Environmental Fate of Aquatic HerbicidesHerbicides
UF IFAS Aquatic Weed Control ShortUF-IFAS Aquatic Weed Control Short Course
Michael Netherland Ph DMichael Netherland, Ph.DUS Army Engineer Research & Development Center
US Army Corps of EngineersBUILDING STRONG®
What Happens After You Spray ?What Happens After You Spray ?
Emergent vs Submersed Applications Emergent vs. Submersed Applications• Emergent plants intercept a large % of the product• Submersed trmt. – uptake is a minor factor (1 to 4 %)Submersed trmt. uptake is a minor factor (1 to 4 %)
Different volumes for emergent & submersed control • 2,4-D = ~ 2 qts/acre emergent, q g• 2,4-D = ~20 qts/acre submersed
Herbicides ultimately reach the water columny• How long do they persist and how do they degrade ?
BUILDING STRONG®
Submersed biomass does not correlate with a significant removal (uptake) of herbicidea significant removal (uptake) of herbicide
BUILDING STRONG®3
Emergent TreatmentsBulk of product is initially absorbed by emergent plant tissue
BUILDING STRONG®4
Amount that enters the water depends on the density of the plant standon the density of the plant stand
BUILDING STRONG®5
Is Herbicide Released from Treated Vegetation ?
-Can be metabolized by tolerant plants-Non-herbicidal compounds
Can be sequestered in vacuoles-Can be sequestered in vacuoles-Can be bound to organic constituents-Can be slowly released from decaying plant matterCan be slowly released from decaying plant matter
BUILDING STRONG®
Herbicide DispersionHerbicide Dispersion
Aquatic herbicides disperse in waterAquatic herbicides disperse in water ► movement from the treatment site
• Flow winds scale of treatment - drive dispersion• Flow, winds, scale of treatment - drive dispersion
Concentrations can be rapidly dilutedDil ti i t th d d ti Dilution is not the same as degradation►Dilution can result in concentrations being too
l f h bi id l ti itlow for herbicidal activity
BUILDING STRONG®7
Rate of Dispersion – Major influence on Efficacyon Efficacy
e.g. Fluridone vs. Diquat
P d t Di i
g q
TARGET Control Area
Product Dispersion
Thermal Gradient
BUILDING STRONG®Engineer Research and Development CenterUS Army Corpsof Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®9
Lakes Woodruff and Dexter – Natl. Wildlife Refuge – 12/07
- Woodruff ~ 750 / 2200 acres treated at 2.0 ppmDexter ~518/ 1800 acres treated at 3 0 ppm- Dexter ~518/ 1800 acres treated at 3.0 ppm
BUILDING STRONG®
12 Herbicides Registered for Aquatic Use
Copper (1900’s) 2 4-D (1950’s)Copper (1900 s) 2,4 D (1950 s) Endothall (1960) Diquat (1962)
Gl h t (1977) Fl id (1986) Glyphosate (1977) Fluridone (1986) Triclopyr (2002) Imazapyr (2003) Carfentrazone (2004) Penoxsulam (2007) Imazamox (2008) Flumioxazin (2011)Imazamox (2008) Flumioxazin (2011)
BUILDING STRONG®11
Primary Mode of DegradationPrimary Mode of Degradation
Photolysis (5/12)Photolysis (5/12) Inactivation followed by microbial (2/12)
Mi bi l D d ti (2/12) Microbial Degradation (2/12) Hydrolysis (2/12) Copper (1/12) – elemental
►Biologically inactive but never broken down►Biologically inactive but never broken down
BUILDING STRONG®12
Photolysis (5 of 12 Products)Photolysis (5 of 12 Products)
Energy from sun breaks chemical bondsgy• Ultraviolet (uv) light• Different wavelengths of uv for different molecules
Fluridone and Penoxsulam –• half-lives 20 to 50 days
Triclopyr, Imazapyr, and Imazamox • half-lives average 5 to 14 daysg y
BUILDING STRONG®13
PhotolysisPhotolysis Photolysis occurs in the top few inches of lakePhotolysis occurs in the top few inches of lake
water How does water depth impact the rate of p p
degradation ? Can photolysis occur below a thermocline ?p y Can photolysis occur below a dense plant mat ? Molecules split by photolysis into smaller partso ecu es sp t by p oto ys s to s a e pa ts
► Photolysis, microbial, hydrolysis,
BUILDING STRONG®
Photolytic Degradation of Fluridone
BUILDING STRONG®
Photolysis and EfficacyPhotolysis and Efficacy
Fluridone and PenoxsulamFluridone and Penoxsulam ►Product longevity = improved efficacy
Imazapyr, Imazamox, Triclopyr – emergent►Herbicide in plant tissue not subject to
photolysis
BUILDING STRONG®16
Inactivation (3/12)Inactivation (3/12) Diquat, Glyphosate and Copper-
inactivated in water►Half-lives can be hours to days (water quality)►Impacts efficacy on submersed plants
Molecules exist as ions in water►Diquat ++ Glyphosate – Copper++
Ionic bonds = inactivation Ionic bonds = inactivation ►No further herbicidal activity (water or soil)
BUILDING STRONG®17
Clay and Organic Matter = High surface area and full of negative charges
Diquat = ++ charges
Once diquat is bound to sediment – microbial degradation proceeds very slowly- half-life > 1000 days
BUILDING STRONG®18
Copper (micronutrient)Copper (micronutrient)
Copper is inactivated but does not degradeCopper is inactivated but does not degrade►Rapidly removed from water column
Forms numerous complexes and ultimately Forms numerous complexes and ultimately resides in sediment
Bi l i ll ti ?►Biologically active ? Florida – heavy use for private sector
(algae), limited use in public waters
BUILDING STRONG®19
Microbial Degradation (2/12)Microbial Degradation (2/12) Endothall and 2,4-D microbial degradation , g
is the primary pathway ►Source of carbon (energy/food) for microbes►Some microbes specialize on herbicides
All aquatic herbicides are subject to microbial degradation (one key exception)►What factors dictate the rate of degradation ?
BUILDING STRONG®
Factors that Influence Microbial Degradation
TemperatureTemperature►We use cold temperature to extend exposure
Prior application Prior application►Efficient microbe populations can be selected
Water (aerobic) vs. Sediment (anaerobic)►Oxygen can enhance or inhibit breakdown
BUILDING STRONG®
Effect of Temperature on Microbial Degradation of Endothall
2000
16 C21 C27 C
1500ppb
1000
End
otha
ll,
500
E
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168
0
BUILDING STRONG®
Hours Posttreatment
Enhanced DegradationEnhanced Degradation Enhanced microbial degradation is well-Enhanced microbial degradation is well
described in terrestrial settings Soil half-life of 2,4-D can decrease withSoil half life of 2,4 D can decrease with
increasing use pattern As long as enhanced degradation does notAs long as enhanced degradation does not
impact efficacy, it is viewed as positive
BUILDING STRONG®
Lake Tomahawk, WI – 2008• 250 acres of 2 4-D at 0 5 ppm• 250 acres of 2,4-D at 0.5 ppm• 1st Time Lake had been treated
½ Life in Water = > 50 days500
600
3 days of exposure will kill milfoil at this rate2,
4 D
, ppb
200
300
400
Severe reductions or loss of 21 species including “tolerant”Sample Date
May 14May 28 Jun 10 Jul 8 Jul 260
100
species including tolerant monocots
Sample Date
BUILDING STRONG®
Enhanced Fluridone DegradationEnhanced Fluridone Degradation
In several FL lakes with significant use In several FL lakes with significant use history, we observed: 1) Rapid degradation of fluridone 1) Rapid degradation of fluridone
►Degradation in the dark►Half-lives of fluridone < 3 days►Half-lives of fluridone < 3 days►Narrowed to enhanced microbial activity
BUILDING STRONG®
Hydrolysis (2/12)Hydrolysis (2/12)
Both Flumioxazin and Carfentrazone areBoth Flumioxazin and Carfentrazone are degraded by hydrolysis Process can result in rapid degradation Process can result in rapid degradation pH-dependent (flumioxazin)
►pH 5 - 4 days►pH 7 - 24 hours►pH 9 – 22 minutes
BUILDING STRONG®26
Miscellaneous QuestionsMiscellaneous Questions
Are aquatic herbicides subject toAre aquatic herbicides subject to volatilization? What is adsorption and desorption ? What is adsorption and desorption ?
►Think fluridone and organic matter f f How does degradation of herbicides from
granular formulations compare to liquids ? Is this guy ever going to stop talking ?
BUILDING STRONG®27
SUMMARY– Herbicides subject to degradationj gPrimary & Secondary Modes of Degradation
2,4-D (2, 1) Diquat (3 2) Diquat (3, 2) Endothall (2) Flumioxazin (4 2)
1) Photolysis2) Microbial Degradation3) Inactivation Flumioxazin (4,2)
Fluridone (1,2)Glyphosate (3 2)
3) Inactivation4) Hydrolysis
Glyphosate (3, 2) Imazamox (1, 2)
BUILDING STRONG®