Download - Some Issues in Charmonium Physics
![Page 1: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Some Issues in Charmonium PhSome Issues in Charmonium Ph
ysicsysics
K-T Chao
Peking University
![Page 2: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1. Puzzles in Double Charm Production
in e+e Annihilation–Inclusive J/ cc{\bar} production–Exclusive J/ C (C0, C(2S),…) production
2. D-wave Charmonium production –in e+e Annihilation –in B meson decay–S-D Mixing
3. Search for hC in B exclusive decays and infrared divergences
![Page 3: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Puzzles in Double Charm Production Puzzles in Double Charm Production in ein e++ee Annihilation Annihilation
INCLUSIVE PRODUCTION : e+e J/cc Theory: via ONE virtual photon
Cho-Leibovich (1996) Yuan-Qiao-Chao (1997) Baek-Ko-Lee-Song (1998) pQCD predicts: cross section at s
10.6 GeV 0.10-0.15pb Belle data 0.9pb, PRL89(2002)142001
larger than theory by almost one order of magnitude. Higher order corrections expected not large enough.
![Page 4: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Puzzles in Double Charm Production in ePuzzles in Double Charm Production in e++ee AnnihilationAnnihilation
EXCLUSIVE PROCESS
e+e J/ C (C0, C(2S),…)
Theory: via ONE virtual photon(Braaten-Lee (2003) PRD67, 054007)
(Liu-He-Chao (2003) PLB557, 45)
(Hagiwara-Kou-Qiao (2003) PLB570, 39)
pQCD prediction smaller again by an order of magnitude than
Belle cross section 0.033 pb for
e+e J/C (decaying to 4 charge
d) (PRL89, 142001)
![Page 5: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Puzzles in Double Charm Production in ePuzzles in Double Charm Production in e++ee AnnihilationAnnihilation
Theory: via TWO photons Enhanced by photon fragm
entation (small photon virtuality 4mc
2s ) Suppressed by QED over Q
CD couplings Exclusive J/ +J/ enhan
ced (Bodwin-Braaten-Lee, PRL90,
162001), the same order as for J/+ C (but ruled out later by data)
Inclusive J/ cc\bar via two photons prevail over via one photon when s 20GeV (Liu-He-Chao, PRD68, R031501)
![Page 6: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Puzzles in Double Charm Production in ePuzzles in Double Charm Production in e++ee AnnihilationAnnihilation
Annihilation into TWO photons can NOT solve problems for both inclusive and exclusive double charm production
Both data larger than pQCD predictions by about an order of magnitude
Color octet contributions are negligible
pQCD factorization fails(?) C=+ glueballs misidentified as
C (?) (Brodsky et al.)
Search for C=+ glueballs near 3 GeV from (2S) decay @ CLEOc & BESIII
![Page 7: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
D-wave Charmonium production D-wave Charmonium production in ein e++ee Annihilation and B decay Annihilation and B decay
New finding by Belle: D-wave charmonium is observed
in B decay for the first time (hep-ex/0307061)
B+(3770)K+ , BR = (0.48 ±0.11± 0.12) x 10-3, very la
rge, even comparable to
B+(2S)K+, BR=(0.66±0.06) x 10-3
If this implies large 2S-1D mixing?
S-D mixing vs. Color-Octet mechanism in D-wave char
monium production in B meson decay and in e+e Anni
hilation
![Page 8: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
S-D mixing betweenS-D mixing between ’= ’= (2S) &(2S) & ’’=’’= (3770)(3770)
If ignoring D-wave contribution to leptonic widths mixing angle ± 19º
![Page 9: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
DDetailed calculations (including tensor forcetailed calculations (including tensor force and coupled channel effects) indicating e and coupled channel effects) indicating
absolutely value smaller than absolutely value smaller than 10º 10º (Eichten et al, Kuang-Yan, Moxhay-Rosner,…)(Eichten et al, Kuang-Yan, Moxhay-Rosner,…)
Including D-wave contribution to leptonic Including D-wave contribution to leptonic
widths widths –– 10º 10º or or +30º +30º
![Page 10: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
+30º disfavored because it would give E1 transit+30º disfavored because it would give E1 transition width 5 times larger than the observed value of ion width 5 times larger than the observed value of
(2S)(2S)coco (Ding-Qin-Chao, PRD44(1991)(Ding-Qin-Chao, PRD44(1991)
Measurement of Measurement of (3770)(3770)cJ cJ at CLEOc & BESIII will at CLEOc & BESIII will
be another helpful check for the S-D mixingbe another helpful check for the S-D mixing
![Page 11: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
tan2 =0.11, if ± 19º
tan2 =0.03, if -- 10º Small S-D mixing can hardly explain the
Belle data if only the Color-Singlet (CS) S-wave component contributes (via CS V-A currents)
B+(3770)K+ , BR = (0.48 ±0.11± 0.12) x 10-3, B+(2S)K+, BR=(0.66±0.06) x 10-3
![Page 12: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
D-wave heavy quarkonium production D-wave heavy quarkonium production may be a crucial test of NRQCD color-may be a crucial test of NRQCD color-
octet mechanism.octet mechanism.In certain processes (e.g. gluon fragmentation, B In certain processes (e.g. gluon fragmentation, B meson decay,…) the D-wave charmonium signal meson decay,…) the D-wave charmonium signal
could be as strong as could be as strong as (2S)(2S) (Qiao-Yuan-Chao, PRD55(1997)4001)(Qiao-Yuan-Chao, PRD55(1997)4001) ( (Yuan-Qiao-Chao, PRD56(1997)329)Yuan-Qiao-Chao, PRD56(1997)329)
![Page 13: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Color-Octet (CO) mechanism may play important rColor-Octet (CO) mechanism may play important role for D-wave charmonium production in B decay ole for D-wave charmonium production in B decay due to large Wilson coefficient for CO effective V-due to large Wilson coefficient for CO effective V-A Hamiltonian and the NRQCD Fock state ExpansiA Hamiltonian and the NRQCD Fock state Expansi
on.on.
CO coefficient >> CS coefficientCO coefficient >> CS coefficient
![Page 14: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The inclusive decay branching ratio was predictedThe inclusive decay branching ratio was predictedBR(BBR(B(3770)X)=0.28% (3770)X)=0.28%
(Yuan-Qiao-Chao,1997)(Yuan-Qiao-Chao,1997), , [c.f. BR(B[c.f. BR(B++(2S)X)=(0.35(2S)X)=(0.35±0.05)%]±0.05)%]
[see also Ko-Lee-Song(1997)][see also Ko-Lee-Song(1997)]
![Page 15: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
NRQCD velocity scaling rules (with NRQCD velocity scaling rules (with some uncertainties)some uncertainties)
0018.0)()()(
71
38
51
38
31
38
111
CCC M
DO
M
PO
M
SOccc
![Page 16: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
D-wave charmonium production in eD-wave charmonium production in e++ee Annihilati Annihilationon
Color-Octet insignificant for double charm Color-Octet insignificant for double charm Color-singlet contributes 2-4 fb to e+
e (3770)cc\bar (Hao-Liu-Chao, PLB5
46(2002)216)
Color-octet suppressed by color fa
ctor of 3/32, no significant contrib
ution
S-D mixing will much help, since t
he observed rate of
e+e(1S)cc\bar 0.9pb,
(2S)cc\bar expected to be about a
half of (1S)cc\bar.
![Page 17: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
D-wave Charmonium production in eD-wave Charmonium production in e++ee Annihilation and B meson decayAnnihilation and B meson decay
Observed large rate of B+(3770)K+ could be
a strong support to either the Color-Octet mec
hanism or the large S-D mixing.
e+e (3770)cc\bar could be another test of
S-D mixing (no Color-Octet contamination).
(3770)cJ at CLEOc & BESIII will be an
other helpful check for the S-D mixing.
![Page 18: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Infrared Divergences in BInfrared Divergences in B CJ CJ K and BK and B
hhCCK Decays in QCD FactorizationK Decays in QCD Factorization(Song, Chao, Phys.Lett. B568 (2003)127)(Song, Chao, Phys.Lett. B568 (2003)127)
(Song, Meng, Gao, Chao, hep-ph/0309105)(Song, Meng, Gao, Chao, hep-ph/0309105)
BBNS (Beneke et al.) QCD factorization:
Good for Bpi pi, BD pi.
OK (infrared safe) for BJ/ K (Chay-Kim, Chen
g-Yang) B C K (Song-Meng-Chao); Color transpa
rency, small cc-bar size, viewed as color dipole.
Infrared divergences for B CJ K and B hCK Decays in QCD factorization and NRQCD
![Page 19: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Z= MZ= M22/M/MBB2 2 4m 4mc c
22 /m /mbb22
is the gluon mass for infrared is the gluon mass for infrared regularizationregularization
![Page 37: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
![Page 39: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
![Page 40: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
![Page 41: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
If using the infrared divergence term to esIf using the infrared divergence term to es
timate the decay widthstimate the decay widths as in the case of hadronic widths:as in the case of hadronic widths:
(hc ggg)=5/6 (c1qqg)
![Page 44: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Some Issues in Charmonium Physics](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56814ff8550346895dbdc154/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Very large branching ratio obtained for BhcK obtained!
But new method based on NRQCD still expected to remove infrared divergences!