Download - ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO
![Page 1: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO
IntroductionEmittance
Single bunch and multi-bunch in DRExtracted beam
Wiggler studyOther experiment, Instrumentation development, etc.
Polarized positron productionOptical Diffraction RadiationLaser WireCavity BPM Intra train Feedback, , , , ,
![Page 2: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
ATF: Accelerator Test FacilityPrimarily for LC study
Electron Linac
Extraction Line
Linac
Damping Ring
E=1.3GeVNe=1x1010 e-/bunch1 ~ 20 bunches/train1 ~ 3 trains/ring
![Page 3: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
ATF operation International collaboration
• ATF operates for 21 weeks/year; 110 hours/week
• Participation from outside Japan greatly increased 2004/05 (25 visiting researchers including 10 students/post-docs)– Will use 30% of beam time this year
• Host duties shared between KEK/SLAC• Operation fully supported by KEK
M.Ross
![Page 4: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Single bunch Transverse Emittance
y/x emittance ratio <0.5% (y ~ 1.5E-8 m) is constantly achieved in single bunch operation.
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
0 2 109 4 109 6 109 8 109 1 1010
Horizontal Emittancex emittance (run B)x emittance (run D)simulation (0.4% coupling)
x e
mit
tan
ce [
10-9
]
bunch intensity [electrons/bunch]
GLC Design
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
0 2 109 4 109 6 109 8 109 1 1010
Vertical Emittancey emittance (run B)y emittance (run D)simulation (0.4% coupling)
y e
mit
tan
ce [
10-1
2]
bunch intensity [electrons/bunch]
GLC Design
in the damping ring measured by Laser wire
![Page 5: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Multibunch Vertical Emittance in the damping ring measured by Laser wire
Laser wire measures projected profileof many turns.Oscillation is appeared to be beam size blow up.
0.0 100
1.0 10-11
2.0 10-11
3.0 10-11
4.0 10-11
5.0 10-11
0 5 10 15 20
Vertical Emittance of Multibunch
Y_emittance(00mode, 1.6E9intensity)Y_emittance(00mode, 3.7E9intensity)Y_emittance(01mode, 6.3E9intensity)
Ver
tica
l E
mit
tan
ce o
f ea
ch b
un
ch
Bunch Number
1.6x109
3.7x109
6.3x109
GLC Design
Emittance Versus Bunch Number
0.00E+00
1.00E-08
2.00E-08
3.00E-08
4.00E-08
5.00E-08
6.00E-08
0 5 10 15 20 25
BunchN
orm
aliz
ed Y
Em
itta
nce
6.00E+09
3.70E+09
1.60E+09
Schematic of the Fast-Beam Ion Instability
Fast beam ion instability simulation
(by T.Raubenheimer)
![Page 6: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Effect of ‘scrubbing’
Fast ion instability has been observed as multibunch emittance blow up measured by Laser Wire at high intensity.
‘Scrubbing’ (improving vacuum level) was expected to suppress the instability.But, it has not been fully confirmed yet.
Due to a vacuum accident in January 2005, it will be delayed.
No big blow up of the tail bunches after ‘scrubbing’.But emittance tuning was not sufficiently good.
Vertical beamsize vs. bunch number
After ‘scrubbing’ 5.5 A hour
![Page 7: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Extracted beam emittance is larger than in the damping ring.Unknown higher order fields in the kickers and the septum magnetsare suspected.(Kicker will be replaced in this summer.)
Vertical emittance of extracted beam
0
5 10-12
1 10-11
1.5 10-11
2 10-11
2.5 10-11
3 10-11
0 2 109 4 109 6 109 8 109 1 1010
Extracted, wire scannerIn DR, laser wireIn DR, laser wire
y (m
)
N
Vertical emittance vs. bunch population.
Emittance in DR was measured by Laser wire,in extraction line by wire scanners.
![Page 8: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Wiggler study
Correction of end poles.
Started in Oct. 2005.Basic performance with wigglers
damping timesemittances
Effects of non-linear field of wigglers.dynamic aperture
Total Length 2.0 mOne period 0.4 mFull gap 20 mmBpeak 1.62 T (1000A)Beff 1.40 T (1000 A)Current/pole 20 KA (20 turns)Number of poles 9(full) + 2(half)
![Page 9: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Wiggler off calc. Wiggler on calc.
x (ms) 19.3 + - 0.63 17.5 15.7 + - 0.38 14.2
y (ms) 28.8 + - 1.5 28.5 25.4 + - 0.67 21.1
z (ms) 21.4 + - 3.9 20.5 14.2 + - 2.4 14.0
Damping time with/without wigglers (preliminary).
Horizontal beam size vs. time.(Extracted beam.)
without wigglerwith wiggler
![Page 10: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Horizontal and Vertical emittance w/wo wigglers.
Horizontal emittance with wigglers was smaller than that without wigglers, as expected.
Small vertical emittance was achieved both with and without wigglers.
![Page 11: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Preliminary test of effect of wigglers to dynamic aperture. Non-linear field of wigglers is expected to reduce dynamic aperture.
Beam life time w/wo wigglers vs. horizontal tune.
without wiggler
with wiggler
x
B
eam
life
tim
e (S
)
![Page 12: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Other Beam studies• Compton-based Polarized Positron production • ODR (Optical Diffraction Radiation for beam monitors) • FEATHER(KEK)/FONT(QMUL) (intra-pulse orbit feedbac
k)• RF-gun (high quality multibunch beam generation)• SR monitors ( interference, streak, longitudinal osc.) • XSR (beam size monitor using X-ray synchrotron radiation)• Laser Wire in Damping Ring (CW and Pulse stacking) • Laser Wire in extraction line (will start in 2005) • Cavity BPM (SLAC+ and KEK+) • ring-BPM (SLAC +) • Beam dynamics in DR (LBL, KEK, , , , ,)
![Page 13: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Polarized gamma-ray production byPolarized Laser light – electron collision
Polarized positron production experiment
T.Omori
![Page 14: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14T.Omori
![Page 15: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Measured Asymmetry and polarization of e+
A= +0.71± 0.23 %
A= -1.1± 0.23 %
Magnet polarity
Laser polarity
preliminary
Pol(e)=99± 22%
Laser polarityMagnet polarity
statistical error only
T.Omori
![Page 16: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
ODR (Optical Diffraction Radiation) study at ATF
![Page 17: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Measurements of the ODR projected vertical polarization component using a photomultiplier (PMT) and comparison with the theory
mrad14.0
mrad9.5
y
x
Detector acceptance
y
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
Inte
nsi
ty n
orm
aliz
ed b
y m
uxi
mu
m.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
ODR
Intensity and angular distribution ofODR was consistent with calculations.
ODR by P.KarataevBeam size, y (m)
0 10 20 30
min
imu
m /
max
imu
m
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
(minimum/maximum)
y
Beam size is evaluated from bottom/top ratio.
![Page 18: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Comparison of the beam sizes measured with ODR and wire scanners
Wire beam size (m)
0 10 20 30
OD
R b
eam
siz
e (
m)
0
10
20
30
Correlation between the the ODR and the beam size measured with 10m tungsten wire installed in the target chamber at the same position as the target. The black line represents a 45 degree line.
ODR by P.Karataev
![Page 19: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
y (mm)-6 -3 0 3 6
x (m
m)
-6
-3
0
3
6
A new technique for beam size measurement using ODR from a ‘dis-phased’ target.
A new model for calculating diffraction radiation (DR) characteristics from a charged particle moving through a slit between two flat plates inclined with respect to each other around the axis perpendicular to the slit has been developed. A one-dimensional lens can bring two DR cones together producing an interference pattern, which is very sensitive to transversal electron beam size. The sensitivity in this case depends on the DR observation wavelength and the angle between the planes. The analysis of the model shows that this technique allows to measure sub-micron beam sizes.
2
e _
x s
y s
4
a ina out
b out
ODR geometry
ODR interference pattern that could be observed with a
CCD
ODR by P.Karataev
![Page 20: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
714MHz (21cm) Optical resonator cavity(Cavity length should be controlled ~1nm for resonance)
Electron beam: bunch spacing 1/357 MHz (2.8 ns)
Laser Pulse. =1064 nmPulse length = 2 mm
Repetition 357MHz(Spacing should be controlled ~ 1 m for pulse stacking)
Scattered Photon(Detected)
Compton Scattering, 357MHz
• High intensity hard X-ray source• Beam monitor
Application
Penetrated light: Monitored for cavity length feedback
Pulse Stacking Laser Wire Test in ATF DRPulse Laser Wire (K.Takezawa)
Mirrors: optical resonator
![Page 21: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Damping Ring
12.7 m
4.8 m
electronLaser wire
Collimetor: 0.2mrad -> photon energy 12 ~ 14.5 MeV
Detector
Backgroundsubtraction
Pulse Laser Wire (K.Takezawa)
Enhancement by factor 50 was confirmed. = CW laser by factor 10000
![Page 22: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Electron bunch length was measured.
Laser Timing (ps)0 2008040 120 140
Count (Hz/mA)
800
1000
600
400
200
Bunch length
Count rate vs. Timing
RF system of Damping Ring(Define electron bunch timing.)
(Laser pulse length ~ 2 mm << electron bunch length)
Pulse Laser Wire (K.Takezawa)
Proof of principle of enhancement of pulse laser by resonatorwas done. For practical use, higher intensity is necessary. Optical cavity with amplification factor 500, waist size 50 m is designed. (present cavity: factor 50, waist size 250 m )
![Page 23: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
UK: Pulsed Laser-wire at the ATF Extraction Line
• University of Oxford:N. Delerue, B. Foster, D. Howell, A.ReicholdI. Ross (CCLRC)
• Royal Holloway University London:I. Agapov, G. Blair, G. Boorman, J.Carter, C. Driouichi, M.Price
• University College London:S. Boogert, S. Malton
• KEK:H. Hayano, P. Karataev, K. Kubo, J.Urakawa
• SLAC:J. Frisch, M. Ross
Start in March and full system commissioning by December
• Goal: Measure the electron beam profile with a resolution of ~1 m.
G. Blair
![Page 24: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
2 cavity BPM triplets in the ATF Extraction line
2 x 600 mm triplets of cavity BPM’s; spacing ~ 5 m.
KEK
US
A cavity triplet is used to determine resolution
M.Ross
Cavity BPM Study
![Page 25: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Cavity BPM nm resolution study (US)
LLNL Design frameShould be very rigid;relative position jitter due to vibration < nm.
![Page 26: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Cavity BPM resolution tests:Residual of center BPM wrt predicted position from 1st and 3rd.Rms <20 nm for 600 pulsesPlot scale is +80 / -60 nm
(results from 12.04; first commissioning run)
M.Ross
BPM resolution = rms*sqrt(2/3) 17 nm
![Page 27: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Long term stability (for 1 hour) - average residual of 40 sets of pulse sequences (4e3 pulses total); rms offset drift = 44 nm.
M.Ross
200
nm
![Page 28: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Y.Honda
Totally different idea of support and position control.
(KEK)
![Page 29: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29UK LCABD Collaboration LCPAC2005, KEK 25/02/05
• FONT: Queen Mary: Philip Burrows, Glen White, Glenn Christian,
Hamid Dabiri Khah, Tony Hartin, Stephen Molloy, Christine Clarke
Daresbury Lab: Alexander Kalinin, Roy Barlow, Mike Dufau
Oxford: Colin Perry, Gerald Myatt
SLAC: Joe Frisch, Tom Markiewicz, Marc Ross, Chris Adolphsen, Keith Jobe, Doug McCormick, Janice Nelson, Tonee Smith,
Steve Smith, Mark Woodley
• FEATHER: KEK: Toshiaki Tauchi, Hitoshi Hayano
Tokyo Met. University: Takayuki Sumiyoshi, Hiroyuki Fujimoto
• Simulations: Nick Walker (DESY), Daniel Schulte (CERN)
Fast FB (Intra-pulse orbit feedback)International Collaboration
![Page 30: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30UK LCABD Collaboration LCPAC2005, KEK 25/02/05
FONT3 at ATF (started Nov 2003)Original aim: • Demonstrate micron-level stabilisation of 1.3 GeV ATF beam with
latency c. 20 ns for warm machine.• Worth completing, though low latency critical only for CLIC
Adjustable-gap kicker
BPM ML11X
Feedback
SuperfastBPM processor
Superfastamplifier
BPM ML12X
BPM ML13X
Correct orbit of tail bunches using information of head bunches
beam
![Page 31: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
FONT3 BPM processor (single-bunch data from December 2004 beam tests)
Latency~ 4 nsBPM
UK LCABD Collaboration LCPAC2005, KEK 25/02/05
![Page 32: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32UK LCABD Collaboration LCPAC2005, KEK 25/02/05
Possible Future Beam Feedback Tests
Short-term: expect to finish FONT3 in 2005
Long-term:
demonstrate robust intra-train FB system for ILC, based on digital signal processing, and ideally test with beam:
requires long bunchtrain with 337 ns bunch spacing
2005-6: FONT4: 3 bunches x 150 ns at ATF would allow first tests:
stabilise last bunch at 100 nm level (?) as part of Nano project
also feed-forward studies ring -> extraction line?
2007: FONT5: 20 bunches x 337ns at ATF/ATF2 would allow FB algorithm development
![Page 33: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
ATF is intended to:1. generate the low emittance beam needed for the linear colli
der and
2. test the required precision control and monitoring technology
• Low emittance beam that needed in LC was demonstrated– Typical damped beam y: 4 pm-rad, y: 0.1 nm-rad at
1.3 GeV (typical beam size = 5 µm)– (emittances required in the TESLA design: y: 2 pm-rad,
y: 0.2 nm-rad at 5 GeV)– Multibunch operation and extracted beam have problem
s.
Summary-1
M.Ross, K.Kubo
![Page 34: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Summary-2 : Role of ATF in the next stage of the ILC project
• Beam dynamics study– emittance tuning and coupling control 1 pm-rad – performance with wiggler– fast ion instability
• Extraction kicker RD – aimed at the damping ring ‘footprint’ decision – Snowmass 08.05
• Extracted beam– precision instrumentation
• cavity BPM’s, laser-based profile monitors– feedback / stabilization
• fast ‘within the train’ feedback• laser-interferometric geodesic structure
• Small, stable ATF beam is a unique resource
M.Ross
![Page 35: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Summary-3 : ILC Injector study list (from Int’l workshop 11.04):
– DR footprint; pre-damping ring– fast rise / fall time extraction– emittance tuning– collective effects e cloud / fast beam ion– wiggler optimization and dynamic aperture
• ATF can address most of these and Beam Delivery list also – with extracted beam
Injector study plans Next speaker(s)
M.Ross
![Page 36: ATF Status LCPAC 2005.02.25 K.KUBO](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062806/56814f32550346895dbcc4d0/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
ATF Plans for 2005• MB emittance study Y emittance will be confirmed by Laser Wire after scrubbing.• Wiggler study Effect of non-linear field to dynamic aperture.• High quality beam extraction multi-pole component of kicker and septum are under study.• nm resolution BPM test & demonstration Development of new precise mover & new cavity-BPM electronics.
• Fast feedback test & demonstration Basic test of feedforward and feedback are under way. Fast feedback test by 3 train extraction (ILC-like bunch spacing) will be done.
• Fast Kicker for ILC damping ring Fast pulse power supply and strip line kicker system will be tested.
• Instrumentation developments LW, XSR monitor, ODR monitor, MB-BPM, (SB, MB) longitudinal feedback, etc.
• Preparation of ‘ATF-2’