Download - Congenital amusia york 2012
![Page 1: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Musical Mind:
Insights from Congenital Amusia
Dr. Vicky Williamson
http://www.gold.ac.uk/music-mind-brain/
http://www.gold.ac.uk/psychology/staff/victoria-williamson/
1
![Page 2: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
• What is amusia? How is it diagnosed?
• Behavioural studies – what is difficult?
• How music overlaps with other cognitive processes
• Neurological studies; structural and functional
• How their abilities and brain structure inform about typical music processing
2
![Page 3: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
We are born ‘musical’• Preference for consonance at
2 days (Deaf parents: Masataka, 2006).
• Notice changes to contour (ups and downs) but not intervals (Trehub et al,1997)
• Respond to phrase structure in Mozart (Krumhansl & Jusczyk, 1990)
• Can distinguish different rhythm deviations at 2 days (Winkler et al. 2008)
3
![Page 4: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Natural musical development
• Newborn – perceive and remember pitch sequences, sensitivity to contour, preference for consonance
• 4-6yrs – Respond to tonal more than atonal music
• 7yrs – Sensitive to the rules of implied harmony
• 10yrs – Understand finer aspects of key structure
• 12yrs – Begin to develop tastes and recognition of definite styles
4
![Page 5: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What is amusia?
• People are born with the ability to internalize the music of their own culture (Hannon & Trehub, 2005)
• Amusia: Lifelong difficulties with music perception (production)
• Not acquired
• Estimated ~4% of the population (Kalmus & Fry, 1980)
• No hearing loss, lack of exposure to music, social or cognitive impairments (Peretz et al., 2002; Ayotte et al., 2002)
5
![Page 6: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
If you were amusic…• You report having the condition for as long as you can
remember
• Typically unaware when music, including your own singing, is off-key
• Only ~50% have difficulties with rhythm
• Difficulty discriminating or recognizing melodies without lyrics
• May dislike musical sounds and even avoid public places and situations where music occurs.
• Significantly less likely to “use” music in everyday life or experience reactions such as chills, relaxation or mood enhancement
(Ayotte et al, 2002; Peretz et al, 2003; McDonald & Stewart, 2008Ayotte et al, 2002; Peretz et al, 2003; McDonald & Stewart, 2008)
6
![Page 7: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
AMUSICS
CONTROLS
Agree Unsure Disagree Agree Unsure Disagree
Memories 86% 10% 5% 100% 0% 0%
Shivers 43% 14% 43% 91% 0% 10%
Match mood 57% 14% 29% 100% 0% 0%
Catharsis 38% 14% 48% 100% 0% 0%
Relax 52% 0% 48% 100% 0% 0%
Uplift 33% 5% 62% 100% 0% 0%
Sadden 48% 10% 43% 95% 0% 5%
Comfort 29% 10% 62% 95% 0% 5%
Motivate 48% 10% 43% 100% 0% 0%
Spiritual 24% 24% 52% 72% 10% 19%
Psychological Functions
McDonald & Stewart, Music Perception (2008)
7
![Page 8: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Some (possible) examples
• Milton Friedman – Nobel prize winning economist
• President Theodore Roosevelt
• Che Guevara
• Florence Foster Jenkins
• King Alfonso XIII of Spain - (Anthem servant)
8
![Page 9: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Why is amusia interesting?
• Sheds light on cognitive, neural and potentially genetic basis of normal musical processing
• Can address questions concerning the extent to which musical capacities are associated with other capacities (language, spatial awareness)
• May shed light on possible origins of other developmental (congenital) disorders such as dyslexia, prosopagnosia and dyscalculia
9
![Page 10: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Diagnosis - MBEAThe Montreal Battery for the Evaluation of Amusia
Hear 2 melodies and say same or different
Subtests: Scale, Contour, Interval, Rhythm, Meter (Memory)
10
![Page 11: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1) Pitch Perception Deficits
• What is the smallest difference in pitch that can be detected? (Pitch Change)
• What is the smallest difference in pitch that can be discriminated? *
(Pitch Direction)
What type of test to use?
11
![Page 12: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Stimulus
Pitch Identification
‘Report up or down’
Pitch Production
‘Imitate the pitch change’
Gliding tone
Segmented tones
Based on Loui et al. (2008)
Testing pitch direction
0
12
![Page 13: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Problem: Really excessive thresholds!
13
![Page 14: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
An alternative – AXB tasks
Pitch Detection
Pitch Direction
The advantage of this task is that it is ''criterion free'' (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005)
14
![Page 15: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
AXB thresholds
Williamson et al. 2012Neuropsychologia
15
![Page 16: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conclusions: Pitch Perception
• Many amusics can detect pitch changes but have problems discriminating direction
• Right Heschl’s gyrus lesions (Johnsrude et al. 2000),
bilateral lesions of AC (Tramo et al. 2002), and ‘direction poor’ listeners (Mathias, Micheyl & Bailey, 2010)
• Affects the small changes which are often used in (western) music (e.g. semitones)
• Amusic thresholds are sensitive to task demands
16
![Page 17: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
2) Pitch memory problemsWilliamson & Stewart (2010) – Memory
N = 28 (14 amusics)
• Tone span (how many tones can you remember?)
• Digit span (similar test)
• Both tasks use a list probe recognition paradigm, and a 2up 1down adaptive tracking staircase procedure.
• Working memory span (Operation span – Professor Randall Engle)
17
![Page 18: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Amusic’s tracks
Digits Tones
Span = Average of last 6 reversalsSpan = Average of last 6 reversals
18
![Page 19: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Findings
• Amusics have lower spans for tones but not digits
19
![Page 20: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Conclusions: Memory
• Significantly reduced tone span but comparable digit span
No general short-term memory problem
• Influence of pitch perception (direction) problems only arguable in two extreme cases.
• Supporting evidence: Inability to maintain pitch sounds in memory (Williamson et al. 2010, Advances in Cognitive Psychology)
• Around 20% may have reduced working memory = poorer attention?
20
![Page 21: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
3) Speech problems?
• Pitch is important to audible speech• Especially if we are apart.
1) Tone languages (65%)2) Intonation: Question to statement, convey
attitude.3) Speaker Identity
• Do amusics have trouble hearing speech?
21
![Page 22: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Liu et al.(2010) Brain
Statement-question discrimination with SUBTLE pitch changes:
1. Natural speech 2. Gliding tones 3. Nonsense speech
22
![Page 23: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Natural speech Gliding tones Nonsense speech
* * *
amusic control
Most amusics have difficulties with all 3 tasks
amusic control amusic control
23
![Page 24: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Conclusions: Speech
• Difficulty with subtle speech prosody
• No difficulty with ‘natural’ sentence stimuli (Patel et al. 2008)
• Not a huge problem in real life:
1)Large pitch leaps (5-12 semitones)2)Semantic and sentence context
• But important processing overlap
24
![Page 25: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
4) A spatial problem?
• Pitch has a spatial association
•“Lower” or “Higher”• The musical stave
•SMARC effect (Rusconi et al., 2006)
•Musicians better on spatial tasks (Brochard et al., 2004)
•Amusia as a failure to implement a spatial representation of pitch?
25
![Page 26: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Supportive evidence
NB. No overall difference in reaction times
26
![Page 27: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Visuo-spatial tasks Williamson, Cocchini & Stewart (2011) – Brain and Cognition
• MBEA
• Pitch detection and direction discrimination thresholds
• Mental Rotation – Shepard & Metzler
figures
• Visual Patterns Test (VPT)
– visual memory
• Corsi Blocks – spatial sequence
memory
27
![Page 28: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Results
28
![Page 29: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Conclusions: Wider cognition
• Amusia is associated with wider pattern of difficulties than just pitch perception...but...
• All difficulties have a pitch basis
• Spatial difficulties in amusia have not been replicated in two published studies
• Unique view of processes that underlie music cognition
29
![Page 30: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Neurological underpinnings
• No difference in structure of PAC
• Hyde et al. (2006) measured white matter density between the right frontal and temporal lobes.
• Amusics white matter was thinner, suggests a weaker connection.
• Severity of Amusia = Thinner white matter.
30
![Page 31: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Diffusion tensor tractography studies
• Loui et al. (2009) – Arcuate fasciculus (AF).
• “Disconnection” in the temporal-frontal pathway
• Abnormal migration of proteins along tract
• Underdev of higher order musical processing
31
![Page 32: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
In 9/10 Amusics the right superior AF (red) was unidentifiable
32
![Page 33: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
EEG study of melodic expectancy (Omigie, Pearce, Williamson & Stewart, in revision)
• Task: Detection of expected or unexpected notes in a melody (Pearce and Wiggins, 2006; Pearce et al. 2010) using an implicit (timbre) and explicit task
• Previous finding: Amusics were comparable in the implicit task but significantly worse at explicit recognition of unexpected notes
• Present study: EEG while listening to real melodies . ERPs associated with the recognition of an unexpected musical event (ERAN/N1; 150ms)
• Hypothesis: Amusics will show attenuated responses
• N = 30 (15 amusics): 58 hymns in electronic piano (32 or 64 notes long), all but first 2-4 notes divided into 3 ‘bins’ of low, medium and high expectancy
• Listen to the melodies and detect any deviation in timbre
33
![Page 34: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Results• Less expected notes =
ERAN/N1 in controls that was diminished in amusics
• Amusics have internalised the regularities of music but have less robust representation
• Supported by studies of musicians (Koelsch et al. 1999; 2007)
• Early pre-attentive mechanisms increase probability that change will be consciously perceived (Teemu Rinne et al. 2006)
Scalp maps showing voltage and illustrating the negativity in the N1 time window for low, medium and high expected notes, and the difference in voltage between the low and high IC conditions.
Amusics
Controls
34
![Page 35: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Conclusions• Congenital Amusia is a neurodevelopment disorder that impacts on
music listening (and production)
• Pitch perception problems; discriminating pitch direction
• Pitch memory weaknesses
• Carry over into subtle speech difficulties
• But no spatial difficulties
• Most likely brain origin is a breakdown in pathways that carry pitch-based information to higher centres (role in other ND disorders)
• Diminished explicit awareness of change alongside intact implicit knowledge – links back to task sensitivity issues in pitch perception
• Insight into the organisation of musical mind.
35
![Page 36: Congenital amusia york 2012](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070303/5494054aac7959042e8b4aa1/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Thanks for listening
36