19.12.2011 Seite 1
Cap Coast II
Dissemination Workshop
December 13, 2011
Senate Room, Hyatt Regency
New Delhi
19.12.2011 Seite 2 Page 2
Key project results
Andhra Pradesh State Presents
19.12.2011
AP
by
AGS and Jagrithi
19.12.2011 Seite 3 Page 3
Andhra Pradesh State pilot Profile
Support NGOs: AGS-Tirupathi and JAGRITI – Nellore
East
Godavari
Visakhapatnam
Krishna
Nellore
Prakasam
No of Districts covered : 5
No of NGOs : 5
No of pilots : 20
(Cap coast II)
No of communities provided
soft support (Cap coast –I ): 4
Total Communities: 24
Total Population : 29,280
No of families : 7,766
No of House holds: 5,907
19.12.2011 Seite 4
28.71
20.06
8.65
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Total AGS Jagrithi
Local contribution / Voluntary contribution
GIZ support Rs.
Total cost Rs.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Total AGS Jagrithi
Drinking Water
Soil and land based
Total cost Rs.
Financial Outlay Cap coast II Financial allocation
Sector wise
19.12.2011 Seite 5 Page 5
AP project stream of Activities
19.12.2011
AP Water based activities: (10)
• Gravity Fed Water
Supply System (GFWSS)
(3)
• R.O. Plants (5)
• Water supply system (2)
Soil and land based
activities: (10) •Construction of CC Drain and Culvert
(2)
•Renovation/ desiltation of existing
Irrigation drain channel ( 2 )
•Protection of Catchment Area and
shelters for Siberian Birds ( 1 )
•Strengthening river/coastal bunds ( 2 )
•Renovation & desiltation of Tank &
Feeder Channel (1)
•Roads raising and arranging proper
drainage channels (1)
•Formation of Rain / Flood water
harvesting ponds (1)
19.12.2011 Seite 6 Page 6
Description of the AP project stream
19.12.2011
• To upscale the approaches,
methodologies and pilots developed
under the Cap Coast II Project and
thereby reduce the vulnerabilities of
Coastal communities to climate change
risk through adaptation by establishing
processes and structures that
strengthen the local capacities to
assess, plan and respond to climate-
related challenges
Objective
• Vulnerable Groups from 5 Costal District of
Andhra Pradesh state, who live in difficult
situations and direct affect with climate
change
• Tribal and Primitive tribal Groups
• Backward small and marginal farmers
live in Islands and urban slums
• Schedule Caste effect CC with human
led factors
• Fisher folk live at sea coast and flood
prone areas
Target group
AP
19.12.2011 Seite 7 Page 7 19.12.2011
AP
Photographs of showing the Problem of Stream of Activities
19.12.2011 Seite 8 Page 8 19.12.2011
AP
Photographs of showing the Problem of Stream of Activities
19.12.2011 Seite 9 Page 9
• Drinking water scarcity
• Salt water seepage in the sources of irrigation
• loss of livelihoods, deterioration of soil fertility
• Loss of vegetation
• Loss of employment
• Mangroves damage
• Food scarcity
19.12.2011
• Damages to Existing Water Bodies / Structures.
• Drinking water scarcity for household and Livestock
• Water Contamination and
• Loss of employment
• Inadequate Electricity Supply
• Erosion of sea/river/back water beach/bunds
• Water born and related diseases
• Loss of human life
• Damages to Infrastructure including houses agriculture
• Damages to communication and disruption to transport
• Disruption to Civil Supplies.
•drinking water scarcity.
•salination of ground water sources.
•Salinity of River waters
•Sea erosion.
• Drinking water scarcity
• Water contamination
• Loss of employment
• Disruption of electricity supply to aquaculture, community and
house hold.
• Damage to Electrical Infrastructure
• Affects on Vegetation, trees, wind barriers of fields
• Food scarcity
• Water born and related diseases
• Psycho-social issues trauma, fear, anxiety
• Loss of human life
• Damages to houses and household items
• Damages to communication and disruption to transport
• Disruption to Civil Supplies
AP
Observed impacts
Observed impacts
19.12.2011 Seite 10 Page 10 19.12.2011
• Adopted an action oriented process
• 20 Adaptation plans prepared through community planning and identified 103 climatic issues,
• 20 issues addressed in a span of three months period. From September to December 2011,
• Rs. 28 lakhs have been mobilized in terms of Shram dan ( voluntary lobour)
• About 93.71 lakhs worth of works taken up through 20 pilots,
• Total 11 workshops at each community level workshops organised.
• Community level workshops organized,
• District level workshops organized,
• State level orientations have taken up,
• The pilots used indigenous technology
• Sustainable models,
• About 29000 population got long term sustainable activities in a span of three months, gives a tangible results,
• A strong base is People participation
,
. AP
Interesting facts and figures
93.71
49.61 44.1
Total Pilot cost in lakhs
Total Pilot Cost Support for Water related Measures
Total Pilot Support for Land & Soil
Related Measures
Cap Coast II – Pilot Cost Allocation
Series1
19.12.2011 Seite 11 Page 11
Implemented measures (innovative examples)
19.12.2011
Measure Community Why innovative? Impacts addressed
1. Gravity Fed
Water Supply
System (GFWSS),
VJNNS
Jerrila • Sustainable measure for a period of
15 to 20 years
•Water availability in any climatic
conditions,
• No burden in collection of water,
•“0” maintenance, not much cost is
involved,
• Entire community is benefitted
• Eco friendly system, No power, No
Motor
• Drinking Water Scarcity
• Health
• Reduced working hours
(Economic)
• Women and girl children are
freed from the drudgery of
collection of water,
• More Time is saved to the
women and girl children, in
turn women could participate
in the economic activities,
• Girl child now can continue
her education without any
break.
AP
19.12.2011 Seite 12 Page 12 19.12.2011
Measure Community Why innovative? Impacts addressed
Formation of rain/flood
water harvesting form
ponds, GUIDE
Gollamanda 1st of its kind in the island
area. There are very few
examples in coastal
villages where farmponds
are developed
Leaving a portion of the
land for creating water
resources in the entire
village
Though it is a new feature,
100% villagers/farmers
opted for it.
It taps fresh water from
rainfall, floods, Krishna river
(for certain season) and
canal water
Vulnerability of crops to
erratic rainfall, high
temparature, ground water
salinity due to SLR and
extreme weather events
addressed.
It provides supplementary
income to the farmers
through vegetable cultivation
on the bunds, pisci culture in
the pond etc.
AP
Implemented measures (innovative examples)
19.12.2011 Seite 13 Page 13 19.12.2011
Measure Community Why innovative? Impacts addressed
Renovation/ desiltation of
existing drainage channel,
GUIDE
Bramhaiahgarimula This is the first effort to
revive the agricultural
drainage system in the
island after the
irrigation reservoir was
constructed in 1992-93.
Protects standing crops from
inundation during high
precipitation and extreme
weather events.
It also improves supply
system as the drainage
system of u/s village
improves water supply to the
next village.
AP
Implemented measures (innovative examples)
19.12.2011 Seite 14 Page 14 19.12.2011
Measure Communit
y
Why innovative? Impacts addressed
Strengtheni
ng
river/coastal
bunds,
SRAVANTI
Karavaka • Applied Indigenous
Technology
• Used Bamboo Mats,
Filled Sand Bags for
construction of Wall
• Bund Constructed
with Causirina Posts
tied with Bamboo
Mats
• Planted Manogroves
to protect the bund
from erosion
• Coconut plantation
on the bund to
provide additional
strength in binding
the soil
The proposed
measure is
addressing the risk
of inundation and
erosion due to high
precipitation and
extreme weather
events.
AP
Implemented measures (innovative examples)
19.12.2011 Seite 15 Page 15 19.12.2011
Measure Community Why innovative? Impacts addressed
Protection of Catchment
Area and shelters for
Siberian Birds SRAVANTI
Punyakshethram • provides shelter and
food for visiting
Siberian birds,
• recharge of ground
water.
• These birds were
natural pest
controllers and
• litter of birds is
affective manure.
• Feeder channels
rejuvenated
• This pilot measure
addresses bio-
diversity.
• Helps ground water
recharge and
• conserves soil
moisture
AP
Implemented measures (innovative examples)
19.12.2011 Seite 16 Page 16
Photographs of Best 5 Pilot
Measures
(before & after)
19.12.2011
19.12.2011 Seite 17 Page 17
Gravity Fed Water Supply System (GFWSS), VJNNS
Before After
19.12.2011 Seite 18 Page 18
Renovation/ desiltation of existing drainage channel, GUIDE
before work After work
Before After
19.12.2011 Seite 20 Page 20
Operation & maintenance in general
19.12.2011
Financial aspects 1. District Administration : Rural Water Supply Departments, Minor Irrigation Department…
2. PRI Funds 3. CSOs 4. Corporates Social Responsibility : RO Owners Contribution 5. Lads of MP, MLA & MLC 6. Consortium Funding 7. Other Donors : Like „Spurthi Foundation‟
Technical aspects
• Pilot measures are based on Indigenous Technology.
• All the O&M future Needs, Financial aspects and Responsibilities discussed and planned at Community level
• Pilot Beneficiaries, Key responsible Stakeholders agreed to oversee the overall sustenance aspects
Organisational aspects
• Village Development Committees, Water User Associations, PRI, Local Implementing NGO, Supporting Organisations will involve
• Yes. Since all the measures are indigenous based Technology and Low Cost maintenance it doesn‟t require External support.
AP
19.12.2011 Seite 21 Page 21
Key results – a detailed example
Description
19.12.2011
The water from the springs is collected to
the spring box and will be piped to the
Filter cum distribution tank. Basing the
static levels of the ground. The filter tank
consists two filter chambers – one for
reverse filter where sedimentation takes
place and second slow sand filter system
provides filter water to the storage tank.
From there it goes to the users end.
Involved groups • Jerrela, Tribal people living in remote and
hilly terrain areas, Local CBOs involved.
VJNNS, Is implementing the programme.
[Please insert 1 photo of the
implementation of this measure]
Operation & maintenance
•Operation and maintenance:Village Development Committee (VDC) •Community Members, •No technology is needed, •Low cost maintenance. Spring Protection
-Cladding at collection point -Air blocks at pipe line -Slow filtration -Leakage at tap points -Waste water management
AP
Gravity Fed Water Supply System (GFWSS
19.12.2011 Seite 22 Page 22
Key results – Overview
Achievements
19.12.2011
• State Level Workshops : 5
• District Level Workshops : 10
• Community Level Workshops : 160
• Total Pilots implemented : 20
• Total Local Adaptation Guides : 20
In time? • Yes, Completed.
AP
19.12.2011 Seite 23 Page 23
Problems and barriers on the way…
19.12.2011
• Shortage of time for mobilization of community
• Mobilization and Organizing community in Semi urban areas.
• Seasonal effects for implementation of the project in certain areas
• ...
AP
19.12.2011 Seite 24 Page 24
Lessons learned
19.12.2011
Experiences
• . ... “-”
• Community participation is key factor for success of the pilots.
• High participation - wherein community gets direct benefits.
• Time constraint - very short term,
• Difficult to explore the climatic future impacts by the community,
• Short term interventions not enough, to address climate change,
• Cooperation and collaboration with CBOs , PRIs, NGOs, Line departments etc.
• Approach we applied : Peoples Participation at all levels (Identification of Problem – Priotization – Implementation - Monitoring and
Maintaining)
“+”
AP
19.12.2011 Seite 25 Page 25 19.12.2011
• Yes, we suggest.
• There is need and scope for replication
• Overall Andhra Pradesh state.
• ...
Location
• Rain water Harvesting,
• Recharge of Ground Water
• Discharge of inundated water,
• Spring and Catchment area protection,
• Fodder development
• Crop diversification like SRI cultivation. Drought resistant crops
• Promotion of non conventional energy systems ( Biogas, Solar)
• Promotion of Gravity fed water supply systems.
• Renovation of water bodies
• Biodiversity (flora funa)
• ...
Topics
• NGOs, Local CBOs, PRIs and Line departments.
• Role: Community mobilization, Raising of local contributions ( kind and cash), Monitoring, Social audit and future O & M,
• ...
Institutions
AP
Outlook
19.12.2011 Seite 26 Page 26
Guiding questions for the discussion
Did you (the audience) have similar experiences in your
region as pointed out during this presentation?
Do you agree with the list of innovative measures presented
before?
Any suggestions to improve quality in pilot measures …
Feedback
19.12.2011
AP
19.12.2011 Seite 27 Page 27 19.12.2011
AP
Photographs of Stream of Activities
Thank you