North American Water Loss Conference
2017
New Electronic Billing Meter Standards
Shocking Utilities & Customers
Veolia North America December 4, 2017
PAGE 2
Draft and commercial in confidence
Purpose of today’s presentation
▪ Electronic Billing Meters C715 –DRAFT under review by Standards Council & Public Review
▪ How electronic meters work & challenges they can address
▪ What to learn and what to unlearn –challenges to meter operations & customer relations
▪ Challenges & opportunities
Overview
Setting the Stage
Impacts on Meter Operations
Summary
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 3
Draft and commercial in confidence
Drivers for Electronic Metering
•Water/wastewater service costs rising at substantial rates
•Resource scarcity•Customer usage patterns changing
•Cut backs in staffing & higher labor costs. Retirement of skilled field staff
•More sensitivity to looking at total whole life costs of ownership (acquisition, installation, maintenance, revenue performance etc.)
Overview
•Alignment of meter life with reading automation technology life – single site maintenance visit.
In Search of Measurement Nirvana
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 4
Draft and commercial in confidence
Electronic Revenue Meter Standard – AWWA C715
2016 - Subcommittee completed first ballot-ready draft for Meter Standards Committee action
3
2011-AWWA Standards Council authorized development of standard
1
2012 - Subcommittee of Meter Standards Committee formed to draft contents – Don Faber Chair
2
2017 - Meter Standards Committee – reached consensus for further action
4
Overview
2017 - AWWA Standards Council review & Public Comment (due 11/13/17)
5
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 5
Draft and commercial in confidence
Series of Ballots to Refine Standards Document
Sub-committee discussion –Accept, Modify, Reject, Override
Standard language drafted by subcommittee
Reviewed by Committee Members – Accept, Modify or Reject (Propose changes)
Standards Members – Accept, Withdraw, Reject. Committee has final say on negative ballots
Overview
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 6
Draft and commercial in confidence
Major Items in the Draft Standard
Partial List -Manufacturersw/Electronic Meters
Honeywell (AMCO/Elster)
Badger Meter
Diehl
Mueller
Kamstrup
Master Meter
Metron Farnier
Neptune
Sensus
Zenner
Two accuracy levels. Type 1 - for very low flows; Type 2 - similar to mechanical meters.
Definitions – mostly unique to electronic meters
Ability to handle ambient & water temps up to 150°F
Laying lengths - threaded ends as PD meter standards; flange end same as turbine standards.
Normal flow limits accuracy range remains at 98.5% to 101.5%.
Low flow rate accuracy range 95% to 105%. Current PD is 101%.
Requires full pipe to operate properly. Register will indicate empty or partially filled pipe
Overview
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 7
Draft and commercial in confidence
Flow Rate & Accuracy Improvements For Type I - 1” & SmallerOverview
75% to 80% earlier start in normal test flow range
56% to 70% reduction in Min Test Flow Rate
Narrower gap between low & normal flow accuracy
Same Safe Max Operating Capacity but no restriction on usage at this flow rate (10% of usage or 2 hours/24 hour period)
33% less allowable head loss
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 8
Draft and commercial in confidence
Flow Rate & Accuracy Improvements For Type I - 1 1/2”-8”Overview
Same Safe Max Operating Capacity as PD for 1 ½” & 2” and Compound for 3” through 8”; lower than Turbine Class II.
No Max Continuous Flow rating restriction
Normal test flow range starts earlier compared to PD & Turbine, but not Compound
Better accuracy at lower flow rates for PD & Turbine, but not Compound
Lower head loss for PD and Compound, but not Turbine
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 9
Draft and commercial in confidence
Next Steps to Finalize Standard C715
Standards Council balloting ended 10/10/17
Public Review comment period concluded 11/13/17
Number of comments received; under review by C-715 & Meter Standards Chairs to determine approach for resolution
Might push out process couple of months
AWWA Board of Directors approval vote scheduled for January 2018
Standard published 1st or 2nd quarter 2018
Substantive technical changes - returned to Meters Standards Committee for action. Must then go through another round of Standards Council and Public Review.
Overview
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 10
Draft and commercial in confidence
How Electronic Meters Work – Mag Meter Type
Employs Faraday’s Law of magnetic induction to sense the flow of water
Flow of conductive liquid (water)
Through a magnetic field
Causes a voltage signal
Sensed by electrodes located on the flow tube walls
iPerl, Accumag, HbMag, Tru/Mag, ModMag
Setting the Stage
No one said Science would be involved in this presentation
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 11
Draft and commercial in confidence
How Electronic Meters Work - Ultrasonic Type
Uses sound waves to determine the velocity of water flowing through a pipe
Sends & receives ultrasonic waves between transducers
Upstream & downstream in the pipe
No flow – same time between transducers
With flow – upstream waves slower than downstream. Time increases with velocity
E-Series, Octave, flowIQ2100, Diehl, MACH 10, Sonata
Setting the Stage
More Science – Doppler Effect Sound has shorter or longer wavelengths depending on
location of the source
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 12
Draft and commercial in confidence
Problems Solved & New Challenges Created
Flow restrictions – nearly open pipe, slight reduction for electronics
Need customer profile information to better determine size and type selection
Sampling rate – mag; frequency at which charges are passed between electrodes
Sampling loop – ultrasonic; frequency at which sound waves are passed between transducers
Starting flow – flow rate at which meter begins recording consumption. Flow below starting rate is entirely missed. Accuracy rate can vary.
Battery life – 2” & smaller typically 20 years; not replaceable. 3” & larger 6 to 10 years depending on size. Some models have replaceable batteries
Maintenance – No parts within meter can be maintained. Replace meter when battery is depleted. Clean off sensors if scale develops. No interchangeability of electronic registers
Setting the Stage
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 13
Draft and commercial in confidence
Problems Solved & New Challenges Created
Installation – need to follow manufacturer’s instructions. Impacts accuracy & warranty
Five pipe diameters upstream; two downstream.
Empty pipe -keep the pipe full. Slugs of air will cause inaccurate readings.
Reduce turbulence - can use strainers to reduce pipe diameters –check with manufacturer.
Very few problems caused by pipe vibration.
Setting the Stage
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 14
Draft and commercial in confidence
Problems Solved & New Challenges Created
No accuracy degradation like mechanical meters. Testing issues:
Frequency of testing unknown & not comparable to mechanical meters
Flow rates extremely low and bench or field equipment might be less capable of testing accurately
Follow manufacturers’ recommendations
Testing process can be rather long to ensure accurate test
Meter Standards Committee plans to send out supplemental guidelines as M6 revisions not due till 2019
Meter setting conditions need consideration in determining field or bench testing is best approach
Don’t know what we don’t know. Experiences might not translate from one utility to another.
Setting the Stage
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 15
Draft and commercial in confidence
New Utility Challenges for Deploying Electronic Meters
Challenges
• No AWWA standard to guide utilities– draft approved by Meter Standards Committee
• When battery dies, meter must be replaced. Last reading held.
– Impacts deployment strategy. Coordinate timing with AMR system.
• Larger meters may have non-US laying lengths-need spool piece. Adds to purchase & install costs
• Since no strainers needed to protect measuring element – no downstream protection of other utility or customer equipment; need to decide about strainer use
• Not all manufacturer’s have full product line for all sizes or mix measurement technologies (ultrasonic for some sizes and mag for other)
• Testing protocols can be extremely long & at different flow rates than mechanical meters
• Might not have UL or FM ratings for fire applications/need to address strainer issues
Meter Ops Impacts
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 16
Draft and commercial in confidence
New Utility Challenges for Deploying Electronic Meters
Challenges
• Most test benches cannot verify ultra low flow accuracy claims
– Difficult to enforce accuracy warranties
– Very long time to verify ultra low flow accuracy
• No test plug in meter body - Need downstream test T in spool if want to field test
• Register built in so no interchangeable parts
• Sensitive to meter setting configuration – need to follow manufacturer instructions
• Carefully review warranties for battery & accuracy provisions
• All features of electronic registers might not be compatible with every manufacturers’ AMR/AMI system
– Might limit which meters can be used
– Might require more manual procedures for detecting problems
• For Type I electronic meters, allowance of up to 105% accuracy at minimum flow rates might be a PR challenge for billing disputes
Meter Ops Impacts
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 17
Draft and commercial in confidence
Customer profiling data exposes potential meter selection & performance issues
17
LOGGING CHARACTERISTICSMeter: 90154239Meter size: 6”Meter type: CompoundPremise: Office BuildingAddress: 800 W 6TH ST, Los Angeles, CA, 90017Date: 8/11 – 8/17
- Peak flow: 57.78 GPM- Average flow: 6.91 GPM- 75% of volume & 32% of time in cross over range- Meter rated up to 2000 gpm
Meter Ops Impacts
PAGE 18
Draft and commercial in confidence
New testing protocols along with customer profiling found cross over performance issues & revenue gain opportunities
Type 3” 4” 6” 8” 10”
Compound 100% 100% 99%
Fire 98% 99% 99%
Turbine 100% 96% 99% 100% 98%
Accuracy of 188 Meters Tested Using Old Protocols & Arithmetic Averages
Accuracy of 123 Meters Using New Protocols & Data Logging Weights
Type 3” 4” 6” 8” 10”
Compound 94% 95% 95%
Fire 94% 95%
Turbine 98% 98% 94% 98%
Old protocols - .2% annual accuracy degradation
New protocols & logging - 1.15% annual degradation
Target only under performing meters Replace 1,200 meters - $23 million
annually
Meter Ops Impacts
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 19
Draft and commercial in confidence
Impacts on Utility Operations
Address meter “inflation” issues
Size of meters are increasing as usage and flow rates of usage are declining (Residential End Uses of Water V2)
More capital being used than needed (current & future replacement costs)
Loss of revenue (leaks, low flows, accuracy degradation)
Impact on future growth if hydraulic equivalent of meter is used to allocate available water resource
Used with permission from Craig Hanna, Johnson Controls
Meter Ops Impacts
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 20
Draft and commercial in confidence
New opportunities & new challenges
What problems does the technology solve for you? What new issues does it create that must be addressed?
New knowledge needed to optimize application
What is that knowledge & how do I get it?
Learn from others, but learn from your own applications.
Structure research projects.
“As built” different than AWWA Standards
Carefully read all technical information to understand benefits & challenges
Summary
Tuesday, December 19, 2017 LADWP Operating Efficiencies PAGE 21
Draft and commercial in confidence
New opportunities & new challenges
No measurement technology is universal. Use the right technology in the right application.
Usage patterns, mechanical wear, and water quality are major drivers that impact accuracy and revenues
Usage patterns at accounts can change. Be aware when changes occur.
Design, materials, manufacturing does matter
Know and understand your cost drivers. Whole life cost of ownership might help determine best value
Will performance = promise?
Summary
North American Water Loss Conference
2017
New Electronic Billing Meter Standards
Shocking Utilities & CustomersKenneth Molli, Director, Metering Initiatives
Veolia North America
312.316.7020