MOTIVATING RELUCTANT LEARNERS ENGAGING STUDENTS FOR ACADEMIC SUCCESS
Eric Toshalis, Graduate School of Education and Counseling, Lewis & Clark College Michael J. Nakkula, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania Moderated by Christopher Tate, Education Specialist, U.S. Department of Education September 12, 2013
1
2
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
ABOUT THE PRESENTERS
Michael J. Nakkula Prac(ce Professor and Department Chair University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Educa(on
Eric Toshalis Assistant Professor and Director of the Summer ML/HS MAT Program Lewis and Clark College Graduate School of Educa(on and Counseling
3
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• Introduction • Motivation • Engagement • Student Voice & Choice
OVERVIEW
INTRODUCTION
4
5
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• They don’t feel okay. • They have a history of failure.
WHY MIGHT STUDENTS BE RELUCTANT TO LEARN?
6
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• They don’t feel okay. • They have a history of failure. • They don’t feel known or included. • The topic doesn’t interest them.
WHY MIGHT STUDENTS BE RELUCTANT TO LEARN?
7
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• They don’t feel okay. • They have a history of failure. • They don’t feel known or included. • The topic doesn’t interest them. • They are distracted. • They don’t want to look dumb.
WHY MIGHT STUDENTS BE RELUCTANT TO LEARN?
8
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• They don’t feel okay. • They have a history of failure. • They don’t feel known or included. • The topic doesn’t interest them. • They are distracted. • They don’t want to look dumb. • The activity is too easy or too difficult. • They don’t see how success is possible.
WHY MIGHT STUDENTS BE RELUCTANT TO LEARN?
9
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• They don’t feel okay. • They have a history of failure. • They don’t feel known or included. • The topic doesn’t interest them. • They are distracted. • They don’t want to look dumb. • The activity is too easy or too difficult. • They don’t see how success is possible. • They had no choice in the matter.
WHY MIGHT STUDENTS BE RELUCTANT TO LEARN?
10
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• Unmotivated • Disengaged • “Don’t care about learning” • Defiant • Oppositional • Lazy • Checked out • Failure
OUR (MIS)PERCEPTIONS ABOUT RELUCTANT LEARNERS SOMETIMES PRODUCE LABELS LIKE:
11
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• Unmotivated • Disengaged • “Don’t care about learning” • Defiant • Oppositional • Lazy • Checked out • Failure
OUR (MIS)PERCEPTIONS ABOUT RELUCTANT LEARNERS SOMETIMES PRODUCE LABELS LIKE:
Such labels have important implica:ons for how educators and ins:tu:ons view reluctant students,
what opportuni:es are provided for them, and how such students learn to view themselves.
12
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• Motivation is crucial for learning. ü Attitudes, aspirations, and desires drive decision making.
WHAT RESEARCH TELLS US
13
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• Motivation is crucial for learning. ü Attitudes, aspirations, and desires drive decision making.
• Engagement is necessary for achievement. ü Actions make things happen.
WHAT RESEARCH TELLS US
14
10,500,000
15,600,000 16,200,000
• Motivation is crucial for learning. ü Attitudes, aspirations, and desires drive decision making.
• Engagement is necessary for achievement. ü Actions make things happen.
• Student voice promotes motivation and engagement. ü Students test ideas and they connect with and distinguish
themselves from others through what they say and choose.
WHAT RESEARCH TELLS US
Voice
Action Focus
Expression Identity
Agency Independence
Influence
Desire Attitude
Engagement
KEY FACTORS IN POWERFUL LEARNING
Motivation
15
MOTIVATION
16
To get motivated, learners often read their situation by consciously or unconsciously posing a series of internal questions, the answers to which determine how much energy they will devote to a task:
MOTIVATION: AN INTERNAL THOUGHT PROCESS
17
To get motivated, learners often read their situation by consciously or unconsciously posing a series of internal questions, the answers to which determine how much energy they will devote to a task: ü Am I smart enough to do this? (mindset)
MOTIVATION: AN INTERNAL THOUGHT PROCESS
18
To get motivated, learners often read their situation by consciously or unconsciously posing a series of internal questions, the answers to which determine how much energy they will devote to a task: ü Am I smart enough to do this? (mindset) ü Is it important to me? (intrinsic motivation)
MOTIVATION: AN INTERNAL THOUGHT PROCESS
19
To get motivated, learners often read their situation by consciously or unconsciously posing a series of internal questions, the answers to which determine how much energy they will devote to a task: ü Am I smart enough to do this? (mindset) ü Is it important to me? (intrinsic motivation) ü Am I capable of doing it? (skill development, competence)
MOTIVATION: AN INTERNAL THOUGHT PROCESS
20
To get motivated, learners often read their situation by consciously or unconsciously posing a series of internal questions, the answers to which determine how much energy they will devote to a task: ü Am I smart enough to do this? (mindset) ü Is it important to me? (intrinsic motivation) ü Am I capable of doing it? (skill development, competence) ü Will my relationships improve if I do it? (relatedness, connectedness)
MOTIVATION: AN INTERNAL THOUGHT PROCESS
21
To get motivated, learners often read their situation by consciously or unconsciously posing a series of internal questions, the answers to which determine how much energy they will devote to a task: ü Am I smart enough to do this? (mindset) ü Is it important to me? (intrinsic motivation) ü Am I capable of doing it? (skill development, competence) ü Will my relationships improve if I do it? (relatedness, connectedness) ü Who is in control of it? (agency, autonomy)
MOTIVATION: AN INTERNAL THOUGHT PROCESS
22
To get motivated, learners often read their situation by consciously or unconsciously posing a series of internal questions, the answers to which determine how much energy they will devote to a task: ü Am I smart enough to do this? (mindset) ü Is it important to me? (intrinsic motivation) ü Am I capable of doing it? (skill development, competence) ü Will my relationships improve if I do it? (relatedness, connectedness) ü Who is in control of it? (agency, autonomy) ü What will I get out of it? (expectancy-value, future aspirations)
MOTIVATION: AN INTERNAL THOUGHT PROCESS
23
To get motivated, learners often read their situation by consciously or unconsciously posing a series of internal questions, the answers to which determine how much energy they will devote to a task: ü Am I smart enough to do this? (mindset) ü Is it important to me? (intrinsic motivation) ü Am I capable of doing it? (skill development, competence) ü Will my relationships improve if I do it? (relatedness, connectedness) ü Who is in control of it? (agency, autonomy) ü What will I get out of it? (expectancy-value, future aspirations) ü What are the chances I will succeed? (expectancy-value)
MOTIVATION: AN INTERNAL THOUGHT PROCESS
24
To get motivated, learners often read their situation by consciously or unconsciously posing a series of internal questions, the answers to which determine how much energy they will devote to a task: ü Am I smart enough to do this? (mindset) ü Is it important to me? (intrinsic motivation) ü Am I capable of doing it? (skill development, competence) ü Will my relationships improve if I do it? (relatedness, connectedness) ü Who is in control of it? (agency, autonomy) ü What will I get out of it? (expectancy-value, future aspirations) ü What are the chances I will succeed? (expectancy-value) ü What will others think of me when I do it? (social climate)
MOTIVATION: AN INTERNAL THOUGHT PROCESS
25
• Why should I try? The relationship between “care” and effort.
MINDSET MATTERS: DRAWING ON THE WORK OF CAROL DWECK
26
• Why should I try? The relationship between “care” and effort. – The basic belief structure:
• I’m good/not good at that because of my innate talent or who I am. • I try/don’t try hard because I know what I’m good at and what I’m not.
MINDSET MATTERS: DRAWING ON THE WORK OF CAROL DWECK
27
• Why should I try? The relationship between “care” and effort. – The basic belief structure:
• I’m good/not good at that because of my innate talent or who I am. • I try/don’t try hard because I know what I’m good at and what I’m not.
– The mediated belief structure (we try when we care): • I try hard at this because I care about it, because I’m interested. • I don’t try, even though I know I can succeed, because I don’t care.
MINDSET MATTERS: DRAWING ON THE WORK OF CAROL DWECK
28
• Why should I try? The relationship between “care” and effort. – The basic belief structure:
• I’m good/not good at that because of my innate talent or who I am. • I try/don’t try hard because I know what I’m good at and what I’m not.
– The mediated belief structure (we try when we care): • I try hard at this because I care about it, because I’m interested. • I don’t try, even though I know I can succeed, because I don’t care.
– The relationally mediated belief structure (we care when others care about us and our performance) • I’m interested and capable of learning because I know others care
about me and my learning. • I’m not interested because I don’t believe others care about or believe
in me.
MINDSET MATTERS: DRAWING ON THE WORK OF CAROL DWECK
29
• Expectancy-value theory & intrinsic motivators – Students carry their history of success, failure, and relational
returns to each new academic challenge. Some are reluctant because they have few positive experiences to draw from.
– Reluctance to engage can arise from a careful and rational risk assessment (i.e., Why try when I will likely fail or when the work doesn’t matter to me?).
– To be motivated to participate in academic work, students must value the activity itself and believe that its result will be of some worth to them.
– The strongest motivators are those that are internally derived.
LEARNERS HAVE TO VALUE IT TO WANT TO DO IT
Source: Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153. 30
• Expectancy-value theory & intrinsic motivators – Students carry their history of success, failure, and relational
returns to each new academic challenge. Some are reluctant because they have few positive experiences to draw from.
– Reluctance to engage can arise from a careful and rational risk assessment (i.e., Why try when I will likely fail or when the work doesn’t matter to me?).
– To be motivated to participate in academic work, students must value the activity itself and believe that its result will be of some worth to them.
– The strongest motivators are those that are internally derived.
LEARNERS HAVE TO VALUE IT TO WANT TO DO IT
Pre-learning activities, “little wins” along the way, regular encouragement and recognition (not empty praise), and
appeals to the students’ own interests and goals can help a lot. Source: Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153. 31
ENGAGEMENT
32
Before engaging academic activities, learners often wrestle with internal questions such as:
ü Is the social context safe for me to take a risk? (pathways, avoidance behaviors, resistance, relationships)
ü Will this help me reach my goals? (sense of purpose, future aspirations)
ü What will happen when I ask for assistance? (help-seeking) ü What skills should I use to sustain focus? (self-regulation) ü Wait, what are we doing again? (distractions, multitasking)
ENGAGEMENT: THE DECISION TO DEVOTE ATTENTION AND ACT
33
Before engaging academic activities, learners often wrestle with internal questions such as: ü Is the social context safe for me to take a risk? (pathways,
avoidance behaviors, resistance, relationships)
ü Will this help me reach my goals? (sense of purpose, future aspirations)
ü What will happen when I ask for assistance? (help-seeking) ü What skills should I use to sustain focus? (self-regulation) ü Wait, what are we doing again? (distractions, multitasking)
ENGAGEMENT: THE DECISION TO DEVOTE ATTENTION AND ACT
34
Before engaging academic activities, learners often wrestle with internal questions such as: ü Is the social context safe for me to take a risk? (pathways,
avoidance behaviors, resistance, relationships) ü Will this help me reach my goals? (sense of purpose, future
aspirations)
ü What will happen when I ask for assistance? (help-seeking)
ü What skills should I use to sustain focus? (self-regulation) ü Wait, what are we doing again? (distractions, multitasking)
ENGAGEMENT: THE DECISION TO DEVOTE ATTENTION AND ACT
35
Before engaging academic activities, learners often wrestle with internal questions such as: ü Is the social context safe for me to take a risk? (pathways,
avoidance behaviors, resistance, relationships) ü Will this help me reach my goals? (sense of purpose, future
aspirations) ü What will happen when I ask for assistance? (help-seeking)
ü What skills should I use to sustain focus? (self-regulation)
ü Wait, what are we doing again? (distractions, multitasking)
ENGAGEMENT: THE DECISION TO DEVOTE ATTENTION AND ACT
36
Before engaging academic activities, learners often wrestle with internal questions such as: ü Is the social context safe for me to take a risk? (pathways,
avoidance behaviors, resistance, relationships) ü Will this help me reach my goals? (sense of purpose, future
aspirations) ü What will happen when I ask for assistance? (help-seeking) ü What skills should I use to sustain focus? (self-regulation)
ü Wait, what are we doing again? (distractions, multitasking)
ENGAGEMENT: THE DECISION TO DEVOTE ATTENTION AND ACT
37
Before engaging academic activities, learners often wrestle with internal questions such as: ü Is the social context safe for me to take a risk? (pathways,
avoidance behaviors, resistance, relationships) ü Will this help me reach my goals? (sense of purpose, future
aspirations) ü What will happen when I ask for assistance? (help-seeking) ü What skills should I use to sustain focus? (self-regulation) ü Wait, what are we doing again? (distractions, multitasking)
ENGAGEMENT: THE DECISION TO DEVOTE ATTENTION AND ACT
For these reasons, engagement is as much about emotion and relationship as it is about cognition and attitude.
38
• Do students move from motivation to engagement, or from engagement to motivation?
• Students take various social, intellectual, cultural, and psychological
pathways to learning. These diverse pathways influence how each individual student arrives at the task.
• We misunderstand “reluctant learners” when we fail to account for their journey and their context, when we ignore “where they’re at.”
THE CHICKEN & EGG OF MOTIVATION & ENGAGEMENT
39
• Do students move from motivation to engagement, or from engagement to motivation? — The answer: Yes!
• Students take various social, intellectual, cultural, and psychological pathways to learning. These diverse pathways influence how each individual student arrives at the task.
• We misunderstand “reluctant learners” when we fail to account for their journey and their context, when we ignore “where they’re at.”
THE CHICKEN & EGG OF MOTIVATION & ENGAGEMENT
40
• Do students move from motivation to engagement, or from engagement to motivation? — The answer: Yes!
• Students take various social, intellectual, cultural, and psychological pathways to learning. These diverse pathways influence how each individual student arrives at the task. — Some need to get motivated before they’ll engage. — Others need to be engaged before they will generate motivation.
• We misunderstand “reluctant learners” when we fail to account for their journey and their context, when we ignore “where they’re at.”
THE CHICKEN & EGG OF MOTIVATION & ENGAGEMENT
41
• Do students move from motivation to engagement, or from engagement to motivation? — The answer: Yes!
• Students take various social, intellectual, cultural, and psychological pathways to learning. These diverse pathways influence how each individual student arrives at the task. — Some need to get motivated before they’ll engage. — Others need to be engaged before they will generate motivation.
• We misunderstand “reluctant learners” when we fail to account for their journey and their context, when we ignore “where they’re at.”
THE CHICKEN & EGG OF MOTIVATION & ENGAGEMENT
Solution for the classroom: Get to know your students!
42
• Engagement and motivation are overlapping and integrated in the learner’s mind (and in the research)
• Self-Determination Theory – Competence: learners need to feel “up to the task,” capable, and
skilled – Relatedness: learners need to feel positively connected to peers
and adults – Autonomy: learners need opportunities for independent decision
making and action • When these three elements are present, a student’s reluctance to
engage will likely diminish.
PARSING THE DESIRE TO ENGAGE
Source: Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68. 43
• Engagement and motivation are overlapping and integrated in the learner’s mind (and in the research)
• Self-Determination Theory – Competence: learners need to feel “up to the task,” capable, and
skilled – Relatedness: learners need to feel positively connected to peers
and adults – Autonomy: learners need opportunities for independent decision
making and action • When these three elements are present, a student’s reluctance to
engage will likely diminish.
PARSING THE DESIRE TO ENGAGE
Teachers can use this three-part theory as a quick formative assessment of the learner’s readiness to engage, and of the
classroom’s capacity to support that engagement. Source: Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation,
social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68. 44
• All learners tend to be reluctant to apply themselves in alienating or marginalizing situations.
• “Oppositional identities” are a myth. — Students of color, students from low-income settings, and English
learners value education at rates equal to or higher than White, middle class, native English speakers.
— Marginalized students are rarely if ever afraid of “acting White” by being academically successful.
— Rather, they often feel like they are unable to bring their full selves into culturally subtractive school settings so they sometimes disengage to preserve their sense of self-worth.
RELUCTANT LEARNERS ARE SOMETIMES RESISTANT
Source: Diamond, J. B. (2006). Are we barking up the wrong tree? Rethinking oppositional culture explanations for the Black/White achievement gap. The Achievement Gap Initiative at Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.agi.harvard.edu/Search/download.php?id=79. 45
• All learners tend to be reluctant to apply themselves in alienating or marginalizing situations.
• “Oppositional identities” are a myth. — Students of color, students from low-income settings, and English
learners value education at rates equal to or higher than White, middle class, native English speakers.
— Marginalized students are rarely if ever afraid of “acting White” by being academically successful.
— Rather, they often feel like they are unable to bring their full selves into culturally subtractive school settings so they sometimes disengage to preserve their sense of self-worth.
RELUCTANT LEARNERS ARE SOMETIMES RESISTANT
If alienating school experiences can push students to reject what or who they feel has rejected them, teachers can reverse student reluctance
simply by identifying and removing these alienating experiences. Students may be the experts here!
46
• Reluctant learners often need to develop specific skill sets that help them to start an activity and stay on task despite inevitable distractions.
• Like intelligence, the ability to manage distraction is something students develop over time.
• Trying something new, attempting something difficult, confronting a challenge—these things require focus, and focus requires practice. — Multitasking can impede higher cognitive functioning. — Extending time and creating quiet can help a great deal.
REGULATING THE SELF TO INITIATE AND SUSTAIN FOCUS
47
• Reluctant learners often need to develop specific skill sets that help them to start an activity and stay on task despite inevitable distractions.
• Like intelligence, the ability to manage distraction is something students develop over time.
• Trying something new, attempting something difficult, confronting a challenge—these things require focus, and focus requires practice. — Multitasking can impede higher cognitive functioning. — Extending time and creating quiet can help a great deal.
REGULATING THE SELF TO INITIATE AND SUSTAIN FOCUS
A learner’s focus comes from her/his ability to self-regulate, and because self-regulation is a skillset,
it can—and should!—be taught. 48
Forethought
Performance Control
Self-‐Reflec:on
• Goal seOng • Strategic planning • Self-‐efficacy
beliefs • Intrinsic interest
• ATen(on focusing • Self-‐instruc(on • Self-‐monitoring • Help reques(ng
• Self-‐evalua(on • ATribu(on • Self-‐reac(ons • Adap(vity
Source: Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
THE CYCLICAL PROCESS OF SELF-REGULATION
49
Forethought nonspecific distant goals, performance goal orienta(on, low
self-‐efficacy, disinterested
specific sequenced goals, learning goal orienta(on, high self-‐efficacy, intrinsically interested
Performance Control
unfocused plan, self-‐handicapping
strategies, outcome self-‐monitoring
focused on performance, self-‐instruc(on/imagery,
process self-‐monitoring
Self-‐Reflec:on
avoid self-‐evalua(on, ability aTribu(ons,
nega(ve self-‐reac(ons, non-‐
adap(ve
seek self-‐evalua(on, strategy/effort
aTribu(ons, posi(ve self-‐reac(ons,
adap(ve
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
NAÏVE ≠ DISENGAGED OR UNMOTIVATED
50 Source: Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
51
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
• For example, how might we interpret the following student responses?
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
52
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
• For example, how might we interpret the following student responses?
— “I just do what my teacher tells me.”
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
53
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
• For example, how might we interpret the following student responses?
— “I just do what my teacher tells me.” — “If I’m having difficulty motivating myself to complete my homework, I
just work harder.”
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
54
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
• For example, how might we interpret the following student responses?
— “I just do what my teacher tells me.” — “If I’m having difficulty motivating myself to complete my homework, I
just work harder.” — “I can multitask and still do fine.”
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
55
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
• For example, how might we interpret the following student responses?
— “I just do what my teacher tells me.” — “If I’m having difficulty motivating myself to complete my homework, I
just work harder.” — “I can multitask and still do fine.” — “I don’t feel like it.”
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
56
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
• For example, how might we interpret the following student responses?
— “I just do what my teacher tells me.” — “If I’m having difficulty motivating myself to complete my homework, I
just work harder.” — “I can multitask and still do fine.” — “I don’t feel like it.” — “This is stupid.”
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
57
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
• For example, how might we interpret the following student responses?
— “I just do what my teacher tells me.” — “If I’m having difficulty motivating myself to complete my homework, I
just work harder.” — “I can multitask and still do fine.” — “I don’t feel like it.” — “This is stupid.” — “I don’t understand.”
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
58
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
• For example, how might we interpret the following student responses?
— “I just do what my teacher tells me.” — “If I’m having difficulty motivating myself to complete my homework, I
just work harder.” — “I can multitask and still do fine.” — “I don’t feel like it.” — “This is stupid.” — “I don’t understand.” — “F[orget] you!”
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
59
• Problems in self-regulation may be misread as disengagement or a lack of motivation.
• For example, how might we interpret the following student responses?
— “I just do what my teacher tells me.” — “If I’m having difficulty motivating myself to complete my homework, I
just work harder.” — “I can multitask and still do fine.” — “I don’t feel like it.” — “This is stupid.” — “I don’t understand.” — “F[orget] you!”
LEARNING TO SEE PROBLEMS WITH STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATION
Sharing with students our own struggles and strategies to initiate and sustain attention can help them
normalize their own difficulties and improve their skills. 60
• To protect self-worth, students who are insecure about their ability to achieve may develop strategies that deflect attention from their capabilities and offer escapes from being labeled as stupid. — Competitive environments frequently exacerbate these trends.
RELUCTANCE TO ENGAGE MAY BE AVOIDANCE
61
Source: Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., & Kang, Y. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance behaviors in mathematics: A multi-method study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88-106.
• To protect self-worth, students who are insecure about their ability to achieve may develop strategies that deflect attention from their capabilities and offer escapes from being labeled as stupid. — Competitive environments frequently exacerbate these trends.
• Examples of avoidance behaviors include: — purposely dodging opportunities to seek help, — resisting new knowledge or novel approaches to academic work, — and purposefully withdrawing effort.
RELUCTANCE TO ENGAGE MAY BE AVOIDANCE
62
Source: Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., & Kang, Y. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance behaviors in mathematics: A multi-method study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88-106.
• To protect self-worth, students who are insecure about their ability to achieve may develop strategies that deflect attention from their capabilities and offer escapes from being labeled as stupid. — Competitive environments frequently exacerbate these trends.
• Examples of avoidance behaviors include: — purposely dodging opportunities to seek help, — resisting new knowledge or novel approaches to academic work, — and purposefully withdrawing effort.
• These avoidance strategies may protect students from negative judgments by others, but they are also likely to undermine performance.
RELUCTANCE TO ENGAGE MAY BE AVOIDANCE
63
Source: Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., & Kang, Y. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance behaviors in mathematics: A multi-method study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88-106.
• To protect self-worth, students who are insecure about their ability to achieve may develop strategies that deflect attention from their capabilities and offer escapes from being labeled as stupid. — Competitive environments frequently exacerbate these trends.
• Examples of avoidance behaviors include: — purposely dodging opportunities to seek help, — resisting new knowledge or novel approaches to academic work, — and purposefully withdrawing effort.
• These avoidance strategies may protect students from negative judgments by others, but they are also likely to undermine performance.
RELUCTANCE TO ENGAGE MAY BE AVOIDANCE
To reduce avoidance behaviors, educators should stress mastery more than performance as the primary goal of academic work.
64
Source: Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., & Kang, Y. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance behaviors in mathematics: A multi-method study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88-106.
• Students try to manage how they are perceived by others. – No one wants to look stupid! – Everyone wants to avoid failing publicly.
RELUCTANT LEARNERS MAY BE SELF-HANDICAPPING
65 Source: Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138.
• Students try to manage how they are perceived by others. – No one wants to look stupid! – Everyone wants to avoid failing publicly.
• If students believe that they are going to fail, they often create obstacles and excuses to justify their failures or to deflect others’ attention toward external circumstances rather than innate ability.
RELUCTANT LEARNERS MAY BE SELF-HANDICAPPING
66 Source: Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138.
• Students try to manage how they are perceived by others. – No one wants to look stupid! – Everyone wants to avoid failing publicly.
• If students believe that they are going to fail, they often create obstacles and excuses to justify their failures or to deflect others’ attention toward external circumstances rather than innate ability.
• These self-handicapping strategies include: – procrastinating or fooling around – getting involved in too many activities or becoming
over-involved with friends or romantic partners – illness, shyness, or moodiness – drug or alcohol use – lack of sleep
RELUCTANT LEARNERS MAY BE SELF-HANDICAPPING
67 Source: Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138.
• Students try to manage how they are perceived by others. – No one wants to look stupid! – Everyone wants to avoid failing publicly.
• If students believe that they are going to fail, they often create obstacles and excuses to justify their failures or to deflect others’ attention toward external circumstances rather than innate ability.
• These self-handicapping strategies include: – procrastinating or fooling around – getting involved in too many activities or becoming
over-involved with friends or romantic partners – illness, shyness, or moodiness – drug or alcohol use – lack of sleep
RELUCTANT LEARNERS MAY BE SELF-HANDICAPPING
Explicitly teaching students about these tendencies can help them identify problems and choose different behaviors for themselves.
68 Source: Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138.
VOICE & CHOICE
69
• Learners need venues for voice and opportunities for choice to fully invest in academic activity.
• To generate motivation and make the decision to engage, students want to know: — Do I get to say what I think? Will others listen? — Will I be allowed to choose what I do? Will that choice matter? — Are my contributions and critiques invited here? Will my ideas
be integrated into what we study and how we study it? — How much of what we do will I get to control? — Will I be able to influence what happens to me and to others? — Will I be able to claim a sense of ownership over the final
product? Will it be “mine”?
MOTIVATING AND ENGAGING RELUCTANT LEARNERS THROUGH VOICE AND CHOICE
70
THE SPECTRUM OF STUDENT VOICE ORIENTED ACTIVITY
24 Motivation, Engagement, and Student Voice: The Students at the Center Series
sources on the left side but are more often seen as
leaders of change on the right. The middle areas are
where activities blend these orientations in ways that
recognize students as stakeholders while providing
opportunities for them to collaborate with, but not
yet lead, adults to achieve specific goals. The headers
(e.g., expression, consultation) signify what students
do at each level. Moving from left to right, their voices
are more included, formalized, and empowered. This
corresponds to the shading on the bottom ramp
in which the expectations of adults and students
gradually transform depending on the position.
At the left side of the student voice spectrum,
students are provided with opportunities to express
themselves. Whether those opportunities involve
sharing opinions, creating art, performing theater,
signing petitions, or even publishing op-ed pieces in
the local paper, the point is that students are given
public outlets for their perspectives. When those
opportunities are not formalized and students’
perspectives are not incorporated in any substantive
way, these examples of student voice tend to be
expressions only. When students are asked for their
opinion or invited to provide feedback on some aspect
of their school or community, they are understood
to be functioning as consultants. When adults want
to know what youth think in order to inform later
decision making, they may use surveys, focus groups,
or informal conversations to gauge adolescents’
perspectives.
Consulted more than empowered, these are still
examples of student voice because they provide
youth with a chance to formally declare their opinions
about something in the hope they will be considered
FIGURE 3
THE SPECTRUM OF STUDENT VOICE ORIENTED ACTIVITY
Students articulating
their perspectivesStudents involved as stakeholders
Students directing
collective activities
Students as data
sources Students as collaboratorsStudents as leaders of
change
Expression Consultation Participation Partnership Activism Leadership
Volunteering
opinions, creating
art, celebrating,
complaining, praising,
objecting
Being asked for their
opinion, providing
feedback, serving
on a focus group,
completing a survey
Attending meetings
or events in which
decisions are made,
frequent inclusion
when issues are
framed and actions
planned
Formalized role in
decision making,
standard operations
require (not just
invite) student
involvement, adults
are trained in how to
work collaboratively
with youth partners
Identifying problems,
generating solutions,
organizing responses,
agitating and/or
educating for change
both in and outside of
school contexts
(Co-)Planning,
making decisions and
accepting significant
responsibility for
outcomes, (co-)
guiding group
processes, (co-)
conducting activities
Most student voice activity in schools/
classrooms resides at this end of the
spectrum.The need for adults to share authority, demonstrate
trust, protect against co-optation, learn from students,
and handle disagreement increases from left to right.
Students’ influence, responsibility, and decision-making
roles increase from left to right.
71 Source: Toshalis, E., & Nakkula, M. J. (2012). Motivation, engagement and student voice. Retrieved from http://www.studentsatthecenter.org/sites/scl.dl-dev.com/files/Motivation%20Engagement%20Student%20Voice_0.pdf
• Place-based learning • Project-based learning • Expeditionary learning • Inquiry-based instruction • Problem-posing pedagogies • Student-led parent-teacher conferences • Student-led class meetings • Participatory-action research • Student activism
EXAMPLES OF APPROACHES THAT PRIORITIZE STUDENT VOICE
72
• “Solve two of the following five problems.” • “Select one of these three essay test questions that you want to
answer.” • “Pick a topic you want to explore more deeply.”
EXAMPLES OF TEACHING TECHNIQUES THAT PRIORITIZE STUDENT CHOICE
73
• “Solve two of the following five problems.” • “Select one of these three essay test questions that you want to
answer.” • “Pick a topic you want to explore more deeply.” • “Decide which role you want to play in today’s group activity.” • “Select which assignments of yours most demonstrate your growth as
a learner in this class and prepare to share them with your parent(s) and me.”
EXAMPLES OF TEACHING TECHNIQUES THAT PRIORITIZE STUDENT CHOICE
74
• “Solve two of the following five problems.” • “Select one of these three essay test questions that you want to
answer.” • “Pick a topic you want to explore more deeply.” • “Decide which role you want to play in today’s group activity.” • “Select which assignments of yours most demonstrate your growth as
a learner in this class and prepare to share them with your parent(s) and me.”
• “For our next ‘free Friday,’ which topic do you most want to investigate as a group, and how would you like to investigate it?”
• “Looking at the clock, there are many good options here, each with its pros and cons. How do you think we should spend the next 20 minutes of class?”
EXAMPLES OF TEACHING TECHNIQUES THAT PRIORITIZE STUDENT CHOICE
75
Voice
Action Focus
Expression Identity
Agency Independence
Influence
Desire Attitude
Engagement
KEY FACTORS IN POWERFUL LEARNING
Motivation
76
• Co-construct safe(r) academic spaces that encourage inquiry, exploration, curiosity, creativity, connection, and risk-taking.
• Make mastery of content and skills (not performance and competition) the goal of academic work.
TAKEAWAY PRACTICES FOR MOTIVATING, ENGAGING, AND VOICE-ORIENTED CLASSROOMS
77
• Co-construct safe(r) academic spaces that encourage inquiry, exploration, curiosity, creativity, connection, and risk-taking.
• Make mastery of content and skills (not performance and competition) the goal of academic work.
• Emphasize effort, not intelligence. • Treat mistakes and stumbles as necessary and hopeful signs
of progress. • Make your praise specific, sincere, and spare. You don’t have to
evaluate to encourage.
TAKEAWAY PRACTICES FOR MOTIVATING, ENGAGING, AND VOICE-ORIENTED CLASSROOMS
78
• Co-construct safe(r) academic spaces that encourage inquiry, exploration, curiosity, creativity, connection, and risk-taking.
• Make mastery of content and skills (not performance and competition) the goal of academic work.
• Emphasize effort, not intelligence. • Treat mistakes and stumbles as necessary and hopeful signs
of progress. • Make your praise specific, sincere, and spare. You don’t have to
evaluate to encourage. • Group students heterogeneously and practice differentiation. • Demonstrate what they’ll get out of it, where it will take them,
why it’s important, why they should care. • Don’t spoon-feed—show students they can do it.
TAKEAWAY PRACTICES FOR MOTIVATING, ENGAGING, AND VOICE-ORIENTED CLASSROOMS
79
• When in doubt, provide rigor over remediation. • First challenge, then support/scaffold, then check progress,
then fade and observe, then celebrate (then repeat).
TAKEAWAY PRACTICES FOR MOTIVATING, ENGAGING, AND VOICE-ORIENTED CLASSROOMS (CONTINUED)
80
• When in doubt, provide rigor over remediation. • First challenge, then support/scaffold, then check progress,
then fade and observe, then celebrate (then repeat). • Assess formatively and authentically—think outside the
worksheet. • Give students plenty of opportunities to express their voice
and make a choice—they‘ll start to care if they feel it’s theirs.
TAKEAWAY PRACTICES FOR MOTIVATING, ENGAGING, AND VOICE-ORIENTED CLASSROOMS (CONTINUED)
81
• When in doubt, provide rigor over remediation. • First challenge, then support/scaffold, then check progress,
then fade and observe, then celebrate (then repeat). • Assess formatively and authentically—think outside the
worksheet. • Give students plenty of opportunities to express their voice
and make a choice—they‘ll start to care if they feel it’s theirs. • Recognize avoidance and withdrawal behaviors as reactions to
an environment rather than rejections of learning. • Build, repair, and sustain relationships. Stay connected! • Be enthusiastic!
TAKEAWAY PRACTICES FOR MOTIVATING, ENGAGING, AND VOICE-ORIENTED CLASSROOMS (CONTINUED)
82
• Type your questions in the chat pod on the lower left-hand side of the webinar platform.
• Make sure “Q&A Session” is selected in the “To” field.
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
83
• Full paper, executive summary, and professional development toolkit: http://www.studentsatthecenter.org/topics/motivation-engagement-and-student-voice
• Nakkula, M. J., & Toshalis, E. (2006). Understanding youth: Adolescent development for educators. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
• Understanding-Youth.com • Eric’s faculty page at Lewis & Clark • Mike's faculty page at the University of Pennsylvania
HELPFUL RESOURCES
84
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Eric Toshalis Assistant Professor and Director of the Summer ML/HS MAT Program Graduate School of Educa(on and Counseling Lewis and Clark College Office: (503) 768-‐6117 [email protected] Michael Nakkula Prac(ce Professor and Department Chair Graduate School of Educa(on University of Pennsylvania Office: (215) 898-‐5195 [email protected]
85
SCHOOL TURNAROUND LEARNING COMMUNITY
• Keep an eye out for the upcoming collaborative discussion on today’s topic!
• The recording of today’s webinar will be posted on ED’s online learning community: http://www.schoolturnaroundsupport.org/
• You do not need to be a member to download the recording, but membership is free and joining the Secondary Schools Group gives you access to a wealth of helpful resources, including those mentioned during today’s webinar.
86
TEL 617.728.4446 FAX 617.728.4857 [email protected] 88 Broad Street, 8th Floor, Boston, MA 02110 122 C Street, NW, Suite 650, Washington, DC 20001 WWW.JFF.ORG
Office of Elementary & Secondary Education TEL 1.800.872.5327 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20202 www.ed.gov
87