Download - Shark Detection and Warning System
Shark Detection and Warning System
•Michael Beeler
–Program Manager
•Miriam Lindhorst
–Webmaster
•Marino Angeles
–Planning
•Vincent Lieu
–Testing
•Andrae Marable
–Budget
•Nathan Reeves
–Marketing
http://www.cs.odu.edu/~cpi/fall2001/sdws/
2
AbstractOceanfront resort cities in the United States have enjoyed
steady growth in direct tourism revenue for the past ten years. This growth has resulted in greater numbers of ocean swimmers taking advantage of resort beach facilities.
Unfortunately, this increase in swimmer activity has been accompanied by a proportional rise in shark attack incidents. Shark attacks during the twentieth century show a rate of increase which correlates with the population increase near the shore.
Over the next three years, our team will research and develop the Shark Detection and Warning System (SDWS) to warn swimmers of possible attack and protect oceanfront revenues. The SDWS will provide resort city managers with a warning of shark presence and an accompanying probability of attack.
ProblemOcean swimmers are concerned with the possibility of shark attack while swimming.
The Solution?
HF SONAR tracking Environmentally friendly Aesthetically pleasing Safe “Off the shelf” parts Proven technology Proven effectiveness
8
Bottom LineSchedule – 3 yearsBudget – $3,000,000
Profit – 3rd unit
9
Why?
Why will the project take so long?
Why does it cost so much?
Why don’t we see profit until the 3rd unit?
10
Ideal Location
Area with natural barriers Single point of entry Narrow opening Coverage with 1 or 2 sensors
13
Realistic Location
Long, straight beaches Florida, north/south
beaches Requires sensor array One mile sections to be
effective
14
15
SONAR Processing
SM-2000 SM-2000 SM-2000 SM-2000 SM-2000
Control House
Power Supply
Operator 1 Operator 2 Operator 3
17
Project Implementation Plan
Functional Specifications Prototype and Funding
Demonstration Production / Installation of Unit 1 Follow-on Production
18
Phase I
Preliminary Research: Preliminary Research: Start : 28-Aug Start : 28-Aug End: 18-SepEnd: 18-Sep16 days16 days
Determine Feasibility: Determine Feasibility: Start : 03-Oct Start : 03-Oct End: 16-OctEnd: 16-Oct10 days10 days
Determine Milestones: Determine Milestones: Start : 17-Oct Start : 17-Oct End: 08-NovEnd: 08-Nov17 days17 days
Gain Approval: Gain Approval: Start : 09-Nov Start : 09-Nov End: 06-DecEnd: 06-Dec20 days20 days
Develop Phase I Plan: Develop Phase I Plan: Start : 19-Sep Start : 19-Sep End: 02-OctEnd: 02-Oct10 days10 days
19
Phase II
Finalize Specifications: Finalize Specifications: Start : 07-Jan Start : 07-Jan End: 18-JanEnd: 18-Jan10 days10 days
Build Simulation: Build Simulation: Start : 19-Jan Start : 19-Jan End: 15-MarEnd: 15-Mar40 days40 days
Test Simulation: Test Simulation: Start : 16-Mar Start : 16-Mar End: 30-AprEnd: 30-Apr32 days32 days
Funding Demonstration: Funding Demonstration: Start : 07-Jan Start : 07-Jan End: 30-AprEnd: 30-Apr92 days92 days
20
Phase III
Final Management Plan: Final Management Plan: Start : 13-May-02 Start : 13-May-02 End: 01-Jul-02End: 01-Jul-0236 days36 days
Software Development: Software Development: Start : 02-Jul-02 Start : 02-Jul-02 End: 09-May-03End: 09-May-03224 days224 days
Set up /Administer Contracts: Set up /Administer Contracts: Start : 02-Jul-02 Start : 02-Jul-02 End: 19-Mar-04End: 19-Mar-04449 days449 days
Installation and Testing: Installation and Testing: Start : 01-Jul-03 Start : 01-Jul-03 End: 19-Mar-04End: 19-Mar-04166 days166 days
Shift to Production: Shift to Production: Start : 22-Mar-04 Start : 22-Mar-04 End: 12-Mar-04End: 12-Mar-0438 days38 days
21
BudgetProfit Plan
Mile Charge Cost Profit Cumulative1 $2,200,000 $3,000,000 -$800,000 -$800,0002 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 -$300,0003 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $200,0004 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $700,0005 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $1,200,0006 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $1,700,0007 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $2,200,0008 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $2,700,0009 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $3,200,00010 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $3,700,000
Totals $22,000,000 $18,300,000 $3,700,000
P1 1000 Preliminary Research 16 Days $4,308 28-Aug 18-SepP1 2000 Develop Phase I Plan 10 Days $16,692 19-Sep 2-OctP1 3000 Determine Feasibility 10 Days $16,692 3-Oct 16-OctP1 4000 Determine Milestones 17 Days $28,377 17-Oct 8-NovP1 5000 Gain Approval 20 Days $33,385 9-Nov 6-Dec
P1 Total $99,454
P2 0000 Finalize Specifications 10 Days $11,308 7-Jan-02 18-Jan-02P2 1000 Build Simulation 40 Days $45,231 19-Jan-02 15-Mar-02P2 2000 Test Simulation 32 Days $36,185 16-Mar-02 30-Apr-02P2 3000 Funding Demonstration 92 Days $49,538 7-Jan-02 30-Apr-02
P2 Total $142,262
P3 1000 Final Management Plan 36 Days $60,092 13-May-02 1-Jul-02P3 2000 Software development 224 Days $609,108 2-Jul-02 9-May-03P3 3000 Set up / Administer Contracts 449 Days $108,796 2-Jul-02 19-Mar-04P3 4000 Installation and Testing 166 Days $451,392 01-Aug-03 19-Mar-04P3 5000 Shift to Production 38 Days $63,431 22-Mar-04 12-May-04
P3 Total $1,292,819
Phase I Resource/Office costs $61,292
Phase II Resource/Office costs $45,292
Phase III Resource/Office costs $208,061
Phase III Hardware costs $1,150,000
Bottom Line $3,000,000
23
Production Schedule
Code Task CostPX 1000 Software development 80 Days $217,538PX 2000 Set up / Administer Contracts 130 Days $31,500PX 3000 Installation and Testing 90 Days $244,731
Office $57,660Hardware $1,150,000.00
Total $1,701,429
24
Contractual Aspects Kongsberg Simrad Mesotech Ltd.
Purchase of five SM2000 multi-beam SONAR systems.
Mooring Systems Inc. Purchase of five Bottom-mount instrument frames.
Site Specific Contracts Horizontal Boring Services Office Trailer Leasing
25
Other Requirements Control House Placement and Maintenance Purchase and Placement of Audible Warning
System
Purchase and Placement of Warning Flags Purchase and Maintain Marker System Implement Educational Measures
26
Risk Management Plan
• Inability to secure an investment
•Not enough clients
• Problems with Prime contractor
• Competitors
• Legal risks
27
Corporate Management Plan
M iriam L in d h ors tW eb m as te r
A n d rae M arab leB u d g et
N ath an R eevesM arke tin g
M arin o A n g e lesP lan n in g
V in cen t L ieuR esearch
M ich ae lP rog ram M an ag er
28
Corporate Management Plan
Project Manager
BudgetWebmasterResearch andDevelopment
Contracts
Developers Technical Writer
Marketing
Maintenance andLogistics
DatabaseAdministrator
29
Test PlanModule &Test case No.
Criteria for Test Case Scenario
Expected Outcome
Test Case Actual Results
Comments Date/TimeTester
Test case #1:Sonar Head with Transducer
With version ranging from 60 to 180 degrees, Sonar head covers the specified degree with a maximum of 128 beams.
Minimum of 60 degree coverage.
Selected test input data will be provided.
Pass Fail
90 kHz and 400 m range
Ensure operating as specified
Selected test input data will be provided.
To provide ping rate up to 20/second
Ping rate of 20/second or less
Selected test input data will be provided.
Pass Fail
30
Evaluation Plan Program Design Review (PDR) Critical Design Review (CDR) Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Customer Acceptance Test
(CAT)
Marketing Plan
• 420 years of data
• United States and Australia
33
Strategy Direct Mailings Radio Trade Journals Word of Mouth Demonstrations Internet
34
Funding Plan (Corporate) EDO Corporation General Electric Raytheon Atlas-Krupp Thompson Electronics General Dynamics Klein Associates Inc. Lockheed Martin Northrop-Grumman
35
Funding Plan (Other)
State Task ForceCIT Group
A school of fish approaching a net and avoiding it.
10
15
20
SHARK
THREAT
BEARING:
060º
RANGE:
200m
COURSE:
160º
SPEED:
4k
R EXTENT:
25m
B EXTENT:
22º
GRID X: 0CGRID Y: 08
N S
E
W