– Deformation

– Stiffness/compliance

• Changes in electrical and chemical properties

4

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM)

Mimic the human nervous

system

Integrated sensors

(PZT, FBG, SG,

Accelerometers etc..)

Report information in real time

Sensors could help prevent cracks from

developing into catastrophic failures

Indenter

Sandwich

Beam

Debonding

Composite Sandwich Structures

Debonding between the skin and the core reduces the

performance of composite sandwich structures.

6

Experiment Set-up

7

7

6

280 mm

560 mm

Artificial debonding TPF

(40mm×40mm) 56

0 mm

440 mm

1 2 3 4 5

13

12

11

10

9

14

15

8

16

x-direction

y-d

irec

tio

n

17

Sensor network

Quasi-isotropic configuration

[45, 0/90]s

Nomex honeycomb core 20.4

mm in thickness

7.5 sinusoidal cycles

Signals aqcuisition at 20.48 MHz

Data Fusion

8

Data fusion for intensity

Weight (Normal distribution)

Damage signature

Relative distance

Sensor Networks

9

Group I with 64 paths Group II with 26 paths

Correlation-Based Imaging: S0 Wave Mode

10

Constructed image for debonding in CF/EP sandwich panel using S0 mode (“x”

indicates the centre position of prediction).

Excitation frequency: 150 kHz

Case study: Finite Element Analysis

Interaction with de-bonding in sandwich panels

11

Excitation frequency of 150 kHz

De-bonding

S0 S0

Benchmark Inserting a de-bond Wave leakage

through thickness

Time series analysis: the framework

12

][tx ][ty

Data acquisition

Estimation of

characteristic quantity

of S for each state

: healthy state

: Fault A

: Fault B B

A

S

S

S

ˆ

ˆ

ˆ0System

(S)

Baseline Phase

System identification

][txu ][tyu

Data acquisition

Estimation of current

characteristics:

uS

System

(S)

Inspection phase

System identification

Fault detection

Fault identification &

estimation

The characteristic quantity S is:

• obtained as part of a time

series model

• reflecting the structural

dynamics

• sensitive to faults

Decision

making

Damage signature

1)(

)( 0 u

Steel Reinforced Concrete Arches:

Time Series Analysis

13

Intact specimen

Damaged specimen

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800

1

2

3

4

5

Envent ID

Healthy

Damaged

)(

)( 0

u

Damage Detection in Concrete Beams/

Welded Steel Pipes

14

Through thickness cracks

Wave propagation direction

T1= 0.125 ms

Steel rebar

Concrete

T1= 0.375 ms

Contact Details

15

Samir Mustapha BE, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Faculty of Engineering and Architecture

American University of Beirut

Tel: 961-1-350 000 ext 3445

Email: [email protected]


Top Related