Robbie Powell – i7624400 (Youngs Modulus Lab Report) Page 1
Abstract
In this report I explain a recent experiment aimed at finding out the Youngs Modulus, Ultimate tensile
strength and elastic limit, total elongation and total reduction section in cross section of two materials:
- Steel and Aluminium. I discuss the atom structure of materials as well as the cause of the yield point
phenomenon seen in steel. Finally I calculate values for the various properties discuss the results and
explore applications for the different properties as well as the materials.
Robbie Powell – i7624400 (Youngs Modulus Lab Report) Page 2
Introduction:
All products undergo stress and strain caused by forces on an object, whether big or small they must
always be accounted for to avoid failure in a given design. In most cases, materials will have
undergone rigorous testing in order to confirm whether they are fit for function. One such
experiment aims to test the young’s modulus of a given material. “Young’s modulus is a measure of
the ability of a material to withstand changes in length when under lengthwise tension or
compression” (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica)
Figure 1: Stress/Strain Equation
A Young’s modulus experiment is where a material’s tensile strength is tested by being slowly
stretched to find the elastic limit and finally see the breaking point. This information is then used
later in accordance with other factors such as a cost and aesthetics to see if it suits the purpose.
Apparatus and procedure:
Equipment used
- Hounsfield H20K-W*
Two different materials underwent this experiment
- 0.1% Carbon Steel normalised at 900 °C
- Pure Aluminium
Diameter: 5mm
Length: 27mm
Test Speed: 5mm/min
Experiments undertaken on 05/01/2015
Both materials were individually tested by clamping the test pieces into the machine* and beginning
the stretching process. The machine* would slowly pull the test pieces apart until it found breaking
point and then stop.
Figure 2: Hounsfield Picture One Figure 3: Hounsfield Picture Two
Robbie Powell – i7624400 (Youngs Modulus Lab Report) Page 3
Results
The experiment was only undertaken once so the results cannot be checked for precision.
Measurements of materials after test:
Steel
- Cross section of break: 2.79mm
- Longitudinal Extension: 10.88mm
Aluminium
- Cross section of break: 1.26mm
- Longitudinal Extension: 11.23mm
Figure 4: Steel Graph Figure 5: Steel Results
Figure 6: Aluminium Graph Figure 7: Aluminium Results
Robbie Powell – i7624400 (Youngs Modulus Lab Report) Page 4
Figure 8: Steel Material Figure 9: Aluminium Material
Results Analysis
“Load: The force applied to a material during testing
Yield point: Beyond the yield point, plastic deformation occurs.
Ultimate tensile strength: This is the maximum load/force the specimen withstood.
Failure (Breaking Point): This is the point where the specimen failed/fractured.
Elastic deformation: Within this blue region the material will return to its original shape if the load is removed.
Plastic deformation: Within the red region the material will show a permanent change if the load is removed.”
(State of New South Wales, Department of Education and Training 2009)
Figure 10: Load extension Graph
Robbie Powell – i7624400 (Youngs Modulus Lab Report) Page 5
Figure 11: Steel Stress/Strain Graph
Figure 12: Aluminium Stress/Strain Graph
Results for steel
Ultimate tensile strength (Maximum force/Original Area)
7350(N)/19.63x10^-6(mm) = 374.43 (MPa)
Elastic Limit (Can be seen on graph)
6600 (N)
Elastic Modulus (Using stress/strain graphs gradients – Stress/Strain)
(254.7122-20.37697)/((0.02963x10^-6)-(0.018519x10^-6) = 21.09 GPa
Total Elongation (Extension/Original length x 100)
10.88(mm)/27(mm)x100=40.30%
Total reduction in cross section (100-(Cross section at break/original cross section x100)
100-(2.79(mm)/5(mm) x100)=44.2%
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Stre
ss
Strain
Steel
Stress
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Sre
ss
Strain
Aluminium
stress
Robbie Powell – i7624400 (Youngs Modulus Lab Report) Page 6
Figure 14: Dislocations
Results for Aluminium
Ultimate tensile strength (Maximum force/Original Area)
1440(N)/19.63x10^-6(mm) = 73.36 (MPa)
Elastic Limit (Can be seen on graph)
580 (N)
Elastic Modulus (Using stress/strain graphs – Stress/Strain)
(28.52057-18.33465/(0.002778x10^-6)-(0.00083x10^-6) = 5.23 GPa Total Elongation (Extension/Original length x 100)
11.23(mm)/27(mm)x100=41.59%
Total reduction in cross section (100-(Cross section at break/original cross section x100)
100-(1.26(mm)/5(mm)x100)=74.8%
Material Ultimate Tensile Strength
Elastic Limit Elastic Modulus
Total Elongation
Total Reduction in cross section
Steel 374.43 (MPa) 6600(N) 21.09 (GPa) 40.30% 44.2%
Aluminium 73.36 (MPa) 580(N) 5.23 (GPa) 41.59% 74.8% Figure 13: Final Results Table
Discussion
As can be seen from figure 13 the two materials tested gave very different results. Steels Ultimate
tensile strength and Elastic Modulus are both over 4 times of that of Aluminium’s. This clearly
suggests that Steel would be much better suited in load bearing scenarios than aluminium.
These results amongst others aren’t necessarily 100% accurate. Although the machine* used was
calibrated previously, only one test was carried out for each material which could cause the
precision of the results to be questioned.
Other factors could include the technician’s skill that carried out the test as well as fatigue and
impurities in the material.
Impurities can play a major part in testing and failure in a
material and could refer to a few different things.
Point defects are where an atom is missing or irregularly
placed.
Dislocations are where groups of atoms are arranged
awkwardly weakening the structure.
Impurities weaken a material as gaps are left and bonds
cannot connect atoms together. If there is an impurity in a
certain section of a material it could cause that area to fail
unexpectedly. As this test was only carried out once, the
Robbie Powell – i7624400 (Youngs Modulus Lab Report) Page 7
precision of results cannot be known.
As can be seen from the information displayed on figure 13, Steel has a very high Elastic Modulus
and Ultimate tensile strength making it very useful for high load structures such as bridges, vehicle
frames and building supports. When looking at figure 11, we can see that after enough force is
applied so that it passes the elastic limit, the stress drops and rises – faltering as it goes. This is called
the yield point phenomenon and is a result of strain aging as well as dislocations in the material.
This is because as the metal is stretched before the elastic limit, the atom structure will not
permanently change. However, after the elastic limit has been passed dislocations start to occur and
while the molecules are rearranging; the stress drops. However once the bonds have attached once
again, the stress will rise. The higher the dislocation density, the longer this will continue for until
finally the graph should show a more fluid curve up to the Ultimate tensile strength. After this point
is achieved, the cross sectional area will begin to decrease at a rapid rate, causing the stress to drop
considerably until the breaking point.
Compared to Steel, the aluminium can be seen to be weaker due to its low ultimate tensile strength
and elastic modulus. As demonstrated in figure 12, the stress has a much gentle curve as the atoms
are able to rearrange more effectively in the structure. This is why aluminium is more suited to less
load bearing applications such as tin cans. The total elongation is roughly the same as steels however
the reduction in cross section is significantly more, as is displayed in figure 13. This is ultimately due
to the strength of the material in which materials with higher elastic modulus’s can resist lateral
stress more effectively. Aluminium, just like rubber (although an extreme example) will reduce in
width as it’s stretched, reducing the force and therefor the stress needed to pull it apart.
Applications
- Crane Wire
An application in which the properties of this experiment would
have needed to be measured could be a crane wire. A crane wire is
made up of a huge amount of wires used together to create one -
but for sake of this example, ill think of it as one large part. Cranes
are capable of picking up extreme amounts of weight - often as
much as 20 tons. The result of failure could be catastrophic so
huge amounts of testing would have to be undergone before it could be cleared for use. Obviously a
material with high, ultimate tensile strength, elastic modulus and elastic limit would be needed as
the wire cannot be allowed to plastically deform and a factor of safety must be added in case the
maximum limit is exceeded. For example of the maximum mass allowed is 20 tons (18143.7 kg) then
we can work out the minimum elastic limit.
- Minimum elastic limit = 18143.7 x 9.81 = 177989.697 N
This means that if any more than this weight is put on the wire then it will plastically deform. The
ultimate tensile strength would have to be much higher than the elastic limit to avoid dramatic
failure in the case of far too much weight being put on the wire.
Figure 15: Crane
Robbie Powell – i7624400 (Youngs Modulus Lab Report) Page 8
- Diving Board
Another application would be a diving board. The most important
properties for function in a diving board are the elastic modulus
and the elastic limit, although ultimate tensile strength will
ultimately control failure and fracture of a material. A diving board
is an interesting one as the design of the board will also change the
minimum properties required in the design. For instance, the
length of the board will effect the strain, and therefor the elastic
modulus. Because of this we can presume the longer the board, the lower the resistance to bending
it will hold. However, it still needs to hold its shape and be able to create an upwards force after
bending so a middle ground must be found.
In terms of the elastic limit, a high yielding material must be found as if to much force is applied to
the board for it to pass this point, the board will not spring back. For this example let’s presume the
maximum mass allowed on the board for safety and function is 150kg. Let’s also presume that a user
will fall at a constant rate after jumping relative to gravity.
- Minimum elastic limit = 150 x 9.81 = 1471.5 N
Finally, the ultimate tensile strength would be important in terms of avoiding fracture so again; a
factor of safety must be considered with this property.
Conclusion
In conclusion this experiment can be extremely important in testing materials so that dramatic
failure is avoided once the product has been made. The two different materials tested both
exhibited very different results in the tests showing their purpose for certain functions in industry,
although steel proved to be the stronger material of the two with results showing as much as five
times of that of aluminium. I’ve found that dislocation densities can effect results from a material
dramatically and must be tested for thoroughly. I’ve also seen that the properties explored in this
report generally rise together, although as shown in applications; particular properties of materials
in given products will need to go against this theory in order to function. This would be achieved by a
variety of different material altering techniques or by incorporating informed design of the product.
References
The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. Youngs Modulus. Available:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/654186/Youngs-modulus. Last accessed
17th February 2015.
Figure 1:
Anon. Stress/Strain Equation. Available:
https://papercrete.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/e.jpg. Last accessed 17th February
2015.
Figure 2: Hounsfield Picture One
Wood, Adam. Lab Report 1 and 2 - Photos. [Pictures] Bournemouth
Figure 16: Diving Board
Robbie Powell – i7624400 (Youngs Modulus Lab Report) Page 9
Figure 3: Hounsfield Picture Two
Wood, Adam. Lab Report 1 and 2 - Photos. [Pictures] Bournemouth
Figure 4: Steel Graph
Bournemouth University. Lab Report Experiment (05/01/2015)
Figure 5: Steel Results
Bournemouth University. Lab Report Experiment (05/01/2015)
Figure 6: Aluminium Graph
Bournemouth University. Lab Report Experiment (05/01/2015)
Figure 7: Aluminium Results
Bournemouth University. Lab Report Experiment (05/01/2015)
Figure 8:
Wood, Adam. Lab Report 1 and 2 - Photos. [Pictures] Bournemouth
Figure 9:
Wood, Adam. Lab Report 1 and 2 - Photos. [Pictures] Bournemouth
Figure 10: Load/extension Graph
State of New South Wales, Department of Education and Training 2009.
(2009). Load/extension Graph. Available:
http://lrrpublic.cli.det.nsw.edu.au/lrrSecure/Sites/Web/tensile_testing/lo/03_what_does
_it_mean/applets/highlighter_load_ext_text.htm. Last accessed 17th February 2015.
State of New South Wales, Department of Education and Training 2009
Load/extension Graph labels. Available:
http://lrrpublic.cli.det.nsw.edu.au/lrrSecure/Sites/Web/tensile_testing/lo/03_what_does
_it_mean/applets/highlighter_load_ext_text.htm. Last accessed 17th February 2015.
Figure 12: Aluminium Stress/Strain Graph
Qi, Zang. Lab Report Graph. Bournemouth
Figure 14: Spaceflight Editors. Dislocations. Available:
http://www.spaceflight.esa.int/impress/text/education/Images/Glossary/GlossaryImage0
20.jpg. Last accessed 17th February 2015.
Figure 15: Anon. Crane. Available: http://www.constructionmachineryme.com/wp-
content/uploads/2012/08/liebherr-crane-turkey.jpg. Last accessed 25 February 2015.
Figure 16: SRS Smith. Diving Board. Available:
http://www.srsmith.com/media/14884/cantilever__3_.jpg. SRS Smith. Last accessed 25
February 2015.
Bibliography
https://www.nde-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Materials/cc_mat_index.htm