Download - Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14
![Page 1: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Power of Peer Review in High School World History Classes
California World History Association Annual Conference
March 2, 2014 Dr. Scott Petri
![Page 2: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
On 2011 NAEP writing scores, 8th and 12th grade girls out-performed boys by double digits.
![Page 3: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
This gender gap is larger in writing than in reading and is most pronounced among low achieving students.
![Page 4: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
On the 2011 NAEP only 27% of 12th grade students scored at or above proficient in writing.
![Page 5: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The class of 2012 attained the lowest score (488) since 2006, on the writing portion of the SAT.
![Page 6: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Writing arguments has been found to promote greater audience awareness and syntactic complexity in HS students
Increase the use of writing-from-sources tasks which integrate reading and writing i.e., document based questions (DBQs).
![Page 7: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Students at two schools were given a series of complex writing tasks or DBQs.
• In order to measure student effort, words produced were analyzed per class.
• The mean word production numbers were compared to the averages from the first task to determine how much student effort had improved.
![Page 8: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
P 2 Non-Violence Essay
AB
CD
Cohort I DBQ Performance Sample
![Page 9: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Words produced per hour by Cohort I Students (N=105, Feb. 2012)
Mean: 186Median: 163
Low: 014High: 617
![Page 10: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Words produced per hour by Cohort I Students (N=105, May 2012)
Mean: 342Median: 315
Low: 076High: 990
![Page 11: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Increase in Word ProductionMean: 156Median: 152
Low: 062High: 373
![Page 12: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Cohort IIConsequences of the Cold War Essay
(N=29) 13 missing assignmentsLow=220Median=410High=608
![Page 13: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Cohort II DBQ Performance Summary
Class Per.
Total Student Load Low Median High
Missing/Incomplete
Didn't Compl % Compl %
P1 44 125 350 600 12 27% 73%
P2 42 220 410 608 13 31% 69%
P3 44 28 271 519 20 45% 55%
P5 44 36 250 415 21 48% 52%
P7 30 101 345 546 12 40% 60%
P8 25 52 203 405 10 40% 60%
AVG 38 94 305 516 15 39% 61%
![Page 14: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Comparing CohortsSample Size (N)
Assignment Cmplt. Rate
WPH Increase
Course Pass Rate
Course Fail Rate
Cohort 1 105 70% 156 72% 28%
Cohort 2 210 71% 193 74% 26%
Avg. # of Missing Days
Avg. # of Tardies
Missing Instrctnl Minutes
Ind. Course Grade Mean
Overall Stdnt GPA Mean
Cohort 1 9.69 7.87 912 2.62 2.04
Cohort 2 7.06 0.84 648 1.74 1.95
# of Failing Students
Failing Males
Failing Females
Cohort 1 33 22 11
Cohort 2 55 40 15
![Page 15: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Student & Teacher PerceptionsHow confident are you coming up with a thesis for a DBQ? (N=106)
How confident are you in teaching students how to write a thesis for a writing task/essay? (N=66)
![Page 16: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Student & Teacher PerceptionsHow confident are you that you know how to use a document to support your thesis? (N=106)
How confident are you in teaching students how to use evidence to support a thesis? (N=66)
![Page 17: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Student & Teacher PerceptionsHow confident are you that you can adequately explain each document? (N=106)
How confident are you in teaching students how to paraphrase/explain primary source documents? ? (N=66)
![Page 18: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Peer Review Experiment(N=116)
![Page 19: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results/Data
• Low Word Count: 14• Mean Word Count: 346• High Word Count: 730
• 14 A’s• 40 B’s• 38 C’s• 24 D’s
• 116 graded assignments• 92 proficient students (79%)• 24 non-proficient students (21%)
![Page 21: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Peer Review Activity
![Page 22: Petri cwha dbq_prsnt_3-2-14](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070322/5591a1c41a28ab9f268b470c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Contact: [email protected] for teachers willing to participate in a larger study on HS student peer review.