Transcript
Page 1: Microplastics - Toxics Link

A Quick look into the MicroplAstics• Microplastics are synthetic or semi-synthetic,solid, water insoluble, high polymer plasticparticlesof asizerangebelow5mm.

• Theyarebothusedasarawmaterialforanumberof productsandproducedfromdegradationof anyplasticproduct.

• Their small size allows them to pass throughwastewatertreatmentplantsandreachtheoceansthroughsurfacewaterbodiesandrivers.

• Microplastics are non-biodegradable andpersistentinmarineandfreshwater.

Nanoplastics: Plastic particles generally of sizebelow1µmarecallednanoplastics.Theyposehigherrisktotheenvironmentbecauseof theirreducedsizewhichis1000timessmallerthananalgalcell.

types of MicroplAsticsDepending on the origin, we can differentiatebetweenprimaryandsecondarymicroplastic.

Primary microplastics are manufactured asmicrobeads, capsules,fibersorpellets.Examplesincludemicrobeadsusedincosmeticsandpersonalcareproducts,industrialscrubbersusedforabrasiveblast cleaning andmicrofibers used in textiles.Primarymicroplastic can also come from therun-off/effluentof plasticproductfabricationormanufacturingfacilities.

Secondarymicroplastics are the result of largerpieces of plastic breaking down into smallerpieces.Thisoccurswhenplasticdebrisisexposedtosunlightandtheplasticbeginstoweatherandfragment. It is generated by the fragmentationof larger plastic itemsbyUV radiation, physicalabrasion(waves,rocks),andmicrobialprocesses.

Therearesomemicroplasticswhichfallinbetween,forexamplesdustfromcarandtrucktires,synthetictextiles,ropes,paintetc.forexample,plasticdustiscreatedbythefrictionbetweenthecarwheelsandtheroadandisblownintowaterwaysbythewind.Cartiresshed20gramsof plasticdustevery100kilometers!These are inmost cases classified asprimaryowingtothefactthattheiremissionsareinherentlyaresultof humanmaterialandproductuseandnotsecondarydefragmentationinnature.

Why is of risk?• Microplastics undergo various processes of physical,enzymaticandmicrobialdegradationinnature,butdonotgetcompletelybrokendown.

• About5to14milliontonsof plasticwasteenterintotheoceaneveryyear.Averageannualglobalreleaseof primarymicroplasticsintotheoceanisestimatedtobearound1.5milliontons.

• Microplastics can absorb extremely harmfulhydrophobicorganicpollutants.

• Removal of microplastics from aquaticenvironmentisextremelydifficultasthatcouldlead to the elimination of all plankton sizeorganisms.

• Microplasticsexistinairasairbornepollutantsoriginating from the plastic textile fiberproduction.

About 5 to 14 million tons of plastic waste enter into the ocean every year. Average annual global release of primary microplastics into the ocean is estimated to be around 1.5 million tons.

Are MicrobeAds different froM MicroplAstics?Microplastics used as abrasives in personal care and cosmetic products (PCCP) are commonly known as microbeads. Mostly of spherical shape, these, are used in both leave-on lotions and rinse-off products.

Microplasticsthe Most widespread and persistent hazards of plastic

Factsheet Number 56 / April 2018

Page 2: Microplastics - Toxics Link

Toxics Link Factsheet Number 56 / April 20182

iMpActs of MicroplAstics Environment: Considered as global pollutants,microplasticspollutethewaterenvironment;changethe ecosystem, affects biodiversity by reducingspeciesdiversityandactasvectors forspreadingtoxicchemicaladditives.

Wildlife:Microplasticsareingestedbyzooplanktons,like,daphnia,aswellasseveralotherhigheraquaticspecies and bio-accumulates in the food chain.Ingestion of microplastics causes digestive tractblockage and stomach lining damage leading tostarvationof theorganism,digestionimpairmentand reduced and delayed reproductive ability,resultingintoalifespanreduction.Inaddition,thetoxins, including endocrine disrupting chemicals(EDCs), persistent organic pollutants (POPs),organochlorine pesticides, carried by thesemicroscopicplasticparticlesarecarriedoverlongdistances bywater systems and released insidetheorganisms,impactingfurther.Fromthefishesthese harmful toxins andparticles spread acrossthefood-chain.

Socio-economic: severely affected bymarineplastic pollution owing to the reduced fishpopulation,lossof incomefromtourism,damagetocoastalagriculture,etc.Directsocio-economicimpactsof microplasticsneedtoberesearchedindepth.

Human health: Humans can be exposed tomicroplasticseitherdirectlythroughcontaminatedwater and cosmetics or indirectly from seafoodconsumption.Itcanleadtobacterialinfectionsinthegum,skinor injure thecorneabysticking inthe eye.Microbeads in facialproducts can causetiny skin rips and further infection. Suspended

Occurrence of microplastic across food-chain ensures their presence in human food increasing the possibiliy of exposure of associated toxic chemicals to humans. In direct impact, microbead can lead to bacterial infections in the gum, skin or injure the cornea by sticking in the eye. In facial products, it can cause tiny skin rips.

A tap water survey analysis conducted with in samples from 5 continents (USA, Lebanon, Europe, Indonesia Uganda, India & Ecuador) found microplastics in 83% of sample from across the continents. India ranks 3rd with in 82.4% sample contaminated with microplatics

bio-degrAdAble plAstics Also produce MicroplAsticsMicroplastic and plastic concerns have lead to the development of bio-degradable plastics. However, none of these plastics are completely degradable and their degradation also is subject to high temperature which is not possible in marine environment.

the indiAn contextSadly, microplastics are less studied in India despite the country being among the major plastic consumers and producer of 5.6 million tons of plastic waste annually. Studies have found microplastics in Gujarat and Chennai coast, Mumbai beaches and Kerala lake. International studies have also found microplastics in drinking water (tap) samples from Delhi and bottled water from Mumbai, Delhi and Chennai. A National Institute of Oceanographic study (running) has found microplastics absorbed in fish tissues.

MicroplAstic in drinking WAterAnalysis of 259 bottled drinking water of 11different brands, from 19 locations in ninecountriesfoundanaverageof 325plasticparticlesforeverylitreof waterbeingsold.Inonebottle,concentrationswereashighas10,000plasticpiecesperlitreof water.Of the259bottlestested,only17were free of plastics, according to the study.There are no regulatory limits on the levels of microplasticsinbottledwater.

An estimated 5 trillion pieces of plastic currently float in the world’s oceans

The consumption of plastics and microplastics by marine animals can lead to false satiation , starvation and death.

microplasticsintheaircanbedirectlyinhaledandaffectthelungs.Occurrenceof microplasticacrossfood-chainensurestheirpresenceinhumanfoodincreasingthedirectexposureof associatedtoxicchemicalstohumanswhichagaincomewiththeirownsetsof fatefulimpacts.

Page 3: Microplastics - Toxics Link

3Microplastics - the Most Widespread and persistent Hazards of plastic

Page 4: Microplastics - Toxics Link

Toxics Link Factsheet Number 56 / April 20184

Toxics Link h2 (Ground Floor)Jungpura extensionNew Delhi 110 014T: +91-(0)11-24328006, 24320711E: [email protected]

Priti Mahesh Chief Programme Coordiantor [email protected]

Manjusha Mukherjee Program Coordinator [email protected]

for more information, please contact: research and compiled by

literAture referred• EuropeanCommission(DGEnvironment).2017.Intentionally

addedmicroplasticsinproducts.FinalReport.AmecFosterWheelerEnvironment&InfrastructureUKLimited.

• UNEP.2015.PlasticinCosmetics:Arewepollutingtheenvironmentthroughourpersonalcare?Plasticingredientsthatcontributetomarinemicroplasticlitter.

• IUCN.2017.Primarymicroplasticsintheoceans:aglobalevaluationof sources.WrittenbyBoucherJ.andFriotD.

• Rocha-SantosT.A.P.andDuarteA.C.(volumeEditors).2017.CharacterisationandAnalysisof Microplastics.Volume75InComprehensiveAnalyticalChemistry.BarceloD(SeriesEditor).Elsevier:Camridge,UnitedStates.

• ColeM.,LindequeP.,HalsbandC.,GallowayT.S.2011.Microplasticsascontaminantsinthemarineenvironment:Areview.MarinePollutionBulletin62:2588–2597

• PatelM.M.,GoyalB.R.,BhadadaS.V.,BhattJ.S.,AminA.F.2009.Gettingintothebrain:approachestoenhancebraindrugdelivery.CNSDrugs23:35–58.

• DuisK.andCoorsA.2016.Microplasticsintheaquaticandterrestrialenvironment:sources(withaspecificfocusonpersonalcareproducts),fateandeffects.EnvironmentalSciencesEurope28

• EuropeanCommission.JointResearchCentre.2013.GuidanceonMonitoringof MarineLitterinEuropeanSeas.Aguidance

regulAtions on MicroplAstics Legal restrictions on the use of microbeads incosmetic products are either posed or underprocess inanumberof countries.IntheUStheMicrobeadFreeWaterActwasintroducedin2015,whichprohibitsthemanufacturing,packaging,anddistributionof rinse-off cosmeticscontainingplasticmicrobead. Legislations on banningmicrobeadsincosmeticsare tocome inforce in2018 in theEuropeanUnionandCanada.Legislationsarealsounderprocess inSouthKoreaandNewZealandwhileAustraliahasinitiatedavoluntaryphasingout.Nolegalframeworkisinplaceforrestrictiveuseof microplasticsormicrobeadsinIndia.However,microbeadsarenotifiedas‘notrecognizedassafe’for use in cosmetic products by theBureau of IndianStandards(BIS)inIndia.

documentwithintheCommonImplementationStrategyfortheMarineStrategyFrameworkDirectiveMSFDTechnicalSubgrouponMarineLitter.JRCScientificandPolicyReports.

• https://web.unep.org/frontiers/sites/unep.org.frontiers/files/documents/unep_frontiers_2016.pdf

• GESAMP.2015.Sources,fateandeffectsof microplasticsinthemarineenvironment:aglobalassessment(Kershaw,P.J.,ed.).

• ORBMedia.2017.Invisibles.https://orbmedia.org/stories/Invisibles_final_report

• CostaJ.P.,SantosP.S.M.,DuarteA.C.andSantosT.R.2016.(Nano)plasticsintheenvironment–sources,fatesandeffects.Scienceof TheTotalEnvironment.566-567:15-26.

• GasperiJ.etal.2018.Microplasticsinair:arewebreathingitin?CurrentOpinioninEnviornmentalScience&Health.1:1-5.

• UNEP.2016.Microplastics:trouleinthefoodchain.UNEPFrontTires2016Report.

• ORBMedia.2018.PlusPlastic:Microplasticsfoundinglobalbottledwater.WrittenbyTyreeC.andMorrisonD.

• RamasamyE.V.2016.Microplastics:AnEmergingcontaminant-withpotentialthreattoaquaticsystems-lessstudiedinIndia.PresentedIn:Lake2016:ConferenceonConservationandSustainableManagementof EcologicallySensitiveRegionsinWesternGhats.

A tube of face wash can contain over 330000 micro beads!

Plastic straws, drink stirrers and cotton swabs could be banned in England under plans proposed by the UK government to reduce plastic waste and protect the world’s oceans.

Meanwhile, consumers can limit their personal contributions to microplastic pollution by avoiding products that contain microbeads, choosing clothing made from natural fibers, avoid single use plastic products and taking care not to litter or flush plastic materials down the drain

conclusionMicroplastic is a global environmental problemwhichhasthepowertothreatenmarinelifeaswellasfreshwaterorganisms for decades and centuries, and thepotentialtopoisontheentirefoodchain.Though it needs global research, policy andtechnological change to decontaminate theenvironmentfrommicroplasticpollution,however,we can always take action to minimize thecontribution.


Top Related