Lecture notesPrepared by Anton
Ljutic
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Imperfect Competition
CHAPTER ELEVEN
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
This Chapter Will Enable You to:
• Understand the importance and effects of product differentiation
• Argue the pros and cons of advertising• Understand the differences between two types of
imperfect competition• Explain why monopolistically-competitive firms
tend to have excess capacity and are unlikely to earn long-run economic profits
• Understand why oligopoly firms often do not engage in competitive pricing
• Understand why large firms are often tempted to collude and form cartels
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Imperfect Competition
• A market structure in which producers are identifiable and have some control over price
• Product differentiation - the attempt by a firm to distinguish its product from that of its competitors by:– Developing a recognized brand name, product logo, or
packaging– Securing a superior location or developing a reputation
for exceptional service– Engaging in product redevelopment and improvement– Developing an effective advertising strategy
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Benefits of Advertising
• Provides the consumer with vital information
• Enhances competition between firms
• Lowers the price of products
• Finances magazines and television shows
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Critiques of Advertising
• It is mostly non-informative and wasteful
• Encourages concentration within industries
• Raises prices to the detriment of the consumer
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Two Types of Market Structures
• Monopolistic competition– A market in which there are many firms who sell a
differentiated product and have some control over the price of the products they sell
• Oligopoly– A market dominated by a few large firms
• Concentration ratios– A measurement of the percentage of an industry’s total
sales that is controlled by the largest few firms
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
• Many small firms
• Freedom of entry
• Some control over price
• Differentiated products
Monopolistic Competition
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Costs,revenue
Quantity
MR
D
AC
MC
Economicprofit
•Equilibrium is whereMR = MC •Price = P1and Q = Q1• Total profitis:(P1 – AC) x Q1.
•Equilibrium is whereMR = MC •Price = P1and Q = Q1• Total profitis:(P1 – AC) x Q1.
Q1
Monopolistically Competitive Firm in Short-Run Equilibrium
P1
C1
Figure 11.2
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Costs,revenue
Quantity
MR
D
AC
MC•Equilibrium is whereMR = MC •Price = P2and Q = Q1• Total Revenue = Total Cost and there are no economic profits
•Equilibrium is whereMR = MC •Price = P2and Q = Q1• Total Revenue = Total Cost and there are no economic profits
Q1
The Long-Run Equilibrium for the Firm
P2
Figure 11.3
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Costs,revenue
Quantity
MR
D
ACMC
•Equilibrium is whereMR = MC •Price = P2and Q = Q3• Total Revenue < Total Cost and there are economic losses
•Equilibrium is whereMR = MC •Price = P2and Q = Q3• Total Revenue < Total Cost and there are economic losses
Q3
The Effect of Too Much Entry
P2
Figure 11.3
C3
Economicloss
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Costs,revenue
MR2
D2
ACMC
QMC
Excess Capacity
PPC
Figure 11.3
PMC ab
cD1=MR1
QPC
Excess
•Long-run equilibrium for a perfectly comp. firm is a•For a monopolistically comp. firm it is b
•Long-run equilibrium for a perfectly comp. firm is a•For a monopolistically comp. firm it is b
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Advantages to Franchising
• Bulk purchasing
• National advertising
• Brand identification
• It allows individuals to own their own business without having to accumulate the large sums of money it would take to get started on a national level
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Characteristics of Oligopoly Industry
• It is dominated by a few large firms• Entry by new firms is difficult• Non-price competition between firms is widely
practiced• Each firm has significant control over its price• Mutual interdependence exists between firms
– Mutual interdependence: The condition in which a firm’s action depends on part, on the reactions of rival firms
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Advantages of Collusion
• It reduces the intensity of competition
• It enhances the profitability of firms
• It greatly reduces the risks and uncertainty firms face
• Colluding firms are better able to block any possible entry by new firms
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
The Cartel
• It is a formal agreement of cooperation among firms
• It assumes the presence of collusion• It is illegal in Canada and in the United States• OPEC is a classic example of a cartel• Cartels work to the advantage of their members
only if there is no cheating between the participants
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
OPEC’s Effects on World Oil Market
S2
S1
P
D
Q
$2
$8
3024
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Price Leadership
• To avoid price wars, firms often practice price leadership
• Firms in an industry concede the role of price leader to a single firm, usually the largest or most efficient firm
• The leader then monitors its cost and revenue with the long view in mind
• When conditions change sufficiently that a price increase seems urgent, the leader will balance the advantages of a large increase with the risks of new entry into the industry
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
The Kinked Demand Curve
Price
Quantity
D
P1
Q1
•If this firm increases price, rivals will not follow, resulting in an elastic demand above the prevailing price.
•If this firm decreases price, rivals will follow, resulting in an inelastic demand below the prevailing price.
•If this firm increases price, rivals will not follow, resulting in an elastic demand above the prevailing price.
•If this firm decreases price, rivals will follow, resulting in an inelastic demand below the prevailing price.
Elastic D
Inelastic D
Figure 11.8
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Kinked Demand and Marginal Revenue
Price
Quantity
D
P1
Q1
•The discontinuity in the MR curve is the result of the kink in the demand curve. •An increase in MC to MC2 results in no change in equilibrium price or quantity.
•The discontinuity in the MR curve is the result of the kink in the demand curve. •An increase in MC to MC2 results in no change in equilibrium price or quantity.
MR
MC1
MC2
Figure 11.9
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Are Oligopolies Efficient?
• There is no agreement in this area
• Some believe that oligopolies are too powerful and produce inefficiently
• Others take the view that oligopolies are at the cutting edge of new technology development and, in the long-run, push the average costs of production down
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Pricing Strategies for Firms with Market Power (I)
• Peak-load pricing– the seller charges a higher price when demand for its
product peaks, and a lower price at other times
• Inter-temporal price discrimination– consumers are separated into different groups with
different elasticities of demand– those with lower elasticities are sold first, at higher
price– some time later the price is reduced in order to appeal
to those with higher demand elasticities
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Pricing Strategies for Firms with Market Power (II)
• Two-part tariff– an up-front fee for the right to buy a product is charged
• Mixed bundling– restaurant owners usually bundle certain products for a
specific price
• Coupons and rebates– sellers of products offer more price sensitive customers
a lower price than those who simply can’t be bothered with clipping the coupons or mailing in the rebate requests
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Are Firms Profit Maximizers?
• J.K.Galbraith: when management and ownership are divorced, profit-maximization not the only objective
• Other possible objectives:– Obtaining autonomy of decision-making– Developing state-of-the-art technology– High rates of growth– Social goals
© 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
Chapter Summary: What to Study and Remember
• the importance and effects of product differentiation
• the pros and cons of advertising• the differences between two types of imperfect
competition• why monopolistically-competitive firms tend to
have excess capacity and are unlikely to earn long-run economic profits
• why oligopoly firms often do not engage in competitive pricing
• why large firms are often tempted to collude and form cartels