Transcript
Page 1: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Case StudyPhil Brown20th September 2012

Page 2: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Case Study: Working with the Revision for General and Active Implantable Medical

Devices

Phil Brown10th September 2012

Page 3: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Evolution rather than Revolution?

• Revisions as a result of MDD update• Revisions as a result of PIP / MoM issues• Impacts• Challenges and mitigation steps• Opportunities

Page 4: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

• MDD Update―Transparency (awareness of products and process)―Centralization? ―Commission to scrutinize NB Class III assessments,

Pre-Market Approval?―Reprocessing of ‘Single Use Devices’―Designation and Supervision of Notified Bodies―More emphasis on Post Marketing Surveillance―Control over Economic Operators―UDI―Qualified Persons?

Page 5: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

• ‘PIP’ / MoM Update– To reinforce greater post market

surveillance• Adverse Event Reporting• Potential use of Registries• Audit of PMS plans / formalise PMS structures

– Focus on NB audits• Competent Authority scrutiny of NBs• Company scrutiny by NBs• Unannounced auditing by NBs

– UK Lead?

Page 6: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Consider the impact on the manufacturer and how to work with

the (proposed) ‘Revisions’

Page 7: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Five main areas of change;

1. Pre-Market requirements2. Post-Market requirements3. Labelling4. Distribution channels5. Costs

Page 8: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Pre-Market Requirements

– Technical Requirement change?– Increased Notified Body influence?– More Conformity Assessment scrutiny– Innovation– Commission Scrutiny / PMA?– Time to market

Page 9: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Post-Market Requirements

– Post Marketing Surveillance improvements– Registries– Audits, planned and un-announced– Greater integration of QA and RA– Qualified Person responsibilities– Third Party Reprocessing of products?

Page 10: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Labelling

– Consideration of UDI

– Third Party information

Page 11: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Distribution channels

– More control over Third Parties– More Third Party scrutiny– Legal input into contracts– Auditing - integration of QA/RA functions– Third Party responsibilities

Page 12: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Costs

― Relating to Post Marketing Surveillance― Auditing and control of Third Parties― Notified Body costs― UDI / labelling― Class III costs for scrutiny― Re processing issues?

Page 13: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Conclusions

– Fundamental ‘New Approach’ principles remain– Aimed at boosting patient and end-user

confidence– MDD in need of modernising– Anticipating next 10/15 years– To lead to increased costs?– Slow progress to more Pharma style

regulation?

Page 14: Medical Device Revisions Case Study Phil Brown 20th September 2012

Medical Device Revisions

Phil [email protected]

07810 484025


Top Related