Download - OU Climate, Arctic & International Security
S
Climate Change, the Arctic and
International Security
With John Topping, Founder and President of the Climate Institute
A lecture for the University of Oklahoma
Inaugural Event of the Global Sustainability SeriesFebruary 19, 2013
Climate Change’s Acceleration
Source
: NA
SA
Source: NASA Image
Humanity’s Emissions are Playing a RoleGreenhouse gases & aerosols are having an impact on climate
Climate Change’s Acceleration
Poses increasing risk: enhanced sea level rise
affecting coastal areas and island nations
threat to water resources and agriculture
a realistic possibility of more extreme events; swings between floods and droughts
possible increased occurrence of severe storms (*science uncertain on tornadoes)
On a local level in recent years, The National Weather Service has determined 90.92% of Oklahoma is in D3 (extreme) and D4 (exceptional) levels. This is the worst drought Oklahoma has encountered in decades.
“Oklahomans are accustomed to cruel climate. Frigid winters and searing summers are often made more unbearable by scouring winds. But even by Oklahoma standards, it's been a year of whipsaw weather.”
- Los Angeles Times, August 24, 2011
Oklahoma’s Current Drought Conditions
Weather Events and Climate Variability
While no single weather related event — flood, drought, fire or severe storm — can be attributed to climate change, it is prudent to build climate resilience.
There is a probability that investment decisions will need to be made for water resources, agricultural and/or infrastructure planning to offset risks. National Weather
Service Weather Center in Norman places OU at center of efforts.
Tushka, Oklahoma tornado, an EF3 which struck the town on April 14, 2011, during the Mid-April 2011 tornado outbreak. Shot by Gabe Garfield and Marc Austin of the National Weather Service.
Uncertainties
How do we improve our understanding of what is at risk and possible responses?
Crucial considerations for coastal and flood plain planning, water resource planning, infrastructure and building design, etc.
Pace of change
Regional implications
Will there be changed frequency of extreme events? Severe storms, floods
and droughts
Forces Occurring Together to Accelerate Stress
Not only adverse human or natural stress affecting ecosystems or areas in which we live.
Growing ocean acidification.
Depletion of fossil aquifers.
Land degradation.
Destruction of forests, especially in the tropical regions.
Systems are Interdependent
Protecting the Ogallala Aquifer for Future Use
Some Encouraging Trends
U.S. Greenhouse Gases
Total emissions levels have dropped almost to 1994 levels due largely to increased efficiency and greater use of renewables.
Should continue to be amplified by substitution in U.S. of natural gas for coal in the utility sector.
To maximize climate benefits of coal to gas switch, it is crucial to minimize methane leaks from natural gas system.
Energy Use & Emissions
U.S. Position: Opportunity
Leverage our good fortune as soon-to-be world’s leading energy producer; ensure continued prosperity and catalyze effective national response to climate change.
In natural gas sector: hold overall methane leakage from natural gas extraction, transmission and distribution to below 1%.
How can our energy planning and foreign policy promote results that will sustain our national economy, reduce risk of climate disruption, and meld into climate protection responses, benefits to human health and food production?
U.S. Opportunities
Wide political support here. April 22, 2009, joint sponsorship of successful legislation by Senators Inhofe, Carper, Boxer and Kerry to mandate U.S. EPA to develop options for black carbon reductions here and abroad.
Encourage special focus on emission reductions in regions such as Arctic, where we may be at near irreversible climate tipping points.
Reduce federal and state regulatory barriers to energy recycling (cogeneration).
Promote aggressive international attack on Short- Lived Climate Forcers that affect climate and human health and where benefits can be realized soon.
Global Emission Trends
Climate and Clean Air Coalition
Rapid growth of CCAC action on black carbon, methane, hydrofluorocarbons and tropospheric ozone that together produce as much an effect on climate change as CO2.
Reductions will often yield not only climate benefits but enhanced human health (BC), and sometimes economic (recovery for energy of leaking methane) or safety (harvesting of methane from coal mines).
Challenges Barrier to be overcome:
failure of Kyoto Protocol-based trading systems to incentivize these reductions.
Rethinking How We Compare GHGs
Common Metric:1 tonne of methane = 22 tonnes of CO2
Possible New Metric:1 tonne of methane = 75 tonnes of CO2
What’s the difference? (Hint: Methane only lasts 12 years)
Tropospheric Ozone
Formed as a secondary product of other emissions By oxidation of methane, CO, and VOCs in the presence
of NOx
Once formed, lasts 20 – 24 days
Warming Effect is ~ 0.3 W/m2
18% of CO2 effect
Methane
Atmospheric concentrations rising after several years of stability
Lasts 12 years in atmosphere
Warming Effect is ~ 0.86 W/m2
Just over 50% of CO2 effect
Win-Win opportunities to reduce methane
Black Carbon (Soot)
Dark-colored type of aerosol / particulate matter (PM) Absorbs sunlight and heat Stays in atmosphere for only 1 – 2 weeks
Atmospheric Warming Effect is 0.44 – 0.9 W/m2
28 – 55% of CO2 effect
Decreased snow albedo in Arctic and Himalayas Enormous regional increase in warming effect Globally averaged, is an additional 0.1 – 0.2 W/m2
Harmful to human respiratory health
Regional Effects
• “Tropospheric ozone and BC snow albedo effect contribute substantially to rapid warming and sea ice loss in the Arctic” - James Hansen et al. 2005
• Arctic Warming Since 1890 (Shindell et al. 2009)• Black carbon: 0.5 – 1.4˚C• Trop. Ozone: 0.2 – 0.4˚C
• Shindell estimates that combined sulfate decrease and BC increase caused 75% of direct Arctic warming over past 30 years
Benefits from Black Carbon Reduction
Atmospheric loading and warming influence will drop as emissions drop
Acute decrease in Arctic warming
Reducing certain BC emissions will result in: Reduced indoor air pollution, which kills 1.9M annually Reduced outdoor air pollution, which kills 0.8M annually
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
2055
2060
2065
2070
2075
2080
2085
2090
2095
2100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
YEAR
Rad
iati
ve F
orc
ing
(w
att
s p
er
sq m
ete
r)
20th Century GHG Emissions
21st Century CO2 only
Warming Effect During 21st CenturyAggressive Reductions in both GHGs and Black Carbon
Credit: MacCracken 2009
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
2030
2034
2038
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
YEAR
Ra
dia
tive
Fo
rcin
g (
wa
tts p
er
sq
me
ter)
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
2030
2034
2038
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
YEAR
Near-Term Changes in Warming EffectBlack Carbon is Critical to Reducing Near-Term Warming
Business as Usual
Aggressive Reductionsin BC and GHGs
Credit: MacCracken 2009
The Four Crucial Regions
Himalayas
Amazonian Rainforest & Andean
Mountains
The Four Crucial Regions
Antarctica The Arctic
Short-Lived Climate Forcers
Amazon Amazon land and
conversion forest loss may push to point of dieback. Andes may be affected both by warming and SLCF deposition. Could mean loss of water resources for tens of millions.
Himalayas/Tibetan Plateau Water resources for at least a
sixth of humanity could be imperiled.
Decisive global action targeting SLCFs the next best step to bide time for the regions in danger of irreversible damage. Increased efficiency, non or
low-carbon fuel sources. Antarctic
Parts warming rapidly with potential for adding to sea level rise from melting of glaciers in Greenland and other regions and warming of upper layers of ocean.
South America: Closely Interconnected
Ecosystems
Amazon Rainforest The Amazonian Rainforest is the
greatest treasure trove of biodiversity on the planet.
It is disappearing rapidly due to land conversion for cattle farms, mining and small farmers.
Brazilian Scientists (Simoes & Evangelista) report that emissions from burning for land clearing in the Amazon, especially for cattle farms, may be producing as much as half of black carbon deposition in the Antarctic.
Andes Mountains Glaciers in the mountains
provide water supplies for tens of millions in South America and hydropower for millions.
Rapid glacial melt imperils this water supply.
Efforts are underway to install cleaner cook stoves in many Andean communities and reduce black carbon emissions.
Antarctica
Glacial thinning:
Glaciers in Antarctica contain about 70% of all the fresh water on Earth; if all were to melt, global sea levels would rise over 60 meters — more than 200 feet.
Antarctica
There is a modest net loss now from Antarctica, about 150 cubic kilometers each year (Hansen, 2007) but if this accelerates it could add significantly to global sea level rise.
Deposition of significant quantities of black carbon from fires in South America and Africa has been detected in Antarctica and linked to agricultural burning. No linkage has yet been done on their role in ice loss.
Although Antarctica is the coldest region on Earth, some portions in the Antarctic Peninsula and West Antarctic are among the most rapidly warming parts of the planet.
Most Antarctic ice loss seems attributable to interaction with warming waters of the Southern Ocean more than to warming on the land.
The Himalayas
Himalayas – Tibetan Plateau
Emissions of black carbon, especially from diesel transport and cook stoves, appear as great a factor as overall global warming in spurring glacial melting.
Indian Supreme Court has mandated that in public transport compressed natural gas vehicles replace current diesel and other vehicles.
Provides water supplies for about one of every six humans on earth. Rapid glacial melt underway that may reduce water availability.
Project Surya seeks to reduce black carbon emissions, save lives and reduce climate forcing through replacement of cook stoves and kerosene lanterns with cleaner alternatives http://www.projectsurya.org/
S
The Arctic’s Role
And Functions of the Arctic Climate Action Registry
The Arctic Crisis
Scientists have confirmed that the Arctic is in crisis, and acts as a bellwether as a sensitive region.
At the current rate of warming, Arctic summers will be ice-free within five to ten years, for the first time in 65 million years.
There will be enormous disruption to local communities and wildlife. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg—a melting Arctic will have dire consequences for the entire planet.
Source: http://www.arcticclimateregistry.org/
Climate Change in the Arctic
In September 2012, a new record level of Ice melt was recorded. At this rate the Arctic could be ice-free in summer by the end of this decade.
Economist, August 28 2012
Climate Change in the Arctic
Melting of the Greenland ice sheet, contributing to global sea level rise
Scientists at NASA first thought satellite readings were a mistake after images showed 97% surface melt over four days
Significant erosion, threatening villages
Collapse of whole ecosystems
Melting of permafrost and release of trapped methane hydrates
Chief Causes
Global Warming CO2 and other Kyoto GHGs
Arctic Regional Contribution (50-70%) Methane Black Carbon Tropospheric Ozone
Methane Hydrate Pulse5,000 billion tons trapped ~
all CO2 and CH4 combined
Climate Change Impacts
Displacement of villages due to sea level rise and melting permafrost
Public infrastructure damage
Ecosystem impacts (e.g., new pests, migratory species)
Food security (e.g., fisheries, subsistence hunting, melting ice cellars)
Human health issues (e.g., disease, asthma)
ALASKA
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has reported:
Almost all of Alaska’s 200+ villages have been affected by flooding and erosion, with 4 requiring relocation
31 villages face imminent threats
12 of the 31 villages are exploring relocation options
Climate Change Impacts
Locations of Arctic Indigenous Peoples
Arctic Climate Action Registry (ACAR)
An effort to incentivize reductions of emissions of soot, methane and tropospheric ozone forming compounds.
No other organization in the world is taking action fast enough to save the Arctic. The Arctic Climate Action Registry will certify projects that immediately counteract the meltdown in the Arctic using metrics defined in the new Draft American (ANSI) Greenhouse Gas Accounting Standard.
The Arctic Climate Action Registry Network is a social network consisting of scientists, business leaders, government officials, educators, and consumers. Its goal is to help members communicate about taking action to save the Arctic.
If successful, could be adapted and extended to the Antarctic, Amazon-Andes and Himalayas.
ACAR Vision, Mission and Strategy
VISION: Slow down and ultimately end climate change in the Arctic region and, in so doing, slow down climate change around the globe.
MISSION: Mitigate greenhouse gases and other climate forcers affecting the Arctic region.
STRATEGY: Stimulate projects and activities in support of our mission, based on incentives and market mechanisms, with measurable progress within the decade.
ACAR Registry Project Opportunities
Examples
Shipping – Equipping ships with technology to capture black carbon, and using or purchasing turbine-powered ships.
Forest fires – Boreal forest crown fire suppression management under Forest Stewardship Council guidelines.
Airlines – Reduced emissions from airline fleets, e.g., some rerouting of flights, increased fuel efficiency.
Pollution Prevention –Stack emissions captured at electricity production and other industrial facilities.
Methane Capture – Methane capture for energy generation.
Natural Cycle Enhancement – Micronization of sea water to help cool the region, i.e., ships generating spray to promote cooling.
Significance for International Security
Aside from a scramble for energy resources, there are negative implications of enhanced Greenland melt for U.S. and other major world cities.
Potential unpredictable effects on weather patterns and world agriculture at loss of year round Arctic Sea Ice.
Summation & Action Plan
The focus on the Arctic is justified and mitigation should be viewed in a global context. e.g., Greenland melting
is a crucial threat to sea levels worldwide because of annual ice loss of 150 cubic km (Hansen).
The three other vulnerable regions: Antarctic, Himalayas- Tibetan Plateau and Amazon-Andes, may ultimately be targets of regional SLCF focused mitigation strategies. Why? 150 cubic km
annual ice loss is also true for Antarctica (Hansen).
Climate Change and the International Stage
Thank you!
Questions/Comments?
Acknowledgments: Principally Jillian Jordan, thanks also to Michael MacCracken, John - Michael Cross, Matt Vetter, Christopher Philipp and Linda Brown.
Climate.org & Arctic Climate Action Registry (ACAR)