Lead Isotope Geochemistry:A Brave New World?
Graham R CarrCSIRO Exploration and MiningJune 2013
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Outline• Traditional Use of Pb Isotopes in Metallogenic
Studies• Exploration Geochemistry –
• General Principles• Gossans and Residual Soils• Groundwaters• Partial Extractions of soils• Vegetation• U exploration
• The brave new world -• The cost factor – can the commercial labs do better?• The confidence factor – will companies use isotopes?
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb Isotopes in Metallogenic Studies(Plumbotectonics)
• History of the Earth According to my favorite element – Pb.• Really a history of the fractionation of Pb, Th and U in the mantle
and crust through geological time. • The key information that Pb isotopes provide are:
– Relative contributions of mantle-derived and crustal-derived Pb in rocks and ores
– Any evidence of U/Th fractionation as a result of high grade metamorphism or the formation U enriched hydrothermal fluids.
– Model age
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb IsotopesThesis:• In any geological terrain, mineralisation
associated with a major hydrothermal event will have distinctive Pb isotope ratios that can be discriminated from minor mineralisation and from Pb derived from background rocks.
• The General Exploration problem is – can we measure and interpret these fingerprints in common regolith geochemical samples – rocks, soils, vegetation, groundwater?
Pb Isotope Variables
• Basic Equation:
206Pb/204Pb =206Pb/204Pbi + 238U /204Pb(et - 1)Source Rock
Chemistry
Time
The Growth Curve Concept
Simple (unrealistic) Single Stage Model
•Growth Curve: Co-variation through geological time of a pair of Pb isotope ratios assuming a common, U/Pb ()
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.08.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
Salt Creek (Archaean)HYC (Proterozoic)Woodlawn (Palaeozoic)
Primordial Pb
3 2 1 04 Ga
34th International Geological Congress, Brisbane, August 2012
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.08.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
Salt Creek (Archaean)HYC (Proterozoic)Woodlawn (Palaeozoic)
Primordial Pb
Stage 1
Stage 23.7 Ga
3 Ga 2 1 0
More realistic Two-Stage Model
The Growth Curve Concept
34th International Geological Congress, Brisbane, August 2012
Pb/ Pb206 204
207
204
Pb/
Pb
16.00 16.11 16.22 16.33 16.44 16.5515.38
15.42
15.46
15.50
15.54Analytical Precision
HYC Orebodies DS - 3Century DSMount Isa Pb/ Zn DSCannington Pop 2 DSCannington Pop 1 DS
1600 Ma1700 Ma
1500 Ma
1500 Ma
1400 Ma
1300 Ma
WFB CurveWFB Curve
EFB CurveEFB Curve
CummingCumming and Richards Curve and Richards Curve
The Mount Isa Growth Curves
Mount Isa Template
1700
Ma
1500
Ma
1600
Ma
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.515.38
15.42
15.46
15.50
15.54Analytical Precision
Urquhart ShaleSyn Sedimentary
Lady Loretta FormationSyn Sedimentary
Lawn Hill FormationSyn Sedimentary
Isan Orogeny Century - Lady Loretta
Isan Orogeny Lawn Hill Vein
Soldiers Cap – Cannington Event
Soldiers Cap – Dugald River Event
Mount Isa Orogeny Events (EFB)Mount Isa Orogeny Cu – Event (WFB)
HYC Syn Sed. Event
CODES Masters 2013
Relating Ores to Tectonics1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
1650
1700
Urq
uhar
t S
hale
Lady
Lore
tta
Fm.-m
ax
Lady
Lore
tta F
m.-
min D
1
Law
n Hi
ll F
m.
D2
D3
Urq
uhar
t S
hale
Syn
-sed
.
Lady
Lore
tta S
yn-s
ed.
Law
n Hi
ll S
yn-s
ed.
Early
Isan
LL-C
entu
ry
Isan
WFB
Cu
Late
Isan
Law
n Hi
ll Ve
in
Age
Ma
Depositional/TectonicAge
Hydrothermal Age
Western Fold Belt
CODES Masters 2013
“Other” Deposits
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
16.10 16.25 16.40 16.5515.45
15.47
15.49
15.51
15.53
15.55 Analytical Precision
1500 Ma
1600 Ma
15.53
15.55 Analytical Precision
1500 Ma
1600 Ma
Grevillea
Walford Creek
Kamarga
Different fluids and different source rocks, or…..a small subset of the same source rocks.
• Large, outcropping gossan in Lower Proterozoic rocks of the Mount Isa Western Fold Belt
• Geochemically highly anomalous with % Zn and Pb
Exploration Prospect – Mount Isa
Freytags Gossan IR
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.015.4
15.5
15.6
15.7
15.8
15.9 Analytical Precision
Freytags Gossan IR
500 Ma
1000 Ma
1500 Ma
Proterozoic Fields
Is it worth drilling??
What is its origin?
CODES Masters 2013
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb Isotopes in Regolith Materials
• Have greatest value in :– discriminating and eliminating the “False Positive”
geochemical anomaly– Having greater sensitivity than absolute abundance data in
detecting metal derived from a hidden/buried ore source
• Greatest inhibitors to use:– Cost– Anthropogenic contamination
The Two Dimensions of Pb
ISOTOPES
Conventional use of Pb isotope discrimination
High Probability!
False Positive
LowProbability
Concentration Threshold
BackgroundPopulation
Anomalous Population
CON
CEN
TRAT
ION
Isotope TargetSignature
IsotopeBackground
Isotope Mixing
The nextGeochemicalFrontier?Very Subtle Anomaly
SMEDG 26 June 2013
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Outcrop Shallow basement
Basement depth <500m
Basement depth 500m to 1000m
Basement depth > 1000m
The Problem is Cover
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb Isotopes in Exploration Through Cover
• Problem – detect and discriminate subtle geochemical signals above buried ore systems
• Regolith materials that can be used for geochemistry:– Soils – partial extraction geochemistry– Vegetation– Groundwater
• Pb isotopes can be used to discriminate “anomalous” from “background” in each of these media – also detect anthropogenic contamination.
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb Isotopes in Exploration Through Cover
• Partial extraction techniques to determine soil metal concentration are commonly used – but the jury is out on their applicability
• Pb isotopes are potentially a valuable discriminator to assess partial extraction anomalies
• The technique is based on the ability of isotopes to measure the proportion of end member components with distinctive Pb isotope fingerprints in a mixed system.
CODES MASTERS 2013
Pb Mixing Model
Target (T)
Isot
ope
Ratio
1
Isotope Ratio 2
Background (B)
GeochemicalSample (S)
Signature
0.75
0.25
0.5
1.0
0
Sig = 0.3+
CBRS RT x RB x CT CB +CT CB +
CT=
Can be applied to any regolith sample – rock, soil, groundwater, vegetation.
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb In Soils – The Pb Soil Model - 1
• The possible sources of Pb in a regolith sample are:– Crystallization Pb – that is, Pb incorporated in the
primary mineral lattice at the time of formation– Radiogenic Pb – Pb that have derived from the decay
of U and Th in the period since crystallisation– Regolith Pb – labile Pb that has been transported to
the sample through regolith processes.
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Sources of Pb in a Regolith Sample
UU
U
U
Pb
UU
U
U
Pb
Pb
Pb
Pb Pb
A B
UU
U
U
Pb
Pb
Pb Pb
Pb Pb
C Pb
Pb
Pb
Pb
Pb
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb In Soils – The Pb Soil Model - 1
Fixed Mobile
Total(Strong Acid)
Partial(AmAc)
BackgroundRatio
TargetRatio
Pb BF Pb BM PbTM
R Par
R Tot
RPar is the measured isotope ratio of the partial extractionRTot is the measured isotope ratio of the total extraction
SMEDG 26 June 2013
• The use of Pb isotopes in soil geochemistry requires a knowledge of the target and background isotope populations
• In an initial orientation survey both total and partial extractions are required.
• Follow up surveys can be based just on partial extractions
Pb In Soils – The Pb Soil Model - 2
SMEDG 26 June 2013
• Soil contains “Fixed” and “Mobile” components. The boundary between these will vary for different soils and depends on the strengths of the acid leaches used to liberate the metal.
• In any one sampling exercise where the media are similar across the terrain and the analytical procedures standardised, the “Background” population will incorporate a proportion of Pb fixed in the sample (PbBF) and Pb that has been mobilised by weathering from within the sample or from the surrounding background rocks (PbBM).
• It may also contain a component of mobile Pb that has been derived from a Target source buried beneath the cover rocks - or through anthropogenic contamination (PbTM)!
Pb In Soils – The Pb Soil Model - 3
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb In Soils – The Pb Soil Model - 4
• From the generalized mixing model we can derive equations to calculate the concentration of each Pb component of the soil sample:
• Where PbTot and PbPar are the measured total and partial Pb concentrations, SigTot is the Pb isotope signature of the “total” solution
PbTM = SigTot x PbTot
PbBM = PbPar _ PbTM
PbBF = PbTot _ PbPar
Fixed Mobile
Total(Strong Acid)
Partial(AmAc)
BackgroundRatio
TargetRatio
PbBF PbBM PbTM
RParRTot
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Partial Extraction Geochemistry• Anomalies appear to form in soils over covered mineralisation via
processes that transport target and indicator elements through the covered sequence to the near surface.
• Possible mechanisms for this transport include:– Geogas carrier– Electro-chemical potential– Interaction of geogas and soil– Interaction of soil and groundwater– Residual effects– Bioturbation– Biological migration
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Research Procedure• Thesis:
– Pb isotopes in soils potentially retain “a memory” of their source – thus we can determine whether the Pb has derived from hidden mineralisation or from a non-mineralisation source.
– We can extract the most mobile Pb from most samples at very low concentrations and differentiate this potentially transported Pb from Pb that is residual in the soil minerals.
• Procedure:– Undertake case histories at sites where there is known covered
mineralisation and where there is no anthropogenic contamination
– Study a range of deposits from shallow to deep burial.
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Conclusions of Study
1. We have not seen isotopic or trace element anomalies through thick (> 50m) cover.
2. We have seen clear, very sensitive isotopic anomalies through shallow cover over mineralisation with very subtle or no trace element anomalies.
3. We have seen anthropogenic contamination in a variety of situations where it was not expected and which place in doubt the conclusions of many previous studies.
4. We can recognise anomalies associated with anthropogenic contamination.
5. We have not seen anomalies that can be ascribed to vapour transport
SMEDG 26 June 2013
The Pb Soil Model – CASE HISTORY
HYC• HYC is a sediment –hosted massive sulfide
deposit of approximately 400 Mt in the Proterozoic of the Northern Territory.
• The host unit sub-crops beneath alluvial sediments but the ore is deep within the stratigraphy.
• Numerous attempts have been made to detect the mineralization in the overlying regolith.
SMEDG 26 June 2013
HYC Deposit
SMEDG 26 June 2013
HYC Deposit
Line 3400NLine 3400N
Line 7800ELine 7800ELine Line ““WFWF””
MIM LinesMIM Lines
Contamination TestContamination TestLineLine
McArthur RiverMcArthur River
Outline of Outline of OrebobyOreboby
WozybunWozybun FaultFault
Line 3400NLine 3400N
Line 7800ELine 7800ELine Line ““WFWF””
MIM LinesMIM Lines
Contamination TestContamination TestLineLine
McArthur RiverMcArthur River
Outline of Outline of OrebobyOreboby
WozybunWozybun FaultFault
SMEDG 26 June 2013
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
16.0 17.2 18.4 19.615.4
15.6
15.8
16.0 Analytical Precision
HYC Target
Signature
1
0.5
0
BackgroundPopulation
HYC Base Metal DepositNorthern Territory
All soils
Threshold
HYC – Pb Isotope Data
SMEDG 26 June 2013
HYC – Test line downslope from a 60 year old drill hole
818344581834388183431818342481834178183410
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
HYC Contamination Line
Northing
Sign
atu r
e SurfaceMidDepth
TotalPartial
DDH
34th International Geological Congress, Brisbane, August 2012
81834458183436818342881834198183410
40
30
20
10
0
Total Pb Contam Line
Northing
Pb
(ppm
)
81834458183436818342881834198183410
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Partial Pb Contam Line
Northing
Pb (p
pm)
HYC – Test line downslope from a 60 year old drill hole
34th International Geological Congress, Brisbane, August 2012
HYC – Test line downslope from a 60 year old drill hole
81834458183436818342881834198183410
30
20
10
0
Target Mobile Pb Contam Line
Northing
Pb (p
pm)
SurfaceDepth
81834458183436818342881834198183410
30
20
10
0
Background Fixed Pb Contam Line
Northing
Pb (p
pm)
SurfaceDepth
81834458183436818342881834198183410
30
20
10
0
Background Mobile Pb Contam Line
Northing
Pb (p
pm)
SurfaceD epth
PbTM
PbBM PbBF
SMEDG 26 June 2013
1 2 3 4 5 60
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Target MobileBackground MobileBackground FixedPb
(ppm
)
HYC Contamination LineSurface SamplesHYC Soil Pb Model Components
Surface Samples
34th International Geological Congress, Brisbane, August 2012
1 2 3 4 5 60
5
10
15
20
25
Target MobileBackground MobileBackground FixedPb
(ppm
)
HYC Contamination Line30 cm SamplesHYC Soil Pb Model Components30 cm Samples
SMEDG 26 June 2013
HYC – The Lesson Learnt
• Pb isotopes are very sensitive to labile, “target” Pb that cannot be discriminated by normal geochemistry
• This will apply also where the source is geological – not anthropogenic
• Case history studies to determine the effectiveness on novel geochemical techniques anywhere near historic mining or exploration is very very problematic!
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb ISOTOPES – A VEGETATION EXAMPLE
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Vegetation 6km from an Archaean VMS Mine
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
20Pb
/Pb
13.0 15.5 18.0 20.514.4
14.8
15.2
15.6
16.0 Analytical Precision
Bark (570ppb)
Core (3ppb)
Intermediate (7ppb)
Whole Twig (170ppb)
Whole Phyllode (380ppb)
Different leaches of soil samples
Archaean Target)
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Surface Soil (S)
Sub - surface Soil (SS)
SA
AmAc
Strong Acid
Ammonium Acetate
PhyllodeTwig
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
P b
13.0 15.5 18.0 20.514.4
14.8
15.2
15.6
16.0 Analytical Precision
Out of DistrictTrucked Ore
14 S AmAc13 S AmAc
13 Phyllode
14 Phyllode
14 Twig13 Twig
14 S SA13 S SA
13 SS SA
14 SS SA
13 SS AmAc
14 SS AmAc
(940ppb)
(920ppb)
(150ppb)
(86ppb)(180ppb)
(390ppb)(175ppb)
(72ppb)
Surface Soil (S)
Sub - surface Soil (SS)
SA
AmAc
Strong Acid
Ammonium Acetate
PhyllodeTwig
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
P b
13.0 15.5 18.0 20.514.4
14.8
15.2
15.6
16.0 Analytical Precision
14 S AmAc13 S AmAc
13 Phyllode
14 Phyllode
14 Twig13 Twig
14 S SA13 S SA
13 SS SA
14 SS SA
13 SS AmAc
14 SS AmAc
(940ppb)
(920ppb)
(150ppb)
(86ppb)(180ppb)
(390ppb)(175ppb)
(72ppb)
Partial Extraction and Vegetation
CODES MASTERS 2013
Groundwater in vicinity of Archaean VMS deposit
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
13.0 15.5 18.0 20.514.4
14.8
15.2
15.6
16.0 A na lytical Precis io n
1 & 38 & 6
2
7 (11ppt)
4
9 (36ppt Pb, 18ppm Zn)
5 (570ppt Pb, 1ppm Zn)
0.3 - 6ppb Pb5 - 70ppb Zn}
Broken H ill
SMEDG 26 June 2013
MIXING MODEL SENSITIVITY
34th International Geological Congress, Brisbane, August 2012
Theoretical Anomaly
Distance
Pb (p
pm)
Background (Pb /Pb )BM BF = K
AnomalyPbTM
Anomaly caused byaddition of Pb to soilfrom target orebody
SMEDG 26 June 2013
3.02.52.01.51.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Signature Model Sensitivity
Anomaly/Background
Sign
a tur
e
0.01 BM/BF
1.0 BM/BFPartial
1.31.02
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Outcrop Shallow basement
Basement depth <500m
Basement depth 500m to 1000m
Basement depth > 1000m
Cover = Homogeneous, background Pb
34th International Geological Congress, Brisbane, August 2012
Weld Range – Western Australia
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
13.0 14.4 15.8 17.2 18.6 20.0
14.4
14.8
15.2
15.6
16.0Analytical Precision
Achaean Target
Background Soils
Anomalous Soils
Background PopulationsArchaean
500 times MC-ICPMS Precision
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Bluebush – NW Qweensland
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
16 17 18 19 20
15.40
15.55
15.70
15.85Analytical Precision
All soil analyses
Proterozoic Target
Background PopulationsProterozoic
250 times MC-ICPMS Precision
206 204Pb/ Pb
207
204
Pb/
Pb
18.05 18.22 18.39 18.56 18.73 18.9015.56
15.60
15.64
15.68
15.72Analytical Precision
Elura TargetElura Target
BackgroundBackground
0 Ma0 Ma
400 Ma400 Ma
Analytical Precision
This study HNO3/HCl 50850N
This study NaAc 50850N
Gulson HNO3/HCl 50850NGulson HNO3/HCl 50740N
This study HNO3/HCl 50740N
Background PopulationsPalaeozoic
75 times MC-ICPMS Precision
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Analytical Precision
• MC-ICPMS 16.935+/-0.006 (+/- 0.035%)
• Conv. TIMS 16.929+/-0.023 (+/- 0.14%)
• HR-ICPMS 16.806+/-0.044 (+/- 0.26%)• Quad-ICPMS ?????? (but probably ~ 0.5%)
SMEDG 26 June 2013
207 206Pb/ Pb
208
206
Pb/
Pb
0.80 0.86 0.92 0.982.02
2.13
2.24
Background Population
Soils Showing Mixing
Target (HYC)
Analytical Precision
MC-ICPMS
TIMS
What is needed?
100%
50%
0%
Percent Target Population
How Much precision do we need?
Precision of 1% would represent: • 2.5% of the total expected range of data for Archaean soils,• 5% of the total expected range for Proterozoic soils,• 17% of the total expected range for Palaeozoic soils.
SMEDG 26 June 2013
Pb Isotopes – What we need to do
• To develop a robust exploration technology we need to:– Reduce cost of analyses – very large datasets with
lower precision rather than small datasets with high precision , <$50 per sample
– Undertake case histories to validate the technique in greenfields terrains – minimal to no drilling – no mining.