SafeOP for petroleum and gas
Part B Self-audit tool
While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of this information, the Department of Natural Resources and Mines makes no representations or
warranties about its accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability for any particular purpose and disclaims all responsibility and all liability
(including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages (including indirect or consequential damage) and costs which
might be incurred as a result of the information being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason.©The State of Queensland (Department of Natural Resources and Mines) March 2013
Version 2 - March 2013
Copyright protects this publication. Organisations and individuals are permitted to copy and distribute this publication without obtaining approval
from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines; however, the copyright information must be incorporated into any reproduction of this
publication.
Further Information
Chief Inspector of Petroleum and Gas
GPO Box 15216
Brisbane Qld 4001
Phone: 32371626
Fax: 32247768
Email: [email protected]
Web site: www.dnrm.qld.gov.au
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool ii
ContentsIntroduction 1
A guide to s.675 safety management plan requirements and other legislative obligation elements 5
Self-audit tool and checklist 5
Self-audit tool explanatory notes 6
SafeOP Self Audit 7
Findings Summary 8
Element 1 s.675(1)(a) description of the plant 9
Element 2 s.675(1)(b) organisational safety policies 12
Element 3 s.675(1)(c) organisational structure and safety responsibilities 14
Element 3A s.675(1)(ca) operator of the plant 16
Element 4 s.675(1)(d) site safety manager 17
Element 5 s.675(1)(e) risk assessment 19
Element 6 s.675(1)(f) interaction with other operating plant or contractors 20
Element 7 s.675(1)(g) skills assessment 22
Element 8 s.675(1)(h) training and supervision program 24
Element 9 s.675(1)(i) safety standards and operating procedures 26
Element 10 s.675(1)(j) control systems 30
Element 11 s.675(1)(k) machinery and equipment 31
Element 12 s.675(1)(l) emergency equipment, preparedness and procedures 33
Element 13 s.675 1)(m) communication systems 36
Element 13A s.675(1)(ma) management of change 38
Element 14 s.675(1)(n) implementing, monitoring and reviewing SMPs 40
Element 15 s.675(1)(p) key performance indicators 43
Element 16 s.675(1)(q) investigation, recording and review of incidents 44
Element 17 s.675(1)(r) records management 47
Element 18 s.675(1)(s) Work Health and Safety Act 2011, relevant requirements 48
Element 19 s.675(1)(t) major hazard facility 51
Element 20 s.675(1)(u) another mater prescribed under regulation 52
Element 21 Guide to other legislative obligations 55
Element 22 s.65(1)(a) (Reg) impacts of stimulation activities 58
Element 23 s.65(1)(b) (Reg) additional risks that may arise by operating in or adjacent to
a coal mining lease 59
Element 24 s.388 risk assessment and mitigation in coal mining 60
Element 25 s.705A-C principal hazard management plan content requirements 61
Element 26 Other legislative obligations coal seam gas 63
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool iii
IntroductionThis document is a self audit tool to assist operators in reviewing compliance and mapping their current safety management system against the element of section 675 of the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 (P&G Act).This document complements the more extensive SafeOP Explanatory Guide which provides detail of the content requirements of section 675 of the P&G Act.The P&G Act obligates operators of operating plant to include a number of elements in the safety management plan (SMP) to the extent that they are appropriate for the plant. These are outlined in s.675 of the P&G Act (content requirements for safety management plans), s.388 of the P&G Act (additional content requirements), s.705B (content requirements for principal hazard management plans), and s.59 of the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Regulation 2004 (P&G Reg).
The P&G Act and P&G Reg also impose other obligations that may be audited by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Petroleum and Gas Inspectorate.
This self-audit tool provides a checklist of items that should be addressed for each element required under the legislation (More detailed information about these requirements can be found in SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part A: Explanatory guide to s.675 Safety Management Plan elements and other legislative requirements at Operating Plant). The extent to which these need to be addressed will vary depending on the type and complexity of the operating plant. The self-audit tool can be used to:
map where the information or process required by a particular element is located in the operator’s SMP or system
identify what is already in place and what still needs to be addressed
determine what evidence exists that the requirement has been met
state why it is inappropriate or unnecessary to address a particular requirement.
The checklist in the self-audit tool is by no means exhaustive and, in many cases, additional items may need to be addressed. The documented is formatted with sections to allow the operator to map the information to their safety management system and make any relevant comments.
Legislative requirement elements for operating plant The legislative requirements that operators may need to address have been divided into 28 elements (numbered from 1 – 26 including 3A and 13A). These can be grouped into three areas:
1. Section 675 safety management plan legislative requirements - The first 22 elements pertain to safety management plan legislative requirements specified in the P&G Act (including element 20, which details four additional sections from the P&G Reg).
2. Other safety legislative obligations - Element 21 deals with other safety legislative obligations outside section 675 relevant to operators of operating plant that may be subject to audit.
3. Coal seam gas regime requirements - Coal seam gas regime additional requirements are detailed in Elements 22 to 26. These elements deal primarily with additional safety management plan requirements, which the SMP must address, with respect to overlapping coal and petroleum tenure. They are intended to ensure that petroleum exploration and production activities do not adversely affect the current and future safe and efficient mining of coal. Principally, these requirements relate to drilling rig type operating plant. Element 26 describes the other legislative obligations associated with the coal seam gas regime.
Note: Elements 1–21 will apply to some degree to most operating plant. However, the specific items to consider under each element will vary depending on the type, complexity and location of the plant.
Elements 22–26 typically apply to drilling related operating plant, particularly plant whose activities may impact on coal seams.
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 1
A guide to s.675 safety management plan requirements and other legislative obligation elements Each separate requirement (or element) is discussed in detail in the Explanatory Guide (Part A) of SafeOP. This self audit tool (Part B) should be read and used in conjunction with the Explanatory Guide. Some of the guidance offered will clearly not be applicable to certain types of operating plant and at certain stages of the plant. If addressing a particular element is deemed inappropriate, then justification for that judgment will need to be documented. All the elements and where they apply are summarised in the table below.
Element Act/Reg section Description Application Page1 s.675(1)(a) A description of the plant, its location and operations. Universal 12
2 s.675(1)(b) Organisational safety policies. Universal 15
3 s.675(1)(c) Organisational structure and safety responsibilities. Universal 17
3A s.675(1)(ca) For an operating plant, other than a coal mining-CSG operating plant.
Universal 19
4 s.675(1)(d) Each site at the plant for which a site safety manager is required.
Universal 20
5 s.675(1)(e) A formal safety assessment consisting of the systematic assessment of risk and a description of the technical and other measures undertaken, or to be undertaken, to control the identified risk.
Universal 22
6 s.675(1)(f) If there is proposed, or there is likely to be, interaction with other operating plant or contractors in the same vicinity, or if there are multiple operating plant with different operators on the same petroleum tenure, geothermal tenure or GHG authority.
Where applicable
23
7 s.675(1)(g) A skills assessment identifying the minimum skills, knowledge and experience requirements for each person to carry out specific work.
Universal 25
8 s.675(1)(h) A training and supervision program containing the mechanism for imparting the skills, knowledge, competencies and experience identified in paragraph (g) and assessing new skills, monitoring performance and ensuring ongoing retention of skill levels.
Universal 27
9 s.675(1)(i) Safety standards and standard operating procedures applied, or to be applied, in each stage of the plant
Universal 29
10 s.675(1)(j) Control systems including, for example, alarm systems, temperature and pressure control systems, and emergency shutdown systems.
Universal 33
11 s.675(1)(k) Machinery and equipment relating to, or that may affect, the safety of the plant.
Universal 34
12 s.675(1)(l) Emergency equipment, preparedness and procedures.
Universal 36
13 s.675(1)(m) Communication systems including, for example, emergency communication systems.
Universal 39
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 2
13A s.675(1)(ma) A process for managing change including a process for managing any change to plant, operating procedures, organisational structure, personnel and the safety management plan.
Universal 41
14 s.675(1)(n) The mechanism for implementing, monitoring and reviewing and auditing safety policies and safety management plans.
Universal 43
15 s.675(1)(p) Key performance indicators to be used to monitor compliance with the plan and the P&G Act.
Universal 46
16 s.675(1)(q) (i) Mechanisms for the investigation, recording and review of incidents at the plant(ii) Implementing recommendations from an investigation or review of an incident at the plant
Universal 47
17 s.675(1)(r) Record management including, for example, all relevant approvals, certificates of compliance and other documents required under this Act
Universal 50
18 s.675(1)(s) To the extent that, because of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011, Schedule 1, Part 2, Division 1, section 2, that Act does not apply to a place or installation at the plant, details, including codes and standards adopted, addressing all relevant requirements under that Act that would, other than for that section, apply
Operating plant on an authority to prospect, petroleum lease or pipeline license
51
19 s.675(1)(t) If the operating plant is, under the NOHSC standard, a major hazard facility each matter not mentioned in paragraphs (b) to (r) that is provided for under chapters6 to 10 of that standard
For operating plant that fall under the definition of a MHF
54
20 s.675(1)(u) Another matter described under regulation 55
s.59A Particular risk assessment for drilling near coal mining areas
Plant operating in or adjacent to a coal mining lease or in an area where current or abandoned mine workings exist
55
s.59B Requirement for identification of, and controls for, ignition sources for safety management plan
Drilling operating plant
56
s.59C Standard operating procedures for well completion equipment
Drilling operating plant that installs well completion equipment
56
s.59D Lower flammable limit alarm levels for unplanned or uncontrolled gas release
Petroleum processing facility
57
21 Various (15 sub elements)
Guide to other legislative obligations Additional legislative obligations there are a number of legislative obligations over and above the specific s675 and related SMP
Where applicable
58
22 s.65(a) impacts of stimulation activities on safe and efficient coal mining
Operating plant drilling or completing a prescribed well and undertaking stimulation activities in a coal seam
61
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 3
23 s.65(b) Additional risks that may be arise by operating in or adjacent to a coal mining lease (s.65 of the Regulation for details).
Plant operating in or adjacent to a coal mining lease
62
24 s.388(1) assessment and mitigation of particular potential risks related to safe and efficient mining of coal
Plant used to explore for, extract, produce or release petroleum within coal seams being completed or tested
63
25 s.705B Principal Hazard Management Plan content requirements (s.705 A -C)
Plant operating in area of coal or oil shale mining lease where plant may physically affect safe and efficient mining
64
26 s.236 Other legislative obligationsCoordination Arrangement
Operating plant drilling or completing a well or particular overlapping production leases subject to a coordination arrangement
66
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 4
Self-audit tool and checklistTo assist operators in preparing and auditing their safety management plans, a high level checklist has been prepared along with a self-audit tool, which can be used to ensure that all the legislative requirements have been addressed.
Quick checklist for Safety Management Plans
The following quick reference checklist is provided to assist the operator in ensuring their safety management system or plan meets the legislative requirements.
Item Action Done
Must-haves
1 Is the SMP in place before a defined stage of the operating plant commences?
2Has a commissioning notice been provided as required under s.673A of the P&G Act and in accordance with guidelines? The PDF document is available at: http://mines.industry.qld.gov.au/assets/petroleum-pdf/guide_commissioning_s673a.pdf
3 Is the SMP accessible as required under s.676 of the P&G Act?
4 Have all necessary elements (legislative requirements) been addressed?
for most plant–at least elements 1–17
for a plant within a petroleum authority–also element 18
for MHF related plant–also element 19
for plant drilling near mine workings–also element 20
for plant that may impact on coal mining–also elements 22–26.
5 If the elements are not addressed, is the reason justified in accordance with s.675(2)?
6 If the SMP does not follow s.675 format, is there a document that maps the SMP with the elements in the SafeOP document? Note: This self–audit tool is one means of achieving this.
7 Have all other relevant legislative obligations (element 21) been considered and incorporated where appropriate?
8 Have all statutory positions been identified, and where appropriate, been appointed?
9Is risk assessment and management comprehensive and embedded throughout the safety management system and are the procedures commensurate with the complexity of the plant?
10 Is the plan current and are there processes for it to be kept up to date and to address impacts of change (in complexity and size of plant, new technology, new activities etc.)?
11 Have plant employees been actively involved in the development of the SMP?
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 5
Self-audit tool explanatory notesThe self-audit tool provides a checklist of items/matters that should be addressed for each element required under the legislation (as detailed in the SafeOp document). The self-audit tool can be used to:
map where this information or process required by a particular element is located in the systems
determine what evidence exists that the requirement has been met
state why it is inappropriate to address that requirement
identify what is already in place, and what still needs to be addressed.
The extent to which each element and each element item needs to be addressed will vary depending on the operating plant type and its complexity.
The checklist is by no means exhaustive and in many cases additional items may need to be addressed.
Item heading: Against each element item heading the degree of compliance should be noted a Yes/No or Part (Green/Red/Amber) or N/A.
Evidence source/SMP reference: A reference to where the listed item can be found in the SMP or related supporting documentation should be made here.
Where it is an implementation related matter the source of evidence (eg verbally advised by operator/rig manager).
Assessment/Comments: Assessment and comments should be made here in regard to identified deficiencies (part or whole) or strengths or comments could be made on the evidence itself particularly when looking at implementation issues.
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 6
SafeOP self auditComplete this section to:
describe the plant and company details list your safety management plan details list details of when this self-audit tool is used.
Description of plant Name of plant: Location of plant:
Operator name: Operator entity name:
Safety management plan details:Name of SMP/system: Date of SMP/system:
Version number of SMP/system:
Audit details Names and titles of people undertaking audit/using self-audit tool:
Signatures:
Date of audit/use of self-audit tool:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 7
Findings summaryElement Act/Reg
sectionCompliant(Y/N/P)
Comment Action
1 s.675(1)(a)
2 s.675(1)(b)
3 s.675(1)(c)
3A s.675(1)(ca)
4 s.675(1)(d)
5 s.675(1)(e)
6 s.675(1)(f)
7 s.675(1)(g)
8 s.675(1)(h)
9 s.675(1)(i)
10 s.675(1)(j)
11 s.675(1)(k)
12 s.675(1)(l)
13 s.675(1)(m)
13A s.675(1)(ma)
14 s.675(1)(n)
15 s.675(1)(p)
16 s.675(1)(q)
17 s.675(1)(r)
18 s.675(1)(s)
19 s.675(1)(t)
20 s.675(1)(u)
s.59A
s.59B
s.59C
s.59D
21 Various (15 sub elements)
22 s.65(a)
23 s.65(b)
24 s.388(1)
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 8
Element 1 - Section 675(1)(a) description
A description of the plant, its location and operationsItem Complies
Yes/No/Part Application
Street addresses/locations of the plant correctly displayed. Y/N/P UniversalEvidence source/SMP Reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Names and addresses of agents/distributors. Complies Yes/No/Part
LPG distributors
Street addresses/locations of the plant correctly displayed. Y/N/P UniversalEvidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Plant type, nature, purpose, gas type, gas use, size. Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P yes
LPG distributors
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Plant layout including location of critical isolation and abatement equipment.
Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Petroleum facilities, LPG/cylinder storage facilities, major industrial gas users.
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Description of nature and number of transportation vehicles. Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P
LPG distributors
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 9
Map of plant coverage area (include well heads, gathering systems etc).
Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Brief plant history, including age, significant modifications, previous owners.
Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Major incidents. Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Flow diagrams. Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Application Petroleum facilities, LPG/cylinder storage facilities, major industrial gas users
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Personnel levels including contractors. Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 10
Scaled maps of the surrounding area showing land uses, buffer zones, sensitive areas (e.g. populated areas), interaction with other plant.
Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P
All except for distribution and reticulation networks and authorities
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Map showing relationship of plant to petroleum or mining Complies Yes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Plant on or near petroleum mining tenures/authorities
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 11
Element 2 - Section 675(1)(b) policies
Organisational safety policiesItem Compliance ApplicationAre the safety policies dated and signed by ESM. Complies
Yes/No/Part Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Policies state safety and health objectives and declare management’s commitment to those objectives.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Policies are clear, understandable and available to all employees and contractors.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Safety policies are implemented at all levels. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Where applicable, employees have been involved in development of policies.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 12
Is there a drug and alcohol testing policy and schedule in place and is there documented evidence availableIs there a minimum number of tests per person per year or just random testingDoes the company have a formal policy of drug and alcohol testing at the time significant incidentsUniversal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 13
Element 3 - Section 675(1)(c) organisational structure
Organisational structure and safety responsibilitiesItem Compliance ApplicationCurrent organisation chart is up to date and clearly identifies who is responsible for the control of work.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Job descriptions exist for all persons responsible for control of work.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Evidence (e.g. letters of appointment) exists that people with responsibilities are informed of these responsibilities.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
People are fully aware of legislation and duty of care obligations.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The relationships between contractors and the organisation, including contractors’ accountabilities and responsibilities, are clearly defined.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 14
Process for communicating safety and health responsibilities is in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Process for holding accountable employees with safety and health responsibilities is in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Resources needed to ensure safety objectives are met and safety management system is implemented, maintained and improved, have been identified.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 15
Element 3A – Section 675(1)(ca) the operatorFor an operating plant, other than a coal mining-CSG operating Plant- the operator of the plant:Item Compliance ApplicationDoes the SMP state an Operator must be appointed for the plant and if so, has one been formally appointed an operator for the plant?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Is there evidence that the appointed operator is aware of his formal obligations under the SMP to revise and review the plan?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Is there evidence that the SMP has been reviewed? CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Is the operator aware of their other legislative obligations? CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 16
Element 4 – Section 675(1)(d) site safety managerEach site at the plant for which a site safety manager is requiredItem Compliance ApplicationDoes the SMP state a Site Safety Manager is required at the site/plant?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Full justification is made where a SSM is deemed not to be required.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Has the SSM been identified in the SMP? CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Site safety managers are aware of their obligations to ensure: Site inductions are given to all people entering the site Each person complies with standard operating and
emergency procedures and other safety measures Appropriate first aid and safety equipment is available
and maintained Relevant employees are trained in first aid, emergency
and other safety procedures.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
What processes are in place to ensure the above obligations are met?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Position descriptions of all employees responsible and Complies Universal
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 17
accountable for meeting the above obligations clearly state those responsibilities.
Yes/No/PartY/N/P
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Is there a documented handover process for the handover of SSMs
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 18
Element 5 – Section 675(1)(e) risk assessmentA formal safety assessment consisting of the systematic assessment of risk and a description of the technical and other measures undertaken, or to be undertaken, to control the identified risk
Item Compliance ApplicationDocumented systematic assessment of risk, including hazard register, is in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
All identified risks are assessed to be as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP).
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Controls to manage the risks are clearly identified and linked to both the risk register and the safety management system.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The controls also linked to training and awareness programs, as appropriate.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Has identification and management of potential risks from ignition sources been identified.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 19
Element 6 – Section 675(1)(f) interaction with operating plantIf there is proposed, or there is likely to be, interaction with other operating plant or contractors in the same vicinity, or if there are multiple operating plant with different operators on the same petroleum tenure
(i) a description of the proposed or likely interactions, and how they will be managed; and
(ii) an identification of the specific risks that may arise as a result of the proposed or likely interactions, and how the risks will be controlled; and
(iii) an identification of the safety responsibilities of each operator
Item Compliance ApplicationResponsibilities of all operators/contractors are clearly identified, documented and communicated to the responsible persons.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Processes for communication when work is occurring are in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
There is joint involvement in risk assessment, and control and development of operating procedures where operations overlap or interact.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Do contractors and subcontractors use the same system for reporting and investigation of incidents?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 20
Principal has access to contractor records and systems. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Monitoring, inspection and audit include contractors. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 21
Element 7 – Section 675(1)(g) skills assessment
A skills assessment identifying the minimum skills, knowledge and experience requirements for each person to carry out specific workItem Compliance ApplicationCompetency standards are determined for every person/ position taking into account all work undertaken.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Training needs analysis (TNA) is conducted for all employees in consultation with employees.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
A documented training program exists to ensure all personnel have undertaken training as identified by a TNA and the program provides for competencies to be monitored and maintained (currency).
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Have the required drilling competencies been incorporated into the present and future employees TNA.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Drilling related plant
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 22
Requirements for level of supervision are determined (direct – indirect).
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
General competency needs are identified. Employees have adequate competencies to enable them to undertake their day-to-day activities safely (should include an understanding of barriers and controls; how to identify new hazards and how to change SOPs).
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Applicability of competencies is established and training provided by external and national bodies is assessed.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 23
Element 8 - Section 675(1)(h) trainingA training and supervision program containing the mechanism for imparting the skills, knowledge, competencies and experience identified in paragraph (g) (Element 7) and assessing new skills, monitoring performance and ensuring ongoing retention of skill levels
Item Compliance ApplicationTraining program is established including determination of need for accredited trainers.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Who provides the competency based training CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Safety critical training is competency based. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Refresher training needs are identified and programmed. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 24
Processes to determine effectiveness of training and performance of the training program itself are in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Update of training program and material is linked to management of change process.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 25
Element 9 – Section 675(1)(i) standards and SOPSafety standards and standard operation procedures applied, or to be applied, in each stage of the plant
Item Compliance ApplicationAll standards applicable to the plant are identified and plant has been checked for compliance.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Deviations from preferred standards are justified by risk assessments.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Has the drill rig been third party tested and certified? CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Drilling related plant
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
All standard operation procedures (SOPs) that could affect safety and health are identified.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
How many SOPs does the company have for routine work? CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 26
Development of SOPs is undertaken with consultation of operating plant employees.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The SOPs covers both abnormal and normal operation. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The SOPs covers: Critical operating parameters and safe operating limits Details of the consequences of exceeding the limits and
actions to be taken to should they be exceeded.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Processes are in place for checking use of the SOPs. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Process for review and update is documented and in place. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 27
SOPs for well completion equipment are in place Operating plant performing work over operations
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/PEvidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Permit to work systems are documented and in place for activities such as: welding and other hot work, cold work, electrical work,
entry and work in confined spaces, working over water, diving operations etc.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Are the permits to work closed out at the end of each shift? (Recommended practice)
Has the permit filled out correctly and completely?
Was a copy of the permit and supporting certificates posted on the operation day board at the workplace?
Was the permit and supporting certificates correctly authorised and signed by the Permit Issuing Officer?
Was the permit and supporting certificates within validity period?
Was the specified work undertaken within the scope of the Permit?
Were the associated certificates completed correctly?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Does the company use JSAs / JHA etc. Does it cover: Are there various risk control protocols e.g. SLAM, JSAs
(including triggers for on-the-job JSA), Have any additional hazards associated with the job
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 28
been effectively Communicated to all persons undertaking the work (e.g.
JSA, Toolbox)? Is the JHA sufficient for the task being performed?Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 29
Element 10 – Section 675(1)(j) control systemsControl systems including, for example, alarm systems, temperature and pressure control systems and emergency shutdown systems
Item Compliance ApplicationControl systems that could affect safety are clearly identified.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Training and education programs in these systems are in place and used.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Calibration, maintenance and testing processes are in place and documented.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Emergency shutdown activation is suitably located. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
If required, what type of remote emergency shut down does the company use?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Evidence
Additional emergency shutdown device is remotely located. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/PEvidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 30
Element 11 – Section 675(1)(k) machinery and equipmentMachinery and equipment relating to, or that may affect the safety of the plant
Item Compliance ApplicationPurchasing/acquisition process has risk assessment process including assessment of designer/ importer/manufacturer quality control systems and the Act s. 696 obligations.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Installation of equipment is certified as per s697 of the Act. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
All safety critical machinery and equipment is identified and documented to allow for traceability and maintenance.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Maintenance and testing procedures for this machinery and equipment are in place and used.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 31
Education and awareness program is in place to ensure employees understand consequences of the equipment not operating correctly.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The equipment and machinery, which are clearly identified as critical, are included in relevant training and maintenance programs and procedures.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 32
Element 12 – Section 675(1)(l) emergency plansEmergency equipment, preparedness and procedures
Item Compliance ApplicationEmergency plans and procedures are in place and include:Descriptions of potential scenarios as appropriate, such as gas escapes, blowouts, explosions, fires (including bushfires), critical equipment failure, trapped/missing people, flooding, cyclones, power failure, security threat, road/rail transport incidents
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The response procedures for the potential scenarios have been developed?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Procedures for safe evacuation and the accounting of all employees, contractors and visitors
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Roles and responsibilities of employees in the execution of the plan
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Training of all personnel in the their roles CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Frequency of drills and emergency exercises: When was the last exercise conducted?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Universal
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 33
What type of exercise was the drill about?
Was any report on the effectiveness of the exercise documented?
Y/N/P
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Are there processes in place that ensure review of emergency procedures occurs regularly or whenever significant changes are made
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Emergency and rescue equipment that is on hand and maintained CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Training in the use of emergency and rescue equipment CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Contingency plans are in place for: Incapacitation of emergency response personnel?
Communications failure
Inaccessibility of primary control centre
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Does the company have the contact details of the emergency helicopter – if applicable
CompliesYes/No/Part
Universal
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 34
Y/N/PDoes the company have dedicated helipads or temporary positions at every site with known GPS coordinates – if applicable
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 35
Element 13 – Section 675 1)(m) communication systemsCommunication systems including, for example, emergency communication systems
Item Compliance ApplicationThe system (including medium, timelines and document control) is developed in accordance with the objectives of the communication and the risk involved (i.e. one or more media may be used).
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Communication and consultation processes are integrated into all processes and systems across the entire management system.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
New or changing risks are communicated to relevant parts of workforce?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Information from outside the organisation (e.g. safety alerts) is received, identified and communicated to people within the organisation who need it?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Internal communication systems and their operation are documented during normal operational activities and during emergencies.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 36
External communication processes during emergencies, including methods of calling emergency services, are documented and notification of agencies, such as the Petroleum and Gas Inspectorate, are made as statutorily required.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
All employees responsible for external communication are identified.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 37
Element 13A – Section 675(1)(ma) management of changeA process for managing change including a process for managing any change to plant, operating procedures, organisational structure, personnel and the safety management plan
Item Compliance ApplicationThe Management of Change (MOC) documentation must be agreed by appropriate personnel, technical, safety, environmental and economical and final approval to be received by one manager overseeing the operations. Does a formal documented procedure exist to manage change throughout the SMP
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Does the process have the following steps documented: Appraisal
Approval
Verification
Documentation
Training
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
An implementation plan/program must be documented. The plan/programme may include purchasing, work planning, contractors, supervision etc
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Update all relevant documentation such as product specifications, operating procedures, control logic documentation, alarm trips schedules, drawings and manuals, pressure test certificates, , training records, etc. Trace and record the different changes with their date of change
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 38
Does evidence exist that ensures that affected employees and contractors are trained on the impact of the change prior to the restart of the changed process
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Does the MOC procedure cover, at a minimum, the following: Definition of what constitutes a change or modification
Authorisation process for the intended changes
Documentation of the change
Safety implications/assessment of risk associated with the change
Communication processes to ensure details of the change are appropriately disseminated and training provided as necessary
Post change review.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 39
Element 14 – Section 675(1)(n) implement, monitor and reviewThe mechanism for implementing, monitoring and reviewing and auditing safety policies and safety management plans
Item Compliance ApplicationImplementation plan for safety management plans and systems is in place, including monitoring mechanism to ensure the plan is followed.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Processes to monitor effectiveness and ensure regular review of the safety management plan/system, are in place and used.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Triggers for review of safety management plan/system are in place and include: Stipulated review periods
The setting or amendment of relevant safety codes, requirements or standards
An event or incident relevant to the plant
Changes to the plant that could result in altered risk levels. (This should be linked to the management of change process.)
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Monitoring processes are in place particularly for major hazards and behaviour where human error is a significant risk.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 40
Audit processes are established to monitor effectiveness of the safety management plan/system.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Audit processes are established to monitor compliance with the safety management plan/system.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Corrective action process is in place and operating to rectify deficiencies found during the audit processes.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Timetables for rectification of deficiencies are part of the corrective action process, with specific persons nominated responsible.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Audits are conducted by competent, appropriately trained people. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Schedule of audits are in place and monitored. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 41
System improvements are identified by methods such as external benchmarking, systemic review of incident and/or performance data, internal and external audit.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 42
Element 15 - Section 675(1)(p) key performance indicatorsKey performance indicators to be used to monitor compliance with the plan and this Act
Item Compliance ApplicationKey performance indicators are in place including: Injury and incident statistics
Audit performance measures
Level of corrective actions completed
Key activities identified in the safety management plan (completed and outstanding)
Level of completion of the training plan
Level of completion of planned emergency exercises.
Measures of quality of processes would be useful.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
A clear and effective method of gathering, analysing and reporting performance information is in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Response times to emergencies in the public arena are measured. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Annual safety report produced to review compliance against SMP, identify any major risk and report any hazards related to future coal mining.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 43
Element 16 - Section 675(1)(q)(i)&(ii) investigation(I) Mechanisms for the investigation, recording and review of incidents at the plant
Item Compliance ApplicationProcedures are in place to identify report and investigate incidents and near misses.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Processes are in place to ensure investigation teams are led by appropriately trained and competent people.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The investigation team should be determined in accordance with the scale and nature of the incident (risk assessment could be applied here particularly where community or public issues may apply).
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Does the Investigation identify control measures or system failures to prevent recurrence of any potential outcomes from the incident?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Corrective and preventative actions resulting from investigations are managed in a corrective action process including review and communication to workforce.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The corrective action process has timetables for completion of Complies Universal
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 44
actions. Yes/No/PartY/N/P
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Specific people are identified and held responsible for completion of the actions.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Processes to ensure prescribed incidents that require notification to the Petroleum and Gas Inspectorate per schedule 2 of the P&G Reg are in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
People are nominated to ensure the notification to the Inspectorate occurs.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
(ii) Mechanisms for implementing recommendations from an investigation or review of an incident at the plantProcedures (SOP) are in place that require the development and implement an action plan of investigation finding and outcomes
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Specific persons within the company are appointed to complete specific action identified from the finding of the investigations.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 45
Action plans are closed out within the specified time frame CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Does the company develop information safety alerts / bulletins to advise the employees of the outcomes of any investigations?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Has the outcomes of the incident investigation process been communicate to the OHS&W Committee
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Are processes in place to monitor improvements arising from the recommendations and urgent remedial actions
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Has follow up been scheduled to ensure remediation activities are effectively managed and continue to improve
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Has a review of any the existing controls been implemented into workplace operations, as relevant.
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 46
Element 17 – Section 675(1)(r) records managementRecord management including, for example, all relevant approvals, certificates of compliance and other documents required under this Act
Item Compliance ApplicationRecord management process is documented and in place including control of: Approvals, certificates of compliance, licenses, training records,
compliance directions, safety meetings and maintenance records.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:Assessment/Comments:
Documents are secure but available for inspection. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Version control of documentation is in place as appropriate. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Section 697 or 734 compliance certificates are in place for all necessary plant and equipment.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Submissions and s733 certificates in place for Type B devices CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 47
Element 18 – Section 675(1)(s) Work Health & Safety Act 2011To the extent that, because of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011, Schedule 1, Part 2, Division 1, section 2, that Act does not apply to a place or installation at the plant, details, including codes and standards adopted, addressing all relevant requirements under that Act that would, other than for that section, apply
Item Compliance ApplicationPart 5 of the WH&S Act:Workplace consultative arrangements are in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Part 5 of the WH&S Act:The process for workforce involvement in workplace inspections, incident investigations and workplace changes in health and safety matters is in place and documented.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Section 246 of the WH&S Reg:Registrable equipment such as boilers, pressure vessels, air conditioners, cooling towers and cranes are identified and managed to at least meet the standard for registration in accordance with.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Does the SMP comply with Chapter 4 of the WH&S Reg in relation to Hazardous work (5 parts)
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 48
Part 4.1 of the WH&S Reg:Processes are in place to prevent exposure of operators to excessive noise including: Personal monitoring programs Noise level determinations Assessment of mitigation controls.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Part 4.2 of the WH&S Reg:Processes are in place to reduce the effects of manual handling and ergonomics.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Part 4.3 of the WH&S Reg:All confined spaces as per AS 2865 are identified and processes are in place to mitigate the risks from confined spaces.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Part 4.4 of the WH&S Reg:Processes are in place to ensure the risk of falling or working at heights is minimised.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Part 4.5 of the WH&S Reg:Processes are in place to ensure operators of cranes, dozers, excavators, forklifts boiler operators, riggers and scaffolders are competent and at a standard at least equivalent to that required for a licence under the WH&S Reg.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 49
Chapter 5 of the WH&S Reg:Processes in place to ensure machinery guarding, operational controls, emergency stops and warning devices are in place to control the risks.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Chapter 6 of the WH&S Reg:Processes are in place to ensure all excavation work is risk assessed.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Chapter 7 of the WH&S Reg:All hazardous substances at the plant are identified and MSDSs (Material safety data sheets) are available.
Risk to health from these substances is assessed with control and review processes are in place.
Health surveillance programs are in place as required, particularly in relation to benzene and crystalline silica.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 50
Element 19 - Section 675(1)(t) major hazard facilityIf the operating plant is, under the NOHSC standard, a major hazard facility each matter not mentioned in section (1)(b) to (r) that is provided for under chapters 6 to 10 of that standard
Item Compliance ApplicationDoes the company have the Inspectorates contact details displayed within their SMP
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The safety report contains all of the requirements of the P&G Act
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional matter not in the P&G Act CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 51
Element 20 - Section 675(1)(u) another mater under a regulationAnother matter described under a regulationSection 59A P&G Reg – Particular risk assessment for drilling near coal mining areas
Item Compliance ApplicationSpecific risk assessment has been undertaken of potential hazards from drilling at this type of location, including uncontrolled drill string movement, influx of gas under pressure.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Extent and accuracy of mine working information (maps, surveys etc.) is understood and fully considered in risk assessment.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Documented controls are implemented to manage identified risks.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 52
Section 59B P&G Reg – Requirement for identification of, and controls for, ignition sources for safety management plan
All Ignition sources or potential ignition sources have been identified
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Controls have been put in place to manage the risk from sources of ignition.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Section 59C P&G Reg – Standard operating procedures for well completion equipment
Manufactures instructions for installing, operating and maintaining well completion equipment is available.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Documentation to provide evidence that a trial run of the production tubing hanger is being completed.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Documentation to provide evidence that an appropriately qualified person verifies that the well completion equipment is installed correctly.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 53
Section 59D P&G Reg – Lower flammable limit alarm levels for unplanned or uncontrolled gas release
The details of each relevant gas that could be released from the operating plant.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
The lower flammable limit alarm level for unplanned or uncontrolled release of each relevant gas.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 54
Element 21 – various legislative obligationsVarious legislative obligations
Item Compliance ApplicationS.676 of the P&G Act:Plan availability is commensurate with plant location and nature of activities and
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Relevant parts of plan are available where required e.g. SOPs, emergency procedures.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
S.699A of the P&G Act:Identification that the operator must not carry out activities if there is an unacceptable level of risk to a person or plant at an adjacent of or overlapping coal mining operation, petroleum tenure or GHG tenure.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
S.54 of the P&G Reg:Drilling operating plant must be fit for purpose, comply with all requirements of the P&G Act and be equipped to undertake reasonable remedial measures for an unplanned event.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 55
S.54A – 54E of the P&G Reg:The operator of an operating plant must comply with additional obligations for operators of drilling related operating plant including emergency shut down devices, risk assessment and training for well completion activities, requirements for job safety analysis and training, and well bore pressure and flaring requirements.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
S.54AAA of the P&G Reg:A CSG tenure holder must ensure that all persons to whom the construction and abandoning code applies complies with the code.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
S.66 – 72 of the P&G Reg:The operator of an operating plant must comply with the safety provisions and safety requirements relating to coal mining and/or future coal mining.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
S.708A of the P&G Act:The operator of an operating plant must ensure that they comply with all safety requirements
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
S.696 of the P&G Act:Documentation to prove that designers, importers, manufactures and suppliers are ensuring that the plant complies with safety requirements.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 56
S.61a of the P&G Reg:Documentation to prove that the manufacturers of well head equipment have prepared and supplied the instructions for the well head.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
S.697 of the P&G Act:Installation of equipment is certified as complying with the safety requirements or if there is a safety risk, not to be operated and notice provided to the operator.
CompliesYes/No/PartY/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
S.698 of the P&G Act:Owner to ensure that the person operating the operating plant has the necessary competencies to operate the plant.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Employees are aware of general obligations (s699, s702–4) and safety implications of not complying.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 57
Elements 22-26 relate only to coal seam gas
Element 22 – Section 65(1)(a) (Reg) Stimulation of CSG on Coal MiningImpacts of stimulation activities on safe and efficient coal mining
Item Compliance ApplicationAll proposed well stimulation activities are identified and described.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Risk assessment of potential impact on mining has been undertaken.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Strata characteristics and stress regime data are included.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Similar simulation information has been considered and documented.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Acceptable Items
Non-Compliant Issues
Opportunities for Improvement
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 58
Element 23 – Section 65(1)(b) (Reg) Additional risks to a Coal MineAdditional risks that may be arise by operating in or adjacent to a coal mining lease
Item Compliance ApplicationRisk assessment considers: additional risks due to location and potential
overlap or impact of activities (e.g. vehicle interaction, site access, gas and water migration)
hazard guide (schedule 4 of Regulation).
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Documented procedures, controls and other measures to mitigate/minimise identified risks are in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 59
Element 24 – Section 388 potential risks to safe and efficient miningAssessment and mitigation of particular potential risks related to safe and efficient mining of coal
Item Compliance ApplicationAll activities that may impact on safe and efficient coal mining or future mining have been identified and documented. Has hazard guide schedule 4 of Regulation been considered?
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Specific risk assessment of identified petroleum activities that impact on safe and efficient coal mining or future mining.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Consultation undertaken with relevant coal or oil shale mining tenement holder as required under s. 386 and SMP amended accordingly where feasible.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Documented procedures, controls and other measures to mitigate identified risks to an acceptable level of risk are in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 60
Element 25 – Section 705A-C Principal Hazard Management PlanA Principal Hazard Management Plan requirement
Item Compliance ApplicationConsultation with coal mining lease holder has occurred.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Reasonable provisions are included in plan. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Triggers/effects/changes to be monitored have been identified.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Response procedures, times and action are documents and procedures are in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 61
Reporting requirements are documented and procedures are in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Monitoring data is documented. CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 62
Element 26 – other legislative obligations – CSGSection 236 - coordination arrangementOther legislative obligations - coal seam gas
Item Compliance ApplicationCoordination arrangement agreements/obligations are identified.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Coordination arrangement agreements/obligations are included in SMP.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Review/monitoring procedures are in place to ensure compliance with coordination arrangement.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Reporting obligations with respect to metal hazards in wells, stimulation and cementing information and other activities that may impact on future safe and efficient mining of coal are met or processes exist to provide information to tenure holder where obligation lies with them.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 63
SOP with respect to drilling horizontal wells should clearly identify that steel casing cannot be used, and slotted liners are required.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SOP is in place with respect to proposed best endeavours to remove prescribed equipment from wells and surveying any prescribed equipment left in the well.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Documented procedure is in place for surveying, recording and reporting down hole drilling hazards.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SOP exists with respect o cementing voids created by stimulation activities including procedures for documenting and reporting details.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 64
Well abandonment SOP meets Act and Regulation requirements.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
SOP for surveying wells in accordance with Act and Reg requirements is in place.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
If exemptions from regulatory requirements have been applied for and approved, evidence of approval exists and SOPs have been modified and noted accordingly.
CompliesYes/No/Part
Y/N/P
Universal
Evidence source/SMP reference:
Assessment/Comments:
Additional information
SafeOP for petroleum and gas – Part B – Self Audit Tool 65