-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
1/51
and Concrete Structures
Chiew Sing-Pingv v
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
12 J uly 2013
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
2/51
Scope of Presentation
M t ri l
Com osite columns
Composite beams Composite slabs
2
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
3/51
Design Codes for Composite Structures
Effective 1 st April 2015: Till 31 st March 2015:
Eurocode 1- for loadings
BS 6399- for loadings
- - for concrete properties and some
of the concrete related checks- for construction stage, design of pure
beam(such as longitudinal shear)
Eurocode 3 (many Parts)BS 5950-6- for design of profiled steel sheeting
- ,pure steel beam and profiled steelsheeting
- .- for design of composite beamBS5950-4
Eurocode 4 Part 1-1- general rules of buildings - for design of composite slabBS 5400-5-
- for the structural fire design-BS 5950-8
- for structural fire desi n
3
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
4/51
Design Safety Factors
Eurocodes British Standards
Load safet factors 1.35 G + 1.5 1.4 G + 1.6 BS5950 1.2 G k + 1.5 Q k (BS5400-5)
Material
Structural steel 1.0 1.0 (BS5950)
1.05 (BS5400-5)sa etyfactors
Concrete 1.5 1.5
Reinforcement 1.15 1.15
4
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
5/51
Material Strength
Concrete and steel strengths in EC4 and BS5950
BS5950 EC4
ConcreteNormal C30 C50 C20/25 C60/75
Structural steel 355 N/mm 2 460 N/mm 2
Cube strength Cylinder strength / Cube strength
The ranges are narrower compared to EC2 (C12/15 C90/105) and EC32
composite members with very high concrete and steel strengths.
5
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
6/51
Concrete Strength
One of the most noticeable differences in Eurocodes is the wayconcre e s reng s spec e roug ou .
the cube strength f cu is used.
,the cylinder strength f ck is used.
6
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
7/51
BS
Cube strength2
Will differentstrength gives Converting from
the concrete
resistance ? strength toequivalent plastic
Cylinder strength
20 N/mm 2
. cu . .
= = 2
No difference!7
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
8/51
Steel Strength
EC3 has additional ductility requirements compared toBS5950 in terms of stress ratio, elongation and strainratio.
Normal strength steel high strength steel
f u/f y 1.10
f u/f y 1.05 (EC3-1-12)
f /f 1.10 UK NA to EC3-1-12 less than 15%
Elongation at failure not less than
10%u y y
stain u 15 y
8
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
9/51
ProblemSome product standards only have requirements on the nominal yieldand tensile strengths, or their minimum values. The stress ratio calculatedaccor ng to t ese nomna va ues cannot comp y w t t e uct tyrequirement.
Standard Grade omna y estrength (MPa) omna ens estrength (MPa) Stress ratio
AS 1397.
G550 550 550 1.00
AS 1595 CA 500 500 510 1.02
EN 10326 S550GD 550 560 1.02
ISO 4997 CH550 550 550 1.00
AS 1397: Steel sheet and strip hot-dip zinc-coated or aluminium/zinc-coatedAS 1595: Cold-rolled, unalloyed, steel sheet and strip
-ISO 4997: Cold-reduced carbon steel sheet of structural quality
9
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
10/51
Profiled Steel Sheeting
Most types of profiled steel sheeting are manufactured from.
10
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
11/51
Headed Stud Shear Connector
In BS 5950, the resistances of headed studs in solid slabare given for various combinations of height, diameter andconcrete strength but the physics behind these numbers are
not explained.
n , e res s ance s expresse n wo equa onsgoverned by the strength of concrete and steel.
11
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
12/51
Characteristic Resistance Q k of Headed Studs inNormal Concrete (BS 5950-3.1 Table 5)
mens ons o ea e s u s ear connectors
arac er s c s reng oconcrete (f cu )
Nominal shank Nominal As-welded diameter
(mm)
height(mm)
height(mm)
N/mm 2 N/mm 2 N/mm 2 N/mm 2
25 100 95 146 154 161 168
22 100 95 119 126 132 13919 100 95 95 100 104 109
16 75 70 70 74 78 82
13 65 60 44 47 49 52
12
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
13/51
Design Resistance of Headed Studs in Solidoncre e a
shown here as (1) and (2).
2u
Rd V
0.8 4 f d P
= (1)
2
ck cm0.29 d f E = = schV
.d
The two equations represent the 2 possible failure modes:i failure in the shank of headed stud and ii failure in concrete.
13
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
14/51
steel failure
Failure in the headed stud
- concretecrushes
14Failure in concrete
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
15/51
Comparison of Characteristic Resistances invar ous es gn o es
arac er s c res s ance o s ear s u , RkHeaded shear studs embedded Characteristic strength of concrete (N/mm 2)
n so concre e s a onormal weight concrete 25 30 35 40
: ar :
BS5950: Part 3.1: 2010 95 100 104 109EC4: Part 1.1: 2004 81.0 92.1 100.6 102.1
o es: omna s an ame er = mm
Nominal height = 100mm while as-welded height = 95mm
.
15
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
16/51
Characteristic Resistance of Stud (EC4 and BS5950)
160
120
140BS (d=22mm, h=100mm)EC (d=22mm, h=100mm)
100 BS (d=19mm,h=100mm)EC (d=19mm, h=100mm)BS ( d=16mm, h=75mm) ( k
N )
60
EC (d=16mm, h=75mm) P
R k
40
0
Concrete strength (N/mm 2)
16
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
17/51
In general, the resistance of headed stud shear connectorsdetermined by EC4 is lowe than BS5950.
more headed studs are needed in EC4 design !
17
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
18/51
Design Resistance of Headed Studs inompos e a
The design resistance of headed stud connector in compositeslab with profiled steel sheeting is more complex than in a solidslab. It is influenced by the following factors:
The direction of the ribs relative to direction of span of thecom osite beam;
The mean breadth b0 and depth hp of profiled steel sheeting;
The diamete d and height h sc of the headed shea stud;
The numbe n of the headed studs in one trou h;
Whether or not a headed stud is central within a trough.
18
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
19/51
Reduction Factor k
Design shear resistance is taken as the resistance in a solid slabt
b 0 b 0
s c c
h p
p /
2
h P
h
sc07.0 hb maxt,
p pr
t
hhn
- . . . -and 0.63 and 0.34 for open trough profiles
For the EC4 these values are about 17% lower than the BS for re-entrant profiles, but about 40% higher than the BS for open trough profiles.19
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
20/51
Upper Limit k t,max for the Reduction Factor k tGenerally, most profiled sheet sheeting is designed such that their limitingvalue dominates , so the reduction factor is independent of the geometr
EC4 BS 5950-3.1
steelsheeting
connectors per
trough
of sheet
(mm)Stud not exceeding20mm in diameter and
welded through
Stud notexceeding19mm in
profiled steel sheeting diameter
- n r=11.0 0.85
1.0 trough
. .
n r=21.0>1.0
0.700.8 0.8
Opentrough
nr=1 .
>1.0
.
1.00.82
= 1.0 0.70> . .
For open trough profiles , the reduction factor in EC4 BS5950or re-en ran roug pro es , e re uc on ac or n
20
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
21/51
Characteristic resistance of shear stud P kN
Headed shear studs incom osite slab with rofiled
Characteristic strength of concrete f cu(N/mm 2)
steel sheeting 25 30 35 40
BS5950: Part 3:2010
e-en ran
Open trough 77.9 82 85.3 89.4
EC4: Part 1.1: 2004 68.9 75.5 85.5 86.8
n =1
Notes: Nominal shank diameter = 19mmNominal height = 100mm while as-welded height = 95mm
The resistance of shear stud in composite slab determined in EC4 is upto 27% lower than that given in BS 5950.
21
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
22/51
Top-Down Construction
piles installed during the foundation stage
22
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
23/51
Installation of a kingpost into the barrette pile
23
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
24/51
KingPost in column
bars
24Casting column head
C l i h
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
25/51
Column Design ApproachCross section resistance (yielding)
Resistance to com ression Resistance to momentReduced moment resistance under com ressive force i.e. interaction between compression and bending
Member bucklin resistance Axial buckling resistance
interaction between compression and bending
LBAF cr
Types of elastic analysisand design
25 e
Si lifi d M h d (EC4 Cl 6 7 3 4)
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
26/51
Simplified Method (EC4 Clause 6.7.3.4)
Desi n Conce ts
Design based on the
Axial(similar to pure steel column)
Design based on second-order
analysis with equivalent member e 0mper ec on s mp e me o
member incombined Design based on second orderanalysis with equivalent membe
and bending Imperfection (simplified method)e 0
26
A i l C i R i
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
27/51
Axial Compression Resistance
Compression resistance of composite column
A A A N ++= ssccya p ,
= + +
steel concrete reinforcement
yk a ck c/ f sk s/ f
27
A i l B kli R i t
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
28/51
Axial Buckling Resistance
N .
Rd pl, N
The buckling reduction factorEC3 a roach Plastic resistance
0.1
12 =
a1.0
x Euler buckling-+
( ) 22.0-15.0 ++= c
Rk pl, N = 0.0 1.0 2.0cr
28
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
29/51
Bucklin Curve - EC3
29
B kli C EC4
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
30/51
Buckling Curve EC4
Cross-section Limits Axis of Buckling curveuc ng S235 - S460
Concrete encased sectiony-y b
z-z c
Partially concrete encased y-y b
z-z c
Concrete filled circular and s 3% any a
s
For steel column, the buckling curve is related to steel section and steelstrength.
For composite column, the buckling curve is related to the cross-section..
30
Example Comparison of Design Approach
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
31/51
Example - Comparison of Design Approach
Design based on Design based on seconduc ng
curve
equivalent member
imperfection
Ed
Buckling curve bMember L/200 e
Resistance of
axial N = 4320 kN N = 4108 kNcompression
Comparison 1.05Rd(X) Rd(e0) Ed
Note: design based on the use of member imperfection e 0 leads to
the EC3 buckling curve approach.Design data:
31
f y=355N/mm 2, f ck =25N/mm 2, f sk =500N/mm 2,Cross-section: 350mm 350mm, steel section: 254 254 UC73.Column length: 5.0m, 4 bars of 20mm diameter
Example Comparison of Design Approach
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
32/51
Example - Comparison of Design Approach
Design based on the EC3 Design based on second order analysisbuckling curve approach with equivalent member imperfection
approachRd N Rd e N
Rd( ) pl,Rd = N N N0Ed,max Rd(e ) 0= k N e
The maximum resistance can be0.1
-
122
+
=
Npl,RdEd,max M pl,Rd M
( ) 22.0-15.0 ++= 0Rd(e ) 0 M pl,Rd =kN e M Rd(e0)
Npm,Rd
cr
Rk pl,
N N =
0 pl,Rd Rd (e )
pl,Rd pm,Rd
-= -
N N
N N M
Second order effect factor k:2
ef,II( )
=
EI
Mpl,Rd Mpl,Rd
1=k Easier approach !
32
cr,e 2cr L0Rd(e ) cr,eff -
Resistance of Members in combined
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
33/51
ompress on an en ng The EC3 bucklin curve a roach can be ado ted focomposite column under axial compression, however, thisapproach is not suitable fo composite column subjected to
axial compression and bending moment.
In design of slender RC column, an accidental eccentricity of
the axial load in the column is introduced to calculate themaximum moment at mid-height of the column.
Simila to slende RC column, equivalent initial bowimperfections (member imperfections) are used in the design of compos e co umn o s mp ca on.
33
Bending Moment due to Member Imperfection
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
34/51
Bending Moment due to Member Imperfection
NEd 0
design axial load NEd on a composite column,.
The design bending moment for the compositee 0 co umn engt cons ere ot secon -or e
effects of end moment and imperfection is given
0Ed 2Ed 1Ed.max e N k M k M +=
NEd k1, k 2 are the factors of second order effects
Ed cr,eff
=1- /
k N N
re a e o en momen ra o
34
Member Imperfections for Composite Column
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
35/51
p p
Cross-sectionAxis of
bucklingBuckling
curveMember
imperfection (e )Concrete encased section y-y b L/200
-y
Partially concrete encasedSection
y-y b L/200z
z-z c L/150
Circular and rectangular y-y a L/300
z
o ow sec onz-z b L/200
Circular hollow section with
zy
additional I-section
-
z-z b L/200zy
Partially encased H sectionwith crossed H section
any b L/200y
35
Improvement in the Design of Column in
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
36/51
p gom ne ompress on an en ng
Compared to EC4 (1994), the simplified method for
second order analysis and equivalent member (initial bow)im erfection which takes into account the effects of residualstresses and geometrical imperfections.
method for composite columns, the scope of the simplified.
36
Ed M 1 Edk M
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
37/51
Ed 1 Ed pl,Rd
The influence of imperfection is takeninto account indirectly in the interaction
. d relevant amount to account for themoment due to the member
(a) EC4: 1994 imperfection.
Ed, max M 1 Ed 2 Ed 0k M k N e+d pl,Rd
The member im erfection can be takeninto account in the global analysis andhence it is not necessary to allow for
37e mper ec on n e ana ys s o e
interaction curve.(b) EC4: 2004
Design of Composite Beam
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
38/51
Design of Composite Beam
Nc,f
p
The concrete slab works best in com ression while the steel section
,
works best in tension; hence, a large moment resistance is generatedas a force couple.
Resistance mobilization in both the concrete slab and the steel sectionis limited b the shear connection alon the concrete interface.
38
Failure Modes of Composite Beam
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
39/51
p
IV
IV
I-I resistance to sagging moment and vertical shearII-II resistance to hogging moment and shear and M-V interactionIII-III shear connection @ the steel concrete interfaceIV-IV lateral torsional buckling
- ong u na s ear o e concre e ange
39
Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
40/51
g
In BS5950-3.1, no equation is provided to calculate thelateral torsional buckling resistance of continuous compositebeam under hogging moment over the internal support.
When checking LTB, the methods given in BS5950-1.
,with steel beam in EC3.
40
BS5950-3.1 EC4
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
41/51
b b x p S =
Rd LTRd b, =1=
Where pb is determined by TB With:
2
LT LT LT + TB t t
0.5
LTcr M
=( ) ( )
st 2 2
s
4 /=
1+ 2 / +0.05 /
a hv
a h x ( ) ( )2 2cr c 4 a at s a afz/ / M k C L G I k L E I = + (EC4)
0.522
cr 1 2 2+w cr T z
cr z z
M C L I EI
=
(EC3)
EC4 EC3 BS5950-3.1 EC4 /BSRatioEC4/EC3
Ratio
41a era - ors ona
buckling 546 kNm 531 kNm 479 kNm 1.14 1.03
Elastic Critical Moment
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
42/51
Inverted- U frame ABCD resisting lateral-torsional buckling
, cr so-called continuous inverted U-frame model.
The model iven in EC4 takes into account the lateral dis lacement of thebottom flange causing bending of the steel web and the rotation of the topflange that is resisted by bending of the concrete slab.
( ) ( )1/2
2 2cr c 4 a at s a afz/ / M k C L G I k L E I = +
42
Composite Slab
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
43/51
p
TrapezoidalOpen Trough (Trapezoidal)
Re-entrant
Possible modes of failure:
Moment failure near mid-span regionDebonding within longitudinal shear span along the interface between
43
concrete slab and decking, i.e. shear bond ailure critical
Longitudinal Shear
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
44/51
g
How reliable is the shear bond alon the interface between
concrete and profiled sheeting ?
- non ductile failure, hence not so reliable.
Mechanical interlocking due to indentations or
- ductile failure with rational provision, hence morereliable.
44
Longitudinal Shear
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
45/51
End slip
es se up
45
m-k Method
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
46/51
BS5950-4:
p pbd mAV k = +
r ps ss r cu
m A B d V k f
= + Concretestren th,vs s
bL
s v.
m= 163.26
m= 172.45k= 0.2491
k= 0.0312
46
Comparison of Longitudinal Shear
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
47/51
EC4 BS5950-4Short span Long span Short span Long span
. .
k 0.2491 0.0312
-resistance
V (kN)
79.3 60.1 74.3 56.2
,
Test Short span 81.2 kN Long span 61.6 kN
BS5950 provides a more conservative value for longitudinal shear resistance
47
Vertical Shear
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
48/51
BS 5950-4 EC4
1/3
v,Rd Rd,c 1 ck 1 pc w p
v Rd min min 1 c wV v k b d = +
v b s c
1/3 1/31/4s cu1000.79 400=
A f c
m v 25b d d 3/ 2 1/2min ck 0.035v k f =
BS 5950-4 EC4 Experiment
153.6 kN107.8 kN118.7kN
EC4 provides a more conservative value for vertical shear resistance
48
Punching Shear
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
49/51
BS 5950-4 EC4
( ) p s p cCritical perimeter -V D D v= p,Rd p p Rd V C d v=1/3
1/31/4s cu
c1000.79 400=
25 A f v
b d d 3/ 2 1/20.035v k =
Rd Rd,c 1 ck min100v C k f v = m n c
( ) ( ) p c p f p f p c2 2 2 2 2 2 2C h b h a h d h = + + + + + ( ) ( )s p sCritical perimeter = 4 - +4 +4 length of load area D D d
BS 5950-4 EC4 Experiment
186 kN139 kN108kN
-
49
Conclusions
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
50/51
1. Composite members with high strength steel and concreteou s e e scope o .2. Common grades of profiled steel sheeting cannot meet
,downgraded.
.generally lower in EC4 compared to BS5950; Important to
.4. For composite columns, the EC4 buckling curves are
.
However, unlike EC3, no special consideration for
50
Conclusions
-
7/27/2019 Lecture 2 by Chiew Sing Ping FOR CIVIL AND STRUCTURE
51/51
5. The simplified design approach using second orderanalysis and equivalent membe imperfection without anyneed for member buckling resistance check is mucheas e o compos e co umn n com ne compress onand bending moment.
. prov es gu ance o a era - ors ona uc ng c ecfor continuous composite beams taking into account the
.7. EC4 also provides clear guidance for prototype testing
profiled steel sheeting.
51