ROAD ACCIDENT FUNDVENDOR BRIEFING SESSION RFP: RAF/ 2012 /00005
Presenter: Anna Mosupyoe and Jacquie Sobantu
Date: 26 January 2012
Time: 10:00
Overview
Background
Evaluation Criteria
Submission of bid responses
Disqualification of bids
Procurement Administration
Purpose of the RFP
Questions and Answers
Page 3[Insert presentation title]
Background
RFP: RAF/2012/00005:REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: APPOINTMENT OF A RESEARCH AGENCY THAT WILL CONDUCT REASEARCH ON BEHALF OF ROAD ACCIDENT FUND FOR A PERIOD OF 3 YEARS
Advertised on 13 January 2012
Closing on 06 February 2012
Page 4[Insert presentation title]
Evaluation Criteria
•Evaluation will be based on 90/10 PPPFA system
Criteria Points
Price 90
Participation goals 10
Total 100
Page 5[Insert presentation title]
Evaluation Criteria
Mandatory requirements
The service provider must be SAMARA accredited or ISO 900 accredited.
Please attach SAMRA accreditation or ISO 900 accreditation as proof that the agency is accredited.
Page 6[Insert presentation title]
Functional criteria Weightings
Experience of the Company Please provide RAF with the portfolio of research work done in three (3) different industries: Government, Private and public entities. The references must consist of two industries of the listed three. The reference should include the following: Company nameContact personContact person e-mail address and contact number.
10%
Evaluation Criteria (continue)
Page 7[Insert presentation title]
Evaluation Criteria continueFunctional criteria Weightings
Resources ExperienceThe service provider must submit the CV’s of the project team that will be used in the project and indicate were they will be utilized. The project team should consist of the personnel that have the relevant marketing research qualifications and minimum of 3 years in conducting research.
Research approach and solution methodology Using the case study brief provided in paragraph 3.2 on page 46 of this document.Demonstrate both qualitative and quantitative techniques and the solution to RAF.
10%
30%
Page 8[Insert presentation title]
Evaluation Criteria continueFunctional criteria Weightings
Sample Methodology Using the case study brief provided in paragraph 3.2 on page 46 of this document. Provide RAF with sample methods, sample structure, weightings and validation techniques.
Insights The service provider must illustrate how insights and recommendations are derived from the data sourced.
20%
10%
Presentations Shortlisted companies will be invited to RAF for presentation
20%
Total 100%
Page 9[Insert presentation title]
Original signed bid document
4 hard copies
Submitted in sealed envelopes
Each schedule must be clearly distinguish, indexed and all pages numbered
•Submission of bid responses
Page 10[Insert presentation title]
Disqualification of bids
Bidders shall be disqualified if they fail to:
Submit a valid and original tax clearance certificate
Complete questionnaires in full
Submit true and correct information
Comply with mandatory requirements
Comply with prescribed response format
Page 11[Insert presentation title]
Administration
RFP Closing Date: 06 February 2012 @11H00Venue: RAF Menlyn Reception 38 Ida street Menlo Park PretoriaBid responses sent by courier must reach the reception at least 36 (thirty
six) hours before the closing date to be deposited into the bid boxSubmission Register must be signed at the reception by bidder when
submitting bid documentsLate bids will not be considered
All queries must be forwarded to [email protected] and clarification of technical issues will close not later than 27
January 2012 @ 11H00.
Important note:Please ensure that the attendance register has been signedName of company Contact details
Understanding Research
•To understand the dynamics and scope of the Road Accident Funds risks and opportunities. Facilitating growth, knowledge and strategy
Page 13[Insert presentation title]
Objectives
• Research Partner
• Provide Strategic direction
• Actionable insights
Page 14[Insert presentation title]
Research Plan
Brand:Brand Equity: Internal
Brand Equity: External
Road Safety
Stakeholder Perception
Stakeholder:
Employee Attitude
Change Management
Corporate:
Research Target Market
Employee
Public & Stakeholders
Employees
General Public
Stakeholders
Service:Customer Satisfaction
Service Excellence
Living Core Values
Claimants & Lawyers
General Public
Employees
Segmentation:Market Profiling Public
Customer Service Index
Communication
Objectives
Measure brand awareness, value, identity, image & resonance
Understand how employees think & feel about the RAF
Relationship between communication, leadership & corporate culture
Improve quality & delivery of road safety education, training & Communication
Understand RAF’s stakeholders perception & how to improve it
Action Standards
Inform Marketing & Brand Strategy
Human Capital Strategy Organisational Health
Road Safety Education Strategy
Value proposition
Engagement Strategy
Measure service values
Identify market segments,
Behavioural & media consumption patterns
Inform Marketing, Brand, Media & Communication Strategy
Assess resonance & acceptance
Benchmarking against Industry
Page 16[Insert presentation title]
Case Study Brief: Road Safety
• Target Market− School Children
− Male & Female
− Primary & Secondary School
− Age 8-17yrs
− Urban & Rural− Pedestrians
− Male & Female
− Age 16-60yrs
− Urban & Rural− Drivers & Commuters
− Male & Female
− Age 18-60yrs
− Urban & Rural− National
− Gauteng, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Eastern Cape, Northern Cape, Western Cape, Mpumalanga, Limpopo, Free State, North West
Page 17[Insert presentation title]
Case Study Brief: Road Safety
• Research Objective− The primary objective is to identify how to improve the quality and delivery of road safety education, training and
communication to find effective ways to raise the status of road safety education.
− Specifically the study is aimed at establishing the following: Determine awareness and perception of road safety on the public roads in South Africa. Identify and understand the attitude and behaviour towards road safety. Identify possible barriers in understanding and practicing road safety. Determine the expectations for road safety initiatives. Identify the most effective ways to ensure that road safety education is more appealing and understood.
Page 18[Insert presentation title]
Expectation
• Demanding organisation
• In midst of transformation
• Insights into strategy
Page 19[Insert presentation title]
Thank you
Questions and Answers