Download - Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
1/73
INTRODUCTION
This thesis is a political analysis that reaches out to the many different audiences
that have a stake in higher educations past, present, and future. For those alumni of
Union, especially those who consider their relationship with the college strained by the
controversial changes that have occurred over the past decade, this analysis will help to
put some issues at rest, raise new ones, and give you a intimate analysis on why your alma
mater acts the way it does.
For the incoming students onto our campus, this analysis will give you a
perspective on the tireless and often thankless years of work that have gone into preparing
this school for your arrival and through studying it, you should be better prepared for the
years just ahead in a place that will, in all likelihood, shape your future identity. This
analysis will also reach administrators, deans and professors, and others who oversee our
enterprise of higher learning. There are serious policy implications addressed in this
research and anyone with concern for the future of student affairs or the intellectual
culture of a college should be made better aware of the mechanism that drive the
participants of the higher education community like Unions.
1
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
2/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
3/73
Literature Review and Historical Analysis:
Over the past two hundred years, a legacy can be traced that has given identity to
small residential liberal arts colleges in America. By examining the evolution of these
institutions, and more specifically Union College, it is evident that there are several key
factors throughout history that have evoked significant change in the dynamics of what
and who defines policy here. These changes are outlined throughout specific events in
history, all of which in some way affected the political dynamics of colligate institutions
and how they are governed.
3
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
4/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
5/73
read as a means to understand the guiding spirit that gave birth to colleges like Union, and
how such colleges formed their mission and purpose as an academic institution: John
Thelins A History of American Higher Education, Laurence Veyseys The Emergence of
the American University, Helen Lefkowitz Horowitzs Campus Life, and a chapter from
Frederick Rudolphs The American College and University entitled, The College
Movement. All four of these authors agree that understanding a colleges heritage is a
key factor in being able to determine what the mission of a specific colleges future is.
However, these authors disagree in how large a part historical legacy plays in defining the
nature of politics among the contemporary stakeholders on campus.
If we can understand better the events of the past, we can better understand how
Union got to be the way it is and where we fit in it as students, teachers, administrators, or
alumni. An advocate to this approach is John Thelin who, in his introductory chapter in
A History of American Higher Education writes, Colleges and Universities are historical
institutions. They may suffer amnesia or may have selective recall, but ultimately
heritage is the lifeblood of our campuses. Thelins theory is that a schools identity
emerges out of the struggles and debates of its history, thus when examining the present
the past cannot be ignored.
The first colleges of the early nineteenth century had little identity, as they were
just beginning to form a place within society. Frederick Rudolph, wrote of the college
movement in The American College and University,that the idea of colleges during this
5
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
6/73
time was a broad social experiment, whose missions and patterns of leadership were not
easily defined, fiercely debated, and whose futures were far from certain. Rudolph goes
so far as to stateCollege-founding in the nineteenth century was undertaken in the same
spirit as canal-building, cotton-ginning, farming, and gold-mining. In none of these
activities did completely rational procedures prevail (Rudolph, 49). It is evident that
colleges from their very beginning had to struggle with imbalances and inequities in
resources and stakeholders as they struggled to form their missions and mere survival
within society.
While the contemporary inequities facing a college are not nearly as extreme now
as they were during the early college movement, they certainly have always been a
challenge to the decision makers on campus. Helen Lefkowitz Horowitz in her book,
Campus Life, made this evident in descriptions of the early style of college men, as
Horowitz calls them, whose identity was forged through student revolt against draconian
administrative laws in effect during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It
was during this time that colleges experienced a wave of collective student uprisings, led
by the wealthier and worldlier undergraduates commonly in attendance there.
What held true for all the institutions that survived these tumultuous times was the
supreme will of all stakeholders involved to endure under a guiding mission or purpose.
Truly, the oldest surviving institutions like Union and its aged peers call on the brightest
and best heroes from its past in order to define its mission for the future. It has been said
6
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
7/73
that colleges in America were on the frontier of American progress at the time of their
formation and the best ones now are the ones that have stayed on the cutting edge to this
day. John Thelin supports this idea by concluding that the academic institutions that have
grown with the country and have had tough-minded awareness of changing conditions,
while maintaining a continued purpose for the future survived this time period (Thelin,
xiii).
There were multiple motivations behind founding a college in the nineteenth
century in America. One driving factor was the rivalry that existed at that time between
neighboring states America. Frederick Rudolph, in his chapter entitled The College
Movement, told of how each state, as it developed, sought to make itself a new center of
learning modeled after the learning centers of Oxford and Cambridge of their ancestral
England. Such powerful institutions were needed to attract the countrys brightest and
best people to their cities to spend their dollars, in turn advancing the sates interests.
Moreover, if ones state did not have a place of learning for native youth, these youth
would seek an education elsewhere, driving potential profitable business to other states.
Therefore, colleges in the 1800s were founded with a provincial focus to serve the local
community and to stay regional.
A second motivating factor behind founding colleges can from religious
congregations, who also took an interest in forming new colleges. Presbyterians, Roman
Catholics, Methodists and Baptists all sought to have a college of their own in every
7
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
8/73
American state, as a means to further stabilize and enhance their religious communities.
The idea of establishing a college during this time acted as a powerful means to advance a
groups identity. Thus, there was little emphasis placed on creating a college with a
mission that differed from the original mission of the organization seeking to establish the
college.
The final motivation behind founding a college in this era, beyond serving a
provincial community, or a congregation, was for the purpose of serving to better
American society as a whole. This college mission was born out of the notion that men
and eventually women, had an obligation to give back to society and that it was through
these up and coming colleges that such an individual would be given the chance to do so.
It was out of this idea that basic guidelines were established for how the early colleges
would conduct and govern themselves. Fredrick Rudolph references sentiments
expressed by President Joseph McKeen at Bowdoin in 1802 in which McKeen stresses the
importance of remembering that literary institutions were, and still are to this day
founded and maintained for the common good of society. McKeen also argues that once
a person enters such an institution, that it then becomes that individuals responsibility to
cultivate an enhance their knowledge for the purpose to - in someway - improve and
contribute to the greater good of society (Rudolph, 58).
President Joseph McKeen was not alone in drawing such conclusions about the
purpose and mission of these literary institutions, as well as the role and obligation that
8
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
9/73
one has once they enter such an institution. However, as these academic communities
have evolved it is clear that this mission has shifted and even faded out of many of the
existing college communities. The desire for individual success coupled with self-
indulging behaviors by people or groups of people associated with these colleges has
overpowered the ideals on which such institutions were founded on. There is not one
specific factor that can be attributed to this shift, one that has created a need for personal
wealth rather than a global wealth, never the less such change has occurred and in turn
has impacted the governance of many colligate institutions, including Union College.
Reverend Peter Gomes, of Harvard, recently stated in a speech he gave at Union Colleges
Founders Day:
I noticed the admissions statement of the college, that ends on a glorious note
about the liberal arts education being essential to the future of mankind. It is very
noble, but it does not go far enough, for it does not state the business as your
founders did and I hope you fill, that the whole purpose of this enterprise is not
personal, private, interior decoration but rather it is to improve our commonwealth
for civil discourse, common equability, and public good.
As one can see from the words of Gomes and other luminaries, the notion that a college
should serve to better society through the lives of dedicated graduates was not new, and
indeed as a collegiate mission and guiding purpose it would never entirely disappear. Yet,
what would stand out in the first half of the nineteenth century would be the degree to
which these colleges diluted their original missions. Fredrick Rudolph attributes many of
these mission changes to national social and political trends. Rudolph states: As the
9
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
10/73
public displaced the public servant in the conduct of civil affairs, the college was denied
some of its sense of purposeAmericans lost their sense of society and substituted for it
a reckless individualism (Rudolph, 60). Certainly there were moments and speeches
recorded where the humane missions of civil service were highly touted by lead
administrators during the turn of the nineteenth century, but never the less as highlighted
by Rudolph, American society had changed and the expectations placed on these colleges
would change with it.
The now emerging leadership of the elite liberal arts college would be more
concerned about the expectations of their students than about the expectations of society.
To the students and their parents, the view of the college would become very close to
being a place where one could experience indulgence than a place where one should be
tutored in ones obligation to better serve the nation. For many years, however, a
fundamental purpose of the college movement in the United States was one that centered
on a global mission, as President McKeen had expressed so well in 1802 (Rudolph, 60).
The liberal college campus at this time was clinging to the best ideals of their
genteel tradition in the face of shifting societal expectations on what the educational
experience requires. Helen Lefkowitz Horowitz in her book, Campus Life, examines the
political and social dynamics that were beginning to emerge at this time within the
upcoming generation of students, and how this initiated change to the college mission.
Horowitz argues that mans reasoning for attending college is what changed. Young men
10
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
11/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
12/73
create strong political structures, as a means to ensure a civilized governance of the
college and its mission during periods of change.
In taking stock of the political arrangements of the academic community taking
shape at the end of this period, there existed three main focal points for ambition, or
rather three centers of vested interest within an academic community: the individual,
concerned with their own career; the department, seeking to improvement its position
with respect to other departments; and the local institution as a whole, competing with
other such institutions. All three of these groups have influenced and continue to
influence the purpose of ones college, and it is the structure and communication within
and between these groups that define the politics of the college.
II: Money & Prestige: The Academic Revolution in the 20th
century and its impact
on the roles and responsibilities of students, faculty and administration
Alexander Astin, in studying life at a liberal arts college found that at the most
elite of the college levels, the quality of a students experience was unmatched. Given his
findings, one might have expected that the traditional liberal arts campus structure would
be adopted as the principal model for the many new institutions that took shape following
WWII. But the massive expansion of Americas higher education system that took place
12
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
13/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
14/73
millions of federal dollars proved too tempting to resist. Research and not classes and
relationships became the primary function of many a department on the larger university
campuses.
As faculty were recruited, retained, and promoted on the basis of producing
notable scholarly works, the emphasis moved away from the teaching and the student
interaction side of the faculty role. Therefore, the rise of the modern American research
University began with its own unique ethics and culture that is beyond the scope of my
research. But this important national trend in higher education is relevant in its profound
impact on the identity of the liberal arts college as it strove to respond to the rapid social
changes. The response was a reworking of the total mission of the institution. Usually,
in the name of raising standards and broadening the base, these college have largely
succeeded in adapting to their own purposes the methods and styles of the larger
institutions. A casualty of this wholesale adaptation is often the loss of an institutional
character or personality that would justify its existence in comparison with the very
places it imitates, and with which it competes (Gomes, 103). The religious ethics and
genteel tradition and values needed to be played down so that our overshadowed academic
communities could still appear fashionable in relation to the larger and more secular
research universities.
In a structural and academic sense therefore, the liberal arts education has become
associated more with completing a series of course credits and a Bachelors degree than
14
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
15/73
with acquiring the skills, mindset, and values personified in the founding colleges
mission statement. College as a rite of passage, as places for boys to become men
seemed less and less a goal but more of a fortunate bonus, should the graduates receive it.
In essence, to many larger state universities and many non-residential and less selective
community colleges, a liberal arts education was interpreted in credits and not in the
community of learning.
A Broken Consensus
This change in national trends both social and economic factors contributed
greatly to the changing identity of the traditional college education. More and more, the
distinction between teaching roles and research roles was blurred. The vanishing
distinction post WWII was that professors at colleges taught and professors at universities
did research. Small residential and highly selective universities of the northeast found
themselves in the minority and now having to compete with larger universities that
offered more affordable education for students, and greater research capability and
exposure for rising faculty members.
Each stakeholders role and responsibility on campus became individually
motivated and not community oriented. Faculty members were there to advance their
research and thus their careers. This shift in faculty priorities on private liberal arts
campuses meant to Reverend Gomes that, college culture was more frequently defined
and maintained by professional administrators hired for the purpose and often at a remove
15
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
16/73
from the central academic mission of the school (Gomes 105). The result was
fragmentation of the traditional residential college campus. Faculty broke down into
competing departments, students increasingly into social organizations and further into
cliques. The result was less time and energy necessary to contemplate the ideals, culture,
goals, and values necessary for a shared community to remain stable. Gomes defined this
is his articles as A Broken Consensus.
This is evidence of a shift in roles and responsibilities for not just the faculty and
administration but for the students as well. This change in responsibility across different
colleges affected perceptions on who was responsible for what. When it came to
responsibility for the economics of paying for education, a shift began to occur here as
well, which affected the content and the style of students who were entering these
communities.
Harvards president in the first half of the twentieth century spearheaded an
innovative phenomenon to expand the pool of applicants that Harvard could pull from.
Reaching outside the traditional group of private high schools, he began the first
programs of financial aid for the hefty tuition. These innovations would not only keep the
small communities competitive, but would begin to attract students from all financial
walks of life. This would in turn bring economic diversity to the formerly closed and
homogenous campuses of the northeast, but gender and racial diversity would not show
itself on the scene of colleges like Union until the nation became to simmer and boil with
16
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
17/73
the seeds of national unrest over two powerful movements that followed each other in
rapid succession: the civil rights movement, and the anti-war movement. Both
movements would bring greater diversity to the private college campus and change the
nature of living and learning there.
The buildings that for the previous centuries had made many of the liberal arts
colleges what they were: close-knit, residential communities of values. This issue can be
described in this way, forty years ago historian Allan Nevins described the importance of
campus architecture in the institutional saga: One of the more difficult obligations of
these new institutions has been the creation of an atmosphere, a tradition, a sense of the
past which might play as important a part in the education of sensitive students as any
other influence. This requires time, sustained attention to cultural values, and the special
beauties of landscape and architecture. (Thelin, xxi). Taken from an example more
close to home, The Garnett Yearbooks 1952 edition describes the college fraternity
houses as representing concrete living evidence that Union not only provides for the
scholastic and cultural enlightenment of her students but also for their social education.
Reverend Gomes agrees with Thelin in terms of the impact that traditional and
historical structures of a college like in Harvards case, their main chapel or in Unions
case, the fraternal mansions, can influence its identity greatly. The result, he believes, has
not always ended up for the good. Gomes states:
17
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
18/73
If, in the felicitous phrase with which the president of Harvard confers the
several degrees in design, architecture helps to shape the space in which we live,
then simply by looking at so many of our older elite residential liberal arts
colleges we are able to imagine both what the founders intended to say about their
schools and what is now, for so many of them, the problem of that legacy(Gomes, 102).
This suggests that the culture of a society can transition rapidly with current events, but
the building of the campus and the traditions upheld underneath their esteemed roofs may
not always project an image for the schools identity thats convenient or even compatible
at that current time.
III: The legacy of culture wars of 1960, experimentation and reform of 1970s
The culture wars on many of the countrys larger research universities over the
issue of diversity and greater participation occurred because of events driving profound
shifts in Americas system of values, namely those espoused in the civil rights movement
and the anti-war movement ending in the Watergate scandal. The Watergate scandal
represented a rift in the moral infallibility attached to the highest levels of our government
administrators and this was reflected on the leadership of the college campuses as well.
Few institutions of higher education were spared from these culture wars.
Notions of civility, deference, and a treasured sense of continuity had fallen victim to
crises for relevance, engagement, and transformation. The small residential colleges,
18
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
19/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
20/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
21/73
Millet writes also that as in the past, the behavior of student leaders and some
student organizations continued to result in some adverse public comment and replied
that to the campus-wide governance, the preparations of regulations to prevent or control
disruption of the community required considerable debate and care (Millet, 253). Faculty
members, on the other hand, did not want students meddling in what were viewed by
them as purely faculty affairs such as policies and standards affecting faculty personnel
actions. These stakeholders as a body were accustomed to coming to their own consensus
on things such as degree requirements and curriculum and presenting their decisions to
the deans and the boards for consideration. The participation and criticism from student
representatives in a central forum where such issues were now considered struck them as
a diminution of their authority (Millet, 254).
Another major weakness in the development of campus wide governance
structures like this was the belief that the other overarching governing bodies for both
faculty and students could be dispensed with. For how could the faculty treat with
students as equals and still impose rules and regulations on their conduct that relegated
them as children? Furthermore, these students did not want their conduct limited without
the equal say in faculty conduct and curriculum. The result was often deadlock or an
agreement that both parties would stay out of each others camp as they teamed up against
the efforts of a common parent, the administration and the presidents office.
21
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
22/73
In an open participatory decision-making structure, the third major party, the
administrators found it necessary to spend a great deal more time and effort than in the
past explaining and justifying various support services, including auxiliary enterprises.
The college managements role in the delivery of support programs was now subjected to
a degree of student and faculty oversight and interest that had not existed in the decades
prior. There was even some record of how presidents and their administrative colleagues
claiming just how much more costly and less efficient rendering support services were
becoming as a result of this unwelcome type of interference. In The Encyclopedia of
Union College History, the shortcomings of the open participatory model enacted on our
campus at this time are recorded from the presidents office,
Our one-year trial of the new governance systemhas gone fairly well. It is
apparent, however, that is consumes time voraciously and that is has compounded
more than it has clarified the widespread confusion about authority, responsibility,
and accountabilityAdministration is unquestionably more difficult in the new
system in every way I can measure -President Martin in a report to the trustees,
June 1972.
Presidents and administrators found their hands tied during a time in which
faculty and students were determined to bring about politically and socially hostile
changes in their roles in the name of increased freedom and participation. It is important
to note from the close of this section is that college governmental changes and reforms
mirrored those felt on a national level and occurred alongside a cultural reform. It was a
movement that demanded the institutional leadership abandon the traditional stance of
22
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
23/73
moral guardians over student life and to vest its hope instead in increased tolerance,
dialogue and participation among all the stakeholders.
Never the less the question for these institutions still remained: would such a move
still preserve our identity and purpose? Who or what would fill the gap? At the time of
Millets writing, he did not foresee that most campuses fell short or fell back from
complete open participatory models, although he did comment that a major weakness of
this experimental model would be an abandonment of faculty and student senates outside
the all college senate (which Union never did, although we did abolish our all college
senate). The constant state of action, crises and reform in the 1960s and early 1970s
made it difficult for a necessary consensus to evolve into a system that could successfully
take the place of the original authority figures.
IV:The modern liberal arts college: The rise of student affairs and the
abandonment of facultyIn Loco Parentis roles.
By the 1980s, student movement within academic institutions had begun to roll
back. Helen Horowitz, in her book Campus Life, uses the examples of the killings at Kent
State University and Jackson State College in May of 1970 as a means to prove that
college students had indeed expressed a level of political unrest that had reached a
23
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
24/73
breaking point. Such events drew national attention, forcing the greater public to question
the social and political security and management of many of these institutions. When
tragedies, like those mentioned by Horowitz occur the institution itself must also re-
examine their current state of governance at that time.
John Millet, in his section titled The Future of Academic Governance,
highlights just how important effective management is for these institutions. Yet, prior to
being able to successfully reform or even administer sound policies back into these
colleges and universities, Millet states that there are basic grounding principles that must
be recognized an upheld in order to obtain such reform. First, Millet notes that academic
institutions are not a debating society, a legislative assembly or a recreational center.
Secondly, these institutions were enterprises established as a means for which one
could learn, as means to further improve ones self so as to positively effect a greater
community. Finally, Millet notes that during this time of social unrest and reform, there
was little communication and discussion of the successful application of campus wide
governance. Thus, if colleges wanted positive reform they would need to create a
structured political system that would be engaged in articulating and maintaining a
dialogue of campus wide governance (Millet, 258).
Millet defines fundamental ground rules for change, however, these ground rules
become difficult to apply to colleges for most find that their academic, social and political
networks have become so interdependent on the consensus with one another, such reform
24
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
25/73
easily escalates into a tedious challenge. For example, the learning process that often
occurs within a student residential environment and how this is managed should also
dictate the residential life and cultural values. What is an evident change being managed
effectively by our small institutions in theperception of quality of a elite, residential,
liberal arts learning experience. Less and less was this measured in the quality of the
degree a college produced, but rather how many prospective students and their parents
desired that degree and the price they were willing to pay for it. Colleges in line with
Millets emphasis on production, saw liberal education as a marketable product to
dispense. The size of the market determined the schools selectivity, and the level of
selectivity determined that institutions elite stature, and it is that stature which became a
hallmark of quality.
In regards to how a college fits into the market against its competitors, selectivity,
among other factors, is probably the most commonly used element in determining a
colleges degree of elite-ness in its identity. The fact that so many of these institutions
have been able to survive and even prosper during several decades of massive expansion
of low-cost public higher education can only be attributed to the belief among many
prospective students and their parents that small, private, residential liberal arts college do
in fact provide benefits not likely to be found in any other institution they compete with
for students and faculty.
25
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
26/73
One unique aspect that elite liberal arts colleges find have practical value in an
admissions and marketing sense is the fringe benefits of a degree from their particular
institution. Meaning, these elite institutions act a means for one to further their
educational and social life, as well as lay the foundation for career advantages are
associated with having a degree from these particular institutions (Astin, 80). The highly
selective or elite liberal arts college has a perceived advantage in quality on account of its
superior learning environment.
Hugh Hawkins, a Professor of History and American Studies at Amherst College,
wrote on The Making of the Liberal Arts College Identity how the private liberal arts
education was marketed more and more in providing a substantial increase in earning
power. No one could recall when careerism had been so power in liberal arts college.
My folks want to know what I can do if I major in your department? was a question
often heard. Between 1970 and 1987, the proportion of entering students who claimed
their goal for coming to school was a goal of being very well-off financially rose from
39 to 76 percent (Hawkins, 23). One of the most dramatic changes in college students
during the past three decades has been an increase on their materialistic values (Astin,
86).
In Astins conclusion, most of the effects of the private liberal arts college are
indirect. These environmental influences are what affects the community most, not the
26
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
27/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
28/73
the community. The cultural wars and reforms of the 1960s and 70s, greatly stirred the
moral character of students, faculty, and administrators. The students became more
empowered and experimental forms of democratic government were implemented during
this time period.
The policy changes that occurred during the 1980s and 1990s created a need for
the residential liberal arts college community to address questions facing the institutions
sense of civility and community. Though these factors impacted the structures of campus
power through history, the mission the residential community continued to draw from
remained more or less the same. The mission of the college, to train students to become
balanced, ethical leaders and change the world in which we live, remained constant even
in the face of cultural change. Unions coming of age and maturing politically indicates
our campus was influenced by the same historical trends. In the second chapter well
examine, Union through its unique history and how that has governed the politics of the
decision makers of our college.
A case study proving this will be the U2K committee as a relationship model on
how successful policy should be implemented on a campus to maintain quality and
prestige coming into the 21st
century. This is evidenced by the charge given to this
committee composed of influential members of the faculty, students, and administration.
It is stated in the first passages of the committees proposal for Residential and Social
Life at Union. The aim of the committee was, To propose a set of reforms that would
28
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
29/73
preserve the traditions of Greek life that are consistent with an academic community that
values open inquiry, seriousness of purpose, diversity of opinion, and a broad, equitable
choice of residential and social options.
The following historical and political analysis reveals how the U2K committee
constituted a microcosm of the most effective style of policy formation in a private,
residential, liberal arts college setting like ours. It involved some of the dedicated and
influential minds and leaders from all three camps, bringing them together in a
community of open discourse, serious inquiry and trusting relations and produced
forward thinking ideas that will change the higher education community both here and
around the nation. Indeed that is the only types of influence relationship that have
worked at colleges and it is exactly what happened with U2K and why the fertile ground
was laid for the idea and ideals behind the Minervas to take root and grow today.
29
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
30/73
CHAPTER TWO
The Garnet Revolution: A historical study and political analysis on
causes of the U2K Crises
There are two camps at Union, although not every person fits neatly into one or the
other. One camp ardently believes that the Greek system is a benefit to the campus, and
the other sees it as a detriment.
-Preliminary Report of the U2K Committee
The Garnet Revolution describes the latest in a series of progressive steps to
transform Union within the changing politics of the nation at large. While we cannot go
back to those turbulent days where the compromises and innovations originated, we can,
30
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
31/73
in this next chapter analyze the events which shaped the viewpoints of the separate camps
at this time so we may make more informed strategic policies in the present day.
In the years leading up to the Garnet Revolution, a culture war existed between
those who wanted change and those who did not. Specifically, it marked a constant
debate between the social cohort who had taken up residence in many Greek houses in
recent years and the faculty who taught there and the serious, intellectually focused
students of its day.
There were three distinct phases of political action during this time. First, was the
facultys resolution to move the Greeks to a sophomore rush and form a committee to
address the increasingly anti-intellectual social atmosphere growing there. The second
phase, coupled with the inability of the established governmental structure to produce a
cohesive plan to ensure the security of intellectual culture on the campus on their own,
was President Hull deciding to bring all the leaders of the three camps under one
committee dubbed, the U2K committee. The work of this committee was instrumental in
influencing the chain of events to formulate a new social policy to recommend to the
Board of Trustees. The third phase of actions occurred within the U2K committee as all
three parties, the faculty, students, and administrators discussed, debated, and built
consensus.
Amidst these challenges facing a modern campus, the students and the faculty
shared something closely in common when it came to the new order that was taking
31
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
32/73
shape within the decay of the old social system: both were engaged on campus in a
passionate quest for relevance. Both of their roles and purposes were in varying degrees
of identity crisis and looked to their leaders serving on the U2K committee for signs of
hope.
Before we begin, its important to clear up one of the most common
misconceptions of these events of the not so distant past which is the belief that the
formation of the recommendations of the U2K committee were part of an administrative
conspiracy to get rid of fraternities at Union College. Proponents of this view should note
following a serious examination of the reports and personal testimonies from those
involved revealed the opposite was true. U2K was, in all reality, nothing less an attempt
by certain members of the faculty, students, and administration on the behalf of the future
members of the college to save the best aspects of the Greek system here at Union that
was achieved despite great personal risk for all those involved in the controversial
endeavor.
To illustrate what the alternatives to reform were, Ill share the answers I received
from one of the interview questions that I asked most of the faculty and administrators
involved in my research which went, What do you expect would have happened had
President Hull not formed the U2K committee and sophomore rush was not enacted?
Alan Taylor, professor of mathematics and a U2K committee member told me, Oh
faculty would have done away with fraternities, Taylor said confidently, "again, were
32
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
33/73
talking influence. We have enough influence to do it. Theres no doubt in my mind in
terms of exerting influence in the administration and the board, you cant have the whole
faculty unhappy, nope. President Hull probably would have gone away during the
process; it would have been a serious thing (Taylor, 2007).
When I met with Dean Leavitt, the current Dean of students he echoed this
assessment of what was at stake, I suspect that the faculty would have forced the issue.
They would have ended up coming together and putting a resolution down for the
administration to take a final stand on the future of Greek Life at the college. That was
the way it was headed. It was headed for a showdown as to whether we were gonna keep
Greek life. And by that time I think there really were faculty who were committed to
seeing this through. So in a sense, what the President was trying to do was stave that
off. I pressed Dean Leavitt further and asked what he predicted would happen if the
President would not do something about the Greek dominated social system. What would
the faculty have to do? He answered, Well, you organize a vote of no-confidence in the
President. The idea is that theyd sort of take a stand against the administration with the
Board of Trustees that theyre so dissatisfied that they want a change. And that has
happened in the past.
Dan Lundquist, as the longest serving senior administrator on the Presidents
cabinet and as Dean of Admissions and Communications for the college, also shared with
33
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
34/73
me his predictions on what the alternative was to change: Its possible that the faculty
wouldnt have let the issue drop and they would have pushed it and pushed it until a
compromise might have been cut off and the issue might have gotten so volatile and so
hot that it might have ended the existence of Greeks. If the energy hadnt been shunted
off into the U2K and the house system, it probably would have just continued to fester and
I dont know how long it would have been sustained.
And finally, our new Dean of Campus Life, Tom McEvoy shared his predictions
on how different todays campus might be had it not been for the decisions made in those
crucial years, I think Union would really be risking its reputation as one of the more
selective colleges in the country. I think if the college had not taken stock of itself of
where it was at that moment in history and instead said, its gonna be status quo, I think
you would have had a student body that had flattened out in its potentialI think the
college would have been in a major funk.
Ive always believed that if you dont change, youre doomedI would doubt that
the college would be a major player right nowI doubt we would have attracted Steven
Ainley who cited the housing system as one of the reasons he cameI know I wouldnt be
here, thats for sure.
The question that follows is, on a modern liberal arts campus how was an issue
allowed to reach a high level of polarization within the community that the campus was
34
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
35/73
quickly approaching a crises? An analysis of the formative events and relations that
preceded the movement provides insight into the role of Unions history dating back
almost two centuries in defining the forces giving rise to U2K.
The evolution of the Greek system at Union:
Helen Lefkowitz Horowitz in her book, Campus Life, described the foundation of
Greek societies as the students political response to the repressive stance that was
common in many early colleges towards life outside the classroom. Horowitz attests to
the vision of our earliest alumni in starting this dynamic movement emerging as a general
trend in the organization of student culture.
In 1825 Union College was growing into the largest college in the nation. Its
student body reflected the range of its region, drawing the sons of upstate New York
Aristocrats along with the young men from the country and the new frontier towns. A few
prominent students confirmed their friendship by adopting the name Kappa Alpha,
choosing the watch key as an emblem, and surrounding the society in vaguely Masonic
ritual. By 1840 fraternities had spread to most New England Colleges and would take
solid root in the Midwest before 1850 (Horowitz, 29).
35
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
36/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
37/73
friendships, and loyalty to their alma mater were cultivated. The students and alumni of
the fraternities donated flagpoles to the school, gates to Jacksons Gardens, and instituted
in their private curriculum that taught social etiquette and style alongside the mandated
learning and singing of songs about Old Union, expressing their fond love and gratitude
to their home, the mother of all fraternities.
One of the chief supporters of the fraternities during the first half of the 19th
century were, in fact, the faculty members themselves, with at least one professor belong
to each house as an advisor along with mutually beneficial socializing after class. Happy
to see their students fed, trained and nurtured into leadership positions and taught to be
life loyal alums, the higher education community was happy to lend support to these
institutions as the college campus matured and grew. The major conventional power that
many of the fraternities (and later sororities developed) was an interstate network of
undergraduates and alumni across the country which soon formed into Grand Chapters
and national councils that could govern and coordinate the expansion, rules, and rituals of
the chapters. Large fraternities like Sigma Chi, a member of the Union Community since
1923, have grown to over 200 chapters and quarter million members, including alumni.
Taken collectively, Greek letter societies can take pride in being included among of a
roster of fraternal alumni that could make most of their host institutions blush with envy.
For over a century and a half, fraternities existed at Union in this way,
withstanding the ravages of time and change and increasingly becoming so important and
37
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
38/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
39/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
40/73
the 1960s and the death ofin Loco Parentis in the early 1970s, allowing their students
the ability to grow up during a time when the definition of what grown up at college
was supposed to be was no longer easily defined.Therefore, the Union students who
became Greeks, in the absence of suitable guidance and incentive to do otherwise, took
their lessons from whatever campus role models that were to be found among the
upperclassmen and alumni who stayed connected with the chapters. Students who were
responsible for a lot of the negative activities also learned that what was legal or illegal
did not determine right or wrong on the campus when it came to the social life as many of
the students have not properly been engaged by faculty in intimate conversations about
life outside the classroom. While attempting to allow young adults distance to
experimentation with different modes of living, to try out ideas and insights free of adult
domination, the faculty had moved from a developmentally healthy distancing to a
developmentally detrimental virtual abandonment (William & Naylor 88).
It is not clear to this day if the school ever built consensus on the trajectory of
their Greek organizations they had fostered for so long would take after going co-ed.
While heirs to an impressive legacy and network of resources, most Greek leaders have
proved either unable or unwilling to translate these terrific opportunities and resources to
proactive ends for their chapters advancement and continued survival of a quality
standard on campus. Proper standards of quality programming never appeared to be
40
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
41/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
42/73
logistically by the faculty and administration. The Greek system at Union College was
gradually becoming a system without direction.
By the 1990s, with the student affairs office and residential life eclipsing their
historical pre-eminency and the faculty and alumni distancing themselves from
organizations, the houses and their societies that received the next generation of
unassuming Union students were isolated from external support as the quality of their
membership became compromised by students who had little interest or incentive to run
against the grain of the social system that had evolved over the past 30-40 years. The three
main houses left in the middle of campus were the last of over a dozen mansions on the
campus grounds and in the adjoining neighborhoods that had either been sold, shut down,
torn down, or just plain abandoned in the past two decades. By 1996, the Delta Phi house,
home to Unions second oldest fraternity was boarded up. It needed a million dollars in
repairs to be saved from being condemned. On the other side a campus, the porch of the
Alpha Delta Phi house, which had for years overlooked Payne Gate, the traditional
entrance to the campus, was ready to collapse. Those freshman that entered these lonely
buildings as pledges in 1998 had no idea that they were among the last cohorts of a
residential system that had dominated the social skyline of the campus for over a century
and a half and would soon be returning to the fringes of campus from whence it came.
What the remaining fraternities came to lack in physical stature during this time,they more than made up for in influence on the minds of many students who seek a
42
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
43/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
44/73
The dominance of this type of institutionalized persona was not the only dispute
that faculty had with the Greek societies on campus. Their relations had come
increasingly strained due to several factors. Even though the administration supported
these parties open to most everyone by allowing their students to host them with little
penalty for underage drinking, there was still dispute over the selectivity of the
organizations themselves, the strategically centralized location in which this all was going
on, and there was the lingering aspect of hazing and abuse that, if and when it surfaced on
a college campus, would be splashed across national headlines. Professor Taylor, looking
back, remarked how this behavior was observed by the faculty at Union, It was a huge
thingwe could pretend it wasnt there but it wasonce the awareness came up, people
said, What are we thinking? Come on, this is the 1990s.Meanwhile on Unions
campus, in its smaller yet more concentrated form, fraternity and sorority pledges were
showing up in teachers classrooms reeking of alcohol or smelling from not being able to
bathe during certain pledge periods.
Dean Leavitt shared these examples with me as reasons for faculty building
consensus against the status quo. The biggest complaint that you were hearing was the
pledging process was just plain interfering too much with students academics and it was
going on during the first year that they were here when students were taking these
44
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
45/73
required courses, like freshman precept. So there was this concentrated effect at certain
times of the year when you know, a lot of them were zoned out, He said jokingly.
The other thing, there is always an element in the faculty that feels that Greek
organizations, because of their selectivity, their exclusiveness tend to be kind of elitist
and to select certain types of people. The I only wanna be with people who share my
values, kind of feeling And it goes against a lot of the values faculty try to promote
these are all based on stereotypes of course, but I think a lot of those stereotypes were
there (Leavitt, 2007).
Lack of discretion and oversight on the part of the organizations who sponsored
this behavior among their members actually resulted in many pledges proudly telling
their professors that they were late or missed their classes due to a pledge event, much in
the same fashion that a varsity athlete might ask to be excused for an athletic obligation.
Something that characterizes most academic communities, Dean Lundquist said
to me while discussing faculty attitudes towards the Greek-members, I call it the itch
that cant be scratched, that professors are professional question-askers, I think its gotta
be a challenge for men and women who are professional intellectuals to see American
adolescent kids regardless of their GPAs, acting out. While Lundquist is not a faculty
member himself, his years of experience leading Unions admissions program has brought
him up-close and personal with many facets of Unions academic community and our
45
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
46/73
peer institutions. He went on to say, I gotta believe that there are people who have
devoted their lives to their disciplines, and if theyre in the wrong mood, what an insult to
have someone coming in with a hangover or falling asleep in class and I think that rightly
or wrongly that the frats got tagged as the bad guy. Lundquist stated with some
sympathy, Whether or not anybody liked fraternities or not, because undergraduate
fraternities were and are the locus of underage drinking, whether they deserved it more
than kids getting a six-pack on the floor at West College. In the court of public opinion
at Union College and elsewhere, fraternities were easy piatas to hit,and so they did.
Whether in perception or reality, it was embarrassing for the faculty to be shown
up by these social clubs. It seemed that within a matter of months from stepping on
campus, a freshman and eventually sophomore male could have more influence on the
students minds than the faculty. These could become very challenging and eventually
threatening factors to a faculty member who has dedicated their life to the profession.
Steve Leavitt, was a former professor of Anthropology at Union and described his
perspective on the faculty versus the social situation in this way, The faculty dynamic
has to do with the quality of their life. The quality of their life has to do with whether or
not they have chosen for their life mission something that makes a difference. So for
them, having an impact on their students is a way for them to make a difference in the
world. Therefore, the students need to regard what the faculty does as central to why
46
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
47/73
theyre here. And anything that takes away from that, that you are not a central part of
our life, makes faculty very anxious. Cause theyre like, to be totally flippant about it,
Why have I decided to devote my life to a bunch of spoiled brats who want to waste their
life partying away so that they can get their Union degree so that I make no difference. I
dont have any impact on them. What a waste of my life. So its a visceral thing with
faculty. In fairness to the poor beleaguered Union students, I think a lot of faculty think
that they do make a big difference, and a lot of students say that. So I dont think the
overall situation is really that bad(Leavitt, 2007).
For many professors, though, enough was enough. In the spring of 1998, leaders
in the faculty senate accused the Greeks of being detrimental to the intellectual life of
freshmen students and proposed a vote that passed almost unanimously for a movement to
sophomore rush. The Student Affairs Council, the leading policy body on student affairs
composed of a student-majority membership, received the recommendation from the
faculty and rejected it in a 5-4 vote. The issue was defeated by the very governance
structure the faculty had designed several years before. Not to be deterred, several
professors threatened they would take effective action to abolish the Greek system and
those who harbored it from campus if the schools leadership did not take action to set
things right. Professor Taylor assured me that the faculty were not in any sense backed
into a corner by the split SAC vote sending back their recommendation for sophomore
47
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
48/73
rush. I think what people didnt realize is it was fragile enough that if even nudged
slightly, the faculty were on the verge of saying, this is the end of the Greek system, this
is it. Yeah, the Greek system came very close to disappearing at that time. Faculty
attitudes and perspectives are succinctly captured in the concluding passage that was
published at the end of the summer in 1998 by a committee formed by the president to
look into the growing controversy:
Union has many proud and long standing traditions. In 2000 Kappa Alpha will
celebrate its 175th anniversary, a milestone that surpasses the founding date of most
American colleges. However, there is one Union tradition that is older, and far more
important. For 203 years Union has been shaping minds and characters by bringing
together cohorts of bright, capable students and a gifted faculty. Through exposure to one
another, to important books and ideas, and to a regimen of scholarly discipline, we have
sustained an outstanding academic enterprise. However, these two traditions - Greek life
and the educational and developmental imperatives of the College - now appear to be at
odds and must be reconciled. During one of the open debates, a student gave a litany of
good things fraternities do, and inquired in a Rodney Dangerfield manner, 'Why can't we
get respect?' A wag in the audience retorted, 'Why can't you be respectable?' Neither got
it entirely right, but the example shows both how close and far the two sides are from one
48
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
49/73
another. We believe that this community working together can bridge the
gap.(Conclusion: Report from the Committee on Sophomore Rush August 27, 1998 )
Dean Leavitt, when I interviewed him, made it clear that by not initiating an
Greek-led solution to the matter, the students at Union at the time had internationalized
the conflict and brought college intervention (especially in the form of U2K
recommendations) into the heart of the Greek system. Not only that, but lack of
discretion with activities that involved hazing or underage drinking in their organizations
had made college leaders appear weak and foolish for trusting them. Therefore, their
behavior alienated the people whose opinions in the higher education community
President Hull and the Board of Trustees relied on most, this was a contributing factor to
why the students who were Greek members and their supporters were not prepared to
prevent the intervention. One can see here in the continued presence of relatively
unsupervised parties, and the continuation of non-discrete hazing practices that the nature
of campus life can still be described as being governed by self-help. Without
deterrence or mentorship, students entering and learning on Unions campus become
disconnected from the influence of the intellectual mission of the college.
The Administrations Perspective on the U2K decision:
49
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
50/73
Gathering Consensus and Building Trust
If Union is to move to the next level of excellence, we must change the social
culture at the College. Although many might argue that fraternities should be eliminated,
as have several colleges with which we compete, I believe that it is not the existence of
fraternities that harms Union, but their dominance. Simply stated, fraternities, in my
judgment, can be a part of Union's fabric in the future, but they should not be the force on
campus that they have been for the past 175 years.
-Roger Hull to the Members of the Board of Trustees, October 26, 2000
As one can see from President Hulls remarks, the problem was not to determine
whether the situation that the Greek houses were involved in should be addressed, but
rather would the college, in an attempt to undue the mistakes of past policy makers, get
wrapped up an a contentious crises that could destroy relationships on campus.
President Hull called on Dean Alford and others to form a special committee to
look into the committee on sophomore rushs recommendations on the future of social
life on campus in an entirely new and separate committee that could eventually report to
the trustees directly. Student government organizations, namely the Pan-Hellenic Council
for the Sororities and the Inter-Fraternity Council were asked to pick their representatives
50
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
51/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
52/73
to actually deal with the social problem. So, everybody is manipulating everybody else
(Alford, 2007).
Fear and assumptions are effective levers of influence when the campus
leadership is disconnected from a definite set of campus values. When this is the case
with our college leadership, we can hardly be surprised when administrators of a
community without a well-defined sense of direction, can be easily be influenced by
students, alumni, and powerful faculty (William & Naylor, 59).
Also influencing the administrations decisions, as it had in past crises with
Union, were the national trends taking place across Americas system of higher education.
These were issues of rising competition, apathy among students and many alums, and
increasingly uncontrollable flows of information and media coverage where perception of
one stakeholder becomes the reality for another.
Fred Alford, Unions Dean of Students at the time, commented on the influence of
these perceptions on the direction of policy, Another thing that was in the fertilizer of all
of this was the notion that-heres this good little college thats ranked, I dont know, #38
in the U.S. News and World Report. I think its better than that; most everybody thought
it was better than that. There are notions of self-esteem and ambition rolled up and this,
but it was about, How is Union going to develop the respect it deserves in the larger
academic community? And the U.S. News and World Report is one of those things that
52
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
53/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
54/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
55/73
Suzie Benack, from Psychology. Representing the Greeks were Kate Stephanik, Noah
Truger, Matt Barry and others that appeared throughout or served on sub-committees.
The members of the U2K committee included leaders chosen by the Greeks to represent
them and the committee had gained the blessings of the President, the Dean of Students,
the Dean of Faculty as well. What follows is a brief overview of the models governing
these decision makers surrounding the U2K discussions and their policy formation.
At the beginning, there didnt seem like any way they were gonna be on the same
page, Allen Taylor a faculty representative on the U2K Committee told me in our
interview. In debating their options, some professors on the U2K committee were
pessimistic You absolutely could not go into the 21st
century with the castles in the
center of campus-reserved males. I could picture bringing my daughter on campus and
pointing to those buildings and saying, well, those are residences, but you cant ever live
in them.As Ive said before, she would have had a quick, two-word answer for me
(Taylor, 2007). The students on the committee, through serious discussion and debate,
made sure that the faculty and administrators they worked with realized which policy
actions would, in their opinion, kill the Greek chapters on Unions campus.
Alan Taylor recalled the unifying effect that all the hard introspection and
association had on the committee as it matured, It was a long time building up the trust,
as it should have been. In the end, you really had a group that was not just looking at
55
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
56/73
what was happening now, but looking 25 years ahead when the faculty would be retired
and the students would have long graduated and saying, we have to do whats best. This
is not really going to be affecting us as individuals. I have enormous respect for them,
especially for the students.
During the debate on what to do next, they made sure that they outline the goals to
achieve on campus. The three that were decided upon were:
1.) A need for the Greek system to disassociate itself from the supporters of
regressive activities i.e. those groups of students that engage in alcohol abuse
and hazing.
2.) Gender equity in housing and equal access to social space.
3.) A need for faculty to participate more in out-of class intellectual life of the
campus and administrative support to make this happen.
The Fred Alford decided that their first objective was to come up with an
alternative that would provide for all three. I was looking to do something to stir-up, to
break this monolith that is the Greek dominance of the social life there. I was looking for
it, and a lot of faculty members were looking for it(Alford, 2007). This alternative was,
in very rough terms, the original idea for the Minerva Housing System in effect on
campus today. Dean Alford briefed the committee on a scenario, which would involve
moving almost every fraternity out of stand-alone housing and establishing a new
56
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
57/73
residential system within the old buildings with equal access to every member of the
Union learning community. As a feeling of mutual respect developed among all the
representatives, the work to develop the recommendation represented in some ways the
physical embodiment and in some ways the programmatic embodiment of the way that a
residential college ideal defines undergraduate education as having a curricular and co-
curricular part. The steering committee met on a weekly basis and also got to socialize
together at Fred Alfords home as equal participants in a of serious discourse and
exchange of ideas on how to better the community in which they lived.
The best policy for social and residential reform was obviously not easy to agree
upon, however, considering the unpopularity of change among many influential students
connected to the U2K members. The faculty members and administration had to muster
all of their finesse on the committee to compromise with student leaders in government
that they would need- and should accept the committees proposal if Greek organizations
were to have any sort of future on Unions campus. There was a student, Noah Truger,
Dean Alford explained, Noah was a Psi U brother and it was a very difficult thing for
him because fraternities demand a lot of loyalty. He was the president of Psi U and he
understood that if the Greek system was going to survive at Union then this was probably
the smartest thing for him to do.
57
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
58/73
Kate Stephanick called how all the members of the committee, though coming
from different perspectives and fields of experience on the campus, were united over time
around their belief in the value their recommendations would bring to the school.
It was demanding of all of us, Kate recalled, I joke with people that I met my
husband on the committee, that wasnt coincidentalwe together constantly and we were
kind of bonded in a wayand the faculty were dealing with criticism from fellow faculty
members too because they were afraid that not enough was going to change, that this was
all going to some big sham where you appoint a committee and nothing changes. So, we
were all kind of bonded in that I think(Stephanick, 2007).
It was this conviction that lead to almost all of the leaders present to signing and
adopting the recommendations of the U2K committee. In the fall of 2000, the U2K
committee published their preliminary report in the Concordy that stunned the campus
community. It called for almost every remaining fraternal mansion to be turned over to
the college to make way for the largest social change on campus since the college went
coed about 30 years before. The entire committee then presented itself before the Board
of Trustees and answered their questions regarding the situation at hand. Kate Stephanik
and her colleagues detailed the proceedings of the committee over the past three years.
On the 26th of October, Roger Hull addressed the members of the Board of
Trustees as he endorsed U2Ks recommendation.
58
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
59/73
During the past 10 years, we have transformed this campus and our environs
dramatically; we have broadened and expanded significantly our academic programs; we
have addressed a variety of technological and educational challenges; and we have met
our admissions and financial goals. While beginning to create social options for students,
though, we remain locked socially in a nineteenth century model. It is time to create the
model for the twenty first century. Just as 30 years ago, alumni argued that coeducation
would ruin Union; so today some alumni will make the same argument with regard to this
proposal. It did not take 30 years to prove critics of coeducation wrong, and it will not
take 30 years to do so with regards to the U2K recommendations.
Back on campus, the students strongly opposed the new plan. People were acting
like the Greek system was being eliminated and then that the whole system was rigged,
Kate expressed to me, I mean, no one was questioning our participation on the
committee prior to the report, but once it didnt say what they wanted it to saypeople
were just grasping at strawsthe faculty had to compromise much more on the committee
than the students did.
The Board of Trustees formed a special committee to review the U2K. Pressed
against a corner, the IFC and Pan-Hellenic Council responded with a recommendation of
their own for reform within the social system. Apparently, it was too little too late.
During the final days of the U2K crises, the more moderate chapters were scrambling to
59
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
60/73
forestall the conflict with a flurry of phone calls from alumni to the President, personal
visits from alumni, and angry opinion editorials in the Concordy. The U2K committee
was receptive and supportive.
The students had an incredibly strong voice, Kate recalled in our interview,
And that was the part that was so frustrating was that once that all this came out and
people saw that fraternities were going to be moving out of their houses, I mean the
Greek system ended up dodging a huge bullet because of the students on the committee.
Compared to what could have happened, what was happening at other schools and what
was on the table, this was a very minor change, certainly yes, a big change for Unionwe
managed to keep the Greek system exactly the same except for a few moving from their
residences.
Around the same time that the U2K committee had committed its plan to the
Board of Trustees, student protest became widespread on the campus. Kate and Noah
took the beating most because they were the head of the Greek system and the Greek
system felt that they had sold out the Greeks somehow where in point of fact theysaved
the Greek system! Professor Taylor stated emphatically, If it were not for them the
Greek system on the campus would be long gone right now. The realization that their
situation was desperate was evident in their proposal as well as the current leaderships
willingness to reform in a bid to forestall losing exclusive ownership over the three
60
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
61/73
mansions that their organizations were housed in, was evident in the sweeping proposals
presented.
To President Hull, the U2K committee, and eventually the Board of Trustees, the
unhealthy dynamic of party politics among the current houses was unacceptable and
there was no evidence from the preceding months from the IFC or Pan-Hellenic Council
leaders that they could reason with the undergraduate members currently living in the
Greek chapters on their own. Collective and institutional action had to be taken. The
Board of Trustees and the President himself had made it clear that they would not accept
the status quo as it was now. Historical precedence was not enough for any institutions
survival on campus. This reality applied to the academic divisions as well. Engineering,
for example, underwent substantial change.
Throughout our work, we have been guided by one principle ... to determine the
best course of action that will allow Union College to be among the nation's most highly
rated and respected liberal arts colleges. To achieve this, Union must attract premier
students and faculty, which in turn requires that it provide top-notch facilities and
programs and a cultural environment that nourishes intellectual pursuit and academic
excellence as well as a fulfilling social life.
Union College Board of Trustees
61
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
62/73
Despite what students might have thought at the time, the current nature of the
social life outside the classroom was a vital interest to the stakeholders of Union College,
from the professors, to the Deans to the Board of Trustees. The Chairman of the Board
reviewed the report on the current state of campus life and concluded that a new
committee would be appointed to determine the outcome of the recommendation.
However, if this committee was in favor of keeping Greek life a part of the campus they
must prove how Greek life was an asset to the college. The Report of the Board of
Trustees Special Committee on Student Social Life and Housing, once published, made
it clear that in order to remain competitive, the culture of the campus had to change. The
judgments of the committee, accurately identified the key vehicles of influence and
persuasion related to student social life that block Union being better-perceived among
the most highly-regarded liberal arts colleges in the United States:
*Virtually all Union social life seems to revolve around alcohol; though three-
quarters of our students are not of legal drinking age, alcohol is easy to come by and
largely unsupervised within the fraternities that host parties and other gatherings; in
view of this, it is not hard to understand how other social activities have difficulty taking
root; the consequence is a very one-dimensional social scene, especially among
underclassmen, that excludes those who don't wish to participate and precludes
alternatives;
62
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
63/73
*There is considerable evidence that the party scene interferes with intellectual
pursuit and academic achievement of many students; cultural norms and peer pressures
exist that discourage 'intellectualism,' particularly outside the classroom and in social
settings;
*Many students indicate they wish the social scene were different, but do not
(or do not know how to) mobilize to change it; they don't seem to realize how many others
feel similarly; there is a sense of powerlessness to change things;
*We (the administration, the faculty, trustees, parents) have accepted the heavy
drinking paradigm of current students as a given of 'modern' college life as if we are
helpless, sending the message that we don't care enough about our kids . . . or our college
. . . to strive for something better.
(Report of the Board of Trustees' Special Committee on Student Social Life and
Housing, Feb. 15th, 2001)
In 2001, the Board of Trustees published The Plan for Union, which would be an
official school policy approach to reforming and strengthening the quality of residential
and social life on campus. Steve Leavitt, Dean of Students, described the influence these
competitive values have on administrative policy, Ultimately what were all caring for
here is an institution of higher learning. Thats what its all about. And we pride
ourselves as being one of the better ones in the country. And we are all committing our
63
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
64/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
65/73
kind of place it is, how new ideas are accepted and put into practice, how one makes
his/her needs known and how easy it is for someone to have his/her needs met, what is
seen, heard, and felt by people who are part of the community, the feeling that parents,
prospective students, and faculty candidates get when they visit and, at a deeper level,
what these sorts of things imply about Union's values, about what is encouraged and
discouraged, and about what is neglected or overlooked. As a consequence, while our
required judgments are focused primarily on Greek life and the proposals of U2K for a
house system, this report will offer some observations and recommendations that might
seem at first glance to be beyond the scope of our charge. We see them as being all of one
piece, for the real issue is the nature of Union's social systems and their relationship to
the mission and purposes of the College.
-Report of the Board of Trustee Special Committee on Student Social Life and Housing,
2001
Over the months that followed, a House Implementation Committee was then to
be formed and staffed with many of the most dedicated professors involved in U2K and
included some of the finest young minds entering the institution following the proposal.
A new Dean of Residential Life was hired to spearhead the implementation and shepard
the fledgling movement, Dean McEvoy. The Minervas, as the house system would come
be known as, was hailed as one of the most innovative movements coming out of higher
65
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
66/73
education today, and would eventually be written in the Chronicle of Higher Education as
one of the boldest attempts of an institution to refine itself in the 21st century.
CONCLUSION
In review of the material presented in my research, three different models are
available in judging how a college like Union governs itself. The nature of the people
involved, the nature of the organizations involved, or the nature of the relationships
between stakeholders involved.
In the first model, those who would hold the type of student, faculty, or
administrator as the principle source of political behavior would then naturally conclude
that a higher quality of student or faculty are the most essential to achieving the type of
66
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
67/73
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
68/73
more radical, rogue chapters operating out of small houses on Seward place and Alpha
chapters operating out of stately mansions, a few with thousands held in trust in the bank
by some dedicated alumni alongside quality weekly programming and organization.
There were also chapters that operated effectively out of the basements of Fox and
Davidson, some were dry, and some were wet up to their ears. There are multi-cultural,
co-educational, and non-residential Greek organizations, although small in number, that
function healthily on campus. These organizations were never designed to be completely
uniform and there were many who did not stand alongside each other in opposition to
reform.
This period of time in Unions history shows exactly why the nature relationships
as the system of governance over academic and extracurricular life is a fundamental cause
of conflict. For so long, the academic community at Union attempted to educate in the
absence of consensus, or even arguments about consensus. Ultimately, this analysis
concludes that the most effective political model for Union is vested in a combination of
three systems or models: the nature of the individual, the nature of the department or
organization, and the nature relationships governed by the institutions value system;
eventually reveals that the most universally consistent model for explaining the source of
crises on our campus the acute lack a universally accepted system of values to incentives
consensus on campus issues.
68
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
69/73
This is not to say that the nature of individual quality among campus members
and their organizations or interest groups are rejected outright in this theory. All three
models interact with one another. Therefore, while the nature of the individuals and the
nature of the organizations on campus may be the immediate cause of crises on campus,
the structure of the campus community centering on the overall mission and value system
is the underlying origin of conflict on this campus. All sides failed to accurately relate to
the other.
The affects of this lesson on policy formation are summed up in The Abandoned
Generation: An institutions purpose changes in subtle, unstated ways. Change is often
necessary for an institution to survive in a changed world, but that change ought to be
intentional and openly discussedThe absence of an explicit, functioning educational
philosophy implies a certain lack of discipline on the part of the faculty and senior
administration, a lack of commitment to a specific set of principles. This lack of
commitment soon becomes obvious to new faculty members, students, and nonacademic
employees. Such an institution is easily manipulated by competitors, students, and
alumni (William & Naylor, 62).
In evaluating their actions to reform the school, the administrations strategy of
appealing to the Union students in societies to reform themselves while allowing the
current social arrangement to continue had not worked due to a more immediate
69
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review & Analysis
70/73
perceived pay-off from partying that outweighs reform. There might be those who, in
hindsight, would claim that the administration and faculty, in their attempt to reduce the
dominance of the fraternity system, had in fact failed to remove the dominance of their
party politics because they attempted a legislative solution rather than a relational
solution in a co-curricular sense.
While the U2K committees open forums, publications, and participation leading
up to the recommendation before the Board of Trustees were procedurally correct the
faculty and college officials did not have an adequate understanding of the circumstance
of the higher education system that the current Greek-member student and his cohorts
saw themselves in. The average student coming Unions campus at that time and their
understanding of their role in the institutional mission or lack thereof was the direct result
of the disconnected nature of individuals and their organizations here. Nothing better
illustrates the compartmentalization that has occurred in college and universities than
the separation that exists between undergraduate and student life (food, housing, and
social life) and undergraduate academic life. Student life and academic life will never be
integrated unless the administration is seriously committed to making it happen (Naylor,
76).
Without a guaranteed sense of their role in the campus community at large,
students, faculty, and administrators will all look to their own defenses as they hash out
their purpose of existence on this campus. Again, the problem lies not in human nature or
70
-
8/14/2019 Campus Politics Lit. Review