UNIVERSITY OF OULU P .O. Box 8000 F I -90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND
A C T A U N I V E R S I T A T I S O U L U E N S I S
University Lecturer Tuomo Glumoff
University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen
Senior research fellow Jari Juuti
Professor Olli Vuolteenaho
University Lecturer Veli-Matti Ulvinen
Planning Director Pertti Tikkanen
Professor Jari Juga
University Lecturer Anu Soikkeli
Professor Olli Vuolteenaho
Publications Editor Kirsti Nurkkala
ISBN 978-952-62-2411-4 (Paperback)ISBN 978-952-62-2412-1 (PDF)ISSN 0355-3213 (Print)ISSN 1796-2226 (Online)
U N I V E R S I TAT I S O U L U E N S I SACTAC
TECHNICA
U N I V E R S I TAT I S O U L U E N S I SACTAC
TECHNICA
OULU 2019
C 725
Davide Bergna
ACTIVATED CARBON FROM RENEWABLE RESOURCESCARBONIZATION, ACTIVATION AND USE
UNIVERSITY OF OULU GRADUATE SCHOOL;UNIVERSITY OF OULU,FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY;KOKKOLA UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM CHYDENIUS
C 725
AC
TAD
avide Bergna
C725etukansi.fm Page 1 Tuesday, October 15, 2019 8:46 AM
ACTA UNIVERS ITAT I S OULUENS I SC Te c h n i c a 7 2 5
DAVIDE BERGNA
ACTIVATED CARBON FROM RENEWABLE RESOURCESCarbonization, activation and use
Academic dissertation to be presented with the assent ofthe Doctoral Training Committee of Technology andNatural Sciences of the University of Oulu for publicdefence in the Ulappa auditorium of Kokkola UniversityConsortium Chydenius (Talonpojankatu 2B) on 29November 2019, at 12 noon
UNIVERSITY OF OULU, OULU 2019
Copyright © 2019Acta Univ. Oul. C 725, 2019
Supervised byProfessor Ulla LassiDoctor Henrik RomarDoctor Pekka Tynjälä
Reviewed byDoctor Rafal LukasikDoctor Miguel A. Montes Morán
ISBN 978-952-62-2411-4 (Paperback)ISBN 978-952-62-2412-1 (PDF)
ISSN 0355-3213 (Printed)ISSN 1796-2226 (Online)
Cover DesignRaimo Ahonen
JUVENES PRINTTAMPERE 2019
OpponentDocent Yohannes Kiros
Bergna, Davide, Activated carbon from renewable resources. Carbonization,activation and useUniversity of Oulu Graduate School; University of Oulu, Faculty of Technology; KokkolaUniversity Consortium ChydeniusActa Univ. Oul. C 725, 2019University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland
Abstract
Biomass is the most abundant renewable material present on Earth and has been widely used e.g.in energy production. Recently, new applications for biomass utilization have been developed, e.g.the use of biomass as a raw material for synthesizing new chemicals. This research aimed toproduce activated carbon (AC) from waste wood-based materials and peat through carbonizationfollowed by physical or chemical activation. Physical steam activation and chemical activationgenerate the porosity in AC after the carbonization. The desired properties of AC (porosity, poresize distribution, surface functionality) are dependent on the application in which AC is used.
The first part of the research focused on setting up the carbonization and activation device. Themost important variables affecting carbonization and activation and the AC properties werestudied. The process parameters were optimized through the design of experiments (DOE). Theresults showed that in the physical activation, the most important variables affecting thecharacteristics of AC are the holding time, temperature, and the steam feed. Consequently, a modelfor tailoring the microporosity or mesoporosity of AC and maximizing the yield is proposed.
The second part of the research focused on chemical activation using zinc chloride. The aimwas to study the effect of activation variables on the yield and properties of AC. Finally, the useof AC as an adsorbent was studied. Especially, the applicability of birch sawdust based activatedcarbon on the removal of dyes, zinc metal, nitrate, phosphate, and sulfate ions was evaluated.Based on the results, a difference was shown between one and two step process for carbonizationand activation, and a single-step process was suggested to maximize the quality of AC.
Keywords: activated carbon, biomass, chemical activation, peat, physical activation,porosity, process optimization, sawdust
Bergna, Davide, Aktiivihiilen valmistus uusiutuvista raaka-aineista. Hiilestys,aktivointi ja käyttöOulun yliopiston tutkijakoulu; Oulun yliopisto, Teknillinen tiedekunta; Kokkolanyliopistokeskus ChydeniusActa Univ. Oul. C 725, 2019Oulun yliopisto, PL 8000, 90014 Oulun yliopisto
Tiivistelmä
Biomassa on maapallon eniten saatavilla olevaa uusiutuvaa materiaalia, jota on hyödynnetty jopitkään mm. energiantuotannossa. Viime aikoina uusia biomassan käyttökohteita on kehitettylaajalti, kuten esimerkiksi uusien kemikaalien valmistukseen. Tässä tutkimuksessa puupohjaistajätebiomassaa ja turvetta hyödynnetään fysikaalisesti ja kemiallisesti aktivoidun aktiivihiilenvalmistuksessa. Fysikaalinen höyryaktivointi ja kemiallinen aktivointi lisäävät aktiivihiilen huo-koisuutta hiilestyksen jälkeen. Aktiivihiilen halutut ominaisuudet (huokoskokojakauma, pinnantoiminnalliset ryhmät) määräytyvät käyttökohteen mukaan.
Tutkimuksen ensimmäisessä vaiheessa keskityttiin hidas pyrolyysilaitteiston ja aktivointilait-teiston rakentamiseen sekä hiilestyksen ja aktivoinnin kannalta keskeisimpien muuttujien tutki-miseen. Prosessimuuttujien vaikutusten tarkastelussa ja optimoinnissa hyödynnettiin koesuunnit-teluohjelmaa. Tulosten perusteella todettiin, että fysikaalisessa aktivoinnissa olennaisimmatmuuttujat olivat lämpötila, pitoaika sekä höyrysyöttö. Tämän pohjalta esitettiin malli aktiivihii-len mikro- ja mesohuokoisuuden muokkaamiseksi ja saannon maksimoimiseksi.
Tutkimuksen toisessa vaiheessa tutkittiin kemiallista aktivointia hyödyntämällä sinkkiklori-dia aktivointikemikaalina. Tavoitteena oli selvittää eri aktivointimuuttujien vaikutusta saantoonja aktiivihiilen laatuun. Tutkimuksen viimeisessä vaiheessa tutkittiin valmistettujen aktiivihiili-en käyttöä adsorbenttina. Erityisesti tutkittiin koivupurusta valmistetun aktiivihiilen soveltuvuut-ta väriaineiden, metallien ja anionien sidontaan. Tutkimuksen keskeisenä tuloksena voitiin osoit-taa merkittävä ero yksi- ja kaksivaiheisen hiilestyksen ja aktivoinnin välillä, ja ehdotettiin yksi-vaiheista prosessia hiililaadun optimoimiseksi.
Asiasanat: aktiivihiili, biomassa, fysikaalinen aktivointi, huokoisuus, kemiallinenaktivointi, prosessioptimointi, sahanpuru, turve
Bergna, Davide, Carbone attivo da fonti rinnovabili. Carbonizzazione, attivazioneed usoScuola di ricerca dell'Università di Oulu; Università di Oulu, Facoltà di Tecnologia; Universitàdi Kokkola Consorzio ChydeniusActa Univ. Oul. C 725, 2019Università di Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014 Università di Oulu, Finlandia
Sommario
La biomassa è il materiale rinnovabile più abbondante presente sulla Terra ed è stata intensamenteusata e.g. nella produzione di energia. Recentemente sono state sviluppate nuove applicazioni perla biomassa, ad esempio come materiale di base per sintetizzare nuovi prodotti chimici. Lo scopodi questa ricerca è produrre carbone attivo (CA) attraverso attivazione fisica e chimica da materialilegnosi di scarto come segatura, cippato e torba. L'attivazione fisica e l'attivazione chimica, creanola porosità nel CA dopo la carbonizzazione. Il prodotto finale può essere usato in differentiapplicazioni in base a diversi fattori tra cui la distribuzione della porosità e la tipologia dei gruppifunzionali presenti sulla superficie.
La prima fase della ricerca è stata dedicata alla progettazione e installazione dell'hardwarenecessario per l'attivazione e nell'individuazione dei parametri di processo più importanti. Iparametri di processo sono stati ottimizzati attraverso il design of experiments (DOE) e sono stateconsiderate le differenti variabili che interagiscono nella formazione del CA. I risultati hannomostrato che i parametri di processo più importanti che influiscono sulle caratteristiche del CAsono il tempo, la temperatura di attivazione e la quantità di vapore iniettato nel reattore. È statoproposto un modello per progettare CA microporoso o mesoporoso con massa finalemassimizzata. La seconda parte della ricerca è stata incentrata sull'attivazione chimica con clorurodi zinco. Lo scopo é stato studiare l'effetto delle variabili di attivazione su massa finale e proprietàdel carbone attivo. Infine, è stata studiato il CA come adsorbente. In particolare è stata consideratal'applicabilità del CA da segatura di betulla per la rimozione di coloranti, zinco metallico, ioni dinitrato, fosfato e solfato. In base a questi risultati, una differenza é stata evidenziata tra il processodi carbonizzazione e attivazione a uno o due stadi, ed il processo a singolo stadio è stato propostoper massimizzare la qualità del CA.
Parole chiave: carbone attivo, biomassa, attivazione fisica, attivazione chimica, torba,porosità, ottimizzazione di processo, segatura
To Satu and Anna
10
11
Acknowledgments
This research work was carried out at Kokkola at the University Consortium
Chydenius facility together with the Research Unit of Sustainable Chemistry of
Oulu in the period between August 2015 and July 2019.
The list of people I must acknowledge for this work is very long, and I
apologize in advance if I forgot someone.
First, let me thank Prof. Ulla Lassi, my dear supervisor, for giving me the
chance to develop, on a rare hot day in Finland in August five years ago, the idea
behind this research. To listen and give credit to a person you don´t know requires
courage: thanks, Ulla, for having had the courage to trust me that day.
In addition, thanks again to Prof. Ulla Lassi, Prof. Timo Fabritius, Prof. Osmo
Hormi, and Dr. Tero Tuuttila for guiding me during the follow-up group meetings.
Dr. Rafal Lukasik from the National Laboratory of Energy and Geology of
Lisbon, Portugal and Dr. Miguel Angel Montes Morán from the National Institute
of Carbon of Oviedo, Spain are deeply acknowledged for the work in reviewing
and commenting my thesis manuscript.
I would like to thank Prof. Laura Prati, Prof. Claudia Letizia Bianchi, and the
staff of the University of Milan for their fruitful collaboration.
I must make a special acknowledgment to Dr. Henrik Romar. He really gave
me the instruments and the tools to make this research practically possible. He has
been guiding me like Virgil with Dante through the “Inferno” that can be a research
laboratory if not properly handled.
I would also like to thank my research colleagues: M.Sc. Juho Välikangas, for
having acquainted me with the workplace; Mr. Jaakko Pulkkinen, for the
multitasking support; M.Sc. Riikka Lahti, for her kindness and help in many
projects; M.Sc. Toni Varila, for his support and unforgettable time spent during the
conference in York; D.Sc. Tuomas Vielma, for having introduced me to the world
of multivariate analysis; M.Sc. Toni Kauppinen, for his help in the laboratory; Dr.
Pekka Tynjäla, Dr. Katja Lappalainen, M.Sc. Henna Lempiäinen, M.Sc. Jiachen
Dong, M.Sc. Marianna Hietaniemi, M.Sc. Pekka Myllymäki, Tuomo Vähätitto,
M.Sc. Anatoli Vaskinov, M.Sc. Janne Keränen, M.Sc. Petteri Laine, Sini Kivioja,
Nuorala Jessica, Qi Ping, Pauliina Seppälä, and Joonas Kallio, for their daily help
and support.
I want to thank the research unit of sustainable chemistry of Oulu in particular
Dr. Hu Tao for the FESEM images, Dr. Hanna Prokkola for the elemental analysis,
Dr. Sari Tuomikoski, Dr. Hanna Runtti, and Dr. Teija Kangas for the review paper,
12
M.Sc. Annu Rusanen, M.Sc. Riikka Juhola and M.Sc. Johanna Kutuniva for their
kindness and Dr. Yue Dong and Dr. Laura Schneider for their support as
international doctoral students.
A special thanks goes to the Director of the University Consortium Chydenius,
Dr. Tanja Risikko, and all the Chydenius University staff.
The Central Ostrobothnia Regional Fund, to which goes my deep gratitude, has
financially supported this research.
In the end, I would like to thank my Italian and Finnish family and friends, and
my wife Satu and daughter Anna for giving me strength, joy, and enthusiasm in
everyday life.
Kokkola, 29 November 2019 Davide Bergna
13
Abbreviations
AC/ACs Activated carbon/Activated carbons
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
AUX Auxiliary components
BET Brunauer, Emmet, Teller theory
BJH Barrett, Joyner, Halenda theory
CGs Condensable gases
DFT Density functional theory
DOE Design of experiments
DP Dry pyrolysis
FESEM Field emission scanning electron microscope
GV Gentian violet (hexamethyl pararosaniline chloride)
HTC Hydrothermal carbonization
MB Methylene blue (methylthioninium chloride)
MFC Mass flow controller
NCGs Noncondensable gases
OII Orange II (2-naphtol orange)
PAH Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
PCM Pyrogenic carbonaceous materials
PLC Programmable logic controller
PLS Partial least square regression
PSD Pore size distribution
PP Process parameters
QSDFT Quenched solid density functional theory
SSA Specific surface area
TC Total carbon
wt.% Weight percentage
14
15
Original publications
This thesis is based on the following publications, which are referred to throughout
the text by their Roman numerals:
I Bergna D., Romar H., Tuomikoski S., Runtti H., Kangas T., Tynjälä P., & Lassi, U. (2017). Activated carbon from renewable sources: thermochemical conversion and activation of biomass and carbon residues from biomass gasification. In L. Singh, V. C. Kalia (Eds.), Waste Biomass Management – A Holistic Approach (pp 187-213) Springer.
II Bergna D., Varila T., Romar H., & Lassi, U. (2018). Comparison of the properties of activated carbons produced in one-stage and two-stage processes. C Journal of Carbon Research 4(3): 41.
III Bergna D., Romar H., & Lassi, U. (2018). Physical activation of wooden chips and the effect of particle size, initial humidity, and acetic acid extraction on the properties of activated carbons. C Journal of Carbon Research 4(4): 66.
IV Bergna D., Hu T., Prokkola H., Romar H., & Lassi, U. (2019). Effect of some process parameters on the main properties of activated carbon produced from peat in a lab-scale process. Waste and Biomass Valorization.
V Varila T., Bergna D., Lahti R., Romar H., Hu T., & Lassi, U. (2017). Activated carbon production from peat using ZnCl2: characterization and applications. BioResources 12(4): 8078-8092.
VI Lahti R., Bergna D., Romar H., Tuuttila T., Hu T., & Lassi, U. (2017). Physico-chemical properties and use of waste biomass-derived activated carbons. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 57: 43-48.
Papers I–IV were written by the author of this thesis in collaboration with the other
authors. For Papers II–IV, the author’s main responsibilities were experimentation,
data analysis, and reporting the results. For Paper V and Paper VI, the author
contributed with the experimental part (carbonization and activation) and data
analysis.
Other contributions not included in this thesis:
Lahti R, Bergna D, Romar H, Hu T, Comazzi A, Pirola C, Bianchi CL, & Lassi U
(2017) Characterization of cobalt catalysts on biomass-derived carbon supports.
Topics in Catalysis, 60: 1415-1428.
Prati L, Bergna D, Villa A, Spontoni P, Bianchi CL, Hu T, Romar H, & Lassi U
(2018) Carbons from second generation biomass as sustainable supports for catalytic
systems. Catalysis Today 301: 239-243.
16
17
Contents
Abstract
Tiivistelmä
Sommario
Acknowledgments 11
Abbreviations 13
Original publications 15
Contents 17
1 Introduction 19
1.1 Background ............................................................................................. 19
1.2 Aim of the thesis ..................................................................................... 20
2 Activated carbon 23
2.1 Definitions of different carbon types ...................................................... 23
2.2 Activated carbon properties and structure ............................................... 28
2.2.1 Porosity ......................................................................................... 28
2.2.2 Functional groups ......................................................................... 29
2.3 Production methods ................................................................................. 32
2.3.1 Carbonization (slow pyrolysis) ..................................................... 32
2.3.2 Physical activation ........................................................................ 36
2.3.3 Chemical activation ...................................................................... 37
2.4 Activated carbon use ............................................................................... 38
2.4.1 Gas and water cleaning ................................................................. 38
2.4.2 Food processing ............................................................................ 39
2.4.3 Support for catalysts ..................................................................... 39
2.4.4 Electrical applications .................................................................. 40
2.4.5 Other applications ......................................................................... 41
3 Materials and Methods 43
3.1 Materials used for carbonization and activation...................................... 43
3.1.1 Sawdust, peat, and woodchips ...................................................... 43
3.2 Pre-treatments and activation .................................................................. 44
3.2.1 Acetic acid extraction ................................................................... 44
3.2.2 Physical activation ........................................................................ 45
3.2.3 Chemical activation ...................................................................... 47
3.3 Characterization ...................................................................................... 48
3.3.1 Moisture, total carbon content, yield ............................................ 48
3.3.2 Surface areas and pore size distribution ....................................... 49
18
3.3.3 Adsorptive properties ................................................................... 50
3.3.4 Other characterizations ................................................................. 51
3.3.5 Experimental design ..................................................................... 51
4 Results and discussion 53
4.1 Research review of recent AC studies ..................................................... 53
4.2 Difference between one- and two-stage physical activation ................... 54
4.3 Particle size initial humidity and acetic acid extraction .......................... 56
4.4 Parameters affecting biomass carbonization and activation .................... 59
4.4.1 AC from peat design of experiment and parameter
modeling and optimization ........................................................... 62
4.5 Chemical activation with ZnCl2 .............................................................. 63
4.6 Properties of biomass waste-derived AC................................................. 64
5 Conclusions 67
6 Perspectives 69
List of references 71
Original publications 81
19
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
The Paris Agreement – Status of Ratification (2017) represents a milestone in
international agreements regarding greenhouse gas emission mitigation, adaptation,
and finance. In 2018, 195 countries signed the agreement, and 180 have ratified it.
With the noticeable possible withdraw of the United States, for the first time, the
whole world, including most industrialized countries, agreed to the reduction of the
actual environmental pollution trend. In particular, the three main aims of the
agreement are (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2016):
– Holding the increase of the global temperature below 2 °C in reference to the
pre-industrial period and pursuing the effort to reach 1.5 °C, recognizing the
impacts of pollution on climate change.
– Increasing the capability to adapt to the adverse impact of climate change,
lowering greenhouse emissions in order to preserve food production.
– Guaranteeing proper financial support to sustain the effort to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and create a climate-resilient development.
The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is considered the main cause of the
greenhouse effect, even though recent studies have demonstrated that black carbon,
reducing the ice albedo and dispersing as an aerosol into the atmosphere, is making
a great contribution to the global warming process (Ramanathan & Carmichael,
2008) (Jacobson, 2001). Historical data suggest that in the past, higher levels of
CO2 have been present in the atmosphere (Lowenstein & Demicco, 2006), probably
due to volcanism (Schmitz et al., 2004).
The official data of Tilastokeskus (Statistics Finland, 2019) report emissions of
CO2 for the year 2018 of 56.5 Mt, with a 2% increase compared to the previous
year. Forest biomass is a significant CO2 sink. According to the 2018 data, the
LULUCF (land use, land use change, and forestry) sector has reduced the CO2 net
balance by 14.2 Mt, a significantly lower performance (-30%) if compared to 2017.
(Statistics Finland, 2019). In Finland, the surface area occupied by forest is about
23 million hectares, or about three-fourths of the total surface area of the country.
If sparse trees and other forestry lands are considered, then this surface area
increases to 86% of the country (10% is occupied by water). The wooden forest
stocks have shown constant growth in the last 40 years (Parviainen & Västilä, 2011).
On the other hand, Finland is covered by 9.3 million hectares of peatlands. Peat
20
combustion supplied 4% of Finnish electrical power and 13% of district heating in
2017. Recent government legislation has implemented guidelines for the 2030
energy and climate strategy, including a substantial reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions and deeper and more efficient use of wood-based biomasses and peat
(Huttunen, 2017).
Finland decided to ban the use of coal as a source of energy on May 1st, 2029,
and to reduce the use of peat for energy production by one-half (7.5 TWh)
compared to present consumption by 2025. Thus, different alternatives to peat use
are needed to preserve the existing industrial cluster and relative economy. The
same consideration is valid for wood and sawdust, where a higher value from the
processing of the material can be obtained instead of direct combustion.
AC production from peat, sawdust, and wood chips represents one feasible
technological alternative to combustion and energy use. During the year 2017,
Finland imported 5.5 M€ (est. 3900 tons) of AC and exported 0.34 M€ (est. 217
tons), causing a deficit balance of about 4.9 M€ (Parker, 2015). Currently, AC is
not produced in Finland, but Vapo Oy plans to start peat-based technical carbon
production in Ilomantsi (Vapo Oy, 2018). The present technology can easily
saturate domestic AC needs and could be a possible commodity for export. The
need for AC worldwide is rising, with many economic reviews forecasting a CAGR
(compound average growth rate) over 8% for the next 10 years (Transparency
Market Research, 2018; Verified Market Research, 2018)
1.2 Aim of the thesis
The scope of this thesis concerns the laboratory-scale development of biomass
carbonization and activation and biomass waste residuals (peat and wood
chips/sawdust) and the analysis of process parameters in order to investigate how
they affect the properties of the final carbon product.
Both chemical and physical activation have been studied, with the main interest
focused on the latter, due to its higher environmentally friendly process. The
activating agent used for physical activation is steam; while for chemical activation,
zinc chloride was selected as the activating agent. In the end, some possible
applications for AC are considered.
The original publications (I–VI) of this thesis are presented in Fig. 1.
21
Fig. 1. Thesis scheme and research topic diagram.
The main theses of this dissertation are:
1. High-quality AC with a high surface area and controlled porosity can be
produced from biomass waste.
2. Carbonization and activation as a thermal process done in a single stage differs
from that performed in two stages.
3. AC properties depend strongly on the production process and pre-treatment
parameters, and these properties can be tailored.
22
23
2 Activated carbon
There are two types of raw material available for the production of AC: fossil coal,
and biomass-based carbon. In this thesis, only biomass-based carbon is considered.
When it comes to carbon and especially AC, there are a number of solid, carbon-
containing products available on the market. The naming of these products is still
confusing, hence the terminology is explained in the following chapter. AC can be
produced in a number of processes, yet a common route in all these processes
includes a carbonization step and an activation step. A short description of the
individual steps and procedures is presented later on in this chapter. Further, AC
properties and applications are briefly considered.
2.1 Definitions of different carbon types
Typically, AC from coconut shells is used, but some concerns have been raised
regarding the transport, mixing energy, and ethical labor conditions involved in the
countries where it is produced (Arena, Lee, & Clift, 2016). On the industrial scale,
two main methodologies can be identified: In the first method, biomass is first
carbonized and then physically activated. The physical activation occurs at a high
temperature (600–900 °C) under a stream of typical CO2 or steam. This activating
atmosphere determines the slow oxidation of the carbon, creating porosity and
oxygen complexes on the surface (Marsh & Rodríguez-Reinoso, 2006a). The other
method for activating carbon is through chemical activation, in which the biomass
precursor is first impregnated with an activating chemical agent (ZnCl2, H3PO4,
KOH, NaOH, etc.) and then carbonized and activated in one single step at different
temperatures depending on the type of chemical used (Marsh & Rodríguez-Reinoso,
2006b). In Fig. 2, a simplified cycle of converting biomass to AC is proposed.
24
Fig. 2. Schematic process diagram of the activated carbon (AC) from biomass.
The nomenclature for carbon produced in thermal processes is to some extent rather
vague, and the same product is often described by multiple names. To some extent,
the naming is regulated by international agreement, but there is still a lack of
agreement and standardization, especially regarding AC. In the following
paragraphs, some of the relevant terminologies are introduced
According to definitions from the International Biochar Initiative, a different
typology of carbon from biomass can be identified (O’Laughlin & McElligott,
2009).
Biochar, sometimes referred to as Biocarbon, is classified as a solid material
obtained from the thermochemical conversion of biomass in an oxygen-limited
environment. In particular, to be considered as biochar, the material must match
specific properties, e.g., H/Corg, heavy metal content limit, etc. (European Biochar
Foundation (EBC), 2018), and be used as a soil amendment in order to remove CO2
from the atmosphere.
Hydrochar is identified as the solid product of hydrothermal carbonization
(HTC) or liquefaction. The process of production is different compared to that for
biochar (lower temperature but higher pressure), and the final product presents
different chemical and morphological characteristics (Kambo & Dutta, 2015).
Pyrogenic Carbonaceous Materials (PCM) comprise all the materials produced
by thermochemical conversion. In this group, everything containing some organic
25
C (without any mass limitation), i.e., charcoal, biochar, char, black carbon, soot, or
AC, can be identified.
Char results from incomplete combustion processes that occur in natural and
man-made fires. It differs from charcoal, which is produced by thermochemical
conversion from biomass solely for energy generation.
Each one of these different materials typically contains ashes, defined as the
fraction of biomass or PCM determined through the standard (ASTM E1755-01,
2012), and includes inorganic oxides and carbonates (Nunes, Matias, & Catalão,
2016).
Carbon soot and carbon black are defined as PCMs dispersed in the
environment from wildfires and fossil fuel combustion as well as from secondary
gas condensation products, respectively (Buseck, Adachi, Gelencsér, Tompa, &
Pósfai, 2012). Carbon black is created under controlled conditions, while soot is
casually formed. Typically, the size of the colloidal carbon that produces carbon
black is <1000 nm. Carbon black generally contains high values of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) (Tsai, Shieh, Hsieh, & Lee, 2001).
Finally, activated carbon is identified directly as a PCM that has undergone
activation (i.e., using steam, CO2, or chemicals) (Marsh & Rodríguez-Reinoso,
2006c).
In another definition from IUPAC, AC is described as a porous carbon
material—a char which has been subjected to reaction with gases, sometimes with
the addition of chemicals, e.g., ZnCl2, before, during, or after the carbonization, in
order to increase its adsorptive properties (Fitzer, Kochling, Boehm, & Marsh,
1995). In the same IUPAC recommendation, activated charcoal is defined as a
“traditional” term for AC.
The REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of
Chemicals) divides the AC typology into two categories: ACs with low-density
skeleton and ACs with high-density skeleton. The skeletal density is determined
through helium pycnometry. The low-density skeleton typically has a lower
impurity content and must be handled as a possible fire hazard, especially in high
quantities. On the contrary, AC with a high-density skeleton has a higher mineral
content (SiO2, CaO, MgO, FeO, K2CO3, Al2O3, and CaSO4), so the hazard is more
related to inhalation than flammability.
It is opportune to define the process of pyrolysis as a form of thermolysis (the
breakdown or decomposition of molecules through the action of heat) in the inert
atmosphere.
26
Pyrolysis can be divided into fast pyrolysis, where the heating rates reported
are higher than 1000 °C/min with a residence time of a few seconds (Montoya
Arbeláez, Janna, & Garcia-Pérez, 2015), and slow or mild pyrolysis, where the rates
are generally between 1–100 °C/min.
Torrefaction is a pyrolysis process at relatively low temperatures (225–300 °C)
whereby a large portion of the volatiles is removed from the starting material.
Generally, in fast pyrolysis, the production of a liquid fraction is favored, while in
slow pyrolysis, the solid product yield is improved. Another form of thermolysis is
gasification, in which the material is oxidized at relatively high temperatures, with
the low controlled tenor of O2 introducing air or steam. This process favors the
production of syngas with a less solid fraction. Some studies have demonstrated
that gasification with steam can produce an “activated” carbon residue (Benedetti,
Patuzzi, & Baratieri, 2017; García-García et al., 2003). In Table 1, a summary of
some carbon processing methods is presented.
In this thesis, it has been considered correct to describe the final product
produced simply as activated carbon.
27
Ta
ble
1. S
um
ma
ry o
f d
iffe
ren
t n
om
en
cla
ture
s i
n t
he
fu
nc
tio
n o
f th
e p
roc
es
s p
rod
uc
tio
n t
yp
es
.
Ta
rge
t p
rod
uct
T
em
pe
ratu
re
( ℃)
Ca
rbo
niz
atio
n
Act
iva
tion
S
SA
(m
2/g
) A
tm.
So
lid f
ract
ion
yield
wt.%
Refe
rence
Bio
char
300–700
S
low
Pyr
oly
sis
No
Low
<3
00
In
ert
M
ediu
m≈3
0–
50
%
(We
be
r &
Qu
icke
r, 2
01
8)
HT
C
200–250
S
low
Pyr
oly
sis
No
Low
<1
00
20–30
ba
r/st
ea
m -
vola
tile
s
Hig
h≈5
0–70%
(T
u e
t al.,
2019)
Phys
ically
AC
600–900
S
low
Pyr
oly
sis
H2O
/CO
2
Hig
h>
1000
In
ert
/Slo
wO
x ≈1
0–
20
%
(Da
nis
h &
Ah
ma
d,
20
18
a)
Chem
ica
lly A
C
500–800
S
low
Pyr
oly
sis
ZnC
l 2/H
3P
O4/K
OH
/Na
OH
Hig
h>
10
00
In
ert
≈4
0%
(P
rau
chn
er
& R
od
ríg
ue
z-
Rein
oso
, 2012)
Syn
gas
800–1000
S
low
Therm
oly
sis
No
Low
Low
Ox
Low
(C
outo
, R
ou
boa, S
ilva,
Mo
nte
iro
, &
Bo
uzi
an
e,
20
13
)
Pyr
oly
tic o
il 450–650
F
ast
Pyr
oly
sis
No
N
o
Inert
Low
(I
sahak,
His
ham
, Y
arm
o, &
Yun H
in, 2012)
28
2.2 Activated carbon properties and structure
In this section, the structural characteristics and main properties of AC are
presented.
2.2.1 Porosity
The most known peculiarity that characterizes AC is its porosity. Porosity from a
schematic point of view is a cluster of channels, slits, and tunnels of different and
mainly irregular morphology that run through the porous material. In general,
porosity is defined as the fraction of the total pore volume in the particle volume
(Thommes et al., 2015a). The surface of the pores can be schematized as in Fig. 2.
The level closer to the bulk is the van der Waals surface, which is composed by the
external part of the van der Waals spheres. The layer just above is the Connolly
surface, which is where, in the adsorptive material, the process called physisorption
(low energy interaction due mainly to van der Waals force) takes place. In the upper
level, the probe accessible surface, which is defined as the surface designed by
rolling the probe molecule onto the Connolly surface at a probe radius distance, is
found. This surface relates the size of the probe molecule with the adsorptive
material surface (partially explaining why different size molecules have different
adsorption performances).
The morphology and the pore volume are key factors in the characterization of
a porous material. In particular, the pore size distribution can determine different
behaviors in the adsorptive material. For this reason, the IUPAC classification (Sing
et al., 1985) divides the pores according to their diameter size (x) as follows:
– Micropores x < 2 nm.
– Mesopores 2nm < x < 50 nm.
– Macropores x > 50 nm.
The surface area and the pore size distribution, which are the most used parameters
to confront and evaluate the quality of the porous material, are generally calculated
from the nitrogen adsorption-desorption data and from the geometry of the pores.
Referring to AC, these parameters are not a simple determination because of the
typical heterogeneity of the pore geometry.
29
Fig. 3. Pore distribution and porous material surface scheme.
Considering AC specifically, its structure and surface properties are influenced by
two other characteristics: the type of precursor material used, and the type of
process used for activation. Differences in the performance of AC from different
precursors have been demonstrated (De Lima, Quináia, Melquiades, De Biasi, &
Garcia, 2014), as have differences in structural development related to the
activation method (Viswanathan, Neel, & Varadarajan, 2009).
2.2.2 Functional groups
Different material precursors have been used to produce AC, but the most used
precursors are those derived from biomasses—and among them, the most
interesting from an environmental point of view are those derived from waste
biomasses (Schröder et al., 2011). AC, as said before, has a high surface area and
functional groups that can bind with organic and inorganic (e.g., heavy metals)
compounds, separating them from the main stream (Fig. 4). The functional groups
are mainly based on the oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, and sulfur present in the
original raw material or developed during the activation process. The most common
oxygen functional groups are carboxyl, carbonyl, phenols, lactones, and quinones
(Bhatnagar, Hogland, Marques, & Sillanpää, 2013).
30
Fig. 4. Typical functional groups of activated carbon: (a) carboxyl, (b) hydroxyl, (c)
lactone, (d) carbonyl, (e) carboxylic anhydride, (f) possible carboxylic adsorption
mechanism of heavy metals, (g) metal adsorbed by the carboxylic functional group.
Treating AC with basic materials enhances the uptake of organics but reduces the
chelating capability of metal ions.
Impregnation with a foreign material is performed to catalyze some reactions
(such as oxidation); on the other hand, occupying part of the porosity with such
material reduces the surface area.
Concerning the physical activation, a different modulation of the heat and
activating agent can increase the surface area but reduces the oxygen functional
groups on the surface.
One of the first works to determine the type of carbon structure produced by
pyrolysis dates to 1951 (Franklin, 1951). Typically, AC from a biomass source is
considered part of non-graphitizing carbon, a type of carbon that cannot be
transformed into a graphitic crystalline structure, even at high temperatures
(3000 °C) (Cheng, Endo, Okabe, Saito, & Zheng, 1999).
31
Fig. 5. Proposed activated carbon structure: (a) disordered and not continuous carbon
rings lattice with functional groups on the surface, (b) a “buckyball”-like structure, (c)
typical sp2 electron configuration of the carbon atom.
Previous studies indicated a possible fragmented fullerene-type structure
composing the non-graphitizing carbon (Harris & Tsang, 1997; Harris, 2005), thus
explaining the microporosity generated through the irregular hexagonal and non-
hexagonal “buckyball”-like structure (Fig. 5). According to these studies, this
particularity gives to AC its peculiar properties (Harris, Liu, & Suenaga, 2008).
Other research has indicated that it is possible to graphitize non-graphitizable raw
materials through catalytic graphitization (Oya & Otani, 1979) or micro-domain
modification and merging (Kim et al., 2017).
This development in the study of AC structure results is particularly important
because it changes the theoretical approach to modeling surface areas and porosity.
In fact, by now, most of the main models are based on chemical and geometrical
homogeneity of the pore walls on a smooth surface (Gor, Thommes, Cychosz, &
Neimark, 2012). Also, the calculation and results of this research work are based
on this approach, but a further analysis could be performed considering new models
like QSDFT (quenched solid density functional theory) (Neimark, Lin, Ravikovitch,
& Thommes, 2009), which considers non-homogeneous AC surfaces.
32
2.3 Production methods
In the following chapter, the activation methods used for this research are presented.
2.3.1 Carbonization (slow pyrolysis)
Carbonization is a process in which an organic-based material increases its carbon
percent content. Typically, this happens through destructive distillation in an inert
atmosphere in which a complex of reactions, such as dehydrogenation,
isomerization, condensation, and hydrogen transfer, takes place. Carbonization is
defined as solid-phase carbonization when the pseudo-morph carbon material
maintains the same shape of the starting material but with lower bulk density.
During the carbonization process, the carbon supramolecular structure moves to
more stable carbon structures (e.g., six atom rings). The spaces created by the
decomposition and subsequent release of heteroatoms and the repositioning of the
carbon atoms initiate the creation of microporosity (i.e., atomic size dimension)
(Marsh & Rodríguez-Reinoso, 2006c).
The main components of the biomass used are cellulose, hemicellulose, and
lignin. Hemicellulose is a composition of saccharides (e.g., galactose, mannose,
xylose) in a casual amorphic structure and has the function of strengthening the cell
walls in trees. Cellulose is a glucose polymer-ordered shape and serves many
functions in trees, e.g., it is the fiber that composes leaves, stems, and branches.
Lignin is a group of aromatic rings with a low hydrophilic level that comprises the
structure of trees, surrounding (like glue) the other two main components and
allowing the efficient distribution of water. In peat, generally, the content of these
three polymers is lower with the increase of humic and fulvic acids due to plant
decay and biodegradation (Brown, Kauri, Kushner, & Mathur, 2010; Pérez, Muñoz-
Dorado, De La Rubia, & Martínez, 2002).
Referring to wood-based material, carbonization occurs thermally,
decomposing the three main components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin,
thereby reducing the non-carbonaceous content of their molecular chains. Cellulose
and hemicellulose complete their degradation in temperatures ranging between
200–375 °C, while lignin, which has a more complex molecular structure,
decomposes between 200 and 700 °C (Huang et al., 2015; Wongsiriamnuay &
Tippayawong, 2010). During pyrolysis, the first component to undergo
decomposition is hemicellulose. Its content in the biomass varies between 23 and
32 wt.% (Paper VI), and the depolymerization starts at temperatures between 220–
33
315 °C (Yang, Yan, Chen, Lee, & Zheng, 2007). As can be seen in Fig. 6, a proposed
but not sole pathway mechanism identifies a thermally induced depolymerization
of hemicellulose to oligosaccharides. The increase of temperature determines
dehydration, the release of water molecules, and a molecular rearrangement to
xylose. A further increase in temperature causes the breaking of hydrogen and
carbon bonds with the release of molecular hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Other
studies (Giudicianni, Cardone, & Ragucci, 2013) have identified the decomposition
of xylans (the main biopolymers of hemicellulose) to furans, pentanone, and
hydroquinone as a possible further pathway. In an oxidative atmosphere, the
decomposition can lead to the formation of acetone and acetic acid (Shen et al.,
2015)
Fig. 6. Decomposition of hemicellulose during thermal distillation in an inert
atmosphere (Reprinted by permission from Liu, Li, Jiang, & Yu, 2017 © American
Chemical Society).
34
The content of cellulose varies from 37–45% (Paper VI) and changes according to
the wood species. During pyrolysis, cellulose starts to decompose at a temperature
between 315–400 °C. In the first part of the decomposition pathway mechanism
proposed (Fig. 7), the cellulose is depolymerized to oligosaccharides in a process
similar to that of hemicellulose. While the temperatures rise, the oligosaccharides
are decomposed into a simple monosaccharide (glucoside) and, after dehydration,
to levoglucosan.
Fig. 7. Cellulose decomposition to oligosaccharides and further to levoglucosan during
pyrolysis (Redrawn from Zhang, Yang, & Blasiak, 2013).
Lignin contains a variety of aromatic rings with different characteristics
determining a more difficult decomposition and wider temperature range (200–
700 °C). The lignin content in the wood can vary by species with the content of e.g.
23–27 wt.% (Paper VI). The products from the thermal decomposition change
according to the initial lignin composition. This different composition in mainly
associated with monolignols (mainly coniferyl alcohol, sinapyl alcohol, and
paracoumaryl alcohol), biosynthesis enzymes, and enzymes that operate lignin
transport (Campbell & Sederoff, 1996). In Fig. 8, (Kosa, Ben, Theliander, &
Ragauskas, 2011) proposed a potential but not sole thermal decomposition
mechanism for lignin that determines the simplified production of 20 different
compounds as follows:
– starting lignin structure (1)
– relatively stable β-5 product in the primary decomposition step (2)
– α-O cleavage product (3)
– methyl guaiacols (4)
– aldehydes (5)
35
– styrenes and 6a (“reduced vinyl-”) ethyl-phenols (6)
– stilbenes (7)
– phenoxy radicals (8)
– guaiacols (9)
– catechols (10),
– transient radicals (11, 13, 14, 17, 19)
– aliphatics (12)
– phenols (15)
– condensation products (e.g. 4-O-5 dimers) (16, 18)
– cresols (20).
Where the R1 cinnamyl group (propanoid unit), R2, R6, R8 γ carbons in cinnamyl
groups, and R3-5, R7, R9-11 H, and CH3 are phenylpropanoid
units/macromolecules.
The typology of compounds produced is dependent on the type of starting
material, the moisture content, the decomposition temperature, and the process
atmosphere (Brebu & Vasile, 2010). For this heterogeneous production during the
thermal decomposition and for its abundance in nature, lignin is considered a
potential source of raw organic chemicals.
Fig. 8. Lignin decomposition during pyrolysis (Reprinted by permission from Kosa, et
al., 2011 © Royal Society of Chemistry)
36
2.3.2 Physical activation
In the activation process, the removal of the carbon atoms from the nanostructure
of the precursor accessing and interconnecting the inherent structural porosity
occurs. In physical activation, the carbonized raw material is activated by the
physical activating agent. Typically, the activating agents used are water vapor
(steam) or carbon dioxide. Additionally, a mixture of water vapor (steam) and
carbon dioxide can be used. The activation temperature varies between 600 °C and
900 °C. The choice of the activation agent and the activation time depends on the
type of raw material and the pore size distribution needed. Generally, CO2
determines a more microporous structure, while steam favors the production of
mesopores (Rodríguez-Reinoso, Molina-Sabio, & González, 1995).
Physical activation, including the carbonization step, is a two-stage process,
and therefore activation is performed after the carbonization process. A physical
activating agent, such as steam, is fed to the precursor material at temperatures of
between 600 °C and 900 °C. During this phase, the carbon changes physically;
additionally, the carbon changes chemically by opening the carbon matrix and
changing its functional groups. The quantity of activating agent used is a function
of the type and the mass of carbon source material. In Fig. 9, a typical temperature
activation profile is presented.
Fig. 9. Scheme of physical activation of carbon.
Generally, the efficiency of this activation is influenced by contact between the
activating agent and the mass of carbon. Therefore, rotating activation reactors are
preferable during this stage. The entire process must be realized under an inert
atmosphere, e.g., nitrogen, because the prepared carbon autoignition temperature
in atmospheric conditions is around 350–400 °C and, moreover, water molecules
37
include hydrogen and oxygen and can thus generate a potentially explosive
atmosphere. Steam activation time is also a parameter that must be optimized
because it can influence the structure and yield of the carbon mass. Typically, higher
activation times correspond to higher yield loss but also to higher porosity. From a
chemical point of view, during steam activation, the following compounds exist:
O2, CO2, H2, and H2O. Simplified reactions for steam activation are listed in Table
2.
Table 2. Simplified reactions occurring during steam activation and relative enthalpy
(Paper IV)
Reactants Products Enthalpy of reaction
Cx(H2O)y xC(s)+yH2O
C + H2O CO + H2 ΔH = 31.14 kcal mol-1
CO + H2O CO2 + H2 ΔH = -9.65 kcal mol-1
C + CO2 2CO ΔH = 40.79 kcal mol-1
C + 2H2 CH4 ΔH = -17.87 kcal mol-1
2.3.3 Chemical activation
Chemical activation can be considered a single-step process in which the
carbonization of raw material and activation are done simultaneously. Substances
which contain alkali and alkaline earth metals and some general acids are typically
used as a chemical activating agent, such as KOH, NaOH, ZnCl2, and H3PO4
(Ahmadpour & Do, 1996). Chemicals during the activation step can act as a
dehydrating agent (e.g., ZnCl2 and H3PO4), and these types of chemicals are
commonly used for the activation of especially lignocellulosic materials. Alkali
hydroxides are used as chemical activating agents for the activation of coal or chars.
In the chemical activation process, the biomass is first impregnated with a solution
containing the chemical activating agent, after which it is dried in an oven and then
heated in a furnace, with rather lower temperatures (400 to 600 °C) compared to
physical activation, under an inert atmosphere (nitrogen atmosphere). In the case
of chemical activation, important factors include the correct mass to carbon ratio
needed to avoid excessive consumption of reagents and the proper activation
temperature, which can vary according to the type of chemical agent used.
Differently from physical activation, a final washing phase to remove from the
38
precursor material from the chemical activating agent and to uncover the porosity
is necessary.
From the mechanism point of view, ZnCl2 acts as a dehydrating agent in the
carbonization phase, determining the creation of charring and aromatics and
leaving the pore structure after acid washing (Liou, 2010). Moreover, ZnCl2,
working as a tarring inhibitor and “salt templating” (Fechler, Fellinger, & Antonietti,
2013) due to the decomposition of phenolic compounds, creates molecular
hydrogen from the precursor hydro-aromatic structure determining further reaction
sites (and thus higher carbon yield) (Uçar, Erdem, Tay, & Karagöz, 2009)
(Ashourirad, Demir, Smith, Gupta, & El-Kaderi, 2018).
2.4 Activated carbon use
In this chapter, the actual main applications of AC-based products are reported.
2.4.1 Gas and water cleaning
A typical and probably most known application of AC is related to the cleaning of
gaseous and liquid streams.
Different ACs with different specific surfaces and different functional groups
show different performances when interacting with different pollutant materials.
Thus, research in recent years has tried to tailor AC in order to increase the
efficiency of removing a target substance (Yin, Aroua, & Daud, 2007). These types
of treatment are as follows:
– Chemical modification through acid, basic treatment, oxidizers, or
impregnation with a foreign material.
– Physical modification through heat treatment (oxygen decrease).
– Biological modification through the growing of biofilm on the surface
(bioadsorption).
Acid treatment is performed to improve the chelation ability of metals, with the
drawback of reducing the surface area and pore volume. Dispersed and not-paired
π electrons and adsorbed molecular oxygen concur with the functionalization.
Acid treatment using nitric acid and ammonium persulphate have shown
incremental effects in carboxylic, lactonic, and phenolic groups for the removal of
copper, mercury cadmium, nickel, zinc, and lead. Treatment with hydrochloric acid
showed an improvement in the chelation of Cr (VI) (Park & Jang, 2002).
39
Considering oxidizers, treatment with hydrogen peroxide showed an increase
in the oxygen groups on the surface of AC (Gómez-Serrano, Acedo-Ramos, López-
Peinado, & Valenzuela-Calahorro, 1994).
Adsorption favors fast oxidation of biodegradable organic material, but the
biofilm can reduce diffusion inside the porosity of AC.
2.4.2 Food processing
One of the most used applications of AC is for food processing. AC is used, e.g.,
for the purification and decolorization of liquid sugars and starch-based sweeteners
used in soft drinks. Decolorization is also important for producing white sugar
crystals from sugar cane syrup (Aljohani et al., 2018; Çelebi & Kincal, 2007). In
the production of alcohol, AC is used to purify the ingredients and eliminate odors
and turbidity from the (Cai, Rice, Koziel, Jenks, & van Leeuwen, 2016; Onuki et
al., 2015). Melanoidins and polyphenols are removed with AC during the
production of juices, while a high purification of gluconates and lactates in
biochemical food products is also achieved with AC (Liakos & Lazaridis, 2016).
PAH and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are removed from fish and vegetable
oils with AC as well (Gong, Alef, Wilke, & Li, 2007; Maes et al., 2005).
2.4.3 Support for catalysts
The application of carbon and AC as a catalyst have been well known since the
early part of the previous century (Larsen & Walton, 1940). Typically, this process
can be identified as impregnation with a foreign material when a catalytic metal is
placed on the AC surface. To obtain an AC-supported catalyst, different methods
have been developed (e.g., dry impregnation, incipient wetness impregnation,
ultrasonic impregnation, microwave-assisted impregnation, immobilization, etc.).
The applications of AC-based catalysts are referred normally to heterogeneous
catalytic reactions. Some of these reactions are already applied industrially: Some
examples include the Fischer Tropsch process to produce fuels from CO and H2 (on
Co-Fe/C catalyst), fatty acid hydrogenation (e.g., Bazzi process Pd/C), selective
nitrobenzene hydrogenation (Pt-V/C), and the reductive alkylation process to
produce secondary and tertiary amines from primary amines (Pt-Pd/C). Other
processes involving carbon-based catalysts include the hydrogenation of
dinitrotoluene to toluenediamine (Pd/C), butadiene to butadiene (e.g., BP Lurgi
process on Pd-Ag-Re/C catalyst or Mitsubishi process on Pd-Te/C), and the
40
purification of terephthalic acid (base chemical for PET on Pd/C) (Serp &
Figueiredo, 2008).
2.4.4 Electrical applications
AC is also used in applications related to the construction of capacitors and hybrid
battery-capacitor dispositives. The capability of AC to work as charge storage due
to its high surface areas and small distances between the surfaces which increases
the capacitance is very well known (Kumar, Gaikwad, Mayyas, Sahajwalla, & Joshi,
2018). In the charging process, the negatively charged plate attracts the cations
while in the positively charged electrode increases the number of anions. Using
ionic liquids as electrolytes (e.g., tetrafluoroborates) demonstrated the possibility
of increasing the voltage from 0.8 V, which is the typical value for aqueous medium,
to 2.5 V (Sato, Masuda, & Takagi, 2004). The capacitance Eq. (1) shows the
correlation between the permittivity ε of the separator and the electrical double
layer, which lies on the high surface area S at the nanometric distance d.
𝐶 𝜀 (1)
In Fig. 10, a scheme of the electrical charge in a capacitor is shown. Materials with
non-symmetrical morphology composition, such as AC, polymers, or metal oxides,
increase the operating voltage (Frackowiak, 2007)
Fig. 10. Carbon-based capacitor scheme.
41
Furthermore, AC with nitrogen and oxygen groups on the surface showed enhanced
capacitance (Rennie & Hall, 2013). Recent works have tried to couple the higher
energy density of the chemical batteries with the higher power density of the AC-
based capacitors (Sun et al., 2017).
2.4.5 Other applications
A further application for AC concerns carbon dioxide adsorption. As said before,
CO2 emissions represents the major source for greenhouse gas pollutants. Typically,
zeolites have been investigated for this function, but recent studies have shown that
surface-functionalized AC can be an option for selectively separating and adsorbing
carbon dioxide (Shafeeyan, Daud, Houshmand, & Shamiri, 2010). The acidic
nature of CO2 indicates a basic functionalized surface as a possible choice. In
particular, AC with nitrogen groups (introduced mainly through NH3, nitric acid,
or amines) on the surface generated promising results in capturing carbon dioxide
even though this process influences porosity distribution; thus, reducing the
micropores is more suitable for the adsorption (Plaza, Pevida, Arenillas, Rubiera,
& Pis, 2007)
AC also has applications in the military and defense sector, where equipment
protecting against CBRN (chemical, biological, radioactive, and nuclear) agents
has been developed. The same consideration is valid for civil purposes in nuclear
power plant HVAC filtering, where nuclear grade AC is tested for the adsorption of
methyl iodide and is typically impregnated with triethylenediamine, which protects
against ionizing radiation (Park, Park, Lee, & Moon, 1995). The medical use of AC
is very well known e.g., as an adsorbant against poisoning agents and toxins
(Danish & Ahmad, 2018b). Dextran-coated AC has shown potential for use in
hemoperfusion applications (Howell et al., 2016). In laboratory analysis, AC is
used, e.g., for the determination of AOX (adsorbable organic halides).
42
43
3 Materials and Methods
3.1 Materials used for carbonization and activation
The materials (i.e., peat and sawdust) reported in this chapter were used in this
research for carbonization and activation. All the materials were provided by local
companies.
3.1.1 Sawdust, peat, and woodchips
Peat extracted from Finnish peatland was used in this research. The sample was
stored in a sealed plastic container at room temperature before use. The peat
prepared for physical activation was previously dried for 24 h at 105 °C then
introduced carbonized and activated in the reactor.
Wood sawdust from silver birch (Betula pendula), Norway spruce (Picea
abies), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) was used for carbonization, activation, and
extraction. The selection of these tree typologies was made according to the “zero
miles” approach comprising 99% of all Finnish forests (67% Pine, 22% Spruce, 10%
Birch, 1% other broadleaves) (Parviainen & Västilä, 2011). The samples were
stored in plastic bags at room temperature before use. The sawdust, before being
processed, was dried for 24 h at 105 °C, then introduced into the reactor, where it
was carbonized and activated. In Fig. 11, the sawdust and peat samples used are
shown.
Fig. 11. a) birch sawdust, b) spruce sawdust, c) pine sawdust, and d) peat from Northern
Finland peatland.
The actual technical standard normative concerning the wood chips is the UNI EN
ISO 17225. According to the normative, the characterization considers three main
44
aspects: the particle size P defined according to UNI EN ISO 17827-1 (ISO, 2016),
the moisture content M UNI EN ISO 18134-1/2 (ISO, 2015b, 2017) and the ash
content according to UNI EN ISO 18122 (ISO, 2015a). The particle size identified
from the normative varies from 5 to 100 mm, and the moisture content is divided
into three subcategories: M15 containing less than 10 wt.% water; M20 containing
less than 20 wt.% water; and M25 containing less than 25 wt.% water. Wood chips
from birch and spruce were used for carbonization and activation studies. The chips
were sieved to three different sizes: 2 mm, 6 mm, and 2 cm (in Fig. 12, an example
of 2 cm wood chips from spruce is shown). In the carbonization and activation
studies, the chips were processed as received (Ar) with a standard value of M25
and dried (D) with a standard value of M10 for 24 h at 105 °C.
Fig. 12. Spruce woodchips 2 cm in size.
3.2 Pre-treatments and activation
In this section, the pre-treatment of the raw material and the activation methods
performed to obtain the AC are presented.
3.2.1 Acetic acid extraction
Demineralization was performed on the sawdust samples for four hours using 3.5
M of acetic acid (Sigma Aldrich 100% pure glacial) as an extracting agent. Aliquots
45
of each wood species were transferred into cellulose thimbles of the Soxhlet
extraction unit. In Fig. 13, the sawdust extraction setup is shown.
Fig. 13. Acetic acid Soxhlet extraction.
Sawdust less than 2 mm in size was selected for the extraction. After
demineralization, the samples were suction-filtered on glass filters and washed with
distilled water until the pH of the filtrates was neutral. Finally, the samples were
dried for 24 h at 105 °C in an oven equipped with mechanical convection.
3.2.2 Physical activation
The hardware available for the physical activation was as follows:
– stainless-steel screening reactor placed in a tubular oven (Nabertherm GmbH
RT 50/250/13-P320) with the possibility of direct injection of water-steam
through a volumetric pump,
– rotating quartz reactor inserted in a tubular oven (Nabertherm GmbH RSRB
80-750/11) as shown in Fig. 14.
During the carbonization step, the reactor temperature was incremented from room
temperature levels to distinct temperature levels at different heating rates. The
atmosphere inside the reactor remained inert due to the continuous flushing of
protective gas (nitrogen). When the target temperature was reached, the inert
atmosphere was changed to an activating atmosphere by feeding CO2 or steam into
46
the reactor for a specified time. Following the activation step, the samples were
cooled down to room temperature in a nitrogen atmosphere overnight and then
recovered. A mass flow regulator mounted on the input of the reactor tube
controlled the flow of the protective gas.
Fig. 14. Carbonization and activation setup. (1) Nitrogen line, (2) gas control valves, (3)
mass flow controller, (4) nitrogen-pressurized water tank vessel and water line control
valve, (5) evaporator and steam + nitrogen carrier line, (6) oven PLC, (7)
screening/testing reactor and oven, (8) cascade temperature thermocoupler, (9) oven
and quartz reactor, (10) rotating system, (11) first stadium water bubbling separator, (12)
second stadium cooler and cooling condenser system.
47
In Fig. 15, the setup for physical activation is presented. The yield from the process
for each run was calculated by dividing the mass of carbon produced from the initial
mass of the starting material.
Fig. 15. The design scheme of the carbon activation hardware (Under CC BY Paper IV ©
2019 Authors).
The activating gas (steam) was produced in a Controlled Evaporator mixer
(Bronkhorst) maintained at 140 °C, and water was fed into the evaporator through
a mass flow controller (Bronkhorst). The steam was transferred to the reactor
through a heated transfer line using nitrogen gas as a carrier. The process
parameters used for control were holding time, oven temperature, heating rate,
steam flow, rotation speed, nitrogen flow, and initial mass of biomass used.
3.2.3 Chemical activation
In the chemical activation process, typically, the biomass is first impregnated with
a solution containing the chemical activating agent, after which it is dried in an
oven, then heated in a furnace, with rather lower temperatures (400 to 600 °C)
compared to physical activation, under an inert atmosphere (nitrogen atmosphere).
In the case of chemical activation, important factors include the correct mass to
carbon ratio needed to avoid excessive consumption of reagents and a proper
48
activation temperature, which can vary according to the type of chemical agent
used.
In this research, the samples were prepared by adding a known amount of
biomass and zinc chloride solution to an 800 mL beaker. Under mechanical stirring,
the prepared solution was heated to 85 °C for 3 h in order to complete the chemical
impregnation. Deionized water was added into the solution at various time intervals
to prevent it from completely drying out. The impregnated biomass was then dried
at 105 °C for 24 h in an oven with natural convection.
The impregnated samples were crushed in a mortar and placed in a stainless-
steel fixed-bed reactor. The reactor was settled in a tubular heating oven
(Nabertherm GmbH RT 50/250/13-P320) for carbonization. During the heating
process, the reactor was flushed with an inert gas (nitrogen) in order to avoid
oxidation. The oven temperature was increased from room temperature to the final
temperatures to obtain the final AC. The chemical activating agent remaining in the
sample after carbonization was removed by refluxing the sample with 3 M of HCl
for 1 h. The carbon was filtered and washed with distilled water until a neutral
filtrate was obtained. The AC was finally oven-dried overnight at 105 °C.
3.3 Characterization
In this chapter, the methods used for the quantification of the produced material
properties are presented.
3.3.1 Moisture, total carbon content, yield
The moisture content percent was calculated as the dried mass at 105°C for 24 h
and the initial raw sample mass as shown in the Eq. (2).
𝑚𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 % ∗ 100 (2)
The mass yield from each sample was calculated as the mass of AC divided by the
mass of the initial dry sample as shown in Eq. (3).
𝑦𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 % ∗ 100 (3)
The percentage of total carbon present in each sample was measured using a Skalar
Primacs MCS instrument (Fig. 16). Dried samples were weighted in quartz
49
crucibles and then combusted at 1100 °C in a pure oxygen atmosphere, after which
the formed CO2 was analyzed by an IR analyzer built in the Skalar Formacs
analyzer. Carbon content values were obtained by reading the signal of the IR
analyzer from a calibration curve derived from known masses of a standard
substance, citric acid. The carbon content of the individual samples was calculated
as a percent of the initially weighted mass.
Fig. 16. Skalar Primacs MCS for the total carbon analysis.
3.3.2 Surface areas and pore size distribution
The specific surface areas and pore size distributions were determined from the
adsorption-desorption isotherms using nitrogen as the adsorbate. Determinations
were performed with a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument (Fig. 17). Portions of
each sample (100–200 mg) were degassed at low pressure (2 µm Hg) and at a
temperature of 140 °C for 2 h to clean the surfaces and remove any adsorbed gas.
Adsorption isotherms were obtained by immersing sample tubes in liquid nitrogen
(-196 °C) to achieve constant temperature conditions. Gaseous nitrogen was then
added to the samples in small doses, and the resulting isotherms were obtained.
Specific surface areas were calculated from adsorption isotherms according to the
BET method (Brunauer, Emmett, & Teller, 1938), while nitrogen adsorption was
used to calculate the pore size distribution using the DFT (Density Functional
Theory) and BJH model (Barrett, Joyner, & Halenda, 1951). For the analysis of the
micropores, deBoer’s t-plot statistical thickness method was chosen (Lippens & de
Boer, 1965).
With the instrumental setup used, micropores down to 1.5 nm in diameter could
be measured even when smaller pores were included in the first point measured.
50
According to the IUPAC notation, the partial volume contributions from
micropores < 2 nm, mesopores 2–50 nm, and macropores > 50 nm were considered
(Thommes et al., 2015b) and related as a percent to the total pore volume.
Fig. 17. Micromeritics ASAP 2020 used for nitrogen adsorption.
3.3.3 Adsorptive properties
The adsorptive properties of the AC were tested using the adsorption of dyes (such
as methylene blue (MB) and orange II (OII)) into the pores. A solution containing
300 mg of dye per liter of H2O was prepared, and 100 mL of this solution was then
transferred into 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. Next, 50 mg of AC was added, and the
solutions were continuously agitated for 24 h to achieve equilibrium between
adsorption and desorption of the test dye. Portions of each solution were filtered
and diluted if needed. The absorbance of the solution was measured at different
wavelengths (e.g. 664 nm for MB and 485 nm for OII) on a Shimadzu UV-1700
double-beam spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). The concentrations of the solution
were calculated from calibration lines obtained with known dye concentrations.
The absorbed mass (qm) was calculated for each compound using Eq. (4), and the
percent MB and OII removed was calculated using Eq. (5):
𝑞 𝐶𝑜 𝐶𝑡 ∗ 𝑉/𝑚 (4)
% 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑑 ∗ 100 (5)
51
where C0 is the initial concentration of the dye (300 mg/L), Ct is the measured
concentration (mg/L) after 24 h, V is the volume of dye solution used (L), and m is
the mass of the AC used (mg).
3.3.4 Other characterizations
Elemental analysis for measuring the hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen content was
performed with the Flash 2000 CHNS-O Organic elemental analyzer produced by
Thermo Scientific. The ground sample was first weighted to 1.5–3.5 mg and dried
for 1 h at 105 °C. Then, the sample was placed in the analyzer and mixed with 10
mg of vanadium pentoxide V2O5 to enhance the burning. The prepared sample was
then combusted at a temperature of 960 °C for 600 s using a standard methionine
for the hydrogen and nitrogen, while the standard used for oxygen was BBOT 2,5-
(Bis (5-tert-butyl-2-benzo-axazol-2-yl) thiophene. Plain tin cups were used as a
bypass (3 pcs) when starting the measurements.
The wood chemical composition was determined according to the method
described by Rowell, Pettersen, and Tshabalala (2012), Yokoyama, Kadla, and
Chang (2002), and Styarini, Risanto, Aristiawan, and Sudiyani (2012), and it is
described in detail in Paper VI.
The metal contents of samples (ashes) were measured by inductively coupled
optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) using a Perkin Elmer Optima 5300 DV
ICP–OES instrument: 0.10-0.12 g of samples were added in 63% nitric acid and
hydrogen peroxide, then digested in a microwave oven (MARS, CEM Corporation)
at 200 °C for 10 min. After digestion, the solution was diluted to 50 mL and
measured by ICP-OES.
The microstructures of the raw materials, the intermediates, and the AC were
revealed in FESEM images, which were obtained using a Zeiss Sigma field
emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) in the Centre of Microscopy and
Nanotechnology at the University of Oulu, operated at 5 kV.
3.3.5 Experimental design
The experimental design for optimizing chemical processes is relatively new, even
though the theory of multivariate analysis has been well known for more than 70
years (Craig & Fisher, 1936).
The design of experiments can be defined as a rigorous and systematic
mathematical and statistical tool to organize and minimize experiments in order to
52
understand how parameters affect one or multiple response variables. The design
of experiments generates a model that can be useful for interpreting and optimizing
the process parameters to achieve a statistically predetermined output value.
The fractional factorial design is a design containing combinations of variables.
It is a two-level design that can have III, IV, V or more levels of resolution. The
level of resolution depends on the number of runs selected. The fitting of the model
was made through the partial least square (PLS) method, which takes into account
the covariance of multiple responses to achieve a multivariate analysis.
After completing the selection of the main parameters affecting the whole
process, a minimum and maximum range for each parameter was identified. From
a factor list of seven process parameters, an experimental matrix was generated
from the software following fractional factorial resolution IV fitted with PLS
regression. The number of experiments resulting in the screening mode was 19 (2(7-
3) + 3 repetitions with intermediate values). The values of the process parameters
were specified in a range with minimum and maximum points. The experiments
were performed following a random sequence in order to maintain stochastic
independence between each experiment and avoid bias (Cox & Reid, 2002). Modde
9.1 by Umetrics was used to process the data.
53
4 Results and discussion
4.1 Research review of recent AC studies
AC has been used as an adsorbant for many years (the first historical recognition
of its adsorptive properties dates back to 1773 from Pomeranian chemist Carl
Wilhelm). The first industrial product under the name of Eponit was
commercialized from 1911 by the Austro-Hungarian company, Fanto Works (Gupta,
2018). Recently, new discoveries in other applications have led to growing interest
in the surface chemistry analysis and specific property manipulation of AC.
In particular, new environmental regulations have boosted economic interest
in the field to produce more selective and efficient products and to improve
production and regeneration processes (e.g., microwave irradiation,
electrochemical regeneration, bio-regeneration, etc.) (Ao et al., 2018; El Gamal,
Mousa, El-Naas, Zacharia, & Judd, 2018; McQuillan, Stevens, & Mumford, 2018).
Furthermore, the need to apply the principle of maximum sustainability and cost
saving to production has pushed research in the direction of using waste materials
from other productions.
In Paper, I, a preliminary evaluation of physically AC and chemically AC is
carried out.
Concerning carbonization, the following was compared:
– Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC), where the process takes place at a
relatively low temperature (180–220 °C) in an autoclave (pressurized) with the
raw material in water suspension.
– Dry Pyrolysis (DP), where the process takes place at a higher temperature (>
500 °C) in an inert but non-pressurized atmosphere.
The main advantages of the HTC process are the lower temperature involved and
the higher achievable yield (reduced production of sidestream products, e.g., tars).
Its disadvantages are the high vapor pressure with relative risk and the need to
separate and dry the final carbon from the water.
On the other hand, DP, which has a higher tar production and involves a higher
temperature, results in a process that is easier to scale up. Furthermore, the gas
produced from DP can be reused to produce energy.
Concerning activation, physical and chemical activations were compared in
reference to previous case studies. Testing with carbon residue from gasification
physically activated with CO2 and chemically activated with ZnCl2 has been
54
studied. For chemical activation, different activating agents have been considered,
such as HCl, H2SO4, ZnCl2, KOH, and HNO3. The aim was not only to compare
and verify the process parameters and the effectivity of activation agents but also
to comprehend the point of zero charges (pHZPC), which is an important parameter
for characterizing the anionic or cationic behavior of the AC.
The carbon residue has been tested in the adsorption of different compounds,
such as phosphates, nitrates, iron (II), copper (II), and nickel (II). A high variation
in chemisorption affinity correlated with the starting material type can be seen.
4.2 Difference between one- and two-stage physical activation
A comparison between one-stage and two-stage steam activation was investigated
to determine whether AC characteristics are influenced by the carbonization-to-
activation delayed time. It must be noted, however, that this was only a preliminary
analysis because not many studies in this area have been carried out.
An important assumption, in this case, was made because confronting plant-
scale with laboratory-scale production can introduce some uncertainty about the
comparability of the process. Regardless, comparing industrial production with the
laboratory setup design was an important evaluation.
The two-step activation samples of already carbonized birch and spruce from
a carbonization plant were activated and compared to the AC carbon produced from
the same raw material but from virgin wood. The choice of activating the carbon
through one-step or two-step activation presents some differences. The total yields
are higher for the two-stage process compared to the one-stage process.
Pre-carbonization leads to rather high yields for the activation step because
most of the volatile fractions are removed during carbonization, but the total yields
are at the same level for both procedures. Longer steam activations lead to lower
yields, affecting the one-stage process more than the two-stage process. All AC
produced in the two-stage process is lower in terms of specific surface areas
compared to AC produced in a one-stage process; this difference occurs
independent of the activation times used, even if longer activation times, in general,
produce higher specific surface areas.
55
Fig. 18. A) BET SSA, B) Langmuir SSA, C) t-plot Micropore SSA, D) t-plot External SSA,
E) DFT Pore Volume, F) DFT PSD, G) Adsorption isotherm comparison for spruce, H)
Adsorption isotherm comparison for birch I) Adsorption isotherms of only carbonized
samples. (Under CC BY Paper II © 2018 Authors).
As can be seen in Fig. 18, the BET SSA indicates a higher surface area value for
one-stage activation, which is also confirmed by the Langmuir and t-plot models.
The PSD analysis seems to indicate that mesoporous AC is obtained in a two-stage
process when compared with a one-stage process. This result is also evident
through the DFT model and the adsorption isotherms, where the one-stage process
presents a Type I profile, while the two-stage process presents a Type II profile.
The carbonized material presents a small surface area mainly composed of
micropores.
The subsequent steam activation further develops micro-mesoporosity. But this
process happens in a distinct way when comparing the one-stage and two-stage
processes. While in a one-stage process, the isotherm profile follows a more
uniform development in micropore and mesopore formation, in a two-stage process,
mesoporosity seems to be favored. Why this occurs is not yet clear, and thus only
speculative explanations can be given at present. The most probable explanation is
56
the different chemical composition of the AC due to aging and a possible synergic
effect of decomposition-activation during the one-stage process.
Further investigations in this direction could also explain whether AC is a
chemically stable material or undergoes, to a certain extent, a chemical change
process.
4.3 Particle size initial humidity and acetic acid extraction
In Paper III, possible biomass pre-treatments before carbonization and activation,
as well as how these pre-treatments can affect the final characteristics of the AC,
are investigated.
In particular, grinding (i.e., particle size), moisture content (pre-drying), and
acid extraction have been considered. The choice of these parameters depends on
the possible operative plant-scale scenario used to examine whether this pre-
treatment can somehow affect the quality of the final product. Particle size can be
of interest from the logistical point of view, because moving woodchip-size
particles can be more practical than moving particles in a powder form.
Pre-drying, on the other hand, can be considered an opportune pre-treatment to
avoid an excess of liquids in the out stream and thereby reduce the mass of possible
wastes to treat. Acid treatment has been considered because it is a process used to
reduce mineral content in the final product (ashes). In this particular case, the
extraction was carried out from the raw material, even though post-treatment
directly on the produced AC is still a practical option.
57
Fig. 19. Comparison between different particle sizes and moisture content samples. A)
BET SSA, B) Langmuir SSA, C) t-plot Micropore SSA, D) t-plot External SSA, E) DFT
Pore Volume, F) DFT PSD. (Paper III).
As evidenced in Fig. 19, there is a negligible difference between the AC SSA and
PSD because of initial moisture and particle size. These results can lead to the
conclusion that pre-treatments like milling or drying do not affect the final
produced AC pore size distribution. The morphology and initial moisture content
do not affect the porous structure, which in turn suggests that in potential industrial-
scale production, powder risk or the quantity of liquid wastes can be reduced
without affecting the final product characteristics.
58
Fig. 20. FESEM images of a) untreated birch sawdust, b) untreated spruce sawdust, c)
acetic acid-extracted birch sawdust and d) acetic acid-extracted spruce sawdust.
Another type of pre-treatment considered is the acid extraction of wood. This
investigation was conducted to demonstrate how a possible interaction between an
acid (e.g., from fermentation) could change the final AC characteristics. Acid
extraction is a common method used to reduce the metal content in carbon and also
to separate extractives from wood. In particular, acetic acid has been used because
of its greener nature and its growing use in the treatment of wood through
acetylation, i.e., to preserve wood from degradation. This process takes place by
substituting the free hydroxyls groups present on the wood surface, which generally
reacts with water and is easily accessible to the wood enzymes with less digestible
acetyl groups (Rowell & Dickerson, 2014). In Fig. 20, the FESEM images of the
treated and untreated sawdust are shown.
In Fig. 21, the difference between AC from untreated sawdust and acetic acid-
extracted sawdust is depicted. As can be seen from the DFT pore size distribution
59
and the adsorption isotherms, acetylation induces a higher formation of micropores
in the AC. This result is also confirmed by the t-plot model. The DFT total pore
volume results in much higher mesoporous AC, predicting a high SSA to volume
ratio. In this case, it is possible to observe that the acetic acid pre-treatment allows
the tailoring of more microporous AC, changing the chemical structure of the
starting biomass.
Fig. 21. Comparison between untreated and acetic acid-extracted sawdust. A) BET SSA,
B) Langmuir SSA, C) t-plot Micropore SSA, D) t-plot External SSA, E) DFT Pore Volume,
F) DFT PSD, G) Adsorption Isotherms. (Under CC BY Paper III © 2018 Authors).
4.4 Parameters affecting biomass carbonization and activation
In Paper IV, optimization of the process parameters of physical activation was
performed through the design of experiments. The biomass source material used
was peat. The choice of the parameters was made according to the hardware setup.
These controllable parameters were holding time, oven temperature, steam flow
rate, heating rate, reactor rotation speed, biomass initial mass, and nitrogen flow.
As can be seen in Fig. 22, an experimental matrix was generated that combined the
maximum and minimum level of each parameter (factor). The execution of the
60
experiment was performed following a randomly generated sequence in order to
reduce bias.
Table 3. Experimental matrix generated according to the factorial design. (Under CC BY
Paper IV © 2019 Authors).
Exp
No
Exp
Name
Run
Order
Incl/Ex Holding
time (min)
Oven
temperature
(°C)
Steam
flow
(g/h)
Heating
rate
(°C/min)
Rotation
(rpm)
Biomass
mass initial
(g)
Nitrogen
flow
(ml/min)
1 N1 8 Incl 60 700 30 2.6 4.36 100 100
2 N2 15 Incl 240 700 30 2.6 17.44 100 300
3 N3 18 Incl 60 800 30 2.6 17.44 300 100
4 N4 6 Incl 240 800 30 2.6 4.36 300 300
5 N5 3 Incl 60 700 120 2.6 17.44 300 300
6 N6 17 Incl 240 700 120 2.6 4.36 300 100
7 N7 19 Incl 60 800 120 2.6 4.36 100 300
8 N8 12 Incl 240 800 120 2.6 17.44 100 100
9 N9 11 Incl 60 700 30 13 4.36 300 300
10 N10 7 Incl 240 700 30 13 17.44 300 100
11 N11 14 Incl 60 800 30 13 17.44 100 300
12 N12 13 Incl 240 800 30 13 4.36 100 100
13 N13 4 Incl 60 700 120 13 17.44 100 100
14 N14 5 Incl 240 700 120 13 4.36 100 300
15 N15 1 Incl 60 800 120 13 4.36 300 100
16 N16 9 Incl 240 800 120 13 17.44 300 300
17 N17 10 Incl 150 750 75 7.8 10.9 200 200
18 N18 2 Incl 150 750 75 7.8 10.9 200 200
19 N19 16 Incl 150 750 75 7.8 10.9 200 200
The prepared AC samples were then characterized by a number of methods that
generated the response matrix. Responses included in the matrix were the yield, the
BET surface area, the total carbon, the pore volume by BET, DFT micropores, DFT
mesopores, the DFT total pore volume, and the nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen
content. The results were elaborated through the MODDE 9.1 software by Umetrics.
Regarding the holding time, it is possible to observe a direct correlation with
the BET surface. The same effect occurs with the pore size distribution responses
involved with a higher increase in mesopores. This result indicates that the holding
time interval is one of the most important parameters in porosity production. An
61
oven temperature from 700 to 800 °C slightly increases the porosity, with a more
evident effect on mesoporosity. The oven temperature seems to influence the
morphology more so than the absolute value of the pore volume. The impact of
steam flow is peculiar in the process. This result demonstrates that physical
activation with steam is a widening process in which micropores are generated in
the first phase and, in the second phase, mesopores are formed.
Oxygen content is increased by steam flow, indicating that water oxygenates
the AC, likely creating functional groups on the surface. Meanwhile, the heating
rate has an impact on the adsorption properties. The fastest ramping times seem to
induce microporosity formation. The final AC yield result is not affected by the
heating rate. A possible explanation for this is that energy and a time-consuming
ramp (>1h) are not beneficial for obtaining higher AC yields.
The rotation speed has an influence on micro-mesoporosity formation. The
better efficiency of the interface gas–particle surface interaction along with parallel
mechanical milling stress favors pore production. With the lab-scale production, it
is possible to identify a “scale effect” on the quantity of AC produced. The result
shows that it is possible to detect a scaling gradient effect on the order of a 1.4%
yield increase within the interval 100–300 g biomass mass. Inert gas flow (nitrogen)
is another parameter that was investigated in order to determine whether interaction
occurred with the final nitrogen content in the sample. The results showed that at
the process parameter level considered, nitrogen flow does not affect the nitrogen
content in the material. Furthermore, nitrogen does not affect the porosity
parameters, except for a slight reduction in mesopore formation. A better yield was
achieved with a higher nitrogen flow. This result suggests that a higher protective
atmosphere can “smoothen” the oxidation process.
In Fig. 23, the results of normalized process parameter effects on the responses
are reported.
62
Fig. 22. Normalized plot effect of the different process parameters affecting each
response (N= number of experiments, DF= degree of freedom, Cond.no.= condition
number). (Under CC BY Paper IV © 2019 Authors).
4.4.1 AC from peat design of experiment and parameter modeling
and optimization
The final aim of the multivariate analysis was to build a simulation model valuable
for the parameter range selected. To determine whether the model could be used
for tailoring the AC properties, it was set with the target to produce a maximized
yield and either microporous or mesoporous AC. The model simulated the relative
process parameter set values that were subsequently run in a validation experiment.
In Table 3, the input values necessary for the experimental setup are listed;
while in Table 4, a relative comparison between the predicted values and the actual
values produced by the validation experiments is shown. The results achieved show
a very realistic simulation in the microporous AC scenario (75.64% predicted vs.
71.65% observed) and a slight overestimation (around 17%) in the case of
mesoporous AC (63.52% predicted vs. 46.47% observed), with an evident general
increase of mesopores.
63
Table 4. Process parameters of the model to produce optimized yield AC from peat with
either high mesopore or high micropore distribution.
Targets Sample
Holding
time
(min)
Oven
temperature
(°C)
Steam
flow
(g/h)
Heating
rate
(°C/min)
Rotation
(rpm)
Biomass
mass
initial (g)
Nitrogen
flow
(ml/min)
Max Yield Validation1
Max
Micro
Min
Meso
Max
PV Prediction 120.09 752.0 90.45 13.00 4.36 240.95 288.06
Observed 120.00 753.0 90.50 13.00 4.36 241.00 288.00
Max Yield Validation2
Min
Micro
Max
Meso
Max
PV Prediction 90.47 799.6 83.11 6.84 17.44 100.00 278.98
Observed 90.00 800.0 83.10 6.84 17.44 100.00 279.00
Table 5. Predicted model compared to measured results.
4.5 Chemical activation with ZnCl2
The chemical activation was completed using zinc chloride as an activating agent
and peat as a raw material. As said previously, ZnCl2 interacts with the biomass at
a certain temperature level, creating the porous structure. What is presented in
Paper V is an optimization of the different masses of biomass to the mass of the
activating agent ratio and the activation temperature. In Fig. 24, the results of the
different AC produced from peat are reported. As it is possible to see that the TC
increases with higher temperatures, the yield is also affected by high temperatures.
The BET SSA resulted in a high value for an impregnation ratio, from ½ to 1, while
higher ratios tended to reduce the specific surface. High ZnCl2 ratios and high
Targets Sample Yield
(%)
BET
surface
(m2/g)
TC
(%)
Pore
volume
BET
(cm3/g)
DFT
micro
(cm3/g)
DFT
meso
(cm3/g)
DFT
total V
(cm3/g)
DFT
Micro
(%)
DFT
Meso
(%)
Max Yield Validation1
Max
Micro
Min
Meso
Max
PV
Prediction 25.8 497 85.58 0.17 0.16 0.05 0.21 75.64 23.78
Observed 20.0 518 83.96 0.28 0.16 0.06 0.23 71.65 27.99
Max Yield Validation2
Min
Micro
Max
Meso
Max
PV
Prediction 27.4 359 74.87 0.11 0.09 0.16 0.26 36.09 63.52
Observed 21.0 579 87.70 0.39 0.17 0.15 0.31 53.53 46.47
64
temperatures favor mesoporosity formation. In the dye adsorption test, the anionic
dye was more readily adsorbed.
Fig. 23. Comparison of the chemically activated carbon from peat as a function of
different temperature and biomass to chemical mass ratio. A) TC, B) Yield, C) BET SSA,
D) DFT Pore Volume, E) DFT PSD, F) Dye adsorption comparison of methylene blue MB
and Orange II. (Paper V).
4.6 Properties of biomass waste-derived AC
Another part of the research was the study and determination of how some
characteristics of the starting biomass used could affect the PSD and the adsorptive
performances of the AC produced. In this case, sawdust from birch, pine, and
spruce was analyzed. The results are presented in Fig. 25.
The content of hemicellulose-cellulose-lignin was determined through
different methods (Rowell, 2005; Styarini et al., 2012; Yokoyama et al., 2002),
which resulted in a higher level of cellulose and lignin in pine, whereas a higher
65
content of hemicellulose was found in birch. The ash analysis indicates a high
content of Ca, K, and Mg, with a relevant content of P, in the case of birch wood.
Fig. 24. Wood analysis. A) Wood composition, B) Ash content in w/w % on dry wood, C)
Ash metal composition, D) AC from birch adsorption performance of methylene blue
MB, gentian violet GV, metal zinc, nitrate, sulfate, and phosphate ions. (Paper VI).
The biomasses were then carbonized and activated following a physical one-stage
procedure with steam. For comparison, a sample of lignin from the Kraft extraction
process was activated with the same method.
In the case of AC produced from birch, an adsorption test relative to common
dyes and ions was performed, resulting in high adsorption of Zn2+ and MB (cationic
dye), while lower values were achieved for phosphate and sulfate ions (PO43-,
SO42-). Considering the PSD as evidenced in Table 5, a correlation between lignin
and metal content is suggested. According to the BJH model, birch wood, which
has a lower value of lignin content, has a higher development in mesoporosity;
while pine and spruce, both possessing higher lignin content, have increased
microporosity.
66
Table 6. Pore distribution according to the BJH model. (Under CC BY Paper VI © 2017
Authors).
Sample AC BJH micropores (%) BJH mesopores (%) BJH macropores (%)
Birch 14 84 2
Spruce 18 78 4
Pine 18 76 6
The difference in ash content might indicate a possible effect on increased
mesoporosity, with spruce having a higher ash content in comparison with pine.
This suggests that an endogenous metal content in the biomass can induce some
degree of chemical activation in the final AC.
67
5 Conclusions
This research investigated the potential of producing tailored AC from waste
materials for different possible applications. Different types of raw materials were
considered, such as wood sawdust, wood chips (birch, spruce, and pine), and peat.
Physical and chemical activation were used and evaluated, determining a valuable
method to valorize the product.
The activation process can be performed in a single stage, resulting in a more
efficient method for production without reducing the quality of the AC produced.
Physical activation was demonstrated to be a greener process for activating carbon,
requiring heat and steam or carbon dioxide. Chemical activation resulted in a less
eco-friendly method but produced AC with a higher yield and more homogeneous
pore size distribution.
Controlling the production process and the pre-treatment parameters allows for
the tailoring of the final properties of AC. Important factors in the physical
activation with steam included holding time, which particularly affects the surface
area and the micro-mesoporosity, and steam, which also increases the oxygen
concentration in the final product. A pore-widening mechanism has been identified
as in which the pore size distribution develops from micropores to mesopores,
continuing the process during the activation time.
Pre-treatments, like pre-drying, showed no effect on the final carbon
characteristics, while extraction with acetic acid induced a higher formation in
micropores. At an industrial scale, it is recommended that the input mass be pre-
dried in order to avoid high water content in the condensable gas output.
For the chemical activation with zinc chloride, the key role is played by the
mass ratio with the initial biomass and the activation temperature, which is very
important for developing the porosity. The study demonstrated the importance of
detecting the right operative temperature in which the chemical activating agent
can perform better. At the industrial level, the key factor is to recover all or partially
all of the activating chemical after the activation in order to make the whole process
sustainable and environmentally friendly.
Particular importance in the evaluation of the adsorption test resulted to be not
only the specific surface area and the porosity but also the point of zero charge that
affects the functional groups on the surface and subsequently the selectivity of the
AC.
68
To conclude, high-quality activated carbon can be produced starting from local
biomass waste, lending actual technical and scalable feasibility for industrial
production or reconversion.
Table 7. A summary of the possible pros and cons of the approach used (++highly
positive, +positive, -negative, --highly negative).
Parameters Chemical activation Physical activation
Pre-treatments - + Heat consumption + - Yield + - Activating agent recovery
- +
Post washing -- + Parameter control ++ + Porosity control ++ + Process complexity - + Waste hazard (potential) -- +
69
6 Perspectives
Regarding future research, a specific characterization of the functional groups on
the surface using, e.g., FTIR-ATR with Germanium crystals, is warranted. This
characterization can increase understanding of the chelating properties of AC but
also some of its catalytic properties.
In this direction, another interesting research prospect and potential upgrade to
actual technology is the functionalization of carbon in order “to tailor” the surface
to host particular functional groups, such as nitrogen (using ammonia in the
activating stream). Interest in this field is related to the capability of amine groups
to interact with CO2. Furthermore, nitrogen-doped AC showed interesting
electronic properties (Ahmed, Rafat, & Ahmed, 2018; Li et al., 2016).
A further interest is to optimize the side stream of AC production in order to
convert all the phase products (solid liquid and syngas) into valuable products. This
investigation would be made from the perspective of more economically and
environmentally sustainable biorefinery production.
Another interesting area to develop is the understanding and optimization of
the mechanism of conversion of non-graphitizable carbon into graphitic carbon
through catalytic graphitization (e.g., catalytic graphitization using N2 plasma pre-
treated AC with Iron (III) (Shi et al., 2017) to evaluate the possibility of producing
graphene-like structures from a biomass source.
70
71
List of references
Ahmadpour, A., & Do, D. D. (1996). The preparation of active carbons from coal by chemical and physical activation. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00204-9
Ahmed, S., Rafat, M., & Ahmed, A. (2018). Nitrogen doped activated carbon derived from orange peel for supercapacitor application. Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6254/aad5d4
Aljohani, H., Ahmed, Y., El-Shafey, O., El-Shafey, S., Fouad, R., & Shoueir, K. (2018). Decolorization of turbid sugar juice from sugar factory using waste powdered carbon. Applied Water Science, 8(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0681-2
Ao, W., Fu, J., Mao, X., Kang, Q., Ran, C., Liu, Y., … Dai, J. (2018). Microwave assisted preparation of activated carbon from biomass: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.051
Arena, N., Lee, J., & Clift, R. (2016). Life Cycle Assessment of activated carbon production from coconut shells. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.073
Ashourirad, B., Demir, M., Smith, R. A., Gupta, R. B., & El-Kaderi, H. M. (2018). Rapid transformation of heterocyclic building blocks into nanoporous carbons for high-performance supercapacitors. RSC Advances, 8(22), 12300–12309. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA00546J
ASTM E1755-01. (2012). Standard Test Method for Ash in Biomass. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. https://doi.org/10.1520/E1755-01R07.2
Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L. G., & Halenda, P. P. (1951). The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations from Nitrogen Isotherms. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 73(1), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01145a126
Benedetti, V., Patuzzi, F., & Baratieri, M. (2017). Gasification Char as a Potential Substitute of Activated Carbon in Adsorption Applications. In Energy Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.380
Bhatnagar, A., Hogland, W., Marques, M., & Sillanpää, M. (2013). An overview of the modification methods of activated carbon for its water treatment applications. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.038
Brebu, M., & Vasile, C. (2010). Thermal degradation of lignin - a review. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology.
Brown, A., Kauri, T., Kushner, D. J., & Mathur, S. P. (2010). Measurement and significance of cellulose in peat soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss88-065
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938). Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 60(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a023
72
Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Gelencsér, A., Tompa, É., & Pósfai, M. (2012). Are black carbon and soot the same? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions. https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-24821-2012
Cai, L., Rice, S., Koziel, J. A., Jenks, W. S., & van Leeuwen, J. H. (2016). Further purification of food-grade alcohol to make a congener-free product. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.295
Campbell, M. M., & Sederoff, R. R. (1996). Variation in Lignin Content and Composition (Mechanisms of Control and Implications for the Genetic Improvement of Plants). Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.1.3
Çelebi, I., & Kincal, N. S. (2007). Color formation in wheat starch based glucose syrups and use of commercially available and laboratory-prepared agricultural waste-based activated carbons for decolorization. Separation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390601174232
Cheng, H. M., Endo, H., Okabe, T., Saito, K., & Zheng, G. Bin. (1999). Graphitization behavior of wood ceramics and bamboo ceramics as determined by x-ray diffraction. Journal of Porous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009684014651
Couto, N., Rouboa, A., Silva, V., Monteiro, E., & Bouziane, K. (2013). Influence of the biomass gasification processes on the final composition of syngas. In Energy Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.068
Cox, D. R., & Reid, N. (2002). The Theory of the Design of Experiments. Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1089
Craig, C. C., & Fisher, R. A. (1936). The Design of Experiments. The American Mathematical Monthly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2300364
Danish, M., & Ahmad, T. (2018a). A review on utilization of wood biomass as a sustainable precursor for activated carbon production and application. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.003
Danish, M., & Ahmad, T. (2018b). A review on utilization of wood biomass as a sustainable precursor for activated carbon production and application. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 87, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2018.02.003
De Lima, L. S., Quináia, S. P., Melquiades, F. L., De Biasi, G. E. V., & Garcia, J. R. (2014). Characterization of activated carbons from different sources and the simultaneous adsorption of Cu, Cr, and Zn from metallurgic effluent. Separation and Purification Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.11.034
El Gamal, M., Mousa, H. A., El-Naas, M. H., Zacharia, R., & Judd, S. (2018). Bio-regeneration of activated carbon: A comprehensive review. Separation and Purification Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.015
European Biochar Foundation (EBC). (2018). Guidelines for a Sustainable Production of Biochar. European Biochar Foundation (EBC), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4658.7043
Fechler, N., Fellinger, T. P., & Antonietti, M. (2013). “Salt templating”: A simple and sustainable pathway toward highly porous functional carbons from ionic liquids. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201203422
73
Fitzer, E., Kochling, K.-H., Boehm, H. P., & Marsh, H. (1995). Recommended terminology for the description of carbon as a solid (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Pure and Applied Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199567030473
Frackowiak, E. (2007). Carbon materials for supercapacitor application. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/b618139m
Franklin, R. E. (1951). Crystallite Growth in Graphitizing and Non-Graphitizing Carbons. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1951.0197
García-García, A., Gregório, A., Franco, C., Pinto, F., Boavida, D., & Gulyurtlu, I. (2003). Unconverted chars obtained during biomass gasification on a pilot-scale gasifier as a source of activated carbon production. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00266-3
Giudicianni, P., Cardone, G., & Ragucci, R. (2013). Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin slow steam pyrolysis: Thermal decomposition of biomass components mixtures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.12.026
Gómez-Serrano, V., Acedo-Ramos, M., López-Peinado, A. J., & Valenzuela-Calahorro, C. (1994). Oxidation of activated carbon by hydrogen peroxide. Study of surface functional groups by FT-i.r. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(94)90092-2
Gong, Z., Alef, K., Wilke, B. M., & Li, P. (2007). Activated carbon adsorption of PAHs from vegetable oil used in soil remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.037
Gor, G. Y., Thommes, M., Cychosz, K. A., & Neimark, A. V. (2012). Quenched solid density functional theory method for characterization of mesoporous carbons by nitrogen adsorption. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.037
Gupta, T. (2018). Historical Production and Use of Carbon Materials: The Activated Carbon BT - Carbon: The Black, the Gray and the Transparent. In T. Gupta (Ed.) (pp. 47–70). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66405-7_2
Harris, P. J. F. (2005). New perspectives on the structure of graphitic carbons. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408430500406265
Harris, P. J. F., Liu, Z., & Suenaga, K. (2008). Imaging the atomic structure of activatedcarbon. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 20(36). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/20/36/362201
Harris, P. J. F., & Tsang, S. C. (1997). High-resolution electron microscopy studies of non-graphitizing carbons. Philosophical Magazine A. https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619708214028
Howell, C. A., Sandeman, S. R., Zheng, Y., Mikhalovsky, S. V., Nikolaev, V. G., Sakhno, L. A., & Snezhkova, E. A. (2016). New dextran coated activated carbons for medical use. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.042
Huang, L., Chen, Y., Liu, G., Li, S., Liu, Y., & Gao, X. (2015). Non-isothermal pyrolysis characteristics of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.089
74
Huttunen, R. (2017). Government report on the National Energy and Climate Strategy for 2030. (R. Huttunen, Ed.). Helsinki: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland. Retrieved from http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79247/TEMjul_12_2017_verkkojulkaisu.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Isahak, W. N. R. W., Hisham, M. W. M., Yarmo, M. A., & Yun Hin, T. Y. (2012). A review on bio-oil production from biomass by using pyrolysis method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.039
ISO. (2015a). ISO 18122:2015 Solid biofuels -- Determination of ash content. Pub-ISO, (1), 6. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/61515.html
ISO. (2015b). ISO 18134-1:2015 Solid biofuels -- Determination of moisture content -- Oven dry method -- Part 1: Total moisture -- Reference method. Pub-ISO, (1), 5. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/61538.html
ISO. (2016). ISO 17827-1:2016 Solid biofuels -- Determination of particle size distribution for uncompressed fuels -- Part 1: Oscillating screen method using sieves with apertures of 3,15 mm and above. Pub-ISO, (1), 9. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/60685.html
ISO. (2017). ISO 18134-2:2017 Solid biofuels -- Determination of moisture content -- Oven dry method -- Part 2: Total moisture -- Simplified method. Pub-ISO, (2), 5. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/71536.html
Jacobson, M. Z. (2001). Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/35055518
Kambo, H. S., & Dutta, A. (2015). A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050
Kim, D. W., Kil, H. S., Kim, J., Mochida, I., Nakabayashi, K., Rhee, C. K., … Yoon, S. H. (2017). Highly graphitized carbon from non-graphitizable raw material and its formation mechanism based on domain theory. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.086
Kosa, M., Ben, H., Theliander, H., & Ragauskas, A. J. (2011). Pyrolysis oils from CO2 precipitated Kraft lignin. Green Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1gc15818j
Kumar, U., Gaikwad, V., Mayyas, M., Sahajwalla, V., & Joshi, R. K. (2018). Extraordinary supercapacitance in activated carbon produced via a sustainable approach. Journal of Power Sources, 394, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2018.05.054
Larsen, E. C., & Walton, J. H. (1940). Activated Carbon as a Catalyst in Certain Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 44(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150397a009
Li, B., Dai, F., Xiao, Q., Yang, L., Shen, J., Zhang, C., & Cai, M. (2016). Nitrogen-doped activated carbon for a high energy hybrid supercapacitor. Energy and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee03149d
Liakos, T. I., & Lazaridis, N. K. (2016). Melanoidin removal from molasses effluents by adsorption. Journal of Water Process Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.02.006
75
Liou, T. H. (2010). Development of mesoporous structure and high adsorption capacity of biomass-based activated carbon by phosphoric acid and zinc chloride activation. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.12.016
Lippens, B. C., & de Boer, J. H. (1965). Studies on pore systems in catalysts. V. The t method. Journal of Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(65)90307-6
Liu, W. J., Li, W. W., Jiang, H., & Yu, H. Q. (2017). Fates of Chemical Elements in Biomass during Its Pyrolysis. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00647
Lowenstein, T. K., & Demicco, R. V. (2006). Elevated eocene atmospheric CO2 and its subsequent decline. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129555
Maes, J., De Meulenaer, B., Van Heerswynghels, P., De Greyt, W., Eppe, G., De Pauw, E., & Huyghebaert, A. (2005). Removal of dioxins and PCB from fish oil by activated carbon and its influence on the nutritional quality of the oil. JAOCS, Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-005-1114-1
Marsh, H., & Rodríguez-Reinoso, F. (2006a). Activated Carbon (Origins). In Harry Marsh & F. Rodríguez-Reinoso (Eds.), Activated Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044463-5/50016-9
Marsh, H., & Rodríguez-Reinoso, F. (2006b). Activation Processes ( Thermal or Physical ). In Harry Marsh & F. Rodríguez-Reinoso (Eds.), Activated Carbon. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044463-5/50019-4
Marsh, H., & Rodríguez-Reinoso, F. (2006c). Activation Processes (Chemical). In Harry Marsh & F. Rodríguez-Reinoso (Eds.), Activated Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044463-5/50020-0
McQuillan, R. V., Stevens, G. W., & Mumford, K. A. (2018). The electrochemical regeneration of granular activated carbons: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.079
Montoya, J. I., Chejne-Janna, F., & Garcia-Pérez, M. (2015). Pirólisis rápida de biomasas: Una revisión de los aspectos relevantes. Parte I: Estudio paramétrico. DYNA (Colombia), 82(192), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n192.44701
Neimark, A. V., Lin, Y., Ravikovitch, P. I., & Thommes, M. (2009). Quenched solid density functional theory and pore size analysis of micro-mesoporous carbons. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.050
Nunes, L. J. R., Matias, J. C. O., & Catalão, J. P. S. (2016). Biomass combustion systems: A review on the physical and chemical properties of the ashes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.053
O’Laughlin, J., & McElligott, K. (2009). Biochar for environmental management : An introduction. In J. Lehmann & S. Joseph (Eds.), Forest Policy and Economics (Vol. 11, pp. 535–536). Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.07.001
Onuki, S., Koziel, J. A., Jenks, W. S., Cai, L., Rice, S., & Van Leeuwen, J. (2015). Ethanol purification with ozonation, activated carbon adsorption, and gas stripping. Separation and Purification Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.07.026
Oya, A., & Otani, S. (1979). Catalytic graphitization of carbons by various metals. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(79)90020-4
76
Park, S.-J., & Jang, Y.-S. (2002). Pore Structure and Surface Properties of Chemically Modified Activated Carbons for Adsorption Mechanism and Rate of Cr(VI). Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 249(2), 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1006/JCIS.2002.8269
Park, S. W., Park, H. S., Lee, W. K., & Moon, H. (1995). Effect of water vapor on adsorption of methyl iodide to triethylenediamine-impregnated activated carbons. Separations Technology, 5(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-9618(94)00104-Z
Parviainen, J., & Västilä, S. (2011). 5a/2011 State of Finland´s Forests 2011 Based on the Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management. State of Finland’s Forests 2012 Based on the Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management. Retrieved from http://www.metla.fi/metinfo/sustainability/about.htm
Pérez, J., Muñoz-Dorado, J., De La Rubia, T., & Martínez, J. (2002). Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: An overview. International Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3
Philip M. Parker. (2015). The 2016 Import and Export Market for Activated Carbon in Finland. Retrieved from https://www.icongrouponline.com/
Plaza, M. G., Pevida, C., Arenillas, A., Rubiera, F., & Pis, J. J. (2007). CO2 capture by adsorption with nitrogen enriched carbons. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.06.001
Prauchner, M. J., & Rodríguez-Reinoso, F. (2012). Chemical versus physical activation of coconut shell: A comparative study. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.040
Ramanathan, V., & Carmichael, G. (2008). Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nature Geoscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo156
Rennie, A. J. R., & Hall, P. J. (2013). Nitrogen-enriched carbon electrodes in electrochemical capacitors: Investigating accessible porosity using CM-SANS. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp52233d
Rodríguez-Reinoso, F., Molina-Sabio, M., & González, M. T. (1995). The use of steam and CO2 as activating agents in the preparation of activated carbons. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)00100-E
Rowell J. S. (2005). Cell wall chemistry. Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites, Second Edition, 35–74.
Rowell, R. M., & Dickerson, J. P. (2014). Acetylation of wood. ACS Symposium Series. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2014-1158.ch018
Rowell, R., Pettersen, R., & Tshabalala, M. (2012). Cell Wall Chemistry. In Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12487-5
Sato, T., Masuda, G., & Takagi, K. (2004). Electrochemical properties of novel ionic liquids for electric double layer capacitor applications. Electrochimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2004.03.030
77
Schmitz, B., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B., Heilmann-Clausen, C., Åberg, G., Asaro, F., & Lee, C. T. A. (2004). Basaltic explosive volcanism, but no comet impact, at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary: High-resolution chemical and isotopic records from Egypt, Spain and Denmark. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.06.017
Schröder, E., Thomauske, K., Oechsler, B., Herberger, S., Baur, S., & Hornung, A. (2011). Activated Carbon from Waste Biomass. Progress in Biomass and Bioenergy Production. https://doi.org/10.5772/20594
Serp, P., & Figueiredo, J. L. (2008). Carbon Materials for Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470403709
Shafeeyan, M. S., Daud, W. M. A. W., Houshmand, A., & Shamiri, A. (2010). A review on surface modification of activated carbon for carbon dioxide adsorption. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.07.006
Shen, D., Zhang, L., Xue, J., Guan, S., Liu, Q., & Xiao, R. (2015). Thermal degradation of xylan-based hemicellulose under oxidative atmosphere. Carbohydrate Polymers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.067
Shi, S., Zhou, X., Chen, W., Chen, M., Nguyen, T., Wang, X., & Zhang, W. (2017). Improvement of structure and electrical conductivity of activated carbon by catalytic graphitization using N2 plasma pretreatment and iron(III) loading. RSC Advances. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra07328c
Sing, K. S. W., Everett, D. H., Haul, R. A. W., Moscou, L., Pierotti, L. A., Rouquerol, J., & Siemieniewska, T. (1985). International union of pure and applied chemistry physical chemistry division reporting physisorption data for gas/soils systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chemistry, 57(4), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603
Statistics Finland. (2019). Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Greenhouse gases [e-publication]. Helsinki. https://doi.org/ISSN=1797-6065
Styarini, D., Risanto, L., Aristiawan, Y., & Sudiyani, Y. (2012). Comparison of Two Analytical Methods for Compositional Analysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Bioethanol Production. International Journal of Environment and Bioenergy.
Sun, F., Gao, J., Zhu, Y., Pi, X., Wang, L., Liu, X., & Qin, Y. (2017). A high performance lithium ion capacitor achieved by the integration of a Sn-C anode and a biomass-derived microporous activated carbon cathode. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40990
Thommes, M., Kaneko, K., Neimark, A. V., Olivier, J. P., Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., Rouquerol, J., & Sing, K. S. W. (2015a). Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 87(9–10). https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
Thommes, M., Kaneko, K., Neimark, A. V., Olivier, J. P., Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., Rouquerol, J., & Sing, K. S. W. (2015b). Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
78
Transparency Market Research. (2018). Activated Carbon Market (Raw Material - Coal based, Coconut Shell based, Wood based; Form - Powdered, Granular, Extruded; Application - Water and Wastewater Treatment, Gas and Air Treatment, Food and Beverages, Industrial Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, Minin. Retrieved from https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/activated-carbon-market.html
Tsai, P. J., Shieh, H. Y., Hsieh, L. Te, & Lee, W. J. (2001). The fate of PAHs in the carbon black manufacturing process. Atmospheric Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00093-0
Tu, R., Sun, Y., Wu, Y., Fan, X., Wang, J., Shen, X., … Xu, X. (2019). Effect of surfactant on hydrothermal carbonization of coconut shell. Bioresource Technology, 284, 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2019.03.120
Uçar, S., Erdem, M., Tay, T., & Karagöz, S. (2009). Preparation and characterization of activated carbon produced from pomegranate seeds by ZnCl2activation. Applied Surface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.06.080
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2016). Summary of the Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Vapo Oy. (2018). Vapo’s first activated carbon facility to be built in Ilomantsi. Retrieved from https://www.vapo.com/producing-peat-responsibly/news/2714/vapo_s_first_activated_carbon_facility_to_be_built_in_ilomantsi
Verified Market Research. (2018). Activated Carbon Market Growing at a CAGR of 9.1% from 2018 to 2025 | Top Players – Osaka Gas Co., Ltd., Cabot Corporation, Kuraray Co., Calgon Carbon, Haycarb, Kureha Corporation, Donau Carbon GMBH. Retrieved from https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/global-activated-carbon-market-size-and-forecast-to-2025/
Viswanathan, B., Neel, P., & Varadarajan, T. (2009). Methods of activation and specific applications of carbon materials. National Centre for Catalysis Research, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras.
Weber, K., & Quicker, P. (2018). Properties of biochar. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.054
Wongsiriamnuay, T., & Tippayawong, N. (2010). Non-isothermal pyrolysis characteristics of giant sensitive plants using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.037
Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., & Zheng, C. (2007). Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013
Yin, C. Y., Aroua, M. K., & Daud, W. M. A. W. (2007). Review of modifications of activated carbon for enhancing contaminant uptakes from aqueous solutions. Separation and Purification Technology, 52(3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2006.06.009
Yokoyama, T., Kadla, J. F., & Chang, H. M. (2002). Microanalytical method for the characterization of fiber components and morphology of woody plants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011173q
79
Zhang, X., Yang, W., & Blasiak, W. (2013). Kinetics study on thermal dissociation of levoglucosan during cellulose pyrolysis. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.03.035
80
81
Original publications
I Bergna D., Romar H., Tuomikoski S., Runtti H., Kangas T., Tynjälä P., & Lassi, U. (2017). Activated carbon from renewable sources: thermochemical conversion and activation of biomass and carbon residues from biomass gasification. In L. Singh, V. C. Kalia (Eds.), Waste Biomass Management – A Holistic Approach (pp 187-213) Springer.
II Bergna D., Varila T., Romar H., & Lassi, U. (2018). Comparison of the properties of activated carbons produced in one-stage and two-stage processes. C Journal of Carbon Research 4(3): 41.
III Bergna D., Romar H., & Lassi, U. (2018). Physical activation of wooden chips and the effect of particle size, initial humidity, and acetic acid extraction on the properties of activated carbons. C Journal of Carbon Research 4(4): 66.
IV Bergna D., Hu T., Prokkola H., Romar H., & Lassi, U. (2019). Effect of some process parameters on the main properties of activated carbon produced from peat in a lab-scale process. Waste and Biomass Valorization.
V Varila T., Bergna D., Lahti R., Romar H., Hu T., & Lassi, U. (2017). Activated carbon production from peat using ZnCl2: characterization and applications. BioResources 12(4): 8078-8092.
VI Lahti R., Bergna D., Romar H., Tuuttila T., Hu T., & Lassi, U. (2017). Physico-chemical properties and use of waste biomass-derived activated carbons. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 57: 43-48.
Reprinted with permission from Springer (Paper I), AIDIC/CET (Paper VI) and
under Creative Commons CC BY license (Papers II-V).
Original publications are not included in the electronic version of the dissertation.
82
A C T A U N I V E R S I T A T I S O U L U E N S I S
Book orders:Virtual book store
http://verkkokauppa.juvenesprint.fi
S E R I E S C T E C H N I C A
707. Visuri, Aku (2019) Wear-IT : implications of mobile & wearable technologies tohuman attention and interruptibility
708. Shahabuddin, Shahriar (2019) MIMO detection and precoding architectures
709. Lappi, Teemu (2019) Digitalizing Finland : governance of government ICT projects
710. Pitkänen, Olli (2019) On-device synthesis of customized carbon nanotubestructures
711. Vielma, Tuomas (2019) Thermodynamic properties of concentrated zinc bearingsolutions
712. Ramasetti, Eshwar Kumar (2019) Modelling of open-eye formation and mixingphenomena in a gas-stirred ladle for different operating parameters
713. Javaheri, Vahid (2019) Design, thermomechanical processing and inductionhardening of a new medium-carbon steel microalloyed with niobium
714. Hautala, Ilkka (2019) From dataflow models to energy efficient application specificprocessors
715. Ruokamo, Simo (2019) Single shared model approach for building informationmodelling
716. Isohookana, Matti (2019) Taistelunkestävä hajaspektritietovuo kansalliseensotilasilmailuun
717. Joseph, Nina (2019) CuMoO4: A microwave dielectric and thermochromicceramic with ultra-low fabrication temperature
718. Kühnlenz, Florian (2019) Analyzing flexible demand in smart grids
719. Sun, Jia (2019) Speeding up the settling of switched-capacitor amplifier blocks inanalog-to-digital converters
720. Lähetkangas, Kalle (2019) Special applications and spectrum sharing with LSA
721. Kiventerä, Jenni (2019) Stabilization of sulphidic mine tailings by differenttreatment methods : Heavy metals and sulphate immobilization
722. Fylakis, Angelos (2019) Data hiding algorithms for healthcare applications
723. Juuso, Ilkka (2019) A Cellular automaton environment for the complex system ofspeech
724. Aho, Pekka (2019) Automated state model extraction, testing and changedetection through Graphical User Interface
C725etukansi.fm Page 2 Tuesday, October 15, 2019 8:46 AM
UNIVERSITY OF OULU P .O. Box 8000 F I -90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND
A C T A U N I V E R S I T A T I S O U L U E N S I S
University Lecturer Tuomo Glumoff
University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen
Senior research fellow Jari Juuti
Professor Olli Vuolteenaho
University Lecturer Veli-Matti Ulvinen
Planning Director Pertti Tikkanen
Professor Jari Juga
University Lecturer Anu Soikkeli
Professor Olli Vuolteenaho
Publications Editor Kirsti Nurkkala
ISBN 978-952-62-2411-4 (Paperback)ISBN 978-952-62-2412-1 (PDF)ISSN 0355-3213 (Print)ISSN 1796-2226 (Online)
U N I V E R S I TAT I S O U L U E N S I SACTAC
TECHNICA
U N I V E R S I TAT I S O U L U E N S I SACTAC
TECHNICA
OULU 2019
C 725
Davide Bergna
ACTIVATED CARBON FROM RENEWABLE RESOURCESCARBONIZATION, ACTIVATION AND USE
UNIVERSITY OF OULU GRADUATE SCHOOL;UNIVERSITY OF OULU,FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY;KOKKOLA UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM CHYDENIUS
C 725
AC
TAD
avide Bergna
C725etukansi.fm Page 1 Tuesday, October 15, 2019 8:46 AM