![Page 1: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Duty to Protect: Historical Review & Current Considerations
Jennifer Piel, MD, JDFebruary 2019
1
![Page 2: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Duty to Warn or Protect:Reactions to this term?
![Page 3: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
A Balancing Act: Forces in Conflict
• Protect patient confidentiality
• Protect therapeutic alliance
• Treat in least restrictive environment
• Protect others from patient’s violence
• Difficulty with accurate risk prediction
• Liability
3
![Page 4: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Terms of Art
• Confidentiality
• Duty to warn
• Duty to protect
• Tarasoff-type duty
• Tarasoff limiting law
4
![Page 5: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Beginning
5
![Page 6: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Tarasoff
• Tarasoff I (1974) : Duty to warn– The protective privilege ends where the public
peril begin
• Tarasoff II (1976): Duty to protect– When a therapist determines, or should
determine, that his patient presents a serious risk of danger of violence to another, he incurs an obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger
6
![Page 7: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Trends Post-Tarasoff
• Period of extensions (1980s)
– To unidentifiable victims
– For unintentional harm
– To property
• Period of retractions (1990s)
– Further define what triggers the duty
– Specific steps to discharge duty
7
![Page 8: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Post-Tarasoff Concerns
• Patients will not be honest with providers
• Patients will not seek care
• Patients often vent thoughts that are fleeting
• Risk of overreaction of clinician (liability)
• How to discharge the duty
8
![Page 9: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Tarasoff-Limiting Statutes
• Most statutes require either a “serious” or “actual threat” against a clearly identified or reasonably identifiable victim(s)
• Statutes identify one or more options to discharge the duty. For example:– Notify intended victim(s)– Notify law enforcement– Initiate hospitalization (voluntary, involuntary)– Other reasonable steps
9
![Page 10: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Model StatuteAPA Model Statute on the Physician’s Duty to Take Precautions
Against Patient Violence (1987)
• Framework to guide legislators and courts
• Clear parameters for triggering duty– Patient communicates explicit threat– Kill or seriously injure– Clearly identified or reasonably identifiable victim– Patient has intent and ability to carry out threat
• Reasonable precautions to prevent the threatened harm– Not limited to items below
• Means to discharge as a matter of law– Notification– Seek hospitalization
10
![Page 11: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
California: Duty to Protect
• Thompson v. Alameda (1980): identifiable victim
• First to enact a statute to limit Tarasoff liability (Cal. Civil Code 43.92 (1985))
– Identifiable victim
– Discharge by warning (similar to RCW)
• Jury Instructions on protection (CACI Civil Jury Instruction 503A)
11
![Page 12: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Current Legal LandscapeVolk Study – UW Law School (2017)
• Terminology with inconsistent meaning
• Mandatory obligations
– “Warn and/or protect” (or similar) language: 19 states
– Duty to “warn”: 9 states (may actually include protective measure)
– Duty to “protect”: 5 states
• Permissive breach of confidentiality: 9 states
• Not addressed or no duty: 8 states
• Foreseeability: 1 state besides WA (Wisconsin)
12
![Page 13: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Example: OhioOhio Rev. Code 2305.51
Limits on the duty– Explicit threat– Directly communicated to the clinician– Presents imminent and serious physical harm/death – Clearly identifiable victim– Intent and ability to carry out the threat
Discharge the duty– Initiate efforts to hospitalize (emergent, involuntary, voluntary)– Undertake documented treatment plan and arrange second
opinion– Communicate to law enforcement (and victim if feasible)
13
![Page 14: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Professional Organizations
• Protection of confidentiality is central to mental health care
• Protection of confidentiality is not an absolute
• Ethics guidelines– American Medical Association– American Psychiatric Association– American Counseling Association– National Association of Social Workers– Serious, imminent harm, identifiable person
14
![Page 15: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
![Page 16: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Liability Scheme
MedicalNegligence
Medical Malpractice
Clinician Patient Third Party
![Page 17: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Peterson v. State (Wash. 1983)
Inpatient psychiatrist has a duty to take reasonable precautions to protect anyone who might foreseeably be endangered by his patient
17
![Page 18: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
RCW 71.05.120 (1987)
• This section does not relieve a person from . . . the duty to warn or to take reasonable precautions to provide protection from violent behavior where the patient has communicated an actual threat of physical violence against a reasonably identifiable victim or victims
• Discharge: warn victim and police
18
![Page 19: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Volk v. DeMeerleer
Facts Ruling Response
19
![Page 20: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Facts: Volk v. DeMeerleer
20
![Page 21: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Facts: Volk v. DeMeerleerAdapted from McDermott & Maher (2017)
21
![Page 22: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Facts: Volk v. DeMeerleerAdapted from McDermott & Maher (2017)
22
![Page 23: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Volk: Key Facts
• Episodic treatment over many years
• Homicidal thoughts against his ex-wife years prior, but never acted on them
• Intermittent suicidal thoughts, but never acted on them
• No homicidal thoughts voiced at last appointment
• Killed ex-girlfriend and one of her children, then killed himself
• Facts subsequent to decision
23
![Page 24: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Procedure: Volk v. DeMeerleer
• Suit filed by representatives of the victims
• Psychiatrist granted summary judgment
• Appellate court reversed (2014)– RCW 71.05.120(3) does not apply outside of
involuntary commitment
• Washington Supreme Court upheld appellate court’s reversal of summary judgment (2016)
24
![Page 25: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Volk v. DeMeerleer (Wash. 2016)
Holding:
• A mental health professional is under a duty of reasonable care to act consistently with the standards of the mental health profession in order to protect the foreseeable victims of his or her patient.
• The foreseeability of DeMeerleer’s victims is a question of fact.
25
![Page 26: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Reasoning
• Restatement (Second) of Torts, 315– No duty to control conduct of another unless– Special relationship
• Policy considerations– Control– Safety– Prediction of violence– Least restrictive– Confidentiality/privilege
26
![Page 27: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Key Considerations
• Terms left for clarification
– Special relationship (conceded by Dr. Ashby)
– Dangerous propensities
– Foreseeable victim
• Applicability to various types of clinicians
– act consistently with the standards of the profession
• Did not reconcile common law with the statute
27
![Page 28: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
![Page 29: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Approach
1. What triggers the duty?
2. Who needs protection?
3. How can the duty be discharged?
29
![Page 30: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Comparison
RCW 71.05.120 Volk
When triggered? Actual threat of physical violence
Special relationshipDangerous propensities
Whom is duty owed?
Reasonably identifiablevictim
Foreseeable victim
How is duty discharged?
Warn (clean discharge) or protect
Measure to protect, which can include warning
30
![Page 31: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Additional Comparison
RCW 71.05.120 Volk
Type of violence protected by law
Intentional harm of violence
Broader, may include patient’s negligent behavior
Dangerousness Make a threat Pose a threat
31
![Page 32: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Potential Gaps
• Emergency treatment
• Episodic treatment
• Voluntary hospitalization
32
![Page 33: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Jackson v. City Of Mountlake Terrace (W.D. Wa., 2017)
• Volk not applicable where plaintiffs fail to allege any “definite, established or continuing relationship” between the defendant medical center and the patient
• Single contact insufficient to create any duty running from the clinician or medical center to plaintiffs– Treatment– Prior contacts with provider/facility
33
![Page 34: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
ConsequencesPiel & Opara: AMA J Ethics (2018)
• Outlier among states– Different standards across practice settings– Foreseeability
• Multiple undefined terms – special relationship– dangerous propensities
• Misinterpretation that Volk requires warning
• When warn, risk conflict with privacy laws and ethics codes– Rev. Code Wash. 70.02.050 (2016): Disclosures permitted to avoid or minimize
an imminent danger to patient or another – HIPAA (2016): Disclosure permitted where there exists a serious and imminent
threat
34
![Page 35: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The Psychiatrists’ Program®Cause of Loss – Administrative Lawsuits, Claims, and Lawsuits
1986 - 2016
Primary Allegation All States Washington
Suicide / Attempted Suicide 27% 27%
Incorrect Treatment 24% 26%
Breach of Confidentiality 14% 17%
Other 9% 12%
Medication Issues 8% 6%
Incorrect Diagnosis 5% 3%
Unnecessary Commitment 3% 1%
Improper Supervision 3% 4%
Boundary Violation 2% 1%
Lack of Informed Consent 1% 0%
Duty to Warn / Protect 1% 1%
Forensic 1% 1%
Abandonment 1% 1%
![Page 36: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Means to “protect”Volk v. DeMeerleer (2016), n. 12
Court• Closer monitoring of
medication compliance
• Closer monitoring patient’s mental state
• Increase family involvement
• Warning others of the risk posed by the patient
• Involuntarily hospitalization
Other• Voluntary hospitalization
• Increase frequency of appointments
• Removal of weapons
• Refer to alcohol/substance abuse programs
• Address anger management (therapy)
36
![Page 37: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Response: Court RemedyPiel: JAAPL (2018)
• Amicus brief – Court of Appeals– Washington State Psychological Association
• Amicus brief – State Supreme Court– Washington State Psychological Association– Multiple: WSPA, APA, WSMA, AMA, WSHA et al
• Amicus for motion for reconsideration
• Opinion from Federal Office of Civil Rights
37
![Page 38: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Response: Legislative Remedy
• Coalition of health organizations– Divergent interests (warn)
• HB 1810/SB 5800 (2017)– Consistent with language in RCW 71.05.120– Place in RCW Chapter 7.70 (Regulation of Healthcare)– SB 5800 passed out of Senate Law and Justice Committee. HB 1810 did
not get a hearing in House Judiciary Committee. – 5800 O’Ban Amendment: a) Removal of reasonable precautions from
violent behavior; and b) Change from serious AND imminent to serious OR imminent threat. If passed, would place in RCW 7.05 (Mental Illness)
• Legislative budget provisions in response to Volk – UW Law, 2017– Bree, starting January 2019
38
![Page 39: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
![Page 40: Duty to Protect - The Bree Collaborative · 2019-02-27 · obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim from danger 6. ... •Single contact insufficient to create](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042205/5ea70c5c08ea4229aa3b281f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Jennifer Piel, MD, JD
Assistant Professor
Associate Program Director, Psychiatry Residency
University of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Director, Disruptive Behavior Evaluation Clinic
Staff Psychiatrist
VA Puget Sound, Seattle Division
Legal Digest Editor
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law
Contact: [email protected]
40