![Page 1: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Gender Inequality in Achievement and
Teacher/Student Interaction
![Page 2: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Problem Statement
Female students often do not perform up to their potential
when completing assessments where they are expected verbalize what they have
learned.
![Page 3: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
89%
82%
78%
80%
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
1
Written v. Verbal Assignment Averages
Female Student Performance - Escuela Bilingüe Honduras 2006
V
Verbal
Written
89%
82%
78%
80%
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
1Written v. Verbal Assignment Averages
Female Student Performance - Escuela Bilingüe Honduras 2006
V
Verbal Assessments
Written Assessments
![Page 4: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Research Based Findings
“In the early grades girls are ahead of or equal to boys on almost every standardized measure of achievement and psychological wellbeing. By the time they graduate from high school or college, they have fallen back” (Sadker, p.13).
![Page 5: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Possible Contributors “Girls receive fewer academic contacts, are
asked lower level questions, and are provided less constructive feedback and encouragement than boys – all of which translates into reduced preparation for independent effort” (Marshall, 1997).
“Teachers ask boys more direct questions, more open-ended questions and more complex and abstract questions” (Edge, 1997).
![Page 6: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Intervention
Call on students using a random system; Draw names from a hat. Allot each student a number, write those
numbers on tongue depressors, and draw numbers at random.
DO NOT consistently call on students with hands raised (unconscious teacher bias)
![Page 7: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Research on Intervention
“Devise a system to recognize each student during a discussion or questions-and-answer session” (Marshall, 1997)
“Increase classroom participation by using name cards to ensure that all students are required to respond to questions”
(Funk, 2002).
![Page 8: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Research Question
Will a random calling system raise the total grade point average of the class as
a whole?
![Page 9: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Research Plan
Interrupted Time Series (over one four week unit) 3 quizzes 1 unit test
Two Classes One control One treatment
Quantitative *To avoid confrontation/embarrassment/other confounding
factors, reiterate questions upon request or allow students to ‘pass’ after they give an effort.
![Page 10: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Validity and Reliability
External factors: Time of the day that the classes meet Initial level of the classes, including participation and
general achievement Difficulty of material being taught
Teacher must insure that treatment is being implemented consistently and that confounding factors do not skew data. (Observer?)
![Page 11: Gender Inequality in Achievement and Teacher/Student Interaction](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022071806/56649cec5503460f949b8f74/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Desired Result of Treatment
Equal student/teacher interaction for every student
More engaged students Higher average achievement for the class as
a whole.