Download - Quantitative XEDS
![Page 1: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quantitative XEDS
• Once we know what our sample consists of, we want to know how much of each element it contains
• We can investigate the relative intensity of characteristic X-ray peaks to get this information
• Current quantification techniques give reasonably accurate results, with room for improvement
![Page 2: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
• Fundamental concepts– Castaing– Cliff-Lorimer
• Practical steps– Background substraction– Determine k-factors
• Quantitative analysis
Reading: Williams and Carter, Chapter 35.1-35.8(most important: 35.1-35.4)
![Page 3: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Quantitative XEDS: Castaing
• Castaing 1951: the concentration of a present element is proportional to the intensity of the observed characteristic X-ray signal
• Since it is difficult to measure an “absolute” intensity – compare measured value to a standard
where i refers to the specimen value and (i)refers to the standard
![Page 4: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Quantitative XEDS: Castaing
K is the sensitivity factor (not constant), determined (inversely) by:
Z the atomic numberA absorption of X-rays within the specimenF fluorescence of X-rays within the specimen
The correction factor for bulk analysis is referred to as ZAF correction
![Page 5: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Quantitative XEDS
• HOWEVER…for thin samples A and F are very small and can be ignored– Sensitivity factor proportional only to Z!
• In 1975 Cliff and Lorimer showed that a standard is not needed if intensities for two elements are gathered simultaneously and compared…
![Page 6: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Cliff-Lorimer technique
kAB is another sensitivity factor, called the Cliff-Lorimer factor
![Page 7: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Ternary systems
![Page 8: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Thin-foil criterion
![Page 9: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Practical steps for quantification
• Use Kα lines where possible to avoid peak overlap
• Avoid tilt to minimize spurious X-rays• Keep the thinnest part towards the detector• Avoid diffraction conditions (see 35.3)• Collect enough counts for each of the
characteristic peaks – ideally 10000 counts above background for EACH major peak!
![Page 10: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Background substraction
• To determine peak intensities you first need to determine the intensity above background
• Bremsstrahlung X-rays decrease continuously in intensity as energy increases– This means that background may not be the same
for each peak, and must be subtracted from each one
![Page 11: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Background substraction methods
• Define a ‘window’ spanning the peak – optimum width is 1.2(FWHM), then draw a straight line across/below the peak at this point – everything below is background (35.2)
• Average the bremsstrahlung above and below the peak in the same window (35.3) – note that if there is a significant difference the sample is too thick!
• Model the background mathematically using Kramer’s Law (35.4) – used in commercial software
• Filter out the background mathematically (35.5)
![Page 12: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Background substraction methods
![Page 13: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Peak integration
• Using a windows method of background estimation: subtract the estimate background from the total intensity in the window
• Kramer’s Law: fit a Gaussian peak and integrate
• Digital filter: match standard peaks stored in a library using least-squares fitting- requires a library of stored spectra; gives a numerical measure of the fit
![Page 14: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Determining k-factors
• k-factors can be determined experimentally (using standards) or calculated from first principles
• Remember this is not a constant, but a sensitivity factor that depends on the detector, microscope, analysis conditions…
![Page 15: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Determining k-factors - experimental
• We only need to determine kAB in relation to one element. Then all other k-values can be calculated:
• Experimental k-values can be obtained from single-phase compounds
• Standard spectra must be recorded for each instrument setup
![Page 16: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Problems determining k-factors
• Existence of appropriate standard – Must be possible to make thin, uniform specimens– No or minimal X-ray absorption from all elements– These thin specimens must be stable under e-beam– Must be stoichiometric throughout the specimen– Si is a useful standard since it exists in many
minerals with other elements, but absorption is very detector-specific
![Page 17: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Determining k-factors -theoretical
The accelerating voltage strongly affects QThe atomic number affects ω, a and of course AThe peak integration method also affects aThe detector is of course also a variable (and the window)
![Page 18: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Determining k-factors - theoretical
• Experimental k-factors are not really standard (vary with standard quality, analysis conditions, peak integration routines…)
• In many cases a quick answer is required and the highest accuracy is not essential – Calculating k-factors is much easier and faster! And no less
accurate if the standard is uncertain
• Calculations for L-lines are more difficult because of overlap, unknown Q values– No data available for M lines (in most cases)
• Commericial software uses a “black-box” approach: values that are a mix of experimental and calculated, and vary with software package
![Page 20: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Zeta-factor method
• Difficulties with Cliff-Lorimer method: determining k, standard samples…
• Zeta-factor method uses pure-element standards – easy to fabricate, not changed by beam
• Major disadvantage: requires in-situmeasurement of probe current hitting specimen: this technology exists but is not yet widely implemented in TEMs
![Page 21: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Zeta-factor methods
If the beam current i can be measured and we assume that X-ray intensity is proportional to mass-thickness, ρt (here we neglect absorption and fluorescence):
aiQCNA
CIt
A
AA
ϖζ
ζρ
0
≡
=
where is the zeta factor
Note that N0 is Avogadro’s number. This expression is independent of specimen thickness, composition, and density.
We can also see that:
BB
AA
B
A
II
CC
ζζ
=
![Page 22: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Absorption correction
Recall for bulk specimens that the sensitivity factor is a function of:
Z: the efficiency with which an element generates X-rays
Absorption correction, A: X-rays travelling within the solid will have their energy reduced by absorption
Fluorescence, F: High energy X-rays excite lower energy fluorescence radiation
Fluorescence is usually a small effect and will not be considered. However for thick specimens the absorption correction must be considered.
![Page 23: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Absorption correction
If one of the elements in a sample absorbs more than another, the generated counts for that element will be lower – so C is not directly proportional to I
We can write
Here kAB is the “true” sensitivity factor (for thickness = 0) and A is the absorption correction factor.
A is a complicated expression, which is integrated over the sample thickness. It is necessary to have information about the specimen density and thickness at each analysis position, including any variations of density with thickness
B
AAB
B
A
IIAk
CC )(=
![Page 24: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Example: AuIn nanoparticle
![Page 25: Quantitative XEDS](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022030322/587b57091a28ab72038b8771/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Example: AuIn nanoparticle