Download - Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
1/15
Business Models of Innovation
Closed Innovation and Open
Innovation (Topic 7 (c))
Belgrade, June 21 and 22, 2011
NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION PROMOTION AND
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
2/15
What is Open Innovation?
Open innovation is a paradigm thatassumes that firms can and shoulduse external ideas as well as internalideas, and internal and external pathsto market, as the firms look to advancetheir technology.
Henry Chesbrough
Image - Henry Chesbroughpresentation on the OECD Conferenceon New Business Strategies for R&D
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
3/15
What is the Difference - Practical Approach
Rules of the sandpit
The toys must be sharedYou cant have it all your way
You must behave yourself
Closed Innovation Open Innovation
Benefits of the sandpit
You dont have to pay for all the toys
You can use the toys others dont want
You can negotiate to play with other toys
You can play alone or together
Source: Alexander Damvelt, Philips3
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
4/15
Models of Innovation and Intellectual
Property (IP)Closed Innovation
Exclusive use of internal R&D
Technology invented, protected, developed,
brought to the market and distributed by thesame company
Full internal control of the innovation fromR to D to C
Technology exploited only through internalbusiness model
IP generators of new technologies mainly
companiesIP barrier to entry not source of revenue
Huge IP non-performing portfolios
Companies usually selling but not buyingIPRs (advantage no confusion about IPownership)
IP valuation method Discounted Cash
Flow Net Present Value of thetechnology
Lack of IP market .
Open innovation
Use of internal and external R&D and inventions corresponding to the particular business models
Openness to external business models
Variety of IP generators and collaborators othercompanies, public universities and R&D institutions,users, customers, suppliers
Active IP asset management of the companies IPportfolio matching technologies with innovative(inside or external) business models to add value toIP
More proactive assertion of IP policy
Development of Intermediate IP Markets
semiconductors, biotechnology, chemicals andconsumer products and Innovation Intermediaries(facilitators)
Use of more complex IP valuation methods suchas Real Option imposed by very intensive anddiversified IP commercialization models reassignment of the IP to different partners duringits legal life, selling/buying, licensing (to companiesor start ups)
IP - an asset which can (and should) be managedthrough an adequate business model in order toincrease value and become a reliable source ofrevenue.
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
5/15
Intellectual Property and
Open InnovationHow Intellectual Property influences Open InnovationStrategic IP asset management is the essence of the Open Innovation Business Model
Protection of inventions and other creations of the human mind and IP ownership are thenecessary preconditions for technology transfer and IP commercialization (we can manage onlythose assets which are owned by us or those to which we have the consent/license of the IPowner to use them).
Transfer of technology in business transactions is transfer of knowledge and IP rights registered (patents, trademarks, industrial design, copyright) and unregistered ( know-how, tradesecret).
One of the biggest advantages of the Open Innovation business model is access to the know-how of the other party.
The intangible nature of IP and the ability to be the subject-matter of business relations with manypartners, often at the same time, corresponds to the basic idea of Open Innovation the ultimateuse of inventions as solutions for multiple needs, incentives for innovation, maximum creationand extraction of the value of the IP asset through the application of different business model.
The potentially most frequent source of collaboration conflicts in Open Innovation lies inundefined IP ownership relations Who is going to own the IP in the jointly-developedtechnology? Joint ownership who and under what conditions is going to use the joint IP(different legislations impose different legal conditions with or without consent of the otherparty)? It is necessary to clarify this at the beginning of the collaboration.
Open Innovation collaboration without territorial limits in conflict with the territorial nature of theIPR (valid only in countries where protection is granted).
Dispute resolution in the Open Innovation multiple collaborations particularly complex becauseof the IP involved Who is the owner of the final product developed through multiplecollaborations? The potential risk of infringement is high. Litigation what would be theapplicable jurisdiction? Particular problem lack of efficient enforcement systems in manycountries, scarcity of IP skilled judges, etc. Professional Mediation and Arbitration can be a wayout.
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
6/15
Intellectual Property and Open Innovation
How Open Innovation Influences IP
More dynamic and interactive use
of IP companies are not onlyselling but also buyingtechnologies
New ways of building upcompanies IP portfolio throughbuying patents (Nortel, Alcatel)
Creation of Intermediary IPMarkets in different sectors(graphics on the right Intermediary market in the IThardware industry source Henry
Chesbrough Open BusinessModel How to Thrive in the NewInnovation Landscape.
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
7/15
Intellectual Property and Open Innovation
Innovation Intermediaries forsearching and evaluating newtechnologies
The field of use of thetechnology is increasing
Increases total value of thetechnology incentive forinnovation
Innovation more productive more users
Benefit for society moresolutions for different needs,
job creation, diminishing ofbrain drain effect..
New and More Efficient FinancialInstruments for fundingbusinesses based on technologies(IP) VC funds, loans based onIP as collateral necessaryprecondition for fostering localcreation and innovation
Introduction of new actors intoinnovation processes companies, universities, R&D,users, suppliers even
governments and regionalorganizations (EU) are taking amore active role in order to createa supportive environment for thecreation and transfer of technology
Open innovation permits new
global partnerships with actorssuch as universities, R&D andstart-ups from developing andcountries in transition, whichencourages the local creation of IPin these countries
IP is recognized and used as avaluable source of revenue andnot only as a mean of exclusion.
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
8/15
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
9/15
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
10/15
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
11/15
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
12/15
Intellectual Property and Open Innovation: New Partners from Emerging,
Developing and Countries in Transition
Emerging, developing and countries intransition do have significant researchresults and know how to develop efficienttechnologies in the specific areas of theircompetitive advantage.
Major IP Generators - universities andR&D institutions.
Small percentage of businesses have theirown R&D only in particular areas of astate economy such as the oil industry inBrazil (Petrobrais) or Malaysia(Petronas) have their own R&D.
Small and medium size enterprises (SMEs), which represent a great majority ofbusinesses rarely base their businessmodels on innovation developed inside oroutside of the SME.
In most of the cases there is little or nocollaboration between the public and theprivate sector in the domain of technology
transfer.Businesses either do not have confidencein locally developed IP solutions or do nothave the ability to absorb newtechnologies.
What is Lacking ?
Necessary Basic Preconditions forEfficient Technology Transfer System
Adequate Legal Framework(national and institutional
level)Organizational Infrastructure(technology managementorganizations and units)
Funding (government andventure capital)
Skilled professionals
(scientists, technologymanagers, IP professionals,etc.)
Education to providesustainable flow of skilledpeople
Supportive IP System
There is a lack a market economyexperience and a developed privatebusiness community.
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
13/15
Intellectual Property and Open Innovation: Potential
Benefits for Partners from Emerging, Developing andCountries in Transition
New openings for technologydevelopment and IPcommercialization throughinnovative business models of , inparticular for universities and R&D
institutions (local businesses arenot interested or do not have thecapacity)
Great learning opportunity fromthe technology and businessmanagement point of view
Development of the necessarymarket experience with moreexperienced partners.
Solution to one of the greatest
challenges how to find an
adequate market and partners
intermediaries can help them
Potential entry to new markets
Access to Venture Capital
instruments and managementservices that VC offers .
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
14/15
Intellectual Property and Open Innovation: Potential
Challenges for Partners from Developing Countries
Lack of IP asset management knowledgeand practice, a market economy culture andskilled professionals necessary for
complex transactions.Scarcity of an adequate legal framework andguidelines how to negotiate - no clearinstitutional policies and strategies setting upa framework for technology managementnegotiations.
Consequently, they can be potential victimsof more experienced intermediaries orpartners, in particular regarding thevaluation of their technologies, IP ownershipissues and disclosure of confidentialinformation
Lack of compatibility with standards andplatforms in certain areas IT
Existing perceptions about the quality ofR&D results created and technologiesdeveloped in developing and countries intransition.
Protection of their IP ownership interestsand rights in the case of the use ofunregistered IP know-how and in the
multiple collaboration agreements background IP and grant backs of futureimprovements of the technology, areimportant issues for R&D institutions
Imposition of already defined and writtencontracts
Lack of access to more sophisticated data
bases can make them a target of trolls, evenon the basis of false claims
Imposition of dispute resolution mechanismsand jurisdictions some countries are well-know for very costly litigations and differentIP jurisdiction rules which may have adecisive influence on the decision toenforce or not or to place un informed party
in a very difficult legal and financial situation.
-
8/12/2019 Closed Innovation and Open Innovation
15/15
Thank you [email protected]