![Page 1: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool
Piljae Im
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
1
![Page 2: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Webinar Outline
• Introduction• HUD CHP Level 1 Screening Tool• MF CHP Level 2 Analysis Tool• Quick Starts• MF Building Template• Example Use of the Tool
2
![Page 3: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction: Background• Promoting the use of combined heat and power (CHP) (cogeneration) in
multifamily housing is an initiative of the HUD Energy Action Plan.
• To help implement it, beginning in 2003 the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Department of Energy/Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE/ORNL), executed Interagency Agreements (IAA) to create feasibility screening software (i.e., Level 1 Screening Tool).
• ORNL created, expanded, and validated a Level 1 preliminary screening tool that enables the owners of multifamily housing to consider the feasibility (cost, savings and paybacks) for installing CHP.
• In May 2010 ORNL created for HUD a Level 2 Multifamily CHP Screening Tool (MFCHP) that adapts the BCHP tool used for the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) for use on multifamily buildings.
3
![Page 4: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Before the Level 2 Tool
HUD CHP Level 1 Screening Tool• Level 1 screening tool: Simplified process to
get a “go/no-go” answer as to whether or not a building owner or operator should look more carefully into CHP and perhaps enlist some engineering support in conducting a site inspection and conducting a rigorous economic analysis (i.e., Level 2 analysis).
• This tool is “non-technical” and is directed specifically toward building owners and operators.
• Users of the HUD CHP Screening Tool need to type in data from their monthly power and fuel bills for one consecutive 12 month period as well as some utility rate information.
4
![Page 5: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Before the Level 2 Tool
HUD CHP Level 1 Screening Tool• The program uses these data to estimate fuel use for space and water
heating and power consumption for air conditioning. The utility costs and rate information are combined with correlations for costs of generator equipment, installation, and maintenance to estimate simple payback periods for a hypothetical CHP system relative to the non-CHP system reflected in the utility data.
• Sites with low estimated simple payback periods are encouraged to look more seriously into CHP for both its energy savings and cost savings opportunities. Sites with high simple payback periods can save the time and effort of examining CHP in detail with assurances that they are not missing a great opportunity.
5
![Page 6: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Needs for the Level 2 Tool• Once the building owner decided to go for further analysis for CHP
systems after level 1 analysis, a more detailed level 2 analysis will be needed.
• A Level 2 analysis is based on detailed site examination, utility usage and heat consumption, and it can cost $5,000-10,000 in engineering firm charges.
• To provide a Level 2 tool for owners and for analysts that can facilitate the efforts
• The MF CHP Level 2 Analysis Tool provides a building energy simulation with a full hourly level analysis and cost analysis via simple easy-to-use user interfaces.
• This new tool provides a “public” option where anyone can have all the information on how it works (can compare results across practitioners more easily, and public entities like HUD can require more public results be provided on proposed projects). 6
![Page 7: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MF CHP Level 2 Analysis Tool• The MF CHP Level 2 Analysis Tool was developed under a
collaborative effort between the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Energy/Oak Ridge National Laboratory as a tool to evaluate the combined cooling, heating and power in multifamily housing.
• The MF CHP Level 2 Analysis Tool is a computer program for assessing the economic potential of combined cooling, heating, and power (CHP) systems for multifamily buildings.
• The original program, the BCHP Screening Tool, which is the similar program for commercial buildings (but no MF building type), was developed under Department of Energy funding by a collaborative effort between GARD Analytics of Park Ridge, Illinois and Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
7
![Page 8: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
MF CHP Level 2 Analysis Tool• The MF CHP Level 2 Analysis Tool is structured to perform parametric
analyses between a baseline building, typically a conventional building without a CHP system, and up to 25 alternative scenarios with varying selections for building mechanical systems and operating schedules.
• The MF CHP Level 2 Analysis Tool consists of the executable program, databases for HVAC equipment, electric generators, thermal storage systems, prototypical multifamily buildings, and climate data. The program also includes DOE-2.1e to calculate heating, cooling, and electrical loads.
8
![Page 9: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MF CHP Level 2 Analysis Tool
9
Input through the MF CHP Tool
Input through the MF CHP Tool
DRM TemplateDRM Template
DOE-2 BDL File (DOE-2 Input File)DOE-2 BDL File (DOE-2 Input File)
DOE-2 Run for System Sizing
DOE-2 Run for System Sizing
Output for System Sizing
Output for System Sizing
DOE-2 Simulation Run
DOE-2 Simulation Run
DOE-2 Simulation Output
DOE-2 Simulation Output
Output in the MF CHP Tool
Output in the MF CHP Tool
![Page 10: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Quick Starts• The tool and User Manual can be downloaded:
http://eber.ed.ornl.gov/MF_CHP/
• Installation procedure: See the user manual
10
![Page 11: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Quick Starts
11
Input
Results
Help
Scenario A:Base Case
Scenario B:Alternative
![Page 12: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Quick Starts
12
Table tab: Input and
Result
Graph tab: Result
Schematic tab:Result
Building Description:
Result
![Page 13: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Add a Scenario
13
Insert a column (three options)
![Page 14: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Add a Scenario: Copy of Current Column
14
Scenario C added
![Page 15: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Three Types of Input Method• Direct input
• Drop down menu
• Selection from a separate window
15
![Page 16: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Drop Down Menu (ex: Story Height)
16
![Page 17: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Drop Down Menu (ex: Story Height)
17
![Page 18: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Select from a Separate Window (ex: Location)
18
![Page 19: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Select from a Separate Window (ex: Location)
19
![Page 20: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Inputs: Table Tab
– Two categories for the inputs: Mandatory & Additional Inputs
– For a quick run, only the mandatory inputs needs to be entered
– For more detailed controls, the additional inputs needs to be entered.
20
![Page 21: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Mandatory Inputs
21
![Page 22: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Overview of the BCHP Screening ToolResult
– Annual Gas and Electricity Consumption & Costs
– Equipment Sizes & Costs– System Life Cycle Costs– Parametric Analysis of Up to 26
Systems– Simple Payback Relative To
Baseline System– Hourly Load Profiles for Selected
Dates
Building Loads: Dec-15
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
12:00 AM 6:00 AM 12:00 PM 6:00 PM 12:00 AM
Time
Lo
ad (
Btu
/ h
)0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Ele
ctri
city
Dem
and
(kW
)
Cooling Load
Heating Load
Electrical Load
22
![Page 23: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results: Table Tab
23
![Page 24: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Graph Tab– The graphs, also called charts, can be monthly results or
annual results from the simulation
– The numbers shown on the graph are taken from the grid on the Table tab.
24
![Page 25: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Graph Tab
25
![Page 26: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Schematic Tab– Provide a good summary of the energy (elec. and gas)
flow based on the selected case.
– Provide the summary of calculated project cost, operating cost, annual savings and simple payback.
26
![Page 27: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Schematic Tab
27
![Page 28: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Building Description
28
![Page 29: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Overview of the BCHP Screening ToolMF Building Template
– Thermal Model: Does not need to be the same with the actual building shape
– Six zones– Perimeter zone and core zone
for each zone– Two space types: Corner
apartment and Inside apartment
Zone Space Type Building
Fraction (%)
Window/Wall Ratio (%)
North East Corner Apartments
5 21
North Central Inside Apartments
40 23
North West Corner Apartments
5 21
South East Corner Apartments
5 21
South Central Inside Apartments
40 23
South West Corner Apartments
5 2129
![Page 30: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Overview of the BCHP Screening Tool
MF Building Defaults– Default values for the “thermal characteristics” of each type of zone
end use Six zones
– Resources:1) ASHRAE Standard 90.1 - 2004, 2) ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, 3) "Estimating Water Heating and Aggregate Electricity Loads in Multifamily Buildings," R. L.
Ritschard, Y. J. Huang, J. M. Fay, ASHRAE Transactions 1990, Volume 96, Pt. 1, pp. 796-8024) “Impact Evaluation of the Energy Retrofits Installed in the Margolis High-Rise Apartment Building,
Chelsea Housing Authority” M.M. Abraham, H.A. McLain. And J.M. MacDonald, Technical report ORNL/CON-413, 1995.
5) and professional judgment.
Use Area/Person (sqft/person)
Lighting (W/sqft)
Plug Load (W/sqft)
Person Heat Gain (Btuh/person)
Sensible Person Heat (Btuh/person)
High Rise Multifamily Housing 424 0.8 1 500 250
Use Heat Set Point (F)
Cool Set Point (F)
Max Humidity (%RH)
Min Humidity (%RH)
Ouside air (CFM/person)
High Rise Multifamily Housing
70 75 100 0 15
30
![Page 31: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Example: CHP Analysis Study
• Multifamily Building• New Bedford, MA• 7 story• 99 one-bedroom apartments• 82,900 sq.ft. heated floor space• No cooling system• Utility rate
– Average electricity: $0.123/kWh
– Average natural gas: $1.45/Therm31
![Page 32: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Monthly Utility Bills (Before CHP System)
Month Elec. N.G.
kWh $ Therm $
January 43,680 $4,805 3,822 $5,557
February 43,520 $4,787 7,976 $11,597
March 39,200 $4,900 5,600 $8,142
April 42,080 $5,260 3,959 $5,756
May 39,680 $4,960 2,904 $4,222
June 43,680 $5,460 1,646 $2,393
July 47,360 $5,920 964 $1,401
August 56,160 $7,020 674 $979
September 54,240 $6,780 771 $1,121
October 46,240 $5,780 1,202 $1,747
November 44,160 $5,520 2,232 $3,245
December 39,360 $4,920 5,314 $7,726
Total 539,360 $66,112 37,064 $53,886
Average Cost $0.12 $1.45
32
![Page 33: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Preliminary Screening (Level 1)
33
![Page 34: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Preliminary Screening (Level 1)
34
![Page 35: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Preliminary Screening (Level 1)
35
![Page 36: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Preliminary Screening (Level 1)
36
![Page 37: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Preliminary Screening (Level 1)
37
![Page 38: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Example: Level 2 Analysis - Procedure
• Base case: Initial Run (As-built)• Base case: Calibration• Apply generator(s) for the base case building• Change the generator options• Find the optimal scenario
38
![Page 39: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Example: Level 2 Analysis
• Base case: Initial Run – At least complete the Mandatory Inputs
– Use available data/information
– Use the best guess for unknown data/or
– Leave default values
39
![Page 40: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Building Size
HVAC (No cooling)
Average Utility Rate
40
Building Location
![Page 41: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Result Screen (Annual Consumption)1.Total Annual Elec. Use Simulated vs. Utility Bills: 524,379 kWh vs.539,360 kWh (2.8% diff.) 2. Total Annual N.G. Simulated vs. Utility Bills: 59,175 Therms vs. 37,064 Therms (59.7 % diff.)
Annual Elec. Use
Annual N.G. Use
41
![Page 42: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Month Elec. N.G.
kWh $ Therm $
January 43,680 $4,805 3,822 $5,557
February 43,520 $4,787 7,976 $11,597
March 39,200 $4,900 5,600 $8,142
April 42,080 $5,260 3,959 $5,756
May 39,680 $4,960 2,904 $4,222
June 43,680 $5,460 1,646 $2,393
July 47,360 $5,920 964 $1,401
August 56,160 $7,020 674 $979
September 54,240 $6,780 771 $1,121
October 46,240 $5,780 1,202 $1,747
November 44,160 $5,520 2,232 $3,245
December 39,360 $4,920 5,314 $7,726
Total 539,360 $66,112 37,064 $53,886
Average Cost $0.12 $1.45
Monthly Elec. Use
Monthly N.G. Use
Utility Bills
42
![Page 43: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
• Discrepancy between the initial simulation and Utility Bills– Default assumption (average MF characteristics) vs.
actual building characteristics
– Unknown input parameters (e.g., windows-to-wall ratio, boiler & chiller size, operation schedule, etc.)
– Equipment performance data
– Actual weather vs. typical weather file
Need Calibration !
43
![Page 44: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
• Base Case: Calibration with Utility Bills/Measure data– Tune the initial simulation to be matched with the utility
bills (i.e., actual use)
– Annual total
– Monthly total
– Useful input parameters for calibration• SHW use (Btu/h-person)
• Infiltration rate (ACH)
• Lighting and Equipment load (W/sq.ft)
• Building insulation value (R-value)
• Type of windows (if unknown)
• Cooling/Heating room set temperatures
• Others 44
![Page 45: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
• Input Changed
1.Too low heating energy : Change air infiltration rate from 0.5 to 0.752.Too high SWH use: Change service water heating density (Btu/h-person) from 2500 to 500
45
![Page 46: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Result Screen (Annual Consumption)
1.Total Annual Elec. Use Simulated vs. Utility Bills:526,320 kWh vs.539,360 kWh 2. Total Annual N.G. Simulated vs. Utility Bills:36,137 Therms vs. 37,064 Therms (2.5% diff.)
46
![Page 47: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Add a Generator– The MF building has a 75 kW reciprocating engine.
– Change the corresponding default values to be the same with the base case scenario
47
![Page 48: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Add a Generator– The MF building has a 75 kW reciprocating engine.
– Change the corresponding default values to be the same with the base case scenario
– Select a reciprocating engine (5.f. Generator)
48
![Page 49: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Add a Generator – The MF building has a 75 kW reciprocating engine.
– Change the corresponding default values to be the same with the base case scenario
– Select a reciprocating engine (5.f. Generator)
– Input 75 kW (6.c. Generator Sizing (direct input))
49
![Page 50: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Add a Generator– The MF building has a 75 kW reciprocating engine.
– Change the corresponding default values to be the same with the base case scenario
– Select a reciprocating engine (5.f. Generator)
– Input 75 kW (6.c. Generator Sizing (direct input))
– Check with III.2. Generator Operation : Thermal demand Option for summer and winter
50
![Page 51: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Check Result
No Changes in Elec. Use
Reduced Space Heating
Reduced SWH
N.G Use for Generator
Total N.G. Use
Elec. Onsite Generation51
![Page 52: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Select Schematic tab
52
![Page 53: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Select Case B
53
![Page 54: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Cost AnalysisSystem Configuration
Space and SW Heating
Heat Recovery Summary
54
![Page 55: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Double Click
55
![Page 56: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
![Page 57: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Click
57
![Page 58: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
![Page 59: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Double Click
59
![Page 60: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
![Page 61: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Next Step: Analyze and find the optimal generator
and the schedule for the building
Input parameters can be changed for the analysis– Size of generator
• 30, 45, 70, 100 kW…
– Number of generators
– Type of generator • Reciprocating, Gas turbine, Micro turbine
– Generator operating option• Thermal demand
• Electric demand
• Greater/lesser demand
• Maximum output
– Heat used for space heating/service water heating61
![Page 62: Multifamily (MF) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Level 2 Analysis Tool Piljae Im Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551729a5550346f5558b5b55/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Thanks!
Question/feedback/comment
Piljae Im
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
865-241-2312
62