School of Population and Health Sciences
Centre for Health Services Research
Using guidelinesin healthcare settingsMartin EcclesProfessor of Clinical EffectivenessUniversity of Newcastle upon Tyne
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Using guidelinesin healthcare settings
• How to think about approaching it
• Two examples– DVT prophylaxis in an acute trust– X-ray guidelines in primary care
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Grol, Wensing, Eccles
Improving Patient Care: The implementation of change in clinical practice.
Available from Elsevier Press.
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
My starting point
• Many patients do not receive optimal care – Well-planned programmes
• are required to implement new or valuable scientific findings, guidelines, protocols, care processes or best practices.
– Different approaches • to the implementation of change in patient care can be
observed, each based on different assumptions and theories of human and organisational behaviour.
– A combination• Rational, top-down and participative, bottom-up
approaches is needed to improve practice successfully.
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Planning models – a selection
• PRECEED/PROCEED model (Green and Kreuter 1991);
• Marketing theory (Kotler and Roberto 1989);• Continuous improvement, PDSA cycles (Ovretveit
1999; Langley et al. 1996);• Stages of change theories (Prochaska and Velicer
1997; Grol 1992; Rogers 1983);• Persuasion–communication models (Kok 1987;
Rogers 1983; McGuire 1981);• Intervention mapping (Bokhoven et al. 2003;
Bartholomew et al. 2001);• Organisational development (Garside 1998).
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Common features (1)
• A systematic approach to and good planning of implementation activities is needed most of the time.
• Focus on the innovation– is it a ‘good product’?
• Subgroups within the target group may be at different stages of the change process and have different needs– allowed for segmentation within the target group
• Diagnostic analysis of the target group and setting before the start of the implementation.
• The target group should be involved in the development and adaptation of the innovation, as well as in planning the implementation.
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Common features (2)
• Implementation activities should link with the results of the diagnostic analysis.
• Usually, a single method or measure is insufficient (?)– search for a cost-effective mix of methods tailored to the identified
obstacles and incentives to change.• Make a distinction between the phases of implementation
(dissemination, implementation and integration) – different measures and strategies are effective at different stages.
• Take appropriate measures for each of the various levels – national, local, team, practice and individual professional.
• Continuous evaluation of both the implementation process and its results.
• Make implementation an integral part of the existing structures.
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Implementation of change: a model
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Starting point (1)
• Problems identified, good experiences, knowledge of best practice– What do you and your organisation know
about the healthcare you deliver?– What do you and your organisation
want/need to know to judge quality of care?
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Starting point (2)
• Research findings or GUIDELINES– Why develop a guideline?
• Explicit criteria• What is the problem to which your guideline is the
answer?
– Consider implementation during development• Head injury & MRI scanning
– Different formats– Wording
• Michie & Johnston. Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific. BMJ, 2004; 328: 343-5
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Attributes of guidelines
• Complexity, trialability – Complex 42% v 56%– Trialable 56% v 37%
• Grilli & Lomas 1994
• 17% variation in compliance explained by attributes of recommendations– Requiring no change in routines; compatability;
concrete, specific and clearly defined• Grol 1998, Burgers 2003, Foy 2002
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Planning
• Clear aims• Co-ordination/team
– Likely to be complicated & multi-disciplinary• Involve target group
– Their “buy in”– Their knowledge
• Resources– Financial & human
• Skills – behaviour change, IT, management
• Timescale
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Next step
• Develop concrete proposal/targets for improvement or change– Be as specific as possible– How much can you do?
• Within a guideline• Across guidelines
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Diagnostic analysis
• An analysis of the target group, the setting in which change is planned and the determinants of change– Who is involved? Which interests are relevant?– What is current practice? Which improvements are
needed?– What are the barriers and facilitators for change in
different subgroups?– Which subgroups can be distinguished in the
target group and at what stages of change are these subgroups?
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Diagnostic analysis
• Barriers and facilitators can relate to:– the individual care provider
• knowledge, attitude, motivation for change and personal characteristics
– the social setting • care providers and patients
– the organisational and financial system • organisation, resources, financial structure,
personnel and logistics
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Diagnostic analysis
• Methods– Multiple
• Interviews• Focus groups• Surveys• Routinely available data
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Selecting strategies for change
• Numerous interventions (strategies and measures) can be used to change behaviour or implement innovations:– Professional-oriented strategies– Patient-oriented strategies– Financial measures– Organisational measures– Legal regulations and/or rules
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Selecting strategies for change
• In selecting interventions consider:– Results of the ‘diagnostic analysis’ of both the
target group and the implementation setting– Existing knowledge of effective implementation
– EPOC, – Grimshaw JM et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of
guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004
– Wensing, Wollersheim, Grol. Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care. Implementation Science 2006:1;2
– Phases in the actual process of implementation and change (a distinction between dissemination, implementation and maintenance of change)
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Organising the implementation
• Good planning is of great importance – Begin small, test the plan on a small scale using
motivated groups and gradually expand• In making the plan, consider:
– A cost-effective mixture of interventions of proven value
– Implementation activities in all phases of the process of change, so the plan is for both dissemination and implementation
– Implementation activities at the correct or multiple levels (central, local group, team/department, practice and individual)
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Organising the implementation
• Good planning & time management;• Involve the target group in designing and executing
the plan• Incorporate the plan into existing activities for
communication and teaching of the target group• Adequate budgetary and other support• Incorporate periodic evaluation in the plan• Consider organisational aspects that promote or
retard implementation– Leadership, the role of physicians, collaboration, teaching of
quality methods and organisation culture
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Context
• Newcastle and North Tyneside Health Authority established a Clinical Effectiveness Unit– Remit was to provide support to local health-care
teams• aim of promoting clinical effectiveness• encouraging the use of best evidence in daily practice
through systematic, evidence based approaches to implementation
• Three acute hospital trusts in Newcastle upon Tyne
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
The hospitals
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Topic selection
• Venous thrombo-embolism:– Clinical Effectiveness Steering Group
agreed criteria to select prevention of venous thromboembolism as a priority area
– Given to the Clinical Effectiveness Unit in September 1996
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Local guideline adaptation
• Guidelines Development Group:– Clinical Effectiveness Unit began working with a local
guidelines development group to adapt the recommendations of a national guideline
– Produced a local guideline which was widely distributed to local clinicians for review and piloted on four wards at the end of September 1996:
• Scope of the guidelines: risk assessment and prevention of deep vein thrombosis in hospitalised patients
• Intended purpose of the guidelines: to standardise procedures within and between local Trusts
• Staff involved: nursing staff to carry out risk assessment and medical staff to administer appropriate prophylaxis, as necessary
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Implementation
• Guideline Implementation Group:– Month 4 A multidisciplinary implementation group was convened, to
develop the practical aspects of implementing guidelines into routine daily practice
• Production of “guideline pack”:– Month 10/11 The implementation group produced a “guideline
pack” • A guideline binder, a training resource manual and implementation aids
• Dissemination and implementation of guidelines:– Month 11-14 A multiple strategy implementation programme was
used to introduce the guidelines, initially into Trust 1 and Trust 2. Guidelines were introduced into Trust 3 in Month 20
• (1) local change agents and opinion leaders;• (2) training and education• (3) advertising.
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Evaluation
• Evaluation of guidelines use:– Month 21 Process evaluation was carried out in
Trust 1 and Trust 2, eight to ten months after the introduction of the guidelines
• Guidelines review:– Month 28 based on feedback and new evidence,
additions and changes were made to the guidelines and sent out for review and comments to local health-care professionals
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
What happened?
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
What happened?
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
What happened?
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
What happened?
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Prophylaxis
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Prophylaxis
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Prophylaxis
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Implementation research – a question
• Can we alter the rate of inappropriate requests for X-rays?
• Are the requests that are made appropriate?– Lumbar spine; knee– Successful outcome: reduction in the number of x-
rays requested. • Exercise in counting requests - not necessary to identify
individual basis• Data for evaluation routinely available from radiology
department referrals
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Study design
• Before and after pragmatic randomised controlled trial using a 2 x 2 factorial design– 2 x 2 factorial design (4 groups)
1: paper guidelines only2: paper guidelines + audit3: paper guidelines + condition-specific reminders4: paper guidelines + audit + condition-specific reminders
– Powered to be able to detect interactions
• 247 general practices; 6 radiology departments
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Audit and Feedback
Requests per 1000 patients
85.080.0
75.070.0
65.060.0
55.050.0
45.040.0
35.030.0
25.020.0
15.010.0
5.00.0
Requests for knee x-raysN
um
be
r o
f pra
ctic
es
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Std. Dev = 16.93
Mean = 15.8
N = 247.00
Your practice
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Condition-specific reminders
• NEXUS EDUCATIONAL MESSAGEIn either acute (less than 6 weeks) or chronic
back pain, without adverse features, x-ray is not routinely indicated
In adults with knee pain, without significant locking or restriction in movement, x-ray is not routinely indicated
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
What happened?
6262 6161 6161 6262N =
Condition
SpinesKnees
Ch
an
ge
in r
eq
ue
sts
pe
r 1
00
0 p
atie
nts
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
Intervention
No intervention
Audit only
Reminder only
Audit & reminder
11111
1
1
1
42
1
41
1
1
7
2
51
1
1
7
2
233
1121
3
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Implementation Science
EditorsMartin Eccles, Brian [email protected]
ScopeAll aspects of research relevant to
the scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings into routine healthcare in both clinical and policy contexts
www.implementationscience.com
Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Conclusions
• It takes:– Time – Resources – Commitment– Team work– Enthusiasm
Buena Suerte!