N400 in Depression 1
Running head: N400 and Emotional Words in Depression and Schizophrenia
Semantic Processing of Emotional Words in Depression and Schizophrenia
Heide Klumpp1, Jennifer Keller2, Gregory A. Miller3, Brooks R. Casas4,
Jennifer L. Best5, and Patricia J. Deldin1
1University of Michigan 2Stanford University School of Medicine 3University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 4Baylor University 5Duke University Number of text pages: 11 Number of tables: 3 Heide Klumpp, Ph.D. University of Michigan 4250 Plymouth Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5766 Phone: (734) 764-5348 Fax: (734) 764-4031
E-mail: [email protected]
N400 in Depression 2
Abstract
Major depressive disorder is associated with dysfunction in brain regions involved in language
and emotion processing. Despite evidence of emotion processing biases in depression,
neurophysiological evidence of language dysfunction for emotional words in depression has
been inconsistent. This series of three studies evaluated whether depressed individuals
exhibited abnormal semantic processing of emotionally valenced words. During the passive
viewing of sentences with mood congruent and incongruent sentence endings, the N400
component of the event-related brain potential was measured in patients with depression,
dysthymia, or schizophrenia and in healthy controls. In each study, results revealed normal
semantic processing in depression. That is, N400 was similar for both mood-incongruent
(positive and neutral) endings and mood-congruent (negative) endings. In contrast, the small
sample of individuals with schizophrenia exhibited a significantly exaggerated N400 for negative
word endings compared to the depressed and healthy control groups. These data suggest
anomalies in semantic network interactions with emotion processing in schizophrenia.
Key Words: depression, schizophrenia, semantic processing, N400, emotional words, biases,
ERP
N400 in Depression 3
Semantic Processing of Emotional Words in Depression and Schizophrenia
Introduction
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and disabling psychiatric illness that has
been hypothesized to be associated with a general dysfunction in the left frontal lobe (e.g.,
Davidson et al., 2002; Heller and Nitschke, 1997). Bilateral dysfunction in the dorsolateral
prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has also been proposed (Johnstone et al., 2007; Levin et al., 2007;
Mayberg, 2006). Although these brain regions are involved in language processing, individuals
with depression do not have consistent language deficits (for a review see Klumpp and Deldin,
this issue) and do not show semantic processing difficulties with neutral words manifested in the
N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) (Deldin et al., 2006; Iakimova et al.,
2009), an index of semantic processing (Kutas and Hillyard, 1980a, b). The failure to find
consistent language dysfunction suggests that the purported left frontal or bilateral DLPFC
deficits may be task-specific and would necessitate a revision of models away from particular
cognitive deficits towards more complex neural network models that account for interactions
among brain regions (e.g., cortical-subcortical). Support for this hypothesis and the potential for
individual differences in neural function is supported by a review of brain functioning in
depression (Fitzgerald et al., 2008), which noted inconsistent results across studies. These
investigators propose that the pathophysiology of depression is likely complex and not
amenable to simple models. For example, it may be the case that language dysfunction in
depression is more likely to manifest when emotional stimuli are being presented, as the
potential for dysfunctional neural interactions that involve emotion processing is increased.
Behavioral evidence in support of this includes studies that show that individuals diagnosed with
MDD are more likely to have cognitive biases towards negative stimuli (Caseras et al., 2007;
Gotlib et al., 2004; Mathews et al., 1996) or away from positive stimuli (e.g., Deldin et al., 2001;
Joormann and Gotlib, 2006; Surguladze et al., 2004; Yoon et al., 2009) than general non-
emotional language processing deficits.
N400 in Depression 4
Regarding semantic processing, behavioral studies of depression show equivocal
evidence of dysfunction for emotional words. For example, some provide evidence of biased
responses to negative words (enhanced response latency for negative words; Weisbrod et al.,
1999), partial evidence of such bias (Atchley et al., 2003), and lack of evidence of semantic
dysfunction (Dannlowski et al., 2006). Other behavioral studies show normal semantic
processing for neutral words in MDD (Besche-Richard et al., 2002; Georgieff et al., 1998).
Thus, relatively few behavioral studies have investigated semantic processing of emotional
words, and the results of this limited literature are inconsistent.
Neurophysiological studies examining emotional language processing are also
equivocal, and results depend upon on the specific process examined. For example, some
ERP components detect enhanced processing of emotional words in depression (e.g., P300,
P2, N2, PINV; Nikendei et al., 2005; Serfaty et al., 2002; Shimizu et al., 2006), whereas N100
and CNV (Nikendei et al., 2005; Serfaty et al., 2002) indicate normal language processing in
depression. However, semantic processing of emotional words as indexed by N400 has not
been evaluated in MDD.
In the present series of three studies, MDD and healthy control participants were
presented sentences with mood congruent and incongruent emotional endings in order to
assess whether individuals diagnosed with mood disorders have normal emotional semantic
processing. Participants passively viewed the sentences while their ERPs were recorded. If
emotional semantic processing errors occurs in depression, participants will display increased
N400 for emotionally incongruent (i.e., positive word) endings compared to healthy controls.
Alternatively, if language processing, regardless of emotional valence is normal in depression,
no differences between the depressed and healthy control groups will be found.
One of the three studies included dysthymic participants in order to determine if
semantic processing deficits extended to a second mood disorder group. Another of the studies
included individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, as language disturbance (e.g., abnormal
N400 in Depression 5
associations) is a hallmark of this illness and should be associated with N400 abnormalities
(Adams et al., 1993; Hokama et al., 2003; Kiang et al., 2007; Kostova et al., 2003, 2005; Ohta et
al., 1999; Sitnikova et al., 2002; Strandburg et al., 1997). Moreover, there is evidence of
abnormal emotion processing in schizophrenia (An et al., 2003; Bell et al., 1997; Berenbaum et
al., 2008; Dougherty et al., 1974; Kring and Moran, 2008; Suslow et al., 2003). Hence,
schizophrenia is a relevant comparison group for MDD and may highlight the sensitivity of the
task in detecting N400 anomalies.
Methods Participants
Individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) were recruited from an
acute inpatient psychiatry unit in a moderate-size, mid-western city (Studies 1 and 2) and from a
large eastern city (Study 3). Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia (SCZ) were recruited
from an inpatient unit (Study 2). Individuals with dysthymia and non-patient comparison
participants were recruited from both communities via newspaper advertisements and paid $5-
$10/per hour for participation. Inpatient MDD and SCZ participants were not paid for
participation. For all studies, left-handed participants were excluded. Participants were
diagnosed with current MDD (Studies 1-3), dysthymic disorder (Study 3), or schizophrenia
(Study 2) using the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-III-R (Study 1) or DSM-IV (Studies
2 and 3) (SCID; First et al., 1996; Spitzer et al., 1990). To ensure diagnostic consensus,
interviews for Studies 1 and 2 were completed by advanced doctoral students in clinical
psychology closely supervised by a clinical psychologist (GAM). In Study 3, a clinical
psychologist (PJD) and advanced graduate students conducted the clinical interviews.
Participants were included in the study only if a consensus diagnosis was reached by trained
supervisees of PJD in a review of taped interviews.
Physiological Recording
N400 in Depression 6
The electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from nine International 10-20 System
sites (Jasper, 1958): Fz, Cz, Pz, F3, C3, P3, F4, C4, and P4, referenced to the left mastoid
(Studies 1 and 2) or left earlobe (Study 3). EEG activity recorded from the right mastoid or right
earlobe was subsequently used to compute an average mastoid reference ([A1+A2]/2; Miller et
al., 1991). In Studies 1 and 2, Beckman miniature Ag-AgCl electrodes were used for the EEG
recording. In Study 3, EEG was collected using a tin-electrode cap (Electro-Cap International,
Inc., Eaton, OH). For all three studies, two orthogonal channels of the electro-oculogram (EOG)
recorded vertical and horizontal eye movements using electrodes placed near the outer canthi
and at left supra- and suborbital sites. Impedances were kept below 10 kΩ.
EEG was amplified using a Grass Model 12 (Studies 1 and 2) or an S. A. Instruments
Custom Bioamp polygraph (Study 3) with a .01-30 Hz analog bandpass filter. Data were
sampled at 125 Hz (Studies 1 and 2) or 512 Hz (Study 3) for 1400 ms beginning 200 ms prior to
the onset of the last word in each sentence.
Procedure
After an initial interview that screened prospective participants for handedness, head
injury, seizures, normal or corrected-to-normal vision, major medical illness, and developmental
disabilities, eligible participants were given an individual lab tour and provided written consent
prior to the SCID diagnostic interview.
Participants returned within 30 days for the electrophysiological portion of the study. On
average, the length of time between the diagnostic interview and EEG study was 2 weeks.
Following electrode application, participants were instructed to relax and focus on the screen in
front of them. Consistent with other depression and schizophrenia studies (e.g., Adams et al.,
1993; Deldin et al., 2006; Kuperberg et al., 2006), sentences were presented one word at a
time. Thus, participants were told that the briefly presented words formed sentences. They
were asked to read the sentences silently and told that they would be asked questions about the
N400 in Depression 7
sentences at the end of the session. Subjects were then presented with a block of 30
sentences; each sentence stem was repeated three times, once each with the terminal word
being a positive, neutral, or negative word (e.g., Today I am feeling (happy, okay, or sad)). The
order of sentence terminal word ending (i.e., negative, positive, neutral) was random within the
constraints that no more than four of the same type occurred consecutively. Additionally,
sentences were counterbalanced such that the first presentation, used for N400 analyses,
varied in emotional ending. Sentences were 6-8 words in length. The inter-stimulus interval
was 400 ms: each word appeared on the screen for 200 ms, with 200 ms of blank screen
between each word. An inter-trial interval of 2600 ms occurred between the offset of the last
word of a sentence, indicated by a period, and the onset of the next sentence.
Stimuli. First, a list of emotional adjectives was compiled from several studies
(Anderson, 1968; Bellezza et al., 1986) and was supplemented by the experimenters. Students
then rated each word on five-point Likert scale for happy/sad, arousing/calm, and
dominant/passive. Valence ratings for the chosen types of words (positive, neutral, and
negative) were found to be significantly different, F(4,85)=346.58, p<.001. Words were also
classified as either high or low arousal. Emotional words (positive and negative) had reliably
high and similar arousal ratings relative to neutral words, F(4,85)=152.28, p<.001. In addition,
average length, F(4,85)=1.66, p<.17, and frequency, F(4,85)=.14, p<.97, of the terminal words
were comparable across stimulus conditions. A total of 90 emotion sentences were then
developed using a base sentence and various terminal words chosen using the ratings
discussed above. The sentences were the same across the three studies.
Data Reduction and Analyses
Eye movement correction procedures were performed (Gratton et al., 1983; Miller et al.,
1988, for Studies 1 and 2; James Long Co., unpublished, for Study 3). Sentence type was
categorized according to the valence of the word (positive, neutral, or negative) that ended the
N400 in Depression 8
sentence. EEG was manually inspected for the presence of residual eye movements or EMG
artifact, and contaminated epochs were removed from the analysis. Within-subject average
ERP waveforms were computed for each site and valence type. N400 scores were computed
as the average voltage between 300 and 600 ms deviated from a 200 ms pre-stimulus baseline.
______________________________
Insert Fig 1 about here
______________________________
Data analysis. For each study, N400 scores collapsed across the midline (Fz, Cz, Pz)
were submitted to a Group [MDD, nondepressed (Studies 1, 2 and 3); MDD, SCZ,
nondepressed controls (Study 2); or MDD, dysthymia, nondepressed (Study 3)] x Valence
(positive, neutral, negative) repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). ANOVAs were
supplemented with simple-effects ANOVAs and Bonferroni tests as needed to interpret effects
significant at the two-tailed, 0.05 level. Reported probability values reflect the Huynh and Feldt
(1976) degrees of freedom correction. Finally, consistency of the three individual studies were
then confirmed using the Stouffer meta-analytic procedure (Bush et al., 1954) to determine
whether each group exhibited statistically significant N400 scores (area measurement) for
positive, neutral, or negative words. In this procedure (Bush et al., 1954), p values for the
studies were converted to z scores, which were summed and divided by the square root of the
number of studies.
Results
Participant Characteristics
Demographics. Across studies demographic characteristics were similar among MDD,
dysthymia, and healthy control groups (see Table 1). The schizophrenia group had
proportionally more males and was less educated than the other groups. These characteristics
N400 in Depression 9
are consistent with evidence that males have a higher lifetime risk of developing schizophrenia
(Tandon et al., 2008) and are less likely to complete high school (e.g., Carr et al., 2004).
______________________________
Insert Table 1 about here
______________________________
Within-Study Results for Positive, Neutral, and Negative Words
Figure 1 present ERP grand averages for each study, and Tables 2 and 3 provide
ANOVA results. Across all three studies, there was no difference in N400 amplitude between
the healthy controls and the depressed groups (both major depression and dysthymia). This
result was confirmed with the meta-analytical procedure (see Table 2). The only significant
result concerned the SCZ group (Study 2). Follow-up 3 (Group: MDD, SCZ, control) x 3
(Valence: negative, positive, neutral) simple-effects ANOVAs were conducted for each word
type. Differences were found for negative (F (2, 32)= 4.28, p<.02) but not positive (F (2, 32)=
1.51, p=.24) or neutral (F (2, 32)= 2.34, p=.11) words. Post-hoc Bonferroni comparisons for
negative word endings revealed larger N400 in schizophrenia patients compared to major
depression (p<.05) and healthy control (p<.03) groups. There was no difference between the
MDD and healthy controls (p=.99).
______________________________
Insert Tables 2 and 3 about here
______________________________
Discussion
N400 results suggest normal language function during emotion processing in
depression. Thus, N400 as a measure of semantic integration (Brown and Hagoort, 1993) is
not impaired for emotionally-valenced words. These results point to models of depression that
N400 in Depression 10
emphasize diverse functional disruptions in neural networks (e.g., Fitzgerald et al., 2008;
Mathews et al., 2008) rather than discrete cognitive deficits. For example, cortical-subcortical
responses to cognitive and emotional tasks have been shown to differ among depressed
individuals (Siegle et al., 2007). Additionally, brain imaging studies do not consistently show
lateralized effects in depression or reliable neural patterns (e.g., Fitzgerald et al., 2008). Taken
together, accumulating data indicate that abnormal function among brain regions, possibly to
varying degrees (e.g., strength of cortical-subcortical interactions, neural compensatory
processes) may be a factor in individual differences in depression rather than specific deficits
(e.g., hypoactive left frontal lobe). Thus, although particular neural networks are implicated in
depression, the varying ability of a given task to tap into abnormal function and individual
differences in neural network function may help explain mixed results in language processing for
emotional words.
Of note, schizophrenia patients exhibited a larger N400 (more negative response) to
negative words than the depressed or healthy controls, and there was no difference between
these groups in response to positive or neutral sentence endings. This provocative finding
suggests a violation of expectancy only for the negative words, indicating a greater surprise to
negative sentence endings. This finding is consistent with studies that show impaired
processing of emotional stimuli in schizophrenia (e.g., for review see Gold et al., 2009;
Rockstroh et al., 2006). Interestingly, the results in this study were specific to negative valence,
whereas other studies have found differential processing for both positive and negative
valenced stimuli compared to neutral stimuli. While the specific finding argues against a general
deficit, we cannot rule out the possibility that factors such as reading ability and/or working
memory deficits may have impacted results.
Given the small sample size of the schizophrenia group, results are in need of
replication. Nevertheless, results suggest that schizophrenia patients have a relatively large
violation of expectancy to negative sentence endings than do depressed patients and healthy
N400 in Depression 11
controls. This finding may help elucidate cognition-emotion interactions in schizophrenia. For
example, operation of the semantic network structure in schizophrenia is not entirely clear
though it has been recently proposed that problems in schizophrenia involve both an initial
overly activated semantic network and later inhibition difficulties (e.g., failure to rely on context)
(Niznikiewicz et al., in press). The present significant results were restricted to negative word
endings to ambiguous sentences. Therefore, it may be the case that these stimuli reflect problems
integrating negatively-valenced stimuli within a vague context though further study is needed to
better understand the extent to which results reflect early or later semantic network abnormalities.
Limitations of this study include the broad scoring window used to measure N400 (i.e.,
300 ms to 600 ms) to ensure N400 was captured in patient groups. It is possible that results for
some participants may include some later positivity. Additionally, the sample sizes in each
study, particularly schizophrenia patients, were small, which may have reduced our ability to find
within group differences based on the meta-analytic calculations. All the schizophrenia patients
were on medications, and we could not control for medication in that group. Also, although the
word endings were in the first person and intended to be self-referential, the same words were
used in each study. Therefore, it is possible that individual differences for self-referent
emotional words reduced sensitivity to detect N400 effects for mood-incongruent words.
Despite limitations, this study provides further evidence for normal N400 in MDD and
dysthymic participants. This study expands on N400 studies of neutral stimuli by suggesting
N400 to emotional stimuli is also normal in MDD and dysthymia. Finally, this study
demonstrates that schizophrenia patients exhibit abnormal information processing as indexed
by enhanced N400 to negative stimuli thus providing further evidence of the specificity of
cognitive biases in mood disordered participants and disruption of emotional and language
processing in schizophrenia.
N400 in Depression 12
References
Adams, J., Faux, S.F., Nestor, P.G., Shenton, M.E., Marcy, B., Smith, S., 1993. ERP
abnormalities during semantic processing in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 10, 247-
257.
An, S.K., Lee, S.J., Lee, C.H., Cho, H.S., Lee, P.G., Lee, C.I., Lee, E., Roh, K.S., Namkoong,
K., 2003. Reduced P3 amplitudes by negative facial emotional photographs in
schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 64, 125-135.
Anderson, N.H., 1968. Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
9, 272-279.
Atchley, R.A., Ilardi, S.S., Enole, A., 2003. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of
emotional content in word meanings: the effect of current and past depression. Brain
Lang. 84, 105-119.
Bell, M., Bryson, G., Lysaker, P., 1997. Positive and negative affect recognition in
schizophrenia: a comparison with substance abuse and normal control subjects.
Psychiatry Res. 73, 73-82.
Bellezza, F.S., Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., 1986. Words high and low in pleasantness as
rated by male and female college students. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. Comput. 18,
299-303.
Berenbaum, H., Kerns, J.G., Vernon, L.L., Gomez, J.J., 2008. Cognitive correlates of
schizophrenia signs and symptoms: II. Emotional disorders. Psychiatry Res. 159, 157-
162.
Besche-Richard, C., Passerieux, C., Hardy-Baylé, M.-C., 2002. Lexical decision tasks in
depressive patients: semantic priming before and after clinical improvement. Eur.
Psychiatry 17, 69-74.
Brown, C., Hagoort, P., 1993. The processing nature of the N400: evidence from masked
priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 34-44.
N400 in Depression 13
Bush, R.R., Mosteller, F., Thompson, G.L., 1954. A formal structure for multiple-choice
situations. In: Thrall, R.M., Coombs, C.H., Davis, R.L. (Eds), Decision Processes, viii.
332, Oxford, England: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 99-126.
Carr, V.J., Lewin, T.J., Neil, A.L., Halpin, S.A., Holmes, S., 2004. Premorbid, psychosocial and
clinical predictors of the costs of schizophrenia and other psychoses. Br. J. Psychiatry
184, 517-525.
Caseras, X., Garner, M., Bradley, B.P., Mogg, K., 2007. Biases in visual orienting to
negative and positive scenes in dysphoria: an eye movement study. J. Abnorm.
Psychol. 116, 491-497.
Dannlowski, U., Kersting, A., Arolt, V., Lalee-Mentzel, J., Donges, U.S., Suslow, T., 2006.
Unimpaired automatic processing of verbal information in the course of clinical
depression. Depress. Anxiety 23, 325-330.
Davidson, R.J., Pizzagalli, D., Nitschke, J.B., Putnam, K., 2002. Depression: perspectives from
affective neuroscience. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 545-574.
Deldin, P.J., Deveney, C.M., Kim, A.S., Casas, B.R., Best, J.L., 2001. A slow wave
investigation of working memory biases in mood disorders. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 110,
267-281.
Deldin, P., Keller, J., Casas, B.R., Best, J., Gergen, J., Miller, G.A., 2006. Normal N400 in mood
disorders. Biol. Psychol. 71, 74-79.
Dougherty, F.E., Bartlett, E.S., Izard, C.E., 1974. Responses of schizophrenics to expressions
of the fundamental emotions. J. Clin. Psychol. 30, 243-246.
First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J.B.W., 1996. Structured Clinical Interview for
DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-CV). Washington, DC: American
Psychiatric Press, Inc.
Fitzgerald, P.B., Laird, A.R., Maller, J., Daskalakis, Z.J., 2008. A meta-analytic study of
changes in brain activation in depression. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29, 683-695.
N400 in Depression 14
Georgieff, N., Dominey, P.F., Michel, F., Marie-Cardine, M., Dalery, J., 1998. Semantic priming
in major depressive state. Psychiatry Res. 78, 29-44.
Gold, J.M., Hahn, B., Strauss, G.P., Waltz, J.A., 2009. Turning it upside down: areas of
preserved cognitive function in schizophrenia. Neuropsychol. Rev. 19, 294-311.
Gotlib, I.H., Krasnoperova, E., Yue, D.N., Joormann, J., 2004. Attentional biases for
negative interpersonal stimuli in clinical depression. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 113, 127-135.
Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., Donchin, E., 1983. A new method for off-line removal of ocular
artifact. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 55, 468–484.
Heller, W., Nitschke, J., 1997. Regional brain activity in emotion: a framework for understanding
cognition in depression. Cogn. Emot. 11, 637-661.
Hokama, H., Hiramatsu, K.I., Wang, J., O’Donnell, B.F., Ogura, C., 2003. N400 abnormalities
in unmedicated patients with schizophrenia during a lexical decision task. Int.
J. Psychophysiol. 48, 1-10.
Huynh, H., Feldt, L.S., 1976. Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from
sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. J. Educ. Behav. Stat.
1, 69–82.
Iakimova, G., Passerieux, C., Foynard, M., Fiori, N., Besche, C., Laurent, J.P., Hardy-Baylé,
M.C., 2009. Behavioral measures and event-related potentials reveal different
aspects of sentence processing and comprehension in patients with major depression.
J. Affect. Disord. 113, 188-194.
Jasper, H.H., 1958. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation.
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 10, 371-375.
Johnstone, T., van Reekum, C.M., Urry, H.L., Kalin, N.H., Davidson, R.J., 2007. Failure to
regulate: counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal-subcortical circuitry in
major depression. J. Neurosci. 27, 8877-8884.
Joormann, J., Gotlib, I.H., 2006. Is this happiness I see? Biases in the identification of
N400 in Depression 15
emotional facial expressions in depression and social phobia. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 115,
705-714.
Kiang, M., Kutas, M., Light, G.A., Braff, D.L., 2007. Electrophysiological insights into
conceptual disorganization in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Res. 92, 225-236.
Klumpp, H., Deldin, P., in press. Review of brain functioning in depression for semantic
processing and verbal fluency. Int. J. Psychophysiol.
Kostova, M., Passerieux, C., Laurent, J.P., Hardy-Baylé, M.C., 2003. An electrophysiologic
study: can semantic context processes be mobilized in patients with thought-disordered
schizophrenia? Can. J. Psychiatry 48, 615-619.
Kostova, M., Passerieux, C., Laurent, J.P., Hardy-Baylé, M.C., 2005. N400 anomalies in
schizophrenia are correlated with the severity of formal thought disorder. Schizophrenia
Res. 78, 285-291.
Kring, A.M., Moran, E.K., 2008. Emotional response deficits in schizophrenia: insights from
affective science. Schizophr. Bull. 34, 819–834.
Kuperberg, G.R., Sitnikova, T., Goff, D., Holcomb, P.J. 2006. Making sense of sentences in
schizophrenia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal interactions between
semantic and syntactic processing. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 115, 251-265.
Kutas, M., Hillyard, SA., 1980a. Reading senseless sentences: brain potential reflects semantic
incongruity. Science 207, 204-206.
Kutas, M., Hillyard, S.A., 1980b. Reading between the lines: event-related brain potentials
during natural sentence processing. Brain Lang. 11, 354-373.
Levin, R., Heller, W., Mohanty, A., Herrington, J., Miller, G., 2007. Cognitive deficits in
depression and functional specificity of regional brain activity. Cognit. Ther. Res., 31, 211-
233.
Mathews, A., Ridgeway, V., Williamson, D.A., 1996. Evidence for attention to threatening
stimuli in depression. Behav. Res. Ther. 34, 695-705.
N400 in Depression 16
Mathews, S.C., Strigo, I.A., Simmons, A.N., Yang, T.T., Paulus, M.P., 2008. Decreased
functional coupling of the amygdala and supragenual cingulate is related to increased
depression in unmedicated individuals with current major depressive disorder. J Affect
Disord. 111, 13-20.
Mayberg, H.S., 2006. Defining neurocircuits in depression: strategies toward treatment
selection based on neuroimaging phenotypes. Psychiatr Ann. 36, 259-268.
Miller, G.A., Gratton, G., Yee, C.M., 1988. Generalized implementation of an eye movement
correction procedure. Psychophysiology 25, 241–243.
Miller, G.A., Lutzenberger, W., Elbert, T., 1991. The linked-reference issue in EEG and ERP
recording. J. Psychophysiol. 5, 273–276.
Nikendei, C., Dengler, W., Wiedemann, G., Pauli, P., 2005. Selective processing of pain-related
word stimuli in subclinical depression as indicated by event-related brain potentials. Biol.
Psychol. 70, 52-60.
Niznikiewicz, M., Mittal, M.S., Nestor, P.G., McCarley, R.W. in press. Abnormal inhibitory
processes in semantic networks in schizophrenia. Int. J. Psychophysiol.
Ohta, K., Uchiyama, M., Matsushima, E., Toru, M., 1999. An event-related potential study in
schizophrenia using Japanese sentences. Schizophr. Res. 40, 159-170.
Rockstroh, B., Junghöfer, M., Elbert, T., Buodo, G., Miller, G.A., 2006. Electromagnetic brain
activity evoked by affective stimuli in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 43, 431-439.
Serfaty, M.A., Bothwell, R., Marsh, R., Ashton, H., Blizard, R., Scott, J., 2002. Event-related
potentials and cognitive processing of affectively toned words in depression. J.
Psychophysiol. 16, 56-66.
Shimizu, H., Saito, H., Hoshiyama, M., 2006. Cognitive mechanism for meaning of emotive
words in depressed personality: an event-related potential study. Nagoya J. Med. Sci.
68, 35-44.
Siegle, G.J., Thompson, W., Carter, C.S., Steinhauer, S.R., Thase, M.E., 2007. Increased
N400 in Depression 17
amygdala and decreased dorsolateral prefrontal BOLD responses in unipolar
depression: related and independent features. Biol. Psychiatry 61, 198-209.
Sitnikova, T., Salisbury, D.F., Kuperberg, G., Holcomb, P.J., 2002. Electrophysiological
insights into language processing in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 39, 851-860.
Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B.W., Gibbon, M., First. M.B.,1990. Structured clinical interview for the
DSM-III-R patient edn (SCID-P, Version 1.0). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric
Press, Inc.
Strandburg, R.J., Marsh, J.T., Brown, W.S., Asarnow, R.F., Guthrie, D., Harper, R., 1997.
Event-related potential correlates of linguistic information processing in schizophrenics.
Biol. Psychiatry 42, 596-608.
Surguladze, S.A., Young, A.W., Senior, C., Brebion, G., Travis, M.J., Phillips, M.L., 2004.
Recognition accuracy and response bias to happy and sad facial expressions in patients
with major depression. Neuropsychology 18, 212-218.
Suslow, T., Roestel, C., Arolt, V., 2003. Affective priming in schizophrenia with and without
affective negative symptoms. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 253, 292-300.
Tandon, R., Keshavan, M.S., Nasrallah, H.A. 2008. Schizophrenia, “just the facts” what we
know in 2008. 2. Epidemiology and etiology. Schizophr. Res. 102, 1-18.
Weisbrod, M., Trage, J., Hill, H., Sattler, H.D., Maier, S., Kiefer, M., Grothe, J., Spitzer, M.,
1999. Emotional priming in depressed patients. Ger. J. Psychiatr. 2, 19-47.
Yoon, K.L., Joormann, J., Gotlib, I.H., 2009. Judging the intensity of facial expressions of
emotion: depression-related biases in the processing of positive affect. J. Abnorm.
Psychol. 118, 223-228.
N400 in Depression 18
Table 1
Means and Standard Deviations in Parentheses for Participant Characteristics
______________________________________________________________ _______ Study 1 N Medication Age Education Female MDD 17 70.6% 35.1 (9.7) 14.12 (2.0) 57.1% Controls 12 0% 31.7 (12.9) 14.75(1.5) 36.4% Study 2 Schizophrenia 7 100% 33.2 (9.0) 11.00 (.71)* 14.3%* MDD 12 100% 31.0 (9.2) 14.29 (2.0) 75.0% Controls 14 0% 44.7 (15.5) 15.75 (1.5) 57.1% Study 3 MDD 18 27.8% 40.3 (13.1) 14.50 (2.7) 50.0% Dysthymia 14 14.3% 42.7 (13.4) 15.38 (2.1) 71.4% Controls 19 0 % 36.8 (14.6) 16.07 (2.0) 52.6%
______________________________________________________________ _______
*Significantly different from major depressive disorder, dysthymia, and healthy control groups
(p<.05).
N400 in Depression 19
Table 2. ANOVA Results Within Study and Meta-Analysis Results ____________________________________________________________________________ a. Group main effects ____________________________________________________________________________ Study Groups d.f. F p ____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Control, MDD 1, 27 .23 .64 2 Control, MDD 1, 24 1.97 .17 2 Control, MDD, Schizophrenia 2, 30 1.90 .17 3 Control, MDD 1, 35 .22 .64 3 Control, MDD, Dysthymia 2, 48 .33 .72 b. Valence main effects ____________________________________________________________________________ Study Groups d.f. F p ____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Control, MDD 2, 54 .10 .91 2 Control, MDD 2, 48 1.05 .36 2 Control, MDD, Schizophrenia 2, 60 4.74 .03 3 Control, MDD 2, 70 1.37 .26 3 Control, MDD, Dysthymia 2, 96 .81 .45 c. Group x valence interaction ____________________________________________________________________________ Study Groups d.f. F p ____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Control, MDD 2, 54 1.41 .25 2 Control, MDD 2, 48 2.50 .09 2 Control, MDD, Schizophrenia 4, 60 5.03 .01 3 Control, MDD 2, 70 .13 .87 3 Control, MDD, Dysthymia 4, 96 .28 .89 ____________________________________________________________________________
Stouffer Meta-Analytic Values and Standard Deviations in Parentheses
___________________________________________________________________________ Major Depression Dysthymia Schizophrenia Controls Negative words 0.08 (1.34) 0.36 (1.53) -1.72 (3.52) 0.04 (1.44) Positive words -0.01 (1.32) 0.23 (1.13) 0.92 (3.61) -0.15 (1.54) Neutral words 0.14 (1.40) 0.02 (1.35) -1.04 (3.22) 0.09 (1.39) Note: Value = 1.95 is statistically significant at 90% level.
N400 in Depression 20
Table 3 N400 means (and standard deviations) by group and study ____________________________________________________________________________
N400 Means and Standard Deviations in Parentheses
____________________________________________________________________________ Study 1 Major Depression Dysthymia Schizophrenia Controls Negative Words 2.58 (1.84) n/a n/a 2.69 (3.55) Positive Words 3.12 (2.22) n/a n/a 1.91 (4.53) Neutral Words 2.63 (2.92) n/a n/a 2.30 (2.48) Study 2 Negative Words 2.34 (1.71) n/a -6.80 (1.68) 2.98 (1.60) Positive Words 1.28 (2.05) n/a 5.34 (1.03) 3.09 (1.90) Neutral Words 2.41 (2.71) n/a -2.30 (1.10) 2.73 (1.64) Study 3 Negative Words 2.07 (3.23) 2.55 (2.71) n/a 1.58 (2.30) Positive Words 1.98 (2.70) 2.28 (1.84) n/a 1.52 (2.31) Neutral Words 2.42 (2.42) 2.38 (2.36) n/a 2.31 (2.97) ____________________________________________________________________________
N400 in Depression 21 Figure 1. Grand-average waveforms from Pz for Study 1, 2, and 3. Y axis is in microvolts. X axis is in milliseconds. Waveforms include a 200 pre-stimulus baseline subtraction. Zero is onset of the terminal, emotional word.