1
Reforms to Budget Formulation in Uganda
The challenges of building and maintaining and a credible process
2
Why Uganda?
• Successful Reforms to Public Expenditure Management since 1990s built a credible budget process– Especially in terms of establishing Fiscal
Discipline and in Budget Formulation• More Recently, some emerging
challenges in maintaining credibility– Institutional and Governance related
3
3 Parts
• Part 1: Reforms to Public Financial Management
• Part 2: The Budget Formulation Process• Part 3: Successes, Failures and
Challenges
4
Part 1: Reforms to Public Financial ManagementSequencing, Instruments and
Institutions
5
Sequencing of ReformsEstablishing Fiscal Discipline - Introduction of Macroeconomic Framework- Cash budgeting, commitment control to reduce arrears
Improving Strategic Resource Allocation- PEAP (pre PRS), MTEF, Poverty Action Fund- Sector Working Groups, Budget Framework Paper
Improving Operational Efficiency- Internal Controls & Accounting systems, institutions and capacity- Sector level diagnostics (e.g. TrakingStudies, Value for Money Studies etc)Strengthening Legal Framework - Budgeting, Accounting, Procurement
1995
1997
2000
6
Reforms Linked to all elements of the budget cycle
Policy Based Budgeting- Stronger policy processesPRS, sector policies and strategies and associated review processes- Stronger budget formulationThe MTEF and Budget Framework Papers
Budget Execution and Accounting -Computerising PFM (IFMS)- Professionalising Accounts Cadre in Gov’t,- Procurement Reforms-Budget, Sector Reporting
External Scrutiny and Audit
- Independence & Strengthening of external audit - Support to Parliament Committees
7
Part 2: The Budget Formulation Process
The MTEF, Performance Focus
8
Sector BFP
Detailed Spending AgencyBudgets
MTEF + National
BFP
ANNUALBUDGET
Long Term Medium Term
PEAP (PRSP)
Sector Strategic
Plans
National
Short Term
(An nual)
Sector
1. Framework for linking policies & strategies to the budget using sectors
9
2. A simple sector policy & results focus
Performance Focus
Focus on agencies and inputsLine item and administrative budget
Sector Focus, with Output &
Outcome Orientation
Spending agency budgets grouped by sector (e.g. Health,
Education) where policies made
Allocations linked to the achievement of high level sector
policies & objectives in BFPNB: Formal performance / programme budgeting has not been used
10
3. The MTEF marries a Top Down and Bottom Up Process
Top-down MT resource envelopeTotal and sector resources consistent with macroeconomic stability and broad policy priorities
Bottom-up cost estimate of policyThe current and medium term cost of achieving national (sector) policy objectives in line with resources envelope
Reconciling costs with resourcesAn decision-making process that reconciles these costs and new policy ideas with available resource envelop
11
3. The MTEF marries a Top Down and Bottom Up Process
• Macroeconomic Framework: – MT projections of available
domestic and donor resources over the medium term
• MTEF Ceilings:– 3-year sector budget ceilings
consistent with macroeconomic framework & PRS/PEAP priorities.
– Ceilings presented by sector and spending agencies within that sector
Top-down MT resource envelopeMacroeconomic Framework & MTEF Ceilings - MoF
12
3. The MTEF marries a Top Down and Bottom Up Process
Bottom-up cost estimate of policy
Sector Budget Framework - Sector Working Groups
• The Sector Budget Framework Paper sets out sector MT spending plans in detail– Reviews of past
performance; – sets out sector MT policy
objectives outputs and planned activities and
– corresponding expenditures for the medium term in line with MTEF ceilings
13
3. The MTEF marries a Top Down and Bottom Up Process
Reconciling costs with resourcesThe national budget framework paperMoF, Cabinet & Parliament
• National Budget Framework Paper sets out the overall medium term budget strategy for the government– Sets out the justification for
MT macroeconomic projections; sector expenditure proposals and policy options.
– Synthesis Macro framework and sector BFPs
14
4. An Inclusive &
Consultative Process
Delegation to Sector Working Groups and Local Governments
Making Spending Agencies Responsible
Engagement of Cabinet and Parliament in Decision makingMaking it Political
Reforms led by a strong, unified Ministry of Finance & Planning
Top down establishment & enforcement of systems and rules
15
4. An Inclusive &
Consultative Process
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development
• Macroeconomic Policy Dep’t prepares Macro Framework
• Budget Directorate– Budget Policy & Evaluation Dep’t, manages
budget process and Compiles BFP & Budget– Two Departments made up of sector “Desk
Officers” who are primary liaison with sector ministries on planning & budgeting process and review sector BFP & budget submissions
Reforms led by a strong, unified Ministry of Finance & Planning
Top down establishment & enforcement of systems and rules
16
4. An Inclusive &
Consultative Process
Sector Working Groups• Coordinate the development of
the Sector BFP including– Review budget implementation and
performance – Agree sector objectives & intra
sector budget allocations• Made up of representatives from:
– Central line ministries and agencies, local gov’ts; civil society; donors; & Ministry of finance officials working on sector
Delegation to Sector Working Groups and Local Governments
Making Spending Agencies Responsible
17
4. An Inclusive &
Consultative Process
Cabinet & Parliament• Cabinet
– Reviews the BFP and Annual Budget Proposal before they are submitted to parliament
• Parliament– Budget Committee Reviews &
Comments on Sector Allocations in National Budget Framework Paper
– Detailed sectoral discussions of annual budget proposals
– Parliamentary budget office supports deliberations
Engagement of Cabinet and Parliament in Decision makingMaking it Political
18
The Consultative Budget ProcessP arliam ent
C abinet
Line M inistries/Spending Agencies/
SW G s/Donors
M FPE D
N ational B udget W orkshop-Ind icative Sector C eilings-Budget & SW G G uidelines
Preparation of SectorB FP and RevisedM TEF A llocationsw ithin the C eiling
Cab inet Approval of BFP/M TEF
Inter-m inisterial Consultations
Com pilation of N ational BFPA nd U pdated M TEF
Subm ission of Ind icativePlan/M T EF
Finalisation of BudgetA llocations/M TEF
Final B udget Approval
BudgetSpeech
Preparation of D etailedBudget Estim ates
O ct - D ec Jan - M ar Apr - June
PE R
April 1 June 15M ay 15
4. An Inclusive & Consultative Process
19
5. Integrating the local government dimension
• Districts are the main implementers of basic services in Uganda.– The BFP process is replicated through Local Government
Budget Framework Papers, prepared by districts– National policy priorities are funded at local governments via
earmarked conditional grants which appear in sector MTEF’s– Large increases in allocations to local governments, in line with
their functions• National priorities vs local discretion - getting the balance
right– ¾ of increases in local funding have come in the form of
conditional grants, which led to fragmented budgets & undermined discretion
– Since 2000 efforts to consolidate the grant system, by increasing focus on the budget, introducing discretionary development grants, and introducing flexibility in the recurrent grants system.
20
6. Integrating aid into the process and encouraging budget support
• Aid and Donors integrated into MTEF– Aid to spending agencies reflected in MTEF since 1997 – Donors part of sector working groups from the start,
which has improved information sharing– Project Aid now included in Integrated Sector Budget
Ceilings from 2003 (intention is that sectors can switch from projects to the budget without resources)
• Donor Shifts towards sector and general budget support– Increased on-budget funding and attention paid to the
budget process– Poverty Action Fund helped give credibility through
protection of budget disbursements to PRS priority areas
21
Part 3 – Successes, Failures and Challenges
Factors behind Success, and Emerging Challenges
22
A Credible Process• The MTEF is the Only Game in Town
– The first year of the MTEF is the budget– A unified calendar for the MTEF and budget
• Overall credibility of the macroeconomic framework– Fiscal aggregates have now been reliable for over a
decade (+/- 3%)• Budgetary resources are made available during
the financial year– E.g. in 2005/06 only one sector had disbursements <
95%, although there are variations by spending agency and budget type (recurrent, development)
23
Factors Behind Early Success• Strong leadership from MFPED, and willingness
to manage a transparent, consultative process: – Engagement of Cabinet; – delegation to Sectors and Sector Working Groups; and– allowed civil society and donors to take part
• Political support to: – fiscal discipline;– reallocation of resources to poverty priority areas,– sticking to the budget
• The process was demanding but kept simple– I.e. no complicated programme/performance budgeting
24
Yet, there have been gaps• Across the board, there has not been enough
focus on operationally efficiency of sector budget allocations
• Sector budget submissions are of variable quality, and some have remained weak:– Costing is not comprehensive across sectors– Weak link of allocations with policy objectives
• Harder PFM reforms started late in the reform process– Budget reporting has been on the basis of
disbursements and not expenditures• The budget is approved after the beginning of
the financial year, leading to some uncertainty
25
… and are emerging challenges• Emerging Issues
– Increasingly difficult to adhere to budget calendar, and maintain consultations
– Budget formulation becoming more routine, technical, and less strategic
– MoF is finding it increasingly difficult to maintain the rules of the game, especially during budget implementation
– Fragmentation in policies/plans (National Planning Authority, Manifesto, “Prosperity for All”, Rural Dev. Strategy)
• Underlying factors– Changes in Leadership in the MoF (political and tech.)– Change in political environment, (shift from no-party to
multi party democracy, changing policy agenda).
26
Thank You