8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 1/19
1
Writing failure: aristocratic self-depiction in seventeenth-century France
Jonathan Dewald
University at Buffalo
Almost fifty years ago, Georg Misch described the French aristocratic memoir as
"die verbreitetste Form, in der sich die höfische-politische Gesellschaft aussprach."1 His
comment referred to the fact that in mid-seventeenth-century France, nobles from a
variety of milieux wrote out their life stories, and these attracted a wide readership.2 So
did closely-related forms of aristocratic writing: literary portraits, novels in which
aristocratic authors and their friends appeared in flimsy disguises, personal letters,
essays.3 Any account of seventeenth-century aristocratic culture has to come to terms
with this flurry of ego-writing, for it constituted the primary form of French nobles'
engagement in artistic endeavor.4
Antoine Furetière's 1690 dictionary seems to offer a straightforward way of
understanding the memorialists' enterprise, by underlining the place within the genre of
politics, power, and public life: "MEMOIRES, au pluriel, se dit des Livres d'Historiens,
1 Georg Misch: Geschichte der Autobiographie, IV, 2. Von der Renaissance bis zu den
autobiographischen Hauptwerken des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts, Frankfurt a.M. 1969, p.
762.
2 Christian Jouhaud, Dinah Ribard, Nicolas Schapira: Histoire, Littérature, Témoignage.
Ecrire les malheurs du temps, Paris 2009, p. 44-45, on the vogue for memoirs after 1660.
3 Essential orientation is provided by Marc Fumaroli's three classic essays on the memoir
genre, repr. in Fumaroli: La diplomatie de l'esprit. De Montaigne à La Fontaine, Paris
1998, p. 183-281. On the close relationship between the aristocratic memoir and the
novel, see Roger Zuber and Micheline Cuénin: Littérature française 4. La classicisme,
Paris 1993, p. 187-213.
4 The genre also distinguished aristocratic culture in France from that of other European
societies: Fumaroli: La diplomatie, 1998 (see fn 3), p. viii, 189.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 2/19
2
escrits par ceux qui ont eu part aux affaires ou qui en ont esté tesmoins oculaires, ou qui
contiennent leur vie ou leurs principales actions." Memoir-writing thus concerned "ceux
qui ont eu part aux affaires," and, though it might include other aspects of their lives, it
usually dealt with "leurs principales actions."5 That subordination of personal to public
doings underlies a distinction still present in most histories of autobiography, between the
externalized self-depictions of the seventeenth century and the authentically
autobiographical writing that Jean-Jacques Rousseau pioneered a century later. In his
pioneering reflections on the genre, for instance, the French literary critic Philippe
Lejeune speaks of "l'écriture du moi qui s'est dévéloppé dans le monde occidental depuis
le XVIIIe siècle;" and he suggests that the modern concept of autobiography becomes
relevant only for works written after 1770.6 On this view, the memorialists' version of
selfhood expressed the values of a society of orders, in which both the legitimacy of self-
expression and the nature of the self being described derived ultimately from social
status. Only those who had significant deeds to present had the right to speak of
themselves, and only those of high social standing were likely to perform such deeds.7 At
the same time, speaking of oneself helped constitute and consolidate status. It
proclaimed the individual's public importance, as an actor whose deeds the public would
find interesting, while at the same time displaying mastery of the literary skills that the
seventeenth century increasingly prized.8
5 Antoine Furetière: Dictionaire universelle, 2 vols., Rotterdam 1690, unpaginated, s.v.
6 Philippe Lejeune: Le pacte autobiographique, new ed., Paris 1996, p. 7, 13-14.
7 Misch: Geschichte der Autobiographie, 1969 (see fn. 1), p. 777-778.
8 Nicolas Schapira: Un professionel des lettres au XVIIe siècle. Valentin Conrart, une
histoire sociale, Paris 2003, p. 14-17, 59, 71.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 3/19
3
This paper questions the apparently straightforward distinction between
seventeenth-century exteriority and late-Enlightenment introspection, by looking closely
at some of the ways in which aristocratic memoirs depict public action. I focus on the
central place within the genre of the narrators' own failures. Bassompierre, Retz, La
Rochefoucauld, Bussy-Rabutin, and other memoir writers organize their life stories
according to a basic pattern. The aristocratic actor-narrator begins his career with
significant advantages, considerable natural abilities, and reasonable hopes of an
important career; he plans well and acts intelligently. But in the end these efforts come to
nothing, and the narrator finds himself excluded from power and influence, and often
facing financial troubles and exile. The life story becomes a tale of unexpected decline,
from promising beginnings to a compromised authorial present. Scholars have typically
interpreted these failure narratives as essentially descriptive, reflecting the political
realities of the seventeenth century. Nobles often wrote about their careers during the
enforced leisure of political disgrace; even less dire circumstances might lead them to
efforts at narrative self-justification, in response to critics or royal ingratitude. The state's
growing monopoly on authority also led nobles to reflect on their place in society, and to
defend values that seemed out of touch with the new order. 9
Clearly such external circumstances mattered in shaping the memoir genre. But
in their emphasis on them, scholars have tended to neglect failure's narrative centrality, as
a theme around which aristocrats organized their self-depictions. La Rochefoucauld in
fact opens his memoirs by explaining that his youthful conduct "commença une longue
9 Fumaroli: La diplomatie, 1998 (see fn. 3), p. 190-193, 201; Jouhaud et al.: Histoire,
littérature, témoignage, 2009 (see fn. 2), p. 40-49, arguing that Bassompierre's memoirs
constitute a response to the developing trauma of imprisonment.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 4/19
4
suite de disgrâces, dont ma vie a été agitée;10 failure is here offered as the theme of a life
story, and the reader is immediately alerted to the fact. Bussy-Rabutin offers failure as
the explanation for his memoir's very existence; "les malheurs qui me sont arrivez,
pouvant laisser croire que je les meritois," he writes in the opening to his account, have
required that he explain himself to the public. 11 Understanding failure in this way brings
to the fore aspects of the memoirs that otherwise remain hidden. In reflecting on their
failures, the memoir writers necessarily reflect also on their troubled relationship to the
society in which they act, whose expectations they have somehow not met. The theme of
failure thus raises the theme of alienation, pointing as it does to the isolation within the
social order of even those in the highest social and economic ranks. Even they cannot
fully master society's codes. In this sense, their artistic efforts serve not to affirm their
place in society, but to underline its uncertainties.
I develop these interpretations through close examination of a specific case, that
of Henri de Rohan, a great Breton nobleman and Bourbon cousin. Born in 1579, Rohan
came from the high Breton nobility, and (by virtue of an early sixteenth-century
marriage) he was a cousin of Henri IV, who raised him to the eminence of duc et pair and
conferred on him other court favors. After the king's death, Rohan became the last great
political leader of French Protestantism. During the 1620s, he and his younger brother
the duc de Soubise led three Protestant rebellions in the south of France, finally agreeing
to a definitive treaty with the king in 1629, some months after the fall of La Rochelle. As
10 François de La Rochefoucauld: Maximes, mémoires, oeuvres diverses, Paris 2001, p.
872.
11 Roger de Rabutin: Les memoires de messire Roger de Rabutin comte de Bussy, 2
vols., Paris 1696, vol. 1, p. 1-2.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 5/19
5
part of that agreement, Rohan left France for exile in Venice, returning for only one brief
visit. But he remained in close touch with French affairs, partly through his wife, who
continued to reside mainly in Paris; and in 1634 Richelieu gave him an important military
position, leading a French-sponsored army charged with blocking the Alpine passes
against the Habsburgs. Rohan enjoyed some brilliant successes, winning a series of
battles against the imperial armies, but ultimately his mission proved a failure; his under-
paid Swiss allies rebelled and shifted their allegiance to the Empire. Having lost
Richelieu's trust and believing himself in danger of imprisonment, Rohan fled first to
Geneva, then to the army of Bernard de Saxe-Weimar; he died in 1638, of wounds
incurred while fighting as a private soldier in Bernard's army.12 His example is especially
worth considering because of the abundance of his other writings, formal and informal.
Throughout his life, he commented at length on events as they unfolded, and we can
often compare his retrospective accounts with what he thought at the time. His memoirs,
so the comparison suggests, expressed Rohan's stance toward politics from the very
outset of his career, not the disillusion of defeat and exile.13
* * * * * * *
12 Two solid biographies are available: Jack Alden Clarke: Huguenot Warrior: The Life
and Times of Henri de Rohan, 1579-1638, The Hague,1966; and Pierre and Solange
Deyon: Henri de Rohan: huguenot de plume et d'épée, 1579-1638, Paris 2000. For a
somewhat different perspective, Jonathan Dewald: "Rohan's World: A Political Culture
in Seventeenth-Century France," in: Jörn Leonhard and Christian Wieland, (Ed).: WhatMakes the Nobility Noble? Comparative Perspectives from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth
Century, Göttingen 2011.
13 This paper derives from two larger projects. In focusing on aristocratic memory and
self-depiction, it continues a line of inquiry that I began in my book Aristocratic
Experience and the Origins of Modern Culture: France, 1570-1715, Berkeley and Los
Angeles 1993; in focusing on Henri de Rohan, it builds on my current research, a book-
length study of the Rohan family in the seventeenth century.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 6/19
6
The memoir genre fascinated Rohan throughout his life. From childhood on, he
regularly reread Julius Caesar's Commentaries; late in life, while in exile in Venice, he
prepared his own summary of them, interspersed with advice for the contemporary
military leader.14 Soon after, while traveling in Switzerland, he arranged for the shipment
by mule of four boxes of his books, and these included the memoirs of Commynes, Du
Bellay, Monluc, Duplessis-Mornay, Villars, Villeroy, and others. The secretaries listed all
save Monluc's as "mémoires," suggesting that they constituted a coherent category within
his library.15 In keeping with this interest in others' self-depictions, Rohan himself wrote
two long memoirs of his own, the first dealing with his leadership of the Huguenot
movement, the second with his campaigns in the Valteline. One was published in the
decade after his death, and both apparently circulated widely in Parisian high society.16
Both texts fully conform to Furetière's definition of the genre, for they deal
exclusively with public events. Indeed, Rohan's self-narration only begins with the death
of Henri IV, the point at which he himself assumed a leading role in French politics.
14 Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Manuscrits Français 4107, La vie de Henri duc de
Rohan, f. 3 r-v; Charles Pradel, Ed.: Mémoires de J. de Bouffard-Madiane sur les
guerres civiles du duc de Rohan, Paris-Toulouse-Albi 1897, p. 75. The product of his
studies of Caesar, Le parfait capitaine, was published in 1636, two years before Rohan
died.
15 Bibliothèque Publique et Universitaire, Geneva, Manuscrits Tronchin, 21: f. 47-48; the
secretaries adopted Monluc's own designation of his memoirs as Commentaires, in
imitation of Julius Caesar. Their terminology matters because of recent debate about the
coherence of the memoir genre: cf. Jouhaud et al.: Histoire, littérature, témoignage,2009 (see fn. 2), p. 25-40, who argue that the genre is chiefly a modern and artificial
creation.
16 The first was published in 1644, six years after Rohan's death, with further editions
beginning in 1646; the second was only published in the mid-eighteenth century. On
contemporary awareness of them, Gédéon Tallemant des Réaux: Historiettes, Ed.
Antoine Adam: 2 vols., Paris 1960-1961, vol 1, p. 621. Tallemant also uses the term
"Mémoires" to describe the work.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 7/19
7
Such a starting point, with the author already over thirty, precludes even posing the
fundamental question of Rousseauian autobiography, that of how the author became
himself, the finished personality now composing the work. 17 Nor does Rohan say much
about family or personal life. His wife, mother, and sister appear only when they too play
public roles. Even the personal emotions by which Retz and La Rochefoucauld so often
explain their own and others' behavior are entirely absent from Rohan's account. In the
same spirit, Rohan (following Caesar) avoids the first-person voice, while noting in
occasional asides his commitment to preserving the memory of great deeds, his own and
others'. Having described the heroic deaths of a small platoon of his soldiers, he
concludes: "les noms de ces pauvres Soldats meritent leur place dans l'Histoire, leur
action estant comparable aux actions plus (sic) memorables de l'Antiquité."18 By its
resistance to the crown, the city of La Rochelle "a acquis par sa constance une plus
longue vie dans la renommée des siecles à venir, que celles qui aujourd'huy prospèrent
dans le siècle present."19 His mother's constancy in prison "sera à la postérité un exemple
illustre d'une vertu sans exemple, & d'une piété admirable."20
Such stories of exemplary behavior place Rohan within an old tradition, that of
the historian as recorder of great deeds, writing with ancient examples in mind. But a
second theme in his memoirs creates more complicated effects. Throughout, instances of
17 It is worth noting in this context that Rohan would not have known Augustine's
Confessions, since a French translation appeared only after his death, in 1650; Fumaroli:La diplomatie, 1998 (see fn 3), 204-205.
18 Henri de Rohan: Memoires du duc de Rohan Sur les choses advenues en France
Depuis la mort de Henri le Grand, Paris 1665, p. 160.
19 Ibid., p. 300.
20 Ibid., p. 300.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 8/19
8
memorable virtue acquire some of their brilliancy from the dark context in which they are
set, a harsh social world in which bonds of community are weak and promises unreliable.
Rohan presents this theme in his memoir's first sentence: "Après la mort de Henri le
Grand chacun pensa à ses affaires." The queen-mother and the ministers sought to hold
on to power; "les autres Grands" sought "à se relever de l'abbaissement, auquel le règne
precedent les avoit soûmis. Parmi tout cela les haines s'exerçoient, et les plus habiles se
servoient de la passion des autres pour ruiner l'autorité de ceux qui diminuoient la leur."21
Through the remainder of the text, Rohan offers a long series of examples to
confirm these opening themes. Friends prove false; money and hopes of advancement
triumph over promises of loyalty; even religious commitments prove unstable. The effect
is the more chilling in that Rohan uncouples these self-interested betrayals from other
forms of social evaluation. A Protestant "Gentilhomme de qualité & de bon esprit"
betrays his erstwhile patron.22 Much higher in the social hierarchy, the maréchal de
Bouillon similarly combines personal excellence with villainy; "grand de courage &
d'entendement, capable de procurer à un Estat de grands biens & de grands maux,"23
Bouillon uses his abilities only to establish himself at the center of power, lying and
betraying his friends along the way. Similar judgments apply to Protestant elites at large:
Rohan finds arrayed against him "tous les Grands de la Religion de France, soit par envie
ou peu de zele, tous les Officiers du Roy à cause de leur avarice, & la pluspart des
principaux des villes, gagnez par les appas de la cour."24
21 Ibid., p. 1-2.
22 Ibid., p. 13-14.
23 Ibid., p. 3.
24 Ibid., p. 179-180.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 9/19
9
Ordinary people offer no counter-weight to the amorality of the notables. They
appear very often in Rohan's memoirs, for Protestant successes depended heavily on the
engagement of the urban crowd and middle classes. Such men are sincere in their faith,
Rohan emphasizes, but they lack the capacity to see events clearly and respond correctly
to them, and thus are easily swept into momentary enthusiasms. The citizens of La
Rochelle are typical, "peu iudicieux..., & suivant l'humeur des peuples, aussi insolens en
prosperité qu'abattus en adversite."25 "Les peuples... (he adds at a later point) sont faciles
à croire mal des gens de bien, & à croire bien des meschans, s'accordans volontiers avec
ces criards qui blasment tout & ne font rien, & qui cachent leur hypocrisie d'un zele
indiscret & seditieux à la Religion & à la liberté."26
Rohan himself cannot stand aloof from this pervasive ethical disorder; survival in
such an environment requires adaptation to it. Throughout his narrative, he remains loyal
to his own principles and to the real needs of the Reformed community— but defending
these requires its own forms of deception, manipulation, and brute force, often exercised
against his co-religionists. Faced with wavering in one of the cities that his forces
control, Rohan pretends to negotiate. But having "esprouvé diverses fois, comme sur ces
amusemens de negociation on avoit toujours tasché de le surprendre," he in fact
strengthens his "cabale" in the city and introduces a local gentleman "pour se mettre à la
teste de ses partisans;" eventually his cabale takes over. 27 The story is similar in the city
of Montauban. His designated lieutenant there "ayant pour ennemis non seulement ceux
25 Ibid., p. 163.
26 Ibid., p. 338.
27 Ibid., p. "173," in fact p. 169.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 10/19
10
qui avoient un dessein contraire au sien, mais aussi quelques rivaux qui sous main lui
rendoient de mauvais offices; il en surmonta une partie par prudence & dissimulation;
aux autres, il y fallut apporter la force & la severité." 28
Against such moments of political maneuvering, the narrative offers strikingly
few invocations of religious faith. Rohan notes (apparently with some amusement) the
Rochelais's belief that they might resolve their troubles by collective prayer;29 the
account of his second war concludes with the reflection that "quand nous serons plus gens
de bien, Dieu nous assistera plus puissamment."30 But such evocations of God's presence
are rare and ambiguous, and they almost never occur in the course of the action itself. In
the fallen world that he describes, God's influence rarely offers a plausible explanation for
the course of events, any more than aristocratic honor or popular loyalty.
In such a world, the narrative suggests, political failure is a likely outcome, for
even the most thoughtful analyst cannot fully understand its mechanisms or predict its
evolution. Hence Rohan repeatedly uses the terminology of incomprehensibility to
summarize the outcomes to which his own actions have led. Already in 1616, well before
his three major rebellions, he finds himself "haï en Cour, toutes choses lui ayant succedé
au contraire de son dessein."31 His second memoir, on the wars of the Valteline, similarly
emphasizes the disjuncture between insight and successful action. "Rohan ne voyoit pas
seulement l'appareil qui se faisoit contre lui..., mais même, par lettres interceptées ... étoit
informé bien particulièrement du dessein" of his enemies; "Mais ces lumières
28 Ibid., p. 260.
29 Ibid., p. 206-207.
30 Ibid., p. 18.
31 Ibid., p. 57.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 11/19
11
n'apportoient pas remède à la foiblesse en laquelle il se trouvoit."32 In the end the lesson
is again one of helplessness: "Le duc de Rohan, tournant par son esprit l'état auquel il se
trouvoit réduit, ne voyoit aucune ressource pour sortir du labyrinthe dans lequel il étoit
plongé."33 Here as throughout his accounts, failure derives less from a particular chain of
events than from the organization of society itself.
* * * * * * *
Can this dark social vision be viewed as more than a reflection of the
circumstances in which Rohan wrote? He composed each memoir in the aftermath of
defeat: the first, during his time of exile in Venice, following the final collapse of the
Huguenot movement that he had led; the second, after the failure of his leadership in the
Valteline had produced local rebellion and the threat of arrest if he returned to France. In
these situations, he like other aristocratic memoir writers had to reflect on the causes of
failure; viewing social actors as self-interested and political situations as illegible offered
one way of doing so. But in Rohan's case, more than for most memoir-writers,
comparison with earlier views is possible, for he had produced occasional political
analyses throughout his adult life. In about 1601, he composed a book-length account of
his grand tour through Europe, presenting his thoughts on the varied political situations
he had encountered; and after 1610, as he contended for leadership of the Huguenot
32 M. Petitot (Ed).: Mémoires du duc de Rohan sur la guerre de la Valteline, Paris 1822
(Collection des mémoires relatifs à l'histoire de France, vol 19), p. 87.
33 Ibid., p. 199.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 12/19
12
movement, there was a regular stream of "discours," describing the contemporary scene
and suggesting how his co-religionists might best respond to it.34
These earlier writings demonstrate the fundamental consistency of his views
throughout his political career, for from the outset he had presented self-interest and envy
as the main forces moving most political actors. In 1611, he comments that "nostre
lascheté est telle" that, rather strive to maintain the Huguenot movement intact, "nous
taschons de nous surplanter et portons plus denvie a ladvancement de nos freres qua
celuy de nos ennemys." In 1615, he describes the royal officials "couvrans leur interest
particulier sous le manteau du bien publiq."35 In 1617, he describes "l'esprit de lhomme"
as "insatiable, presomptueux, et envieux, qui bien souvent se fasche plus du bien et des
honneurs que son compagnon possede que de ce quil n'en jouit pas, mais cest selon la
force ou foiblesse de l'estat quilz le font plus ou moingz paroistre."36 Another discourse
of the same year opens by noting that "L'eloquence qui ne touche les interetz de ceux
quon veut persuader a ordinairement peu deffet envers eux...," and then reverts to the
theme of men's insatiable ambitions: "personne ne peut respondre de soy jusqu'ou la
convoitise, de commander souverainemt le peut porter sil ne la essayé." In 1618, he
worried about those "esprits inquiets" who, moved by "mescontantemens, envies ou
ambition ne peuvent se contanter de leur condition presente...." 37 Rohan's assumptions
about human nature and political action in fact changed little between 1611 and 1638.
34 Only some of these texts were immediately published, but they all circulated widely, assuggested by the numerous manuscript copies that survive.
35 Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Manuscrits Français 4101, Huit discours du duc
Henri de Rohan, p. 156, 175.
36 Ibid., p. 190.
37 Ibid., p. 179, 181, 196.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 13/19
13
Though primarily addressed to the Protestant community, Rohan's discourses also
present a world in which God's actions can rarely be detected. To be sure, in his 1622
discourse following the first of his wars, he emphasizes "la ferme résolution que Dieu m'a
donnée de m'employer tout entier au bien de son service... j'embrasserai toujours d'un
coeur franc la cause de Dieu, et réputerai à gloire de souffrir pour son nom."38 In the
discourse of 1611, composed soon after Henri IV's assassination, he similarly urges that
"cette mortelle vie ne se doit employer que pour acquerir l'Eternelle." Yet even this
invocation of religious purpose focuses on the need for individual action rather than on
God's provident arrangement of human affairs. While he lived, the discourse explains,
Henri IV had protected his former comrades in the Reformed movement; "Il faut a cette
heure que ce soit nostre vertu, Dieu la retiré afin que nostre recours ne fut plus en
luy....Quelle plus ambitieuse gloire pouvons nous recercher que de servir" God's cause?39
In this analysis, the religous character of his movement only serves to sharpen Rohan's
focus on the individual, now given the opportunity for heroic action in hostile
circumstances.
Divine providence counts for even less in his youthful account of his European
tour. The book consists mainly of naive, wide-eyed reports on the cultural monuments
that he and his companions visited, but Rohan adds to these his reflections on
contemporary politics and social arrangements as well. The work shows him already
rather detached in his religious commitments, warmer in his praise of Catholic Venice
and Munich than of the Protestant societies he visited. Italy as a whole seems to him
38 Ibid., p. 282.
39 Ibid., p. 154, 153.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 14/19
14
"plus civilisée, plus gentille, plus attrayante, non seulement que l'Allemande, mais
qu'aucune Nation que i'aye pratiquée."40 He notes the activity and wealth that he has
encountered in the Netherlands—but does not suggest any connection between these and
the region's Protestant commitments. Rather, religion appears in the text as mainly a
political problem: nations' religious unity is a key to their political strength, and religious
disunity inevitably produces weakness, though he also notes Scotland's good fortune in
combining religious unity with belief in the true religion, the Reform. Coming only a
few years after the Edict of Nantes, from the leader of a great Protestant family, this was
a strong statement of doctrinal indifference, with critical implications about the religious
minority to which he himself belonged.41 The text expresses an equally Machiavellian
commitment to political particularism: "autant de fois que vous changez de païs, autant
trouvez-vous de diverses humeurs, & par consequent diverses sortes de gouvernemens ...
ie vous dis qu'il y a une dissemblance tres-grande du gouvernement de chaque Royaume
ou Republique de la Chrestienté: ... & tel sera docteur passé pour les affaires du
gouvernement d'Espagne, qui ne seroit qu'un Asne du commencement venant en
France."42 No divine order accounts for this diversity. It results instead from the
multiplicity of human temperaments.
Rohan's circumstances after his 1629 defeat thus did not fundamentally reshape
his values, or even his political language. Their principal effect lay rather in encouraging
modes of thought that he had already pursued—and this less because of the experience of
40 Henri de Rohan: Voyage de monsieur le duc de Rohan Fait en l'An 1600, published
with the 1665 edition of the Mémoires (see fn. 38), separately paginated, p. 222-224, 365.
41 Ibid., p. 373.
42 Ibid., p. 342-343.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 15/19
15
failure than because of the new surroundings in which he chose to place himself.
Required by his treaty with the crown to leave France, he selected Venice as his
residence, dividing his time between a palace in the city and the nearby university town
of Padua. In one sense, the choice was unsurprising. He had long admired Italy and
Italian culture, and as a young man had found Venice especially delightful; in summing
up his visit there in 1600, he described the city as "un des cabinets des merveilles du
monde: duquel ie suis party aussi ravy & content tout ensemble de l'avoir veuë, que triste
d'y avoir demeuré si peu, meritant non trois ou quatre semaines, mais un siecle pour la
considerer à l'égal de ce qu'elle merite."43 In addition, Venice appealed because of its
political centrality. The city lay near one focal point of the Thirty Years War, and thus
offered at least the hope of military activity. Though he occasionally described himself in
these years as having withdrawn from political activity, in fact almost immediately after
arriving in Venice he had asked Richelieu to assist him in securing a position leading its
army.44 Establishing himself in Venice expressed Rohan's determination to stay at the
center of European international politics, despite the failure of the Huguenot movement.
But the choice also expressed Rohan's openness to receiving cultural influences
that accorded awkwardly with his Protestant beliefs. For all its liberalism, Venice of
course was Catholic, at a time of growing papal intolerance of intellectual deviation.
There had been the episode of the Venetian Interdict, not long after Rohan's first visit; the
Galileo affair would erupt soon after Rohan selected Venice for his exile. Of course there
was no lack of Protestant alternatives. His brother Benjamin, duc de Soubise, set himself
43 Rohan: Voyage (see fn.40), p. 224.
44 Pierre Grillon: Les papiers de Richelieu. Section politque intérieure, correspondance
et papiers d'Etat, 6 vols., Paris 1975-1985, vol. 4, p. 558, 579.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 16/19
16
up in England, and the family had connections elsewhere in Protestant Europe.45 The
choice of Venice displayed, yet again, the secular orientations of Rohan's outlook.
His stays in Padua expressed that secularism even more strongly, for its university
was known throughout Europe as a center of free-thinking. Yet so comfortable did Rohan
find this environment that he actually established two residences there, in addition to his
palace in Venice itself, the one a large house and gardens in the city, the other a small
villa outside it.46 Not surprisingly, intellectual engagement ensued: by 1631, Rohan had
fallen in with an extreme example of the Paduan outlook, Benjamin Priolo, a wandering
French intellectual who had traveled there to study medicine. Contemporaries described
Priolo as an intellectual adventurer, learned, brilliant, persuasive, and amoral.47 He soon
became Rohan's physician, then his principal secretary and advisor, and their association
continued to the end of Rohan's life. Some of Priolo's appeal was practical, for "ayant
une grande connoissance des langues et des principales affaires de l'Europe, [Priolo]
estoit capable de le servir par tout;"48 he served Rohan as emissary to the French court,
financial manager, and intimate political adviser. But above all he offered Rohan cultural
45 On the Europe-wide connections among Protestant aristocrats, Sonja Kmec: "'A
Stranger Born': Female Usage of International Networks in Times of War," in: Glenn
Richardson (Ed.): "The Contending Kingdoms." France and England 1420-1700,
Aldershot and Burlington 2008, p. 147-160. One of Rohan's sisters had married a
German prince; there had also been unsuccessful efforts to marry his youngest sister to a
prince of the Nassau house, and to marry Rohan himself to a Swedish princess.
46 Auguste Laugel: Henry de Rohan: son rôle politique et militaire sous Louis XIII
(1579-1638), Paris 1889, 425 (letter from Marguerite de Bethune to Catherine deParthenay, 7 January 1631).
47 M. E. Reveillaud (Ed): Véritables faits et gestes du seigneur Benjamin Prioleau, La
Rochelle 1909, p. 28, 30-44; on the extent of his influence on Rohan, p. 54-55. See also
Gustave Chéneau: Un agent secret de Mazarin: Benjamin Priolo (1602-1667), La
Rochelle 1908, p. 47, 52-53.
48 Reveillaud (Ed.): Véritables faits et gestes, 1909 (see fn. 47), p. 28.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 17/19
17
guidance. In 1631 Rohan had already written his mother about "une traduction qu'a faite
mon médecin (Priolo) de Lucain ... qui est la plus belle chose possible," 49 and he
continued to play this role thereafter; some scholars have claimed that Priolo actually
composed Rohan's memoirs on the Valteline campaign.50 Whatever the secretary's
specific contributions to the project, both of Rohan's memoirs were written with Padua
and Priolo in the background.
Such circumstances counted for more as Rohan composed his memoirs than the
recent experience of political disappointment. Indeed, it was at this point that
Machiavelli became an explicit influence on his thinking: alongside his collection of
memoirs, the list of his books shows, by the early 1630s he had acquired The Prince, The
Art of War, and the History of Florence, along with two works of Guicciardini.51
Machiavellian themes dominated his other major writing project from these years, De
l'intérêt des princes, his adaptation of Machiavellian principles of statecraft to
contemporary conditions.52 But even the influence of context, conversation, and reading
did not fundamentally redirect Rohan's thinking. Rather, they provided clarity and
intellectual legitimacy to beliefs that he had already expressed throughout his career:
about the imperfect fit between individual virtue and collective life, the difficulty of
assessing political forces, and the likelihood that able, astute actors would fail in the end.
49 Laugel: Henri de Rohan, 1889 (see fn. 46), p. 400-401 (letter to Catherine de
Parthenay, 14 May 1631).
50 C.-A. Sainte-Beuve: Causeries du lundi, 3rd edition, Paris n.d., p. 298-355, 344; .
Petitot (Ed).: Mémoires (see fn. 32), p. 3, arguing for Rohan's sole authorship.
51 BPU Geneva, MS Tronchin 21 (see fn. 25), ff. 47-48.
52 A recent edition provides an overview of the book's history and significance: Henri de
Rohan: De l'intérêt des princes et des Estats de la chrétienté, Christian Lazzeri (Ed).:
Paris 1995.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 18/19
18
Having worked with Priolo some years after Rohan's death, Mazarin himself speculated
on the direct of influence between them. Perhaps, he suggested, Priolo had learned his
capacity for "intrigue" from Rohan, "'qui était assez versé en ces matières.'"53
* * * * * * *
In looking back over his life, Henri de Rohan says almost nothing about most of
the topics on which Rousseau's Confessions center, but memoirs like his nonetheless hold
an important place in a history of modern selfhood. Their importance does not lie in the
aspects of himself that Rohan explored, but in the relation that he saw between himself
and his society. As he presents it, that relationship is essentially conflictual. In both his
memoirs and his earlier writings, Rohan describes his society as fundamentally
fragmented, lacking order and justice; the virtuous individual has no clear place in it. His
literary efforts thus do little to buttress his authority or social position. On the contrary,
they raise awkward questions about his performance of his social role.
Of course, Rohan believes firmly in the social distinctions of the Old Regime. He
never doubts that nobles should lead, ordinary people follow, and he observes aristocratic
"greatness of soul" in even his enemies. The disorder that he sees around him is ethical
rather than social, but the conclusions he draws from it are not vastly different from those
of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century theorists of social alienation. For Rohan as for his
successors, the individual is on his own, forced to define his own purposes and act on his
own terms. Even divine commandments have limited use in such a world, partly because
its conditions change so dramatically over space and time, partly because the virtuous
cannot avoid the harsh tactics of their enemies. Clearly Rohan did not understand
53 Chéneau: Un agent secret de Mazarin, 1908 (see fn. 47), p. 31.
8/20/2019 Dewald - Self-Depiction Nobles XVIIth France (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dewald-self-depiction-nobles-xviith-france-1 19/19
19
selfhood in modern terms. But he and other aristocratic memoir writers helped create the
space in which that idea of selfhood might develop, by creating a radical division
between the self and the society in which it acted.