Download - Intro Discourse Analysis
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 1/36
Introduc
Discourse AnaJona
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 2/36
What is “discourse”?
language above the sentence or above the clause
a continuous stretch of spoken language larger than a
sentence, often constituting a coherent unit
a stretch of language perceived to be meaningful unifie
purposive; language in use
(viewed) as social practice determined by social structu
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 3/36
Definitions of Discourse
A particular unit of language (above the sentence), odiscourse in structure;
A particular focus on language use, discourse as func
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 4/36
Discourse as structure
Problem: you can have a unit which looks like a sentence but doesn’t me
Colourless green ideas sleep furious
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 5/36
Discourse as structure
On the other hand the units in which people speak do not always look lik
sentences.Bow Chica Bow Wow
That's what my baby said
Bow Bow Bow
And my heart starts pumpin'
Chicka Chicka Chew-Op
Never Gunna Stop
Gitchi Gitchi Goo Means That I love
you!
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 6/36
Discourse as a System of functions
Phatic function (opens a contact)
Emotive function (conveys the need of the sp
Conative function (asks something of the add
Referential function (makes reference to the outside the language)
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 7/36
Definition of Discourse
Discourse – written and spoken
Discourse
Speaker/
writer
Heare
reader
Context
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 8/36
Types of Discourse
There are many ways to classify discourse:
• According to whether it is written or spoken
• According to the register (level of formality)
• According to the genre (communicative purpose, styaudience)
• According to whether it is monologic (one speaker/wproduces an entire discourse)/ or dialogic/ multipar(two/more participants interact/ construct discourse t
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 9/36
Distinction between Written and SpokenDiscourse
The distinction between speecwriting is often referred h nnel (D. Hymes) or medi
speaking and writing indifferent psy hologi l proce
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 10/36
Distinction between Written and Spoken
Discourse
Spoken and written discourse differ forreasons. Spoken discourse has to beunderstood immediately; written discocan be referred to many times
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 11/36
Distinction between Written and SpokenDiscourse
Features of spoken d iscou rse:
• Variations in speed, but it is generally faster
writing.
• Loudness/quietness.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 12/36
Spoken discourse:
• Gestures/ Body language
• Intonation
• Pitch range
• Stress:
• Rhythm.• Pausing and phrasing:
Distinction between Written and SpokenDiscourse
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 13/36
Objects of discourse
‘Discourse’ refers to any utterance whichmeaningful. These texts can be:
- written texts
- oral texts (‘speech’/’talk’)- mixed written/oral texts (e.g. Internet c
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 14/36
The scope of discourse analysis
• Discourse analysis is not a discipline which exists on it
is influenced by other disciplines and influences themis a two-way process …
• For this reason discourse analysis examines spoken antexts from all sorts of different areas (medical, legal,
advertising) and from all sorts of perspectives (race, gpower)
• Discourse analysis has a number of practical applicatioexample in analysing communication problems in medpsychotherapy, education, in analysing written style e
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 15/36
Influences on discourse analysis
sociolinguistics
Discourse Analysis
psycholinguistics
computational
linguistics pragmatics
other non-
linguistic
disciplines
other linguis
disciplines
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 16/36
Structural and functional definitions of disc
• Structural or textual definition of discourse:
Discourse is a particular unit of language (above thesentence).
• Functional definition of discourse: Discourse is a par
focus of language use.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 17/36
Functional approach to discourse
• Roman Jakobson: language performs seven fu
Expressive or Emotive
Directive/ Conative/ Persuasive
Poetic
Contact (Physical or Psychological);
Metalinguistic (Focusing on meaning);
Referential;
Contextual/ Situational
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 18/36
Recent approach to DA
• Discourse is no longer studies for its own sake. Discourse is a social practice.
• M. Foucault, N. Fairclough
• Discourse is characterised as:
produced/consumed/monitored by social actors
(producers/receivers of social practices);shaped by social structures;
with social implications;
socially valued and regulated (production, reception andcirculation).
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 19/36
Approaches to Discourse
Deborah Schiffrin “Approaches to Discourse”(1994) s
out 6 major approaches to discourse:
• the speech act approach;
• interactional sociolinguistics;
• the ethnography of communication;
• pragmatic approach;
• conversation analysis;
• variationist approach.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 20/36
Approaches to Discourse 1)
The Speech Act Approach
Founders of the speech act theory: John Austin & John Searle.
There are different types of speech acts:
• e.g. “speak louder” (directive)
• “Oxford Street is a shopper’s paradise“ (assertive)
Although speech act theory was not first developed as a meansanalyzing discourse, particular issues in speech act theory (indspeech acts, multiple functions of utterances) led to discourse
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 21/36
Speech Acts
• Austin (1962)
• An utterance in dialogue is an ACTION
• Speech acts
• Performative sentences uttered by an authority(they change the state of the world)
• Any sentence in real speech contains
• Locutionary act• Illocutionary act
• Perlocutionary act
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 22/36
Speech Acts
• Searle (1975)• All speech acts classified as
• Assertives – suggesting, boasting, concluding, etc.
• Directives – asking, ordering, inviting, etc.
• Commissives – promising, planning, vowing, etc.
• Expressives – thanking, apologizing, deploring, etc.
• Declarations – performatives (state-changing)
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 23/36
Speech act theory
Each speech act consists of 3 components:
• Locutionary act (the actual words which the speaker is saying);
• Illocutionary act (the intention of the speaker);
• Perlocutionary act (the effect of the utterance on the hearer).
Example 3
(From "Sense and Sensibility")
Wait, he is kneeling down.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 24/36
Speech act theory
• Compare Austin’s classification with other classification of speech acts
Conclusions for DA:
• speech act theory is concerned with what people do with language or it iconcerned with the function of language.;
• a piece of discourse (what is said) is chunked/segmented into units thathave communicative functions,;
• these function are identified and labelled;
• different speech acts initiate and respond to other acts. Acts to a certain
degree specify what kind of response is expected;• they create options for a next utterance each time they are performed;
• An utterance can perform more than one speech act at a time ;
• there is more than one option of responses for a next utterance;
• Deborah Schiffrin: ‘this flexibility has an important analytical consequencit means that a single sequence of utterances may actually be the outcomof a fairly wide range of different underlying functional relations.’
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 25/36
Approaches to Discourse 2)
Interactional sociolinguistics
Represents the combination of three disciplines: anthropologsociology, and linguistics.
Focuses on how people from different cultures may sharegrammatical knowledge of a language but contextualize whis said differently to produce different messages.
e.g. “yeah, bring them down here. I’ll flog them for you”(Australian English)
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 26/36
Approaches to Discourse 3)
The ethnography of communication
The way we communicate depends a lot onthe culture we come from.
Men - WomenAsians - Westerners
Teachers - Students
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 27/36
Approaches to Discourse 4)
Pragmatics
H. P. Grice: the cooperative principle andconversational maxims.
People interact by using minimal assumpti
about one another.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 28/36
Pragmatics
• Based primarily on the ideas of Paul Grice:
• People interact having minimal assumptions (implicatures) about one
• Two types of implicatures: conventional and conversational;
• Conventional implicatures do not require any particular context in ordunderstood (or inferred);
• Conversational implicatures are context – dependant. What is implied
according to the context of an utterance.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 29/36
Pragmatics
• To explain HOW we interpret implicatures Grice introducedCooperative Principal:
• Make your contribution such as required, at the stage at woccurs, by the accepted purpose or direction of the talk exwhich you are engaged.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 30/36
Pragmatics
• There are four conversational maxims which help us to realize the imp
meaning if an utterance:
• Maxim of Quantity:
Make your contributions as informative as required (for the current puthe exchange). Do not make your contribution more informative than
• Maxim of Quality:
Do not say what you believe to be false. Do not say something if you laadequate evidence.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 31/36
Pragmatics
• Maxim of Relation:
Be relative.
• Maxim of Manner:
Be perspicuous (or express your ideas clearly)
Avoid obscurity of expressions (= do not use expressions which are not clear or eunderstand);
Avoid ambiguity (= presence of more than one meaning);Be brief (avoid unnecessary usage of too many words);
Be orderly.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 32/36
Pragmatics
• The contribution of Gricean pragmatics to DA is a set of printhat constrains speakers’ sequential choices in a text and allhearers to recognize speaker’s intentions.
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 33/36
Approaches to Discourse 5)
Conversation analysis
• e.g. A: This is Mr. Smith may I help you
• B: I can’t hear you
• A: This is Mr. Smith
• B: Smith.
Conversational analysis is particularly interested inthe sequencing of utterances, i.e. not in whatpeople say but in how they say it
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 34/36
Summary of approaches to discourse
Approaches to Studying Discourse Focus of Research Research
Structural CA Sequences of talk Why say tmoment?
Variationist Structural categories within
texts
Why that
Functional Speech Acts Communicative acts How to do
words?
Ethnography ofCommunication
Communication as cultural behaviour
How doesreflect cul
Interactional
Sociolinguistics
Social and linguistic meanings
created during communication
What are
Pragmatics Meaning in interaction What doe
mean?
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 35/36
8/9/2019 Intro Discourse Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/intro-discourse-analysis 36/36
Sources
Fromkin, Rodman, and Hymes. (2010). Introduction to linguisticPhilippines: Cengage.
Discourse Analysis Online. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/about/
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. London: Routledge.