Download - Bid Evaluation Guideline
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
1/11
Format for Sample
Bid Evaluation Report
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
2/11
Format for Sample Bid Evaluation Report
1.0 INTR!U"TIN#
1.1 Background
Brief description of the Project
Packaging of works into Contracts
Engineers Estimate
Approval of PC for the bidding document Invitation &
P!
1.2 Composition of Procurement Committee
1.3 Composition of Technical Evaluation Committee
2.0 "$$E"TIN F INFR%ATIN AN! &RE$I%INARYE'A%INATIN F BI!S (STA)E I*#
2.1 Invitation of Bids
Approved method "ICB#$CB#I%B#$%B'(
$ames of $ational $ews Papers and other media used
$on refundable fee of the Bidding )ocument *ist issue date
%atest updated+ if an,
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
3/11
2.# Preliminar$ E%amination of Bids
1erification
.missions2 Bid 1alidit,2 Completeness of Bid *orm2 Acceptable 3oint
1enture Agreement+ if applicable2 %etter of Authori4ation# Power ofAttorne,2 if the bidder is an agent+ an authori4ation from the supplier or
manufacturer
Eligibilit,
he bidder "including all members of a 3#1 and sub-contractors( ma, be
dis5ualified if affiliated with a firm that has provided related consultanc,
services on the project or in case of A)B#6B funded projects+ if thebidder is a publicl, owned enterprise from the borrowers countr,+ lacking
legal and financial autonom,
E/ample7- a( he bidder shall not be blacklisted2
b( In case of 6orks Contracts+ the domestic biddershould have re5uired ICA) registration2
c( *or foreign funded projects+ if so specified b, the*unding Agenc,+ "i( in case of works contracts+ the
bidder shall be from one of the member countries
of the *unding Agenc,+ and "ii( in case of goods+the goods shall be manufactured in one of the member
countries of the funding agenc,
Bid !ecurit,
*rom an acceptable suret, in the re5uired format for the specified amount
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
4/11
+.0 !ETER%INATIN F SUBSTANTIA$ RES&NSI,ENESS F BI!S
(STA)E-2*#
3.1 &inor Deviations
A ;inor )eviation would be one which either+
a( 9as no effect on the validit, of the bid2 or
b( 9as no effect in substantial wa, to the scope+ 5ualit,+ functionall, or
performance2 orc( 9as no effect on price+ 5ualit, or deliver, of the goods or service offered2 or
d( 6ill not limit an, substantial wa, the Emplo,ers right or biddersobligations2 or
e( 9as such effect but the difference from the commercial terms or technicalspecifications in the bidding documents is such that it can be given a monetar,
value2 or
f( 9as not been specified in the bidding documents as grounds for rejection ofthe bid+ provided that the total amount of adjustments for such deviations does
not e/ceed a previousl, determined percentage of the price
3.2 &a'or Deviations
A bid considered substantiall, responsive if it does not contain an,
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
5/11
"iii(Phasing of contract start-up+ deliver,+ installation+ or construction
not conforming to re5uired critical dates or progress markers
"iv( !ub-contracting in a substantiall, different amount or mannerthan that permitted
"v( ?efusing to bear important responsibilities and liabilities allocated
in the bidding documents+ such as performance guarantees andinsurance coverage
"vi( aking e/ception to critical provisions such as applicable law+
ta/es and duties+ and dispute resolution procedures"vii(hose deviations that are specified in the IB as re5uiring
rejection of the bid "such as+ in the case of works+ participatingin the submission of an anothers bid other than as a sub-
contractor(
3.3 De!ata!le Deviations
3.# (ames of !idders) re'ected and reasons for re'ection
In the absence of clearl, defined distinction between ;ajor and ;inor
deviations+ there is a room for different interpretation
Bids that offer deviations ma, be considered substantiall, responsive-at
least as to the issue of fairness- if the deviations can be assigned a
monetar, value that would be added as a penalt, during the detailedevaluation process and if such deviations would be acceptable in the
eventual contract
he results of preliminar, e/amination should be presented in a ableanne/ed to the report
$ames of bidders rejected and reasons for rejection should be presented in
a able
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
6/11
herefore+ detailed evaluation should include all substantiall, responsive
bids which have a reasonable chance of becoming the lowest evaluated bid
Correction for errors
he methodolog, for correction of computational errors as described
in the IB' he readout prices and their corrections should be
presented in a table' he corrections are binding upon the bidder'8nusual or large corrections that could affect the comparative
ranking of bids should be e/plained in footnotes .
Corrections for Provisional !ums
Bids ma, contain provisional sums set out b, the Emplo,er for
nominated sub-contractors or for contingencies etc' As these sumsare the same for all bids+ the, should be subtracted from read-out
prices+ to allow for a proper comparison of bids in subse5uent steps
;odifications and discounts
In accordance with the IB+ bidders are allowed to submit+ prior to
bid opening+ modifications to their original bid' he impact of
modifications should be full, reflected in the e/amination and
evaluation of the bids
Additions
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
7/11
#.2 Technical Evaluation
%ist and tabulate an, deviations from the scope of suppl,+ deliver, or work
schedule+ the important technical specifications of all major items of e5uipment
and material "e'g7 plant rating+ capacit,+ speed+ voltage and pressure+ operatingtemperature+ etc'(+ their performance characteristics "e'g7 plant efficienc,+ fuel
consumption+ losses+ etc'(+ and warrant, period as set out in the technical
re5uirements'
As in the detailed evaluation of commercial terms+ an, substantial deviations fromthe technical re5uirements of the bidding documents should be listed and it should
be determined whether a financial adjustment to the bid is necessar, or the bidshould be rejected as non responsive
#.3 *inancial Evaluation
*inancial adjustments to the acceptable deviations identified under the
Commercial Evaluation and echnical Evaluation are made according to theprovisions in the IB'
i' he bid prices should be adjusted for the purpose of bidcomparisons for those deviations which are permissible and which can be
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
8/11
necessar, to consider the bid as a whole is non-responsive'
In other instances+ adjustments for onl, one or a few deviations have a
relativel, high monetar, value+ as would be the case with deviationsregarding retention mone, or li5uidated damages' It is+ therefore+ useful
to adopt a percentage of the bid price as the ma/imum amount of
adjustments which can be made without considering the bid non-responsive' *ifteen percent of the bid price is considered an appropriate
limit for the total monetar, value of all adjustments to the bid price2 if the
total e/ceeds fifteen percent of the bid price+ the bid ma, be rejected asnon-responsive
)omestic Preference
)omestic Preference+ if applicable+ shall be used in this stage of
evaluation' Applicable margin of preference as given in the Duidelinesshall be used
?ecord of clarifications made from all bidders
E/tension of Bid 1alidit, Period
If it was necessar, to get the Bid 1alidit, period e/tended+ due tounavoidable circumstances+ to complete the bid evaluation and award the
contract+ bids of those who refused to e/tend the validit, as re5uired shall
be rejected
/.0 !ETER%INATIN F TE $EST E,A$UATE! SUBSTANTIA$$Y
RES&NSI,E BI! AN! &ST-UA$IFI"ATIN ASSESS%ENT
(STA)E-*#
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
9/11
+.3 Post ualification ssessment
-Capabilit,-Capacit,
-E/perience
-Performance
As a final step prior recommendation for an award+ the EC should
alwa,s make a post-5ualification assessment of the lowest evaluatedsubstantiall, responsive bidder to ensure that the bidder has the
e/perience+ technical capabilit,+ capacit, "both technical and financialresources( to e/ecute the contract satisfactoril,' If the lowest evaluatedbidder fails post-5ualification+ its bid should be rejected+ and the ne/t
ranked bidder should then be subject to post-5ualification e/amination' If
successful+ this bidder is recommended for an award
A distinction should be made between the 5ualification of the bidder and
those of the manufacturer+ if the bid is submitted b, a part, other than the
manufacturer+ such as importer+ a trader+ an agent who will act as asupplier and sign the contract'
A statement b, the manufacturer certif,ing that the bidder is authori4ed to
offer goods manufactured b, him and that the manufacturer will assume
all warrant, obligations.
he minimum 5ualification re5uirements are specified in the Invitation toBid and the bidding documents.
he information and documentations re5uired to be submitted b, bidders are also
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
10/11
c( *or works contracts+ performance data ma, include7- Information on similar works undertaken in the last three
,ears2
6hether the bidder has necessar, e5uipment or access to
the e5uipment needed for the works contract2
6hether he has the personnel and manpower to undertake
the works
3.0 RE"%%EN!ATIN#
Based on the above detailed evaluation+ acceptable lowest evaluated substantiall,
responsive bid is recommended for award'
*ull name and registered address
amount of award e/cluding 1A should be given
TABU$ATIN F !ATA
he following details and information shall be tabulated and attached to the Evaluation?eport in the form of Anne/ or Appendi/ as appropriate'
0' )eclaration of the ;embers of EC as per $PA ;anual:' ?ecord of Bid .pening
>' )etails of Bid !ecurities submitted
@ *or all bidders details of eligibilit,
-
7/25/2019 Bid Evaluation Guideline
11/11
.PE?AI.$A% & CAPIA% C.! A$A%!I! .* 9ID9 %I* P8;PI$D !E!
!ES"RI&TIN "ompan4 No.1 "ompan4 No.2 "ompan4 No.+ "ompan4 No. "ompan4 No./ "ompan4 No.3
Capacit, "m>
#hr(Capacit, "l#s(
9ead "m(
6ater Power "Jw(
Pump Efficienc, "K(
;otor Efficienc, "K(
.verall efficienc, "K(
Pump power re5uired "Jw(
;otor power re5uired "Jw(
Annual operational hours
Elect7 Energ, #ear "k6h(
8nit cost of elect7 energ, "?s'#k6h(Cost of annual elect7 energ, "?s'(
Economic life of pumping sets "ear(
)iscounting rate#0HH
Present value of total elect7 energ, cost "?s'(
Capital cost of pumping sets "?s'(
Capital cost L P1 of .perational cost "?s'(
?ank
0H