Download - mnc
TENSIONS FOR HR: WHO TAKES RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORK- LIFE
MANAGEMENT IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS?
Helen De Cieri
Monash University Department of Management
Faculty of Business and Economics PO Box 197 Caulfield East
Victoria Australia 3145 Telephone: + 61 3 9903 2013 Facsimile: + 61 3 9903 2718
E-mail: [email protected]
E. Anne Bardoel Monash University
Department of Management Faculty of Business and Economics
PO Box 197 Caulfield East Victoria Australia 3145
Telephone: + 61 3 9903 2675 Facsimile: + 61 3 9903 2718
E-mail: [email protected]
Final Report to SHRM Foundation June 2008.
This report is based on a paper presented to the Academy of International Business
Annual Conference, June 30 – July 4, Milan Italy.
This research was funded by the Society for Human Resource Management Research
Foundation and by Monash University. We thank Clarice Santos and Trisha Pettit for
their research assistance.
2
ABSTRACT
Balancing demands for global co-ordination with the need for responsiveness to
local conditions presents challenges in many areas of international business. Managing
work-life issues is emerging as a substantial concern for HR managers in many
multinational corporations (MNCs). While work-life management issues are recognized
as important strategic matters, it is well recognized that tensions exist between the parties
involved in implementation of work-life policies and practices. Our study of 13 MNCs
utilizes interviews with 28 HR managers, including both corporate HQ and local
perspectives, to explore the management of work-life issues. In this paper, we apply a
tension-centered approach to understand work-life management. We identify the
responsibilities and strategies for work-life management in MNCs. Our research shows
that there are numerous emerging challenges for researchers and practitioners related to
global work-life management.
3
INTRODUCTION
Globalisation has brought numerous, noteworthy developments in the diversity
and complexity of international business and forms of multinational corporations
(MNCs). Managers in MNCs face substantial challenges in balancing the often
competing pressures for global integration and local responsiveness. Connected with
these developments and challenges has been increasing awareness that the management
of a global workforce, via an international human resource management (IHRM) system,
is a crucial dimension of international business.
The IHRM system can be a key driver in a firm’s ability to attract, retain and
manage talent in global, competitive labour markets. In this paper, we examine the roles
and responsibilities for IHRM in MNCs, with particular focus on work-life management.
We define work-life initiatives as those strategies, policies, programs and practices
initiated and maintained in workplaces to address flexibility, quality of work and life, and
work-family conflict. We argue that global talent management relies on effective IHRM
systems, including a shared understanding of the roles and responsibilities of all
managers. The work-life management area is increasingly recognized as an important
aspect of IHRM in practice and a major factor in talent management (Poelmans, 2005;
Spinks, 2005).
Although there is no uniform definition of work-life initiatives, three primary
categorizations are generally applied when examining work-life initiatives: dependent
care, family leave, and flexible scheduling (Arthur & Cook, 2003). We define work-life
initiatives as those strategies, policies, programs and practices initiated and maintained in
workplaces to address flexibility, quality of work and life, and work-family conflict. The
4
work-life concept was first identified and developed in the USA and in developed
economies (Hein, 2005). It is recognised as an issue across the workforce, from
managerial and professional levels to workers at all levels and across occupational
groups. However, most work-life studies have been conducted in western developed
countries (Spector et al., 2004) and several researchers have debated whether the concept
transfers, or translates, to less Asian countries (Bowes, 2005; Lewis, Gambles &
Rapoport, 2007).
Linked to the discussion of the priority of work-life initiatives in Asia is the
ongoing debate amongst scholars in the broader research field of HRM about the extent
to which HRM practices in MNCs can or should be standardized across global operations
or localized to meet the context of the local unit. As Brewster, Wood and Brookes
(2007) explain, there are three schools of theoretical thought on these issues. First,
globalization theories (which includes universalist views) suggest that MNCs will seek to
implement standardized, or common, HRM practices across their worldwide operations
either to obtain global efficiencies (see, for example, Kostova & Roth, 2002) or because
of ethnocentricity (see Heenan & Perlmutter, 1979). Second, and in contrast, theories of
local isomorphism (or contextualism) argue that MNCs will adapt, and even create, HRM
practices that have the ‘best fit’ with the local political, institutional, social and economic
contexts in which units of the firm are located.
The third school of thought is based in duality theory and suggests that MNCs
“face conflicting pressures both towards and away from the local practices, which may be
exacerbated by regulatory issues or rational determinants such as size, structure, market
conditions and/or the strategic choices made by managers” (Brewster et al., 2007: 1).
5
Balancing the often competing global and local demands presents a substantial challenge
for the HRM function with regard to issues such as work-life management. To think
globally does not preclude attention to local environments and it is important that HR
policy makers give attention to identifying and understanding strategic policy
development at the national, or local, level as well as within a wider global context. In
many developed and developing societies, there has been burgeoning interest in work-life
issues, driven by substantial changes in workforce demography and by increasing
recognition that work-life issues present significant challenges for many people (Hein,
2005; Lewis et al., 2007).
The authors developed a conceptual framework that articulates the antecedents
and consequences of work-life management strategies in a global context (Bardoel & De
Cieri, in press; see Figure 1). However, this framework requires testing and generally
research appears to lag behind practice with respect to global work-life management. We
are not aware of any empirical study that examines management perspectives of work-life
management in a global context. While leading scholars in IHRM have raised awareness
of the constraints and challenges related to managing a global workforce (e.g., Scullion,
Collings & Gunnigle, 2007), there has been little discussion amongst researchers
regarding the roles and responsibilities of managers in MNCs (Brewster, Sparrow &
Harris, 2005), and even less attention given to work-life management in the global
context (Lewis et al., 2007). By bringing together these important yet neglected areas,
we aim to demonstrate that work-life management is an emerging aspect of IHRM and
diversity management programs that contributes to organizational and individual
performance.
6
[Insert Figure 1 here]
In the ‘western’ literature there is an abundance of research in the area of work–
family conflict and work-life issues (Byron, 2005; Greenhaus & Powell, 2006) which has
been largely driven by substantial changes in workforce demography and by increasing
recognition that work-life issues are highly salient for many people (Spector et al., 2004).
In North America, Australia, and Europe there is increasing interest by organizations and
employees to seek ways to better manage the tensions between work and other life
demands (Rapoport, Lewis, Bailyn & Gambles, 2005). However, less is understood about
how these tensions are experienced in Asia and developing nations, let alone how MNCs
could develop a corporate work-life policy where global consistency is likely to be
difficult to implement.
TENSIONS IN GLOBAL WORK-LIFE MANAGEMENT
Extending duality theory (Brewster et al., 2007) by not only recognizing different
pressures but also addressing the dynamics between those pressures, a theoretical
perspective that has strong potential for applicability to the work-life field is the tension-
centered approach. As Trethewey and Ashcraft (2004: 82) explain, ‘a tension-centered
approach begins with the premise that organizations are conflicted sites of human
activity’. Dallimore and Mickel (2006) have suggested that there are inherent tensions in
the pursuit of quality of life, and much of the research in this area has explored tensions
experienced by individuals in this pursuit.
7
Organizational tensions have been broadly defined by Stohl and Cheney (2001:
353-54) as a ‘clash of ideas or principles or actions and the discomfort that may arise as a
result’; such tensions are viewed as ‘inescapable, normal and, in some cases, to be
embraced’ (Tracy, 2004: 121). From this standpoint, an understanding of organizational
tensions may be used in to develop insights into organizational phenomena and change.
Tensions in organizational life have been explored in several studies, identifying tensions
at both micro- and macro-levels (Dallimore & Mickel, 2006; Stohl & Cheney, 2001;
Tracy, 2004). We suggest that tensions will arise in an organization’s pursuit of work-
life management initiatives, such as those that strive to meet both economic and social
goals, or both global and local concerns.
Drawing from the tension-centred research, we propose that tensions exist in
individual-organizational interactions such as negotiation of roles and responsibilities
related to work-life matters in MNCs. We favor Grzywacz and Carlson’s (2007) approach
to conceptualizing work-family balance which focuses on the accomplishment of role-
related expectations that are negotiated and shared between an individual’s role-related
responsibilities at work and with their family. However we argue that this understanding
of role-related responsibilities can also be extended to include not only family
responsibilities but also include responsibilities to oneself, one’s community, and the
many priorities that may or may not have to do with family (Bardoel, 2006). The shift in
terminology from labeling organizational initiatives as work-life instead of work-family
reflects a broadening of quality of life issues and career issues for both men and women.
Its also reflects a call for HR practitioners to play a significant role in shifting thinking
8
beyond merely providing programs to viewing work-life issues more systemically, so
they are included in work process redesign and cultural change processes.
The tension-centered approach informs our understanding of work-life
management in MNCs in several ways. As shown in Figure 2, numerous tensions can be
identified in the management of work-life in a global context. While we do not claim that
this represents a conclusive list of all tensions possible for an MNC, this list presents
examples of the most prevalent and important tensions likely to arise in global work-life
management. As has been well-documented in international business research, there are
inherent tensions between priorities and concerns upheld by various stakeholders and
drivers in MNCs. Managers in MNCs need to balance the often conflicting needs of
global efficiencies and co-ordination (integration) with responsiveness to factors such as
political pressures in each local market (differentiation) (Doz & Prahalad, 1991). The
paradox of ‘think globally, act locally’ is a dilemma facing HR professionals working in
MNCs facing unprecedented levels of global mergers, acquisitions and international
growth. We postulate that these tensions may be expressed as different priorities and
concerns at different levels (e.g. strategy/policy vs. operational); in different
organizational units (e.g., headquarters vs. subsidiary); in different functions (e.g., HR vs.
line management); and between management and employees. Further, we envisage
potential tensions that permeate the organizational boundaries of an MNC, such as
tensions between economic and social/moral concerns, institutional requirements and
organizational needs, or between collective and individual concerns (e.g., organizational
performance and gender equity).
[Insert Figure 2 here]
9
In addition, we acknowledge that there is tension between academic and practical
priorities and concerns with respect to managing global work-life. Concern about tension
between academic research and management practice is not new; as research technology
has become more sophisticated, it has been seen by practitioners as less useful for solving
their organizational problems. Rynes, Bartunek and Daft (2001) note evidence of the
pervasiveness of a management research-practice gap and comment that managers
typically do not use academic research or academic research findings when developing
their management practices. Scholars have recently argued for evidence-based
approaches to HRM and the establishment of better links between research and practice
(Rousseau, 2006; Rynes, Giluk, & Brown, 2007), particularly with regard to
understanding how HR practices affect performance and organizational outcomes (Rynes
et al., 2007). Hence, we encourage conversations between scholars and practitioners in
developing research and practice in work-life management.
Moving beyond identification of tensions, we propose that managers in MNCs
need to understand and develop ways and means to resolve these tensions. According to
Bird (2006), the demand for work-life solutions by employees and managers is expanding
and it will be one of the issues that executives and HR professionals will be expected to
manage over the next decade. Drawing from the literature on managing paradox (Poole
& Van De Ven, 1989), we note four potential strategies that may be applicable to tensions
in global work-life management:
• Opposition – Accept that paradox exists and use it constructively;
• Spatial separation – clarify level of analysis and connections between them;
• Temporal separation – take time into account; and
10
• Synthesis – develop new terms to resolve paradox.
It is likely that combinations of the above could be found in practice. While research has
begun to explore tensions in work-life management (Dallimore & Mickel, 2006), our
research on tensions in global work-life management, and in exploring resolutions of
tensions, breaks new ground.
As our research is exploratory, we focus on the roles and responsibilities within
the HR function in MNCs; namely, the management of a global work-life strategy that
will support a global workforce. Despite the potential benefits associated with global
work-life strategies, the specific challenges associated with the development of effective
work-life strategies that balance global and local demands need to be identified and
understood. Global work-life efforts need to be strategically connected to strategic
objectives such as diversity and performance management, recognizing the need for
MNCs is to achieve competitive advantage, but not at the expense of human health, well-
being and personal lives. In addition, there are specific and unique challenges for
managers seeking to attract, retain and manage the talent required to implement a global
strategy which is of critical importance to the organization’s long-term survival.
THE VALUE OF VERTICAL INTEGRATION FOR HRM IN A GLOB AL
CONTEXT
Human resource management (HRM) is widely practised in many economies
worldwide and is an important function in many MNCs (see, for example, Brewster et al.,
2005). There is now considerable evidence that characteristics of the HRM function,
including the manner in which HRM roles and responsibilities are ascribed, vary in
11
significant ways across countries and firms (Larsen & Brewster, 2003). Several
researchers (e.g., Brewster et al., 2005; De Cieri & Dowling, 2006) have discussed the
need for MNCs to develop an IHRM strategy to establish shared global guidelines, while
allowing for local differences. However, balancing the often competing global and local
demands presents a substantial challenge for IHRM. To think globally does not preclude
attention to local environments and it is important that HR policy makers give attention to
identifying and understanding strategic policy development at the national, or local, level
as well as within a wider global context. For example, the business case for adopting
work-life initiatives is both powerful and convincing (Kossek & Lambert, 2005; Masi &
Jacobsen, 2003). In many developed and developing societies, there has been burgeoning
interest in work-life issues, driven by substantial changes in workforce demography and
by increasing recognition that work-life issues present significant challenges for many
people (Lewis et al., 2007). Many HR policies and practices, including work-life
management, may work well in developed, ‘Western’, countries but less well in
developing and transitional economies, such as in Asian cultural contexts (Lewis et al.,
2007).
Further, it can be argued that it is the overall understanding and support for HRM
within the organization, rather than HRM policy design, that has the potential to add real
value to an organization (Pfeffer, 2005). Bowen and Ostroff (2004) emphasize the
importance of a shared view of HRM, and argue that the impact of the HRM system on
performance outcomes will not be determined by the content of HRM practices and
policies but rather by the processes that signal to employees desired and appropriate HR
responses to form a collective sense of what is expected. This highlights the value of a
12
shared understanding of responsibilities related to HRM amongst managers in a
transnational firm.
Vertical integration of the HR function provides an important key to achieving
this shared understanding. Vertical integration has two directions, namely upward and
downward. ‘Upward’ refers to strategic HR integration, or the involvement of HRM in
the formulation and implementation of organizational strategies and the alignment of
HRM with the strategic needs of an organization (Budhwar, 2000; Farndale, 2005). The
involvement of the senior HR manager in a firm’s senior management team provides an
important channel for information flow and communication. Traditionally, ‘downward’
refers to the delegation or devolvement of HR practices to local HR operational managers
and to line managers by de-centralizing responsibility for the execution and
administration of HR practices such as performance assessment, selection and training
(Budhwar, 2000; Currie & Proctor, 2001). In global firms, there are layers of vertical
integration within the HR function which involve how the global headquarters’ HR
function devolves global HR strategies to the regional HR managers (who can be
conceptualized as a form of HR ‘line manager’ in an MNC) before HR policy cascades to
the traditional operational line manager (see Novicevic & Harvey, 2001).
Several writers who have contributed to the debate on the future of the HRM field
have argued that it is not enough for HR to simply partner top management; it has to
actually drive business success (Cascio, 2005; Welbourne, 2005). It has been argued that,
to make HR managers more available for participation in strategic decision-making
processes, the responsibility of day-to-day HR practices should be delegated to local HR
and line managers as they have direct and frequent contact with employees and a capacity
13
to understand, motivate, control, and respond quickly to employees (see Budhwar &
Khatri, 2001; Currie & Proctor, 2001). However, for the benefits of devolvement to be
realized, there first needs to be effective management within the HR function, providing
training, resources, incentive and a communication channel between HQ and local units,
to ensure HR practices are carried out in accordance with HRM policy (Budhwar, 2000;
Budhwar & Khatri, 2001).
The opportunities and the difficulties of vertical integration are obviously
magnified across international boundaries. There are many unresolved questions about
how HR work is conducted: responsibilities at the different levels will vary considerably;
further, there are likely to be differences between headquarters and subsidiaries in MNCs,
within the HR function. It is inevitable that tensions will arise as all managers across
MNCs strive to negotiate their roles and responsibilities. In this paper, we focus on the
area of work-life management as a lens through which to explore the tensions related to
the vertical integration of IHRM in MNCs.
A FRAMEWORK FOR GLOBAL WORK-LIFE MANAGEMENT
We propose that a viable approach to managing global work-life would be to
view it as one aspect of a global diversity management agenda, under the rubric of the
IHRM strategy (Childs, 2005). We note that practitioners such as Childs (2005) seem to
be ahead of researchers in recognizing the importance of work-life as an aspect of global
diversity management (Nishii & Özbilgin, 2007). The tensions identified earlier in
Figure 2 are implicit throughout this framework of global work-life management. The
matrix presented in Figure 3 depicts the influences on the IHRM system, and specifically
14
the components of global diversity, including work-life management, and the anticipated
outcomes for individuals and MNCs.
[Insert Figure 3 here]
Korabik, Lero and Ayman (2003) distinguish two different approaches to work-
family research that has been carried out globally: micro- and macro-level approaches.
First, the micro-level approach emanating mostly from North America has focused
mainly on workplaces and the business case for developing more effective management
approaches to reducing work-family conflict. Second, the macro-level approach has
derived mainly from Europe and has identified the critical importance of public policies
in relation to expectations about men and women’s roles and employment supportive
policies such as paid parental leave and benefits. We suggest that, for researchers and
managers, it is important to consider the potential interactions between micro-and macro-
level approaches to work-family issues, and so we seek to integrate these two approaches.
Hence, we draw on both micro- and macro-level work-family approaches, to develop a
comprehensive framework of work-life issues from a global perspective.
Michaels (1995) noted that, although many US corporations have been leaders in
developing work-life programs, there is much to be gained by comparing how other
countries’ values, policies and programs address work-life issues; in particular the role of
additional change agents such as unions, agencies and governments. Hence, we note in
our framework that there are numerous global and local factors influences that are
important to recognize as potential influences on global work-life management. As noted
earlier, managers in MNCs need to balance the often conflicting global influences (such
as industry characteristics and global market factors) with local influences (such as
15
(institutional frameworks, local culture, and the stage of local economic development)
(Doz & Prahalad, 1991). In addition to this global/local dilemma, there are numerous
MNC characteristics that should be recognized as influences on the IHRM system and
therefore on global work-life management; these include the age and international
experience of the MNC, strategic orientation, organizational culture, structure and
strategy, and available resources (De Cieri & Dowling, 2006). We also suggest that the
roles and responsibilities adopted by all managers across the MNC will be important
influences on the way in which the IHRM system, including work-life initiatives, is
developed and implemented (Novicevic & Harvey, 2001). Welbourne (2005) has argued
that the support of top management for HRM initiatives is critical for successful talent
management; further, HRM should be recognized as a priority for all managers. IHRM
initiatives, including work-life initiatives, will be most effective when led by senior
leaders and supported and understood throughout the organization. An implication of
these ideas is that HR professionals may have to proactively assist the organization in
understanding and adjusting its mindset, so that human resource practices become a
source of competitive advantage. Part of the strategy to achieve this is to attract and
retain individuals who possess higher quality human capital.
Hence, the IHRM system needs to deliver a strategic approach to HR, as
attracting and retaining the people required to implement a global strategy is of critical
importance to the organization’s long-term survival (Stroh & Caligiuri, 1998). Scholars
and practitioners have used the phrase ‘talent management’ to describe a long-term and
integrated approach to managing employees, attracting them into the organization,
providing development and engagement opportunities utilizing a sophisticated system of
16
HR practices, and retaining valued employees in the organization.
Central to a global work-life management strategy in an MNC is the
acknowledgement that, although there are a number of common issues faced by working
women and men and their families, the global work-life strategy needs to balance shared
concerns with a course of action that is appropriate to each local environment. Global
work-life needs assessments conducted by work-life consultants Shapiro and Noble
(2001) have identified three surprisingly consistent themes in what employees from
around the world identify as being important barriers to reconciling their work and
personal lives. The three issues identified included a lack of flexible work policies and
practices, the availability and affordability of dependent care, and the negative impact of
work overload and long working hours; hence, we place these at the core of the IHRM
system for global work-life management.
With regard to outcomes of global work-life management, Haas, Hwang and
Russell (2000) have identified a range of benefits that may accrue to employees and
organizations that implement work-life practices and policies. First, work-life practices
can provide an incentive to increase motivation, job satisfaction and commitment and
thus achieve higher levels of engagement and productivity from the current labour pool.
Second, these practices can be part of strategy that supports attracting, managing and
retaining the talent. For example, global diversity management and work-life initiatives
can provide a means for knowledge sharing across an MNC, leading to reduction of
tensions and better understanding of the priorities and concerns of various parties. Third,
an effective work-life strategy can enable the best quality people to advance in the
organization. For example, it has been recognized that barriers to women include having
17
to take time out for dependent care responsibilities and a lack of flexibility in career
structures. Finally, companies can obtain community recognition and reputation by being
seen as a ‘good’ corporate citizen or caring organization. As Childs (2005: 113) has
stated, ‘Leaders must help all people with their business understand that workforce
diversity [including work-life management] can be the bridge between the workplace and
the marketplace’. Western researchers have reported on a range of potential benefits
including acknowledgement of being a ‘good’ corporate citizen (Russell & Bourke,
1999); improved organizational commitment (Allen, 2001); increased job satisfaction
(Bedeian, Burke & Moffett, 1988); improved organizational performance (Perry-Smith &
Blum, 2000); increased organizational productivity (Konrad & Mangel, 2000); and,
improved staff morale (McCampbell, 1996). Furthermore, both HRM and management
consultants suggest that WLB strategies can enhance the employer brand that will lead to
other associated benefits including a broader and better quality labour pool available,
improved employee retention and reduced turnover (Barrow & Moseley, 2006).
Overall, the complexities and ongoing developments related to the global work-
life management present many important challenges and opportunities for managers in
MNCs, and for the researchers who seek to study these firms. Several of these
challenges, demands and opportunities are directly related to vertical integration of the
HRM function in MNCs. However, to date, little research has endeavored to integrate the
micro- and macro-level approaches; nor has there been much attention given by
researchers to the strategic role of work-life management as part of IHRM. In this
research, we explore three broad research questions:
18
1. Who has the responsibility, authority and accountability for work-life management,
and at what level?
2. Who is responsible for carrying the work-life policies through into practice?
3. How can tensions related to global work-life management be resolved?
Our research project aimed to identify and explore the antecedents and
consequences of work/life balance in a global context, so that organizations that operate
internationally can have specific strategies in responding to individual work/life balance
needs, taking into account local and global influences.
RESEARCH METHOD
As this is a new area of research, the central research objective is exploratory in
nature, and that this research project focuses exclusively on organizations, the research
was suited to a case study approach (Patton, 2002).
Von Glinow, Drost and Teagarden (2002) note that much of IHRM has been
parochially focused (mainly on the U.S. and occasionally on Europe and at a stretch
Japan), and has used quantitative research methods. According to Von Glinow et al.
(2002) there is a place for the precision of valid and reliable scales but quantitative
methodologies run the risk of masking anomalies and counterintuitive findings in
different cultural contexts. They encouraged future researchers to use broad research
lenses with multiple embedded contexts when conducting globally distributed IHRM
research; our study follows their advice.
Similarly, work-life scholars have called for future research to incorporate a focus
on how global organizations can be inclusive of work-life issues in multiple cultural
contexts (Poelmans, 2005; Poster & Prasad, 2005). As Poelmans (2005) concludes, there
19
is a need for more qualitative research that involves case studies of international
companies to explore the impact of globalization on work-family policy development in
companies.
Hence, we have purposefully selected a methodology that allows us to gather
insights of significant global or converging trends in work-life management strategies
across cultures, industries, and organizations we examined. The methodology allows us
to unearth issues involving the key tensions and derived etics related to global work-life
management by having a ‘…heightened awareness of the polycontextuality that
surrounds all of our IHRM practices’ (Von Glinow et al., 2002, p.137).
Participants
This research involved a select group of 12 large MNCs; each MNC had a
corporate (HQ) HRM office and regional and/or national HRM managers (see Table 1).
In each MNC, we interviewed a senior HR executive at headquarters and 1 to 3 HR
managers in a regional or national role. Participants’ demographic data are shown in
Table 2. Key informants were chosen within the organization based on their formal
position and their knowledge (Marschan-Piekkari, Welch, Penttinen & Tahvanainen,
2004). Key informant sampling was chosen because the participants were most likely to
be knowledgeable about the issues being researched and able and willing to communicate
about them (Kumar, Stern & Anderson, 1993). The research required knowledge of the
work-life initiatives in each organization; Formal positions of interviewees include global
managers or directors responsible for HR or diversity and work-life management at a
national or regional level.
[Insert Tables 1 and 2 here]
20
Ten of the participating MNCs had between 25,000 and 209,000 employees
worldwide; one of the remaining MNCs is a joint venture between an Indian firm and a
Japanese global firm, and is the world-leader in its products. The sample firms operated
across a range of industries, including mining and mining services, health insurance and
care services, transport and logistics; information technology; finance; automotive;
manufacturing and retail.
Assurances of confidentiality were given to the participants and as such none of
the firms or managers is identified in this paper. As is characteristic of many qualitative
studies, our aim was to obtain richness of understanding of our participants’ views, rather
than generalizability.
Procedure
Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with managers in 9
countries, namely Australia, Brazil, China, England, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia,
Sweden and the U.S.A. Twenty-seven interviews were in English and 1 in Portuguese.
Interviews were recorded and transcribed (interview in Portuguese was transcribed and
then translated into English). Most of the interviews were conducted in person, although
a few were conducted by telephone due to the geographic spread of the sample;
interviews ranged in length from 45 minutes to two hours.
The semi-structured interviews focused on each manager’s understanding of
diversity and work-life initiatives in their region and the global organization. Prior to the
conduct of each interview, the interviewee was provided with details outlining the intent
of the research (Daniels & Cannice, 2004).
21
In addition to interview data, company documents were collected primarily to
provide background for the researchers to better understand the operations and culture of
each MNC. Company documents included strategy documents, HRM policy and
procedures, organizational charts, and MNC websites.
Data Analysis
We used computer-aided qualitative analysis software (NVIVO) to reduce, sort
and cluster the interview data and derive key themes (Richards & Richards, 1995). In
line with Lee, Mitchell and Sablynski’s (1999) framework, we undertook a process of
agreeing on thematic content. In presenting our interview data, we show the job title,
company/industry, and location of the source.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
Responsibility for Global Work-Life Policy
Our first broad research question asked: Who has the responsibility, authority and
accountability to set work-life policies, and at what level? Our findings showed that,
consistently across the MNCs in our research, policies are designed at global
headquarters, although in some MNCs, participants described processes of consultation
and involvement in decision-making leading to policy formulation.
Global – local tensions. We identified numerous examples of tensions between
global policy-makers and local managers, reflecting the well-known global-local
dilemma (Doz & Prahalad, 1991). Several of our participating MNCs reported that they
had acknowledged problems related to poor relationships between global and local units,
and were now working to overcome those:
22
… it was very ethnocentric … and they had an operation in [local unit country]
that … had never really been effectively integrated into the company, it was just a
satellite. There’s probably fault on both sides. [Global HR Head, Transport &
logistics, UK]
As has been documented with respect to other areas of IHRM (Brewster et al.,
2007), global work-life policies are often adapted for local conditions. We found
consistent evidence of the need for a comprehensive understanding of local institutional
and contextual conditions:
… under the global principles various operating countries will form their own
policies for work life balance. … Like in Malaysia we provide child care centre,
but in China we don’t do that, we do other things. But basically following what
the law says and the locations that you operate and following the local market
practice. … we focus a lot on …initially setting up flexible working hours, part-
time working policies, and … 50% of the job be filled with women, minority
etcetera. but in the end the exact policy in China will be different from even
policies in Malaysia. [HR General Manager, Oil-B, Hong Kong]
Local influences on global work-life policies and practices include legislation, customer
characteristics, market factors, and labour market changes, such as:
…from a business perspective our clients are changing… we need to make sure
that we meet the needs of those clients, but there are also pressures from clients
that go against the policies and the objectives that we set. [HR Manager, Finance,
Hong Kong]
23
Even within one MNC, we found differences between the perspectives of HR
practitioners at global and local levels. Whilst the interviewee at headquarters with
global responsibility discussed an ‘80/20 rule’, none of the local or regional managers
interviewed in this MNC were aware of this ‘rule’:
We want to make sure that what we develop at a corporate level can be
implemented at the geography level and those individuals are actually a part of
[our] team. So we use what we call the 80/20 rule. Eighty percent is standard
and can be implemented across [MNC]. We want to have some consistency of
approach that’s based on being able to manage a culture, affordability and
implementation for all, so employees do not get conflicting messages. So that is
the 80%. Twenty percent is driven based on the business needs, local legislations
and the culture of the geography. [Global Diversity Manager, IT, USA]
The strategy is a common strategy... The initiatives and policies are followed too.
… Sometimes there is an initiative that is not adequate for our reality, then we
have to say, look, we are not going to implement it because it won’t be effective.
Then we go back in a structured manner showing why it doesn’t make sense.
[National Diversity Manager, IT, Brazil]
They’re trying to standardise flexible work options… So for a lot of the Asia
region they don’t have a lot of these workplace practices, so irrelevant of their
culture they actually have to try and implement them and make them part of it.
24
… [MNC] globally says ‘we will become a flexible workforce and you’re not
and but we’re going to help you to do that, it doesn’t matter about your culture,
you’re going to have to sort that out as well’. [National Diversity Manager, IT,
Australia]
The different views expressed by HR managers at global HQ and in local units
may indicate that, even in an MNE that is well-advanced in terms of managing diversity
and work-life issues, there may be deficiencies in the IHRM system with regard to
knowledge transfer and shared understanding of the policy. Such deficiencies may
become significant if they lead to mis-understandings within, and outside, the HR
function. Minbaeva (2005) has argued that the IHRM system of an MNE will be a key
driver of its knowledge management, and hence essential to its success in international
business. Her argument reflects Kogut and Zander’s (1993) proposal that an MNE could
be viewed as a social community that creates, transfers, and integrates knowledge across
its different locations. In order for the MNE to operate effectively in this way, the IHRM
system, and the related policies such as work-life policies, need to be well understood and
supported by those within the HR function. However, in all of the MNCs, we found
evidence that policies planned at global HQ were not being implemented, and HQ were
unaware that their policies were not being followed in local units:
I’ve said that we have regional policies it doesn’t mean that they’re necessarily
being taken up. [Diversity Manager, Finance, Hong Kong]
25
… to give you an example of our diversity … the gay, lesbian, bi-sexual and
transgender [GLBT] constituency … is also a group where we look into ensuring
that the workplace is conducive for employees. So yes we have these challenges
… trying to introduce the same kind of initiatives that we have in US...
International Womens Day is celebrated 8 March every year … in all the
countries we have posters put up, communication note going out to employees ....
But the GLBT is not celebrated in the same way. In fact the posters are not put
up in all locations, it’s definitely not in Malaysia or Indonesia because they’re
Muslim countries or rather the majority of the place is Muslim… [Diversity
Manager, IT, Singapore]
We also found evidence of feedback from local units informing or changing
global policy, and examples of local initiatives adopted globally or in other regions.
Given that several of our local managers were located in large emerging markets of
China, Brazil and India (Economist Intelligence Unit, 2007), it is imperative that HQ
listen and respond to local needs, and are prepared to adapt.
Implementing Global Work-Life Policies
Our second broad research question asked: Who is responsible for carrying out
the work-life policies through into practice? In addition to the evidence showing
tensions between those responsible for global and local HR, we found that
implementation of work-life policy is frequently a source of tension between the HR
function and line managers. Decisions related to employee access to work-life practices
were often at the discretion of direct supervisors and depends on the employee’s function.
26
There were often informal arrangements that depend on job/function (such as whether
there is interaction with client), and require negotiation with one’s supervisor or manager.
HR – line manager tensions. We found ample evidence of tensions between HR
(at global or local levels) and line managers when participants talked about
implementation of policies. For example:
If anyone tells us we don’t have female candidates, suitable candidates then the
managers are also taken to task, what are you doing in development of the next
group below you. So there are questions that they need to answer at every point.
[Global Diversity Advisor, Oil-A, Malaysia]
We have argued earlier that, to make HR managers more available for
participation in strategic decision-making processes, responsibility of day-to-day HR
practices should be delegated to local HR and line managers (Budhwar & Khatri, 2001).
However, line managers need to possess appropriate skills to execute HR practices
competently and effectively (Budhwar, 2000). The role and responsibility of the line
manager has been debated, although not in the context of MNCs. We suggest that the
HR- line manager relationship needs more investigation for scholars and managers to
better understand how devolvement of the HR function in MNCs can contribute to
organizational performance.
MNC – employee tensions. It is evident that the priorities and concerns for an
individual employee will not always match those of the MNC overall. Work-life policies
and practices can form an important aspect of relationships with employees, to facilitate
27
individual outcomes such as engagement, commitment and satisfaction (Haas et al.,
2000).
We understand that when you have a relationship with an employee you know the
organisation-employee relationship that it doesn’t just stop at the office for them.
And it doesn’t just stop at work for them it’s a whole package. [National
Diversity Manager, IT, Australia]
Resolving Tensions
With regard to our third broad research question, the resolution of tensions and
development of effective ways of management work-life were emphasized by our
participants (shown in Table 3, with examples of evidentiary statements). Our
participants were able to identify ways and means of resolving tension, which were
consistent with the four reactions to paradox identified by Poole and Van De Ven (1989).
Most of the reported resolutions fell into the category of synthesis (develop new terms to
resolve paradox), with some evidence also of opposition (accept that paradox exists and
use it constructively), although it is possible that these efforts may include some
combination of the other reactions to paradox identified by Poole and Van De Ven
(1989).
[Insert Table 3 here]
Evidence of opposition included refusal by the local HR managers to adopt global
policy designed at HQ, or some discussion followed by ‘agreeing to disagree’. Managers
in all of the MNCs reported that there is scope to negotiate between global and local
concerns.
We identified 11 categories of synergistic strategies, techniques or MNC features
28
that managers are using to resolve tensions, although this is not a conclusive list. These
include strategies that require attention and support at global HQ, such as development of
clear policies and expectations, resourcing for work-life initiatives, and HQ respect for
local knowledge. Our participants recognized that work-life management should be
integrated with other HR practices in the IHRM system. There are also several strategies
to be led by the HR function, such as communication, awareness and support and
gathering information, measurement and feedback on work-life initiatives. There are
numerous ways in which our participants sought to resolve tensions with line managers,
including engagement in decision making, building HR competencies, and providing
training, education and advice (for all levels of managers, employees and colleagues).
Participants also offered suggestions for all employees, such as developing rapport with
one’s manager, and respecting and accepting diversity in the workplace.
An Emerging Issue: Work-Life in Asia
Human Resource Management (HRM) and Diversity and Inclusion managers
working for MNCs and based in China and other parts of Southeast Asia (e.g. Singapore,
Malaysia, Indonesia) increasingly have to deal with the concept of work-life management
where the push often emanates from a western based head office to how this actually
translates in an Asian workplace context.
The difficulties of attracting and retaining talent are particularly evident in
dynamic economies, such as in China and Southeast Asia (Howard, Liu, Wellins. &
Williams, 2007; Russell, 2008; Sankaran, 2008). Particular themes/issues that emerged
as important in the Asian context were: Asian culture and work-life; the war for talent;
29
the need for local responsiveness; flexible work arrangements; equity; gender and care
issues, and overall diversity management.
Implications for Global Work-Life Management Practi ce
Overall, our analysis of global work-life management demonstrates that there
needs to be a stronger understanding of the tensions between various drivers, and the
possible responsibilities to resolve tensions and manage work-life in MNCs. Table 4
summarizes the key responsibilities for work-life management at the global, HR and line
management levels. These responsibilities can be adopted by managers as
accountabilities for the various elements of our matrix of global work-life management
(shown in Figure 3).
[Insert Table 4 here]
There are several global responsibilities for work-life management. For senior
executives, responsibilities include endorsement of work-life initiatives and provision of
adequate resourcing (Enns & McFarlin, 2005). The corporate HQ HR professionals will
have global responsibility for formulating global policy, yet also need to be responsive to
local concerns (Novicevic & Harvey, 2001). Conversely, implementation relies to a large
extent on the engagement, knowledge and competencies of local HR. We anticipate that
global work-life management raises several challenges, particularly for MNCs seeking to
operate in developing and growing markets, such as the large emerging markets of Brazil,
Russia, India and China. First, recruiting and selecting candidates for local HR positions
can be difficult, as many employers report difficulty in recruiting people with HR
experience and knowledge in emerging markets. A second challenge is to develop talent
in the HR function; HR professionals in dynamic markets such as China require
30
competencies such as communication and networking skills, to build strong relationships
with line managers; as well as a strong understanding of the IHRM system. Resolving
the global-local tensions within the HR function depends to some extent on the ability to
develop a shared view of the IHRM system and to build synergies across levels of the HR
function (Bowen & Ostroff, 2004). Building these competencies will help to build the
credibility of HR managers with senior and line managers (Enns & McFarlin, 2005;
Farndale, 2005). A third challenge is that HR professionals need to form networks in the
HRM community outside their own organization. Knowledge sharing amongst the HRM
community can be an important mechanism for designing and managing improvements in
HRM policies and practices; for example, in China, the importance of networks or guanxi
has been widely recognized. Finally, HR practitioners must address the challenge of
working with line managers and employees to build their competencies; training
programs, and the provision of advice, support and resources are examples of the ways in
which work-life initiatives can become embedded in an MNC.
Limitations of this Research
We acknowledge that there are limitations in our study. First, we acknowledge that
this research is limited to firms that are well-established and large. We have, however,
improved on previous research in the HRM field, as our interview data include more than
one informant from each organization. Much of the previous research has provided only a
single-rater response. Second, we have suggested that achieving a link between
organizational strategy and HR practices will be an important antecedent of effective
global work-life management. However, it is important to note that factors such as
culture, environmental, and institutional forces, as well as resource allocation, may
31
influence the success (and outcomes) of global work-life management (Brewster et al.,
2007); the factors external to the organization would be worthwhile areas for future
research. We also recognize that, given that organizational-level analysis has tended to
dominate much of the HRM literature (Paauwe & Boselie, 2005), factors at other levels
in the firm (e.g. individual level) or external to the firm need to be investigated. Future
research could also explore the views of line managers and employees.
CONCLUSION
This project addresses several limitations of previous work-family research by
investigating work-family issues in MNCs and across different socio-cultural contexts,
and by utilizing an exploratory, qualitative research method to identify issues hitherto not
on the research agenda (Poelmans, 2005). We identified numerous tensions to be
resolved in order for global work-life management to be managed effectively. The
managers in our study clearly are seeking to address ongoing tensions by adopting
synergistic strategies to manage work-life issues.
As Childs has noted, ‘The business of workforce diversity is constantly evolving
and presents us with new and different challenges, especially as businesses become more
global’ (2005: 117). A consistent emerging theme identified by many of the HR and
diversity managers interviewed was that work-life balance is important for talent
management and for developing a high performing workforce. Employees around the
world are becoming increasingly vocal about their work and family needs and the issue of
managing work-life needs is likely to grow. Managers and employees are beginning to
recognize the strategic role of global work-life policies and practices in managing a
global workforce; this presents several challenges for the HR function in MNCs.
32
REFERENCES
Allen, T.D. 2001. Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational
perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4): 414-435.
Arthur, M. & Cook, A. 2003. The relationships between work-family human resource
practices and firm profitability: A multitheoretical perspective. Research in
Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22, 219-252.
Bardoel, E.A. 2006. Work-life and HRD. In P. Holland, & H. De Cieri (Eds.),
Contemporary issues in human resource development: An Australian perspective:
237-259. Sydney NSW: Pearson Education.
Bardoel, E.A. & De Cieri, H. (in press). Policy deployment across borders: A framework
for work-life initiatives in multinational enterprises. In S. Poelmans & P. Caligiuri
(Eds.), Harmonizing work, family, and personal life in organizations: From policy to
practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barrow, S., & Mosley, R. 2006. The employer brand: Bringing the best of brand
management to people at work. Chichester UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Bedeian, A.G., Burke, B.G., & Moffett, R.G. 1988. Outcomes of work-family conflict
among married male and female professionals. Journal of Management, 14(3): 475-
491.
Bird, J. 2006. Work-life balance: Doing it right and avoiding the pitfalls, Employment
Relations Today, 33(3): 21-30.
Bowen, D.E., & Ostroff, C. 2004. Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The
role of “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29: 203-
221.
33
Bowes, J.M. 2005. Emphasizing the family in work-family research: A review of current
research and recommendations for future directions. In S.A.Y. Poelmans (Ed.), Work
and family: An international research perspective (pp. 415-438). Mahwah NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brewster, C., Sparrow, P., & Harris, H. 2005. Towards a new model of globalizing HRM.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16: 953-974.
Brewster, C., Wood, S., & Brookes, M. 2007. Similarity, isomorphism or duality?
Recent survey evidence on the human resource management policies of multinational
corporations. British Journal of Management, published online September 2007,
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00546.x
Budhwar, P. 2000. Strategic integration and devolvement of human resource management
in the UK manufacturing sector. British Journal of Management, 11: 285-302.
Budhwar, P., & Khatri, N. 2001. HRM in context: Applicability of HRM models in India.
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1: 333-356.
Byron, K. 2005. A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67: 169-198.
Cascio, W. F. 2005. From business partner to driving business success: The next step in
the evolution of HR management. Human Resource Management, 44: 159-163.
Childs, J.T. (Jr.) 2005. Workforce diversity: A global HR topic that has arrived. In M.
Losey, S. Meisinger & D. Ulrich (Eds.), The future of human resource management:
110-118. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Currie, G., & Procter, S. 2001. Exploring the relationship between HR and middle
managers. Human Resource Management Journal, 11(3): 53-69.
34
Dallimore, E. J., & Mickel, A. E. 2006. Quality of life: Obstacles, advice, and employer
assistance. Human Relations, 59: 61-103.
Daniels, J.D., & Cannice, M.V. 2004. Interview studies in international business research.
In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research
methods for international business: 185-206. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.
De Cieri, H., & Dowling, P.J. 2006. Strategic human resource management in
multinational enterprises: Developments and directions. In G. K. Stahl & I. Björkman
(Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management: 15-35.
Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.
Doz, Y., & Prahalad C.K. 1991. Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm.
Strategic Management Journal, 12: 145-164.
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2007. World investment prospects to 2011: Foreign direct
investment and the challenge of political risk. Written with the Columbia Program on
International Investment. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.
Enns, H., & McFarlin, D.B. 2005. When executives successfully influence peers: The
role of target assessment, preparation and tactics, Human Resource Management, 44:
257-278.
Farndale, E. 2005. HR department professionalism: A comparison between the UK and
other European countries. International Journal of Human Resource Management,
16: 660-675.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. 2006. When work and family are allies: A theory of
work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31: 72-92.
Grzywacz, J.G., & Carlson, D.S. 2007. Conceptualizing work-family balance:
35
Implications for practice and managing. Advances in Developing Human Resources,
9(4): 455-471.
Haas, L. L., Hwang, P., & Russell, G. 2000. Organizational change and gender equity.
Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Heenan, D., & Perlmutter, H. 1979. Multinational organisation development. Reading,
MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hein, C. 2005. Reconciling work and family responsibilities: Practical ideas from global
experience. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Organization.
Howard, A., Liu, L., Wellins, R.S., & Williams, S. 2007. The flight of human talent
Development Dimensions International (DDI), retrieved 13 March 2008,
http://www.ddiworld.com/pdf/EmployeeRetentioninChina2007_es_ddi.pdf
Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the
multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24: 625-645.
Konrad, A., & Mangel, R. 2000. The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity.
Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1225-1237.
Korabik, K., Lero, D., & Ayman, R. 2003. A micro-macro approach to cross-cultural
work-family research. Paper presented at the European Academy of Management,
Milan, Italy.
Kossek, E.E., & Lambert, S.J. 2005. Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural
and individual perspectives. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of
multinational corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.
Kumar, N., Stern, L., & Anderson, J.C. 1993. Conducting interorganizational research
36
using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1633-1651.
Larsen, H.H., & Brewster, C. 2003. Line management responsibility for HRM: What’s
happening in Europe? Employee Relations, 25: 228-244.
Lee, T.W,, Mitchell, T.R., & Sablynski, C.J. 1999. Qualitative research in organizational
and vocational psychology. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55: 161–87.
Lewis, S., Gambles, R., & Rapoport, R. 2007. The constraints of a ‘work-life balance’
approach: An international perspective. The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 18(3): 360-373.
Marschan-Piekkari, R., Welch, C., Penttinen, H. & Tahvanainen, M. 2004. Interviewing
in the multinational corporation: Challenges of the organisational context. In R.
Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research methods for
international business: 244-263. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.
Masi, D.A., & Jacobson, J.M. 2003. Outcome measurements of an integrated
employee assistance and work-life program. Research on Social Work Practice,
13(4): 451-467.
McCampbell, A.S. 1996. Benefits achieved through alternative work schedules. Human
Resource Planning, 19(3): 31-37.
Michaels, B. 1995. A global glance at work and family. Personnel Journal, 74(4): 85-93.
Minbaeva, D. B. 2005. HRM practices and MNC knowledge transfer. Personnel Review,
34(1): 125-144.
Nishii, L.H. & Özbilgin, M.F. 2007. Global diversity management: towards a conceptual
framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(11): 1883-
1894.
37
Novicevic, M., & Harvey, M. 2001. The changing role of the corporate HR function in
global organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(8):
1251-1268.
Paauwe, J., & Boselie, P. 2005. HRM and performance: What next? Human Resource
Management Journal, 15(4): 68-83.
Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks CA:
Sage.
Perry-Smith, J., & Blum, T. 2000. Work-family human resource bundles and perceived
organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1107-1117.
Pfeffer, J. 2005. Changing mental models: HR’s most important task. Human Resource
Management, 44: 123-128.
Poelmans, S.A.Y. 2005. Organizational research on work and family: Recommendations
for future research. In S.A.Y. Poelmans (Ed.), Work and family: An international
research perspective. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Poole, M.S., & Van De Ven, A.H. 1989. Using paradox to build management and
organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14: 562-578.
Poster, W.R., & Prasad, S. 2005. Work-family relations in transnational perspective: A
view from high-tech firms in India and the United States. Social Problems, 52: 122-
146.
Rapoport, R., Lewis, S., Bailyn, L., & Gambles R. 2005. Globalization and the
integration of work with personal life. In S. A. Y. Poelmans (Ed.), Work and family:
An international research perspective: 463-484. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
38
Richards, T., & Richards, L. 1995. Using hierarchical categories in qualitative data
analysis. In U. Kelle (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory,
methods and practice: 80-95. London: Sage.
Rousseau, D. 2006. Is there such a thing as 'evidence-based management'? Academy of
Management Review, 31: 256-269.
Russell, G. 2008. Work and life in China, Boston College Center for Work & Family,
retrieved 13 March 2008 http://www.bc.edu/centers/cwf/research publications/meta-
elements/pdf/China_Policy_Paper_Final.pdf
Russell, G., & Bourke, J. 1999. Where does Australia fit in internationally with work and
family issues? Australian Bulletin of Labour, 25(3): 229-250.
Rynes, S., Bartunek, J., & Daft, R. 2001. Across the great divide: Knowledge creation
and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal,
44(2): 340-355.
Rynes, S., Giluk, T., & Brown, K. 2007. The very separate worlds of academic and
practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-
based management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 987-1008.
Sankaran, S. 2008. Retaining and developing top talent in Asia Pacific. Paper presented
at Boston College Global Workforce Roundtable: Global Summit 2008, Shanghai, 27
February.
Scullion, H., Collings, D.G., & Gunnigle, P. 2007. International human resource
management in the 21st century: emerging themes and contemporary debates.
Human Resource Management Journal, 17(4): 309–319.
Shapiro, A., & Noble, K. 2001. A work/life lens helps bring a global workforce into
39
focus. Its about time, 2 (Spring): 1-2.
Spector, P.E., Cooper, C.L., Poelmans, S.A.Y., Allen, T.D., O'Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J.I.,
Oi, L.S., Dewe, P., Hart, P., Luo, L., De Moraes, L.F.R., Ostrognay, G.M., Sparks,
K., Wong, P., & Yu, S. 2004. A cross-national comparative study of work-family
stressors, working hours, and well-being: China and Latin America versus the Anglo
world. Personnel Psychology, 57(1): 119-142.
Spinks, N. 2005. Work-life around the world: Building a global work-life strategy,
Toronto, Canada: Work-Life Harmony Enterprises.
Stohl, C., & Cheney, G. 2001. Participatory practices/paradoxical practices:
Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy’, Management
Communication Quarterly, 14: 349–407.
Stroh, L. K., & Caligiuri, P. M. 1998. Increasing global competitiveness through effective
people management. Journal of World Business, 33(1): 1-16.
Tracy, S. J. 2004. Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing
employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication
Research, 32(2): 119-146.
Trethewey, A., & Ashcraft K.L. 2004. Special issue introduction. Practicing
disorganization: The development of applied perspectives on living with tension.
Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2): 8-88.
Von Glinow, M.A., Drost, E., & Teagarden, M.B. 2002. Converging on IHRM best
practices: lessons learned from a globally distributed consortium on theory and
practice. Human Resource Management, 41(1): 123-140.
Welbourne, T. 2005. Editor-in-chief’s note. Human Resource Management, 44: 113-114.
40
FIGURE 1. Conceptual Framework for Global Work/Life Strategy in MNCs (Bardoel &
De Cieri, in press).
Business Objectives and Priorities
Strategic Development of Human Capital
Diversity Focus
Global Work/life Strategy
Culture Flexibility Dependent care
Local Influences on Work/life Strategies
High Performing Workforce
National (parent & subsidiary)
Organizational
Culture & traditions
Stakeholders Public Policies Community Infrastructure
Demography
Business Objectives and Priorities
Strategic Development of Human Capital
Diversity Focus
Global Work/life Strategy
Culture Flexibility Dependent care
Local Influences on Work/life Strategies
High Performing Workforce
National (parent & subsidiary)
Organizational
Culture & traditions
Stakeholders Public Policies Community Infrastructure
Demography
41
Global Integration Local Responsiveness Strategic/Policy Operational Headquarters Subsidiary HR Line manager Manager Employee Economic/Business Social/Ethical/Moral Contextual/Institutional Organizational Collective Individual Research Practice
FIGURE 2.
TENSIONS BETWEEN DRIVERS IN GLOBAL WORK-LIFE MANAGEMENT
42
FIGURE 3. The Global Work-life Matrix
IHRM System
IHRM roles and responsibilities for talent attraction, development, retention and management
IHRM policies and practices(global policy development, local implementation)
• Global diversity management and work-life policies and practices
• Organizational definition of work-life• Planning for work-life management:
• Flexible work policies and practices;• Availability and affordability of
dependent care;• Management of workloads and
working hours.• Resource allocation for work-life
management.• Organizational communication about
work-life issues.• Measurement and feedback on work-life
outcomes.
MNC Influences• MNC age• MNC IB experience.• MNC strategic
orientation• MNC culture• MNC strategy• MNC structure• Extent of global
integration or local responsiveness
• Resources• Management roles and
responsibilities
Global Influences• Industry characteristics• Global market factors
Local Influences• Location factors• Institutional frameworks• National/local culture• Political context• Stage of national
economic development
Outcomes
Individual• Positive employee
attitudes towards employer
• Employee engagement
• Job satisfaction• Quality of work-life
Organizational• MNC reputation in
local market• Flexibility• Knowledge sharing• Talent attraction,
development, retention and management
• MNC reputation • Organizational and
local unit performance (e.g. health and safety, financial performance)
IHRM System
IHRM roles and responsibilities for talent attraction, development, retention and management
IHRM policies and practices(global policy development, local implementation)
• Global diversity management and work-life policies and practices
• Organizational definition of work-life• Planning for work-life management:
• Flexible work policies and practices;• Availability and affordability of
dependent care;• Management of workloads and
working hours.• Resource allocation for work-life
management.• Organizational communication about
work-life issues.• Measurement and feedback on work-life
outcomes.
MNC Influences• MNC age• MNC IB experience.• MNC strategic
orientation• MNC culture• MNC strategy• MNC structure• Extent of global
integration or local responsiveness
• Resources• Management roles and
responsibilities
Global Influences• Industry characteristics• Global market factors
Local Influences• Location factors• Institutional frameworks• National/local culture• Political context• Stage of national
economic development
Outcomes
Individual• Positive employee
attitudes towards employer
• Employee engagement
• Job satisfaction• Quality of work-life
Organizational• MNC reputation in
local market• Flexibility• Knowledge sharing• Talent attraction,
development, retention and management
• MNC reputation • Organizational and
local unit performance (e.g. health and safety, financial performance)
43
TABLE 1.
COMPANY CHARACTERISTICS
Company (Main Industry)
Revenue (USD)
Employees (worldwide) Countries Headquarters Year
Founded
Information technology
91.4 billion
355,766 170 North America
1889
FinanceA 47.2 billion
81,577 >50 Europe 1998 (following merger)
FinanceB 8,336 million
27,800 26 North America
1792
Health insurance and care services
8.3 billion 46,000 192 Europe 1947
OilA 274.3 billion
115,000 >100 Europe 1908
OilB 318.9 billion
108,000 >130 Europe 1907
Transport & logistics
4.7 billion 25,061 27 Europe 1837
Manufacturing (chemicals)
$53.51 billion
46,000 >50 North America 1897
Manufacturing (food)
14.6 billion
70,000 >29 Europe 1905
Manufacturing and retail
28.6 billion
110,000 30 Europe 1945
Automotive 2.8 billion 4,322 4 Asia 1956
Mining 38,637 million
209,000 24 Europe 1917
Mining services 4.2 billion 13,348 50 Australia 1928
44
TABLE 2.
PARTICIPANT DEMOGRAPHICS
Participants by Country Australia 6 Brazil 2 China 4 Hong Kong 2 India 1 Malaysia 1 Singapore 2 Sweden 1 Vietnam 2 UK 4 USA 3
Participants by Company Information Technology 5 FinanceA 3 FinanceB 1 Health insurance and care services 2 OilA 2 OilB 4 Transport and logistics 3 Manufacturing (chemicals) 1 Manufacturing (food) 1 Manufacturing and retail 2 Automotive 1 Mining 1 Mining services 2
Participants by Position Title Diversity Manager 2 Global HR Manager 3 Group Inclusiveness Manager 1 HR Director 8 HR General Manager 1 HR Manager 6 HR Policy Manager 1 International HR Consultant 1 Manager - Work, Life, Flexibility and Mobility 1 Managing Director & Regional Head HR 1 Organisational Development Manager 1 Staffing and Workforce Diversity 1 Talent Manager 1 Vice President - Human Resources 1
45
TABLE 3.
THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIES TO RESOLVE WORK-LIFE MANAGEMENT TENSIONS
Strategy Evidence
Resolving global – local tension: Opposition
[The local unit typically says] … here is a standard we aim for, here is why we are aiming for it, put it up for debate and consideration and in some instances it will be adopted, in other instances we’ll agree to disagree, and the likely outcome of the disagree would be ‘we’ll park there, and that will be a long-term goal, and if ever comes an opportunity to move the international business closer to the head office view of the world then we’ll take it. [National HR Manager, Health insurance and care services, Australia]
Resolving global – local tension: Synergistic strategies
1. Clear policies and expectations
[Our MNC] policies are so clear, but it gives you the right to adapt. [National Diversity Manager, IT, Brazil]
2. Resourcing …it is a recognition of the business always comes first even though what we are doing will support the business, understanding the timing, timing may be a problem. We run into issues regarding cost. We run out of money. [Global Diversity Manager, IT, USA]
3. HQ respect for local knowledge
Our ideas here are very well accepted, and what comes from overseas we adapt to be effective. This is what [our MNC] wants. … we respect the concept, the idea, we adapt to the needs of each country. [National Diversity Manager, IT, Brazil]
It was a male dominated culture and we were having problems with implementing flexibility. So we started in 2001 and realised that we needed to understand and accept the culture. It wasn’t something that was going to happen in 2001. So we worked with the local team and we used their input to tell us what we could and could not do. [Global Diversity Manager, IT, USA]
4. Integrate work-life management with other HR practices
Work life balance is a very personal thing to different people. And one of the things that we want to do is to try to encourage managers to have these sorts of conversations around their kind of career development review discussions and … end of the year performance reviews, try and open up a dialogue around work life balance, to
46
see, see what you know what we can do to better accommodate this. [Diversity Manager, Finance, Hong Kong]
5. Communication, awareness and support
Actually in communications and support, employees need to know what [the MNC will] support and what the companies do not. [Global Diversity Manager, IT, USA] We have a specific dedicated website to diversity inclusion as well [Global Diversity Advisor, Oil-A, Malaysia] … in Asia, I’ve been working in the region, one of the things often people don’t understand what diversity is, you know they’re so hung up on awareness. … as an organization there are people who are different, we all need to be nurtured very differently. [Global Diversity Advisor, Oil-A, Malaysia]
6. Gathering information, Measurement and feedback
We do a lot of focus groups and we have done focus groups in the past and now we use this survey as a key information source. . [Global Diversity Manager, IT, USA] We measure based on the diversity score card and the diversity score card is now a part of our overall human resources score card. [Global Diversity Manager, IT, USA]
7. Engagement in decision-making
We believe if we make decision without people’s involvement and commitment behind the decision we can never implement that decision to the maximum level. And that’s why it’s better that we involve the people at the beginning when we are making the decision then many people are standing behind the decision, they have a high commitment level to the decision. [HR Manager, Manufacturing and retail, Sweden]
8. Building HR competencies The HR managers need to have the time and ability to coach the other managers in doing that sort of work. I guess there’s also a sort of a mindset that that’s HR work. In reality managing people is the responsibility of all managers. [National HR Manager, Transport & logistics, Australia]
9. Provide management and employee training and education
… we educate all our leaders as well. We have spent the last 2 years working with our top 1000 leaders to help them understand the cultural dimensions. [Global Diversity Advisor, Oil-A, Malaysia]
It’s pretty much across the board. I think it, clearly there needs to be the senior level endorsement. I think equally it’s education of people who wish to participate within that, you know, their role, responsibilities, the impact on the rest of the teams. … it’s broad education so I think we all probably have a role in some way or another to, you know to make it work. It’s not just the manager and the employees, it will all be a knock on effect on other
47
members within the team as well. [National HR Manager, Finance, USA]
We strongly encourage managers to be open minded and you know reward people accordingly. We support flexible work arrangements to the extent that it makes sense. And [HQ] for the last two years have been a huge push on flexible work arrangements… a lot of the managers said ‘well we’ve offered a lot of our employees flexible work arrangements but we need the bank to support us in return’. And we said ‘what do you need’ and they said ‘we need field training. Because it is a lot tougher to manage someone who is on a flex schedule than to manage someone who is in front of you’. So we’ve actually run a whole lot of workshops and training programs for managers. [Diversity Manager, Finance, Hong Kong] What we are doing now though is putting in, in place flexible work arrangement advisors… we think a more helpful strategy is to have flexible work arrangement advisors who are there to support both the employee and the managers…. Because that way we can help, you know better educate the managers of the employees so that we can find a solution that best fit for everybody. [Diversity Manager, Finance, Hong Kong]
10. Build a rapport One of the assumptions is if you have got a rapport and a relationship with your manager then you will be able to negotiate things that are, will work for both of you. [National HR Manager, Health insurance and care services, Australia]
11. Respect and accept diversity
So rather than trying to fight this doomed battle of fixing people’s personal lives we tend to focus more on their work life so that we make work place more of an attractive and joyful place so that when people spend their 8 or 10 or 12 or 14 hours in the office they actually enjoy it. [Diversity Manager, OilB, Singapore]
48
TABLE 4.
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR WORK-LIFE MANAGEMENT
Global Responsibilities:
Line Manager Responsibilities:
HR Responsibilities:
• Senior level endorsement • Engagement in decision-making • Adapt to the needs of each
country • Resourcing • Gather information (e.g. focus
groups) • Measurement and feedback
• Make work place more of an attractive and joyful place
• Management at all levels must understand, accept and support flexibility
• Have conversations with employees around career development and performance reviews, try and open up a dialogue around work life balance
• Build HR competencies: HR managers need to have the time and ability to coach line managers
• HR provide formal management training program and implement flexible work options.
• HR to communicate success stories
• Placement of flexible work arrangement advisors
• Communication and support • Provide a tool kit for employees • Develop network in HRM
community