Modulator-Based, High Bandwidth Optical Links
for HEP Experiments
G. Drake, W. S. Fernando , R. W. Stanek ,D. G. Underwood High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Lab, Argonne,
Il, United States
Jitter (ps)
Noise (mV)
Nice open eye at BER=10-18
For a link at 10 Gb/s - - 10-18 BER =1 error in ~1000 days !
10-12 BER = ~ 900 errors per day !
2
Electro-Optical Modulators• Two methods for optical data transmission
– Direct modulation of light: common in short distance, short wave length communication, all current LHC experiments use this technology
– Indirect modulation of light: long distance, long wave length communication. ATLAS TileCal will test this technology in 2013 (demonstrator) for use in Phase 2 upgrade
2
Current driverLaser
(VCSEL)
Receiver PIN diodes
Optical Tx
Optical Rx
Elec. Tx
Elec. Rx
Voltage driver Modulator
Receiver PIN diodes
Optical Tx
Optical Rx
Elec. Tx
Elec. Rx
Laser (CW)
Monolithically integrated Silicon photonic device
3
Two main types of Modulators
– Mach–Zehnder interferometer basedΔVoltage Δrefractive index phase amplitudePockels effect, Kerr effect, free carrier dispersion effect Materials: LiNbO3, Si, InP
– Absorption basedΔVoltage Δoptical absorptionFranz-Keldysh (FK) effect in bulk semiconductors and quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) in quantum-well (QW) structures. Materials: InP, SiGe, Graphene
3
Input Output
4
Modulating Materials for HEP
4
• LiNbO3 - based on the crystal property – High bandwidth, tested rad-hard, very long (~5 cm), expensive, high
drive voltages
• InP - based on the crystal property– Very High bandwidths, should be rad-hard, small (~2 mm), low drive
voltages, expensive at present, special-purpose technology
• Si - based on the free carrier dispersion effect – High bandwidth, rad-hard (?), small (~1 mm), inexpensive, could
monolithically integrate, commercially available, use existing Si Technology
5
Reliability
• Modulators are very simple and reliable. No known failure mechanisms– e.g. Luxtera transceiver MTBF > 2.3 x 109 hrs (300 million
device hours accumulated without a single intrinsic failure)• E.g. 1 device failure in TileCal >34 years (9 months running, 1024
transceivers)
VCSEL Photonic Si modulator
5
6
Other Considerations
• SM fiber is more rad-hard and cheaper than most MM fiber. Ge doped MM fiber is $
• Lasers designed to run as CW can be more reliable than switched VCSELs.
Also eliminates chirp.• CW lasers can be at the Modulator or remote,
depending on Radiation level.
77
Modulator Selection for ATLAS TileCal • Modulator selection based on several criteria:
– Availability: COTS devices 1st choice– Reliability: Proven in the field– Radiation tolerance: ~100 krad TID, ~1012 p/cm2 (and rad-
hard SM fibers are cheaper than doped MM)
– Cost: Cost Savings over SNAP12 Baseline– Implementation: Ease over Baseline– Bandwidth: 56 Gb/s per readout board– BER: minimal correction needed
7
9.8 mm
4 x 10Gb/s transceiver from Luxtera, 130nm Silicon on Insulator (SOI)
We propose to implement optical links to be used in the TileCal Phase 2 upgrade based on Luxtera’s silicon photonic transceiver. This comes in a standard QSFP package which can be easily plugged into a motherboard. We are doing a Demonstrator.
8
Speed 10 + Gb/fiber commercial integrated optics 40 Gb/fiber with other commercial unitsLaser reliability Either CW laser onboard Or displace laser outside detector. (DFL has Different junction structure than VCSELs)Low Bit Error Rate 10-18 vs typical 10-12 for current systems Simplified error correction schemesLow power One CW laser - split many ways Modulators are very efficient Short electrical paths – no cable drivers Low voltage drivers – not currentRad hard optical parts We have tested silicon integrated optics for >64 krad application Modulator parts should work at much higher levels Optical part expected to work at multi-Mrad
Commercial Integrated Optics Chips are a Promising Form of Modulators.
1 cm
1 cm
laser4 transmit and 4 receive fibers on one integrated optics silicon chip
10Gb/s each fiber
Use of modulators and CW laser
Low power, small size
9
ANL Bench Tests of Quality and BER of the Complete Link(Modulator & Receiver with 200m SM fiber)
FPGA board generate PRBS7 bit stream @10.3125
Gb/s
QSFP Interface board
Luxtera Mod
DSA8200 Communication
Analyzer
4 SMA cables to Tx
SMA
100 m
8 SM fiber bundle
Tx
Rx
Feedback
9
Use FPGA to generate random bit stream 4 input ports, 4 output ports.
4 SMA cables from Rx
Scope to monitor Quality (eye diagram) and calculate Bit Error Rate (BER)
10
Eye diagram of Complete Link
10
The quality of the link is measured and compared with IEEE 802.3ae and the performance exceeds the requirements by 40% more
Mask 140% of 10GBASE-R
11
Verified* Luxtera 10-18 BER Spec
11
Per link @ 10 Gb/s
Why is Low BER important ?• High BER requires Forward Error Correction (FEC) which consumes 30% of the
bandwidth and requires error correction which consumes power and introduce susceptibility to radiation
• BER < 10-18 ~ ~ no need for FEC -> save money and bandwidth and more rad-hard!
Achieved:• Per Link 10Gb/s (faster by x2 the upgrade target)• BER < 10-18 (better by x106 over upgrade performance)• Lower power consumption (factor of x6 the upgrade target)
Jitter (ps)
Noise (mV)Nice open eye at
BER=10-18
10-18 BER =1 error in ~1000 days !
10-12 BER = ~ 900 errors per day
ANL test Luxtera / Molex
Test
12
Summary of Comparison
Versatile Links (target) Luxtera40 G
InP Modulators
LiNbO3Modulator
Technology Directly modulated laser based ( eg. VCSEL) Modulator based
Bandwidth (Gb/s) 5 14 80 40
Bit Error Rate (BER) (10-12) 10-18
Fiber Type Multi Mode Single Mode
Reach (m) 100 4000 10000 10000
Power (mW/Gb/s) 100 8 <50* <50*
Reliability VCSELS have many failure mechanisms, complex No known failure mechanisms, very simple
12
* Estimate
Per fiber
13
Overall Plan for Demo of Luxtera / Molex QSFP Modulator based Devices
On-Detector Counting House200 M
14
A Proposed Interface to the TileCal Main Board
14
12 bit ADCs
TO USA15
PMTshaperIntegratorcharge injection
PMT
ADC low gain
ADC hi gainFP
GA
(Kin
tex-
7)
Seria
lizer
& C
ontr
olIntegrator
multiplexer
Integrator ADC
12 tubes
QSFP connector
6 differential serial links (4 Tx, 2 Rx)
6
Luxtera QSFP has 4 x 14 Gb/s transceiversQSFP: Quad Small Form Factor Pluggable
shaperIntegratorcharge injection
ADC low gain
ADC hi gain
Stockholm and Valencia are now designing the mainboard and ROD to accommodate the Luxtera QSFP package.
Note Extra I2C and monitor links through QSFP connector to emulate non-rad-hard PIC uC
Inside ATLAS Tilecal Iron Girder
Includes duplicate backup links
15
First Steps of ANL Radiation Test Program
3 technologies
Integrated Silicon – CMOS (4-channel)
InP single channel
LiNO3 single channel
NO SEE @ 1012 protons/cm2 & 64 krad TID OK after ~100 krad TID
Proton Beam Electron Beam
Links run continuously at 10 Gb/s during irradiation
and 3.5 x min ionizing
16
Levels of Radiation Sensitivity in Modulator-based COTS devices
• Modulator • Logic and RF circuitry in Modulator chip• Attached CW Laser• Voltage regulators• Glue, Capacitors, etc• Control Unit ( PIC uC or..)• Working Group Wednesday 16:00
Only issue so far
17
In this Luxtera / Molex device
uC is used for startup
reads and sets parameters for operation
also allows readout of temperature, current, etc
After startup, the device will continue to operate
until power down
(or perhaps some large change in device)
We can use external I2C, etc through spare pins on QSFP connector to eliminate uC
18
FPGA board PC
QSFP board
I2C Main+ Power
QSFP connect
I2C
QSFPQSF
P
QSFP
InP
Receivers
LiNbO3
Electrical feedback
Radiation Exposure Region
8 SMA
USB
USB
8 Fiber
12 V
2 x Differential I2C
I2C
SMA
PM Fiber
~100 m8 SMA
CW LasersShielded from radiation
Fiber SM
Fiber SM
2 Fibers SM
Monitoring optical power, Voltages, currents
4 x 10Gb/s BER testing
19
Summary: Modulators• Modulators are a robust replacement for VCSEL-based optical readout:
– High Speed: >10 Gb/s. No speed limits– Reliable: Rad hard, BER ~10-18. MTBF ~2.3 x 109 hrs
• We have proposed an optical link be used in TileCal and have built a prototype link based on Luxtera transceiver– Characterized it for use @ 10 Gb/s with < 10-18 BER– Tested radiation hardness up to 8 x 1011 p/cm2
• No SEU at this level• Need some changes to the controller ----
• Investigating other COTS modulator devices made of other materials. • Investigating options to use modulators in very high radiation environments
such as tracker upgrades
19
20
• Advantages:– Low latency (no velocity factor)– Work over distances from few mm (internal triggers)
to ~Km (counting house) or far ( to satellite orbit)– Low mass – No fiber routing– Communicate between ID layers for trigger
decisions.
20
Development of Free-Space (fiberless) Links Utilizing Modulators
21
Data path for on-board tracking trigger which could couple 2 planes of 3D doublets.
A trigger concept using modulators and prisms
22 22
MEMS Mirrors for steering over ~ order 1 M distance
April 21, 2023 22
A commercially available MEMS mirror (Developed at ARI, Berkeley)
Argonne Center for Nan-scale Materials (CNM) developed novel MEMS mirrors that should solve the problems of commercial mirrors. The mirror is supported laterally and it can be actuated using 4 torsional actuators.
23 23
A nice demonstration 1 Gb/s to a target moving ~1 cm at > 100 Hz
23
CW LASER1550 nm
optical electricADC TIA
DAC
SPI
SPI
X
Y
X
YAmpMEMS Mirrorto steer
Small Prism
850 nm LASER For alignment
ReflectionReflective lens
Rigid Coupling
GRIN lens to Capture
wires
wires
1550 LASER Beam
Modulator
Asphere Lensto launch
Si Detectors
This Assembly moves
SFP
FPGA Bit Error Tester
FPGAFPGA
Lookup table
Lookup table
Digital filter
Digital filter
No Bit errors overnight
24 24
1 Gb/s over 80 Meters
ANL Long Range Free-Space Communication Telescope Demo
24
25
Modulator Plans• Radiation Test Luxtera Molex without the
microcontroller Protons 3.5 x min ioni. Gammas total dose up to 3 MR Neutrons • Radiation test components of Luxtera/Molex Voltage Regulator LaserATLAS Tilecal Demonstrator Tests Kintex 7 FPGARadiation test Other Devices and other materials For higher radiation environmentsDevelop other Optical Communication capabilities
2626
Summary• Modulators are simple, reliable, fast• Silicon Integrated Technology exists for some HEP
applications• For ATLAS Tilecal demonstrator we expect: factor 106 lower BER, factor ~ 3 cost savings factor ~ 6 power savings simplification• We are continuing to test commercial and other
modulators• Have demonstrated precise beam steering with
MEMS mirrors
27
Backup
28
References
[1] KK. Gan, F. Vasay, T Weidberg, “Lessons Learned and to be Learned from LHC”, Joint ATLAS-CMS Working Group on Opto-Electronics for SLHC, ATL-COM-ELEC-2007-001 CMS-IN-2007/066
[2] Philippe Farthouat’s 2011 ATLAS upgrade talk[3] T. Weidberg “VCSEL Reliability Studies and Development of Robust VCSEL Arrays” TWIPP 2011 [4] W. Fernando, “Overview and status of ATLAS pixel detector”, Nucl.Instrum.Meth., A596, 58-62 (2008)[5] D. Giugni, S. Michal, R. Boyd, ATLAS PIXEL nSQP Project, ATL-IP-ES-0150[6] Papotti et. al ,“An Error-Correcting Line Code for a HEP Rad-Hard Multi-GigaBit Optical Link”, 12th Workshop on
Electronics For LHC and Future Experiments, Valencia, Spain, 25 - 29, pp.258-262 (2006)[7] Molex specifications (http://www.molex.com/molex/products/family?
key=fourteen_data_rate_fdr__active_optical_cable_aoc&channel=products&chanName=family&pageTitle=Introduction&parentKey=fiber_optic_product_families)
[8] J. Gilmore, TMB Mezzanine SEU Testing - Preliminary Results (www.physics.ohio-state.edu%2F~gilmore%2Fcms%2Fregulators%2Fcyclotron_report_v2.ppt)
[9] W. Pascher et al., “Modelling and design of a travelling-wave electro-optic modulator on InP”, Opt. Quant. Electron., vol. 35(4), 453-464 (2003)
[10] R. A. Soref and B.R. Bennett , “Electrooptical Effects In Silicon”, J. Quantum Electron., 23, 123 (1987)[11] M. Bruzzi, "Radiation damage in silicon detectors for high-energy physics experiments," Nuclear Science, IEEE
Transactions on , vol.48, no.4, pp.960-971, Aug 2001[12] S.T. Liu et al., "Total dose radiation hard 0.35 μm SOI CMOS technology," Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on , 45(6),
2442-2449 (1998)[13] F Vasey et al, “The Versatile Link common project: feasibility report”, JINST 7 C01075 (2012) doi:10.1088/1748-
0221/7/01/C01075 [14] HHI specifications (http://www.hhi.fraunhofer.de/en/departments/photonic-components/inp-modulators/)
[15] T. Pinguet et al. , "Monolithically integrated high-speed CMOS photonic transceivers," Group IV Photonics, 2008 5th IEEE International Conference on , vol., no., pp.362-364, 17-19 Sept. 2008
[16] C. Gunn, et al., “A 40Gbps CMOS Photonics Transceiver”, Proceedings of SPIE 6477, 64770N (2007).[17] BT Huffman et al.The Radiation Hardness of Certain Optical Fibres for the LHC Upgrades at -25C. JINST 2010 5 C11023.
28
2929
ReferencesRD23 Collaboration, “Optoelectronic Analog Signal Transfer for LHC Detectors”.
CERN/DRDC/91-41/DRDC/P31. CERN, Geneva 1991.[PIXEL]W. Fernando, “Overview and status of ATLAS pixel detector”,. Nucl.
Instrum.Meth 2008; 58-62: A596.[KK] K.K.Gan, W. Fernando, H. Kagan, R. Kass, A. Law et al, “Radiation-Hard
Optical Link for SLHC”. Nucl.Instrum.Meth,2008:88, 2008:88-92:A596. L.S. Yan, Q.Yu, A.E.Willner (UCLA), "Simple Measurement of the Chirp Parameter
of Optical Modulators Using Partial Optical Filtering", Optoelectronics and semiconductor integrated Devices, P2.28, IEEE.
[CHIRP] "Simple Measurement of the Chirp Parameter of Optical Modulators Using Partial Optical Filtering", L.S. Yan, Q.Yu, A.E.Willner (UCLA) Optoelectronics and semiconductor integrated Devices P2.28 IEEE.
[LITHIUM] E.L. Wooton, et. al. (JDS Uniphase), ‘ “« A Review of Lithium Niobate Modulators for Fiber-Optic Communications Systems”, » ) IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, Vol.6 No1,(, (2000) S 1077-260X(260X (00)01136-9.
[TIPP2011] W. Fernando, D. Underwood, R. Stanek, “Optical Data Links – Technology for Reliability and Free Space Links”, Physics Procedia, TIPP11-D-11-00045, (2012) to be published.
30
[DPF] W. Fernando, D. Underwood, R. Stanek “New Optical Link Technologies for HEP Experiments”, Meeting of the Division of Particles and Fields of the American Physical Society, Brown University, August, 2011 arXiv:1109.6842v1.[IEEE] D. Underwood, P. DeLurgio, G. Drake, W. Fernando, D. Lopez, G. Drake, B. Salvachua-Ferrando, R. Stanek, “Development of Low Mass Optical Readout for High Data Bandwidth Systems” IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC), 624-629, 2010.[IBM]W. Green, M. Rooks, L. Sekaric, and Y. Vlasov “Ultra-compact, low RF power, 10 Gb/s silicon Mach-Zehnder modulator”, Opt. Express 2007; 17106-17113:15.[JINST] D. Underwood, B. Salvachua-Ferrando, R. Stanek, D. Lopez, J. Liu, J. Michel, L. C. Kimerling, “New Optical Technology for low mass intelligent trigger and readout”,. JINST 5:C07011,2010.[InP] 40Gb/s InP Modulator ……………………………………… http://www.hhi.fraunhofer.de/fileadmin/hhi/downloads/PC/flyer/40_Gbits_InP_Web.pdf. [PIC] I.Galysh, K.Doherty, J. McGuire, H.Heidt, D.Niemi,G.Dutchover, (The StenSat Group) "CubeSat: Developing a Standard Bus for Picosatellites" http://www.stensat.org/Publications/SPIE.PDF.[FPGA] Z.K.Baker, M.E.Dunham, K.Morgan, M.Pigue, M.Stettler, P.Graham, E.N.Schmierer, J.Power (Los Alamos) “Space Based FPGA Radio receiver Design, Debug, and Development of a Radiation Tolerant Computing System”.International Journal of reconfigurable Computing, Volume 2010,Article ID 546217, doi:10.1155/2010/546217.
31
Commercial integrated optics chips are a promising form of modulatorsFeatures - Speed- 10 Gb/fiber commercial integrated optics 40 Gb/fiber with some commercial units Laser reliability- Either CW laser onboard (different junction structure than VCSELs) Or displace laser outside detector. Low Error Rate 10-18 vs typical 10-12 for current systems Simplified error correction schemes Low power One CW laser - split many ways Modulators are very efficient Short electrical paths – no cable drivers Low voltage drivers – not current drivers Rad hard optical parts We have thoroughly tested silicon integrated optics for 64 K rad application Modulator parts should work at much higher levels Optical part expected to work at multi-Mrad levels
The Future of Optical Links - Light Modulators
32 32
The commercial MEMS mirrors have ~40 dB resonance peaks at 1 and 3 KHz.
To use the direct feedback, developed an inverse Chebyshev filter which has a notch at 1 kHz, and appropriate phase characteristics (Left Figure)
With the filter we were able to make the beam follow a reflecting lens target within about 10 μm when the target moved about 1 mm (Right Figure).
Still has some fundamental issues at large excursion (~1 cm)
A separate feedback link solves this issue
The amplitude-frequency map of our analog feedback loop, demonstrating phase stability at 100 Hz.
A test setup used to demonstrate MEMS mirror steering with an analog control loop which compensates for the mirror resonances at 1 and 3 KHz.
April 21, 2023 32
Studies of Direct Feedback Concept
33 33
Beams in Air: Size vs DistanceDue to diffraction, there is an optimum diameter for a beam for a given
distance in order to reduce 1/r2 losses
The Rayleigh distance acts much like Beta-Star in accelerators – Relates waist size and divergence– Depends on wavelength
If we start with a diameter too small for the distance of interest, the beam will diverge, and will become 1/r2 at the receiver, and we will have large losses (We can still focus what we get to a small device like an APD or PIN diode ). This is typical of space, Satellite, etc. applications.
If we start with an optimum diameter, the waist can be near the receiver, and we can capture almost all the light and focus it to a small spot
Examples, ~ 1 mm for 1 m, ~ 50 mm for 1 KmApril 21, 2023
3434
Proven with a long term BER test on a random cable samples
Tests proved that there is no noise floor
BER Tested by Luxtera
A system has been developed to test in a Voltaire switch (model 4036) with continuous data flow
Switch is fully populated (36 ports) and data is injected in each port at 40Gbps.
Infiniband port counters are used to monitor the actual data flow and presence of errors
Test is run at room temperature.