![Page 1: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Roberto Torena CristobalCommunity Facilitator
eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact
16th June 2010
![Page 2: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• What does eAccessibility mean?
• Background
• Objective
• Scope
• Challenge and required improvements• Performance• Accessibility and usability• Functionalities of the community tools
• Opportunities of the eAccessibility community • Policy• Monitoring and impact• Practice
Contents
![Page 3: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What does eAccessibility mean?
![Page 4: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• 2007. Start of INREDIS research project. Led by Technosite, with a duration of 4 years and a budget of €23.6M, it carries out research in the field of accessible and interoperable technologies (http://www.inredis.es/).
• 2009. INREDIS scientific director launches the INREDIS community in ePractice.
• 2010. The INREDIS community turns into the “eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact” community.
• Openness to members beyond INREDIS consortium• Augmentation of the scope to cover new topics (e.g. policies, impact measurement, etc.)
Background
![Page 5: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• “eAccessibility means overcoming the technical barriers and difficulties that people with disabilities, including many elderly people, experience when trying to participate on equal terms in the information society.” (*)
• Beyond the focus on people with disabilities, eAccessibility is about good interfaces that make possible for all people, regardless of their abilities, to use and take advantage of technology.
• This community seeks to become a forum for exchanging knowledge and experiences on all aspect relating to eAccessibility.
(*) quoted from the Communications "Towards an Accessible Information Society", COM(2008) 804
Objective
![Page 6: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Its scope is the eAccessibility field, notably:
• Policy. Initiatives from public authorities, such as legislation, standards or subsidy schemes.
• Monitoring and impact. Indicators, surveys, analysis of impact, business models, etc.
• Practice. Relevant experiences not falling under any of the two previous categories, projects, technological solutions, trends, etc.
Scope
![Page 7: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Acknowledgements:
Challenge and required improvements
![Page 8: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• The major challenge for the community is a low activity of the community members, thus leading to a loss of interest and consequently loss of members.
• In addition to the dinamisation activities of the community facilitators, some improvements in the epractice portals are required in:
• Performance• Accessibility and usability• Functionalities of the community tools
Challenge and required improvements (1/4)
![Page 9: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Increase speed dramatically. It may be the most important point in order to avoid discouraging the participation.
• Information sometimes disappears. E.g. The page "learn more about this community" in the e-accessibility community.
Challenge and required improvements (2/4). Performance
![Page 10: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Main accessibility barriers:• Validation errors• Inaccessible frames• Device dependence• Text alternatives for images• Section headings• Absolute units of measure in CSS• Links not meaningful out of context• Inaccessible edit controls• Poor contrast
• Effects of poor accessibility• Loss of credibility• Reduced participation• Message not communicated clearly
Challenge and required improvements (3/4). Accessibility and usability
![Page 11: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Community blogs with the same functionalities that the central blog (real editing facilities, creating lists, real hyperlinks, adding images, etc.)
• Otherwise adding blog posts to the general blog more attractive than adding blog posts to a community
• Add an existing post from the portal blog to your community blog. (Available on release 3?)
• Editing facilities available in all description creation pages (e.g. community description pages, shared resources, etc.).
• Facilitate the information retrieval, e.g. by a list of most popular tags when creating a post, filtering by multiple tags, a complete list of available tags, etc.
Challenge and required improvements (4/4). Functionalities of the community tools
![Page 12: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• The improvement in the portal performance, accessibility and usability, and in the communities’ functionalities will lead to:
• An increment in the activity of the community members
• An increment in the interest of the portal to potential new members
• An improvement in the awareness of the portal among key stakeholders
• Turn epractice into a reference portal in eAccessibility in Europe
Opportunities of the eAccessibility community (1/4)
![Page 13: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Diffusion of best practices in policy initiatives and instruments to advance accessibility to ICTs
• Dissemination of EC initiatives (e.g. Mandate 376 on public procurement policy and practice for accessible ICT products and services)
• Discussion of the policy differences in: time scales, web sites addressed, legal and non-legal intervention approaches, monitoring, administrative ruling, certification schemes, court cases, etc.
• Dissemination and discussion of relevant studies, e.g.:• Study on Monitoring eAccessibility (http://www.eaccessibility-monitoring.eu/)
Opportunities of the eAccessibility community (2/4). Policy
![Page 14: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Discussion of key issues:• Accessibility evaluation and conformance assessment of WCAG 2.0• Benchmarking methodologies• Pros and cons of third party certification vs. self declaration
• Raising awareness of the business case for eAccessibility
• Discussion on the impact of the eAccessibility at micro and macroeconomic level.
• Dissemination and discussion of relevant studies, e.g.:• Study on Monitoring eAccessibility• Study on economic assessment for improving eAccessibility services and products (http://www.eaccessibility-impacts.eu/)• Study on internal market for Inclusive and assistive ICT
Opportunities of the eAccessibility community (3/4). Monitoring and impact
![Page 15: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• Diffusion and discussion of technological trends and best practices to design with accessibility criteria:
• Emerging Web 2.0 services • Content Management Systems (CMS) and Authoring Tools• Digital TV and interactive TV• Total Conversation solutions • Fixed and Mobile telephony • Self-service terminals (including, ATMs, information kiosks, ticketing and vending machines)• Assistive Technologies HW&SW• Etc.
• Dissemination and discussion of relevant projects, e.g.:• REACH 112 (http://www.reach112.eu/)• AEGIS (http://www.aegis-project.eu/)• ACCESSIBLE (http://www.accessible-eu.org/)
Opportunities of the eAccessibility community (4/4). Practice
![Page 16: Roberto Torena Cristobal Community Facilitator eAccessibility practice, policy, monitoring and impact 16 th June 2010](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051613/551536ee55034673228b5a3a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Join us!!!! http://www.epractice.eu/community/eaccessibility