Download - Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf
![Page 1: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Item Response Theory
Advance Psychometric Theory
CPS723P
Dr. Carlo Magno
![Page 2: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Importance of Test Theories
• Estimate examinee ability and how the contribution of error might be minimized
• Disattenuation of variables
• Reporting true scores or ability scores and associated confidence
![Page 3: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Psychometric History
• Lord (1952, 1953) and other psychometricians were interested in psychometric models with which to assess examinees independently of the particular choice of items or assessment tasks that were used in the assessment.
• Measurement practices would be enhanced if item and test statistics would be made sample independent.
• Birnbaum (1957, 1958)• George Rasch (1960)• Wright (1968)
![Page 4: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Limitations of the CTT
• Item difficulty and item discrimination are group dependent.
• The p and r values are dependent on the examinee sample from which they are taken.
• Scores are entirely test dependent.• No basis to predict the performance of
examinees on an item.
![Page 5: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Assumptions in IRT
• Unidimensionality– Examinee performance is a single
ability
• Response Dichotomous– The relationship of examinee
performance on each item and the ability measured by the test is described as monotonically increasing.
![Page 6: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Monotonicity of item performance and ability is typified in an item characteristic curve (ICC).
• Examinees with more ability have higher probabilities for giving correct answers to items than lower ability students (Hambleton, 1989).
![Page 7: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Mathematical model linking the observable dichotomously scored data (item performance) to the unobservable data (ability)
• Pi(θ) gives the probability of a correct response to item i as a function if ability (θ)
• b is the probability of a correct answer (1+c)/2b=item difficulty
a=item discrimination
c=psuedoguessing parameter
a b
c
![Page 8: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Two-parameter model: c=0
• One-parameter model: c=0, a=1
ba
![Page 9: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Three items showing different item difficulties (b)
![Page 10: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Different levels of item discrimination
![Page 11: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Polychotomous IRT Models
• Having more than 2 points in the responses (ex. 4 point scale)
• Partial credit model
• Graded response model
• Nominal model
• Rating scale model
![Page 13: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Graded Response model for a 5-point scale
![Page 14: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• In IRT measurement framework, ability estimates of an examinee obtained from a test that vary difficulty will be the same.
• Because of the unchanging ability, measurement errors are smaller
• True score is determined each test.• Item parameters are independent on
the particular examinee sample used.• Measurement error is estimated at
each ability level.
![Page 15: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Test Characteristic Curve (TCC)• TCC: Sum of ICC that
make up a test or assessment and can be used to predict scores of examinees at given ability levels.
TCC(Ѳ)=∑Pi(Ѳ)• Links the true score to the
underlying ability measures by the test.
• TCC shift to the right of the ability scale=difficult items
![Page 16: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Item Information Function• I(Ѳ), Contribution of
particular items to the assessment of ability.
• Items with higher discriminating power contribute more to measurement precision than items with lower discriminating power.
• Items tend to make their best contribution to measurement precision around their b value.
![Page 17: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Item Information Function
![Page 18: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
–3 –2 –1 1 2 30
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Ability ()
Four item characteristic curves
1 2 3
4
–3 –2 –1 1 2 30
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Ability ()
Item information for four test items
1
2
3
4
Figure 6: Item characteristics curves and corresponding item information functions
![Page 19: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Test Information Function
• The sum of item information functions in a test. • Higher values of the a parameter increase the
amount of information an item provides.• The lower the c parameter, the more information an
item provides.• • The more information provided by an assessment at
a particular level, the smaller the errors associated with ability estimation.
their corresponding IFF
![Page 20: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
30
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Ability ()
Figure 7: Test information function for a four–item test
![Page 21: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Item Parameter Invariance
• Item/test characteristic functions and item/test information functions are integral features of IRT.
![Page 22: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Benefits of Item Response Models• Item statistics that are independent of the
groups from which they were estimated.• Scores describing examinee proficiency or
ability that are not dependent on test difficulty.
• Test models that provide a basis for matching items or assessment tasks to ability levels.
• Models that do not require strict parallel tests or assessments for assessing reliability.
![Page 23: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Application of IRT on Test Development• Item Analysis
– Determining sample invariant item parameters.
– Utilizing goodness-of-fit criteria to detect items that do not fit the specified response model (χ2, analysis of residuals).
![Page 24: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Application of IRT on Test Development• Item Selection
– Assess the contribution of each item the test information function independent of other items.
![Page 25: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
– Using item information functions:• Describe the shape of the desired test
information function vs. desired range abilities.
• Select items with information functions that will fill up the hard to fill areas under the target information function
• Calculate the test information function for the selected assessment material.
• Continue selecting materials until the test information function approximates the target information function to a satisfactory degree.
![Page 26: Irt 1 pl, 2pl, 3pl.pdf](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051111/555388b9b4c9054e0a8b45ff/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Item banking– Test developers can build an
assessment to fit any desired test information function with items having sufficient properties.
– Comparisons of items can be made across dissimilar samples.