![Page 1: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“Resource Dependency and Diversity: From
Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)”
Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural
ResourcesCornell University
![Page 2: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Road Map… Building blocks: Bill’s work on resource
dependence and well being of rural communities
The evolution of inquiry Comparisons New indicators Methodological and definitional challenges Changing reality conditions in rural places Distribution issues: “moving beyond the mean” Definitions: well being + dependence
A couple of ‘half baked’ ideas
![Page 3: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Some Key Pieces…
Social Impact Assessment (ARS 1986) Addictive economies (Rural Sociology 1992) Boomtown’s Youth (ASR, 1984) Criminal behavior in boomtowns (Rural Soc
1991) 40 years of spotted owls: (Sociological
Perspectives 1998)
![Page 4: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
“Well, duh…indeed??”
Here we go again…Enter the Marcellus
Shale…
![Page 5: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Major Natural Gas Shale Basins
![Page 6: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
How is the Marcellus Different than Traditional
Gas Development? Deeper than historic wells Horizontal Drilling Non-traditional Formation Requires Hydro-fracturing
to allow gas to travel in rock
Takes longer, requires more people, more resources
Brand new boomtowns!
![Page 7: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
On the other hand…
Maybe we have made some progress after all…discourse
is broader
![Page 12: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Work Evolves Canadian Forest Service
Years… Convergence of RD/WB equation with
Montreal Process C&I and CCFM Initial curiosity re some basic questions
on forest-dependent communities Comparisons
Across industries Across regions Across indicators of well being: Over time Within communities
![Page 13: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
More…
Definitions Well-being
‘process’ indicators and subjective indicators of well being Locally derived indicators
Resource dependence employment in forest harvest/processing sector
Jobs versus income % versus base
Employment in non-timber sectors –non timber forest products, forest related tourism,
Non-employment dependence
Transitioning rural landscapes: tourism dependence?
![Page 14: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
At some point, this “evolution” started
spinning off into the “half-baked ideas”
stage
![Page 15: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Half-baked idea #1…
Can resource dependence be
“positive” instead of negative?
![Page 16: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The terms and findingsof resource dependence:
Terms: “addiction, reliance, craving” imply vulnerability or weakness
So do a lot of the findings, when Measured (mostly) via arms length economic
indicators: employment or income tied to the extraction,
processing, and distribution of natural resources. Conceptually and methodologically at
issue… dependence as “psychological state” conflated
with arms length aggregate indicators Who depends? Do counties (our usual unit of
analysis really “depend”? Or do people depend?
![Page 17: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
A positive dependence?
Another class of synonyms for psychological dependence: trust, confidence, belief, faith that imply something positive: dependence versus dependability?
Can this base of confidence--wherever it comes from--give a community a stronger sense of agency, and resilience?
![Page 18: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Need to examine actions and
psychologies at multiple scales
.
![Page 19: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
A conceptual typology of dependence
Individual Community/Aggregate
Psychological(pos / neg)
Attitudes:
Negative: Risk aversion, unwillingness to change
Positive: attachment, biophilia
Social representations, community identity:
Negative: “we are” backward, with few other options, stuck.
Positive: shared vision, collective identity, community as special place
Behavioral(pos / neg)
Individual actions:
Negative: disinvestments in human capital based on faith in industry or lack of awareness of options
Positive: use “faith” in the resource as a launching pad for creativity, entrepreneurship, etc.
Secondary data: indicators of community action
Negative: disinvestments in alt development strategies
Positive: community-driven initiatives: resource based development strategies, CBRM
![Page 20: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Core of emerging research…
What affects where in the typology an individual and/or a community is likely to fall?
Based on: What is depended on: characteristics of the
resource Level of analysis: a particular community, a
set of relations between communities; a region?
The type of indicator: social psych or secondary data?
The “type” of location: conduct research in a wider variety of settings that include the rural-urban interface and major metropolitan centers.
Variation within a level
![Page 21: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Half-baked idea, #2…
Resource Dependence and Diversity…?
![Page 22: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Economic diversity and rural communities
Diversity counter-posed to resource dependence, single industry towns (“resource curse” of overspecialization) “Resource dependent communities need to
diversify” Rural development plans…diversity assumed
to… Mitigate population loss, poverty during economic
downturn (general or sector-specific) Help achieve stability, growth, and/or resilience Contrary to economic theory of comparative
advantage and specialization?
![Page 23: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
‘Borrowed’ from Ecology: Diversity ~ Resilience?
In ecology, more diverse systems assumed to be better positioned to respond to unspecified system shocks Respond to “unknown unknowns”: diversity as
risk reduction strategy when uncertainty is high.
![Page 24: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
A few issues to discuss…That are pretty core to
science Measurement: even ecology hasn’t
settled on the ‘best’ way to measure diversity
Evidence: that diversity = resilience is a little sketchy, even in ecology
Translation: between ecology and social-economic systems
![Page 25: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Parameters of Diversity in Ecology
translate in your mind a rough analogy between
ecological and economic diversity
Diversity at what level? Species level (most common) Subspecies level: genetic / phenotypical Beyond species: interactions/functional relationships
(emergent) What geography?
Alpha (within given habitat) Beta (diversity of habitats—landscape---transition zones
between habitats) Gamma (geographical: region or larger)
How to count? Richness: number of species present (‘counting’—doesn’t
take into account how distributed) Relative abundance (species evenness): how are the
individuals in a population distributed across species? Niche occupation Rarity/scarcity—not all species ‘count’ equally
![Page 26: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Moving to Economic Diversity
subtitle… ‘fun with analogies’ “Richness” : total number of different
economic sectors represented in a given region
“Evenness”: relative distribution across sectors, of employment and/or income
Diversity versus Diversification: Most empirical work looks at the effect of
diversity (state) rather the process of diversification
Are diverse places different (vis a vis outcomes) than diversifying places?
![Page 27: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Pushing the ecological analogies
a little farther… “Endangered” species/sectors: ecology privileges rare species: does this make sense for: Economic sectors? Types of communities?
“Exotic versus native” species/sectors We privilege species that “belong” rather than those
that have been introduced (or have expanded their range at the expense of another).
Analogy for economic sectors? seems that in community development, we usually call this
“innovation” and are supremely untroubled by it
Habitat boundaries and system ‘openness’ (species move through habitats)
![Page 28: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
What does the economic diversity
literature miss? ‘Distance’ or functional differentiation:
compounding versus offsetting effects: social changes producing linked effects
Hierarchies among species/sectors ~ trophic levels: obviously goofy to say there ought to be as many
grizzly bears as mice same (but less obvious) with economic sectors?
Ignore regional differences in the capacity to maintain diversity Some ecosystems “naturally” more diverse than
others (e.g., arctic vs the tropics); is the same true for socio-economic systems?
![Page 29: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Another key difference: Community diversity: potential for better
calibration, are more diverse places “better” places by a wider range of criteria. Ecosystems = problems with endogeneity: survival,
expansion/encroachment: “better systems” manage to persist and expand their range
Similar criteria invoked re human communities: persistence and growth, economic indicators (income,
employment, population)
Subjective indicators Are more diverse communities ‘better’ communities?
Do people enjoy them more? Are they more eager to stay? Do they more fully participate in the life of the community? Which people?
![Page 30: “Resource Dependency and Diversity: From Findings to Metaphors (and Back Again?)” Richard C. Stedman Department of Natural Resources Cornell University](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062800/56649e0b5503460f94af34f6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Thanks Bill.