Imagine the result
Ohio Department of Transportation
District 11
BEL-149-23.79
PID 99042
Interchange Operations Study
April 30, 2015 (Revised June 4, 2015)
BEL-149-23.79 IOS BEL-149-23.79 Prepared for:
Ohio Department of Transportation District 11
Prepared by:
ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 222 South Main Street Suite 300 Akron Ohio 44308 Tel 330 434 1995 Fax 330 374 1095
Our Ref.:
TOHODT04.PE07
Date:
6/4/15
Kevin Kehres, PE Project Manager
Daniel Jozity, PE, PTOE Transportation Project Engineer
This document is intended only for the use of the individual or entity for which it was prepared and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this document is strictly prohibited.
bel-149-2379 ios.docx i
Table of Contents
1. Project Summary 1
2. Study Area 1
2.1 HCS Analysis Points 2
2.1.1 Freeway Analysis 2
2.1.2 Ramp Analysis 2
2.1.3 Intersection Analysis 2
3. Existing Conditions 2
4. Problem Description 2
5. Traffic Analysis 4
5.1 Freeway Analysis 4
5.2 Ramp Analysis 4
5.3 Intersection Analysis 5
5.4 No Build Intersection 6
5.5 Build Intersection 7
6. Conclusion 7
Tables
Table 1 Freeway Analysis 4
Table 2 Ramp Analysis 4
Table 3 Intersection Analysis 5
Figures
Figure 1 Study Map with Analysis Points 1
Figure 2 IR 70 Westbound Exit Queue 3
Figure 3 IR 70 Westbound Exit Ramp No Build Condition 6
Figure 4 SR 149 looking north towards Bond Drive 6
Figure 5 IR 70 Westbound Exit Ramp Build Condition 7
bel-149-2379 ios.docx ii
Table of Contents
Appendices
A Certified Traffic
B Freeway Analysis – No Build
C Freeway Analysis – Build
D Ramp Analysis – No Build
E Ramp Analysis – Build
F Intersection Analysis – No Build
G Intersection Analysis - Build
bel-149-2379 ios.docx 1
Interchange Operations Study BEL-149-23.79
1. Project Summary
2. Study Area
The project area is located in Belmont County, at the interchange of IR 70 and SR 149 (Belmont Morristown Road). IR 70 is an east-west freeway, while SR 149 runs north and south.
Location SR 149 and IR 70 Interchange, Union Township, Belmont County
PID 99042
Study Sponsor ODOT, District 11
Proposed Work Widening the I-70 westbound exit ramp at SR 149 to accommodate a right turn lane and installing a traffic signal at the intersection.
Figure 1 Study Map with Analysis Points
Freeway Analysis Points Ramp Analysis Points
bel-149-2379 ios.docx 2
Interchange Operations Study BEL-149-23.79
2.1 HCS Analysis Points
2.1.1 Freeway Analysis
• Westbound I-70 upstream of SR 149 Diverge • Westbound I-70 downstream of SR 149 Merge
2.1.2 Ramp Analysis
• Westbound I-70 Diverge to SR 149 • Westbound I-70 Merge from SR 149
2.1.3 Intersection Analysis
• Westbound I-70 Ramp at SR 149 • Eastbound I-70 Ramp at SR 149 • Bond Drive at SR 149
3. Existing Conditions
The interchange is a standard diamond configuration, with SR 149 running north and south, and IR 70 east and west. The IR 70 westbound and eastbound exit ramps are stop controlled.
To the east and west of the interchange, IR 70 is a divided highway with two lanes in each direction. All of the ramps at the interchange are single lane. IR 70 and the ramps are constructed of concrete pavement.
SR 149 is a two-lane asphalt concrete roadway, with the exception of turn lanes at the Bond Drive intersection immediately north of the study interchange.
4. Problem Description
This study follows the “BEL-70-9.63 Safety Study” which evaluated the existing safety performance and identified potential mitigation strategies for reducing crashes and improving operational issues at the IR 70 Westbound Exit Ramp intersection with SR 149. Based on the Safety Study, due to the IR 70 eastbound ramps intersection with SR 149 not meeting signal warrants, experiencing acceptable levels of service and minimal crashes, no improvements were planned at this intersection.
bel-149-2379 ios.docx 3
Interchange Operations Study BEL-149-23.79
Of the total 17 crashes over four years within the study area, 11 were at the IR 70 westbound exit ramp intersection. In addition, four of the six injury crashes were also at this intersection. Of the 11 crashes at this intersection, nine were rear end and two were angle crashes. Rear end crashes are a primary cause of congestion.
Congestion problems at the IR 70 westbound exit ramp exist due to the high volume of trucks (T24 of 16%), the lack of turn lanes and the westbound movement being stop controlled. The increased traffic volumes for the design year will further increase the congestion and potential for crashes.
Two main problems exist, which must be addressed in order improve the efficiency of the intersection. First, due to poor intersection geometrics large trucks are hesitant to complete the northbound left turn movement onto the westbound entrance ramp due to the high volume of vehicles turning right onto SR 149 from the IR 70 westbound exit ramp. The path of the vehicle turning right encroaches into the projected path of the truck making the left hand maneuver. Secondly, with the high left turn demand from the IR 70 westbound exit ramp and the minimal gaps on SR 149, the stop condition provides inefficient operations resulting in long queues and the potential for rear end crashes.
The purpose of this study is to identify modifications to the intersection which will improve the traffic flow and reduce congestion without impacting operations on I-70.
Figure 2 IR 70 Westbound Exit Queue
bel-149-2379 ios.docx 4
Interchange Operations Study BEL-149-23.79
Table 2 Ramp Analysis
5. Traffic Analysis
• Mainline, I-70 – 70 mph • Crossroad, SR 149 – 45 mph • Adjacent Signalized Intersection, Bond Drive – 25 mph
5.1 Freeway Analysis
The freeway analysis was performed at the locations identified in Section 2.1.1 and shown in Figure 1. See Appendix A for certified traffic data, Appendices B and C for the Freeway Analyses of the no-build and build condition respectively.
I-70 Westbound Mainline Analysis
2035 AM No-Build
2035 AM Build
2035 PM No-Build
2035 PM Build
LOS Density
(pc/mi/ln) LOS
Density (pc/mi/ln)
LOS Density
(pc/mi/ln) LOS
Density (pc/mi/ln)
Westbound I-70 East of SR 149 B 16.1 B 16.1 C 18.9 C 18.9
Westbound I-70 West of SR 149 B 15.1 B 15.1 B 17.5 B 17.5
Table 1 Freeway Analysis
5.2 Ramp Analysis
The ramp analysis was performed at the locations identified in Section 2.1.2 and shown in Figure 1. See Appendix A for certified traffic data, Appendices D and E for the Ramp Analyses of the no-build and build condition respectively.
I-70 Westbound Ramp Analysis
2035 AM No-Build
2035 AM Build
2035 PM No-Build
2035 PM Build
LOS Density
(pc/mi/ln) LOS
Density (pc/mi/ln)
LOS Density
(pc/mi/ln) LOS
Density (pc/mi/ln)
SR 149 Diverge B 19.1 B 19.1 C 22.5 C 22.5
SR 149 Merge B 17.1 B 17.1 B 19.7 B 19.7
bel-149-2379 ios.docx 5
Interchange Operations Study BEL-149-23.79
5.3 Intersection Analysis
The intersection analysis was performed at the locations identified in Section 2.1.3 and shown in Figure 1. See Appendix A for certified traffic data, Appendices F and G for the Intersection Analyses of the no-build and build condition respectively.
SR 149 Intersections
2035 AM No-Build
2035 AM Build
2035 PM No-Build
2035 PM Build
LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Delay (sec/veh)
LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Delay (sec/veh)
Bond Drive Signalized (70 sec. Cycle) Signalized (70 sec. Cycle)
WB Approach B 15.3 B 14.6 B 14.8 B 14.1
NB Approach B 12.2 B 12.8 B 13.5 B 14.2
SB Approach B 12.8 B 13.5 B 13.9 B 14.6
EB Approach B 14.4 B 13.8 B 14.4 B 13.8
Overall Intersection
B 13.1 B 13.5 B 13.8 B 14.3
Ramp C (WB Exit)
No-Build - Stop Controlled Build - Signalized (70 sec. Cycle)
No-Build - Stop Controlled Build – Signalized (70 sec. Cycle)
WB Approach E 44.3 B 16.2 F 200.9 B 18.6
NB Approach A 8.6 B 14.7 A 9.1 B 16.8
SB Approach B 14.0 B 14.5
Overall Intersection
B 14.8
B 16.5
Ramp B (EB Exit)
Stop Controlled Stop Controlled
EB Approach D 25.5 D 25.5 E 35.5 E 35.5
SB Approach A 9.8 A 9.8 A 9.6 A 9.6
Table 3 Intersection Analysis
bel-149-2379 ios.docx 6
Interchange Operations Study BEL-149-23.79
5.4 No Build Intersection
Figure 3 IR 70 Westbound Exit Ramp No Build Condition
The existing IR 70 westbound exit ramp is one sixteen foot lane with a six foot outside shoulder and a three foot inside shoulder. The pavement is concrete and the ramp is stop controlled.
SR 149 is one lane in each direction at the intersection. Lanes are approximately twelve feet in width with adequately wide shoulders. The pavement is asphalt concrete. North of the intersection the pavement begins to taper to develop the turn lanes for Bond Drive. Bond Drive is approximately 750 feet to the north of the intersection. Bond Drive is currently signalized.
Figure 4 SR 149 looking north towards Bond Drive
bel-149-2379 ios.docx 7
Interchange Operations Study BEL-149-23.79
5.5 Build Intersection
Figure 5 IR 70 Westbound Exit Ramp Build Condition
The proposed build condition constructs a new 400 foot right turn lane for the westbound exit ramp. Each lane is twelve feet in width with a six foot outside shoulder while maintaining the inside three foot shoulder. The outside lane is protected with guardrail due to the steep slope. The right turn curve radius is improved to allow trucks to make the right turn without encroaching into the southbound lanes. The intersection will be signalized with stop line and dilemma zone detection. The signal at this intersection will be interconnected with Bond Drive to provide progression thru the corridor.
6. Conclusion
The proposed improvements will not degrade the level of service for the 2035 design year and will improve the operations of the intersection over the existing/no-build condition. The improvements to the intersection will also potentially mitigate the crashes that were due to congestion. No adverse effects to IR 70 will take place based on the proposed improvements. It is therefore recommended to move forward in implementing the proposed improvements.
Appendix A
Certified Traffic
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION
TO: Chris Varcolla, District 11 FROM: Bryan Raderstorf, Office of Statewide Planning and Research SUBJECT: BEL-149-23.79, PID 99042 DATE: April 1, 2015 In reply to a request received January 8, 2015, plates are attached showing 2015/2035 ADT, A.M. DHV and P.M. DHV volumes. K&D factors can be calculated from the plates as needed.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (614) 752-5736.
Appendix B
Freeway Analysis – No Build
HCS 2010: Basic Freeway Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________Operational Analysis__________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency or Company: ODOT Date Performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis Time Period: AM DHV Freeway/Direction: Westbound From/To: Route 40 to SR 149 Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Freeway Analysis East of SR 149 _________________________Flow Inputs and Adjustments___________________________ Volume, V 1930 veh/h Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 513 v Trucks and buses 19 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Level Grade - % Segment length - mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1124 pc/h/ln _________________________Speed Inputs and Adjustments__________________________ Lane width - ft Right-side lateral clearance - ft Total ramp density, TRD - ramps/mi Number of lanes, N 2 Free-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 70.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW - mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC - mi/h TRD adjustment - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h _________________________LOS and Performance Measures__________________________ Flow rate, vp 1124 pc/h/ln Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h Average passenger-car speed, S 70.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 2 Density, D 16.1 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS B
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 55 mph.
HCS 2010: Basic Freeway Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________Operational Analysis__________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency or Company: ODOT Date Performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM DHV Freeway/Direction: Westbound From/To: Route 40 to SR 149 Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Freeway Analysis East of SR 149 _________________________Flow Inputs and Adjustments___________________________ Volume, V 2270 veh/h Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 604 v Trucks and buses 19 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Level Grade - % Segment length - mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1322 pc/h/ln _________________________Speed Inputs and Adjustments__________________________ Lane width - ft Right-side lateral clearance - ft Total ramp density, TRD - ramps/mi Number of lanes, N 2 Free-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 70.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW - mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC - mi/h TRD adjustment - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h _________________________LOS and Performance Measures__________________________ Flow rate, vp 1322 pc/h/ln Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h Average passenger-car speed, S 69.8 mi/h Number of lanes, N 2 Density, D 18.9 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS C
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 55 mph.
HCS 2010: Basic Freeway Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________Operational Analysis__________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency or Company: ODOT Date Performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis Time Period: AM DHV Freeway/Direction: Westbound From/To: SR 149 to SR 800 Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Freeway Analysis West of SR 149 _________________________Flow Inputs and Adjustments___________________________ Volume, V 1810 veh/h Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 481 v Trucks and buses 19 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Level Grade - % Segment length - mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1054 pc/h/ln _________________________Speed Inputs and Adjustments__________________________ Lane width - ft Right-side lateral clearance - ft Total ramp density, TRD - ramps/mi Number of lanes, N 2 Free-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 70.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW - mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC - mi/h TRD adjustment - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h _________________________LOS and Performance Measures__________________________ Flow rate, vp 1054 pc/h/ln Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h Average passenger-car speed, S 70.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 2 Density, D 15.1 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS B
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 55 mph.
HCS 2010: Basic Freeway Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________Operational Analysis__________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency or Company: ODOT Date Performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM DHV Freeway/Direction: Westbound From/To: SR 149 to SR 800 Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Freeway Analysis West of SR 149 _________________________Flow Inputs and Adjustments___________________________ Volume, V 2100 veh/h Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 559 v Trucks and buses 19 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Level Grade - % Segment length - mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1223 pc/h/ln _________________________Speed Inputs and Adjustments__________________________ Lane width - ft Right-side lateral clearance - ft Total ramp density, TRD - ramps/mi Number of lanes, N 2 Free-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 70.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW - mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC - mi/h TRD adjustment - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h _________________________LOS and Performance Measures__________________________ Flow rate, vp 1223 pc/h/ln Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h Average passenger-car speed, S 70.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 2 Density, D 17.5 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS B
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 55 mph.
Appendix C
Freeway Analysis – Build
HCS 2010: Basic Freeway Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________Operational Analysis__________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency or Company: ODOT Date Performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis Time Period: AM DHV Freeway/Direction: Westbound From/To: Route 40 to SR 149 Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Freeway Analysis East of SR 149 _________________________Flow Inputs and Adjustments___________________________ Volume, V 1930 veh/h Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 513 v Trucks and buses 19 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Level Grade - % Segment length - mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1124 pc/h/ln _________________________Speed Inputs and Adjustments__________________________ Lane width - ft Right-side lateral clearance - ft Total ramp density, TRD - ramps/mi Number of lanes, N 2 Free-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 70.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW - mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC - mi/h TRD adjustment - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h _________________________LOS and Performance Measures__________________________ Flow rate, vp 1124 pc/h/ln Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h Average passenger-car speed, S 70.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 2 Density, D 16.1 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS B
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 55 mph.
HCS 2010: Basic Freeway Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________Operational Analysis__________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency or Company: ODOT Date Performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM DHV Freeway/Direction: Westbound From/To: Route 40 to SR 149 Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Freeway Analysis East of SR 149 _________________________Flow Inputs and Adjustments___________________________ Volume, V 2270 veh/h Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 604 v Trucks and buses 19 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Level Grade - % Segment length - mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1322 pc/h/ln _________________________Speed Inputs and Adjustments__________________________ Lane width - ft Right-side lateral clearance - ft Total ramp density, TRD - ramps/mi Number of lanes, N 2 Free-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 70.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW - mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC - mi/h TRD adjustment - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h _________________________LOS and Performance Measures__________________________ Flow rate, vp 1322 pc/h/ln Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h Average passenger-car speed, S 69.8 mi/h Number of lanes, N 2 Density, D 18.9 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS C
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 55 mph.
HCS 2010: Basic Freeway Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________Operational Analysis__________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency or Company: ODOT Date Performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis Time Period: AM DHV Freeway/Direction: Westbound From/To: SR 149 to SR 800 Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Freeway Analysis West of SR 149 _________________________Flow Inputs and Adjustments___________________________ Volume, V 1810 veh/h Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 481 v Trucks and buses 19 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Level Grade - % Segment length - mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1054 pc/h/ln _________________________Speed Inputs and Adjustments__________________________ Lane width - ft Right-side lateral clearance - ft Total ramp density, TRD - ramps/mi Number of lanes, N 2 Free-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 70.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW - mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC - mi/h TRD adjustment - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h _________________________LOS and Performance Measures__________________________ Flow rate, vp 1054 pc/h/ln Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h Average passenger-car speed, S 70.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 2 Density, D 15.1 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS B
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 55 mph.
HCS 2010: Basic Freeway Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________Operational Analysis__________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency or Company: ODOT Date Performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM DHV Freeway/Direction: Westbound From/To: SR 149 to SR 800 Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Freeway Analysis West of SR 149 _________________________Flow Inputs and Adjustments___________________________ Volume, V 2100 veh/h Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 559 v Trucks and buses 19 % Recreational vehicles 0 % Terrain type: Level Grade - % Segment length - mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 Driver population factor, fp 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1223 pc/h/ln _________________________Speed Inputs and Adjustments__________________________ Lane width - ft Right-side lateral clearance - ft Total ramp density, TRD - ramps/mi Number of lanes, N 2 Free-flow speed: Measured FFS or BFFS 70.0 mi/h Lane width adjustment, fLW - mi/h Lateral clearance adjustment, fLC - mi/h TRD adjustment - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h _________________________LOS and Performance Measures__________________________ Flow rate, vp 1223 pc/h/ln Free-flow speed, FFS 70.0 mi/h Average passenger-car speed, S 70.0 mi/h Number of lanes, N 2 Density, D 17.5 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS B
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 55 mph.
Appendix D
Ramp Analysis – No Build
HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________________Merge Analysis________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency/Co.: ODOT Date performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis time period: AM DHV Freeway/Dir of Travel: Westbound Junction: Westbound Entrance Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Westbound Entrance Ramp from SR 149 Design Year __________________________________Freeway Data_________________________________ Type of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 2 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 1640 vph __________________________________On Ramp Data_________________________________ Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free-flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 170 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 750 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft _________________________Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists)____________________ Does adjacent ramp exist? No Volume on adjacent Ramp vph Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions___________________ Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 1640 170 vph Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 436 45 v Trucks and buses 19 14 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Level Level Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 0.935 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1910 194 pcph _________________________Estimation of V12 Merge Areas_________________________ L = (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 0 FM v = v (P ) = 1910 pc/h 12 F FM _______________________________Capacity Checks_________________________________ Actual Maximum LOS F? v 2104 4800 No FO v or v 0 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 1910 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ________________________Flow Entering Merge Influence Area_____________________ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2104 4600 No R12 _________________Level of Service Determination (if not F)_____________________ Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 17.1 pc/mi/ln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp-freeway junction areas of influence B _____________________________Speed Estimation__________________________________ Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.300 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 61.6 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = N/A mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.6 mph _______________________________________________________________________________
HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________________Merge Analysis________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency/Co.: ODOT Date performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis time period: PM DHV Freeway/Dir of Travel: Westbound Junction: Westbound Entrance Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Westbound Entrance Ramp from SR 149 Design Year __________________________________Freeway Data_________________________________ Type of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 2 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 1880 vph __________________________________On Ramp Data_________________________________ Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free-flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 220 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 750 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft _________________________Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists)____________________ Does adjacent ramp exist? No Volume on adjacent Ramp vph Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions___________________ Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 1880 220 vph Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 500 59 v Trucks and buses 19 14 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Level Level Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 0.935 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2190 250 pcph _________________________Estimation of V12 Merge Areas_________________________ L = (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 0 FM v = v (P ) = 2190 pc/h 12 F FM _______________________________Capacity Checks_________________________________ Actual Maximum LOS F? v 2440 4800 No FO v or v 0 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2190 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ________________________Flow Entering Merge Influence Area_____________________ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2440 4600 No R12 _________________Level of Service Determination (if not F)_____________________ Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 19.7 pc/mi/ln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp-freeway junction areas of influence B _____________________________Speed Estimation__________________________________ Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.313 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 61.2 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = N/A mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.2 mph _______________________________________________________________________________
HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________________Diverge Analysis______________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency/Co.: ODOT Date performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis time period: AM DHV Freeway/Dir of Travel: Westbound Junction: Westbound Exit Ramp Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Westbound Exit Ramp to SR 149 Design Year __________________________________Freeway Data_________________________________ Type of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 2 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 1930 vph _________________________________Off Ramp Data_________________________________ Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free-Flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 290 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 500 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft _________________________Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists)____________________ Does adjacent ramp exist? No Volume on adjacent ramp vph Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions___________________ Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 1930 290 vph Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 513 77 v Trucks and buses 19 16 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 0.926 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2248 333 pcph _________________________Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas_______________________ L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 0 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2248 pc/h 12 R F R FD _______________________________Capacity Checks_________________________________ Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 2248 4800 No Fi F v = v - v 1915 4800 No FO F R v 333 2000 No R v or v 0 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2248 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ______________________Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area_____________________ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2248 4400 No 12 _________________Level of Service Determination (if not F)_____________________ Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 19.1 pc/mi/ln R 12 D Level of service for ramp-freeway junction areas of influence B _____________________________Speed Estimation__________________________________ Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.458 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.2 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = N/A mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.2 mph _______________________________________________________________________________
HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________________Diverge Analysis______________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency/Co.: ODOT Date performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis time period: PM DHV Freeway/Dir of Travel: Westbound Junction: Westbound Exit Ramp Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Westbound Exit Ramp to SR 149 Design Year __________________________________Freeway Data_________________________________ Type of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 2 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 2270 vph _________________________________Off Ramp Data_________________________________ Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free-Flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 410 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 500 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft _________________________Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists)____________________ Does adjacent ramp exist? No Volume on adjacent ramp vph Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions___________________ Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 2270 410 vph Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 604 109 v Trucks and buses 19 16 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 0.926 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2644 471 pcph _________________________Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas_______________________ L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 0 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2644 pc/h 12 R F R FD _______________________________Capacity Checks_________________________________ Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 2644 4800 No Fi F v = v - v 2173 4800 No FO F R v 471 2000 No R v or v 0 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2644 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ______________________Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area_____________________ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2644 4400 No 12 _________________Level of Service Determination (if not F)_____________________ Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 22.5 pc/mi/ln R 12 D Level of service for ramp-freeway junction areas of influence C _____________________________Speed Estimation__________________________________ Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.470 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = N/A mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 56.8 mph _______________________________________________________________________________
Appendix E
Ramp Analysis – Build
HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________________Merge Analysis________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency/Co.: ODOT Date performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis time period: AM DHV Freeway/Dir of Travel: Westbound Junction: Westbound Entrance Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Westbound Entrance Ramp from SR 149 Design Year __________________________________Freeway Data_________________________________ Type of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 2 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 1640 vph __________________________________On Ramp Data_________________________________ Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free-flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 170 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 750 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft _________________________Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists)____________________ Does adjacent ramp exist? No Volume on adjacent Ramp vph Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions___________________ Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 1640 170 vph Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 436 45 v Trucks and buses 19 14 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Level Level Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 0.935 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 1910 194 pcph _________________________Estimation of V12 Merge Areas_________________________ L = (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 0 FM v = v (P ) = 1910 pc/h 12 F FM _______________________________Capacity Checks_________________________________ Actual Maximum LOS F? v 2104 4800 No FO v or v 0 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 1910 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ________________________Flow Entering Merge Influence Area_____________________ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2104 4600 No R12 _________________Level of Service Determination (if not F)_____________________ Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 17.1 pc/mi/ln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp-freeway junction areas of influence B _____________________________Speed Estimation__________________________________ Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.300 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 61.6 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = N/A mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.6 mph _______________________________________________________________________________
HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________________Merge Analysis________________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency/Co.: ODOT Date performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis time period: PM DHV Freeway/Dir of Travel: Westbound Junction: Westbound Entrance Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Westbound Entrance Ramp from SR 149 Design Year __________________________________Freeway Data_________________________________ Type of analysis Merge Number of lanes in freeway 2 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 1880 vph __________________________________On Ramp Data_________________________________ Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free-flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 220 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 750 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft _________________________Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists)____________________ Does adjacent ramp exist? No Volume on adjacent Ramp vph Position of adjacent Ramp Type of adjacent Ramp Distance to adjacent Ramp ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions___________________ Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 1880 220 vph Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 500 59 v Trucks and buses 19 14 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Level Level Grade % % % Length mi mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 0.935 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2190 250 pcph _________________________Estimation of V12 Merge Areas_________________________ L = (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 0 FM v = v (P ) = 2190 pc/h 12 F FM _______________________________Capacity Checks_________________________________ Actual Maximum LOS F? v 2440 4800 No FO v or v 0 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2190 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ________________________Flow Entering Merge Influence Area_____________________ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2440 4600 No R12 _________________Level of Service Determination (if not F)_____________________ Density, D = 5.475 + 0.00734 v + 0.0078 v - 0.00627 L = 19.7 pc/mi/ln R R 12 A Level of service for ramp-freeway junction areas of influence B _____________________________Speed Estimation__________________________________ Intermediate speed variable, M = 0.313 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 61.2 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = N/A mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 61.2 mph _______________________________________________________________________________
HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________________Diverge Analysis______________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency/Co.: ODOT Date performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis time period: AM DHV Freeway/Dir of Travel: Westbound Junction: Westbound Exit Ramp Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Westbound Exit Ramp to SR 149 Design Year __________________________________Freeway Data_________________________________ Type of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 2 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 1930 vph _________________________________Off Ramp Data_________________________________ Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free-Flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 290 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 500 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft _________________________Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists)____________________ Does adjacent ramp exist? No Volume on adjacent ramp vph Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions___________________ Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 1930 290 vph Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 513 77 v Trucks and buses 19 16 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 0.926 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2248 333 pcph _________________________Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas_______________________ L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 0 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2248 pc/h 12 R F R FD _______________________________Capacity Checks_________________________________ Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 2248 4800 No Fi F v = v - v 1915 4800 No FO F R v 333 2000 No R v or v 0 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2248 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ______________________Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area_____________________ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2248 4400 No 12 _________________Level of Service Determination (if not F)_____________________ Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 19.1 pc/mi/ln R 12 D Level of service for ramp-freeway junction areas of influence B _____________________________Speed Estimation__________________________________ Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.458 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 57.2 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = N/A mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 57.2 mph _______________________________________________________________________________
HCS 2010: Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments Release 6.1 Phone: Fax: E-mail: _________________________________Diverge Analysis______________________________ Analyst: ARCADIS Agency/Co.: ODOT Date performed: 6/1/2015 Analysis time period: PM DHV Freeway/Dir of Travel: Westbound Junction: Westbound Exit Ramp Jurisdiction: ODOT Analysis Year: 2035 Description: Westbound Exit Ramp to SR 149 Design Year __________________________________Freeway Data_________________________________ Type of analysis Diverge Number of lanes in freeway 2 Free-flow speed on freeway 70.0 mph Volume on freeway 2270 vph _________________________________Off Ramp Data_________________________________ Side of freeway Right Number of lanes in ramp 1 Free-Flow speed on ramp 35.0 mph Volume on ramp 410 vph Length of first accel/decel lane 500 ft Length of second accel/decel lane ft _________________________Adjacent Ramp Data (if one exists)____________________ Does adjacent ramp exist? No Volume on adjacent ramp vph Position of adjacent ramp Type of adjacent ramp Distance to adjacent ramp ft ____________________Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions___________________ Junction Components Freeway Ramp Adjacent Ramp Volume, V (vph) 2270 410 vph Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Peak 15-min volume, v15 604 109 v Trucks and buses 19 16 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 % Terrain type: Level Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % % Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi mi Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV 0.913 0.926 Driver population factor, fP 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, vp 2644 471 pcph _________________________Estimation of V12 Diverge Areas_______________________ L = (Equation 13-12 or 13-13) EQ P = 1.000 Using Equation 0 FD v = v + (v - v ) P = 2644 pc/h 12 R F R FD _______________________________Capacity Checks_________________________________ Actual Maximum LOS F? v = v 2644 4800 No Fi F v = v - v 2173 4800 No FO F R v 471 2000 No R v or v 0 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) 3 av34 Is v or v > 2700 pc/h? No 3 av34 Is v or v > 1.5 v /2 No 3 av34 12 If yes, v = 2644 (Equation 13-15, 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) 12A ______________________Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area_____________________ Actual Max Desirable Violation? v 2644 4400 No 12 _________________Level of Service Determination (if not F)_____________________ Density, D = 4.252 + 0.0086 v - 0.009 L = 22.5 pc/mi/ln R 12 D Level of service for ramp-freeway junction areas of influence C _____________________________Speed Estimation__________________________________ Intermediate speed variable, D = 0.470 S Space mean speed in ramp influence area, S = 56.8 mph R Space mean speed in outer lanes, S = N/A mph 0 Space mean speed for all vehicles, S = 56.8 mph _______________________________________________________________________________
Appendix F
Intersection Analysis – No Build
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARYGeneral Information Site Information
Analyst ARCADIS Agency/Co. ODOT Date Performed 4/28/2015 Analysis Time Period AM DHV
Intersection SR 149 and I-70 EB Exit Ramp
Jurisdiction ODOT Analysis Year 2035
Project Description BEL-149-23.79 East/West Street: I-70 EB Exit Ramp North/South Street: SR 149 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsMajor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 320 280 140 310 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 347 304 152 336 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 11 -- --Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 50 0 100 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 54 0 108 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 22 0 22 16 0 16 Percent Grade (%) 0 1 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ServiceApproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12Lane Configuration LT LTR v (veh/h) 152 162 C (m) (veh/h) 894 334 v/c 0.17 0.49 95% queue length 0.61 2.53 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.8 25.5 LOS A D Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 25.5 Approach LOS -- -- D
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/1/2015 3:26 PM
Page 1 of 1Two-Way Stop Control
6/1/2015file:///C:/Users/djozity/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k8EFF.tmp
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARYGeneral Information Site Information
Analyst ARCADIS Agency/Co. ODOT Date Performed 4/28/2015 Analysis Time Period PM DHV
Intersection SR 149 and I-70 EB Exit Ramp
Jurisdiction ODOT Analysis Year 2035
Project Description BEL-149-23.79 East/West Street: I-70 EB Exit Ramp North/South Street: SR 149 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsMajor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 280 270 150 460 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 304 293 163 499 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 11 -- --Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 50 0 80 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 54 0 86 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 22 0 22 16 0 16 Percent Grade (%) 0 1 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ServiceApproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12Lane Configuration LT LTR v (veh/h) 163 140 C (m) (veh/h) 937 253 v/c 0.17 0.55 95% queue length 0.63 3.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 35.5 LOS A E Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 35.5 Approach LOS -- -- E
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/1/2015 3:27 PM
Page 1 of 1Two-Way Stop Control
6/1/2015file:///C:/Users/djozity/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k4FFD.tmp
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARYGeneral Information Site Information
Analyst ARCADIS Agency/Co. ODOT Date Performed 4/28/2015 Analysis Time Period AM DHV
Intersection SR 149 and I-70 WB Exit Ramp
Jurisdiction ODOT Analysis Year 2035
Project Description BEL-149-23.79 East/West Street: I-70 WB Exit Ramp North/South Street: SR 149 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsMajor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 80 290 300 90 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 86 315 0 0 326 97
Percent Heavy Vehicles 9 -- -- 0 -- --Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 150 0 140 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 163 0 152
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 13 0 13 Percent Grade (%) 0 1 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ServiceApproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12Lane Configuration LT LTR v (veh/h) 86 315 C (m) (veh/h) 1100 387 v/c 0.08 0.81 95% queue length 0.25 7.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 44.3 LOS A E Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 44.3 Approach LOS -- -- E
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/2/2015 9:16 AM
Page 1 of 1Two-Way Stop Control
6/2/2015file:///C:/Users/djozity/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k5FB.tmp
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARYGeneral Information Site Information
Analyst ARCADIS Agency/Co. ODOT Date Performed 4/28/2015 Analysis Time Period PM DHV
Intersection SR 149 and I-70 WB Exit Ramp
Jurisdiction ODOT Analysis Year 2035
Project Description BEL-149-23.79 East/West Street: I-70 WB Exit Ramp North/South Street: SR 149 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsMajor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 110 220 380 110 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 119 239 0 0 413 119
Percent Heavy Vehicles 9 -- -- 0 -- --Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 230 0 180 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 249 0 195
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 13 0 13 Percent Grade (%) 0 1 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ServiceApproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12Lane Configuration LT LTR v (veh/h) 119 444 C (m) (veh/h) 1001 333 v/c 0.12 1.33 95% queue length 0.40 21.59 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 200.9 LOS A F Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 200.9 Approach LOS -- -- F
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/2/2015 9:18 AM
Page 1 of 1Two-Way Stop Control
6/2/2015file:///C:/Users/djozity/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k4452.tmp
2010 HCS Signalized Intersection Results Summary
General Information Intersection Information
Agency ODOT Duration, h 0.25
Analyst ARCADIS Analysis Date Jun 2, 2015 Area Type Other
Jurisdiction ODOT Time Period AM DHV PHF 0.92
Intersection Bond Drive Analysis Year 2035 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
File Name Bond Drive AM DHV NoBuild.xus
Project Description 2035 AM DHV NoBuild Condition
Demand Information EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Demand (v), veh/h 10 10 30 90 10 40 20 170 130 70 200 10
Signal Information
GreenYellowRed
31.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 3 4
5 6 7 8
Cycle, s 70.0 Reference Phase 2
Offset, s 0 Reference Point End
Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On
Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On
Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Assigned Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Phase Duration, s 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0
Change Period, (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
Queue Clearance Time (gs), s 3.9 3.9 6.9 6.9 8.1 8.1 9.3 9.3
Green Extension Time (ge), s 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h 11 0 43 98 0 54 22 185 141 76 217 11
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh/h/ln 1344 0 1468 1357 0 1628 1115 1827 1579 1194 1827 1548
Queue Service time (gs ), s 0.4 0.0 1.3 3.5 0.0 1.5 0.9 4.4 3.8 3.0 5.3 0.3
Cycle Queue Clearance Time (gc), s 1.9 0.0 1.3 4.9 0.0 1.5 6.1 4.4 3.8 7.3 5.3 0.3
Capacity (c), veh/h 573 545 581 605 513 809 699 557 809 686
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) 0.019 0.000 0.080 0.168 0.000 0.090 0.042 0.228 0.202 0.137 0.269 0.016
Available Capacity (ca), veh/h 573 545 581 605 513 809 699 557 809 686
Back of Queue (Q), veh/ln 0.1 0.4 1.1 0.5 0.2 1.5 1.1 0.7 1.8 0.1
Overflow Queue (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 14.9 14.3 15.8 14.3 14.3 12.1 11.9 14.4 12.3 10.9
Incremental Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay (d), s/veh 14.9 14.3 15.9 14.3 14.3 12.1 12.0 14.4 12.4 10.9
Level of Service (LOS) B B B B B B B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.4 B 15.3 B 12.2 B 12.8 B
Intersection Delay s/veh / LOS 13.1 B
MultiModal Results EB WB NB SB
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.4 B 2.3 B 2.3 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.6 A 0.7 A 1.1 A 1.0 A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010™ Version 6.1 Generated: 6/2/2015 10:54:30 AM
2010 HCS Signalized Intersection Results Summary
General Information Intersection Information
Agency ODOT Duration, h 0.25
Analyst ARCADIS Analysis Date Jun 2, 2015 Area Type Other
Jurisdiction ODOT Time Period PM DHV PHF 0.92
Intersection Bond Drive Analysis Year 2035 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
File Name Bond Drive PM DHV NoBuild.xus
Project Description 2035 PM DHV NoBuild Condition
Demand Information EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Demand (v), veh/h 20 10 40 30 10 10 50 300 70 50 310 10
Signal Information
GreenYellowRed
31.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 3 4
5 6 7 8
Cycle, s 70.0 Reference Phase 2
Offset, s 0 Reference Point End
Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On
Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On
Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Assigned Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Phase Duration, s 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0
Change Period, (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
Queue Clearance Time (gs), s 3.7 3.7 4.8 4.8 13.6 13.6 13.1 13.1
Green Extension Time (ge), s 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h 22 0 54 33 0 22 54 326 76 54 337 11
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh/h/ln 1384 0 1457 1344 0 1709 1000 1827 1579 1050 1827 1548
Queue Service time (gs ), s 0.7 0.0 1.7 1.1 0.0 0.6 2.7 8.5 2.0 2.6 8.8 0.3
Cycle Queue Clearance Time (gc), s 1.3 0.0 1.7 2.8 0.0 0.6 11.6 8.5 2.0 11.1 8.8 0.3
Capacity (c), veh/h 606 541 569 635 420 809 699 441 809 686
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) 0.036 0.000 0.100 0.057 0.000 0.034 0.129 0.403 0.109 0.123 0.416 0.016
Available Capacity (ca), veh/h 606 541 569 635 420 809 699 441 809 686
Back of Queue (Q), veh/ln 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.6 2.9 0.6 0.6 3.0 0.1
Overflow Queue (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 14.4 14.4 15.3 14.0 17.3 13.2 11.4 17.0 13.3 10.9
Incremental Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay (d), s/veh 14.4 14.4 15.3 14.0 17.3 13.3 11.4 17.0 13.4 10.9
Level of Service (LOS) B B B B B B B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.4 B 14.8 B 13.5 B 13.9 B
Intersection Delay s/veh / LOS 13.8 B
MultiModal Results EB WB NB SB
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.4 B 2.3 B 2.3 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.6 A 0.6 A 1.2 A 1.2 A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010™ Version 6.1 Generated: 6/2/2015 10:37:26 AM
Appendix G
Intersection Analysis - Build
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARYGeneral Information Site Information
Analyst ARCADIS Agency/Co. ODOT Date Performed 4/28/2015 Analysis Time Period AM DHV
Intersection SR 149 and I-70 EB Exit Ramp
Jurisdiction ODOT Analysis Year 2035
Project Description BEL-149-23.79 East/West Street: I-70 EB Exit Ramp North/South Street: SR 149 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsMajor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 320 280 140 310 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 347 304 152 336 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 11 -- --Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 50 0 100 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 54 0 108 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 22 0 22 16 0 16 Percent Grade (%) 0 1 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ServiceApproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12Lane Configuration LT LTR v (veh/h) 152 162 C (m) (veh/h) 894 334 v/c 0.17 0.49 95% queue length 0.61 2.53 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.8 25.5 LOS A D Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 25.5 Approach LOS -- -- D
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/1/2015 3:26 PM
Page 1 of 1Two-Way Stop Control
6/1/2015file:///C:/Users/djozity/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k8EFF.tmp
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARYGeneral Information Site Information
Analyst ARCADIS Agency/Co. ODOT Date Performed 4/28/2015 Analysis Time Period PM DHV
Intersection SR 149 and I-70 EB Exit Ramp
Jurisdiction ODOT Analysis Year 2035
Project Description BEL-149-23.79 East/West Street: I-70 EB Exit Ramp North/South Street: SR 149 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsMajor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 280 270 150 460 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 304 293 163 499 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 11 -- --Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T RVolume (veh/h) 50 0 80 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 54 0 86 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles 22 0 22 16 0 16 Percent Grade (%) 0 1 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ServiceApproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12Lane Configuration LT LTR v (veh/h) 163 140 C (m) (veh/h) 937 253 v/c 0.17 0.55 95% queue length 0.63 3.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 35.5 LOS A E Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 35.5 Approach LOS -- -- E
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/1/2015 3:27 PM
Page 1 of 1Two-Way Stop Control
6/1/2015file:///C:/Users/djozity/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k4FFD.tmp
2010 HCS Signalized Intersection Results Summary
General Information Intersection Information
Agency ODOT Duration, h 0.25
Analyst ARCADIS Analysis Date Jun 2, 2015 Area Type Other
Jurisdiction ODOT Time Period AM DHV PHF 0.92
Intersection Westbound Exit Ramp Analysis Year 2035 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
File Name Exit Ramp AM DHV Build.xus
Project Description AM DHV Build Condition
Demand Information EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Demand (v), veh/h 150 140 80 290 300 90
Signal Information
GreenYellowRed
32.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 3 4
5 6 7 8
Cycle, s 70.0 Reference Phase 2
Offset, s 0 Reference Point End
Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On
Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On
Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Assigned Phase 7 8 8 2 2 1 6
Case Number 0.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 4.0
Phase Duration, s 0.0 31.0 31.0 39.0 39.0 0.0 39.0
Change Period, (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0
Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 0.0 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 0.0 3.1
Queue Clearance Time (gs), s 27.0 27.0 15.7 15.7 14.3
Green Extension Time (ge), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 0.0 1.6
Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Max Out Probability 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h 0 163 0 152 402 0 0 0 0 424
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh/h/ln 0 1601 0 1533 1332 0 0 0 0 1737
Queue Service time (gs ), s 0.0 5.1 25.0 5.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3
Cycle Queue Clearance Time (gc), s 0.0 5.1 25.0 5.0 13.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3
Capacity (c), veh/h 572 0 548 672 0 794
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) 0.000 0.285 0.000 0.278 0.599 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.534
Available Capacity (ca), veh/h 572 0 548 672 0 794
Back of Queue (Q), veh/ln 1.7 1.6 3.9 4.0
Overflow Queue (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 16.1 0.0 16.1 13.6 0.0 13.6
Incremental Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4
Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay (d), s/veh 16.2 0.0 16.2 14.7 0.0 14.0
Level of Service (LOS) B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 0.0 16.2 B 14.7 B 14.0 B
Intersection Delay s/veh / LOS 14.8 B
MultiModal Results EB WB NB SB
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.1 B 2.1 B 1.7 A 0.7 A
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.7 A 1.7 A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010™ Version 6.1 Generated: 6/2/2015 10:38:12 AM
2010 HCS Signalized Intersection Results Summary
General Information Intersection Information
Agency ODOT Duration, h 0.25
Analyst ARCADIS Analysis Date Jun 2, 2015 Area Type Other
Jurisdiction ODOT Time Period PM DHV PHF 0.92
Intersection Westbound Exit Ramp Analysis Year 2035 Analysis Period 1> 4:00
File Name Exit Ramp PM DHV Build.xus
Project Description PM DHV Build Condition
Demand Information EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Demand (v), veh/h 230 180 110 220 380 110
Signal Information
GreenYellowRed
34.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 3 4
5 6 7 8
Cycle, s 70.0 Reference Phase 2
Offset, s 0 Reference Point End
Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On
Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On
Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Assigned Phase 7 8 8 2 2 1 6
Case Number 0.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 4.0
Phase Duration, s 0.0 29.0 29.0 41.0 41.0 0.0 41.0
Change Period, (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0
Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 0.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 0.0 3.2
Queue Clearance Time (gs), s 25.0 25.0 24.1 24.1 17.9
Green Extension Time (ge), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 0.0 1.9
Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Max Out Probability 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.10 0.01
Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h 0 250 0 196 359 0 0 0 0 533
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh/h/ln 0 1601 0 1533 953 0 0 0 0 1739
Queue Service time (gs ), s 0.0 8.7 23.0 6.9 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.9
Cycle Queue Clearance Time (gc), s 0.0 8.7 23.0 6.9 22.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.9
Capacity (c), veh/h 526 0 504 532 0 845
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) 0.000 0.475 0.000 0.388 0.675 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.630
Available Capacity (ca), veh/h 526 0 504 532 0 845
Back of Queue (Q), veh/ln 3.0 2.3 4.0 5.2
Overflow Queue (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 18.7 0.0 18.1 14.0 0.0 13.3
Incremental Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay (d), s/veh 18.9 0.0 18.3 16.8 0.0 14.5
Level of Service (LOS) B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 0.0 18.6 B 16.8 B 14.5 B
Intersection Delay s/veh / LOS 16.5 B
MultiModal Results EB WB NB SB
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.1 B 2.1 B 1.7 A 0.7 A
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.6 A 1.9 A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010™ Version 6.1 Generated: 6/2/2015 10:39:34 AM
2010 HCS Signalized Intersection Results Summary
General Information Intersection Information
Agency ODOT Duration, h 0.25
Analyst ARCADIS Analysis Date Jun 2, 2015 Area Type Other
Jurisdiction ODOT Time Period AM DHV PHF 0.92
Intersection Bond Drive Analysis Year 2035 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
File Name Bond Drive AM DHV Build.xus
Project Description 2035 AM DHV Build Condition
Demand Information EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Demand (v), veh/h 10 10 30 90 10 40 20 170 130 70 200 10
Signal Information
GreenYellowRed
30.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 3 4
5 6 7 8
Cycle, s 70.0 Reference Phase 2
Offset, s 0 Reference Point End
Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On
Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On
Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Assigned Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Phase Duration, s 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0
Change Period, (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
Queue Clearance Time (gs), s 3.8 3.8 6.8 6.8 8.3 8.3 9.5 9.5
Green Extension Time (ge), s 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h 11 0 43 98 0 54 22 185 141 76 217 11
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh/h/ln 1344 0 1468 1357 0 1628 1115 1827 1579 1194 1827 1548
Queue Service time (gs ), s 0.4 0.0 1.3 3.4 0.0 1.5 0.9 4.5 3.9 3.0 5.4 0.3
Cycle Queue Clearance Time (gc), s 1.8 0.0 1.3 4.8 0.0 1.5 6.3 4.5 3.9 7.5 5.4 0.3
Capacity (c), veh/h 593 566 601 628 495 783 677 538 783 664
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) 0.018 0.000 0.077 0.163 0.000 0.087 0.044 0.236 0.209 0.141 0.278 0.016
Available Capacity (ca), veh/h 593 566 601 628 495 783 677 538 783 664
Back of Queue (Q), veh/ln 0.1 0.4 1.1 0.5 0.2 1.6 1.2 0.8 1.9 0.1
Overflow Queue (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 14.3 13.6 15.1 13.7 15.0 12.7 12.6 15.1 13.0 11.5
Incremental Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay (d), s/veh 14.3 13.6 15.2 13.7 15.0 12.8 12.6 15.2 13.0 11.5
Level of Service (LOS) B B B B B B B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.8 B 14.6 B 12.8 B 13.5 B
Intersection Delay s/veh / LOS 13.5 B
MultiModal Results EB WB NB SB
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.4 B 2.3 B 2.3 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.6 A 0.7 A 1.1 A 1.0 A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010™ Version 6.1 Generated: 6/2/2015 10:32:53 AM
2010 HCS Signalized Intersection Results Summary
General Information Intersection Information
Agency ODOT Duration, h 0.25
Analyst ARCADIS Analysis Date Jun 2, 2015 Area Type Other
Jurisdiction ODOT Time Period PM DHV PHF 0.92
Intersection Bond Drive Analysis Year 2035 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
File Name Bond Drive PM DHV Build.xus
Project Description 2035 PM DHV Build Condition
Demand Information EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Demand (v), veh/h 20 10 40 30 10 10 50 300 70 50 310 10
Signal Information
GreenYellowRed
30.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.05.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 3 4
5 6 7 8
Cycle, s 70.0 Reference Phase 2
Offset, s 0 Reference Point End
Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On
Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On
Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Assigned Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Phase Duration, s 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0
Change Period, (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
Queue Clearance Time (gs), s 3.7 3.7 4.8 4.8 13.9 13.9 13.3 13.3
Green Extension Time (ge), s 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16
Adjusted Flow Rate (v), veh/h 22 0 54 33 0 22 54 326 76 54 337 11
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh/h/ln 1384 0 1457 1344 0 1709 1000 1827 1579 1050 1827 1548
Queue Service time (gs ), s 0.7 0.0 1.7 1.1 0.0 0.6 2.8 8.7 2.0 2.7 9.0 0.3
Cycle Queue Clearance Time (gc), s 1.2 0.0 1.7 2.8 0.0 0.6 11.9 8.7 2.0 11.3 9.0 0.3
Capacity (c), veh/h 626 562 589 659 402 783 677 422 783 664
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) 0.035 0.000 0.097 0.055 0.000 0.033 0.135 0.416 0.112 0.129 0.430 0.016
Available Capacity (ca), veh/h 626 562 589 659 402 783 677 422 783 664
Back of Queue (Q), veh/ln 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.6 3.0 0.6 0.6 3.1 0.1
Overflow Queue (Q3), veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 13.8 13.7 14.6 13.4 18.2 13.9 12.0 17.9 14.0 11.5
Incremental Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay (d), s/veh 13.8 13.7 14.6 13.4 18.2 14.0 12.0 17.9 14.2 11.5
Level of Service (LOS) B B B B B B B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.8 B 14.1 B 14.2 B 14.6 B
Intersection Delay s/veh / LOS 14.3 B
MultiModal Results EB WB NB SB
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.4 B 2.4 B 2.3 B 2.3 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.6 A 0.6 A 1.2 A 1.2 A
Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010™ Version 6.1 Generated: 6/2/2015 10:57:44 AM