Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
Direct measurement of the transverse long-range wake-field ofthe CLIC main linac accelerating structure
G. De Michele1,2,3, E. Adli1,4, A. Grudiev1, A. Latina1, D. Schulte1, W. Wuensch1
1CERN, 2PSI, 3EPFL, 4The University of Oslo
W. WuenschSAREC review meeting
30-31 January 2012
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
MotivationThe main performance issues for the CLIC main linac accelerating structures are:
• Accelerating gradient• Wakefields and higher-order-mode suppression• rf-to-beam efficiency
(The three issues are marvelously interconnected)
The performance of the accelerating structures drives the efficiency and cost of CLIC.
We dedicate significant resources to demonstrate high-gradient performance.
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012Break down rate scaled to 100 MV/m, CLIC pulse
At KEK and at SLAC
High-gradient testing
Status end 1011
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
We now propose an experimental program to investigate long-range wakefields. Why? Do we expect surprises? Well no, but…
Wakefields , and specifically higher-order-mode suppression, is probably being computed very accurately. But we’re currently close to beam dynamics limits and as we push the design towards lower cost we will depend on the accuracy of the simulations more and more.
Also accelerating structures are complex objects, for example with lots of silicon carbide loads. The only experimental verification of a waveguide damped wakefields was in ASSET in late 1999 – we feel it is essential to check our latest design, material choice etc.
Finally the wakefield measurement is a concrete exercise for our beam dynamics team and their tools. It can only be healthy for those dealing with wakefields in simulation to deal with them in a real machine.
Motivation 2
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
There is a long tradition of measuring accelerating structure
wakefields in ASSET
XB-10, ICFA Mini-Workshop, R.M. Jones, Cockcroft Inst., 30th Nov-3rd Dec 2010 66
DS
Qcu
RDDS1
ASSET Data
Conspectus of GLC/NLC Wake Function Predictionand Exp. Measurement (ASSET dots)
DDS3 (inc 10MHz rms errors)DDS1
RDDS1 H60VG4SL17A/B-2 structure interleaved
Refs: 1. R.M. Jones,et al, New J.Phys.11:033013,2009. 2. R.M. Jones et al., Phys.Rev.ST Accel. Beams 9:102001, 2006.3. R.M. Jones, Phys.Rev.ST Accel. Beams, Oct.,2009.
1. GLC/NLC Exp vs Cct Model Wake
An Asset Test of the CLIC Accelerating Structure, PAC2000
Higher-order mode damping demonstration in
ASSET 1999
150 cells/structure, 15 GHz
24 cells/structure, 12 GHz(loads not implemented yet)
Then
NowDouble band circuit model
C L I CC L I C
30 January 2004Alexej Grudiev, GdfidL for TDS wakefield calculations
Full length TDS results comparison
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
The CLIC baseline accelerating structure and its wakefield
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
The CLIC baseline structure
Average loaded accelerating gradient 100 MV/mFrequency 12 GHzRF phase advance per cell 2π/3 rad.Average iris radius to wavelength ratio 0.11Input, Output iris radii 3.15, 2.35 mmInput, Output iris thickness 1.67, 1.00 mmInput, Output group velocity 1.65, 0.83 % of cFirst and last cell Q-factor (Cu) 5536, 5738First and last cell shunt impedance 81, 103 MΩ/mNumber of regular cells 26Structure length including couplers 230 mm (active)Bunch spacing 0.5 nsBunch population 3.72×109
Number of bunches in the train 312Filling time, rise time 67 ns, 21 nsTotal pulse length 243.7 nsPeak input power 61.3 MWRF-to-beam efficiency 28.5 %Maximum surface electric field 230 MV/mMaximum pulsed surface heating temperature rise
45 K
Hs/EaEs/Ea Sc/Ea2
Wakefield simulations• Different EM codes have been used to simulate the wake-
fields in the CLIC RF prototype with dispersive materials: GdfidL, CST Particle Studio®, ACE3P
• Different materials (i.e. different EM properties) have been tested in order to meet the beam dynamics requirements
11
CST: superPC, 128 GB of RAM and 24 CPUs
GdfidL: distributed and shared memory
Transversewake-field
The predicted wake-field
12
Transversereal impedance
Transversewake-field
Three main dipolar bands in theImpedance spectrum
Absolute valueof the envelope ofthe transverse wake
2nd bunch
What we need from measurements
• Roll-off speed to be confirmed up to 0.25m• Wake-field threshold• Identification of frequencies from wake-field
measurements: high sampling of the wake-fields with the witness bunch
13
Roll-off
threshold
14
Critical issue for simulation in time domain: dispersive materials• GdfidL
– The permittivity can be expressed with an N-th order Lorentz medium with resonant angular frequencies ωn and damping angular frequencies γn:
– This feature has been debugged in late 2011!
• CST 2012 version– the transient solver has undergone many improvements, in particular with respect to,
e.g., broadband constant loss tangent. The broadband sensitivity analysis with respect to geometry and material property variation has also been enhanced.
4th order Lorentz medium
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
Wakefield measurements of the CLIC baseline accelerating structure in ASSET/FACET
• Possibility of having driving and witness bunches with positrons and electrons.
• Adjustable bunch spacing for a timing span behind the driving bunch.
• Bunch length flexibility: ideally shorter than 1mm in order to resolve the 3rd dipole band which shows up a peak around 40GHz.
16
Why FACET?
Layout of the ASSET facility
POSSIBLE LOCATION
Where in FACET
17
ASSETCLASSE
LI02 sector
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
Young people from the CLIC study (not me) are becoming familiar with the linac and the wakefield
measurement
Experimental procedure
19
dw
ccdw
y ytWE
eeLQqwd
22
22
tW
dy
wq
dQ
LwE
transverse wakefield
drive bunch offsetwitness charge
drive bunch charge
active length of the structureenergy of the witness bunch
The transverse wake-field can be extrapolated from the measurements of the deflecting angle of the witness bunch
y
d
wdrive bunch lengthwitness bunch length
Transversewakefield
y
Experiment simulations with tracking code PLACET
• BPMs upstream and downstream of thestructure are needed in order to determine the bunch offset in the structure, as well asdipole corrector magnets to generate this offset.
• only BPMs downstream of correctors are sensitive to the correction itself. That means that the lattice response is triangular.
20
Response matrix from thesouth extraction kicker in SRD to LI02
A. LatinaG. De Michele
21
Positrons: offset scan to drive wakefield
The BPMs just before and after the RF prototype are LI02, 201 and LI02, 211. The correctors used are only two upstream these two BPMs. With only two correctors seems possible to shift the positron beam in the RF prototype. To be verified the maximum voltage that can be applied to the correctors.
Electrons: Deflected by wakefield• We can compute the witness bunch deflections from betatron oscillation
fits to data from the BPMs downstream of the test structure, and corrected for incoming orbit jitter using the results from similar fits to data from BPMs in the NRTL line [C. Adolphsen et al., PRL 74 13, 1995]
• For the fit of trajectory parameters, one needs the knowledge of BPM locations and lattice parameters, i.e. quantities which have no stochastic errors. For the fit of lattice parameters, however, one has to correlate BPM data with trajectory parameters, i.e. quantities which will in general have significant stochastic noise components. In this case, the fit must take into account the noise on the measured trajectory parameters due to finite BPM resolution [SLAC-CN—371].
• Once we have simulated all the experiment with the tracking code PLACET, our routines will be Interfaced with the SLAC Control Program (SCP). Hopefully in March 2012 first tests.
22
23
BPMs resolutionFrom the experiment proposal:
An accurate data analysis is required
• Good knowledge of the optics is essential• Orbit fit to determine the kick
y
Lattice simulations and verification in 2012 run
• The experiment can be reproduced numerically with all imperfections. Data acquisition as well as data analysis can be simulated.
• From the physical point of view the experiment can be completely simulated.
• We have only deal with technical problems and software integration on SCP.
24
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
The test structure – a simplified assembly since the dipole mode
Q’s are low
main strongback in the ASSET area
FACET prototype scheme
26
• six TD26 accelerating structures• simple vacuum tank• no power will be sent to the test structure and the double feed couplers will be terminated by the loads
• clamped aluminum cells• available length: 76.80 inches
vacuum tank
1.5m
76.80 inches
beam pipe transition
bellow
vacuum
pump
vacuum
pump
Support and alignment system
vacuumflange
ASAS
ASAS
ASAS
CLIC accelerating structure for ASSET
6 sections, 24 cells each, compact coupler designClamped aluminum disksTo be tested at SLAC
Ø180mm
TD26 with Compact Couplers (x6), clamped
Cell shape accuracy 20µm
Aluminium diskDamping
material (SiC)
Threaded rod for AS clamping
Clamp for SiC fixation
Aluminium disks
Features for Tank alignment on the girder
Features for AS alignment in the Tank
Reference spheres BEAMA. Solodko
• Uses existing vacuum tank • Estimated total load of the CERN installation is about 400 kg• Two vacuum ion pumps (noble diode pumps, 53-55 l/s)• The RF structure is aligned mechanically inside the vacuum tank• The vacuum tank will be aligned to the beam axis by means of adjustable feet
(drawings needed)• Two tooling balls on both ends are present on top of the vacuum tank
28
Mechanical design: features
CLIC meeting Walter Wuensch 6 May 2011
What full prototype cells look likeMachining: OFHC copper diamond milled and turned disks with micron
precision.
+- 5 micron tolerance lines
G. Riddone, S. Atieh
• Available longitudinal space 76.80inches• RF structure disks diameter: 180mm• RF structure longitudinal dimensions: 6 X
250mm• Beam pipe: 1inch outer diameter• Vacuum flanges: 2 ¾ inches• Distance between beam-pipe center to main
strongback: 8.795inches• Accelerating cell inner radius: 2.35mm
30
Mechanical design: dimensions
Walter Wuensch SAREC review meeting 30-31 January 2012
Schedules
32
Coordination with FACET runs(may already be obsolete)
• 2012 - CLIC personnel participate in linac measurements in preparation for wakefield measurements.
• 2013 - After commissioning of positrons, we have two options:– Re-measure the installed DDS then install the CLIC RF
structure– Install and measure only the CLIC RF structure
• But in any case the CLIC RF structure will be ready for September 2012.
Overall Schedule2012 2013
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Changing machine parameters and BPMs data acquisitionShipping of the CERN prototype to SLACFinal assembly at SLAC
Re-measurements of the DDS structures which are still in place in LI02InstallationDirect measurements of wake-fields for CLIC RF structure
33