Download - Negotiation
-
NEGOTIATIONNEGOTIATION
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Definition of NegotiationDefinition of Negotiation
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
It is a dialogue between two or more people
or parties, intended to reach an
understanding, resolve point of difference or understanding, resolve point of difference or
gain advantage in outcome of dialogue, so as
to satisfy the various interests of the people
or parties involved in negotiation process
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Key Elements of Negotiation ProcessProcess
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
It is concerned with resolving conflict between two or
more parties, usually by the exchange of concessions
It can be competitive known as win-loose negotiation, or it
can be cooperative, known as win-win
It should be regarded as a potentially beneficial activities It should be regarded as a potentially beneficial activities
for both parties
Each party involved in negotiating tries to gain an
advantage for themselves by the end of the process
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
It occurs in business, non-profit organizations, government
branches, legal proceedings, among nations
Professional negotiators are often specialized, such
as union negotiators, leverage buyout negotiators, peace
negotiators, hostage negotiators
They usually work under other titles, such as Diplomats,
Legislators or Brokers
According to Robert Fisher and William Ury, Negotiation
is a basic means of getting what you want from others
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Preparation and Planning
Clarification and Justification
Definition and Ground Rules
Clarification and Justification
Bargaining and Problem Solving
Closure and Implementation
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Features of NegotiationFeatures of Negotiation
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Minimum of 2 parties are present
Both parties have predetermined works
There is an outcome
Both parties believe the outcome of the negotiation may be
satisfactorysatisfactory
Both parties are willing to modify their position
The parties understand the purpose of negotiation
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Skills of a Successful NegotiatorSuccessful Negotiator
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Good manners and relaxed attitude
Patience
Be open-minded
Not rushing to agree
Not being passive Not being passive
Being positive
Ready to compromise
Clarifying each point of agreement
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Negotiation StrategiesNegotiation Strategies
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Distributive Negotiation
The term distributive implies that there is a finite amount
of a thing being distributed or divided among the people
involved
Sometimes this type of negotiation is referred to as the Sometimes this type of negotiation is referred to as the
distribution of a fixed pie.
There is only so much to go around, but the proportion to
be distributed is variable
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Distributive negotiation is also sometimes called win-lose
because of the assumption that one person's gain results in
another person's loss.
A distributive negotiation often involves people who have
never had a previous interactive relationship; nor are theynever had a previous interactive relationship; nor are they
likely to do so again in the near future
Simple everyday examples would be buying a car or a
house
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Integrative Negotiation
The word integrative implies some cooperation
Integrative negotiation often involves a higher degree of
trust and the forming of a relationship.
It can also involve creative problem-solving that aims to It can also involve creative problem-solving that aims to
achieve mutual gains.
It is also sometimes called win-win negotiation or interest-
based or principled negotiation
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
It provides an alternative to traditional distributive
negotiation techniques.
Distributive negotiation assumes there is a fixed amount of
value (a fixed pie) to be divided between the parties
Integrative negotiation often attempts to create value in Integrative negotiation often attempts to create value in
the course of the negotiation (expand the pie).
It focuses on the underlying interests of the parties rather
than their arbitrary starting positions, approaches
negotiation as a shared problem rather than a personalized
battle
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Types of Negotiation TechniquesTechniques
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Haggling:
It is the orthodox procedure of labor negotiation
Piecemeal Approach:
In this approach issues are settled one by one that is from
beginning to end of the draft demand.beginning to end of the draft demand.
Total approach:
In this approach the issues are thought to be interrelated
and interdependent .
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Boulwarism :
In this procedure the company refuses to play the
haggling game.
The company makes its first offer a full and final one.
In addition to meeting with union representatives, the
company conducts an extensive communication program
It tries to sell its offers directly to the employees and
urges them to make there view known to their union
officials
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Negotiation StylesNegotiation Styles
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Individuals can often have strong dispositions towards
numerous styles
The style used during a negotiation depends primarily on
the context and the interests of the party
More importantly, styles can change over time More importantly, styles can change over time
Negotiation styles are broadly classified into 5 main
categories
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Accommodating
Avoiding
Collaborating
Competing
Compromising
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Accommodating
Individuals who enjoy solving the other partys problems and
preserving personal relationships
Accommodators are sensitive to the emotional states, body
language, and verbal signals of the other parties
However, they feel taken advantage of in situations when
the other party places little emphasis on the relationship
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Avoiding
Individuals who do not like to negotiate and dont do it
unless warranted
When negotiating, avoiders tend to defer and dodge the
confrontational aspects of negotiating
However, they may be perceived as tactful and diplomatic
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Collaborating
Individuals who enjoy negotiations that involve solving
tough problems in creative ways
Collaborators are good at using negotiations to understand
the concerns and interests of the other partiesthe concerns and interests of the other parties
However, they can create problems by transforming
simple situations into more complex ones
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Competing
Individuals who enjoy negotiations because it presents an
opportunity to win something
Competitive negotiators have strong instincts for all
aspects of negotiating and are often strategic
competitive negotiators often neglect the importance of
relationships because of their dominating style
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Compromising
Individuals who are eager to close the deal by doing what
is fair and equal for all parties involved in the negotiation
Compromisers can be useful when there is limited time to
complete the deal
However, compromisers often unnecessarily rush the
negotiation process and make concessions too quick
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Types of NegotiatorsTypes of Negotiators
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Three basic kinds of negotiators have been identified by
researchers involved in The Harvard Negotiation Project
These types of negotiators are:
Soft Negotiators
Hard Negotiators Hard Negotiators
Principled Negotiators
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Soft bargainers
They choose a gentle style of bargaining and make offers
which are not in their best interests
They yield to others demands, avoid confrontation, and they
maintain good relations with fellow negotiatorsmaintain good relations with fellow negotiators
Their perception of others is one of friendship, and their goal
is agreement
They insist on agreement, offering solutions and easily trusting
others and changing their opinions
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Hard Negotiators
They use contentious strategies and utilize phrases such as
this is my final offer and take it or leave it
They make threats, are distrustful of others, insist on their
position, and apply pressure to negotiate
They see others as adversaries and their ultimate goal is
victory
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Principled Negotiators
They focus on the problem rather than the intentions, motives,
and needs of the people involved
They separate the people from the problem, explore interests,
avoid bottom lines, and reach results based on standardsavoid bottom lines, and reach results based on standards
They base their choices on objective criteria rather than power,
pressure, self interest, or an arbitrary decisional procedure
The objective criteria may be drawn from moral standards,
principles of fairness, professional standards, tradition etc.,
Raihan Taqui Syed
-
Thank You!!!Thank You!!!
Raihan Taqui Syed