Download - Somerville racism lawsuit
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
----------------------------------------------------------------------- RODNEY DORSEY, WADE HALL, JR., and TODD VANDERVOORT,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BOROUGH OF SOMERVILLE, ANTHONY HENDERSHOT, PETER HENDERSHOT, KEVIN SLUKA, and MICHAEL HALPERIN,
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
x:::::::::::x
Civil Action No. __________ COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Sarah Fern Meil 67 Bridge Street P.O. Box 145 Milford, NJ 08848 Phone: (908) 995-7320 Fax: (609) 228-4307 [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs
BROPHY & LENAHAN P.C.
Joseph Alexander Brophy, Esq. 2101 Pine Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 558-7600 (office) (215) 449-3376 (fax) [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs
Pro hac vice application to be filed
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 22 PageID: 1
2
COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs Rodney Dorsey (“Dorsey”), Wade Hall, Jr., (“Hall”), and Todd Vandervoort
(“Vandervoort”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their attorneys, Sarah Fern Meil,
Esq., and Brophy & Lenahan P.C., for their complaint against Defendants, the Borough of
Somerville (“Somerville”), Anthony Hendershot (“Tony Hendershot”), Peter Hendershot (“Pete
Hendershot”), Kevin Sluka (“Sluka”), and Michael Halperin (“Halperin”) (collectively,
“Defendants”), respectfully allege as follows:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. Plaintiffs, each of whom is an African-American employee of the Department of
Public Works in Somerville, New Jersey, have been subjected to a racially hostile work
environment that has spanned at least the last two decades.
2. As set forth in greater detail below, from the mid-to-late 1980’s until January
2014, Plaintiffs were routinely addressed by general foreman Anthony Hendershot (“Tony
Hendershot”) with numerous racial epithets, including “nigger,” “coon,” “moolie,” “monkey,”
“spook” and “jigaboo.” Tony Hendershot spoke to Plaintiffs in this manner on a regular basis,
and escalated this behavior when he became Plaintiffs’ supervisor in or about 2004 or 2005.
Tony Hendershot would also use this racist language regardless of who was in his vicinity,
including his brother and supervisor, Peter Hendershot (“Pete Hendershot”), the Superintendent
of Somerville’s Department of Public Works (“DPW”).
3. Somerville’s Administrator, Kevin Sluka (“Sluka”), has allowed a custom of
racially discriminatory behavior to flourish at DPW by displaying utter indifference both to Tony
Hendershot’s behavior and Pete Hendershot’s tolerance of that behavior. On multiple occasions,
from the beginning of Sluka’s term as Administrator in 2007, Sluka was made aware of the
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 2 of 22 PageID: 2
3
racially hostile work environment and had multiple opportunities to take remedial action. But
for years, Sluka did nothing, and the racial harassment continued unabated.
4. Only in January 2014, when Hall informed Sluka that he was in the process of
retaining an attorney, did Sluka take any action with respect to the racial discrimination that
Plaintiffs had been subject to for decades. Faced with the possibility of legal action, Somerville
hired an attorney to represent it in an investigation into the racial harassment. That investigation
took more than three months to complete and conclusively determined that Plaintiffs had been
subjected to a racially hostile working environment at the Somerville DPW for many years.
Despite that unequivocal finding, to date, Defendants have taken no action to remedy the
situation.
5. While Somerville’s attorney was purportedly investigating the hostile working
environment, Sluka’s assistant, Michael Halperin (“Halperin”), made several threats to Plaintiffs,
as well as threats to witnesses to the discrimination, in an effort to retaliate against Plaintiffs for
making a complaint and to obstruct the investigative process.
6. Because of the extreme and pervasive racist environment Plaintiffs were subjected
to for decades at DPW, and due to the utter indifference displayed to Plaintiffs’ abuse by
Somerville executives, Plaintiffs now bring this complaint against Defendants.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
7. The court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1331 because Plaintiffs allege a claim arising under federal law
8. This court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ state law claims pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 3 of 22 PageID: 3
4
9. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the parties
are domiciliaries of this district and most of the events giving rise to the claims alleged herein
occurred in this district.
PARTIES
10. Rodney Dorsey (“Dorsey”) is a resident of Somerville, NJ, and has been
employed by Somerville since 1985. Dorsey’s current position with Somerville is Parks
Foreman. Dorsey is African-American.
11. Wade Hall, Jr. (“Hall”) is a resident of Princeton, NJ, and has been employed by
Somerville since 1988. Hall currently works for the maintenance department at DPW. Hall is
African-American.
12. Todd Vandervoort (“Vandervoort”) is a resident of North Plainfield, NJ, and has
been employed by Somerville since 1986. Vandervoort’s current position with Somerville is
Sewers Foreman. Vandervoort is African-American.
13. The Borough of Somerville (“Somerville”) is a borough in Somerset County, New
Jersey.
14. Anthony Hendershot (“Tony Hendershot”) was the general foreman of DPW of
Somerville from in or about 2004-2005 through late January/early February 2014, when he
apparently retired. In his position as general foreman, Tony Hendershot was the direct
supervisor of Dorsey and Vandervoort, among others, and also had supervisory authority over
Hall. Prior to being promoted to general foreman, Tony Hendershot was a foreman of DPW, and
had been employed by Somerville since at least the 1980’s.
15. Peter Hendershot (“Pete Hendershot”) is currently the Superintendent of DPW of
Somerville, and is the supervisor of Dorsey, Hall, and Vandervoort, among others. Pete
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 4 of 22 PageID: 4
5
Hendershot is Tony Hendershot’s brother, and, until Tony Hendershot’s apparent retirement, was
his brother’s direct supervisor as well.
16. Kevin Sluka (“Sluka”) has been the Administrator and Clerk of Somerville since
2007. In his role as Administrator and Clerk, Sluka is ultimately the final decisionmaker in
charge of DPW, and Pete Hendershot reports directly to Sluka.
17. Michael Halperin (“Halperin”) is an employee of Somerville who reports directly
to Sluka. After Tony Hendershot’s retirement, Halperin was placed in DPW on an interim basis,
during which he exercised supervisory authority over Dorsey, Hall, and Vandervoort, among
others.
BACKGROUND
Long History of Overt Racism in Somerville
18. Since Plaintiffs were hired in the mid-to-late 1980’s, Somerville, and, in
particular, DPW, has been and continues to be a toxic racist environment for Plaintiffs and for
other African-American DPW employees.
19. The epicenter of the racist conduct directed at Plaintiffs, Tony Hendershot, served
as the direct supervisor of Plaintiffs upon his promotion to general foreman of DPW in or about
2004-2005. Tony Hendershot’s abuse of Plaintiffs began when Plaintiffs were hired in the mid-
to-late 1980’s, escalated once Tony Hendershot became Plaintiffs’ supervisor in or about 2004-
2005, and continued to early 2014, when he apparently retired.
20. Both before and during his supervisory position as general foreman, Tony
Hendershot would regularly refer to African-American employees of DPW, including Plaintiffs,
as “niggers,” “coons,” “spooks,” “moolies,”1 “monkeys” and “jigaboos.” He would directly
1 “Moolie” was apparently short for “moulinyan,” a derogatory term in Italian for blacks.
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 5 of 22 PageID: 5
6
address Plaintiffs and other DPW employees using these epithets, and would also refer to
Plaintiffs using these terms while in conversations with other DPW employees.
21. The racist behavior, however, was not limited to Tony Hendershot. For example,
around 1995, DPW employee Barry Hutchinson, who is Tony Hendershot’s brother-in-law, told
Dorsey that he hoped Dorsey’s home would burn down with his children inside. Hutchinson also
commented that he would “never work for a black man,” and told Dorsey that a “black man
would never be in charge in the Borough [of Somerville].”
22. The racist culture in Somerville even extended beyond DPW. For example, on
one occasion in the late 1980‘s or early 1990’s, Fire Chief Barry Van Horn, who is white, used a
public radio channel to ask for Hall and another African-American employee by referring to
them as his “aces of spades.” On a later occasion, a white dispatcher greeted Hall by saying,
“what’s up, nig?” .
23. Tony Hendershot consistently used his position of authority to abuse Plaintiffs
and other minority DPW employees. As a show of his power over them, Tony Hendershot
pretended to befriend Plaintiffs. For example, on several occasions, he invited Hall to his house
to socialize and play darts; during these gatherings, however, he would refer to Hall as “nigger.”
24. African-American employees of Somerville were frequently given less desirable
work than their white counterparts. For example, Plaintiffs and other African-American
employees were generally given manual labor assignments, as opposed to assignments involving
equipment. This was significant because in order to be promoted to foreman, a DPW employee
needed to pass equipment operating tests.
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 6 of 22 PageID: 6
7
Tony Hendershot Racially Abuses Plaintiffs From His New Position of General Foreman 25. In or about 2001, Dorsey was promoted to foreman of Somerville parks, and
Vandervoort was promoted to foreman of Somerville sewers. Upon hearing of Dorsey and
Vandervoort’s promotions, Tony Hendershot commented to Pete Hendershot and others that
Dorsey and Vandervoort “can’t make what I make” in terms of salary, despite the fact that all
three were DPW foremen.
26. In or about 2004 or 2005, the position of general foreman became open. Tony
Hendershot, Dorsey and Vandervoort were among the applicants. Of the applicants, Tony
Hendershot was chosen to become general foreman, a position in which he would report directly
to his brother, DPW Superintendent Pete Hendershot. Tony Hendershot also assumed
supervisory authority over Plaintiffs at this time.
27. In his position as general foreman and Plaintiffs’ supervisor, Tony Hendershot
escalated his racist abuse of Plaintiffs and other African-American employees whom he
supervised. Tony Hendershot’s abusive behavior would often be preceded and/or accompanied
with his consumption of alcoholic beverages while on the job.
28. The typical racial epithets used by Tony Hendershot to refer to Plaintiffs were
“nigger,” “monkey,” “coon,” “spook,” “moolie” or “jigaboo,” Tony Hendershot would typically
use such slurs, directed to or in the presence of Plaintiffs, on several occasions in a given month.
Tony Hendershot’s racist conduct was frequently witnessed by Pete Hendershot, who turned a
blind eye to his brother’s racial abuse of Plaintiffs.
29. When one of the Plaintiffs would do something on the job that pleased Tony
Hendershot, Tony Hendershot’s typical complement was, “you’re one of the smart ones.”
Plaintiffs understood “ones” to mean African-Americans. By contrast, when an African-
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 7 of 22 PageID: 7
8
American employee would do something that Tony Hendershot was dissatisfied with, he would
typically comment, “I haven’t met a smart one yet.” Tony Hendershot made such comments to
each of the Plaintiffs.
30. Another typical racist comment that Tony Hendershot would make to
Vandervoort had to do with where Vandervoort parked in the DPW lot. Tony Hendershot would
typically direct Vandervoort to the back, and comment, “that’s where you belong - in the back.”
31. On another occasion, Tony Hendershot said to Dorsey, “Abraham Lincoln done
freed you years ago and we’re still making fun of you.”
32. Tony Hendershot would also regularly invite his friends from the Fraternal Order
of Eagles to the DPW shop, where he and his friends would frequently make racist dialogue,
jokes, and gestures, often in front of and directed to Plaintiffs and other African-American DPW
employees.
33. For instance, Tony Hendershot and his friends would often salute each other using
the “Heil Hitler” gesture. Additionally, on many occasions, Plaintiffs heard Hendershot and his
friends making racist jokes, such as “Why do Black folks keep chickens in their backyard? To
teach them to walk.” Hendershot and his friends also routinely used racial slurs with regard to
African-Americans, such as “nigger,” “coon,” “moolie,” “monkey,” “spook,” and “jigaboo.”
34. Plaintiffs were not the only targets of Tony Hendershot’s racist behavior. Greg
Paremore, an African-American DPW employee who retired in late 2013, was also a frequent
subject of abuse. For example, Tony Hendershot would refer to Paremore as a “big fat black
nigger,” “black bastard” or “black asshole.”
35. Another target of Tony Hendershot’s abuse was Eddie Collazo, a Hispanic
employee of DPW. Tony Hendershot would typically refer to Collazo as “spic,” “wetback” or
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 8 of 22 PageID: 8
9
“Taco Bell,” refer to him and his family as being “off the boat” and tell him that “15 people live
in your house.”
36. Dorsey and Vandervoort found that, due to Tony Hendershot’s treatment of them,
they did not receive the level of respect as African-American foremen that was given to their
white counterparts. For instance, Dorsey and Vandervoort were discouraged from “writing up”
their white subordinates who committed workplace infractions, even though this was standard
practice before Dorsey and Vandervoort were foremen.
Early Efforts by Plaintiffs to Complain to Somerville Executives About Tony Hendershot
37. Even before Tony Hendershot was promoted to general foreman, Hall complained
to former administrator Ralph “Chick” Sternadori (“Sternadori”) about Tony Hendershot’s
mistreatment of him. Sternadori responded in disbelief, but told Hall that he “wanted to keep
everything in house.”
38. Also in the 2000’s, Hall complained to Pete Hendershot -- the DPW
Superintendent and Tony Hendershot’s immediate supervisor -- regarding his brother’s abusive
and racist behavior. Pete Hendershot asked Tony Hendershot to apologize to Hall, but the
abusive treatment continued nonetheless.
39. In 2006, Dorsey wrote two letters to Somerville administration reporting
discrimination in Somerville. In his first letter, dated April 26, 2006, Dorsey wrote to
Somerville’s Personnel Committee, questioning why a white peer was going to be granted a
salary adjustment that had been denied to Dorsey, and referred to this policy as “discriminating.”
Dorsey received no response to this letter.
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 9 of 22 PageID: 9
10
40. Later that year, on November 8, 2006, Dorsey wrote a letter to Mayor Brian
Gallagher (“Mayor Gallagher”) of Somerville, in which Dorsey complained that black foremen
were being treated worse than their white counterparts. Dorsey wrote, in pertinent part:
It appears that as minority foremen[] we are just an after thought and aren’t given the same opportunities as our counterparts were. Now that we hold these positions and with the advent of minorities into these positions it appears the opportunities no longer exist…
41. Dorsey sent copies of his November 8, 2006 letter to Sternadori and Pete
Hendershot. Again, Dorsey received no response from anyone.
Kevin Sluka Begins as Administrator of Borough of Somerville
42. In or about April 2007, Sluka succeeded Sternadori as the Administrator of
Somerville.
43. Shortly after Sluka first assumed the position as Administrator, he had a meeting
with Dorsey and Vandervoort. During this meeting, Sluka acknowledged the “old boys club”
that existed in Somerville, and assured Dorsey and Vandervoort that the culture in Somerville
would be changed under his watch. Dorsey and Vandervoort understood Sluka to be referring to
the racist culture that existed within DPW. Dorsey gave Sluka a copy of the letters he had
written to various Somerville executives in 2006.
44. Sluka also told Dorsey and Vandervoort that he had an “open door policy,” and
encouraged them to come to him if they ever had any issues.
45. Despite Sluka’s assurances that the culture in Somerville would change, Tony
Hendershot’s treatment of Dorsey and Plaintiffs remained the same, and the racial epithets
continued under Sluka’s watch.
46. Sluka, in fact, has contributed to the racist and hostile work environment. Upon
information and belief, for example, on or about December 23, 2013, Mike Johnson, a temporary
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 10 of 22 PageID: 10
11
African-American DPW employee, was on a ladder assisting with setting up inauguration. Sluka
commented to white DPW foreman Joe Szwarc, “you’d better shine a light on him or have him
open his eyes or smile -- we can’t see him up there.”
47. Sluka regularly refers to Hall as “homeboy,” “homey” or “homes” in
conversation. For instance, Sluka will often greet Hall by saying, “what’s up, homey?”
48. Upon information and belief, Sluka has also directed racist comments toward
Collazo. Specifically, during a blood drive in Somerville in late 2013 or early 2014, Sluka told
Collazo, who is Puerto Rican, that he could not donate blood because his “Spanish blood” was
“dirty” and “no good.”
49. Sluka’s comments toward Plaintiffs have been frequently insensitive and suggest
racist undertones. For example, Sluka has told Vandervoort, the foreman of sewers in DPW, that
Sluka’s “12 year old son could do [Vandervoort’s] job.” Sluka also has told Dorsey that he is
“lucky that he gets paid,” and that he would pay Plaintiffs nothing if he had the opportunity.
50. Similarly, during a conversation with Dorsey about his paycheck being late,
Sluka, in a mocking fashion, offered to lend Dorsey money, saying, “you don’t have enough
money? You want me to lend you some money?” And during the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy
in November 2012, when Plaintiffs were working around-the-clock in terrible conditions for
Somerville, Sluka commented to Vandervoort, “we fed you and put a roof over your heads --
what else could you want?”
Summer 2008: “Sensitivity Training” Following Abusive Incident by Tony Hendershot 51. In the summer of 2008, the day before Dorsey was about to go on a family
vacation, Tony Hendershot, who appeared to be under the influence of alcohol, confronted
Dorsey about pumps in the town pool. Tony Hendershot, in front of other DPW employees,
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 11 of 22 PageID: 11
12
repeatedly called Dorsey a “mother fucker” and a “fucking asshole,” accused Dorsey of not
knowing how to do his job, and threatened to fight Dorsey.
52. The following week, while Dorsey was on vacation, Mayor Gallagher and Sluka
left voicemails for Dorsey inquiring about the incident with Tony Hendershot, but Dorsey was
not able to speak to them about it, as he did not bring his phone on his trip out of the country and
did not realize they had left him voicemails.
53. That same week following Tony Hendershot’s threats against Dorsey, an attorney
conducted “sensitivity training” for the DPW employees (Dorsey, who was on vacation, did not
attend the training). At the end of the training, the attorney assured the DPW employees,
including Hall and Vandervoort, that they could call him to report any hostile work environment
issues.
54. When Dorsey returned from vacation the next week, Sluka told him that Tony
Hendershot had been reprimanded and was now on “thin ice.” However, Tony Hendershot’s
behavior and use of racial epithets on the job continued without punishment.
55. Later in 2008, Dorsey attempted to use Sluka’s “open door policy” to speak to
Sluka about an employment-related issue. Sluka refused to speak to Dorsey, and instructed Pete
Hendershot to “write up” Dorsey for going outside of the “chain of command.” Before Sluka,
Dorsey’s “chain of command” included only Tony Hendershot and Pete Hendershot.
56. The fact that Dorsey was written up for speaking directly to Sluka about a work-
related issue discouraged him from using Sluka’s purported “open door policy,” and caused him
to make no further efforts to follow up with Sluka about Tony Hendershot’s behavior.
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 12 of 22 PageID: 12
13
57. In the meantime, Tony Hendershot’s abusive and racist behavior continued. In or
about 2011, Hall spoke to Sluka about the situation, including the fact that Tony Hendershot
referred to Hall as “nigger” and other racial epithets, but Sluka took no action in response.
Tony Hendershot Tells Hall That His Wife “Sucks The White Man’s Dick”
58. In or about 2011, Mayor Gallagher invited Hall to play with him and Sluka in the
Mayor’s Challenge golf tournament.
59. After Hall joined Mayor Gallagher and Sluka for the golf tournament, Tony
Hendershot escalated his racial abuse of Hall, and Pete Hendershot also began to mistreat Hall on
the job.
60. Tony Hendershot’s abuse of Hall went to new levels in the summer of 2012. In or
about June 2012, when Hall was shampooing a rug in Borough Hall, Tony Hendershot, who
appeared to be intoxicated, confronted Hall and told him, “your wife sucks Kevin Sluka’s dick.
She sucks the white man’s dick.”
61. Hall promptly reported to Pete Hendershot and Sluka what Tony Hendershot had
said to him, and reiterated to Sluka the types of racial abuse that Tony Hendershot had subjected
him to on the job, including his frequent use of racial slurs such as “nigger” to describe Hall and
Plaintiffs. Hall then asked Sluka for the card of the attorney who conducted the sensitivity
training in 2008, but Sluka refused to give Hall the card, telling Hall that he would “handle it in
house.” Sluka told Hall that he would investigate the situation, but Sluka again took no action in
response.
62. While Sluka was purportedly handling Hall’s complaint “in house,” Tony
Hendershot continued to abuse Hall and other African-American employees. For instance, on
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 13 of 22 PageID: 13
14
one occasion in or about July 2012, Tony Hendershot called Hall a “spook” while Hall was
performing his job.
63. Pete Hendershot also began to actively mistreat Hall during this time, repeatedly
threatening to fire him for having spoken to Sluka about Tony Hendershot. For example, in
Januray 2013, Pete Hendershot said to Hall, “I'm in charge of you now so you can't run to Kevin
Sluka or I will fire you.” Pete Hendershot also mocked Hall by telling a fire department official,
“don’t say nothing to Wade [Hall] cause he’ll run to Kevin [Sluka].”
64. Throughout 2013, Tony Hendershot continued his racist treatment of Plaintiffs
and other African-American employees of DPW. For instance, upon information and belief, on
one occasion, Tony Hendershot was discussing ordering gloves with other DPW employees, and
said, “you better order the dark ones. They like the dark ones a lot.”
65. On one occasion in the summer of 2013, Hall and Tony Hendershot were
conversing when Tony Hendershot noticed that the pants of Darren Manfreade, a white DPW
employee, were low. Tony Hendershot commented to Hall, “Darren looks like a wigger.” Hall
asked Tony Hendershot what he meant, and he responded, “a white person acting like a nigger . .
. a nigger like you with his pants falling down.”
Hall Complains To Mayor Gallagher
66. In the late summer or early fall of 2013, Hall spoke to Mayor Gallagher regarding
the racial abuse he had suffered at the hands of Tony Hendershot. Hall told the mayor about
Tony Hendershot’s prior racist comments, including his use of the word “nigger” and his
comment about Hall’s wife “sucking the white man’s dick.”
67. Mayor Gallagher told Hall that such conduct could not be tolerated, and that he
would call Sluka and “handle this quick.” Sluka called Hall a day or two later, and asked how he
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 14 of 22 PageID: 14
15
was feeling (Hall had recently suffered an injury), but did not mention anything about Hall’s
complaint about Tony Hendershot’s racially abusive behavior, or anything about a conversation
with Mayor Gallagher.
First Snowstorm of 2013: Additional Racial Epithets by Tony Hendershot
68. On December 14, 2013, during the first major snowstorm of the winter, DPW
employees, including Tony Hendershot, Pete Hendershot, Dorsey and Hall, were performing
snow removal duties.
69. Dorsey was attempting to bring a piece of equipment into the garage, which
apparently angered Tony Hendershot. Upon information and belief, once Dorsey left, Tony
Hendershot, who was apparently intoxicated, told a group of white DPW employees, including
Pete Hendershot, “I’m tired of catering to these mother fucking niggers.”
70. In response, Pete Hendershot told Hall to take Tony Hendershot out and buy him
coffee. Once Tony Hendershot got into a truck with Hall, he turned to Hall and said, “Bro, I love
you, but you’re a nigger.” Tony Hendershot also said, “I’m going to fire all of you
motherfucking niggers when I’m in charge,” and repeated, “I love you, but you’re a nigger.”
71. Shortly after the December 14 incident, Dorsey spoke to Sluka’s assistant,
Halperin, about Tony Hendershot’s racist diatribe during the snowstorm. Halperin
acknowledged that he already knew about the incident, and assured Dorsey that Sluka knew what
had happened. Hall had a similar conversation with Halperin around this time, during which
Halperin told Hall that Sluka knew what had happened during the snowstorm.
72. On or about January 16, 2014, Sluka and Hall spoke about the snowstorm incident
involving Tony Hendershot. Hall told Sluka, “don’t worry about it, Kevin - I’ve got a lawyer
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 15 of 22 PageID: 15
16
now.” Only in response to Hall’s threat of legal action did Sluka finally take any action, hiring
an attorney to represent Somerville.
73. In the meantime, Tony Hendershot continued to work, and continued to abuse
Plaintiffs and other African-American employees. For instance, in January 2014, Tony
Hendershot used the term “wigger” in a conversation with Dorsey to refer to a white employee.
74. Later that month, on or about January 21, 2014, one of Tony Hendershot’s friends
from the Eagles Club, Ken Whalen, who was at DPW as a guest of Tony Hendershot’s, got into a
dispute with Vandervoort while Vandervoort was attempting to move a truck into the yard.
Whalen told Vandervoort, “Don’t hit me [with your truck] -- Martin Luther King Day was
yesterday and I’ll kick your ass.”
Harassment of Plaintiffs Continues Despite Investigation
75. Although Sluka and Somerville finally hired an attorney in January 2014 to look
into Tony Hendershot’s behavior, harassment of the Plaintiffs continued.
76. In late January or early February 2014, Tony Hendershot apparently opted to take
“early retirement” as a result of the discrimination complaint.
77. Following his brother's departure, Pete Hendershot began to retaliate against Hall.
For example, on Sunday, February 9, 2014, Pete Hendershot called Hall and told him that he
blamed him for his brother getting “fired,” and threatened to see to it that Hall would be fired.
78. Later that week, Pete Hendershot was injured, and is currently not working while
he recovers from injury.
79. In response, Sluka tapped his assistant, Mike Halperin, to oversee DPW, despite
Halperin’s complete lack of experience with DPW operations.
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 16 of 22 PageID: 16
17
80. Halperin used his position as temporary head of DPW to harass and retaliate
against Plaintiffs, particularly Dorsey, for having complained about discrimination in the
Borough.
81. Halperin stated on two different occasions to Dorsey that he would not have a job
for much longer. Halperin linked this threat to the Borough’s hiring of a consultant to oversee
DPW.
82. Specifically, Halperin told Dorsey, the Parks foreman, that he “won't have to
worry about parks when the new guy gets here – he’s a parks expert.” A couple of days later,
Halperin told Dorsey, “you’re not going to have a job much longer once the new guy gets here.”
83. In March 2014, Halperin also took Vandervoort aside and explained to him that
Vandervoort’s job was safe, but also said that Dorsey and Hall were not looked upon favorably
by Somerville executives, implying that their jobs were not safe.
84. Halperin also threatened African-American DPW employee Mike Johnson with
regard to his interview with the attorney Somerville had hired to look into Plaintiffs’ claims.
Specifically, on March 13, 2014, in the presence of Dorsey, Hall, and others, Halperin told
Johnson, “if you're smart, you'll keep your mouth shut and say nothing” to the attorney. Dorsey
and Hall also understood this comment to be directed to them, as they had interviews scheduled
with Somerville’s attorney as well.
85. Halperin has also commented on Dorsey’s race, telling Dorsey, in the presence of
Vandervoort and others, that he should look into government programs for “underprivileged
blacks” if he wanted to undertake a project to rehabilitate a building.
86. Finally, Halperin has used his temporary position at DPW to harass Dorsey and
Hall for job-related functions. For instance, when Dorsey caused minor damage to a fence while
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 17 of 22 PageID: 17
18
plowing snow, Halperin initially threatened to call the police and report a hit-and-run, and then
instructed Dorsey to write himself up for the incident.
87. Additionally, when Hall had to miss work due to a back injury, Halperin
threatened to have people check at Hall's house to make sure he was really there.
88. The pattern of harassment and threats made by Halperin, coupled with his racial
comment about “underprivileged blacks,” has continued to create a hostile work environment for
Plaintiffs to this day.
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
FIRST COUNT
Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1983 et seq.) Hostile Working Environment
89. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the above paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
90. Defendants subjected Plaintiffs to a hostile working environment based on race.
91. Defendants’ actions were unwelcome to Plaintiffs.
92. The harassment suffered by Plaintiffs was severe enough to make a reasonable
person of color believe that his working environment was hostile or abusive.
93. The harassment suffered by Plaintiffs was pervasive enough to make a reasonable
person of color believe that his working environment was hostile or abusive.
94. Plaintiffs believed their working environment to be hostile or abusive as a result
of Defendants’ conduct.
95. Defendants, acting under color of law, by policy or custom of the Borough of
Somerville, discriminated against Plaintiffs by creating a hostile working environment based on
race.
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 18 of 22 PageID: 18
19
96. Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.
97. Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the
United States Constitution.
98. Defendants’ actions caused harm to Plaintiffs.
SECOND COUNT
Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1983 et seq.) Retaliation
99. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the above paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
100. Plaintiffs engaged in protected conduct when they complained about racist actions
of Defendants and spoke to Somerville’s counsel about the hostile working environment.
101. Defendants, acting under color of law, retaliated against Plaintiffs for engaging in
protected behavior.
102. Defendants, acting under color of law, retaliated against Plaintiffs for opposing
discriminatory practices.
103. Defendants, acting under color of law, retaliated against Plaintiffs for
participating in an investigation into discriminatory practices.
104. Defendants took action against Plaintiffs that might well have have dissuaded a
reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.
105. Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.
106. Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the
United States Constitution.
107. Defendants’ actions caused harm to Plaintiffs.
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 19 of 22 PageID: 19
20
THIRD COUNT
Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C. § 1985 et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983 et seq.) Conspiracy
98. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the above paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
99. Defendants, acting under color of law, conspired to deprive Plaintiffs of their civil
rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983 et sq., and the Fourteenth Amendment of
the United States Constitution.
100. Defendants’ actions caused harm to Plaintiffs.
FOURTH COUNT
New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 et seq.) Hostile Working Environment
101. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the above paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
102. Defendants subjected Plaintiffs to a hostile working environment based on race.
103. Defendants Tony Hendershot, Pete Hendershot, Kevin Sluka and Mike Halperin
aided and abetted Defendant Borough of Somerville in subjecting Plaintiffs to a hostile working
environment.
104. Defendants’ actions caused harm to Plaintiffs.
FIFTH COUNT
New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 et seq.) Retaliation
105. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the above paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
106. Plaintiffs engaged in protected conduct when they complained about racist actions
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 20 of 22 PageID: 20
21
of Defendants and spoke to Somerville’s counsel about the hostile working environment.
107. Defendants retaliated against Plaintiffs for opposing discriminatory practices.
108. Defendants retaliated against Plaintiffs for participating in an investigation into
discriminatory practices.
109. Defendants retaliated against Plaintiffs for engaging in protected behavior.
110. Defendants’ actions caused harm to Plaintiffs.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendants, for:
A. Compensatory damages;
B. Consequential damages;
C. Punitive damages;
D. Interest, prejudgment and postjudgment;
E. Costs of suit;
F. Attorneys fees;
G. Equitable relief;
H. Such other relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 21 of 22 PageID: 21
22
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. s/ Sarah Fern Meil Sarah Fern Meil 67 Bridge Street P.O. Box 145 Milford, NJ 08848 Phone: (908) 995-7320 Fax: (609) 228-4307 [email protected]
Attorney for Plaintiffs - and - BROPHY & LENAHAN P.C.
Joseph Alexander Brophy, Esq. 2101 Pine Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Phone: (215) 558-7600 Fax: (215) 449-3376 [email protected] Pro hac vice application to be filed Dated: May 13, 2014
Case 3:14-cv-03053-PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 22 of 22 PageID: 22