1
1
1
Clean Agent Fire Protection Clean Agent Fire Protection with Hydrofluorocarbonswith Hydrofluorocarbons
Mark L. Robin, Kenneth V. Blanchard and Souvik GhoshDuPont Fluoroproducts
Presented at:
Fire India 2009Mumbai, India
September 7, 2009
2
2
2
Halogenated Compounds as Fire Suppression Agents
Early 1900sCCl4 extinguishers introduced
Late 1920s : Methyl Bromide (CH3Br)More effective than CCl4British – aircraft applicationsWWII - German military aircraft, marine
Late 1930s: Bromochloromethane (CH2BrCl)German LuftwaffeUS Air Force in late 1940s
3
3
3
Halogenated Compounds as Fire Suppression Agents
Late 1940sUS Army sought agent as effective as
CH3Br or CH2BrCl, but with lower toxicityOver 60 agents evaluatedFour selected for further study
Halon 1301 CF3Br Halon 1211 CF2BrClHalon 1202 CF2Br2Halon 2402 BrCF2CF2Br
4
4
4
The Halon Era: 1960s to 1994Halon 1301: CF3Br
Total flooding applications
Halon 1211: CF2BrClPortable, local applications
“Clean Agents”No corrosive or abrasive residues left
following extinguishment
Water, foam, powder – secondary damage due to agent can exceed damage due to fire
8
8
8
Halon 1301/Halon 1211: “Clean Agents”
Clean Agents
No corrosive or abrasive residuesNo damage to sensitive/expensive assets
No cleanup required after dischargeNo business interruption
Source: Alinenan ROI Report, January 2004.
9
9
9
Downtime Impact for Various Downtime Impact for Various Business ApplicationsBusiness Applications
Business Application Estimated Outage Cost per Minute, US$
Supply Chain Management $11,000
Electronic Commerce $10,000
Customer Service Center $3,700
ATM $3,500
Financial Management $1,500
Messaging $1,000
Infrastructure $700Source: Alinenan ROI Report, January 2004.
10
10
10
The Halon Era: 1960s to 1994What made the Halons “Ideal Fire
Extinguishing Agents” ???CleanEfficient fire suppressionChemically inert• Storage stable• Non-reactive chemically
Electrically non-conductingLow ToxicityLow Cost
A unique combination of properties
11
11
11
The Halon Era: 1960s to 1994Halon 1301/Halon 1211 Applications
Electronics facilitiesComputer roomsCommunications equipment roomsOil & gas industry
● pipeline pumping stations● offshore platforms
Shipboard machinery spacesMuseumsLibraries
13
13
13
Properties of the Ideal Halon ReplacementProperties of the Ideal Halon Replacement• Clean • Efficient fire suppression• Chemically inert
Long term storage stabilityNo chemical reactions with water, fuels, assets
• Electrically non-conducting• Low toxicity• Zero ODP• Zero GWP• Reasonable manufacturing cost
No replacement has been found which satisfies ALL of the above requirements
14
14
14
Halon 1301 ReplacementsHalon 1301 Replacements• Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
HFC-227ea: FM-200® CF3CHFCF3HFC-125: FE-25TM CF3CF2HHFC-23: FE-13TM CF3H
• Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)HCFC Blend A: NAF-S-III
• HCFC-22/HCFC-123/HCFC-124/d-limonene• Inert Gases
IG-541: InergenTM Ar/N2/CO2IG-55: ArgoniteTM Ar/N2
• Perfluorinated KetonesFK-5-1-12: NovecTM 1230 CF3CF2CCF(CF3)2
O
HCFCs Subject to Phaseout
15
15
15
Halogenated Agents: Extinguishing Mechanism
• Primarily via physical mechanism of heat removal
Reduces flame temperature below that required to maintain combustion
Efficient mechanism – extinguishing concentrations typically 4 to 12% v/v
16
16
16
Inert Gas Agents: Extinguishing Mechanism
• Flame extinguishment via O2 dilution
Slows combustion reaction rate to point where reaction can no longer sustain itself
Inefficient mechanism- extinguishing concentrations typically 40 to 70% v/v
17
17
17
AGENT PERFORMANCE: Inert Gases & HFCsAGENT PERFORMANCE: Inert Gases & HFCsAgent Quantity for Protection of 100 m3 Volume
Class A Hazard Class B Hazard a
Agent Agent required,
% v/v
Agent required,
kg
Agent required,
% v/v
7.0 54.8
72.440.0
8.7
43.9
Agent required,
kg
HFC-227ea 69.4
IG-541 81.9
a Heptane
18
18
18
Comparison of Inert Gas and Comparison of Inert Gas and Halogenated SystemsHalogenated Systems
Inert Gas Agents• Cannot be compressed to
liquid – stored as high pressure gas
• Require high pressure cylinders, piping
• Require large number of cylinders – large footprint
• Cost increases more rapidly with increasing system size
Halogenated Agents• Stored as liquid• Large mass of agent can
be stored in small volume• Standard cylinders,
piping• Small number of
cylinders required – small footprint
19
19
19
Halocarbon vs Inert Gas System: Halocarbon vs Inert Gas System: 1000 m1000 m33 Enclosure, Class A HazardEnclosure, Class A Hazard
Agent Design Conc., %
v/v
Agent, kg
7.0 548
72440.0
No. Cylinders
HFC-227ea 2
IG-541 (300 bar) 22
HFCHFC--227ea227ea
IG-541
20
20
20
Agent Efficiency: Requirements for Total Flooding Agents
Low boiling point• Desire gaseous agent to completely and rapidly flood
the protected enclosure, including obstructed areas• Allows for larger area coverage, higher maximum ceiling height,
lower storage and operation temperatures • Example: Halon 1301 vs Halon 1211 – Halon 1301 better suited
as total flooding agent
Low mass of agent required for extinguishment• Agent pricing is on a weight basis (kg), not volume
Low vapor density of air/agent mixture• Lower vapor density = longer hold times
Low system cost
21
21
21
Halon 1301 Replacements:Halon 1301 Replacements:Chemical/Physical PropertiesChemical/Physical Properties
Halon 1301 HFCs Inert Gases F-Ketones
Physical State a Gas Gas
HFC-227ea -16 oCHFC-125 - 48 oCHFC-23 - 82 oC
Very Low
Gas Liquid
Boiling point - 58 oC IG-541 - 196 oCIG-55 -190 oC
NovecTM
1230:47 oC
Chemical Reactivity Very Low Very Low High
a At room temperature (25 oC)
22
22
22
Agent EfficiencyProperty FM-200® NovecTM 1230 a
Boiling Point -16 oC 47 oC
Kg to protect 1000 m3, Class A 548 610
Maximum Area Coverage
239 m2
(2576 ft2)95 m2
(1024 ft2)
Maximum Ceiling Height
4.9 m(16 ft)
4.3 m(14 ft)
Container Storage Temperature b
0 to 54 oC(32 to 130 oF)
16 to 27 oC(60 to 80 oF)
Vapor Density of Agent/Air Mixture
1.75 kg/m3
(0.109 lb/ft3)1.94 kg/m3
(0.121 lb/ft3)a Sapphire Design Manual, Ansulb Engineered system protecting multiple hazards
23
23
23
Halon Replacements: Halon Replacements: Chemical/Physical PropertiesChemical/Physical Properties
Fundamental Differences• Physical State
Halons/HCFCs/HFCs/Inert Gases: Gases at room temperatureC6 Perfluoroketone: Liquid at room temperature
• Chemical ReactivityHalons/HCFCs/HFCs/Inert Gases: Chemically unreactivePerfluoroketones: Chemically reactive – water, alcohols
24
24
24
Halon Replacements and Halon Replacements and Chemical ReactivityChemical Reactivity
Low Chemical Reactivity Required –Chemical Reactivity Impacts:
Performance/LeakageHandling Human ExposureCleanlinessEnvironmental Impact
25
25
25
Potential Consequences of Potential Consequences of Chemical ReactivityChemical Reactivity
System Performance CompromisedSystem Performance CompromisedAgent reacted is not available for suppression
“Contact with water or solvents either polar or hydrocarbon could render Novec 1230 fluid ineffective” a
Systems in place 10-20 years● Systems must remain leak-free throughout this period● Chemical reactions producing even small amounts of
corrosive products could lead to corrosion and eventual leakage of agent, compromising the effectiveness and safety of the system
aSapphire Installation Manual, 5/15/2003
26
26
26
Potential Consequences of Potential Consequences of Chemical ReactivityChemical Reactivity
•• Special Handling ProceduresSpecial Handling Procedures• Example: vent driers, nitrogen purges required to
prevent contact of NovecTM 1230 with moist air a
•• Human Exposure ImplicationsHuman Exposure Implications• NovecTM 1230 hydrolyzed when crossing lung-air
interface to produce HFC-227ea and F-propionic acid b
a 3M: Sapphire Installation Manual, 5/15/2003b 3M Technical Brief, Novec 1230 Fire Protection Fluid Safety Assessment, 2004
27
27
27
Potential Consequences of Potential Consequences of Chemical ReactivityChemical Reactivity
•• Atmospheric Impact ImplicationsAtmospheric Impact Implications• Example: Atmospheric hydrolysis of NovecTM 1230
not considered in evaluation of GWP • The extent of atmospheric hydrolysis, e.g., on
atmospheric aerosols, could render GWP of perfluoroketones similar to that of HFCs
•• Cleanliness ImplicationsCleanliness Implications• Detrimental chemical reaction with enclosure,
enclosure contents
29
29
29
Toxicological Profile of HFCsToxicological Profile of HFCs
• Hydrofluorocarbons • Toxicology well-characterized for a large number of HFCs• More toxicological studies have been performed on FM-200®
than any other clean agent • FM-200® approved for use in metered-dose inhalers• FM-200® not metabolized
30
30
30
Environmental RegulationsEnvironmental Regulations• Montreal Protocol
• Related to ozone depleting substancesHFCs all zero ODP, so not subject to Montreal Protocol
• Kyoto ProtocolRelated to greenhouse gases (GHGs)HFCs are one type of GHGKyoto Protocol concerned with emission reductions
• No limits or banning of HFCs in fire suppression applications
• F-Gas RegulationsSimilar to Kyoto ProtocolNo limits or banning of HFCs in fire suppression applications
31
31
31
Impact of Emissions of HFCs from Fire Impact of Emissions of HFCs from Fire Suppression ApplicationsSuppression Applications
• Impact of all HFC emissions < 3% of total impact of all GHG emissions
• Impact of HFC emissions from fire fighting< 1% of total impact of all HFC emissions, hence….
• Impact of HFC emissions from fire fighting < 0.03% of total impact of all GHG emissions
Fire suppression systems regarded as essentially non-emissive
Source: HEEP, US EPA 2009
34
34
34
US EPA Position on HFCsUS EPA Position on HFCs“EPA does not anticipate any change to its acceptability listing of HFCs in fire suppression applications. The availability of Halon substitutes such as HFCs have been key in achieving the significant progress made to date and will continue to be important in eliminating the use of halons in the U.S. and globally.”a
The new U.S. EPA Supercomputing Center employs FM-200® for fire protection
On January 2, 2009, the U.S. EPA announced the approval of several HFC-containing blends as acceptable substitutes under SNAP for HCFC-22 in numerous refrigeration applications b
aEPA letter to Chemtura b Fed. Reg. 74(1), p. 23 (1/2/2009)
36
36
36
Worldwide Clean Agent MarketNumber of Installed Systems
HFCs are the most widely employed Halon 1301 alternatives
HFCs (70%)
Inert Gases (20%)
Other (10%)
37
37
37
Clean Agent Market: Installed SystemsClean Agent Market: Installed Systems
90.0%
7.0%3.0%
90.0%
9.0%1.0%
FM-200
HFC-125 7%
HFC-227ea 90%
Other 3%
IG-541 90%
IG-55 9%
Other 1%
HFCs Inert Gases
38
38
38
HFC Clean Agents: Global Acceptability
• HFC-227ea (FM-200®) is the most widely employed Halon 1301 alternative worldwide
• > 300,000 systems installed• Internationally accepted standards • Approved by numerous international bodies
• SNAP (U.S. EPA)• Underwriters Laboratories • Factory Mutual• NFPA, ISO, numerous national standards• U.S. Department of Defense• IMO, US Coast Guard• U.S. FAA• LPC, VdS
39
39
39
HFC Clean Agent Installations: Global Acceptability
• Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Australia• Bahrain, Bermuda, Belgium, Brazil• Canada, Chile, Colombia, Congo, Czech Republic, China• Dominican Republic• Egypt• France• Gabon, Germany, Greece, Guam, Gibraltar• Hong Kong, Hungary• India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Italy, Israel• Jamaica, Japan, Jordan• Kuwait• Lebanon• Malaysia, Mexico• Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, North Korea
40
40
40
HFC Clean Agent Installations: Global Acceptability
• Panama, Pakistan, Peru, Poland, Philippines, Portugal, Puerto Rico
• Qatar• Romania, Russia• Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovokia, S. Africa, S. Korea,
Spain, Sweden• Taiwan, Thailand, Trinidad, Tobago, Turkey• Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, UK, USA, Uruguay• Venezuela
• Over a decade of experience with HFC clean agent systems has demonstrated their safety and performance
41
41
41
HFC Clean Agents: Applications• Telecommunications facilities• Computer rooms/Data centers• Museums, Libraries• Hospitals, Medical Facilities/Equipment• Clean rooms• Engine compartments/nacelles• Petrochemical facilities• Grain elevators• Oil rig platforms• Floating roof tanks• Aircraft• Motorsports
42
42
42
FM-200® Applications:Museums and Cultural Landmarks• American Museum of Natural History• Smithsonian Institute – Star Spangled Banner• Library of Congress – 1st draft of Declaration of
Independence• Eiffel Tower• Alexandria Library, Egypt• National Museum of Prehistory, Taiwan• Field Museum, Chicago• Aristoteles University Rare Book Collection, Greece• Royal Thai Family Silk Museum, Thailand
43
43
43
FM-200® Applications:Airports and Satellite Installations
• North American DEW Line Radar Installation• Dusseldorf Int’l Airport• Madrid Int’l Airport• Charles DeGaulle Airport• Newark Int’l Airport• San Francisco Int’l Airport• New Bangkok Int’l Airport• Dubai Int’l Airport
44
44
44
FM-200® Applications:Data/Control Centers
• U.S. EPA Supercomputing Center• Caesar’s Palace, Las Vegas• Harrah’s Casino• MGM Casino, Las Vegas• Cox Communications
45
45
45
HFC Clean Agents: Applications Military Aircraft, Ships, Vehicles
• Engine Nacelles – US DOD• FE-25TM (HFC-125) accepted as the best replacement for
Halon 1301 in engine nacelle protectionF/A-18 E/F, V-22, H-60 helicopter, UH-1Y, AH-1Z and
F22 aircraft
• FM-200® (HFC-227ea)• MLRS and M2/M3 Bradley fighting vehicle• LPD-17 amphibious transport ship• CVN-76 aircraft carrier• Stryker crew compartment• Lewis and Clark T-AKE-1 Combat Logistics Force Ship• LCU-2000 series watercraft
46
46
46
Industry Leader Acceptance of Industry Leader Acceptance of HFC Fire Extinguishing AgentsHFC Fire Extinguishing Agents
47
47
47
Industry Partners Offering Industry Partners Offering HFC Fire Extinguishing AgentsHFC Fire Extinguishing Agents
48
48
48
HFCs in Fire Suppression: Conclusion• HFCs are the most widely employed Halon
replacements worldwide• Best combination of effectiveness, cleanliness, low
chemical reactivity, toxicity, environmental impact and cost of Halon replacement agents
• Globally accepted• Mature technology – 17 year history• Excellent safety history• Excellent performance history