![Page 1: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Strategic placement of compressors for future
mine developments
HG Brand
August 2012
![Page 2: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
Rustenburg Platinum Mine (RPM) consists of eight shafts supplied with air from six compressor houses
Mandate of the simulation:
1. Determine the best position of the compressors replacing the West 10 compressors
2. Reduce the system’s reliance on the VK-125 compressor
3. Determine whether Khusuleka 1 (Townlands) and Khusuleka 2 (Boschfontein) can be isolated
![Page 3: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Surface layout
![Page 4: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Simulation 1: Description
Aim: Verify accuracy at high flow rates The average flow profile for the air network is
determined The simulation is run to replicate the pressures
at the shafts These pressures are compared to the actual
pressures at the shafts
![Page 5: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Simulation 1: Results
![Page 6: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Simulation 2: Description
Aim: To alleviate the system’s reliance on the VK-125
West 10 compressor house is decommissioned The high risk pipe section from Siphumelele 3
(Bleskop), via West 10 to Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) is removed
Two BB Sulzer compressors are simulated at Khomanani 1 (Frank 1)
A GHH compressor is moved from West 10 to Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein) to replace the VK-125
![Page 7: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Simulation 2: Results
![Page 8: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Simulation 2: Summary
Average required flow at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein) is 107 Х 10³ m³/h
Peak flow can be 30 Х 10³ m³/h above average profile and the required flow can be as high as 137 Х 10³ m³/h
Available flow from two GHHs is 66 Х 10³ m³/h The available flow is too low and the VK-125
cannot be stopped
![Page 9: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Simulation 3: Description
Both GHHs and the VK-125 are started at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein)
Aim: Determine maximum pressure at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein)
![Page 10: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Simulation 3: Results
![Page 11: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Simulation 3: Summary
The pressure at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein) increases to 622 kPa at the compressor house while the pressure at the shaft is 605 kPa
The pressure rating of the pipes are 800 kPa
![Page 12: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Simulation 4-6: Description
With the VK-125 running - Determined how many additional BB Sulzers are required and where to position them
A BB Sulzer was placed at Thembalani 1 (Paardekraal), Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) and Khomanani 2 (Frank 2)
One GHH and the VK-125 was running at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein)
![Page 13: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Simulation 4-6: Results
![Page 14: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Simulation 4-6: Summary
Best position to place the BB Sulzer is at Khomanani 2 (Frank 2), followed by Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) and then Thembelani 1 (Paardekraal)
Flow spikes occur at Khusuleka 1 (Townlands) and Khomanani 2 (Frank 2)
To accommodate flow spikes it is suggested that the second BB Sulzer compressor be positioned at Khomanani 1 (Frank 1)
![Page 15: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Simulation 7-8: Description
Aim - Determine whether to place the two BB Sulzers in one or two compressor houses
Three simulations are run In all the simulations one GHH and the VK-125
is running at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein)
![Page 16: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Simulation 7-8: Description
Solution 1 - One compressor is placed at Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) and one at Khomanani 2 (Frank 2)
Solution 2 - Both compressors are placed at Khomanani 1 (Frank)
Solution 3 – Both GHH compressors at Siphumelele are running together with the VK-125
Compare to the existing system pressures
![Page 17: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Simulation 7-8: Results
![Page 18: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Simulation 7-8: Summary
Solution 3 is not viable Solution 1 offers the best option, followed by
solution 2. Solution 2 will be the preferred option In both solution 1 and 2 the flow to Khusuleka 1
(Townlands) is in excess of 10 000 m³/h This confirms that these shafts cannot be isolated
![Page 19: Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG Brand August 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a9a550346895dc8182f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Conclusion
The simulations indicated that the system relies too heavily on the VK-125 compressor
The best compressor placement was at Khomanani 1 (Frank 1)
Khusuleka 1 (Townlands) and Khusuleka 2 (Boschfontein) cannot be isolated from the rest of the air network.