Download - Childrens Health Strategy
Health Protection AgencyCentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental HazardsChemical Hazards and Poisons DivisionChiltonDidcotOxfordshire OX11 0RQUnited Kingdom
Tel: +44(0)1235 822895Email: [email protected]
March 2009ISBN 978-0-85951-638-9© Health Protection AgencyPrinted on chlorine-free paper
A Children’s Environment and Health Strategy for the UK
A C
hild
ren’s En
viron
men
t and
Health
Strategy fo
r the U
K
Acknowledgements
This document has been prepared by the Health Protection Agency at the request of the Department of Health, on behalf of the Interdepartmental Steering Group on Environment and Health. This Steering Group consists of representatives of the following government and devolved administration departments and agencies:
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Department for Communities and Local Government
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Department of Transport
Department of Health (Chair)
Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (Northern Ireland)
Department of the Environment (Northern Ireland) – Environment and Heritage Service
Environment Agency
Food Standards Agency
Health Protection Agency
Scottish Environment Protection Agency
Scottish Government
Welsh Assembly Government
The views expressed in this document do not necessarily represent those of any single government or devolved administration department or agency.
We gratefully acknowledge the involvement of children and young people in providing their views, which have been invaluable. We also gratefully acknowledge the contribution made by all the consultees during the public consultation.
Prepared by Raquel Duarte-Davidson, Alexander Capleton, Stacey Wyke, Rob Orford, Tina Endericks and Gary Coleman
A Children’s Environment and Health Strategy for the UK
This document has been prepared by the Health Protection Agency at the request of the Department of Health, on behalf of the Interdepartmental Steering Group on Environment and Health.
Please direct any queries concerning this report to [email protected]
Copies of the report and supporting documents are available at http://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape
March 2009ISBN 978-0-85951-638-9© Health Protection Agency
�
Foreword 3
ExecutiveSummary 5
� Introduction 6
2 Water,SanitationandHealth �4
3 Accidents,Injuries,ObesityandPhysicalActivity �8
4 RespiratoryHealth,IndoorandOutdoorAirPollution 26
5 Chemical,PhysicalandBiologicalAgents 30
6 YouthParticipation 38
7 OverarchingIssuesandPriorities 42
8 SummaryofRecommendations 46
9 References 50
AppendixA SummaryoftheChildren’sEnvironmentandHealthStrategyRecommendationsfortheUK 54
AppendixB SummaryofPoliciesofRelevancetoChildren’sHealthandWell-being 56
Acknowledgements Insidebackcover
Contents
2
3
I welcome this Children’s Environment and Health Strategy
and the work being taken forward across the World Health
Organization (WHO) European Region to protect the health of
children from environmental hazards. This is vital to improve
the health not only of children, but also of the adults they will
become and future generations.
The WHO Children’s Environment and Health Action Plan covers
a very broad area of environmental hazards, many of which are
already being addressed within the UK. However, we cannot be
complacent. I support the proposed approach of building on
current initiatives, ensuring there is better coordination across
government and tackling locations such as schools and homes.
The identification of examples of good practice in the Strategy
and the sharing of these examples across the UK should help
make changes more effective and coherent.
This approach of linking the environment to the health of
children will help drive forward change and this Strategy
identifies some important areas where this is required. These
include some longstanding concerns such as hygiene in
schools, injuries and health inequalities and also areas which
are becoming increasingly important such as obesity, skin
cancers and the long-term chronic effects of chemicals and
pollutants in our environment. This forward-looking approach
will also help ensure that new concerns such as climate change
are addressed.
The delivery of this Strategy will involve close partnership
working between many public bodies, the government and
devolved administrations. The Health Protection Agency
is looking forward to playing its part in helping to deliver
this initiative.
The involvement of young people in the Strategy and the
careful consideration of their views has been an important and
welcome feature of its development.
Justin McCrackenChief Executive
Health Protection Agency
Foreword
4
5
The ‘environment and health process’, led by the World Health
Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe, aims to support
the 53 member states of the WHO European Region as they
plan and implement national and international environment
and health policies. At the fourth WHO conference on
environment and health in 2004, ministers from the countries
across the WHO European Region, including the UK, agreed
to the development of the Children’s Environment and Health
Action Plan for Europe (CEHAPE). This plan commits countries
to the development of national Children’s Environment and
Health Action Plans to protect the health of children and young
people from environmental hazards. CEHAPE consists of four
Regional Priority Goals covering: water, sanitation and health;
accidents, injuries, obesity and physical activity; respiratory
health, indoor and outdoor air pollution; and chemical, physical
and biological hazards.
To meet the UK commitments to CEHAPE this Children’s
Environment and Health Strategy has been prepared in order
to provide an overview of current activities in the UK, make
recommendations on the measures necessary to improve
children’s and young people’s health by improving their
environment, and to encourage a coherent cross-government
approach to these issues.
Executive Summary
The UK, through a wide range of initiatives and policies,
has addressed many of the key concerns under CEHAPE.
As a consequence the UK is in a good position relative to
other European countries, having controlled many of the
environmental influences on children’s and young people’s
health included in CEHAPE. The Strategy aims to build on and
complement policies and activities already undertaken by
government departments, devolved administrations, local
and regional authorities and the National Health Service and,
as such, many of the recommendations are in the process
of being taken forward. In this way it will help encourage
a comprehensive, strategic approach to protecting and
improving children’s and young people’s health and well-being.
The challenge for the UK now is that, whilst the legislative
foundation on public health has been well developed and the
baseline in most Regional Priority Goals is very good, there are
areas that could still benefit from improvement. Addressing
these should be an important component for improving
children’s and young people’s health in the future. The specific
areas recommended for improvement are highlighted within
this Strategy.
This report will be submitted to the Department of Health and
the Interdepartmental Steering Group on Environment and
Health for their consideration.
6
1.1 Background
Children can be particularly susceptible to harm from
environmental hazards. This is because their bodies are still
developing and they may have relatively higher exposures
to environmental hazards than adults. There are still many
unknown factors, especially about cumulative effects and long-
term impacts of environmental hazards.
In order to help address this, in 2004 the World Health
Organization (WHO) European Region developed an action
plan to tackle major environmental risks to children’s health:
the Children’s Environment and Health Action Plan for Europe
(CEHAPE). This plan commits member countries to develop
national Children’s Environment and Health Action Plans to
reduce the burden of disease in children caused by major
environmental risk factors. The UK supported the development
of CEHAPE and committed to developing a child-focused
environment and health strategy for the UK.
The Children’s Environment and Health Action Plan for Europe
consists of four Regional Priority Goals, focusing on the main
causes of the environment-related burden of disease across
the 53 member states of the WHO European Region. These
are: water, sanitation and health; accidents, injuries, obesity
and physical activity; respiratory health, indoor and outdoor
air pollution; and chemical, physical and biological hazards
(Box 1.1).
Within the UK, CEHAPE is being taken forward through the
development of the Children’s Environment and Health
Strategy, which draws on many published reports and papers.
Amongst these is the report Health Protection in the 21st Century: Understanding the Burden of Disease: preparing for the future (HPA, 2005), which included a review of current
environment and health issues relevant to children. A number
of in-depth reviews were undertaken to provide a snapshot
of the situation in 2006/07 (Capleton and Duarte-Davidson,
2007; O’Connell and Duarte Davidson, 2007; Wyke et al,
2007; Capleton et al, 2008); these have been summarised in
a separate report: Children’s Environment and Health Action Plan: A Summary of Current Activities which Address Children’s Environment and Health Issues within the UK (HPA, 2007a). The
summary report provides background information and analysis
for the issues discussed here.
1 Introduction
Box�.� Children’sEnvironmentandHealth
ActionPlanforEuropeRegional
PriorityGoals
Regional Priority Goal I
To prevent and significantly reduce the morbidity
andmortalityarisingfromgastrointestinaldisorders
andotherhealtheffects,byensuringthatadequate
measuresaretakentoimproveaccesstosafeand
affordablewaterandadequatesanitationfor
allchildren.
Regional Priority Goal II
Topreventandsubstantiallyreducehealth
consequencesfromaccidentsandinjuriesand
pursueadecreaseinmorbidityfromlackof
adequatephysicalactivity,bypromotingsafe,secure
andsupportivehumansettlementsforallchildren.
Regional Priority Goal III
Topreventandreducerespiratorydiseasedue
tooutdoorandindoorairpollution,thereby
contributingtoareductioninthefrequencyof
asthmaticattacks,inordertoensurethatchildren
canliveinanenvironmentwithcleanair.
Regional Priority Goal IV
Toreducetheriskofdiseaseanddisabilityarising
fromexposuretohazardouschemicals(suchas
heavymetals),physicalagents(e.g.excessivenoise)
andbiologicalagentsandtohazardousworking
environmentsduringpregnancy,childhoodand
adolescence.
(WHO, 2004)
7
The development of the Children’s Environment and
Health Strategy was overseen by a cross-government
Interdepartmental Steering Group on Environment and Health,
chaired by the Department of Health, with representatives
from relevant UK government departments, agencies and
the devolved administrations (Box 1.2). The Health Protection
Agency (HPA) was commissioned by the Department of Health,
on behalf of the Interdepartmental Steering Group, to develop
the Children’s Environment and Health Strategy for the UK.
1.2 Scope and aims
The Children’s Environment and Health Strategy makes
recommendations on the measures necessary to ensure the
UK meets its commitments under CEHAPE, and helps provide a
coherent cross-government approach to improving children’s
and young people’s health by improving their environment.
Box 1.3 shows the definitions of environment and health and
children and young people as used in this Strategy.
The UK is in a relatively good position regarding environment
and health as it has long recognised the importance of, and
the health benefits to be gained from, a clean and healthy
environment. Over the past 150 years many initiatives have
led to a significant reduction in mortality and morbidity
through improving water and sanitation, air quality, nutrition,
housing quality, controlling exposures to chemical, physical
and biological hazards, and conducting research to further
our understanding of the links between the environment
Box�.2 Membershipofthe
InterdepartmentalSteeringGroup
onEnvironmentandHealth
DepartmentforBusiness,EnterpriseandRegulatory
Reform
DepartmentforChildren,SchoolsandFamilies
DepartmentforCommunitiesandLocalGovernment
DepartmentforEnvironment,FoodandRuralAffairs
DepartmentforTransport
DepartmentofHealth(Chair)
DepartmentofHealth,SocialServicesandPublic
Safety(NorthernIreland)
DepartmentoftheEnvironment(NorthernIreland)
–EnvironmentandHeritageService
EnvironmentAgency
FoodStandardsAgency
HealthProtectionAgency
ScottishGovernment
ScottishEnvironmentProtectionAgency
WelshAssemblyGovernment
Box 1.3 Definitions – environment and
healthandchildrenandyoung
people
Environment and healthincludesboththedirect
andindirecteffectsofchemical,physical(including
ionisingandnon-ionisingradiation,andnoise)and
biologicalhazardsonhealthandwell-being,and
encompassessomeaspectsofthephysicalandsocial
environment that influence health and well-being,
suchashousing,urbandevelopment,landuse
andtransport.
ForthedevelopmentoftheChildren’sEnvironment
andHealthStrategy,achild and young person isa
personunder�9yearsofage,whichincludesthe
foetus.Thereproductivecapacityofadultsandthe
healthofthebreastfeedingmotherarealsotaken
intoaccountwherethismayaffectthehealthofthe
childoryoungperson.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
8
and health. As a result, legislation, administrative systems
and policies are in place that address substantially many
of the commitments made in CEHAPE. However, although
many of these initiatives have been successful, there still
remain opportunities to bring about further improvements in
children’s health through effectively managing environmental
hazards and environmental influences on children’s health
and well-being.
This Strategy focuses on environmental factors that impact on
children’s health, based on an assessment of current activities
and issues identified across the UK. It aims to work alongside
existing environment and health policies and initiatives whilst
identifying gaps and priority areas that may be taken forward
to increase protection of children’s health from environmental
hazards and encourage the development of environments that
facilitate and promote good health and well-being.
1.3 Why children and young people?
About a quarter of the population of the UK are children; in
2007 there were approximately 14.7 million young people
under 19 years of age living in the UK. Children and young
people can be especially vulnerable to environmental
determinants of disease (WHO, 2005a). For example, children:
• are still growing and developing, which means that
particular biological systems may be more susceptible
to harm from environmental hazards than those
of adults, and immunity to disease is not as well
developed,
• often experience different patterns and levels of
exposure to environmental hazards than adults
because they take in more food, water and air
per kilogram body weight than adults, consume a
different diet (particularly when very young) and can
absorb some chemicals more readily than adults,
• can be more vulnerable to unintentional injuries due
to their tendency for exploratory behaviour, play and
their relative inability to judge risks.
Since the early 1900s substantial improvements in the quality of
the environment in the UK have been made that have resulted
in measurable improvements in children’s health. For example:
• legislation has been enacted to control lead in
drinking water, paint, fuel, toys and from industrial
emissions and, as a result, blood lead levels in children
have declined significantly,
• deaths from unintentional injuries and poisonings
(including carbon monoxide) amongst children have
declined substantially over the past ten years as a
result in improvements in safety,
• international and national legislation to control
persistent organic pollutants has resulted in
measurable declines in the levels of these pollutants
detected in breast milk,
• the UK continues to maintain a high standard of
drinking water quality and many diseases once
associated with poor quality drinking water are
no longer a risk factor and outbreaks of disease
associated with the public water supply are now
infrequent.
Despite these advances, there are areas where children’s and
young people’s health can still be improved and in which
environmental factors play an important role. In particular,
changes in lifestyle and eating habits have resulted in a
decrease in physical activity and a rise in overweight and
obese children, and unintentional injuries continue to be a
leading cause of mortality and morbidity amongst children.
It is important to ensure that their environment promotes
healthy behaviours (e.g. walking and cycling), promotes well-
being (e.g. access to well-managed green spaces) and is not
detrimental to their health (e.g. through exposure to pollution
and unsafe environments). Additionally, the development of
new technologies (e.g. nanotechnology, mobile phones and
WiFi) may pose risks to children’s health that need to be fully
evaluated to ensure any risks are properly managed. As our
understanding of the links between the environment and
children’s health advances, areas where further improvements
could be made may be identified and hence require
further action.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
9
1.4 Burden of disease in children and young people
To help understand the impact of the environment on
children’s health this needs to be considered within the context
of the broader burden of disease amongst children.
1.4.1 Births
Since 2002 the number of births in the UK has increased
steadily from about 670,000 births per year to about 770,000
in 2007 (GROS, 2008; NISRA, 2008b; ONS, 2004, 2008a).
1.4.2 Deaths
Childhood mortality has been decreasing since the beginning
of the 20th century. There are currently about 5200 deaths
per year from birth to 14 years old (GROS, 2008; NISRA, 2008a;
ONS, 2008c). The main causes of death (GROS, 2006; NIRSA,
2006; ONS, 2006a) vary between age groups and are:
• congenital malformations and conditions that
originate during the perinatal period (i.e. from the
24th week of gestation to 1 month after birth) for
children aged 0–12 months,
• congenital malformations, injuries, diseases of the
nervous system and neoplasms* for children aged
1–4 years,
• neoplasms, injuries and diseases of the nervous system
for 5–14 year olds.
1.4.3 Hospital admissions
In England approximately 1.8 million Finished Consultant
Episodes† are attributed to children aged 0–14 years and
account for about 12% of all such episodes. The main reasons
for being admitted into hospital for 0–14 year olds are
conditions that originate during the perinatal period, diseases
of the respiratory system (including asthma), and injuries and
poisonings (Hospital Episode Statistics, 2008).
1.4.4 General Practitioner visits
The main burden of disease falls on General Practitioners (GPs),
with approximately one-third of all GP consultations being
for patients aged 0–14 years (HPA, 2005). Around 50% of
these are attributable to infections: mainly respiratory tract
infections (including the common cold and ear and throat
infections) and intestinal infections. Visits for non-infectious
diseases include nervous system problems, skin diseases,
other respiratory diseases (such as asthma) and injuries and
poisonings (RCGP, 2006).
1.5 Policy context
1.5.1 European Union policy context
In 2003, the European Union (EU) developed a European
Environment and Health Strategy (CEC, 2003) in support of,
and in response to, the WHO Fourth Ministerial Conference
on Environment and Health. The strategy, also known as the
SCALE (Science, Children, Awareness, Legislation and Evaluation)
initiative, currently has a specific focus on children and aims to
reduce the burden of disease caused by environmental factors
in the EU, identify and prevent new health threats caused
by environmental factors and to strengthen EU capacity for
policy making in this area. The Strategy on Environment and
Health led to the European Environment and Health Action
Plan 2004–2010. The action plan has 13 specific actions,
including: developing a coherent approach to biomonitoring;
strengthening environment and health research; ensuring
potential hazards on environment and health are identified and
addressed; and improving indoor air quality. Children’s concerns
are integrated throughout the action plan and implementation
is being shared between member states, stakeholder groups,
the European Commission and international organisations.
Within the UK, the Department for Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs is the lead government department.
* A neoplasm is an abnormal mass of tissue, normally a tumour.† A Finished Consultant Episode is a single treatment episode dealt with by one consultant in the NHS which is independent of the number of days spent in hospital.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
�0
1.5.2 UK policy context
Many of the areas highlighted for action in the CEHAPE Regional
Priority Goals are already being addressed in the UK. Therefore
it is important that the Children’s Environment and Health
Strategy complements, works with and builds on existing
policies and initiatives to ensure children’s environmental health
is comprehensively addressed throughout the UK. Some of the
English and devolved administration policies of relevance to
children’s health and well-being are listed in Box 1.4; a more
detailed list is provided in Appendix B.
It is envisaged that this Children’s Environment and Health
Strategy will work alongside the Children’s Plan (DCSF, 2007)
and Healthy Lives, Brighter Futures (DCSF and DH, 2009)
in England, and other similar initiatives in the devolved
administrations, to encourage a comprehensive, strategic
approach to addressing children’s health issues and ensuring
children enjoy as high a standard of health as possible.
Other key drivers that will influence future priorities in the UK
include climate change, sustainable development, transport,
housing growth and new technologies. In addressing these it is
important that the specific needs of children and young people
are taken into account.
1.6 Consultation process
A draft version of the Children’s Environment and Health
Strategy was available for consultation between 17 March
and 13 June 2008 (HPA, 2008). Interested parties were
asked to participate through a variety of means, including
a written consultation and a stakeholder workshop. The
consultation process adhered to the Code of Practice on
Consultation (Cabinet Office, 2005) and is in line with the
six consultation criteria set out in the code.
In total, 102 written consultation responses were received from
individuals, organisations, academics and expert committees
with an interest in one or more areas covered in the Strategy.
A list of respondents to the consultation and a summary of
responses are provided in the consultation report (HPA, 2009a);
a separate report presents the findings of the stakeholder
workshop (HPA, 2009b). Figure 1.1 summarises the types of
respondents providing a written response to the consultation.
A key element in the development of the Strategy in the UK has
been taking into consideration the views of children and young
people. They have been engaged from an early stage to ensure
this Strategy meets their needs and priorities. This process has
included looking at their understanding and awareness about
Figure 1.1 Types of respondents providing a written response to the consultation document on the Children’s Environment and Health Strategy for the UK*
Localauthority,�5%
Academic/research,�3%Primarycaretrust,��%
Children’s/youthorganisation,9%
Non-departmentalpublicbody,9%
Professional,8%
Government,7%Industry,2%International,�%
Charity/campaigngroup,�8%
Other,7%
*Thejointresponsesfromfourlocalauthoritiesandprimarycaretrustshavebeencountedseparately.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
��
Box�.4 Majorpoliciesandinitiativesofrelevancetochildren’shealthandwell-being
UK policies
SecuringtheFuture.DeliveringUKSustainableDevelopmentStrategy(HMGovernment,2005)setsouthowthe
governmentaimstodeliverabetterqualityoflifeintheUK,nowandforgenerationstocome,throughensuring
sustainabledevelopment.
England
EveryChildMatters,ChangeforChildren(DfES,2004)setsoutthegovernment’scross-cuttingnationalframeworkfor
everychildtobehealthy,staysafe,enjoyandachieve,makeapositivecontributionandachieveeconomicwell-being.
ChoosingHealth:MakingHealthierChoicesEasier(DH,2004)outlineshowthegovernmentintendstoprovide
supportandinformationsothatindividuals’canmakehealthierchoices.Thisincludestargetstoreduceinfant
mortality,supportallchildrentoattaingoodphysicalandmentalhealth,reduceinequalities,andensurechildren
developagoodunderstandingofopportunitiesandrisksinchoicesthatimpacttheirhealth.
Children’sPlan:BuildingBrighterFutures(DCSF,2007)aimstomakeEnglandthebestplaceintheworldforchildren
andyoungpeopletogrowup.Itfocusesonstrengtheningsupportforfamilies,workingtowardsachievingworld
classschoolsandensuringchildrenhavemoreplacestoplay.
HealthyLives,BrighterFutures:theStrategyforChildrenandYoungPeople’sHealth(DCSFandDH,2009)presents
thegovernment’svisionforchildren’sandyoungpeople’shealthandwell-beingbyimprovingservicesandoutcomes
andminimisinghealthinequalities.
TackingHealthInequalities:AProgrammeforAction(DH,2003)isthecurrentcross-governmentstrategytocombat
healthinequalitiesandlaysthefoundationformeetingthegovernment’stargetstoreducethehealthgaponinfant
mortalityandlifeexpectancyby20�0.
Northern Ireland
InvestingforHealth(DHSSPS,2002)isthepublichealthstrategyforNorthernIrelandsettingouthowtoimprove
healthinNorthernIrelandandreducehealthinequalities.
OurChildrenandYoungPeople–OurPledge(OFMDFM,2006)isastrategyandactionplanaimedatensuring
children in Northern Ireland thrive and look to the future with confidence.
Scotland
TowardsaHealthierScotland (Scottish Office, 1999) is a public health strategy for Scotland with a focus on health
inequalitiesandimprovingchildrenandyoungpeople’shealth.
ImprovingHealthinScotland(ScottishExecutive,2005)providesaframeworktosupportanactiveprogrammeto
deliverhealthimprovementpolicyinScotland.
BetterHealth,BetterCare(ScottishGovernment,2007)setsoutthegovernment’sprogrammetodeliverahealthier
Scotlandbyhelpingpeopletosustainandimprovetheirhealth,especiallyindisadvantagedcommunities,ensuring
better,localandfasteraccesstohealthcare.
GoodPlaces,BetterHealth.ANewApproachtoEnvironmentandHealthinScotland(ScottishGovernment,2008a)is
an implementation plan looking at how the physical environment influences health.
EarlyYearsFramework(ScottishGovernment,2008b)setsouttheimportanceofgettingtheearlyyearsofachild’s
liferight(pre-birthto8yearsold)andgivingchildrenthebeststartinlife.
Wales
HealthChallengeWales(http://new.wales.gov.uk/hcwsubsite/healthchallenge/?lang=en)isaninitiativetoimprove
andprotecthealthandwell-beinginWales.
ChildrenandYoungPeople:RightstoAction(WelshAssemblyGovernment,2004)isthestrategicapproachadopted
inWalestoimproveoutcomesforchildrenandyoungpeoplefrombirthtoadulthood.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
�2
the health effects of their environment and has highlighted the
issues which they consider important.
Detailed comments from the consultation document,
consultation with young people and stakeholder workshop
were used to inform and update this Strategy. In taking forward
particular comments, consideration was given to the technical
merit of the responses, the strength of views expressed, and
the practicality of particular suggestions. Expert opinion,
scientific evidence, relevance and value judgements were used
in selecting areas that should be revised in the Strategy from
the responses received.
1.7 Structure of the Children’s Environment and Health Strategy
This Strategy identifies priority areas to be taken forward in
the UK to continue to reduce the burden of disease in children
from environmental risk factors and promote good health
and well-being. This will help ensure a coherent approach is
taken across the UK to meeting the commitments made under
CEHAPE. It is recognised that the areas highlighted as priorities
in the Strategy may be adapted to meet specific local needs. It
will be important to undertake interventions that will generate
cost-effective benefits to children and young people’s health.
This Strategy is structured according to Regional Priority Goal
areas to reflect the format of the WHO CEHAPE priorities. The
information presented in Chapters 2–5 includes an overview
of the burden of disease, current status in terms of addressing
each specific Regional Priority Goal area and the areas that
may need to be addressed in the UK in the future. Within
each section examples of good practice or information on the
current state are presented to illustrate progress in specific
areas. Suggested interventions from the consultation are
presented in highlighted boxes in each chapter. The views
of children and young people are summarised in Chapter 6,
and issues relevant to children and young people are also
represented in boxes within each chapter. Overarching issues
and priorities are covered in Chapter 7 and a summary of
recommendations is presented in Chapter 8. Appendix A
summarises the Children’s Environment and Health Strategy
priorities according to Regional Priority Goal and to the burden
of disease. Unless specified, information presented in this
document is applicable to the whole of the UK.
1.8 What next?
The Strategy identifies areas where the environment
impacts on the health and well-being of children and young
people in the UK. Recommendations for action highlighted
within the Regional Priority Goals should be considered for
implementation by the relevant responsible local or national
government departments and organisations in order to realise
the health benefits of the Strategy.
An important element of the success of the Children’s
Environment and Health Strategy will be the engagement and
involvement of those with local and regional responsibility for
public health and the environment to ensure local action is
taken to address environmental hazards that are of relevance
to children and young people. These health professionals
include regional directors of public health, local and regional
authorities, directors of public health in primary care trusts,
public health observatories, directors of children’s services,
as well as environmental health professionals, environmental
health officers, environmental specialists (e.g. on air pollution
and contaminated land), land-use planners and other specialists
with an interest in public health, and the Local and Regional
Services of the Health Protection Agency.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
�3
�4
2.1 Why is this important?
In the UK, most gastrointestinal disorders are self-limiting and
of short duration and those affected do not necessarily seek
treatment through their General Practitioner’s (GP) surgery
(HPA, 2005). Children, particularly those under five years of age,
generally experience substantially more infectious intestinal
disease compared with the rest of the population (in the under
fives these are primarily caused by rotavirus). This is because
they will have had less prior exposure to such infections and
therefore will have less immunity. Children are more vulnerable
to complications such as dehydration following episodes of
diarrhoea and vomiting, which can result in the need for GP
consultations or, in serious cases, hospital admission.
The number of children and young people who suffer from
infectious intestinal disease as a result of consuming poor
quality drinking water in the UK is not known, but available
data suggests this constitutes only a small proportion of
cases (probably less than 2% of cases, based on data for
cryptosporidiosis*).
Outbreaks† of intestinal infectious disease are still common
in the UK and a significant minority are due to environmental
exposures (as opposed to food-borne outbreaks). In 2006,
25% (i.e. 183 out of 732) of reported outbreaks of infectious
intestinal disease in England and Wales were associated with
schools and 2% (14) with swimming pools (HPA, 2007b).
In Scotland, 3% (10) of outbreaks occurred in schools and
1 incident occurred in a swimming pool (Smith-Palmer
and Brownlie, 2006a,b,c; 2007). The number of children
experiencing infectious intestinal disease acquired from
outdoor bathing in poor quality water (other than swimming
pools) is not known.
2.2 Where are we now?
The UK enjoys a safe public water supply; compliance with
drinking water standards is greater than 99% and the number
of disease outbreaks associated with the public water supply
is low and has been declining for many years (Capleton and
Duarte Davidson, 2007). However, evidence suggests that
private water supplies, which serve a small proportion of the
population (1% in England and Wales, less than 1% in Northern
Ireland and about 3% in Scotland), are of variable quality,
therefore potentially posing a greater risk to children’s health
(HPA, 2007a). New legislation covering private water supplies
came into force in Scotland in 2006; similar legislation for
private water supplies was consulted upon in England in 2008
and is due to be consulted upon for Wales and Northern Ireland
in 2009.
There are a number of initiatives aimed at improving drinking
water quality further, including programmes to reduce the risk
2 Water, Sanitation and Health
Regional Priority Goal I
To prevent and significantly reduce the morbidity
and mortality arising from gastrointestinal
disorders and other health effects, by ensuring that
adequate measures are taken to improve access to
safe and affordable water and adequate sanitation
for all children by:
(a) ensuringthatallchildcareinstitutionsand
schoolsareprovidedwithadequatesafe
waterandbasicsanitation,ensuringsafeand
affordablewaterandadequatesanitation
infrastructureandservicedevelopment,
(b) implementingnationalplanstoincreasethe
proportionofhouseholdswithaccesstosafe
andaffordablewaterandadequatesanitation,
therebyensuringthatallchildrenhaveaccessto
cleanwaterandsanitation,and
(c) raisingawarenessamongthepopulation,
particularlycaregivers,andensuringthe
provisionofeducationonbasichygiene.
(WHO, 2004)
* Cryptosporidiosis is an intestinal infectious disease commonly associated with water supplies.
† Small, localised groups of people infected with a disease.
�5
of not meeting specific drinking water standards and improving
compliance with those standards. A new drinking water quality
standard for lead will come into force in 2013. Currently, levels
of lead must be below 25 micrograms per litre (µg/l), but the
new standard means that levels of lead will have to be below
10 µg/l. A number of actions are currently taking place across
the UK to meet this new standard (Box 2.1).
There has been an increasing number of households
suffering from water poverty as a result of water metering
and rising prices. The impact on children’s health and well-
being is unknown, but it has been suggested that it could
decrease opportunities for play, and be a factor influencing
compliance if, for example, public health advice is issued that
water needs to be flushed through the system following a
contamination incident (e.g. after flooding). It is also likely to
disproportionately affect families on low incomes.
Substantial improvements in bathing water quality have been
made in the UK over the past ten years, with over 96% of UK
bathing waters in 2007 meeting the minimum EU standards,
which entered into force in 2006 (Defra, 2008). However, a
small number of disease outbreaks have been associated with
swimming pools (HPA, 2007a), contributing to an increase in
cryptosporidiosis in local communities.
The UK enjoys excellent sanitation provision, with less than
1% of homes without basic amenities. There are a number
Box2.� Complyingwithareviseddrinking
waterstandardforlead
Actionstoreduceleadlevelsindrinkingwater
includethereplacementofleadpipes,theuseof
phosphatedosing(whichreducestheamountof
leadthatwilldissolveintodrinkingwaterfromlead
pipesandsolder),andthetestingoflevelsofleadin
watersupplies.TheDrinkingWaterInspectoratehas
recommendedthatlocalauthorities(inEnglandand
Wales)reviewhowoftenleadlevelsindrinkingwater
goabovethenewstandard,inordertoidentify
whetheradditionalactionisneededinaparticular
community.Oneexampleofthisispromoting
thefactthatwatercompanieswillreplacetheir
partoftheservicepipewhenthebuildingowner
indicatesthattheyarereplacingtheirdomestic
leadplumbing.Schoolsandchildcarecentresare
ofparticularinterest;theDepartmentforChildren,
SchoolsandFamilieshasrecommendedthatfor
schoolsbuiltbeforetheearly�950stheextentof
leadpipeworkwithintheschoolsshouldbeassessed,
andaprogrammedrawnupforitsremovalwhere
applicable(DfES,2003).
Box2.2 Improvinghygieneinschools
TheHealthProtectionAgencyhasdevelopeda
hygieneandhand-washinginitiativefordelivery
inprimaryschoolsacrossEnglandwhichhasbeen
pilotedin800schools.Itisbeingevaluatedby
lookingatchangesinhand-washingbehaviour,
raisedawarenessoftheimportanceofhand
washing,andareductioninabsenteeismofboth
pupilsandstaff.
FollowinganoutbreakofE.coliinschoolsinSouth
Walesin2005,theWelshAssemblyGovernmenttook
stepstoimprovehygieneandinfectioncontrolin
schools.Theseincludepublicationoftwobooklets:
• Mindthegerms!–distributedtoallnurseries,
playgroupsandotherchildcaresettingsin
Wales,
• Teachgermsalesson–distributedtoallprimary
andsecondaryschoolsinWales.
TheScottishGovernmentlaunchedaNationalHand
HygieneCampaigninJanuary2007.Thecampaign
includedahandhygienepackwhichwasdistributed
toalllocalauthoritynurseriesandprimaryschools
acrossScotlandandincludedaDVD,posters,stickers
andactivitymaterials.Thepackwastestedtoensure
thattheemphasiswasonmakinghandwashing
a‘fun’activityandincludedanumberofuseful
materialstohelpteachersdevelopfunhand-washing
relatedactivities.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
�6
of initiatives throughout the UK to improve the condition of
poor quality housing. For example, in England, an initiative
of the Department for Communities and Local Government
aims to bring all social housing into decent condition by 2010
(DCLG, 2006a).
Several surveys of water and sanitation provision in UK schools
have highlighted a considerable variation in school sanitation
and access to drinking water. In England, the Building Schools
for the Future programme includes a standard specification
layout and design for toilets to help improve facilities (DfES,
2007). A number of initiatives are also under way to improve
personal hygiene in schools (Box 2.2). The Welsh Assembly
Government and the Scottish Government both have ongoing
programmes to improve access to cold, clean drinking water
in schools: the Proposed Healthy Eating in Schools (Wales)
Measure 2008 and the Nutritional Requirements for Food and
Drink in Schools (Scotland) Regulations 2008.
2.3 Areas for improvement
The main areas for the provision of clean water and sanitation
that may benefit from further action are listed below,
together with proposals of how these might be addressed
(Boxes 2.3 and 2.4).
2.3.1 Lead in drinking water
A review of means of further reducing exposure to lead
amongst children in the UK should be undertaken, taking into
account the relative short- and long-term costs and benefits to
children’s health.
There should be a coordinated programme to investigate the
levels of lead in drinking water in homes and schools (especially
in primary schools) and other childcare settings where levels
may be likely to go above the new standard (10 µg/l). This
programme should include childcare institutions and other
locations where children spend substantial periods of time.
2.3.2 Private water supplies
The number of disease outbreaks originating from private
water supplies is higher than that from public supplies. It is
therefore important to develop means to ensure that all private
drinking water supplies are properly documented, that there
is an adequate legislative basis and that compliance with the
standards is high. Further research into and surveillance of the
health impacts of contaminated private water supplies would
also be beneficial.
2.3.3 Water and sanitation in schools and childcare settings
Whilst the health impact of deficiencies in access to water and
sanitary provision in some schools has not been quantified, it
is prudent to continue to encourage and support initiatives to
improve sanitary provision, drinking water provision and hygiene
standards in all childcare settings. Such initiatives should aim to
ensure a consistent, high standard of sanitation facilities, access
to drinking water and hand-washing behaviour in all schools
and childcare settings.
Box2.3 Examplesofsuggestedinterventions
toreduceleadindrinkingwater
Riskmappingtoidentifywhereleadlevelsarelikely
togoabovethenewstandardof�0µg/l.
Banningtheuseofleadsolderonallpipework,
includingheatingsystems,toreducetheriskofits
useonwaterpipes.
Replacingleadpipeworkwhenandwherepossible.
Young people consider that Water and sanitation are a priority for most children and young people, particularly in the school environment. The most important issues raised by young people include: access to safe, clean toilet facilities and drinking water in schools, hygiene and hand washing.
�7
2.3.4 Bathing and recreational waters
There is currently a paucity of evidence on the health effects
of use of outdoor bathing and recreational waters in children
and consideration could be given to addressing this gap.
Also, further research on the use by children of recreational
waters other than beaches could help identify areas for
future action.
Although there are few cryptosporidium outbreaks attributed
to swimming pools, it is important that these continue to
be investigated to identify common factors so interventions,
such as water treatment regimes, can be developed further
to prevent future outbreaks. Environmental health officers
in local authorities in England no longer routinely submit
samples to the Health Protection Agency for swimming pool
monitoring, but instead rely upon self-monitoring by swimming
pool operators; continued monitoring of outbreaks associated
with swimming pools should be maintained to assess the
effectiveness of this new policy.
2.3.5 Water poverty
The impact of water poverty on children’s health and well-
being is not known. Measures should be taken to evaluate the
number of households at risk from water poverty and how
this may affect children’s health and well-being, with a view
to ensuring that children and families have access to all the
wholesome water they reasonably need.
Box2.4 Examplesofsuggestedinterventions
toimprovesanitationandaccess
towaterinschoolsandchildcare
settings
Setminimumstandardsofprovision,accessand
hygienestandardsfordrinkingwaterandtoiletsin
alleducationalestablishments.
Developguidanceforschoolinspectors(e.g.Ofsted
inEngland,EstyninWales)onminimumstandards
forsanitationandaccesstowaterinschoolsand
inspectagainstthesestandards.
Addprovisionandmaintenanceoftoiletstothe
NationalHealthySchoolsProgrammeNationalAudit
Criteria(HealthySchools,2007)andcorresponding
schemesinthedevolvedadministrations.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
�8
3.1 Why is this important?
Injuries are a leading cause of death and hospital admission
among children aged 0–14 years in the UK. In 2006,
299 children in the UK died as a result of unintentional injuries,
approximately half of whom were injured in transport accidents
(calculated from GROS, 2007, NISRA, 2007, and ONS, 2008b).
Injuries to children in the UK account for approximately
2 million visits to hospital accident and emergency
departments each year at a cost of over £146 million (Audit
Commission and Healthcare Commission, 2007). The number
of deaths caused by unintentional injuries amongst children
and young people has been declining for many years in the UK
(HPA, 2007a) and is amongst the lowest in developed nations
(UNICEF, 2007).
Obesity is a serious and growing public health problem in the
UK. The prevalence of overweight and obese children and
young people has increased rapidly in recent years (Figure 3.1).
For example, in England the prevalence of obesity in boys
and girls (aged 2–15 years) has risen from 11% and 12%,
respectively, in 1995, to 17% in boys and 15% in girls in 2006
(The Information Centre, 2008). In 2004, about a third of boys
(32.6%) and girls (34.1%) aged 2–15 years in England were
either overweight or obese. Similar proportions of overweight
and obese children have been found in Scotland. In Northern
Ireland, approximately 10% of 2–10 year olds are obese. It is
predicted that if obesity continues to increase at the same rate,
by 2025 approximately 15% of children and young people aged
under 20 years will be obese (current levels: 8% boys, 10% girls;
Government Office for Science, 2007).
3.2 Where are we now?
3.2.1 Unintentional injuries
A range of initiatives aimed at preventing unintentional injuries
have contributed to the decline in deaths. These include
better building design, product and toy safety improvements,
education initiatives, better car and road environment designs,
and comprehensive road safety policies with a specific focus
3 Accidents, Injuries, Obesity and Physical Activity
Regional Priority Goal II
Prevent and substantially reduce health
consequences from accidents and injuries and
pursue a decrease in morbidity from lack of
adequate physical activity, by promoting safe,
secure and supportive human settlements for all
children. This will be addressed by:
(a) developing,implementingandenforcingstrict
child-specific measures that will better protect
childrenandadolescentsfrominjuriesatand
aroundtheirhomes,playgrounds,schoolsand
workplaces,
(b) advocatingthestrengthenedimplementation
ofroadsafetymeasures,includingadequate
speedlimitsaswellaseducationfordriversand
children,andenforcementofthecorresponding
legislation,
(c) advocating,supportingandimplementing
child-friendlyurbanplanninganddevelopment
aswellassustainabletransportplanningand
mobilitymanagement,bypromotingcycling,
walkingandpublictransport,inorderto
providesaferandhealthiermobilitywithinthe
community,and
(d) providingandadvocatingsafeandaccessible
facilities(includinggreenareas,natureand
playgrounds)forsocialinteraction,playand
sportsforchildrenandadolescents.
Bring about a reduction in the prevalence of
overweight and obesity by:
(a) implementinghealthpromotionactivitiesin
accordancewithWHOstrategiesandaction
plansondiet,physicalactivityandhealth,and
foodandnutritionand
(b) promoting the benefits of physical activity in
children’sdailylifebyprovidinginformationand
education,aswellaspursuingopportunities
forpartnershipsandsynergieswithother
sectorswiththeaimofensuringachild-friendly
infrastructure.
(WHO, 2004)
�9
Road traffic injuries are addressed through separate, but
complementary policies to those targeting other unintentional
injuries. The number of children and young people killed
or seriously injured as a result of accidents on the road has
declined in the last six years. The reduction has exceeded the
target set in the government’s strategy Tomorrow’s Roads:
Safer for Everyone to reduce deaths and serious injuries
amongst children by 50%† by 2010 in England, Scotland
and Wales (DfT, 2000). Recently, a road safety strategy for
children has been published, which amongst its priorities
includes promoting good practice in road safety education for
children, communicating road safety messages to children and
encouraging the use of 20 miles per hour traffic zones (DfT,
2007). Northern Ireland has a separate, but similar road safety
strategy also with a target to reduce children’s deaths and
serious injuries by 50% (DoE(NI), 2002).
Data from the All Wales Injury Surveillance System (Figure 3.2),
which shows the distribution of hospital admissions for
accidental injury by age and setting, highlights the importance
on children. However, there remain substantial socioeconomic
differences. Children living in more deprived areas have much
higher rates of unintentional injury. For example, children of
parents who have never worked or are long-term unemployed
are 13 times more likely to die from unintentional injuries
(Edwards et al, 2006).
In England, the government is committed to reduce the
number of unintentional and deliberate injuries to children
and young people through a public service agreement
(HM Government, 2008b). This is underpinned by the Staying
Safe Action Plan (DCSF, 2008). The Children’s Plan for England
(DCSF, 2007) highlights the need for a proportionate approach
to health and safety to allow children to take risks while
staying safe. Similar initiatives are in place in the devolved
administrations. For example, in Scotland recommendations for
improved child safety have been put forward in the Child Safety
Strategy (RoSPA, 2007), in Northern Ireland reducing injuries
is part of Investing for Health (DHSSPS, 2002), and in Wales
addressing injuries is a key theme of Health Challenge Wales*.
* Health Challenge Wales, http://new.wales.gov.uk/hcwsubsite/healthchallenge/?lang=en.
Figure 3.1 Prevalence of overweight children in the UK up to 17 years old (adapted from International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2007)
%overweight
<5
5–9.9
�0–�4.9
�5–�9.9
20–24.9
25–29.9
>30
Datanotavailable
(a)Boys
(b)Girls
Priorto�990�990–�9992000–2006
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
† Compared with the average for 1994–98.
20
of improved home safety for children under the age of 5 years.
It also illustrates the value of enhanced injury surveillance. Falls
in the home are the most common injury for those under
2 years old and falls account for 44% of all hospital admissions
for unintentional injuries for those under 14 years (Figure 3.3)
(HPA, 2005).
Accurate local and national health surveillance of injury rates
amongst children and young people is essential to develop
an accurate picture of injuries and enable the impact of
interventions to be monitored and evaluated effectively. Until
2003 the Department for Trade and Industry operated the
Home and Leisure Accident Surveillance Schemes. There are
regional injury surveillance schemes such as the All Wales
Injury Surveillance System and the Northwest England Trauma
and Injury Intelligence Group*, but there is currently no injury
surveillance system that gives detailed information about
accidents involving children for the whole of the UK. Recording
of UK accident and injury rates for children compares poorly
to information from countries with embedded national
injury surveillance systems (Lyons et al, 2002; Kirkwood and
Pollock, 2008). The Injury Observatory of Britain collates basic
information provided by hospital accident and emergency
departments, regional observatories and other partners. The
Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) and
industry partners are undertaking a feasibility study to create
an all-injury UK-wide surveillance system which would have
increased information (i.e. include product information) over
and above the minimum accident and emergency data set.
Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate
injuries to children and young people are one of the national
indicators for local authorities and local authority partnerships
in England and will help drive national and local delivery of
work to improve children’s and young people’s safety and meet
public service agreement targets (HM Government, 2008b).
There are many schemes which aim to educate children on
how to recognise and manage risks associated with accidental
injuries and poisonings (e.g. LASER, Crucial Crew and Junior
Road Safety Officers†). Educating parents and carers of children
about the most common accidents would help them develop
a more balanced view of risks and would help to reduce a
risk-averse culture that may inhibit children’s emotional and
physical development.
† The LASER (Learning About Safety by Experiencing Risk) Project, http://www.rospa.com/safetyeducation/laser/index.htm; Crucial Crew, http://www.crucial-crew.org; and Junior Road Safety Officer, http://www.jrso.com.
Figure 3.2 Distribution of unintentional injuries involving children and young people in Wales by age and location in 2004 (All Wales Injury Surveillance System, 2006)
Age,years
0–4
5–9
�0–�4
�5–�9
Home
Inju
ries
req
uir
ing
acc
iden
tan
dem
erg
ency
att
end
ance
Work School RTA Sport Public Other Unknown
�6,000
�4,000
�2,000
�0,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
* Trauma and Injury Intelligence Group, http://www.nwpho.org.uk/ait/.
2�
3.2.2 Obesity and physical activity
The Foresight Programme report on obesity sets out the scale
and complexity of the problem and highlights the influences
driving the long-term trend for weight gain across the UK
(Government Office for Science, 2007). Obesity is a complex
issue with a number of factors having a significant influence:
• there are some significant regional differences in
obesity prevalence (all ages) with a higher prevalence
in Scotland and the north of England,
• in families where both parents are overweight or
obese, children are significantly more likely to be
overweight or obese themselves,
• inequalities are also an important risk factor as
children and young people from more deprived
socioeconomic backgrounds have a higher prevalence
of obesity than their more affluent peers.
Other influences on the proportion of overweight and obese
children include physical activity levels, diet, education and
lifestyle factors.
A healthy balanced diet is an important factor in reducing
obesity. Parents and children need to understand more about
healthy eating, nutrition and health. There are a number of initiatives, including the Healthy Schools* and Health Promoting Schools† schemes and the 5-A-Day‡ initiative, which are helping
to address this. The impact of poor maternal nutrition on the
health and well-being of children and its effect on a healthy
lifestyle are also important.
The influence of marketing of high fat, salt and sugar foods is
a cause for concern. Box 3.1 highlights measures to reduce
the impact of ‘junk food’ TV advertising on children and
young people.
In England, the government has recently developed a public
service agreement target to ‘halt the year on year rise in
obesity among children under 11 by 2010’ (HM Government,
2008a). Additionally, the Children’s Plan (DCSF, 2007) and the
Healthy Weight, Healthy Lives Strategy (DH and DCSF, 2008)
set out a goal to reduce the proportion of overweight and
* Healthy Schools, http://www.healthyschools.gov.uk.† Health Promoting Schools, http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/healthpromotingschools/.‡ 5-A-Day, http://www.5aday.nhs.uk.
Figure 3.3 Hospital admissions as a result of unintentional injury amongst 0–14 year olds in England in 2005/06 (Hospital Episode Statistics, 2006)
Landtransportaccidents,9%
Accidentalpoisoningbyandexposuretonoxioussubstances,6.2%
Contactwithheatandhotsubstances,2.9%Exposure to smoke, fire and flames, 0.4%
Falls,44.7%
Exposuretoinanimatemechanicalforces,�8.7%
Otheraccidents,�6.0%
Accidentaldrowningandsubmersion,0.2%
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
22
obese children in the population to 2000 levels by 2020.
Tackling obesity is now one of the national requirements for
primary care trusts, in collaboration with local authorities and
other partners.
Low physical activity levels and sedentary behaviours are
associated with obesity amongst children and may be both a
cause and consequence of being overweight. There have been
significant changes in patterns of physical activity in children
across the UK (HPA, 2007a). From 1992 to 2003 there was a
9% decrease in the number of journeys to school made on foot
by children aged 5–10 years and a 5% decrease for 11–16 year
olds, with a corresponding increase in the number of journeys
by car.
In contrast, in England, there has been an increase in the
percentage of pupils participating in at least two hours of high
quality physical education and school sport (from 62% to 86%
between 2003/04 and 2006/07) in schools participating in the
Box3.� Restrictingadvertisingofhighfat,
saltandsugarfoodstochildren
Advertisementsmustavoidanythinglikelyto
encouragepoornutritionalhabitsoranunhealthy
lifestyleinchildren,andshouldnotemploy
‘pester-power’;promotionaloffersshouldbe
usedresponsibly(includingcartooncharacter
endorsements);andnutritionalclaimsneed
to be supported by sound scientific evidence.
Advertisementsforhighfat,saltandsugarfoods
arenotpermittedinoraroundprogrammesof
particularappealto4–�5yearoldsfrom�January
2008andwillbebannedfromallchildren’schannels
from�January2009(Ofcom,2007).
Box3.2 Examplesofinitiativesaimedatincreasingphysicalactivityamongstchildrenand
youngpeople
InEngland theNationalPhysicalEducation,SchoolSportandClubLinksStrategyprovidedgovernmentandlottery
fundingtoimproveschoolsportingfacilitiesandphysicaleducationupto2008.Theoverallobjectivehasbeento
enhancetheuptakeofsportingopportunitiesfor5–�6yearoldssothatatleast85%ofchildrenwilldotwohours
ofsportorexerciseaweekby2008.Theaimisthatby20�0allchildrenwillbeofferedatleastfourhoursofsport
everyweek.
InNorthern Ireland theFitFuturesimplementationplanaimstohalttheriseinobesityinchildrenandyoung
peopleby20�0.Theregionalstrategyforhealthandwell-beingbuildsonatargetofreducinglevelsofobesity
by50%by2025.
InScotlandtheNationalActivityStrategyScotlandaimsfor80%ofallchildrenunder�7yearstomeetthe
minimumrecommendedlevelsofphysicalactivityby2022.TheimplementationoftheSchools(HealthPromotion
andNutrition)Act2007andmajorprogrammesinschools,suchasActiveSchools,Y-DanceSchoolandTravel
Coordinators,andcommunityprogrammesincludingPathstoHealth,JogScotland,BeyondtheSchoolGatesand
GirlsontheMove,shouldcontributetowardsmeetingtheminimumrecommendedlevelsofphysicalactivity.
InWales,theClimbingHigherStrategyisa20-yearplanforsportandphysicalactivityforthewholepopulation.
Itincludesensuringyoungpeoplehaveawiderangeofpositivesportingandphysicalactivityexperiencesin
secondaryschool.InJune2006theFoodandFitness–PromotingHealthyEatingandPhysicalActivityforChildren
andYoungPeopleinWales5YearImplementationPlanwaslaunched,whichaimstosupportparents,childrenand
young people in their efforts to eat well, stay fit and achieve the highest possible standard of health.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
23
School Sport Partnership Programme (The Information Centre,
2008). Examples of programmes to promote physical activity,
exercise and healthy eating throughout the UK are shown in
Box 3.2.
3.2.3 Access to green spaces
Having safe and accessible playgrounds and green spaces
benefits children through opportunities for play, social
interaction and controlled risk taking that, in turn, have positive
impacts on their physical, mental and emotional health and
well-being. Well-planned urban environments that take into
account the needs of children and young people also can
facilitate children’s access to facilities and independence.
However, opportunities for play can be limited by factors such
as a lack of access to and conflicts over use of local space, the
distance of the play area from home, safety fears and the need
for parental permissions to take part in particular activities or to
go to certain places. A number of initiatives are in place across
the UK to improve children’s access to safe and suitable play
facilities, and to encourage participation of children and young
people in the planning, transport and infrastructure process.
Also, in England, the Children’s Plan sets out proposals to create
more safe places for children to play outdoors in the natural
environment (DCSF, 2007).
3.3 Areas for improvement
A number of areas that may benefit from further action are
listed below, together with proposals of how these might
be addressed (Boxes 3.3 and 3.4).
3.3.1 Unintentional injuries
Most injuries result from accidents in the home or road traffic
accidents; there are also considerable inequalities between
different groups. It is important to ensure that unintentional
injuries are given the same high priority throughout the UK
to ensure the same high levels of safety regardless of where
children live. There is a need for a more coordinated approach
to injury prevention. It is also important that a proportionate
approach is taken towards health and safety and injury
reduction to ensure children’s opportunities to experience risk
and participate in physical activity are not adversely restricted.
Improved risk and safety education and awareness are
also required.
Accurate surveillance of unintentional injuries, at local and
national level, is essential to enable the proper evaluation
of initiatives to reduce unintentional deaths and injuries
amongst children and young people. A feasibility study
under way by RoSPA and industry partners for a UK-wide
injury surveillance system may provide a means of ensuring
such surveillance.
3.3.2 Obesity and physical activity
A number of guidelines, policies and initiatives are in place to
promote healthy eating and counteract the increased trend in
overweight and obese children coupled with a lack of physical
activity. However, it is essential that systems are in place to
monitor and evaluate the success of these strategies. Currently,
a national child measurement programme operates in England
Young people consider thatOutdoor exercise and play are most important as they have the biggest effect on health, especially in relation to their mental health and happiness. Access to safe, clean green open spaces for play and exercise is an area where there was most call for improvement.Healthy eating is important and is linked to preventing obesity.Gangs, knife crime, accidents, computer games and parental concerns are barriers to outdoor play.
Box3.3 Examplesofsuggestedinterventions
toreduceunintentionalinjuries
UK-wideimplementationofsuccessfulinterventions
toincludepracticalroadsafetyprogrammes,such
as Kerbcraft* and of 20 mph traffic zones around
schoolsandplayareas.
Cycletrainingandpromotingsafecyclingforall
schoolchildren.
Homesafetyawarenesscampaignsandhome
safetysupportandtrainingandadviceforvisiting
midwivesandhealthvisitors.
Fittingthermostaticvalvestonewandrefurbish
buildingstoreducethenumbersofscaldinjuriesto
children(asmandatoryinScotlandsince2006).
*Kerbcraft:roadsafetytraining,http://www.kerbcraft.org.
24
to measure obesity in Reception (age 4–5 years) and Year 6
(age 10–11 years). It is important that similar initiatives are
taken forward throughout the UK to ensure obesity levels are
monitored consistently. Similar initiatives are also required to
monitor changes in physical activity levels.
3.3.3 Access to green spaces
A strategic approach is required to ensure that all children and
young people have easy access to safe and well-maintained
green, open spaces that are in easy reach of their homes
so they can take full advantage of the benefits that such
spaces can provide. Over 80% of the population in the UK
lives in urban areas so healthy urban planning should be a
priority for the future. There should be improved planning
guidance and wider involvement of a range of stakeholders
(including children) in planning and developing green spaces
to ensure that they meet the needs of children and the
wider community.
Box3.4 Examplesofsuggestedinterventions
toimprovephysicalactivityand
accesstogreenspaces
TheNationalInstituteforHealthandClinical
Excellenceguidelinesonphysicalactivityandthe
environment(NICE,2008)andNaturalEngland’s
standardonaccessiblegreenspace*shouldbe
appliedwhenplanninganddesigningurbanand
ruraldevelopments.
Achild’srighttoplayshouldbeexplicitly
acknowledgedbytheUKgovernment.
*NaturalEngland:Greenspace,availableathttp://www.english-nature.org.uk/special/greenspace/.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
25
26
4.1 Why is this important?
Children and young people can be more susceptible to the
effects of poor air quality, both indoors and outdoors, as their
lungs are still developing and they take in proportionately more
air than adults (WHO, 2005b). Although the actual health
impacts are difficult to quantify, indoor and outdoor air pollution
can adversely affect children’s health in a number of ways.
Indoor air pollution (e.g. from fossil fuel appliances and
environmental tobacco smoke) has been linked with
increases in lower respiratory tract infections, rhinitis, cough,
exacerbation of wheeze and asthma, and effects on the foetus.
Chronic carbon monoxide exposure can lead to behavioural
deficits in children and harm the unborn child; also children can
be particularly susceptible as they may suffer health effects in
a shorter period of time than an adult breathing in the same
concentration of carbon monoxide (HPA, 2007c). Exposure to
high levels of carbon monoxide can be fatal.
Outdoor air pollution (e.g. from vehicle exhausts, industry and
the products of combustion) has been associated with a range
of respiratory effects in children. For example, high levels of
outdoor air pollution have been linked with exacerbation of
asthma and respiratory tract infections and the evidence on the
health effects linked to living in proximity to major roads and
traffic is increasing (e.g. Gauderman et al, 2007).
Whilst not a cause, air pollution can exacerbate asthma;
an estimated 30% of the acute exacerbations of asthma in
children are related to outdoor air pollution (HPA, 2005).
Deaths from asthma in the UK are rare, but amongst children
and young people, asthma is a major reason for General
Practitioner (GP) consultations and hospital admissions.
Between 1955 and 2004 the prevalence of asthma increased
in children two- to three-fold, but has flattened or may even
have fallen recently (Anderson et al, 2007). However, GP
consultations for asthma amongst children and young people
have been declining since the mid-1990s, probably as a result
of improved medical care (Anderson et al, 2007). In 2005 GP
consultations for asthma in England and Wales were 275 and
462 per 10,000 amongst 1–4 and 5–14 year olds, respectively
(RCGP, 2006); hospital admissions for asthma in 2006 were 45
and 23 per 10,000 for 0–4 and 5–14 years olds, respectively, in
the UK (Lung and Asthma Information Agency, 2008).
Regional Priority Goal III
Prevent and reduce respiratory disease due
to outdoor and indoor air pollution, thereby
contributing to a reduction in the frequency of
asthmatic attacks, in order to ensure that children
can live in an environment with clean air. This is to
be achieved through:
(a) developingindoorairqualitystrategiesthattake
into account the specific needs of children,
(b) implementingtheFrameworkConvention
onTobaccoControlandsettinguphealth
promotionprogrammesthatwillreduce
smokingprevalenceandtheexposureof
pregnantwomenandchildrentoenvironmental
tobaccosmoke,
(c) improvingaccessofhouseholdstohealthierand
saferheatingandcookingsystemsaswellas
cleanerfuel,
(d) applyingandenforcingregulationstoimprove
indoorairquality,especiallyinhousing,
childcarecentresandschools,withparticular
referencetoconstructionandfurnishing
materials,and
(e) reducingemissionsofoutdoorairpollutants
fromtransport-related,industrialandother
sourcesthroughappropriatelegislationand
regulatorymeasureswhichensurethatair
qualitystandardssuchasthosedevelopedunder
EUlegislationtakeintoaccountthevaluessetby
theWHOAirQualityGuidelinesforEurope.
(WHO, 2004)
4 Respiratory Health, Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollution
27
4.2 Where are we now?
4.2.1 Indoor air pollution
Currently there is a lack of coordinated action to improve
indoor air quality. Building regulations set standards for
ventilation in buildings, including schools and childcare settings.
Voluntary measures and improved understanding are also
important in improving indoor air quality.
There have been a number of public health initiatives aimed
at reducing children’s exposure to environmental tobacco
smoke; a recent example is shown in Figure 4.2. A smoking ban
was introduced in Scotland in 2006 and in England, Northern
Ireland and Wales in 2007, which prohibits smoking in any
public building, workplace, vehicle or other enclosed structure
other than an individual’s own home or car. There have been
some concerns that the ban may result in a displacement of
smoking to the home, which could lead to increased exposure
of children and young people to tobacco smoke. However,
a study in Scotland has shown that the ban on smoking
in public places has resulted in a reduction in exposure to
Figure 4.1 Number of days exceeding 50 µg/m3 (particles) compared with health objective for 2004: urban sites 1992–2006 (Defra, 2006)
�992
Nu
mb
ero
fd
ays
Year
Sites with insufficient data capture are excluded
2006
�80
�60
�40
�20
�00
80
60
20
0
40
�994 �996 �998 2000 2002 2004
Average
HighestsitevalueexcludingLondonMaryleboneRoad
Objectivelevel*
Lowestsitevalue
*Objectivelevel:nottoexceed50µg/m3onmorethan35daysby3�December2004.
Figure 4.2 Warning on tobacco products highlighting the need to protect children from exposure to tobacco smoke (Source: Department of Health)
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
28
environmental tobacco smoke amongst children and young
people, particularly in families where neither parent smokes
or only the father smokes (Akhtar et al, 2007). Similar studies
have been commissioned by the Welsh Assembly Government
and the Department of Health, Social Services and Public
Safety in Northern Ireland. During 2008 the Department of
Health consulted on the future of tobacco control, part of
which specifically considered protecting children and young
people from smoking and invited comments on whether
more should be done to protect children from exposure to
environmental tobacco smoke at home and in private vehicles
(DH, 2008a).
Deaths from carbon monoxide exposure amongst children have
declined substantially over the past ten years and now there
are fewer than ten deaths per year (HPA, 2007a). However,
there is evidence of a lack of awareness of the dangers of
carbon monoxide exposure amongst the general public in
the UK and potentially an increasing problem in vulnerable
groups. Recently concern has been raised about the potential
for chronic carbon monoxide poisoning in home environments
that may be undetected and unreported (Wright, 2002). To
help improve gas safety, the Health and Safety Executive has
announced a new gas registration scheme for gas installers that
will run for the next ten years (HSE, 2008).
4.2.2 Outdoor air pollution
Outdoor air quality in the UK has improved greatly over the
past few decades; however, there are still localised areas
(Figure 4.1) where people are exposed to high pollution
episodes (O’Connell and Duarte-Davidson, 2007). Current UK
legislation sets standards and objectives for a variety of outdoor
air pollutants known to have health effects; this legislation
reflects mandatory European Air Quality Limit Values. Local
authorities have a statutory responsibility to produce local
air quality management plans which identify areas where
air pollution is likely to exceed statutory limits and outline
how these will be addressed. In addition, there are initiatives
aimed at keeping people informed about local air pollution
(e.g. Box 4.1).
The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and
Northern Ireland (Defra et al, 2007) provides a framework
within which air quality policies are taken forward for the UK
and enables actions to be taken to improve and provide advice
on air quality where necessary.
There are a number of initiatives aimed at promoting more
sustainable means of transport to and from school, which in
turn can help reduce traffic congestion and have beneficial
impacts on air pollution. Section 7.3 provides further details
and examples of such initiatives.
There are inequalities in the distribution of air pollution, with
the most deprived areas in England, Scotland and Northern
Ireland generally experiencing higher pollutant concentrations
(NETCEN, 2005). This is largely because most deprived
communities are in urban areas, which typically experience
higher levels of air pollution (HPA, 2007a)*.
* In Wales, the most deprived communities are in rural areas and, therefore, typically do not experience high air pollution episodes.
Box4.� airTEXT–keepingpeopleinformed
aboutlocalairpollution
airTEXTisaserviceprovidedthroughoutLondon
thatsendsairpollutionalertsandhealthadvice
tothosewhoaremostlikelytobeaffectedbyair
pollution.Textsaresentwhenpollutionlevelsreach
moderateorhigherinmorethanone-tenthofthe
selectedLondonborough.Thisserviceisavailable
toall,anditisafreeserviceforpeoplewithasthma,
emphysema,bronchitis,heartdiseaseorangina,or
forpeoplelivingorworkinginLondon.Thereisan
onlineregistrationformandalertscanbereceived
bytext,recordedvoicemessageorbye-mail.Alerts
aresenteithertheeveningbeforeorthemorning
ofanexpectedairpollutionepisode,allowing
individualstoprepareandrespondaccordingly.Each
alertcontainsbriefinformationaboutsymptomsand
healthadvice.
Young people consider that Air pollution was an area of concern and was recognised as something that directly affects their health; they supported the need for clean fresh air and green unpolluted spaces.
Car pollution was a main area of concern and was recognised as having an impact on their health and well‑being.
There was overwhelming support for further restrictions on smoking, including a complete ban.
29
4.3 Areas for improvement
A number of areas that may benefit from further action are
listed below, together with proposals of how these might
be addressed (Boxes 4.2 and 4.3).
4.3.1 Indoor air pollution
Provision of a coordinated policy approach, action plan and
improving public information on indoor air quality would be
beneficial. Currently there is a lack of coordinated action within
government to improve indoor air quality and it is important
to establish where overall responsibility lies. There may also
be benefits in preparing an action plan to address indoor air
quality. In particular, more work may be needed to increase
public awareness of the risks associated with carbon monoxide
exposure and the importance of properly maintained fossil-
fuelled appliances. Public awareness campaigns that have
worked well for smoke detectors in the UK could also be used
for carbon monoxide monitors.
Further research to quantify the incidence and impact of
chronic carbon monoxide poisoning may be beneficial. This
should specifically consider whether children are more severely
affected than adults and, if necessary, identify ways to prevent
such exposures.
Continued efforts should be made to educate adults as to the
effects of smoking on children’s health and encourage them
to continue to minimise children’s exposure. With the advent
of the ban on smoking in public places and the restriction on
the sale of tobacco to the over 18 year olds, children’s primary
source of exposure will now almost certainly be the home
and car environments. As socioeconomic status is one of the
primary determinants of children’s exposure to environmental
tobacco smoke, it is important to focus efforts towards the
most vulnerable groups.
4.3.2 Outdoor air pollution
Local air quality management Guidance on local air quality
action plans should be extended to include measures which
can be taken to reduce the exposure of susceptible groups,
including children. Outdoor air quality policy and legislation
focuses on achieving health-based air quality objectives in
all areas where people are exposed. Action plans developed
by local authorities could prioritise more susceptible groups,
including children, within the general population, and guidance
could be provided on what actions are practical and effective.
Evidence in this area is sparse, and care must be taken not
to move the problem to other locations where sensitive or
vulnerable groups are exposed.
Improving understanding Evidence on the health effects
linked to proximity to major roads and traffic is increasing and
may have implications beyond childhood in to adult life. This
is an area that requires a review of the available literature and
evidence in order to determine the best course of action.
Box4.2 Examplesofsuggestedinterventions
toreducetheimpactofsmokingon
children
Publiceducationcampaignstopromoteamessage
thatitisunacceptabletosmokewhenchildrenare
around.
Measurestoprohibitsmokinginprivatecarscarrying
children.
Legislationtoremovetobaccoproductsfromviewin
retailoutlets(asinScotland).
Box4.3 Examplesofsuggestedinterventions
toreduceexposuretooutdoorair
pollution
Extension of successful zones that reduce traffic
emissions,suchastheLondonLowEmissionZone.
Sitingofnewschools,childcarefacilitiesand
playareasshouldincludeanassessmentofthe
surroundingairquality.
Implementationoftheexposurereduction
frameworkforparticles,assetoutintheAirQuality
Strategy(Defraetal,2007).
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
30
5.1 Why is this important?
Children in the UK are exposed to a range of chemical, physical
and biological hazards, some with chronic or cumulative
exposure that have effects on their health and well-being. The
impacts of many of these are difficult to quantify as available
data is limited.
The main known health effects of exposure to chemical,
physical and biological hazards on children in the UK are
highlighted below.
5.1.1 Chemicals
The number of deaths and hospital admissions of children and
young people as a result of unintentional poisonings declined
overall between 2000 and 2007 by about 50%, whereas the
number of hospital admissions remained approximately the
same (HPA, 2007a; ONS, 2008c). In 2007, 23 children and
young people (under the age of 15 years) died in England
and Wales (ONS, 2008c) and, in 2006/07, 10,150 children and
young people were admitted to hospital in England as a result
of unintentional poisonings (Hospital Episode Statistics, 2008).
The chronic effects of chemical exposures on children and
young people are less well understood and quantified in the
UK. However, where links between chronic exposure and health
effects have been established (e.g. lead and neurological
development), effective action has already been taken to
reduce exposure.
5.1.2 Ionising and non-ionising radiation
Exposure to ionising radiation is known to result in an increased
risk of developing cancer. However, studies on the effects of
exposure to natural and other background radiation, such
as the naturally occurring radioactive gas, radon, have not
identified an effect on incidence rates. There may, however, be
a small increased risk which is difficult to measure.
Ultraviolet radiation, the main source of which is the sun, is a
direct cause of skin cancer. The risk of skin cancer is increased
by high childhood exposure to ultraviolet radiation. The
Regional Priority Goal IVReduce the risk of disease and disability arising from exposure to hazardous chemicals (such as heavy metals), physical agents (e.g. excessive noise) and biological agents and to hazardous working environments during pregnancy, childhood and adolescence.
Reduce the proportion of children with birth defects, mental retardation and developmental disorders, and decrease the incidence of melanoma and non‑melanoma skin cancer in later life and other childhood cancers by:
(a) passingandenforcinglegislationandregulationsandimplementingnationalandinternationalconventionsandprogrammesto:•reduceexposureofchildrenandpregnant
womentohazardouschemical,physicalandbiologicalagentstolevelsthatdonotproduceharmfuleffectsonchildren’shealth,
•protectchildrenfromexposuretoharmfulnoise(suchasaircraftnoise)athomeandatschool,
•ensureappropriateinformationonand/ortestingforeffectsonthehealthofdevelopingorganismsofchemicals,productsandtechnologiesbeforetheirmarketingandreleaseintotheenvironment,
•ensurethesafecollection,storage,transportation,recovery,disposalanddestructionofnon-hazardousandhazardouswaste,withparticularattentiontotoxicwaste,
•monitorinaharmonisedwaytheexposureofchildren,aswellasmenandwomenofreproductiveage,tohazardouschemical,physicalandbiologicalagents,
•ensurethatinternationalagreementsonthecontrolofchemicalpollutantsandhazardouswasteareapplied,
(b) implementingpoliciestoraiseawarenessandendeavourtoensurereductionofexposuretoultravioletradiation,particularlyinchildrenandadolescents,and
(c) promotingprogrammesincludingthosefortheadequatedisseminationofinformationtothepublicthatwillpreventandminimisetheconsequencesofnaturaldisastersandmajorindustrialandnuclearaccidentsandtakeintoconsiderationtheneedsofchildrenandpeopleofreproductiveage. (WHO, 2004)
5 Chemical, Physical and Biological Agents
3�
incidence of skin cancers amongst 20–24 year olds has risen
substantially in the UK, and is generally higher amongst young
people in Scotland than in England (Figure 5.1).
Evidence to date suggests that, in general, there are no adverse
effects on the health of the population of the UK as a result
of exposure to electromagnetic fields below nationally and
internationally accepted exposure guideline levels. However,
there are a number of epidemiological studies, including
studies from the UK, showing an association between exposure
to power frequency fields at home and/or from living close
to high voltage power lines and a small excess of childhood
leukaemia. At present no plausible biological mechanism
has been identified to explain this excess, if real, and there
is uncertainty about what aspect of electromagnetic field
exposure, if any, might be responsible. With regard to
radiofrequency fields, the widespread development in the
use of mobile phones worldwide has not been accompanied
by associated, clearly established increases in adverse health
effects, including in children.
5.1.3 Noise
Research has shown that exposure to noisy environments at
school can adversely affect children’s learning and educational
attainment. The impact of such exposures at a national level
has not been quantified.
5.1.4 Biological hazards
Exposure to biological hazards from environmental sources
can result in gastrointestinal illness amongst children, a
principal source of which is food poisoning. This highlights
the importance of good understanding of basic food hygiene
measures. Food poisoning cases amongst children have
declined and levelled off in recent years and, in 2006, there
were just over 20,000 cases in children and young people
of food poisoning recorded by microbiology laboratories in
England and Wales. A Food Standards Agency’s study (FSA,
2000) of intestinal infectious disease identified that cases
diagnosed in microbiology laboratories under-represent the
proportion of all cases. Other sources of environmentally
derived gastrointestinal illness include person-to-person contact
and contact with animals.
Figure 5.1 Incidence of malignant melanoma in 20–24 year olds in England and Scotland (ISD Scotland, 2006; ONS, 2006b)
Scotland,females
England,females
Scotland,males
England,males
Rat
ep
er�
00
,00
0p
op
ula
tio
n(3
-yea
rro
llin
ga
vera
ge)
�0
8
6
4
2
0
�982 �985 �990 �995 2000 2005Year
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
32
5.2 Where are we now?
In the UK there is robust legislation and a wide range of
initiatives to protect the public from environmental and
occupational exposure to chemicals, biological hazards
(particularly food safety and hygiene) and ionising (e.g. radon)
and non-ionising radiation (e.g. ultraviolet radiation and
radiofrequency electromagnetic fields). Excessive noise is also
addressed through regulations, which provide local authorities
with powers to deal with and investigate complaints.
5.2.1 Chemicals
Legislation and initiatives aimed at protecting the public from
exposure to chemicals have led to reduced exposures of many
chemicals in children and young people (some examples are
given in Box 5.1). However, there is still much to learn regarding
children’s exposure, the variables that influence exposure and
whether there are any associated health effects. The main
concern is that health effects are often difficult to quantify and
may be as a result of chronic exposures to single chemicals
or mixtures of chemicals, although new and developing
techniques, such as human biomonitoring, are providing
opportunities to improve understanding and evaluate exposure.
Although legislation and safety initiatives have decreased
unintentional poisonings in children in the last 20–30 years,
accidental poisonings remain a significant risk. There is a lack
of understanding of the reasons for many of the unintentional
poisonings amongst children in the UK and of effective
interventions to continue to reduce such incidents.
The EU Regulation on the Registration, Evaluation and
Authorisation of Chemicals, which came into force in June 2007,
is aimed at ensuring a high level of protection of human health
and the environment from chemicals. It replaces 40 existing
legislative instruments combining them into a single, coherent
system. Risk assessments take into account exposures of
vulnerable groups including children (Capleton et al, 2008).
The effects of chemical exposures in utero and early life are
poorly understood and require further research. Whilst the
incidence of environmentally induced congenital abnormalities
(in both live and still birth) is difficult to estimate, there are
well-established links between developmental abnormalities
and the environment (Hens, 2007). Surveillance of congenital
abnormalities is important if we are to understand the true
impact of the environment on human development and
disease. Although there are local reporting mechanisms in
place to register congenital abnormalities at birth, it is not
consistently applied throughout the UK. Evidence suggests
that the incidence of some congenital abnormalities (such as
gastroschisis) is increasing in industrialised countries (Hens,
2007). It is important that we gain a full understanding of the
effect of the environment on pre- and post-natal development
so that suitable interventions can be taken to reduce the
disease burden.
Box5.� Controllingchildren’sexposureto
chemicalstoprotecttheirhealth
Leadposesarisktochildrenasitcanaffectthe
developmentofthenervoussystem.Inthelast
20–30yearslegislationandotheractionshavebeen
putinplacetocontrolleadintheenvironment
andprotectchildren’shealth.Thesehaveincluded
banningleadinpetrol,restrictingtheuseofleaded
paintandtheuseofleadintoys,controllinglead
infoodandcontrollingemissionsofleadfrom
industrialprocesses.Asaresult,therehasbeena
substantialreductioninbloodleadlevelsinchildren,
sothatmedianbloodleadlevelsinthe�990s
(�–3µg/dl)haddeclinedapproximatelyten-fold
comparedwithlevelsinthe�960s(23µg/dl).
Measurestocontrolexposuretopersistentorganic
pollutants(suchaschlorinatedpesticides,dioxins
andpolychlorinatedbiphenyls)havebeenputin
placeoveranumberofyearsandhaveincluded
implementinginternationalandnationallegislation
tocontroltheproduction,use,storageandsources
ofemissionsofthesechemicals.Monitoringof
breastmilkhasshownareductioninlevelsof
persistentorganicpollutantsovertime(byover50%
forsomepollutants).Thishasresultedinadecrease
inexposurestopersistentorganicpollutantsin
breastfedbabies.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
33
An increased demand for building has led to a greater use of
brownfield sites. The Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment
model* used to derive soil guidelines is aimed at protecting
children as the most sensitive group. However, it is important
to ensure that information is communicated effectively
concerning contaminated land to address public anxieties,
particularly in situations such as the building of schools on
previously contaminated land.
5.2.2 Ionising and non-ionising radiation
The carcinogenic risks of ionising radiation are generally
higher for exposures in childhood than for exposures later in
life (HPA, 2005). The principal source of exposure to ionising
radiation for children in the UK is from radon gas in homes,
schools and other childcare settings. The Health Protection
Agency has undertaken detailed mapping of domestic radon
levels throughout the UK, and is responsible for advising the
UK government on appropriate action to reduce exposure for
adults and children.
Evidence suggests that observable raised cancer risks may
occur below the existing UK action level for radon in homes.
A review of the current action level† for radon in homes is
under way, taking into account recent scientific evidence from
the Advisory Group on Ionising Radiation, the Committee on
Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE), the
World Health Organization and the International Commission
on Radiological Protection. Draft advice is likely to be published
for consultation in 2009.
COMARE has written to the government in England and the
devolved administrations (January 2008) alerting them to
three recommendations from its meeting of October 2007.
One is a recommendation to treat schools the same as
homes for radon protection purposes, i.e. to use an action
level of 200 becquerels per cubic metre (Bq/m3) rather than
the occupational level of 400 Bq/m3. The Health Protection
Agency is currently working with the Health and Safety
Executive (HSE) on developing a programme with the aim of
bringing radon exposure levels in schools to well below the
regulatory standard.
Medical exposures to ionising radiation are increasing, as new
diagnostic techniques are adopted. The UK Ionising Radiation
(Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 require that healthcare
staff pay special attention to medical exposures of children and
the foetus in order to justify medical exposures in children and
protect them from unjustified risks.
The UK environment agencies and the Food Standards Agency
operate a comprehensive system for monitoring radioactivity in
food and the environment, the results of which are published
annually (e.g. EA et al, 2007). The Food Standards Agency
is responsible for ensuring that the levels of radioactive
substances in foods are properly controlled to meet relevant UK
and international safety standards.
Non-ionising radiations include ultraviolet radiation and
electromagnetic fields. Although the focus of public anxieties
varies, the principal public health concern is exposure to
ultraviolet radiation, as a direct cause of skin cancer. There have
been a number of public health campaigns and awareness-
raising initiatives in the UK aimed at improving sun protection
knowledge and behaviour in children and young people
(Box 5.2), and the government has made a commitment
to increase funding for awareness programmes (DH, 2007).
However, the effectiveness of these initiatives needs to be
evaluated as a matter of good practice.
There is concern about the use of sunbeds by children and
young people. In England, the Department of Health has
recently announced that it intends to review options for
regulation of the cosmetic tanning industry, taking into account
the scale of use by minors, with a view to ensuring the health
of children and young people is adequately protected (DH,
2007). In Scotland, the Public Health etc (Scotland) Act 2008
includes measures for controls on the use of sunbeds, such as
a ban on operators from allowing the use of sunbeds by under
18 year olds in commercial premises, banning the sale or hire of
sunbeds to the under 18s and banning the use of unsupervised
or coin-operated sunbeds. However, it is important to ensure
that the same level of protection is afforded to children
throughout the UK.
* Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment, http://www.environment-agency.co.uk/.† The action level is the annual radon concentration in a home above which remedial action is recommended to decrease the risk of lung cancer. Currently the action level is 200 becquerels per cubic metre (Bq/m3).
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
34
The widespread use of mobile phones has led to concerns
about possible health effects associated with exposure
to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, particularly in
children. Overall, evidence available suggests that exposure to
radiofrequency fields below established guidelines does not
cause adverse health effects in the general population, but
in view of scientific uncertainties, a precautionary approach
has been recommended for children’s use of mobile phones.
Recently, concern has been expressed about exposures to
radiofrequency fields generated by wireless local area networks
and WiFi, particularly in schools. Current evidence suggests that
exposures are below international guideline levels and therefore
do not pose a health risk to children. However, research is
ongoing to better understand the levels and patterns of
exposure from these technologies.
5.2.3 Noise
Whilst the impact of noise on children’s learning and
educational attainment has been studied, little is known about
other impacts of noise on children’s health and well-being.
Current specifications for the acoustic design of schools set
standards for sound insulation for new and refurbished schools,
including standards for sound insulation of teaching areas.
Currently, in accordance with the EU Noise Directive, noise
maps are being prepared throughout the UK for major roads,
railways and cities and may assist in identifying those affected,
including schools, by excessive background noise (Capleton
et al, 2008).
Box5.2 Examplesofinitiativesandcampaignsforprotectingchildrenfromthesun
Thereareanumberofinitiativesandcampaignsaimedatdevelopinggreaterawarenessoftherisksofskincancer
and promoting good sun protection behaviour, which are specifically focused on children.
TheSunSmart initiative,commissionedbytheUKHealthDepartmentsandrunbyCancerResearchUK,hasan
ongoingschoolsprogrammethatprovidessunprotectionguidelinestoschools,andencouragesschoolstodevelop
theirownsunprotectionpoliciesandincorporatesunprotectioneducationintothecurriculum.
Beat the Burn –theCharteredInstituteofEnvironmentalHealthworkedwithsevenWelshlocalauthoritiesin2004
tosupportaseriesofskincancerawarenesscampaignstopromotetheSunSmartcode,targetingyoungpeople
andparents.Activitiesincluded:posterswithsunprotectionadvicenearbeachesinAnglesey;aseriesofeventsin
Wrexham including a National Play Day attended by over 500 children; and Merthyr Tydfil Pink Nose Day, which
involved�3schoolsandencouragedchildrentoapplypinksunscreenontheirnosefortheday.
NHS Fife and NHS Tayside Keep Yer Shirt on Projectwasruntoraiseawarenessoftheimportanceofskincancer
preventionandreducetheriskofsunburninpre-schoolchildren.Theprojectincluded:workshopsfornursery
staffandothercarersofchildren;workingwithparentsofpreschoolchildren;encouragingpre-schoolchildcare
establishmentstodevelopandimplementsunawarenesspolicies;andprovidingshadestructuresinnurseriesand
playgroups.
AspartofNorthernIreland’sCare in the Sunprogramme,aLivingWillowsforShadeprojecthasbeenundertaken
wherebysuchstructuresarebuiltinschoolplaygroundstoprovideshadeforpupils.Aspartoftheprogramme,
eachschoolisrequiredtodevelopaCareintheSunpolicybasedonDepartmentforEducation(NorthernIreland)
guidelinesandfacilitatethedesignandbuildingofwillowshadestructures.TheschemewasfundedbytheBig
LotteryFundandenabled48schoolstohavelivingwillowshadestructures.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
35
Recently concerns have been raised about the use of high
frequency audio devices (e.g. ‘Mosquito’ devices) used to deter
anti-social behaviour and loitering and the effect on children’s
and young people’s health and well-being. An HSE evaluation
of such devices concluded that there would appear to be little
likelihood of long-term ill health; however, the impact on well-
being still remains unclear.
There is also concern about the use of personal music players
by children and young people and the long-term effects
on hearing. The Royal National Institute for Deaf People’s
‘Don’t Lose the Music’* campaign aims to increase public
awareness about sound and hearing damage. The European
Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified
Health Risks recently evaluated such devices and concluded
that hearing damage may occur if prolonged use occurs at
excessive volumes and recommended that further research
be undertaken as to how such music players are used and
factors that make individuals susceptible to hearing loss
(SCENIHR, 2008).
5.2.4 Biological hazards
Disease surveillance is an important tool to understand
the effects of biological hazards on health and highlights
patterns of disease within populations. Problems with disease
surveillance systems include under-reporting of infections and
low rates of microbiological testing, which can lead to bias
towards detecting more severe cases and cases in high risk
groups such as infants.
The Food Standards Agency strategic plan for 2005–2010 aims
to reduce food-borne disease in the general population by
promoting awareness about food hygiene, focusing particularly
on schools. To support this strategy there are a number of
initiatives throughout the UK (e.g. Cooking Bus, Spud’s Zone
and the Elementary Food Hygiene Training) that promote food
hygiene messages to children.
5.2.5 Emergency preparedness
Proper and effective planning and preparation for emergencies
(natural, industrial and deliberate) is critical to minimise the
consequences of such events and to ensure an effective
response. It is important to take into account the needs of
vulnerable groups, such as children, who may have specific
needs. In the UK, the NHS emergency planning guidelines
(DH, 2005) refer to the needs of vulnerable groups, including
children, and recommend that specific plans should be
developed for schools, nurseries, childcare centres and medical
facilities for children. More detailed guidelines for the NHS,
that address the needs of children in emergency situations,
are being developed, and children have been involved in some
emergency planning exercises to gain a better understanding
of their needs (e.g. Exercise Young Neptune – see Box 5.3).
Other emergency planning guidance also considers the needs
of children. For example, guidance on heat waves refers to
the vulnerability of babies and young children (DH, 2008b),
and guidelines for sampling after a chemical incident refer to
the need to consider ‘sensitive sites’ such as schools, crèches,
and playgrounds where many children may be together
(DETR, 1999).
* Don’t Lose the Music, http://www.dontlosethemusic.com.
Box5.3 ExerciseYoungNeptune
–managingchildreninmajor
incidents
ExerciseYoungNeptunewasheldinDecember2006
totesttheproceduresformassdecontaminationof
childrenandtheirbehaviouralandpsychological
impact.TheHealthProtectionAgency,UKFire
andRescueNewDimensionProgramme,UKNHS
AmbulanceServiceandPoliceChemical,Biological,
RadiologicalandNuclearteamsparticipatedinthe
exercise. Sixty-five children, aged between 6 and
�4yearsold,wererecruited.Aftertheexercise,the
participatingchildrengavefeedbackbycompleting
questionnairesandinsmallgroupdiscussions.This
information,togetherwiththeformalexercise
evaluation,willhelpemergencyrespondersto
reviewoperationalprocedures(Turneretal,2007).
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
36
However, there may still be scope to give greater consideration
to the needs of children and young people, e.g. by ensuring
children are routinely considered in emergency planning
exercises, where appropriate, ensuring that their needs are
prioritised, and by ensuring measures deployed during an
emergency (e.g. decontamination clothing and antidotes)
have been thoroughly evaluated for use by children and
young people.
5.3 Areas for improvement
Generally, children and young people’s health is well protected
from chemical, physical and biological hazards. However, there
are some areas that may benefit from further action. These
areas are listed below.
5.3.1 Chemicals
Ways to further reduce the number of deaths and hospital
admissions of children from accidental poisoning need to be
identified. A better understanding of the current trends and
patterns of poisonings would help identify interventions and
areas that would benefit from further research.
There is still much to learn about children’s exposure to single
chemicals and chemical mixtures in the UK, including a better
understanding about where children are exposed (e.g. in the
home, schools and outdoor environment). Research to fill
these gaps should include the use of new techniques such
as biomonitoring. The UK should develop a robust human
biomonitoring programme to monitor exposures and evaluate
interventions (e.g. legislation) to reduce exposure (e.g.
Box 5.1). Such studies should be representative of children in
the UK and consider exposures to chemical mixtures as well as
single chemicals.
Further research is required into better understanding
the health effects of chemical exposures and particularly
understanding harm during embryonic development, a greater
understanding of the transgenerational effects of in utero chemical exposure as well as neurological developmental
toxicology and other lifelong effects potentially resulting from
exposures early in life.
A strategic review of systems for surveillance of congenital
abnormalities would be timely with a view to making
recommendations to improve upon the current surveillance
systems in the UK.
5.3.2 Ionising and non-ionising radiation
Householders in radon affected areas should continue to be
encouraged to participate in radon testing and to reduce radon
levels in houses which are above the action level. Whilst there
have been several campaigns, the proportion of householders
installing remedial measures to reduce radon in homes is still
relatively low. Encouraging householders to consider radon
mitigation should continue.
Landlords and employers in radon affected areas should be
encouraged to participate in radon testing and to reduce levels
in buildings which are above the action level. In particular, all
schools and childcare settings in radon affected areas should
be tested for radon and, if above the action level, should take
measures to reduce the exposure of pupils and staff.
COMARE has recommended that schools should be treated
the same as homes for the purposes of radon protection.
This would mean that the current radon action level for
homes of 200 Bq/m3 should be applied to schools and other
childcare environments.
Good sun protection behaviour should be encouraged in
children and young people. Campaigns across the UK should be
coordinated and evaluated. It is important to ensure that sun
protection behaviour and knowledge is taught consistently to a
high standard across the UK. Schools and childcare institutions
should continue to develop and implement sun protection
policies that are known to be effective, such as including shade
in play areas.
The use of sunbeds and tanning parlours by children and young
people should be prevented or reduced and means to do
Young people consider that Chemicals in beauty products and pesticides in the food chain, waste reduction, recycling, healthy eating and the risk of radon in schools (especially primary schools) are areas of concern.
37
this need to be explored further and implemented across the
UK. Measures could include restricting the use of commercial
sunbeds and tanning parlours to those over a specified age
(e.g. 18 years) and ensuring that information about health risks
is provided with retail sunbeds.
Further research is needed to improve the understanding of
possible health effects of electromagnetic field exposures
(e.g. from mobile phones, base stations, electrical wiring
and appliances and overhead power lines) in children, young
people, pregnant women and foetuses. A comprehensive
understanding of exposures in the UK is important to be able to
interpret results of national and international studies and give
better health advice.
5.3.3 Noise
Children and young people are affected by noise and their
education can suffer directly. Noise maps, which are currently
being produced for major roads, railways and cities, could
be used to identify schools likely to be affected by noise and
identify where noise interventions may be most useful.
Further research is needed to improve understanding of the
non-auditory effects of background noise, high frequency noise
devices and personal music players on children and young
people. Further investigation is also needed as to how personal
music players are used and the impact on the hearing of
children and young people.
5.3.4 Biological hazards
Schools should continue to teach and encourage food hygiene
to establish good habits at an early age. The surveillance
system for food-borne diseases is an important way to identify
health effects of biological hazards; however, this could
be strengthened.
5.3.5 Emergency preparedness
Children and young people should be routinely considered
and, where appropriate, included in emergency preparedness
exercises in order to understand and take better account of
their needs. Specific consideration should be given to the
needs of children and young people, by ensuring, for example,
antidotes and equipment such as decontamination clothing
are suitable for use by children and young people of all ages,
and that their needs are prioritised in relevant emergency
situations (e.g. access to sanitation and clean water following a
flooding incident).
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
38
6.1 Overview
The involvement of young people is an important element
of the Children’s Environment and Health Strategy in the UK.
Various youth groups have been engaged internationally and
within the UK from an early stage to identify the issues they
consider most important and to assess their understanding
and awareness about the effects of the environment on
their health.
6.2 Youth consultation process
Thirty official youth delegates from across the WHO
European Region attended the WHO Ministerial Conference
on Environment and Health in 2004 when the Children’s
Environment and Health Action Plan for Europe (CEHAPE) was
launched (WHO, 2004). During this meeting, they held a Youth
Parliament at which a Youth Declaration* was developed,
expressing their views on CEHAPE and highlighting food
security, safety and quality, access to clean water, air pollution
and green spaces, waste, tobacco and alcohol, and education
as priority areas.
The involvement of young people has continued throughout
the process. In the UK young people have been consulted
through a number of ways including workshops, discussions
and questionnaires in a number of settings (mainly schools
and the UK Youth Parliament), covering different age groups
(from 11–18 years), sexes and geographical locations. The views
of young people on the impact of the environment on their
health are presented below.
6.3 What is important to young people?
A number of workshops held with the UK Youth Parliament
and a Youth Partnership Group highlighted the fact that young
people do not naturally make a link between their health and
the environment. However, once this connection is identified,
young people show an advanced understanding of health, the
environment and how these impact on each other.
The top five health issues that they consider important are (in
descending order): mental health; obesity and healthy eating;
lung cancer, asthma and allergies (pollution related); sexual
health; and drug use. Mental health was one of the key health
concerns for young people, who agreed that they “want to
be happy”.
Young people identified general good health as being
vibrant, alive, full of energy and “having one’s life on
track”, whilst physical health was not being obese, moving
around easily and being active. This was linked to exercise,
healthy eating, drinking water, avoiding too many sweets,
not smoking or drinking too much alcohol, fresh air and
a clean home environment. They considered that the
government, local authorities, the National Health Service and
individuals all have a responsibility in ensuring good health in
young people.
With respect to the impact that the environment (in its
broadest sense) can have on health, young people generally
think that it is important to consider social issues and
environmental concerns together, including the social
environment (such as peer pressure), the green environment
(e.g. parks and open spaces) and the close association that
food, nutrition and exercise have with the environment. The
social environment was also linked to health (e.g. drug abuse
leading to poor mental health or open green environments
with space for outdoor activities resulting in vibrant and
energetic children).
When asked to list what they consider as good and bad health,
they identified the environmental factors that they associated
with these. These are presented in Figure 6.1.* WHO (2004): Fourth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health, Youth Declaration, http://www.euro.who.int/document/e83350.pdf.
6 Youth Participation
39
Figure 6.1 Young people’s ideas of good and bad health and associated environmental factors
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
40
During 2004 the WHO initiated an internet project called
‘Young Minds’*. Pupils in the UK involved in this project
considered that young people generally feel poorly informed
and worried, and want to learn more about the environment
and its impact on their health, but that they do not trust what
they are told by the media or the government. They identified
TV and the internet as the best sources of information and
want to be better informed so that they can take responsibility
and make their own decisions relating to the environment and
its impact on their health.
In response to a questionnaire survey in 2007 the majority
(83%) of UK Youth Parliament respondents thought that
the environment impacted on their health. Cheaper leisure
facilities and clean green spaces were generally viewed as the
main areas for improvement. They also prioritised what they
considered the most important environmental issues as follows
(in descending order): nutrition (47%), immediate environment
(home, school, leisure place; 30%), air pollution (18%) and
exposure to chemicals (2%). Other things identified as being
important included global warming, safety, education, and
drugs and alcohol. Healthier eating and more (free) sports
facilities, together with improved education for both young
people and parents on diet, food, mental health and being
healthy, and improving health services, were also considered
priorities for action.
During 2007, the Northern Ireland Commissioner for Children
and Young People met and obtained the views from over
2000 children and young people across Northern Ireland.
Amongst their top priorities were play and things to do and
protection (which included road safety and bullying).
The Children’s Commissioner for Wales led a number of events
in 2008 that involved 400 children and young people (aged
7–18 years old). From these a number of ideas were suggested
to improve the environment, including greater recycling, less
crime, more trees, less pollution, banning smoking and limiting
alcohol intake.
6.4 Young people’s views on the Children’s Environment and Health Strategy
The following sections highlight responses received through a
questionnaire sent to the UK Youth Parliament that relate to the
individual Regional Priority Goal areas.
6.4.1 Water, sanitation and health
Access to safe, clean toilet facilities and to clean drinking water
in schools, hygiene and hand washing were considered a high
priority. Young people also identified that toilets attracted
bullies and smokers. Several young people said that they would
avoid drinking in the day so that they would not need to use
toilet facilities.
6.4.2 Accidents, injuries, obesity and physical activity
Improved and affordable leisure and exercise facilities, green
space (more trees and less concrete), less litter and healthier
eating were highlighted as areas for improvement.
Most children and young people identified outdoor exercise
and play as most important as it has the biggest effect on
their health, especially in relation to their mental health and
happiness; access to safe, clean and green open spaces for play
and exercise was also considered a priority. Gangs, knife crime,
accidents and computer games were considered to be barriers
to playing outdoors. Parental concerns were also mentioned as
often preventing children from playing outside.
Healthy eating was identified as important and linked to
preventing obesity as was access to space and play. Young
people linked obesity to fast food, lack of exercise and laziness.
Suggestions proposed to improve healthy eating included
better food labelling, better (and free) school dinners, limits
on pesticides, more organic foods, more variety in local shops,
government regulations on (battery) farming and changing
attitudes. In particular, improving school food and educating * Young minds – exploring links between culture, health and environment, http://www.young-minds.net/ym/top/index.php.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
4�
both students and parents about healthy eating were seen as
areas for attention.
6.4.3 Respiratory health, indoor and outdoor air pollution
Young people recognised air pollution as something that
directly affected health and there was support for clean fresh
air and green unpolluted spaces. Improved and cheaper public
transport was highlighted as a way of reducing car pollution.
There was overwhelming support for further restrictions on
smoking, including a complete ban. Although smoking is
prohibited in indoor public spaces, young people feel that they
now encounter more smoke from people driven to smoking on
the street.
6.4.4 Chemical, physical and biological agents
Exposure to chemicals was not generally considered an issue
that has an impact on young people in the UK. Those concerns
raised were about chemicals in beauty products and pesticides
in the food chain. Waste reduction, recycling and risk of
radon exposure in schools (especially primary schools) were
also highlighted.
6.5 Conclusions
Young people’s understanding of the relationship between the
environment and their health is not intrinsic; however, upon
development of the ideas through discussion sessions, they are
quick to provide examples of where they think the environment
affects their well-being. Children and young people have
strong feelings about the importance of good health and,
although the relationship is complex, they understand that
their behaviour and environment impact upon their well-being.
Engaging children and young people should be integral when
implementing recommendations from the Strategy so that they
are adopted into youth culture.
Young people have strong views about which aspects of the
Strategy are most important to them. The key areas they
identified during this youth consultation fell into two different
groupings, those related to Regional Priority Goal areas:
• better toilets and hygiene in schools,
• improved access to clean drinking water in schools,
• healthier eating and reduced obesity,
• affordable and improved facilities for physical exercise,
• more clean green spaces,
• improved transport (cleaner and fewer cars),
• less pollution,
• ban smoking,
• chemicals in beauty products and pesticides in the
food chain,
• waste reduction, recycling, healthy eating and radon in
schools (especially primary schools),
and those related to overarching issues:
• improvements in mental health,
• better education and information for young people
and parents regarding health and the environment,
• peer pressure and current attitudes can be barriers to
maintaining a healthy lifestyle.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
42
A number of overarching issues are common to more than one
Regional Priority Goal area. These are discussed below.
7.1 Inequalities
In the UK there is an uneven distribution of exposure to
environmental hazards amongst children according to
socioeconomic group and region. There is increasing
evidence that environmental inequalities are a real problem
which affect all the Regional Priority Goal areas. For example,
inequalities in children’s health exist in mortality and
morbidity from unintentional injuries (including poisonings),
obesity and physical activity (HPA, 2007a) and exposure to
environmental pollution (HPA, 2005). However, the causes,
effects and distribution are varied and complex. Therefore,
health inequalities should be a major consideration in taking
the Strategy forward, linking with other strategies aimed
at addressing health inequalities, such as Tackling Health
Inequalities: Programme for Action (DH, 2003). Specifically,
groups that may need to be considered, in addition to those
already highlighted, are:
• those living in the most deprived communities in
the UK,
• children and young people with disabilities or long-
term medical conditions (e.g. asthma),
• gypsy and traveller children.
7.2 Settings
As children and young people spend most of their time either
at home, in educational establishments or outdoors, focusing
on improving the environment in these locations may be
of more benefit than looking at environmental risk factors
individually. It may also enable a more holistic approach to
be taken to reducing the burden of disease associated with
environmental risk factors and improving children’s health
and well-being.
7.2.1 Homes
Children spend a substantial part of their lives in the home
environment, particularly before the age of five years; therefore
this is a key area where the environment impacts on the health
of children. Safety in the home is an important aspect: for
example, in 2004 over 60% of hospital accident and emergency
admissions for children under the age of five years in Wales were
due to unintentional injuries that occurred within the home
(Figure 3.2). There is legislation regulating some aspects of
the home environment (e.g. building regulations and housing
health and safety regulations). However, effective change
requires the participation and motivation of householders.
Environmental hazards in the home environment of importance
to children include lead in drinking water, injury and poisoning
risks, environmental tobacco smoke, radon and food hygiene. It
is important that children are accommodated in decent housing
that is not over-crowded.
There is evidence that changes in eating habits and physical
activity are more likely to be maintained when the behaviour
of the whole family is changed. Therefore, where appropriate,
interventions should be targeted at the whole family.
7.2.2 Community settings
The wider social and community environment can also have an
important impact on well-being, e.g. opportunities for young
people, amenities and transport. The 2004/05 survey of English
housing undertaken by the Department for Communities and
Local Government identified that householders felt that the
most important area for improvement was ‘opportunities and
facilities for children and young people’ (DCLG, 2006b). The
government has established several public service agreements
and a Sustainable Communities Plan (ODPM, 2003) that aim
to build stronger, more sustainable communities and a better
quality of life. The public service agreements include ones
to halve the number of children in poverty by 2010/11, build
more cohesive, empowered and active communities, and make
communities safer (HM Government, 2007a,b,c).
This is also being taken forward in the Children’s Plan (DCSF,
2007), which emphasises the need for strengthened support
for parents and families. For example, the Plan highlights the
continued development of the SureStart Children’s Centres to
7 Overarching Issues and Priorities
43
provide drop-in centres for parents and outreach services, and
provide advice and information on areas of concern for parents
and children. It is also taking forward the development of safe
places to play outdoors as one of its key areas.
7.2.3 Schools, nurseries and other childcare settings
In the UK primary school children spend approximately
6.5 hours a day in the school environment for 190 days a year.
Secondary school children, and those involved in extracurricular
activities, spend up to 8 hours a day in school. The school
environment is subject to considerable regulation, but may
still lend itself to further improvement. Many of the concerns
relate to the location and age of schools. In England, the
Building Schools for the Future programme aims to refurbish or
renew every secondary school. This will help to ensure a more
consistent approach to a range of environmental health issues
in schools. In particular, there are now standard specifications
for school toilets and the acoustic design of schools, and
building guidance and regulations help ensure environmental
health issues are taken into account when building new schools
or renovating existing facilities.
Nurseries are important for pre-school age children and their
parents and by 2010 all three and four year olds will be offered
15 hours of free nursery education per week. Preschool and
primary years are important for the foundation of children’s
knowledge, understanding and skills relating to healthy
lifestyles, food nutrition and health. Many lifelong dietary habits
are established before the age of ten. The National Institute
for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines for physical
activity and the environment (NICE, 2008) highlight the role of
nurseries and other childcare facilities in minimising sedentary
activities and implementing actions to reduce obesity.
The Healthy Schools* programme in England and the Health
Promoting Schools† initiative in Scotland (which takes a whole-
school approach) are both important for ensuring children have
a healthy environment at school.
7.3 Sustainable development
Sustainable development and wider environmental planning
are important ways of linking many of the recommendations
made within the Strategy.
The UK Sustainable Development Strategy aims to enable
all people satisfy their own basic needs and enjoy a better
quality of life without compromising the quality of life of
Box7.� Sustainabletransportandthe
journeytoschool
TheWalking Bus picksupchildrenatsetpoints
alongaroutetoschoolandthechildrenwalkin
pairswithanadult‘driver’atthefrontandadult
‘conductor’attherear.Therouteisselectedtoavoid
busyroadswherepossibleand,alongwithreducing
traffic around the school, can reduce children’s
exposuretoairpollution.
Park and Strideschemesencourageparentswho
normallydrivetheirchildrentoschooltopark
furtherawayfromtheschoolandwalktheirchildren
the final part of the journey to reduce traffic around
theschoolgates.Thismay,inturn,reducethe
amount of traffic-generated air pollution to which
childrenareexposed.
InScotland,SchoolTravelCoordinatorsworkwith
schoolsintheirareastodevelopandimplement
travelplans.SUSTRANS,thesustainabletransport
charity,providesgrantstoschoolsforcapitaland
resourceprojects,includingfundingforcycle
storagefacilities,lockers,improvedpathsand
walkwaysandsupportmaterialsforwalkingbuses
andothersimilarinitiatives.
InNorthernIreland,Travelwise NIisaroads
serviceinitiativedesignedtoencouragetheuseof
sustainabletransportoptions.Itswebsiteprovides
informationforparentsongettingtheirchildrento
schoolbycycling,walkingbusesorcarsharing.* Healthy Schools, http://www.healthyschools.gov.uk/.† Health Promoting Schools, http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/healthpromotingschools/.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
44
future generations (HM Government, 2005). Sustainable
development has important implications for children’s and
young people’s health and well-being. For example, promoting
more sustainable modes of transport can lead to more
walking, cycling and use of public transport by children and
young people, which in turn can reduce traffic-generated
pollution and noise levels, increase physical activity of children
and young people, enable them to develop a greater sense
of independence and have positive impacts on obesity. The
Education and Inspections Act 2006 places a general duty
on all local authorities in England to assess the school travel
needs of all pupils in their area and to promote the use of
safe and sustainable modes of travel. Some examples of
sustainable transport initiatives are presented in Box 7.1. Whilst
the Sustainable Development Strategy focuses on the whole
population, it is important that the benefits to children’s health
and well-being are taken into account when considering
sustainability issues.
It is important to involve the public and stakeholders in
developing a vision for green space, and planning decisions
more generally (including the planning of schools), to ensure
they meet the needs of the community.
7.4 Mental health
Mental health is a key concern of children and young people
and many aspects of the environment can influence children’s
and young people’s mental health and well-being (e.g.
access to green spaces and play facilities, noise and lead). The
importance of mental health is also highlighted by the fact that
one in ten children between the ages of 0 and 15 years of age
in the UK has a clinically identifiable mental health problem
(Green et al, 2005). Therefore the impact of environmental
factors on children’s and young people’s mental health needs
to be recognised and better understood in order that they can
be effectively managed.
7.5 Horizon scanning – climate change and new technologies
A number of emerging environment and health issues may
impact on children’s health. Climate change could affect a
number of the areas highlighted in the Regional Priority Goals.
Examples include increased food-borne diseases caused by
warmer summers, changes in drinking water quality caused
by flooding and increased intense rainfall events leading to
an increased numbers of bacteria in surface waters, increased
water temperatures and a decrease in the efficiency of removal
of microbes from drinking water (DH and HPA, 2007). Skin
cancers may also rise due to increased exposure to sunlight
and ground level ozone concentrations are likely to increase,
which may lead to an increase in respiratory illness in sensitive
individuals (DH and HPA, 2007).
There are also new technologies for which the potential health
impact on the general population and, in particular, children is
poorly understood. Examples include personal care products
that are increasingly making use of nanotechnology and
wireless computing networks commonly found in schools and
homes. New technologies should be assessed for their potential
health impacts during childhood and later on in life.
7.6 Monitoring and evaluation
In the UK a considerable amount of information is routinely
collected that is relevant to environment and health issues for
children and young people. Although routine surveillance of
infections and waterborne diseases has taken place for some
time, evidence suggests that this could be strengthened.
There is also routine surveillance of road traffic injuries and
obesity levels. However, there is a lack of good quality and
robust information and analysis about chemical exposures,
unintentional poisonings and injuries, and their causes and
impact on children’s health and well-being, particularly the
long-term and cumulative effects.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
45
The findings of routine health surveillance can help to inform
the development of effective public health actions to prevent
acute and chronic health consequences of environmental
hazards. These data can be used to evaluate the effectiveness
of specific interventions in terms of a reduction in the burden of
disease in the targeted population.
Whilst there are many initiatives aimed at improving children’s
environmental health, only a small number appear to have
been thoroughly evaluated with regard to their benefit to
children (e.g. Kerbcraft). Evaluation should be an essential
component of any public health intervention and needs to
be built into any interventions taken forward as a result of
this Strategy. Outcome measures may be short-term health
improvements (e.g. reducing injury rates), or longer-term
positive health effects (e.g. reducing skin cancer rates).
Monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of current
initiatives and policies will help provide information to guide
future policy development and actions.
Part of monitoring and evaluating the impact of the Children’s
Environment and Health Action Plan for Europe (CEHAPE)
may include the use of environment and health indicators
as promulgated by the WHO (Pond et al, 2007). The use
of indicators provides information on the current state of a
particular issue (e.g. obesity or air pollution) and can be used
to identify changes over time and evaluate the impact of
particular policies.
In support of the commitments made under CEHAPE,
the Health Protection Agency has taken forward the
development of a core set of children’s environment and
health indicators. The aim of the indicators is to describe the
burden and distribution of hazards, childhood disease and
injury attributable to environmental risks within the region
concerned and to provide intelligence to inform interventions,
particularly in terms of reducing inequalities. The indicators
were piloted in the West Midlands and a final report will be
produced later in 2009.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
46
8.1 Regional Priority Goal I
8.1.1 Lead in drinking water
A review of means of further reducing exposure to lead
amongst children in the UK should be undertaken, taking into
account the relative costs and benefits to children’s health.
There should be a coordinated programme to investigate the
levels of lead in drinking water in homes and schools (especially
in primary schools) and other childcare settings where levels
may be likely to go above the new standard (10 µg/l).
8.1.2 Private water supplies
Means should be developed to ensure that all private drinking
water supplies are properly documented, that there is an
adequate legislative basis and that compliance with the
standards is high. Further research into and surveillance of the
health impacts of contaminated private water supplies would
also be beneficial.
8.1.3 Water and sanitation in schools and childcare settings
Continued encouragement and support should be given to
initiatives to improve sanitary provision, drinking water provision
and hygiene standards in all childcare settings (e.g. standards
for school toilets and hand-washing initiatives), with the aim
of ensuring a consistent high standard of sanitation facilities,
access to drinking water and hand-washing behaviour in all
schools and childcare settings.
8.1.4 Bathing and recreational waters
There is currently a paucity of evidence on the health effects
of use of outdoor bathing and recreational waters in children
and consideration could be given to addressing this gap. Also,
further research on the use by children of recreational waters
other than beaches could help identify areas for future action.
Investigation of cryptosporidium outbreaks attributed to
swimming pools should be continued to identify common
factors so that interventions, such as water treatment regimes,
can be developed further to prevent future outbreaks.
8.1.5 Water poverty
Measures should be taken to evaluate the number of
households at risk from water poverty and how this may affect
children’s health and well-being, with a view to ensuring that
children and families have access to all the wholesome water
they reasonably need.
8.2 Regional Priority Goal II
8.2.1 Unintentional injuries
Unintentional injuries should be given the same high priority
throughout the UK to ensure high levels of safety regardless
of where children live. There is a need for a more coordinated
approach to injury prevention. It is also important that a
proportionate approach is taken towards health and safety
and injury reduction to ensure children’s opportunities to
experience risk and participate in physical activity are not
adversely restricted. Improved risk and safety education and
awareness are also required.
Accurate surveillance of unintentional injuries, at local and
national level, is essential to enable evaluation of initiatives to
reduce unintentional deaths and injuries amongst children and
young people.
8.2.2 Obesity and physical activity
It is essential that systems are in place to monitor and evaluate
the success of strategies to reverse the increasing numbers
of overweight and obese children and young people and to
continue to encourage changes in lifestyle and behaviour to
achieve appropriate levels of physical activity. It is important
that initiatives are taken forward throughout the UK to ensure
8 Summary of Recommendations
47
obesity levels are monitored consistently. Similar initiatives are
also required to monitor changes in physical activity levels.
8.2.3 Access to green spaces
A strategic approach is required to ensure all children and
young people have easy access to safe and well-maintained
green, open spaces that are in easy reach of their homes
so they can take full advantage of the benefits that green,
open spaces can provide. There should be improved planning
guidance and wider involvement of a range of stakeholders
(including children) in planning and developing green spaces
to ensure that they meet the needs of children and the
wider community.
8.3 Regional Priority Goal III
8.3.1 Indoor air pollution
Provision of a coordinated policy approach, action plan and
improving public information on indoor air quality would be
beneficial. There may also be benefits in preparing an action
plan to address indoor air quality. In particular, more work may
be needed to increase public awareness of the risks associated
with carbon monoxide exposure and the importance of
properly maintained fossil-fuelled appliances.
Further research to quantify the incidence and impact of
chronic carbon monoxide poisoning may be beneficial.
This should consider whether children are more severely
affected than adults and, if necessary, identify ways to prevent
such exposures.
Continued efforts should be made to educate adults as to the
effects of smoking on children’s health and encourage them
to continue to minimise children’s exposure. As socioeconomic
status is one of the primary determinants of children’s exposure
to environmental tobacco smoke, it is important to focus
efforts towards the most vulnerable groups.
8.3.2 Outdoor air pollution
Guidance on local air quality action plans should be extended
to include measures which can be taken to reduce the
exposure of susceptible groups, including children. Action plans
developed by local authorities could prioritise more susceptible
groups, including children, within the general population, and
guidance could be provided on what actions are practical
and effective.
Evidence on the health effects linked to proximity to major
roads and traffic is increasing and may have implications
beyond childhood into adult life. There is a need to improve
understanding in this area and this requires a review of the
available literature and evidence in order to determine the best
course of action.
8.4 Regional Priority Goal IV
8.4.1 Chemicals
Ways to further reduce the number of deaths and hospital
admissions of children from accidental poisoning need to be
identified. A better understanding of the current trends and
patterns of poisonings would help identify interventions and
areas that would benefit from further research.
There is still much to learn about children’s exposure to single
chemicals and chemical mixtures in the UK, including a better
understanding about where children are exposed (e.g. in the
home, schools and outdoor environment). The UK should
develop a robust human biomonitoring programme to monitor
exposures and evaluate interventions (e.g. legislation) to
reduce exposure.
Further research is required to improve understanding of
the health effects of chemical exposures and, particularly,
understanding harm during embryonic development, a greater
understanding of the transgenerational effects of in utero
chemical exposure as well as neurological developmental
toxicology and other lifelong effects potentially resulting from
exposures early in life.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
48
A strategic review of systems for surveillance of congenital
abnormalities would be timely with a view to making
recommendations to improve upon the current surveillance
systems in the UK.
8.4.2 Ionising and non-ionising radiation
Householders in radon affected areas should continue to be
encouraged to participate in radon testing and to reduce radon
levels in houses which are above the action level. Whilst there
have been several campaigns, the proportion of householders
installing remedial measures to reduce radon in homes is still
relatively low. Encouraging householders to consider radon
mitigation should continue.
Landlords and employers in radon affected areas should be
encouraged to participate in radon testing and to reduce levels
in buildings which are above the action level. In particular, all
schools and childcare settings in radon affected areas should
be tested for radon and, if above the action level, should take
measures to reduce the exposure of pupils and staff.
COMARE has recommended that schools should be treated
the same as homes for the purposes of radon protection.
This would mean that the current radon action level in
homes of 200 Bq/m3 should be applied to schools and other
childcare environments.
Good sun protection behaviour should be encouraged in
children and young people. Campaigns across the UK should be
coordinated and evaluated.
The use of sunbeds and tanning parlours by children and young
people should be prevented or reduced and means to do
this need to be explored further and implemented across the
UK. Measures could include restricting the use of commercial
sunbeds and tanning parlours to those over a specified age
(e.g. 18 years) and ensuring that information about health risks
is provided with retail sunbeds.
Further research is needed to improve the understanding of
possible health effects of electromagnetic field exposures
(e.g. from mobile phones, base stations, electrical wiring
and appliances, and overhead power lines) in children, young
people, pregnant women and foetuses.
8.4.3 Noise
Children and young people are affected by noise and their
education can suffer directly. Noise maps, which are currently
being produced for major roads, railways and cities, could
be used to identify schools likely to be affected by noise and
identify where noise interventions may be most useful.
Further research is needed as to improve understanding of the
non-auditory effects of background noise, high frequency noise
devices and personal music players on children and young
people. Further investigation is also needed as to how personal
music players are used and their impact on the hearing of
children and young people.
8.4.4 Biological hazards
Schools should continue to teach and encourage food hygiene
to establish good habits at an early age. The surveillance
system for food-borne diseases is an important way to identify
health effects of biological hazards; however, this could
be strengthened.
8.4.5 Emergency preparedness
Children and young people should be routinely considered
and, where appropriate, included in emergency preparedness
exercises in order to understand and take better account of
their needs.
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
49
50
AkhtarPC,CurrieDB,CurrieCEandHawSJ(2007).Changesinchildexposuretoenvironmentaltobaccosmoke(CHETS)studyafterimplementationofsmoke-freelegislationinScotland:nationalcrosssectionalsurvey.BMJ,335, 545–549
AndersonRH,GuptaR,StrachanDPandLimbES(2007).50yearsofasthma:UKtrendsfrom�955to2004.Thorax,62, 85–90
AllWalesInjurySurveillanceSystem(2006).AllWalesAccidentandEmergency(A&E)AttendanceAnalysis2004.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.capic.org.uk/
AuditCommissionandHealthcareCommission(2007).BetterSafeThanSorry.PreventingUnintentionalInjuryofChildren.London,AuditCommission
Cabinet Office (2005). CodeofPracticeonConsultation.London, Cabinet Office. Accessed October 2007 at http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/
CapletonACandDuarte-DavidsonR(2007).DevelopmentofaUKChildren’sEnvironmentandHealthStrategy.RegionalPriorityGoalI:Water,SanitationandHealth.AccessedSeptember2007athttp://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape/
CapletonAC,WykeSM,O’ConnellSEandDuarte-DavidsonR(2008).DevelopmentofaUKChildren’sEnvironmentandHealthStrategy.RegionalPriorityGoalIV:Chemical,PhysicalandBiologicalHazards.AccessedSeptember2007athttp://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape/
CEC(2003).AEuropeanEnvironmentandHealthStrategy.AccessedMarch2009athttp://eurlex.europa.eu/
DCLG(2006a).WhatisaDecentHome?London,DepartmentforCommunitiesandLocalGovernment.AccessedNovember2006athttp://www.communities.gov.uk/
DCLG(2006b).HousinginEngland2004/05.AReportPrincipallyfromthe2004/05SurveyofEnglishHousing.London,DepartmentforCommunitiesandLocalGovernment.AccessedNovember2006athttp://www.communities.gov.uk/
DCSF(2007).TheChildren’sPlan.BuildingBrighterFutures.London,DepartmentforChildren,SchoolsandFamilies
DCSF(2008).StayingSafe:ActionPlan.London,DepartmentforChildren,SchoolsandFamilies
DCSFandDH(2009).HealthyLives,BrighterFutures:theStrategyforChildrenandYoungPeople’sHealth.London,DepartmentofHealth
Defra(2006).E-digestStatisticsabout:AirQuality.ConcentrationsofParticulates.AccessedMay2007athttp://www.defra.gov.uk/
Defra(2008).BathingWaterDirective.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.defra.gov.uk/
Defra,ScottishExecutive,WelshAssemblyGovernmentandDepartmentofEnvironmentforNorthernIreland(2007).TheAirQualityStrategyforEngland,Scotland,WalesandNorthernIreland,Volume�.London,DepartmentforEnvironment,FoodandRuralAffairs
DETR(�999).EnvironmentalSamplingafteraChemicalAccident. London, The Stationery Office
DfES(2003).GuidelinesforEnvironmentalDesigninSchools.BuildingBulletin87(2ndEdition).London,DepartmentforEducationandSkills
DfES(2004).EveryChildMatters,ChangeforChildren.London,DepartmentforEducationandSkills
DfES(2007).Standard Specifications, Layouts and Dimensions 3. ToiletsinSchools.London,DepartmentforEducationandSkills
DfT(2000).Tomorrow’sRoads:SaferforEveryone.London,DepartmentforTransport
DfT(2007).ChildRoadSafety.Achievingthe20�0Target.London,DepartmentforTransport
DH(2003).TacklingHealthInequalities:AProgrammeforAction.London,DepartmentofHealth
DH(2004).ChoosingHealth.MakingHealthyChoicesEasier.London, The Stationery Office
DH(2005).TheNHSEmergencyPlanningGuidance2005.London,DepartmentofHealth
DH(2007).CancerReformStrategy.London,DepartmentofHealth
DH(2008a).ConsultationontheFutureofTobaccoControl.London,DepartmentofHealth
DH(2008b).HeatwavePlanforEngland.ProtectingHealthandReducingHarmfromExtremeHeatandHeatwaves.London,DepartmentofHealth
DH(2008c).HealthInequalities:ProgressandNextSteps.London,DepartmentofHealth
DHandDCSF(2008).HealthyWeight,HealthyLives:ACross-GovernmentStrategyforEngland.London,DepartmentofHealthandDepartmentofChildren,SchoolsandFamilies
DHandHPA(2007).HealthEffectsofClimateChangeintheUK,AnupdateoftheDepartmentofHealthreport200�/2002.HealthEffectsofClimateChangeintheUK,ExpertGroup.London,DepartmentofHealth
DHSSPS(2002).InvestingforHealth.Belfast,DepartmentforHealth,SocialServicesandPublicSafety
DoE(NI)(2002).NorthernIrelandRoadSafetyStrategy2002–20�2.Belfast,DepartmentfortheEnvironment.AccessedDecember2007athttp://www.roadsafetyni.gov.uk/
EA,EHS,FASandSEPA(2007).RadioactivityinFoodandtheEnvironment,2006.RIFE�2.Bristol,Belfast,London,Stirling,EnvironmentAgency,EnvironmentandHeritageService,FoodStandardsAgencyandScottishEnvironmentProtectionAgency
EdwardsP,GreenJ,RobertsIandLutchmanS(2006).Deathsfrominjuryinchildrenandemploymentstatusinfamily:analysis of trends in class specific death rates. BMJ,333,��9–�2�
FSA(FoodStandardsAgency)(2000).AReportontheStudyofInfectiousIntestinalDiseaseinEngland.London,TheStationery Office
9 References
5�
GaudermanWJ,VoraH,McConnellR,BerhaneK,GillilandF,ThomasD,LurmannF,AvolE,JunzliN,JerrettMandPetersJ (2007). Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from�0to�8yearsofage:acohortstudy.Lancet,369,57�–577
GreenH,McGinnityA,MeltzerH,FordTandGoodmanR(2005).MentalHealthofChildrenandYoungPeopleinGreatBritain,2004.Basingstoke,PalgraveMacMillian
Government Office for Science (2007). TacklingObesity:FutureChoices–ProjectReport(2ndEdition).London,DepartmentofInnovation,UniversitiesandSkills
GROS (General Register Office for Scotland) (2006). VitalEventsReferenceTables2005.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/
GROS (General Register Office for Scotland) (2007). VitalEventsReferenceTables2006.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/
GROS (General Register Office for Scotland) (2008). VitalEventsReferenceTables2007.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/
HealthySchools(2007).NationalHealthySchoolsProgramme.NationalAudit.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.healthyschools.gov.uk/
HensL(2007).EnvironmentalImpactsonCongenitalAnomalies–InformationfortheNon-expertProfessional.InCongenitalDiseasesandtheEnvironment(PNicolopoulou-Stamatietal,Eds),pp409–450.Springer
HMGovernment(2005).SecuringtheFuture.DeliveringUKSustainableDevelopmentStrategy.London,TheStationeryOffice
HMGovernment(2007a).PSADeliveryAgreement9:Halvethenumberofchildreninpovertyby20�0–��,onthewaytoeradicatingchildpovertyby2020.London,HMTreasury
HMGovernment(2007b).PSADeliveryAgreement2�:Buildmorecohesive,empoweredandactivecommunities.London,HMTreasury
HMGovernment(2007c).PSADeliveryAgreement23:Makecommunitiessafer.London,HMTreasury
HMGovernment(2008a).PSADeliveryAgreement�2:Improvethehealthandwellbeingofchildrenandyoungpeople.London,HMTreasury
HMGovernment(2008b).PSADeliveryAgreement�3:Improvechildrenandyoungpeople’ssafety.London,HMTreasury
HospitalEpisodeStatistics(2006).Primarydiagnosis:summary2005–06.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/
HospitalEpisodeStatistics(2008).Primarydiagnosis:summary2006–07.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/
HPA(2005).HealthProtectioninthe2�stCentury.UnderstandingtheBurdenofDisease;preparingforthefuture.London,HealthProtectionAgency.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape/
HPA(2007a).Children’sEnvironmentandHealthActionPlan.ASummaryofCurrentActivitieswhichAddressChildren’sEnvironmentandHealthIssueswithintheUK.Chilton,HealthProtectionAgency.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape/
HPA(2007b).GeneraloutbreaksofinfectiousintestinaldiseaseinEnglandandWales:2006.HealthProtectionReport,1(28)
HPA(2007c).Carbonmonoxide.AccessedFebruary2008athttp://www.hpa.org.uk
HPA(2008).Children’sEnvironmentandHealthStrategyfortheUnitedKingdom–ConsultationDocument.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape/
HPA(2009a).Children’sEnvironmentandHealthStrategyfortheUnitedKingdom.ASummaryofOutputsofthePublicConsultation.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape/
HPA(2009b).Children’sEnvironmentandHealthStrategyfortheUK–ConsultationWorkshop.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape/
HSE(HealthandSafetyExecutive)(2008).HSEsignscontractwithCapitatorunthenewgasinstallersregistrationscheme.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.hse.gov.uk/
InternationalAssociationfortheStudyofObesity(2007).GlobalTrendsinOverweight.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.iotf.org/
ISDScotland(2006).MalignantMelanomaoftheSkin,AnnualIncidence(�980Onwards).AccessedNovember2006athttp://www.isdscotland.gov.uk/
KirkwoodGandPollockA(2008).Preventinginjuryinchildhood.BMJ,336(7658),�388–�389
LungandAsthmaInformationAgency(2008).Asthma.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.laia.ac.uk/
LyonsRA,JonesS,KempA,SibertJ,ShepherdJ,RichmondP,BartlettCandPalmerSR(2002).Developmentanduseofapopulationbasedinjurysurveillancesystem:theAllWalesInjurySurveillanceSystem(AWISS).InjPrev,8(�),83–86
NICE(NationalInstituteforHealthandClinicalExcellence)(2008).PhysicalActivityandtheEnvironment.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.nice.org.uk
NETCEN(2005).AirQualityandSocialDeprivationintheUK.AnEnvironmentalInequalitiesAnalysis.AccessedJune2007athttp://www.airquality.co.uk/
NIRSA(NorthernIrelandStatisticsandResearchAgency)(2006).RegistrarGeneralAnnualReport2005–Section6Details–CauseofDeath.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.nisra.gov.uk/
NIRSA(NorthernIrelandStatisticsandResearchAgency)(2007).RegistrarGeneralAnnualReport2006–Section6Details–CauseofDeath.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.nisra.gov.uk/
NISRA(NorthernIrelandStatisticsandResearchAgency)(2008a).Deaths.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.nisra.gov.uk/
NISRA(NorthernIrelandStatisticsandResearchAgency)(2008b).VitalStatistics.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.nisra.gov.uk/
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
52
O’ConnellSEandDuarte-DavidsonR(2007).DevelopmentofaUKChildren’sEnvironmentandHealthStrategy.RegionalPriorityGoalIII:RespiratoryHealth–IndoorandOutdoorAirPollution.AccessedSeptember2007athttp://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape/
ODPM(2003).SustainableCommunities:BuildingOurFuture.London, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Accessed February2008athttp://www.communities.gov.uk/
Ofcom(2007).TelevisionAdvertisingofFoodandDrinkProductstoChildren.FinalStatement.AccessedMay2007athttp://www.ofcom.org.uk/
OFMDFM(2006).OurChildrenandYoungPeople–OurPledge.ATenYearStrategyforChildrenandYoungPeopleinNorthernIreland,2006–20�6. Belfast, Office of the First MinisterandDeputyFirstMinister
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2004). KeyPopulationandVitalStatistics.LocalandHealthAuthorityAreas.PopulationandvitalstatisticsbyareaofusualresidenceintheUnitedKingdom,2002.SeriesVSNo.29,PP�N.25.London,TheStationery Office
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2006a). MortalityStatistics.Cause.SeriesDH2No.32.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.statistics.gov.uk/
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2006b). CancerStatisticsRegistrations.Registrationsofcancerdiagnosedin�982–2005.AccessedNovember2006athttp://www.statistics.gov.uk/
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2008a). LiveBirths.FertilityHighestfor34Years.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.statistics.gov.uk/
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2008b). MortalityStatistics.DeathsRegisteredin2006.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.statistics.gov.uk/
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2008c). MortalityStatistics.DeathsRegisteredin2007.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.statistics.gov.uk/
PondK,KimR,CarroquinoM,PiradP,GoreF,CucuA,NemerL,MacKayM,SmedjeG,GeorgellisA,DalbokovaDandKrzyzanowskiM(2007).WorkgroupReport:DevelopingEnvironmentalHealthIndicatorsforEuropeanChildren:WorldHealthOrganizationWorkingGroup.EnvironHealthPerspect,115,�376–�382
RCGP(2006).WeeklyReturnsServiceAnnualPrevalenceReport2005.London,RoyalCollegeofGeneralPractitioners.AccessedDecember2007athttp://www.rcgp.org.uk/
RoSPA(2007).ChildSafetyStrategy.PreventingUnintentionalInjuriestoChildrenandYoungPeopleinScotland.AccessedDecember2007athttp://www.injuryobservatory.net/documents/childsafetystrategy_scotland.pdf
SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks) (2008). Potentialhealthrisksofexposuretonoisefrompersonalmusicplayersandmobilephonesincludingamusicplayingfunction.AccessedMarch2009athttp://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/scenihr_opinions_en.htm
ScottishExecutive(2005).ImprovingHealthinScotland–TheChallenge. Edinburgh, The Stationery Office
ScottishGovernment(2007).BetterHealth,BetterCare:ActionPlan.Edinburgh,ScottishGovernment
ScottishGovernment(2008a).GoodPlaces,BetterHealth.ANewApproachtoEnvironmentandHealthinScotland.ImplementationPlan.Edinburgh,ScottishGovernment
ScottishGovernment(2008b).TheEarlyYearsFramework.Edinburgh,ScottishGovernment
Scottish Office (1999). TowardsaHealthierScotland–AWhitePaperonHealth.Edinburgh, Stationery Office
Smith-PalmerAandBrownlieS(2006a).GeneraloutbreaksofinfectiousintestinaldiseasereportedtoObSurvduringthefirst quarter of 2006. HPSWeeklyReport,40,No.2006/25
Smith-PalmerAandBrownlieS(2006b).GeneraloutbreaksofinfectiousintestinaldiseasereportedtoObSurvduringthesecondquarterof2006.HPSWeeklyReport,40,No.2006/37
Smith-PalmerAandBrownlieS(2006c).GeneraloutbreaksofinfectiousintestinaldiseasereportedtoObSurvduringthethirdquarterof2006.HPSWeeklyReport,40,No.2006/49
Smith-PalmerAandBrownlieS(2007).GeneraloutbreaksofinfectiousintestinaldiseasereportedtoObSurvduringthefourthquarterof2006.HPSWeeklyReport,40,No.2007/�3
TheInformationCentre(2008).StatisticsonObesity,PhysicalActivityandDiet:England,January2008.AccessedMarch2009athttp://www.ic.nhs.uk/
TurnerL,JewkesF,AmlotRandSimpsonJ(2007).ExerciseYoung Neptune: mass decontamination of children field exercise,2ndofDecember2006.ChemicalHazardsandPoisonsReport,No.9,20–22
UNICEF(2007).ChildPovertyinPerspective:AnOverviewofChildWell-beinginRichCountries.Florence,UnitedNationsChildren’sFund
WelshAssemblyGovernment(2004).ChildrenandYoungPeople:RightstoAction.Cardiff,WelshAssemblyGovernment
WHO(2004).Children’sEnvironmentandHealthActionPlanforEurope.FourthMinisterialConferenceonEnvironmentandHealth,Budapest,23–25June2004
WHO(2005a).Children’sHealthandtheEnvironment.AGlobalPerspective.Geneva,WorldHealthOrganizationRegionalOffice for Europe
WHO(2005b).EffectsofAirPollutiononChildren’sHealthandDevelopment.AReviewoftheEvidence.Geneva,WorldHealth Organization Regional Office for Europe
WrightJ(2002).Chronicandoccultcarbonmonoxidepoisoning:wedon’tknowwhatwe’remissing.JAccidEmergMed,19,386–390
WykeSM,CapletonAC,O’ConnellSEandDuarte-DavidsonR(2007).DevelopmentofaUKChildren’sEnvironmentandHealthStrategy.RegionalPriorityGoalII:Accidents,Injuries,ObesityandPhysicalActivity.AccessedSeptember2007athttp://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape/
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
53
54
Summary of Children’s Environment and Health Strategy Priorities according to Regional Priority Goal (RPG)
RPG I Water, sanitation and health
RPG II Accidents, injuries, obesity and physical activity
RPG III Respiratory health, indoor and outdoor air pollution
RPG IV Chemical, physical and biological hazards
Preventingharm
Ensurecompliancewiththeleadindrinkingwaterqualitystandard
Improvedocumentationandqualityofprivatewatersupplies
Continuetoimprovesanitationfacilitiesinschoolsandchildcaresettings
Reduceexposuretocryptosporidiuminswimmingpools
EnsureacoordinatedapproachtoinjurypreventionthroughouttheUK
Promoteawarenessofrisksassociatedwithcarbonmonoxide
Educateadultsabouttheeffectsofenvironmentaltobaccosmokeonchildren
Developguidanceonlocalairqualitymanagementtoconsiderchildren specifically, whereappropriate
Encourageradontestingandremediationbyhouseholdersandlandlords
Considerapplyingtheradonactionlevelforhomestotheschoolandotherchildcareenvironments
Investigateoptionsforreducingorpreventingtheuseofsunbedsamongstchildrenandyoungpeople
Identifyschoolsaffectedbyhighnoiselevelsandimplementprotectivemeasures
Continuetoconsiderandinvolvechildrenandyoungpeopleinemergencyplanningandpreparednessexercises
Promotinghealth
Improvehygienebehavioursinchildren(e.g.hand-washing)
Continuetoencouragephysicalactivityamongstchildrenandyoungpeople
Improveaccesstoandstrategicplanningofgreenspaces
Greaterconsiderationandinclusionofchildrenandyoungpeopleinplanningurbanandresidentialareas
Developacoordinatedpolicyapproachtoindoorairqualitythatconsiderschildren specifically
Continuetoencouragehealthysunprotectionbehaviouramongstchildren
Continuetoteachchildrenaboutfoodhygiene
Improvingunderstanding
Investigatefurthertheimpactsofbathingwaterqualityonchildhealth
Improveunderstandingoffactorsinvolvedindiseaseoutbreaksassociatedwithswimmingpools
Evaluatetheimpactofwaterpovertyonchildhealthandwell-being
Investigatefurtherincidenceandeffectsofchroniccarbonmonoxidepoisoning
Reviewevidenceofproximitytomajorroadsand traffic and impact onchildhealthandlungdevelopment
Investigatethenon-auditoryhealthandwell-beingimpactsofnoiseonchildren
Identifymeanstofurtherreduceunintentionalpoisonings
Improveunderstandingofchildren’sexposuretochemicals
Improveunderstandingofchildren’sexposure to electromagnetic fields
Improveunderstandingofneurologicaldevelopmentalandotherhealtheffectsfromchemicalexposureinuteroorinearlylife
Improvingintelligence
Improvesurveillanceofinfectiousintestinaldisease(includingwaterbornedisease)particularlyamongstchildren
ImproveinjurysurveillancethroughouttheUK
Monitorsuccessofobesityandphysicalactivityinitiatives
Improvesurveillanceofbiologicalhazardssuchasfood-bornediseases
Reviewsystemsforreportingandsurveillanceofcongenitalabnormalities
Appendix A
Summary of the Children’s Environment and Health Strategy Recommendations for the UK
55
Summary of Children’s Environment and Health Strategy Priorities according to Burden of DiseaseKey areas Key recommendations Improving surveillance Improving understanding
Gastrointestinalillness
Continuetoteachchildrenaboutfoodhygiene
Improvehygienebehavioursinchildren(e.g.hand-washing)
Continuetoimprovesanitationfacilitiesinschoolsandchildcaresettings
Improvedocumentationandqualityofprivatewatersupplies
Reduceexposuretocryptosporidiuminswimmingpools
Improvesurveillanceofwaterbornedisease,particularlyamongstchildren
Improveunderstandingoffactorsinvolvedindiseaseoutbreaksassociatedwithswimmingpools
Investigatefurthertheimpactsofbathingwaterqualityonchildhealth
Evaluatetheimpactofwaterpovertyonchildhealthandwell-being
Injuriesandpoisonings
Promoteawarenessofrisksassociatedwithcarbonmonoxide
Ensureadequatesurveillanceofinjuriesandpoisonings
Improveunderstandingofunintentionalpoisoningsamongstchildrenandidentifymeansofreducingsuchevents
Obesityandphysicalactivity
Continuetoencouragephysicalactivityamongstchildrenandyoungpeople
Improveaccesstoandstrategicplanningofgreenspaces
Greaterconsiderationandinclusionofchildrenandyoungpeopleinplanningurbanandresidentialareas
Monitorsuccessofobesityandphysicalactivityinitiatives
Respiratoryhealth
Educateadultsabouttheeffectsofenvironmentaltobaccosmokeonchildren
Developacoordinatedpolicyapproachtoindoorairqualitythatconsiderschildrenspecifically
Developguidanceonlocalairqualitymanagementtoconsiderchildrenspecifically, where appropriate
Reviewevidenceofthehealthimpactsonchildhealthandchildlungdevelopmentofproximitytomajorroads and heavy traffic
Investigatefurthertheincidenceandeffectsofchroniccarbonmonoxidepoisoning
Radiation Continuetoencouragehealthysunprotectionbehaviouramongstchildren
Investigateoptionsforreducingorpreventingsunbeduseamongstchildrenandyoungpeople
Considerapplyingtheradonactionlevelforhomestotheschoolandotherchildcareenvironments
Encourageradontestingandremediationbyhouseholdersandlandlords
Improveunderstandingofchildren’sexposure to electromagnetic fields
Noiseandchemicals
Ensurecompliancewiththeleadindrinkingwaterqualitystandard
Identifymeanstofurtherreduceunintentionalpoisonings
Ensureadequatenoisecontrolinschoolenvironments
Reviewsystemsforreportingandsurveillanceofcongenitalabnormalities
Improveunderstandingofchildren’sexposuretochemicals
Investigatefurtherthenon-auditoryhealthandwell-beingimpactsofnoiseexposureonchildren
Improveunderstandingoftheneurologicaldevelopmentalandotherhealtheffectsfromchemicalexposuresinuteroorinearlylife
A C h i l d r e n ’ s e n v i r o n m e n t A n d h e A l t h s t r A t e g y f o r t h e U K
56
andwell-beingbyimprovingservicesandoutcomesandminimisinghealthinequalities.
TackingHealthInequalities:AProgrammeforAction(DH,2003)waslaunchedinJuly2003andisthecurrentcross-governmentstrategytocombathealthinequalities.Backedby�2departments,thisprogrammelaysthefoundationformeetingthegovernment’stargetstoreducethehealthgaponinfantmortalityandlifeexpectancyby20�0.Anevaluationofprogressandnextstepswaspublishedin2008(DH,2008c).
Northern IrelandInvestingforHealth(DHSSPS,2002)isthepublichealthstrategyforNorthernIrelandsettingouthowtoimprovehealthinNorthernIrelandandreducehealthinequalities.
OurChildrenandYoungPeople–OurPledge(OFMDFM,2006)isastrategyandactionplanaimedatensuringchildreninNorthern Ireland thrive and look to the future with confidence.
ScotlandTowardsaHealthierScotland (Scottish Office, 1999) is a public healthstrategyforScotlandwithafocusonhealthinequalitiesandimprovingchildrenandyoungpeople’shealth.
ImprovingHealthinScotland(ScottishExecutive,2005)providesaframeworktosupportanactiveprogrammetodeliverhealthimprovementpolicyinScotland.
BetterHealth,BetterCare(ScottishGovernment,2007)–thisActionPlansetsoutthegovernment’sprogrammetodeliverahealthierScotlandbyhelpingpeopletosustainandimprovetheirhealth,especiallyindisadvantagedcommunities,ensuringbetter,localandfasteraccesstohealthcare.
GoodPlaces,BetterHealth(ScottishGovernment,2008a)isanimplementationplanlookingathowthephysicalenvironmentinfluences health, with a particular focus on children.
EarlyYearsFramework(ScottishGovernment,2008b)setsouttheimportanceofgettingtheearlyyearsofachild’sliferight(pre-birthto8yearsold)andgivingchildrenthebeststartinlife.
WalesHealthChallengeWales(http://new.wales.gov.uk/hcwsubsite/healthchallenge/?lang=en)isaninitiativetoimproveandprotecthealthandwell-beinginWales.
ChildrenandYoungPeople:RightstoAction(WelshAssemblyGovernment,2004)isthestrategicapproachadoptedinWales,basedontheUnitedNationsConventionontheRightsoftheChild,forimplementingtheChildrenAct2004andimprovingoutcomesforchildrenandyoungpeoplefrombirthtoadulthood.
UK policiesSecuringtheFuture.DeliveringUKSustainableDevelopmentStrategy(HMGovernment,2005)setsouthowthegovernmentaimstodeliverabetterqualityoflifeintheUK,nowandforgenerationstocome,throughensuringsustainabledevelopment.ItincludesanumberofindicatorsofgeneralrelevancetotheChildren’sEnvironmentandHealthStrategy(e.g. air pollution, flooding and environmental inequality) and some of specific relevance to children, including childhood poverty,healthinequality(infantmortality),childhoodobesity,gettingtoschool,andchildrenkilledorseriouslyinjuredinroadaccidents.TheseindicatorsareusedtomonitorprogressonimplementingtheSustainableDevelopmentStrategyonanannualbasis.
EnglandEveryChildMatters,ChangeforChildren(DfES,2004)setsoutthegovernment’scross-cuttingnationalframeworktobuildservicesaroundtheneedsofchildrenandyoungpeopleinEngland.Thisaimsforeverychildtobehealthy,staysafe,enjoyandachieve,makeapositivecontributionandachieveeconomicwell-being.ThisisunderpinnedbytheChildrenAct2004whichprovidesthelegislativebasisforthisframework.
ChoosingHealth:MakingHealthierChoicesEasier(DH,2004)outlineshowthegovernmentintendstoprovidepracticalsupportandinformationtoimproveindividuals’accesstoservicessothattheycanmakehealthierchoices.Thisfocusesonanumberofareas,includingchildrenandyoungpeople,andaimstoreduceinfantmortality,supportallchildrentoattaingoodphysicalandmentalhealth,reduceinequalities,andensurechildrendevelopagoodunderstandingofopportunitiesandrisksinchoicesthataffecttheirhealth.
Children’sPlan:BuildingBrighterFutures(DCSF,2007)aimstomakeEnglandthebestplaceintheworldforchildrenandyoungpeopletogrowup.Itfocusesonanumberofgoalsfor2020whichhavebeendevelopedfollowingconsultationwithparentsandyoungpeople.Thesegoalsincludestrengtheningsupportforfamilies,workingtowardsachievingworld-classschools,involvingparentsintheirchildren’slearning,andensuringchildrenhavemoreplacestoplayandexcitingthingstodo.
EducationandInspectionsAct(2006)placesastatutorydutyonthegoverningbodiesofmaintainedschoolstopromotethewell-beingofchildrenandyoungpeopleaswellastheiracademic achievement. In part fulfilment of this duty the DepartmentforChildren,SchoolsandFamiliesisdevelopingguidanceforschoolsonpromotingwell-being.
HealthyLives,BrighterFutures:theStrategyforChildrenandYoungPeople’sHealth(DCSFandDH,2009)presentsthegovernment’svisionforchildren’sandyoungpeople’shealth
Appendix B
Summary of Policies of Relevance to Children’s Health and Well-being
Acknowledgements
This document has been prepared by the Health Protection Agency at the request of the Department of Health, on behalf of the Interdepartmental Steering Group on Environment and Health. This Steering Group consists of representatives of the following government and devolved administration departments and agencies:
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Department for Communities and Local Government
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Department of Transport
Department of Health (Chair)
Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (Northern Ireland)
Department of the Environment (Northern Ireland) – Environment and Heritage Service
Environment Agency
Food Standards Agency
Health Protection Agency
Scottish Environment Protection Agency
Scottish Government
Welsh Assembly Government
The views expressed in this document do not necessarily represent those of any single government or devolved administration department or agency.
We gratefully acknowledge the involvement of children and young people in providing their views, which have been invaluable. We also gratefully acknowledge the contribution made by all the consultees during the public consultation.
Prepared by Raquel Duarte-Davidson, Alexander Capleton, Stacey Wyke, Rob Orford, Tina Endericks and Gary Coleman
A Children’s Environment and Health Strategy for the UK
This document has been prepared by the Health Protection Agency at the request of the Department of Health, on behalf of the Interdepartmental Steering Group on Environment and Health.
Please direct any queries concerning this report to [email protected]
Copies of the report and supporting documents are available at http://www.hpa.org.uk/cehape
March 2009ISBN 978-0-85951-638-9© Health Protection Agency
Health Protection AgencyCentre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental HazardsChemical Hazards and Poisons DivisionChiltonDidcotOxfordshire OX11 0RQUnited Kingdom
Tel: +44(0)1235 822895Email: [email protected]
March 2009ISBN 978-0-85951-638-9© Health Protection AgencyPrinted on chlorine-free paper
A Children’s Environment and Health Strategy for the UK
A C
hild
ren’s En
viron
men
t and
Health
Strategy fo
r the U
K