Transcript
Page 1: Exchange Interactions Dipolar Interactions Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation Atom Magnetic Domains

Exchange Interactions

Dipolar Interactions

Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation

Atom

Magnetic Domains

Page 2: Exchange Interactions Dipolar Interactions Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation Atom Magnetic Domains

Vary Spacing

Vary Size

Vary Ordering

Magnetic Nanoparticle Arrays

Page 3: Exchange Interactions Dipolar Interactions Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation Atom Magnetic Domains

• Fe synthesized using air free solution chemistry methods

• Thermal decomposition of Fe(CO)5 in octyl ether

• Particles coated with surfactant

• Washed with ethanol and dispersed in hexane

H e a t S t i r

D. F. Farrell, S. A. Majetich, and J. P. Wilcoxon, J. Phys. Chem. 107, 11022-11030 (2003).

Nanoparticle Synthesis

Page 4: Exchange Interactions Dipolar Interactions Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation Atom Magnetic Domains

7.0 ± 0.8 nm 9.2 ±0.7 nm

FeFeSeeded with Pt (Fe:Pt ~1000:1)

Heterogeneously Nucleated Fe

Page 5: Exchange Interactions Dipolar Interactions Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation Atom Magnetic Domains

9.1 ± 0.9 nm 11.2 ± 1.0 nm 19 nm

No Pt salt, larger amount of oleic acid surfactant Fe

Homogeneously Nucleated Fe

Page 6: Exchange Interactions Dipolar Interactions Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation Atom Magnetic Domains

Heterogeneous Homogeneous

Fe oxide rings dominate

Electron Diffraction

Page 7: Exchange Interactions Dipolar Interactions Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation Atom Magnetic Domains

Heterogeneously Nucleated Homogeneously Nucleated

2 Blocking T’s: Fe, Fe oxide

H = 200 Oe

Field-cooled, Zero field-cooled Magnetization

7.0 ± 0.8 nm 11.2 ± 1.0 nm 0.01vol. %

Blocking Temperatures

Page 8: Exchange Interactions Dipolar Interactions Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation Atom Magnetic Domains

Particle Concentration

Nucleation Method

Fe conc. Particle Diameter

#Particles per mL

Heterogen. 0.051 M 5.8 ± 0.5 nm 3.6

Heterogen. 0.0957 M 7.2 ± 0.5 nm 3.5

Heterogen. 0.614 M 8.6 ± 1.6 nm 1.3

Heterogen. 0.81 M 8.4 ± 1.0 nm 1.9

Homogen. 0.0284 M 11.2 ± 1.0 nm -----

Found from calibrated x-ray fluorescence of solutions*

Use to determine total mass of Fe s

* Dr. Jess P. Wilcoxon, Sandia National Laboratories

Page 9: Exchange Interactions Dipolar Interactions Competition between exchange and dipolar interactions leads to domain formation Atom Magnetic Domains

Oxide Shell Thickness• Relate s of particles to weighted average of s of

Fe core and Ms of oxide shell

s,partmpart = s,coremcore + s,shellmshell

Diameter s Fe core Oxide shell

7.0 ± 0.7 nm heterogeneous

175 emu/g 5.8 nm 0.6 nm

9.2 ± 0.7 nm heterogeneous

175 emu/g 8.4 nm 0.4 nm

11.2 ± 1.0 nm homogeneous

110 emu/g 7.0 nm 2.1 nm


Top Related