NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL
Council Chambers
30 March 2017
I wish to inform you that a Meeting of the NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING
PANEL will be held in the Council Chambers, North Sydney at 2pm on Wednesday 5 April
2017 when your attendance is requested.
Your attention is directed to the accompanying statement of the business proposed to be
transacted at such meeting.
ROSS MCCREANOR
ACTING GENERAL MANAGER
BUSINESS
1. Minutes
Confirmation of Minutes of the previous Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March
2017.
(Circulated)
NSIPP COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEATING PLAN
PUBLIC GALLERY
Pane
l Mem
ber Panel M
ember
Panel Member Panel Member
Staf
f
Speaker/s
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 2
2. IPP01: 18 Bay View Street Lavender Bay (V), DA.409/16
Applicant: Roslyn and Geoff Morgan
Report of Geoff Mossemenear, Executive Planner, 17 March 2017
This development application seeks Council’s approval for demolition of the
existing building and the construction of a multi level dwelling. The application
is referred to NSIPP due to the public interest.
Council’s notification of the proposal has attracted 12 submissions raising
particular concerns about construction impacts, traffic, overshadowing, privacy,
loss of views, green roof, overdevelopment and landscape impacts.
Height poles were erected to allow an accurate view assessment from the three
properties at the rear of the subject site. The architect, applicant’s planner and
Council Officer visited each of the affected sites to take photos of the height
poles. At Council’s request, the applicant amended their proposal to lessen the
impact on the views. As the amended proposal had no greater impact,
notification was not required.
The assessment has considered the concerns raised as well as the performance
of the application against Council’s planning requirements.
Following this assessment the development application is considered to be
reasonable in the circumstances and is recommended for approval.
Recommending: PURSUANT TO SECTION 80 OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND
ASSESSMENT ACT 1979 (AS AMENDED)
THAT the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel, as the consent authority,
grant consent to Development Application No.409/16 subject to the attached
conditions.
3. IPP02: 83 Union Street, McMahons Point (V) - DA 434 /16
Applicant: Sarah & Ross Smith
Report of Aloma Moriarty, Assessment Officer, 23 March 2017
This development application seeks Council’s approval for alterations and
additions to an existing terrace dwelling.
The subject property is a contributory item located within the Union, Bank,
Thomas conservation area. The dwelling is a two storey terrace, with an attic
and a two storey rear wing.
The application is reported to North Sydney Independent Planning Panel for
determination because the variation sought to the building height development
standard is greater than 10% requiring determination by the NSIPP in
accordance with the directions from the NSW Department of Planning.
The existing dwelling and proposed works include a maximum height of 9.8m
(existing) and 9.5m (proposed) above the existing ground levels. This
contravenes Clause 4.3(2B) of the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan
2013, which specifies a maximum building height of 5.5m for sites with areas
less than 230m2. The height non-compliance of up to 4m (72.7%) is attributable
to the new first floor and attic extension.
The applicant has submitted a Clause 4.6 request for variation to address the
breach to the building height standard. The proposal satisfies the objectives of
the standard and is considered to maintain the amenity and character of the
neighbourhood subject to the imposition of conditions. The breaches in building
height will not cause material loss of views or overshadowing to surrounding
properties and the impacts to the privacy of the adjoining properties can be
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 3
mitigated through the imposition of conditions. The objectives of the height
control would therefore be achieved despite the variation. The variation to the
building height is supported in this instance.
Council’s notification of the proposal has attracted two submissions raising
issues relating to privacy from the ground floor windows on the eastern
elevation, first floor rear deck and attic level balcony. Following assessment of
the proposal it was considered that the ground floor windows would not impact
on the privacy of the adjoining dwelling, however the first floor deck and the
attic level balcony would have adverse material impacts on the visual privacy
of the adjoining properties. As a result, conditions are recommended to require
the reduction of the first floor deck and deletion of the attic level balcony.
The assessment has considered these concerns as well as the performance of the
application against Council’s planning requirements and appropriate conditions
of consent have been recommended.
Following this assessment the development application is considered to be
reasonable in the circumstances and is recommended for approval subject to
conditions.
Recommending: PURSUANT TO SECTION 80 OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND
ASSESSMENT ACT 1979 (AS AMENDED)
THAT the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel, under the delegation of
the General Manager as the consent authority, assume the concurrence of the
Director General of the Department of Planning and invoke the provisions of
Clause 4.6 of North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013, with regard to the
exception to the development standard for height, and grant consent to
Development Application No. 434/16 for alterations and additions to a two
storey plus attic terrace dwelling, subject to the attached standard conditions and
following site specific conditions:-
Reduction of Depth of Proposed First Floor Deck
A4. The proposed first floor deck must be reduced in depth by a total of 1.7m,
reducing the depth of the proposed deck from 2.98m to 1.28m, to align with the
deck of the adjoining dwelling at 85 Union Street.
Plans and specifications complying with this condition must be submitted to the
Certifying Authority for approval prior to the issue of any Construction
Certificate.
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted, referenced on and accompanying the unissued Construction
Certificate fully satisfy the requirements of this condition.
(Reason: To ensure that the proposed development is characteristic within the
area)
Deletion of Proposed Attic Level Balcony and Replacement with Juliet
Balcony A5. The proposed balcony to the attic floor must be deleted and replaced with a
juliet style balcony with a maximum projection of 100mm from the external
façade of the dormer. The Juliet balcony must be located centrally and
symmetrically to the dormer. No approval is given for the dormer to be offset
to the side.
Plans and specifications complying with this condition must be submitted to the
Certifying Authority for approval prior to the issue of any Construction
Certificate.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 4
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted, referenced on and accompanying the unissued Construction
Certificate fully satisfy the requirements of this condition.
(Reason: To reduce the heritage impact of the attic level addition and to ensure
that the proposed development is characteristic within the area)
Weatherboards
A6. The external cladding of the dormer is to be natural timber weatherboards
or Scyon Linear cladding in traditional profile and paint finish, laid in a
horizontal pattern. No approval is given for any other type of weatherboard.
Plans and specifications complying with this condition must be submitted to the
Certifying Authority for approval prior to the issue of any construction
Certificate.
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted, referenced on and accompanying the issues Construction Certificate
fully satisfy the requirements of this condition.
(Reason: To ensure the use of materials and finishes complementary to the
Conservation Area.)
Metal privacy screens
A7. The privacy screens are to have a powdercoat finish in a neutral colour to
match the adjacent walls. No approval is given for a metallic finish to the
privacy screens.
Plans and specifications complying with this condition must be submitted to the
Certifying Authority for approval prior to the issue of any construction
Certificate.
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted, referenced on and accompanying the issues Construction Certificate
fully satisfy the requirements of this condition.
(Reason: To ensure the use of materials and finishes complementary to the
Conservation Area)
Screen Planting
C16.The screen planting proposed within the breezeway along the eastern
boundary is to have a maximum height of 1.8m at planting.
Plans and specifications complying with this condition must be submitted to the
Certifying Authority for approval prior to the issue of any construction
Certificate.
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted, referenced on and accompanying the issues Construction Certificate
fully satisfy the requirements of this condition.
(Reason: To ensure an adequate level of privacy is provided to the adjoining
properties)
Works to be wholly within subject property/ No works to party wall
C17.The proposed works approved as part of this development consent must be
located wholly within the subject site. No approval is given or implied to any
works to the existing party wall.
Should any works to the party wall be required, owners consent from the
adjoining owner at No. 85 Union Street must be obtained.
(Reason: To ensure the proposed works will not impact on the existing party
wall)
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 5
4. IPP03: 44 West Street, North Sydney (V) - DA 389/16
Applicant: Latrade (Australia) Pty Ltd
Report of Susanna Cheng, Senior Assessment Officer, 21 March 2017
This development application seeks Council’s approval for use of building as a
hotel (16 guest rooms) and heritage maintenance.
The application is reported to NSIPP for determination as the proposed use for
hotel accommodation is not permissible within R2 Low Density Residential
zone and the application relies on the conservation incentives for heritage items
provided for in North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013 in order to
overcome the prohibition.
The submitted Heritage Management Document includes a Schedule of
Conservation Works containing details of cyclical maintenance works and
staged conservation actions to be undertaken. Council’s Conservation Planner
has assessed the heritage works and is satisfied that the development will have
a positive impact on the building’s fabric. The proposed use as hotel will
generate an income stream that will allow for the completion of conservation
works and ongoing maintenance of the building, sufficient to ensure the ongoing
heritage significance of the site, beyond that which could be otherwise achieved
by a conforming residential scheme or a confirmation of the boarding house use.
Council’s notification of the proposal has attracted one submission raising
particular concerns about affordable housing, occupancy, traffic and parking.
The assessment has considered these concerns as well as the performance of the
application against Council’s planning requirements.
The existing building has operated as a transitional group home since the 1940s.
It has operated as such till 2015 despite more recent development approval for
boarding house use. The group home for young persons was not open to the
general public and is distinguished from boarding house or other form of
affordable rental housing to which the SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009
applies. The previous residents have been relocated by the service provider.
The proposed configuration and capacity of the hotel are considered to be
suitable having regard to the existing built form and the location of the site at a
zone interface adjoining high density residential and mixed use commercial uses
within a densely built highly urbanised context.
The site is centrally located close to North Sydney Centre and public transport
services and is not anticipated to give rise to any material traffic impacts or
significantly affect on-street parking demand. Delivery and service vehicles can
be adequately accommodated within the site.
The operation of the hotel will be subject to a Plan of Management and
conditions of consent including in relation to occupancy, use of outdoor areas,
and air conditioners, so as to maintain reasonable residential amenity. The
proposal has been compared against conforming uses within the site, including
boarding house, child care centre and place of public worship, and it is
considered that the proposed development would not result in heritage and
amenity impacts that would be significantly greater than these other conforming
uses.
Following this assessment it is considered that the development will achieve
desirable heritage outcomes and is reasonable in the circumstances. The
application is recommended for approval subject to conditions.
Recommending: PURSUANT TO SECTION 80 OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND
ASSESSMENT ACT 1979 (AS AMENDED)
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 6
THAT the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel, under the delegation of
the General Manager as the consent authority, grant consent to Development
Application No. 389/16 for use of building as a hotel (16 guest rooms) and
heritage maintenance, on land described as 44 West Street, North Sydney,
subject to the attached standard conditions and following site specific
conditions:
Use as hotel accommodation
A4. Approval is granted under this consent for the purpose of hotel
accommodation as defined in North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013.
No approval is granted or implied for use of the site for the purpose of
backpackers’ accommodation as defined in the Instrument.
(Reason: To clarify consent)
Schedule of Conservation Works
A5. The Schedule of Conservation Works in Heritage Management Document
dated 7/12/16 prepared by Urbis and received by Council on 21/12/16 shall be
amended to reflect the following changes:
3.4.3Replace gutters to front verandah – to be included in Conservation Action
Priority 1
3.5.9Floors in ground floor Main Areas – levelling works and replacement of
floating floor to be included in Conservation Action 1
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted by the Applicant, referenced and accompanying the issued
Construction Certificate, fully satisfy the above.
(Reason: To ensure the reinstatement of original details)
Implementation of development consent DA62/16
A6. All works approved under development consent DA 62/16 dated 7/10/16
are to be undertaken prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate for this
consent.
(Reason: To ensure completion of conservation works and reinstatement of
original and significant garden setting)
Security bond for conservation works
A7. Prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, security deposit or bank
guarantee must be provided to Council to the sum of $200,000.00 to be held by
Council for the payment of cost for any/all of the works contained in the
Schedule of Conservation Works in Heritage Management Document dated
7/12/16 prepared by Urbis and received by Council on 21/12/16.
Written certification from a qualified heritage consultant which confirms that
all works have been conducted must be obtained in and provided to Council
prior to the release of any bond or bank guarantee.
The security required by this condition must be provided by way of a deposit
with the Council; or other such guarantee that is satisfactory to Council (such
as a bank guarantee). Any guarantee provided as security must name North
Sydney Council as the nominated beneficiary and must not be subject to an
expiry date.
The security will be refundable following the completion of all of the
components of scheduled conservation works to the satisfaction of a heritage
architect and provision of satisfactory documentation detailing the completion
of all works in a manner consistent with the Schedule of Maintenance Works.
(Reason: To ensure delivery of heritage outcomes)
Signage
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 7
A8. No approval is given for any new external or internal signage. Separate
application(s) for signage are required as follows:
All internal signage is to be the subject of a further development application;
and
All external signage (with the exception of exempt or complying development)
is to be the subject of a further development application.
(Reason: To reduce the heritage impact of the works and ensure retention of
significant fabric)
Location of air conditioning condenser units
A9. The provision of air conditioning condenser units is restricted as follows:
No approval is given for the installation of any additional air-conditioning or
mechanical ventilation, or additional ductwork not indicated on the approved
drawings;
No approval is given for the location of any air conditioning condenser units to
the front (east) elevation of the building, or any additional air conditioning
condenser units on the northern side of the building other than the enclosed air
conditioning unit as detailed in the approved drawings; and
No approval is given for the location of any air conditioning condenser units at
first floor level or roof of any building, other than the single unit on the roof of
the covered patio at the rear as detailed in the approved drawings.
(Reason: To reduce heritage impact; minimise impact on surrounding
properties)
Exterior lighting
A10. No approval is given for any new exterior lighting. Any new external
lighting should be the subject of a further development application.
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted by the Applicant, referenced and accompanying the issued
Construction Certificate, fully satisfy the above.
(Reason: To ensure no additional heritage impact)
Internal doors
C21. The flush panel internal door to the kitchen shall be replaced with a sold
timber panelled door, to match the original timber internal doors.
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted by the Applicant, referenced and accompanying the issued
Construction Certificate, fully satisfy the above.
(Reason: To ensure the reinstatement of original details)
Screen planting to gas meters
G8. The gas meters are to be screened by appropriate shrubs, planted with a
height that ensures that the meters are fully screened.
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted by the Applicant, referenced and accompanying the issued
Occupation Certificate, fully satisfy the above.
(Reason: To reduce heritage impact)
Timer restrictions on air conditioners
I11. All air conditioning unit/system(s) installed on the premises shall be fitted
with tamper-resistant automatic timers or other suitable device that cannot be
overridden other than by authorised staff, so as to ensure the air conditioners do
not operate during the following hours:
before 8.00am and after 10.00pm on any Saturday, Sunday or Public Holiday;
and
before 7.00am or after 10.00pm on any other day.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 8
Operable windows must be provided in all habitable rooms to provide natural
ventilation during these restricted hours.
(Reason: To maintain residential amenity)
No sale of alcohol
I12. The sale of alcohol is not permitted on site. The Plan of Management shall
be updated to reflect this requirement.
(Reason: To clarify consent)
Smoking
I13. No smoking is permitted within any building or outdoor area(s) of the site.
The Plan of Management shall be updated to reflect this requirement
(Reason: To manage smoke drift and nuisance)
5. IPP04: 66 Colin Street, Cammeray (T) - DA 430/16
Applicant: Sharon Addington and Paul Johnson, c/o Contemporary
Architecture
Report of Luke Donovan, Senior Assessment Officer, 29 March 2017
The applicant seeks development consent from NSIPP for alterations and
additions to the existing dwelling including a rear two storey addition and a
swimming pool in the rear setback at No. 66 Colin Street, Cammeray. The
property is identified as a Neutral Item within the Plateau Conservation Area.
The application is referred to the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel for
determination at the request of Councillors Beregi and Marchandeau.
Council’s notification of the original proposal has attracted three (3)
submissions against the application. Council’s notification of the amended
application attracted three (3) submissions against the application and five (5)
submission in support of the application. The submissions raised particular
concerns about excessive bulk and scale, overshadowing, loss of outlook and
visual privacy, uncharacteristic built form and non-compliant side setbacks.
The proposed two storey rear addition will be visible from the lower part of
Colin Street altering the scale of the dwelling from one storey cottage to a two
storey dwelling that is likely to have a negative impact upon this part of the
Plateau Conservation Area which is characterised by single storey dwellings.
The siting of the rear addition and swimming pool would also result in the loss
of visual and acoustic privacy for adjoining properties.
Having regard to the provisions of Section 79C of the Environmental Planning
& Assessment
Act 1979, the application is considered to be unreasonable in the site
circumstances and recommended for refusal due to the detrimental impacts on
the Plateau Conservation Area, the excessive bulk and scale of the rear addition
and the adverse amenity impacts for adjoining properties.
Recommending: PURSUANT TO SECTION 80 OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND
ASSESSMENT ACT 1979 (AS AMENDED)
THAT the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel, under the delegation of
the A/General Manager as the consent authority, resolve to refuse development
consent to Development Application No. 430/16 for alterations and additions
to the existing dwelling including a rear two storey addition and swimming pool
in the rear setback at No. 66 Colin Street, Cammeray, as shown on plans DA01
– DA16 Revision B drawn by Contemporary Architecture Pty Ltd dated
9/03/2017, for the following reasons:-
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 9
Detrimental impacts on the Plateau Conservation Area
The rear two storey addition will be visible from the lower part of Colin Street
and alter the scale of the dwelling from one to two storeys which will negatively
impact upon this part of the Plateau Conservation Area which is characterised
by single storey dwellings.
Particulars
The proposal is contrary to Aims of Plan 1.2(2)(f) in NSLEP 2013.
The proposal is contrary to objective (dot point 3) in the R2 Low Density
Residential Zone.
The proposal is contrary to objective (b) in Clause 5.10 in NSLEP 2013.
The proposal is contrary to Objective O1 in Part B, Section 1.4.8 in NSDCP
2013.
The proposal is contrary to Objective O1 in Part B, Section 13.6.1 and Objective
O1 in Part B, Section 13.6.2 in NSDCP 2013.
Excessive bulk and scale of the rear addition
The rear two storey addition will result in a dwelling that is significantly larger
than other characteristic dwelling within this part of the Plateau Conservation
Area.
Particulars
The bulk and scale of the rear addition is not considered to be appropriate having
regard to the immediate built form character therefore contrary to Aims of Plan
1.2(2)(a) and 1.2(2)(b)(i) in NSLEP 2013.
The proposed rear addition is excessive in scale and not located within a single
storey roof line contrary to Provision P4 in Part C, Section 4.5.6 in NSDCP
2013.
A 35-degree gable roof form over the rear two storey addition in lieu of a
skillion roof exacerbates the visibility of the addition from the lower part of
Colin Street contrary to Provision P6 in Part C, Section 4.5.6 in NSDCP 2013.
The rear addition is considered to be ‘over scaled’ which is identified as an
uncharacteristic element within the Plateau Conservation Area. The proposal is
therefore contrary to Provision P1 in Part C, Section 4.5.7 in NSDCP 2013.
The north western part of the rear addition is located a maximum of 860mm
above existing ground level and therefore fails to respect the natural topography
of the site contrary to O1 in Part B, Section 1.3.1 in NSDCP 2013.
The minimal articulation along the northern elevation of the rear addition would
contribute to the excessive visual mass of the development particularly when
viewed from the single storey dwelling at No. 68 Colin Street which is
significantly lower than the subject site.
The raising of the ridge height by 365mm over the front part of the dwelling
further adds to the scale of the dwelling when viewed from Colin Street.
The proposal is contrary to Objective O1 in Part B, Section 1.4.7 in NSDCP
2013.
Adverse amenity impacts for adjoining properties
The design and siting of the rear addition and swimming pool will result in
adverse privacy impacts for adjoining properties.
Particulars
The western living room window (D03) will result in adverse visual privacy
impacts on the rear garden of No. 68 Colin Street and living spaces at No. 64
Colin Street.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 10
The deck and BBQ area located on the south western side of the rear addition
will result in adverse acoustic impacts on the living spaces at No. 64 Colin
Street.
The proposal will result in an unreasonable level of overshadowing to the living
spaces and private courtyard of the dwelling on the adjoining property at No. 64
Colin Street.
The paving around the swimming pool is elevated above existing ground level
and is likely to result in adverse privacy impacts for the adjoining properties at
No. 68 Colin Street and No. 26 Pine Street.
The proposal is not considered to be in the public interest contrary to Section
79C(e)of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (as amended).
6. IPP05: Primrose Park Art and Craft Centre, Matora Lane, Cremorne (T)
- DA 456/16
Applicant: Figgis and Jefferson Tepa Pty Ltd
Report of Geoff Goodyer, Town Planning Consultant, Symons Goodyer Pty
Ltd, 23 March 2017
This development application seeks NIPP approval for alterations and additions
to the existing Primrose Park Art and Craft Centre. The works involve
demolition of the existing mezzanine level and construction of a new mezzanine
level at the southern end of the building. Access will be provided to this level
on the southern elevation by the footpath connecting the existing car park and
the existing overpass. The door on the eastern elevation is also proposed to be
removed. Other works include modifying the external concrete path and
northern entry doors to improve accessibilities. It is also intended to provide an
accessible w.c., unisex w.c. and a kitchenette. A lift is proposed to provide
access to the mezzanine level.
The application is reported to NSIPP for determination because North Sydney
Council is the owner of the land and the construction works are greater than
$250,000.
The application has been assessed under the NSLEP 2013, NSDCP 2013 and
other relevant planning instruments and policies and generally found to be
satisfactory because the works are unlikely to have any impact upon the heritage
significance of the building and/or Primrose Park. Surrounding residential
properties are far enough away from the Art and Craft Centre that there will be
no impact upon residential amenity.
Council’s notification of the proposal has attracted two (2) neighbour
submissions raising particular concerns about inconsistencies in the Statement
of Heritage Impact regarding the location of the proposed works and the
structural adequacy of new addition. The assessment has considered these
concerns as well as the performance of the application against Council’s
planning requirements.
Following this assessment the development application is considered to be
reasonable in the circumstances and is recommended for approval subject to
conditions.
Recommending: PURSUANT TO SECTION 80 OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND
ASSESSMENT ACT 1979 (AS AMENDED)
THAT the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel, under the delegation
from the Acting General Manager, grant consent to Development Application
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 11
No. 456/16 for alterations and additions to the Primrose Park Art and Craft
Centre, Matora Lane, Cremorne subject to the attached conditions.
7. IPP06: 1 Rowlison Parade, Cammeray (TU) – DA 329/16
Applicant: James Tray
Report of Judith Elijah, Student Town Planner, 21 March 2017
This development application seeks development consent for alterations and
additions to an existing dual occupancy involving the construction of an
additional upper floor level to dwelling 2 and an internal lift on land at No. 1
Rowlison Parade, Cremorne.
The application is referred to NSIPP for determination because the variation
sought to the building height development standard is greater than 10% also due
to the public interest in the application.
Council’s notification of the original proposal attracted a total of two (2)
submissions against the application raising concerns about a loss of visual
privacy, the bulk and scale of the development and inconsistencies between the
plans. The applicant submitted amended plans on 3 February 2017 with a
reduced scope of works, so the amended plans were renotified to the immediate
adjoining properties. The amended proposal received two (2) submissions
raising similar issues regarding view loss, loss of visual and acoustic privacy
and an increase in visual bulk.
The applicant has submitted a Clause 4.6 objection to vary the building height
control which is considered to be reasonable and supportable given that the non-
compliances are limited to a small proportion of the new upper floor level and
the lift overrun. The non-compliance would not have a detrimental impact upon
the streetscape presentation or adversely affect visual privacy, views or solar
access for the surrounding properties.
The amended proposal would cause a minor non-compliance with Council’s site
coverage control and would result in a further reduction in the landscaped area
on site. However, the increase in site coverage is due to the proposed upper
floor level being cantilevered over the existing unbuilt upon and landscaped
areas below, so there would no physical alteration to the land so this non-
compliance is considered to be acceptable.
Furthermore, any additional overshadowing caused by the proposed
development would arise from complying elements of the building having
regard to setbacks and building height. The proposal maintains visual privacy
for adjoining properties and the surrounds, subject to recommended conditions.
Having regard to the provisions of Section 79C of the Environmental Planning
& Assessment Act 1979, the application is considered to be satisfactory and
recommended for approval subject to the attached standard and site specific
conditions.
Recommending: PURSUANT TO SECTION 80 OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND
ASSESSMENT ACT 1979 (AS AMENDED)
THAT the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel, as the consent authority
under delegation from the Acting General Manager, assume the concurrence of
the Director General of the Department of Planning and invoke the provisions
of Clause 4.6 with regard to the exception to the development standard for
building height, and grant consent to Development Application DA329/16 for
alterations and additions to an existing dual occupancy including the
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL -05/04/17 Page No 12
construction of a new upper floor level and lift at No. 1 Rowlison Parade,
Cammeray, subject to the attached standard conditions and the following site
specific condition:-
C14.Privacy
The following amendments are to be made to the openings on the southern
elevation as marked in red on the approved plans to maintain visual privacy to
the south:
W10 must be reduced to one door only with frosted glazing.
W11 must be modified to a highlight window with a finished floor level to sill
height of 1.6m.
The Certifying Authority issuing the Construction Certificate must ensure that
the approved drainage plan and specifications, satisfying the requirements of
this condition, is referenced on and accompanies the Construction Certificate.
(Reason: To maintain residential amenity for surrounding properties)
This is Page No 1 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL
DETERMINATIONS OF THE NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING
PANEL MEETING HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, NORTH SYDNEY, ON
1 MARCH 2017, AT 2.25 PM.
PRESENT
Chair:
Jan Murrell in the Chair.
Panel Members:
Francesca O’Brien - Panel member
Ian Pickles - Panel member
Peter Brennan - Panel member
Staff:
Stephen Beattie - Manager Development Services
Geoff Mossemenear - Executive Assessment Planner
David Hoy - Team Leader Assessments
Robyn Pearson - Team Leader Assessments
Peita Rose - Governance Officer (Minutes)
Apologies: Nil.
1. Minutes of Previous Meeting
The Minutes of the NSIPP Meeting of 1 February 2017 were confirmed following that meeting.
2. Declarations of Interest: Nil
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 2
This is Page No 2 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
3. Business Items
The North Sydney Independent Planning Panel under the Delegated Authority granted by
North Sydney Council and s.377 of the Local Government Act 1993 has considered the
following Business Items and resolves to determine each matter as described within these
minutes.
ITEM 1
DA No: 397/16
ADDRESS: 14 Ridge Street, North Sydney
PROPOSAL: Alterations and additions to a two storey terrace dwelling and
change of use from commercial premises to a shop top housing
with business premises on the ground floor and a two-bedroom
dwelling on the first floor.
REPORT BY NAME: Aloma Moriarty, Assessment Officer
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Variation in Non- Residential FSR Control ( > 10%) & in
response to 2 submissions
APPLICANT: Smith & Tzannes Architects - Dane Everett
Public submissions
No persons elected to speak on this item.
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel.
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 2
DA No: 352/16
ADDRESS: 10 Hampden Street, North Sydney
PROPOSAL: Alterations and additions to a two storey terrace dwelling
REPORT BY NAME: Aloma Moriarty, Assessment Officer
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Variation in Building Height Control ( > 10%) & in response
to 1 submission
APPLICANT: Victoria Doherty & Neil Burton
C/- Vienna Design P/L
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 3
This is Page No 3 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
Public submissions
No persons elected to speak on this item.
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel.
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 3
DA No: 239/16/2
ADDRESS: 100 Miller Street, North Sydney
PROPOSAL: To modify consent for cladding of all elevations of Northpoint
Tower with regard to construction hours
REPORT BY NAME: Geoff Mossemenear, Executive Planner
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Public Interest
APPLICANT: Cromwell Seven Hills Pty Ltd, AFT Cromwell Northpoint Trust
David Brain
Public submissions
Michael Rowe - JBA Urban - planner
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel.
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 4
This is Page No 4 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
ITEM 4
DA No: 208/16
ADDRESS: 99 Bay Road, Waverton
PROPOSAL: Alterations and additions to dwelling including first floor
rear addition and deck
REPORT BY NAME: Susanna Cheng, Senior Assessment Officer
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Level of interest from the public
APPLICANT: Prudence Paver
c/- Contemporary Architecture - Clare Carter
Public submissions
Clare Carter - applicant
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel subject to Conditions C21
and C25 being amended as follows:
Delete Condition C21.
Amend Condition C25 to state “to delete reference to tessellated tiles”.
(Panel Reason: The Panel notes that the existing Tessellated tiles are in a poor condition and
have been compromised by the addition of the bay window and cannot be retained)
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 5
DA No: 253/02/6
ADDRESS: 2A Larkin Street, Waverton
PROPOSAL: To modify a consent DA253/02 for modification of condition
C27 to allow for height of plantings to 2m in lieu of 1m
REPORT BY NAME: Susanna Cheng, Senior Assessment Officer
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Degree and nature of public interest
APPLICANT: Sid French
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 5
This is Page No 5 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
Public submissions
Sid French - applicant
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel subject to the height of the
hedge to be maintained at 1.75m.
(Panel Reason: The Panel is satisfied that the existing height of the hedge does not create
unreasonable view loss for the adjoining neighbour)
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 6
DA No: 308/15
ADDRESS: 132 Burlington Street, Crows Nest
PROPOSAL: Alterations and additions to dwelling
REPORT BY NAME: Susanna Cheng, Senior Assessment Officer
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Councillor interest (MaryAnn Beregi)
APPLICANT: Hugh Porter
c/- Contemporary Architecture - Clare Carter
Public submissions
Clare Carter - applicant
John Oultram - consultant
Hugh Porter - owner
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel subject to deletion of
Condition C23 requiring the additional setback of the first floor addition from the western
boundary.
Condition D1 be amended to provide for a lesser standard of photographic recording, suitable
for the heritage significance of the dwelling as a contributory item. The Panel is satisfied that
photographic recording is warranted but considers archival standard is excessive.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 6
This is Page No 6 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
Delete Conditions C27 and C28. The Panel notes the materials & colours of the front of the
dwelling would comply with the intent of Condition C28 to retain light colours consistent with
the heritage significance of the dwelling. The Panel also considered the colour & material
selection for the additions were acceptable.
(Panel Reason: The Panel considers that the rear extension will not be readily visible from the
public domain and will read as an addition)
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 7
DA No: 138/16/2
ADDRESS: 53-57 Atchison Street & 96 Albany Lane, Crows Nest
PROPOSAL: To modify a consent DA138/16 for demolition of existing
structures, amalgamation of lots and construction of a 5-storey
residential flat building containing 18 units and basement car
park, to amend lift dimensions and height, increase northern
balconies by 300mm and delete condition A7 in relation to the
configuration of level 4 apartment 402
REPORT BY NAME: Susanna Cheng, Senior Assessment Officer
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Proposal includes modification of a consent condition imposed
by the Panel, being condition A7 requiring a 6m rear setback
on Level 4 of the building
APPLICANT: Avance Urban Pty Limited
c/- Andrew King
Public submissions
Michael Watson - planner
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel.
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 7
This is Page No 7 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
ITEM 8
DA No: 323/16
ADDRESS: 44 Cowdroy Avenue, Cammeray
PROPOSAL: Alterations and additions to an existing detached dwelling
including internal alterations, modifications to balconies, an
addition to Level 4 to provide a home office, a storage room, a
new lift and a replacement swimming pool.
REPORT BY NAME: Robin Tse, Senior Assessment Officer
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Variation sought to the building height development standard
is greater than 10%, which requires determination of the
application by the Panel.
APPLICANT: Tony Wilkinson
Public submissions
Tony Wilkinson - applicant
Duncan Zanby - architect
Veronica White - submitter
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is partly endorsed by the Panel subject to the
imposition of a deferred commencement condition requiring an amendment to the plan to delete
the proposed Level 4 elements which result in additional exceedance of the height controls,
(the home office/workshop). The lift and access thereto is to be retained. The level 1 Terrace
shall be reduced to a maximum depth of 3.2m and additional soft landscaping as offered by the
applicant shall be provided.
(Panel Reason: The Panel considers the additional exceedance of the height control to such a
large extent is not justified for the workshop and home office and the clause 4.6 objection fails
in respect of this portion of the building and a more skillfull design requires the deletion of
these elements)
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 8
This is Page No 8 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
ITEM 9
DA No: 336/16
ADDRESS: 315 Ernest Street, Neutral Bay
PROPOSAL: Demolition of the existing structures and the construction of a
three storey residential flat building with basement parking
REPORT BY NAME: Luke Donovan
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Public Interest
APPLICANT: Philip Kanjian
Public submissions
Patricia Hughes - submitter
Barry Badrkian - architect
Nigel White - planner
Andrew Aitchison - speaking on behalf of Michael Ball - Planning Collaborative
Bernard Gomm - Bernard Gomm & Associates, Architects
Business Item Recommendations
That the Panel defer the matter to provide an opportunity for the applicant to submit amended
plans to address the following:
Design Modifications to the building
The building shall be modified as follows:
a) The building is to be relocated 1m towards the southern (rear) boundary and
lowered by a minimum of 200mm.
b) The length of the basement level of the building must be reduced by a minimum of
3.5metres. This will necessitate the removal of at least one (1) of the parking spaces
within the basement level.
c) The additional unexcavated area at the rear of the site, as result of satisfying (a) &
(b) above, must be landscaped with appropriate grasses, shrubs and shown on an
amended landscape plan.
d) The size of the awning over the pedestrian entry, along the eastern side of the
building, must be reduced in size to a maximum of 2.4m (w) x 1.2m (d).
e) The upper level masonry wall extensions (parapets) shall be reduced by 900mm.
f) The rear setback at ground and first floor level is to be a minimum of 5m.
g) The privacy impacts to the heritage item at No. 317 from the entrance and its
pathways is to be addressed in the amended design.
Amended architectural and landscape plans satisfying the above are to be submitted to Council
within 30 days.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 9
This is Page No 9 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
(Panel Reason: The above amendments are considered necessary to allow the building to sit
lower within the site and result in less impacts to the adjoining property and streetscape. The
design modifications seek to achieve a better built form resolution)
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 10
DA No: 387/16
ADDRESS: 53 Reynolds Street, Cremorne
PROPOSAL: Demolition of the existing structures and the construction of
multi dwelling housing comprising 6 dwellings within two
buildings
REPORT BY NAME: Luke Donovan
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Public Interest
APPLICANT: HJ Two Pty Ltd c/o Corben Architects - Andrew Vingilis
Public submissions
Lisbeth Star - submitter
Chris Holding - submitter
Meredith Trevallyn-Jones - submitter
Andrew Vingilis - architect
Kerry Gordon – Planner on behalf of the applicant
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel.
In doing this, the panel notes that it has considered the various requests by submitters to defer
the application and has come to the conclusion that this is unnecessary as the Panel is well
informed by the Officers Report, its own view of the site and the verbal submissions made on
site and in the Panel meeting by the interested parties.
The Panels notes the conditions for excavation requires the geotechnical engineer to specify
the zone of influence and the method of excavation.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 10
This is Page No 10 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
The Panel also notes that there is a condition requiring the development to comply with the
NCC with regards to the access to and from the nominated adaptable unit and the remainder of
the development.
The Panel also notes that the proposed landscaping on the subject site adjacent to the boundary
to No. 57 at the rear will mitigate concerns about privacy and overlooking without relying on
the Leyton Green hedge. With respect to the privacy to the western window of the multi-use
room at No. 57 the Panel notes that the existing boundary fence is to be retained and the height
of the development on the subject site will not create overlooking.
The Panel noted Condition E8 would satisfy the concerns about boundary encroachments and
compliance with the approved building height.
The Panel was satisfied that Condition C27 adequately addresses the requirements for privacy
devices and similarly Condition C16 requires appropriate stormwater management.
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 11
DA No: 314/16
ADDRESS: 19 Samora Avenue, Cremorne
PROPOSAL: Demolition of an existing dual occupancy and the construction
of a new two (2) storey attached dual occupancy with off-street
parking and landscaping.
REPORT BY NAME: Robin Tse, Senior Town Planner
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
The subject application is reported to North Sydney
Independent Planning Panel due to the level of public interest.
APPLICANT: Hebden Architects - Andrew Hebden
Public submissions
Andrew Hebden - applicant
Bob Sanderson - submitter
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel subject to the modification
of Condition C1 to require the planter to be increased in width to 750mm and the horizontal
privacy ledge to be increased to 500mm.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 11
This is Page No 11 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
(Panel Reason: The above addition will increase privacy for the adjoining property at dwelling
1/17. In respect to 2/17, the Panel considers the conditions for fixed louvres and return privacy
screen and the retention of the existing screen planting adequately mitigates privacy impacts)
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 12
DA No: 84/16
ADDRESS: 1 Florence Lane, Cremorne
PROPOSAL: Demolition of a heritage item and construction of a two storey
dwelling
REPORT BY NAME: Robyn Pearson, Team Leader (Assessments)
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
This development application is reported to NSIPP having
regard to public and Councillor interest.
APPLICANT: Belinda Law, C/- Contemporary Architecture - Clare Carter
Public submissions
Frances O’Rourke - submitter
Clare Carter - applicant
Robert Stass - heritage consultant
Business Item Recommendations
The Panel resolves to defer the matter and request for the following to be carried out:
An Independent Heritage Consultant be appointed to assess the heritage significance
and the proposal to demolish the heritage item having regard to the heritage provisions
under Section 13 of the DCP 2013 and the documentary evidence submitted with the
application. A minimum of 3 consultants shall be nominated by Council and one agreed
to and paid for by the applicant.
That the applicant/owner demonstrate what approaches have been made to the adjoining
strata building to seek consent for the removal of the large Eucalyptus tree to the east
near the boundary and be reminded of their rights to explore this issue in accordance
with the TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) ACT 2006.
The applicant provide an updated quantity surveyors report to confirm the actual costs
of the restoration works required to restore the heritage item in accordance with the
structural engineers.
The applicant provide documentary evidence of the alternative alterations and additions
considered as alternatives to the demolition of the item.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 12
This is Page No 12 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
(Panel Reason: The Panel was unable to determine the development application on the written
information submitted. The panel notes the verbal submissions of the applicant and its Heritage
consultant made at the meeting but is unable to base the formation of the opinion required to
allow demolition on these verbal representations. The appointment of a mutually agreed
heritage consultant to undertake an assessment of the heritage significance of the building is
considered to be a pre requisite prior to any determination)
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 13
DA No: 343/16
ADDRESS: Montpellier Street, Neutral Bay (Forsyth Park)
PROPOSAL: Installation of 4 x 21m high lighting poles on Forsyth Park
field No.1
REPORT BY NAME: KGPS - Kerry Gordon.
(Fee for Service)
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Council DA
APPLICANT: North Sydney Council - Kate Bambrick-Brown
Public submissions
No persons elected to speak on this item.
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel.
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 13
This is Page No 13 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
ITEM 14
DA No: 368/16
ADDRESS: 1 Bradly Avenue (aka 1 Stannards Place), Kirribilli
PROPOSAL: Alterations and additions to marina including two storey
building; single storey workshop, extension of board walk;
new timber skid; increase marina berths from 14 to 15.
REPORT BY NAME: Geoff Mossemenear, Executive Planner
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
Public Interest
APPLICANT: Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd - Michael Standley
Public submissions
Russell Debney - submitter
Michael Standley - applicant
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel.
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 15
DA No: 5/16/2
ADDRESS: 46 Jeffreys Street, Kirribilli
PROPOSAL: Modifications to DA No 5/16 for the deletion of deferred
commencement condition AA1 (iii) requiring the ceiling height
of the proposed lower ground floor rear addition to be lower
than the gutter line of the service wing.
REPORT BY NAME: Judith Elijah, Student Assessment Officer
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
The application is reported to North Sydney Independent
Planning Panel for determination as the deferred
commencement condition of the original consent was imposed
by the Panel.
APPLICANT: MSB Design Pty Ltd - Matt Beggs
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 14
This is Page No 14 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
Public submissions
Christine Dixon - submitter
Lindsey Tompkins - submitter
Matt Beggs - applicant
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer’s Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel.
The panel notes that the matters raised by the submitters are not relevant to the section 96(1a)
determination.
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
ITEM 16
DA No: 358/16
ADDRESS: 26 & 28 Jeffrey Street, Kirribilli
PROPOSAL: Alterations and additions to terraces and change of use to
allow offices associated with an educational establishment
REPORT BY NAME: Lara Huckstepp, Executive Planner
REASON FOR NSIPP
REFERRAL:
History and use of the site
APPLICANT: David Green
Public submissions
Peter South - submitter
Leigh Sheridan - submitter
Simon Rainsford - architect for St Aloysius
Business Item Recommendations
The Council Officer's Recommendation is endorsed by the Panel subject to the following
changes to conditions C1, C16, C18 and I9 and new conditions C22 and I11:
Privacy
C1. The following privacy devices are to be provided:
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 15
This is Page No 15 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
a) All south-facing windows (excluding the stair enclosure) shall be provided with
obscure glazing to their lower panes and these lower panes shall be fixed/non
openable.
b) Two new north-facing windows (serving the ground level kitchen and the first floor
WC) shall be provided with obscure glazing to their lower panes and the lower
panes on the kitchen window shall be fixed / non openable with both panes on the
first floor WC window shall be fixed / non openable. c) The north-facing ground floor WC shall be provided with obscure glazing and shall
be fixed/non-openable.
d) The north-facing first floor stairwell window shall be provided with obscure
glazing to the lower pane and the lower pane shall be fixed/non-openable.
The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and specifications
submitted fully satisfy the requirements of this condition prior to the release of the
Construction Certificate.
(Reason: Privacy)
Garbage and Recycling Facilities
C16. Adequate provision must be made for the storage of waste and recyclable material
generated by the premises. All garbage bins shall be stored at the rear on No.26
Jeffrey Street. Plans and specifications which comply with this condition must be
submitted to the Certifying Authority for approval prior to the issue of any Construction
Certificate. The Certifying Authority must ensure that the building plans and
specifications submitted, referenced on and accompanying the issued Construction
Certificate, fully satisfy the requirements of this condition.
(Reason: To ensure the provision of appropriate waste facilities and to ensure
efficient collection of waste by collection contractors)
Noise from Plant and Equipment
C18. The use of all plant and equipment installed on the premises must not:
(a) Contribute an LAeq(15min) which will cause the total LAeq(15min) from all plant
and equipment operating contemporaneously on the site to exceed the RBL by more
than 5dB when measured at the boundary of any affected receiver during the day and
evening and not exceeding the background level at night (10.00pm – 6am). The
modifying factor adjustments in Section 4 of the EPA Industrial Noise Policy shall be
applied.
(b) Cause “offensive noise” as defined in the Protection of the Environment Operations
Act 1997.
“affected receiver” includes residential premises (including any lot in the strata scheme
or another strata scheme), premises for short-term accommodation, schools, hospitals,
places of worship, commercial premises and parks and such other affected receiver as
may be notified by the Council in writing.
“boundary” includes any window or elevated window of an affected receiver.
NORTH SYDNEY INDEPENDENT PLANNING PANEL – 01/03/2017 Page No 16
This is Page No 16 of the Minutes of the North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
Meeting held on Wednesday 1 March 2017.
Terms in this condition have the same meaning as in the Noise Guide for Local
Government and the Industrial Noise Policy published by the NSW Environment
Protection Authority.
(Reason: To maintain an appropriate level of amenity for adjoining land uses)
Plan of Management
I9. The Plan of Management titled ’Plan of Management – Administration & Finance
Department’ dated 2 February 2017 and received by council on 9 February 2017, shall
be amended to include the ongoing operational conditions I1 to I8 inclusive of this
consent, shall form part of this development consent and shall be adhered to at all times.
(Reason: To comply with the terms of this development consent)
AC Condenser
C22. One of the new AC condenser units shall be relocated to the rear yard on No.26 Jeffrey
Street.
(Reason: Amenity of neighbours)
Signage
I11. Small signs shall be installed on both sides of the door/gate at the front entry and rear
courtyard to inform and remind all staff entering and exiting the premises to be mindful
of noise to neighbouring residential properties.
(Reason: Amenity of neighbours)
The Panel is of the opinion that the further development of heritage listed terraces in the
absence of a master plan for educational establishments, must be carefully considered having
regard to the residential nature of the area which is part of the heritage conservation area.
Voting was as follows: Unanimous
Panel Member Yes No Panel Member Yes No
Jan Murrell X Ian Pickles X
Francesca O’Brien X Peter Brennan X
The public meeting concluded at 7.45 pm.
The Panel Determination session commenced at 8.00pm.
The Panel Determination session concluded at 11.10pm.
Endorsed by Jan Murrell
North Sydney Independent Planning Panel
1 March 2017