-
Financial EconometricsChapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns
In Choi
Sogang University
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 1 / 30
-
References
Cochrane, J.H. (2001) Asset Pricing, Princeton University Press.
Cochrane, J.H. (2006) The Dog That Did Not Bark: A Defense ofReturn Predictability, mimeo.
Campbell, J.Y., A.W. Lo and A.C. MacKinlay (1997) The Economicsof Financial Markets, Princeton University Press.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 2 / 30
-
Conventional views on the predictability of asset returns
Stock returns are close to unpredictable and nearly identicallydistributed.Prices are random walk represented by
ln (Pt ) = ln (Pt�1) + ut ; ut � iid�0, σ2
�or log returns follow iid process.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 3 / 30
-
Conventional views on the predictability of asset returns
Bond returns are nearly unpredictable.If longterm bond yields are higher than shortterm yields, it meansthat shortterm interest rates are expected to rise in the future.Therefore, owning either longterm or shortterm bond will providethe same return in the future.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 4 / 30
-
Conventional views on the predictability of asset returns
Foreign exchange returns are not predictable.Holding foreign or domestic bonds yield the same rate of return.
Stock market volatility (varaince) does not change over time. (returnsare iid process)
Professional managers do not outperform simple indices and passiveportfolios once one corrects for risk.
These views mean that asset markets are informationally e¢ cient.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 5 / 30
-
New, emerging views on the predictability of asset markets
Variables including the dividend/price ratio and term premium canpredict substantial amounts of stock return variates. But daily, weeklyand monthly stock returns are still close to unpredictable.
Bond returns are predictable.A steeply upward sloping yield curve means that expected returns onlongterm bonds are higher than on shortterm bonds for the nextyear.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 6 / 30
-
New, emerging views on the predictability of asset markets
Foreign exchange returns are predictable.See, e.g., Mark, N.C. (1995) Exchange Rates and Fundamentals:Evidence on Long-horizon Predictability, American Economic Review.
Stock market volatility changes through time.
Some funds seem to outperform simple indices even after controllingfor risks.
Still, markets are believed to be reasonably e¢ cient.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 7 / 30
-
Longhorizon stock return regressions
ModelRt+k [k ]� Rt+k ,f = α+ β (Dt/Pt ) + ut
Dt : dividend,Pt : price,Rt ,f : riskfree return.
If β > 0, high dividend/price ratio predicts high return.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 8 / 30
-
Longhorizon stock return regressions
Some empirical results for the long-horizon stock return regression arereported in Cochrane (2001, p.390).
Horizon k (years) β̂ s.e. R2
1 5.3 (2.0) 0.152 10 (3.1) 0.233 15 (4.0) 0.375 33 (5.8) 0.60
Sample: 19471996. Value weighted NYSE-treasury bill was regressed onthe percent value weights dividend/price ratio.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 9 / 30
-
Longhorizon stock return regressions
Other variables such as the term spread between longandshortterm bonds, the default spread (corporate less T-bill yield), theTbill rate and the earnings/dividend ratio, the book/market ratiohave been used with some success. See Cochrane (2001, p.391).
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 10 / 30
-
Longhorizon stock return regressions
Longhorizon return forecastsHorizon k (years) cay d � p d � e rrel R2
1 6.7 0.181 0.14 0.08 0.041 -4.5 0.101 5.4 0.07 -0.05 -3.8 0.236 12.4 0.166 0.95 0.68 0.396 -5.10 0.036 5.9 0.89 0.65 1.36 0.42
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 11 / 30
-
Longhorizon stock return regressions
Return : log real excess returns on the S&P composite index�r rt � r rf ,t
�cay : consumption to wealth ratiod : log of the sum of the past four quarters of dividendse : log of a single quarters earnings per sharep : log of the index
rrel : T-bill rate minus its 12 month backward moving averaged � p : dividend yieldd � e : payout ratiosample : 1952:IV1998:III
original source : Lettau and Ludvigson, Journal of Finance, 2001
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 12 / 30
-
Longhorizon stock return regressions
At oneyear horizon, cay and rrel are more important. At sixyear horizon,d � p and d � e becomes more important.
Why does longhorizon regression provide higher coe¢ cient estimate?Consider the predictive regression
rt+1 = axt + εt+1;
xt+1 = ρxt + δt+1.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 13 / 30
-
Longhorizon stock return regressions
Then
rt+1 + rt+2 = a (1+ ρ) xt + aδt+1 + εt+1 + εt+2;
rt+1 + rt+2 + rt+3 = a�1+ ρ+ ρ2
�xt + aρδt+1 + aδt+2 + εt+1 + εt+2 + εt+3;
...
When ρ is close to 1, the coe¢ cient of xt increases with horizon.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 14 / 30
-
Explaining high stock price
When prices are high relative to dividends,1 dividends are expected to rise in the future (Dt ")2 returns are expected to become low in the future (Pt #)3 price/dividend ratio grows explosively
Virtually all variation in price/dividend ratios has reected varyingexpected excess returns.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 15 / 30
-
Explaining high stock price
Price can be expressed in terms of future dividends and returns.Consider the identity
1 = (1+ Rt+1)�1 (1+ Rt+1) = (1+ Rt+1)
�1 Pt+1 +Dt+1Pt
and hence
PtDt
= (1+ Rt+1)�1 Pt+1 +Dt+1
Pt� PtDt
= (1+ Rt+1)�1�1+
Pt+1Dt+1
�Dt+1Dt
.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 16 / 30
-
Explaining high stock price
Taking logs of
PtDt= (1+ Rt+1)
�1�1+
Pt+1Dt+1
�Dt+1Dt
,
we have
pt � dt = �rt+1 + ∆dt+1 + ln�1+ ept+1�dt+1
�,
where rt+1 = ln(Pt+1+Dt+1
Pt) � pt+1 � pt . The Taylor expansion of
ln�1+ ept+1�dt+1
�around P/D = exp(p � d) gives1
ln�1+ ept+1�dt+1
�� ln
�1+
PD
�+
P/D1+ P/D
[pt+1 � dt+1 � (p � d)] .
1 ln(1+ ex ) � ln(1+ exo ) + exo1+exo (x � xo ).In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 17 / 30
-
Explaining high stock price
Using this, we obtain
pt � dt � �rt+1 + ∆dt+1 + k + ρ (pt+1 � dt+1) .
Iterate this relation forward, then
pt � dt � const+∞
∑j=1
ρj�1 (∆dt+j � rt+j ) .
Taking conditional expectations, we obtain an ex ante relation
pt � dt � const+ Et∞
∑j=1
ρj�1 (∆dt+j � rt+j ) .
This shows that a high price/dividend ratio must be followed by highdividend growth or low returns.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 18 / 30
-
Explaining high stock price
Assume E (∆dt+j � rt+j ) = 0. Then,
Var (pt � dt ) = E [pt � dt � E (pt � dt )]2
= E [pt � dt � E (pt � dt )]"
∞
∑j=1
ρj�1 (∆dt+j � rt+j )#
= Cov
pt � dt ,
∞
∑j=1
ρj�1∆dt+j
!
�Cov pt � dt ,
∞
∑j=1
ρj�1rt+j
!,
positive variance of the price/dividend ratio implies that the dividendgrowth and/or the return should be correlated with the ratio. Almostall variation in price/dividend ratio is due to changing return forecasts.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 19 / 30
-
Explaining high stock price
Almost all variation in price/dividend ratio is due to changing returnforecasts as shown in the following table (from Cochrane, 2001, p.398).
Variance decomposition of value weighted NYSE price/dividend ratioDividends Returns
Real -34 138s.e. 10 32Nominal 30 85s.e. 41 19
Entries in the second and fourth rows are the estimates of100� Cov
�pt � dt , ∑∞j=1 ρj�1∆dt+j
�/Var (pt � dt ) and
�100� Cov�pt � dt , ∑∞j=1 ρj�1rt+j
�/Var (pt � dt ) , respectively.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 20 / 30
-
Explaining high stock price
Again from Cochrane (2001, p.390), regressing Dt+k/Dt on Dt/Pt yieldsthe following results.
Horizon k (years) β̂ s.e. R2
1 2.0 1.1 0.062 2.5 2.1 0.063 2.4 2.1 0.065 4.7 2.4 0.12
These results shows that the relation between the dividend growth andprice/dividend ratio is weak.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 21 / 30
-
Evidence of predictability
See Tables 2.4 and 2.8 of Campbell, Lo and Mackinlay (1997).
1 Strong evidence of positive autocorrelation at lag one for indexreturns.
2 Weak negative autocorrelations are observed for individual securities.3 Autocorrelations across stocks are quite strong.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 22 / 30
-
Mean reversion
Longrun regressionFama and French (1988, JPE) estimated the model
rt+k [k ] = a+ bk rt [k ] + εt+k .
Negative and signicant b coe¢ cients were found: a string of goodpast returns forecasts bad future returns.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 23 / 30
-
Mean reversion
Variance ratioIf rt are uncorrelated,
Var (rt+k [k ]) = Var (rt+1 + rt+2 + � � �+ rt+k )= kVar (rt+1) .
The variance ratio statistic is dened by
Vk =Var (rt+k [k ])kVar (rt+1)
.
This should be close to one if rt are uncorrelated.If the variance ratio is less than one, it implies that stocks are safer forlong-run investorswho can tolerate ups and downs of the market.Porterba and Summers (1988, JFE) found variance ratios below one,suggesting that the returns are correlated and that negativecorrelations exist.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 24 / 30
-
Mean reversion: Empirics
From Cochrane (2001, p.412),
Mean reversion using logs, 1926-1996 (log value-weighted NYSE return -long T-bill return used)Horizon k (years)1 2 3 5 7 10
σ(k�period excess return)pk
19.8 20.6 19.7 18.2 16.5 16.3
bk 0.08 -0.15 -0.22 -0.04 0.24 0.08
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 25 / 30
-
Mean reversion: Empirics
Evidence of mean reversion at periods 2, 3 and 5. But it disappearsat longer horizons.
Variance ratio at year 10 is (16.3/19.8)2 = 0.68 (< 1).
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 26 / 30
-
Relative mean reversion in international stock markets
Balvers, Wu and Gilliland (2000) Mean Reversion across NationalStock Markets and Parametric Contrarian Investment Strategies.Journal of Finance.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 27 / 30
-
Relative mean reversion in international stock markets
pit : log of the total return index of the stock market in country i atthe end of period t.
Evolution of pit is described by a mean-reverting process
pi ,t+1 � pi ,t = ai + λ(p�i ,t+1 � pit ) + εi ,t+1.
p�it : an unobserved fundamental value of the index.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 28 / 30
-
Relative mean reversion in international stock markets
Paramter λ is the speed of mean reversion and is assumed to be thesame across countries.
If 0 < λ < 1, deviations of pit from its fundamental or trend valuep�i ,t+1 will be reversed over time.
But if λ = 0, the log price follows a unit root process so that there isno mean reversion.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 29 / 30
-
Relative mean reversion in international stock markets
Assumep�it = p
�r ,t + zi + ηi ,t
where p�r ,t is a reference countrys fundamental value of the index andzi a constant.
Then,ri ,t+1 � rr ,t+1 = αi � λ(pi ,t � pr ,t ) +ωi ,t+1,
where ri ,t+1 � pi ,t+1 � pi ,t .No mean reversion (i.e., λ = 0) corresponds to the presence of a unitroot in pi ,t � pr ,t .Balvers, Wu and Gilliland report evidence of mean reversion in relativestock index prices using stock index data of 18 nations during theperiod 1969-1996.
In Choi (Sogang University) Chapter 5: Predicting Asset Returns 30 / 30