Download - Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
1/55
Post-award remedies in ICSID
arbitration- with a focus on ICSID annulment process -
Dan PetrachePhD Candidate - Private International LawFaculty of Law, University of Bucharest
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
2/55
he award ! ri"unal#s last decision whichdisposes of the case$
he award is rendered when ICSID dispatchescerti%ed copies of the award to the parties&'rticle () of the ICSID Convention, 'r"itration*ule (+&
he award is %nal and "indin. and may "ereco.ni/ed and enforced in any ICSID 0em"erState1
The award
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
3/55
2o appeal, "ut 3 means of remedy4 *ecti%cation &art1 ()
Supplementary Decision &art1 ()
Interpretation &art1 35
*evision &art1 36
'nnulment &art1 3
Uni7ue feature of ICSID4 autonomous nature &localCourts have no involvement in the ICSID
proceedin.s
!8 2o role of the local courts in what concerns theremedies
Five post-award remedies
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
4/55
'rt1 () & of the Convention4
The Tribunal upon the request of a party madewithin 45 days after the date on which the award
was rendered may after notice to the other partydecide any question which it had omitted todecide in the award, and shall rectify anyclerical, arithmetical or similar error in theaward.
Supplementary decision orrectifcation (I)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
5/55
Conditions to "e ful%lled when su"mittin. are7uest for a supplementary decision 9recti%cation within the (3 days term4identifyin. the award$
indicatin. the date of the re7uest$
detailin. the 7uestion the ri"unal omitted todecide and9or the error that it see:s to rectify$and
payin. a lod.in. fee of US;65,5551
Supplementary decision orrectifcation (II)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
6/55
the re7uest is resolved "y the same ri"unalthat rendered the award$
&usually no need for a hearin.$
If a party su"se7uently wishes to resort toother remedies under the Convention, the
time limits for such remedies are measuredfrom the date on which the decision wasissued1
Supplementary decision orrectifcation (III)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
7/55
'rt1 35 &6 of the Convention4If any dispute shall arise between the parties asto the meaning or scope of an award, either
party may request interpretation of the award
by an application in writing addressed to theSecretary-General.
Interpretation o the award (I)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
8/55
Conditions to "e ful%lled "y the re7uest forinterpretation4identify the award$
indicate the date of the application$
detail the precise points in dispute$ and"e accompanied "y a lod.in. fee of US;65,5551
2o time limit for %lin. an application for
interpretation1
Interpretation o the award (II)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
9/55
It would "e ade7uate that the same ri"unal resolvesthe re7uest for interpretation$
If the ri"unal cannot "e reconstituted with the
ori.inal mem"ers, the parties are invited toconstitute a new ri"unal &same num"er ofar"itrators usin. the same method as the ori.inalone$
the conduct of an interpretation proceedin. is similarto the conduct of an ar"itration - the decision oninterpretation "ecomes part o the award!
Interpretation o the award (III)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
10/55
'rt1 36 of the Convention4ither party may request re!ision of the award by an
application in writing addressed to the Secretary-General on the ground of discovery of some fact
of such a nature as decisively to aect theaward, pro!ided that when the award was renderedthat fact was un"nown to the Tribunal and to theapplicant and that the applicant#s ignorance of thatfact was not due to negligence.
"evision (I)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
11/55
Conditions - the re7uest for revision must4 identify the award$
indicate the date of the application$
detail the chan.e sou.ht in the award$
descri"e the new fact that decisively a
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
12/55
It would "e ade7uate that the same ri"unalresolves the re7uest for interpretation$
If the ri"unal cannot "e reconstituted with the
ori.inal mem"ers, the parties are invited toconstitute a new ri"unal &same num"er ofar"itrators usin. the same method as the ori.inalone$
the conduct of a revision proceedin. is similar to theconduct of an ar"itration - the decision on revision"ecomes part o the award!
"evision (III)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
13/55
'rt1 3 &6 of the Convention4ither party may request annulment of the award byan application in writing addressed to the Secretary-General on one or more of the following grounds$
that the Tribunal was not properly constituted%that the Tribunal has manifestly e&ceeded its powers%
that there was corruption on the part of amember of the Tribunal%
that there has been a serious departure from a
fundamental rule of procedure% orthat the award has failed to state the reasons
on which it is based.
#nnulment o the award
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
14/55
he application must4 identify the award to which it relates$
Indicate the date of the application$
state in detail the .rounds on which it is "ased
pursuant to 'rticle 3&6 of the ICSID Convention$and
"e accompanied "y a ;3555 fee for lod.in. theapplication1
Conditions or the annulmentre$uest
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
15/55
he re7uest for annulment must "e %ledwithin 65 days after the date on which theaward &or any supplementary decision orcorrection was rendered1
=>ception4 in the case of corruption on thepart of a ri"unal mem"er, the applicationmay "e %led within 65 days after discovery
of the corruption, and in any event withinthree years after the date on which theaward was rendered1
Timerame constraints
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
16/55
'ould a party submit an application forannulment concerning a decision issued priorto the award, e.g. a decision on a challenge,a pro!isional measure, or a decisionupholding (urisdiction)
%&'STI
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
17/55
'ppointed "y the Chairman of the'dministrative Council$
'lways composed of three ar"itrators$
*d hoc Committee mem"ers are appointedonly from the ICSID Panel of 'r"itrators$
#ppointment o theAd-HocCommittee
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
18/55
he function of an ad hoc Committee4 tore?ect the application for annulment or toannul the award or a part thereof on the"asis of the .rounds enumerated in 'rticle31
Its function is not to rule on the merits of
the parties# dispute &even if it decides toannul the award1
Function o theAd-HocCommittee
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
19/55
he mem"er cannot have "een a mem"erof the ri"unal that rendered the award$
he mem"er cannot have the samenationality as any of the ri"unal#s mem"ers
he mem"er cannot have the same
nationality as the disputin. parties andcannot have "een desi.nated to the Panel"y the host state or "y investor#s State1
Specifc re$uirements on themembers o the ad hoc Committee
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
20/55
Before the name of the candidate is proposedto the parties, the Centre4researches whether there are any con@icts of interest
and, &if none are found
's:s the candidate to con%rm that he9she is free ofany con@icts, has time to dedicate to the proceedin.,and is willin. to act as a mem"er of the ad hocCommittee
It ta:es A- wee:s since the annulmentapplication to appoint the ad-hoc Committee1
#ppointment the ad hocCommittee
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
21/55
'pplicant vs1 *espondent &*espondent on'nnulment
he 'r"itration *ules apply, mutatis mutandis,to the proceedin. "efore the ad hocCommittee1
'ssumption that the parties# procedurala.reements in the ori.inal proceedin. willremain the same in the annulment proceedin.
Procedure
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
22/55
2onetheless, the ad hoc Committee usually convenes a %rstsession with the parties to discuss procedural matters &it is notuncommon to a.ree on diampleconcernin. the applica"le rules, procedural lan.ua.e and place
of proceedin.s1 In most cases, the parties a.ree on a timeta"le involvin. two
rounds of pleadin.s on the application for annulment &0emorial,Counter-0emorial, *eply and *e?oinder and an oral hearin.1
he time allowed for written pleadin.s rarely e>ceeded ( monthsper party for the %rst round and months per party for thesecond round1
Procedure (II)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
23/55
Unli:e the ri"unal proceedin.s, the'pplicant is solely responsi"le for ma:in. alladvance payments re7uested "y ICSID in anannulment proceedin., unless the partiesa.ree otherwise1
he Costs of Proceedin. for annulments
avera.e US;35,555 (55,5551
Costs
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
24/55
'n 'pplicant may in its application for annulment, or eitherparty may at any time durin. the proceedin., re7uest astay of enforcement of all or part of the ri"unal award1
' Committee may terminate a stay if the party re7uestin.
the stay of enforcement has failed to ful%ll a condition forthe stay ordered "y the Committee &e1.1, the provision ofade7uate %nancial security in respect of the amount dueunder the award1
If a stay is not terminated durin. the proceedin., itterminates automatically upon the issuance of the ad hocCommittee#s %nal decision on annulment
Stay o enorcement o theaward
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
25/55
he hearin. lasts 6- days$
It is usually limited to the parties# oral
ar.uments and, in some cases, toe>amination of le.al e>perts whose opinionswere su"mitted "y the parties in theannulment proceedin.1
factual witnesses do not usually have anyrole in the process
*earin+ and post-hearin+ phase
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
26/55
he ad hoc Committee invites the parties to %lesu"missions on costs and sometimes also to %lepost-hearin. "riefs1
he ad hoc Committee closes the proceedin.once the presentation of the annulment case isconcluded and the Committee has madepro.ress in the deli"erations1
It must issue the decision on annulment within65 days from the date of closure1
*earin+ and post-hearin+ phase
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
27/55
he proceedin. ends with the ad hocCommittee#s decision on annulment1
he Committee may4 re?ect all .rounds for annulment, meanin. that the award
remains intact$
uphold one or more .rounds for annulment in respect of a
part of the award, leadin. to a partial annulment$
uphold one or more .rounds for annulment in respect of
the entire award, meanin. that the whole of the award isannulled$ or
e>ercise their discretion not to annul notwithstandin. thatan error has "een identi%ed1
The decision on #nnulment(I)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
28/55
he proceedin. may also "e discontinued"efore the Committee issues a %naldecision1
*easons for discontinuance4the parties a.ree on a settlement$
a party does not o"?ect to the other party#sre7uest for discontinuance, due to nonpayment ofthe advances re7uested "y ICSID to cover the
Costs of Proceedin.$the parties fail to ta:e any steps in the
proceedin. durin. si> consecutive months1
The decision on annulment(II)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
29/55
Is not an award !8 not su"?ect to anyfurther annulment proceedin.$
it is e7uated to an award for purposes of its"indin. force, reco.nition and enforcement$
he decision must contain the elements
re7uired in an award
Decision on annulment vs!award
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
30/55
Should the ad-hoc Committee deal with allthe 7uestions raised in the applicationEone ad hoc Committee has opined that, once an
award is annulled in full on any .round, it is
unnecessary to e>amine whether other .rounds mayalso lead to annulment &Sempra Case, para1 +
ther ad hoc Committees e>amined all .roundsraised, even where one of these .rounds warrantedfull annulment &*mco I, para1 6A$ +lc"ner I, para1
+
%uestion
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
31/55
the award or a part thereof "ecomes a nullity, meanin.that the "indin. force of the annulled portion of theaward is terminated$
the decision on annulment does not replace the awardor su"stitute any of the reasonin. in the award$
' party is entitled to re7uest resu"mission of thedispute "y a newly constituted ri"unal to o"tain a new
award concernin. the same dispute followin.annulment of the ori.inal award &re7uest forresu"mission
'ects o annulment
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
32/55
annulment was desi.ned purposefully toconfer a limited scope of review whichwould safe.uard a.ainst violation of thefundamental principles of law .overnin. the
ri"unal#s proceedin.s1
he remedy has thus "een characteri/ed as
one concernin. Gprocedural errors in thedecisional processH rather than an in7uiryinto the su"stance of the award1
Scope o the annulmentmechanism
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
33/55
he .rounds listed in 'rticle 3&6 are the only .rounds onwhich an award may "e annulled$
G'laimants and espondent agree that an ad hoc 'ommitteeis not a court of appeal and that its competence e&tends
only to annulment based on one or other of the groundse&pressly set out in *rticle 5 of the I'SI/ 'on!ention.H -0i!endi I, para1 A1
The role of the 'ommittee is con1ned to the grounds of
annulment in *rticle 5 of the I'SI/ 'on!ention, and asnoted abo!e, even if the Tribunal erred in law, thiswould not be a ground for annulment.2 - nron 'ase,para1 1
,imited +rounds orannulment
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
34/55
'nnulment is an e>ceptional and narrowlycircumscri"ed remedy and the role of an ad hocCommittee is limited1
3It is not contested by the parties that theannulment re!iew, although ob!iously important,is a limited e&ercise, and does not pro!ide for anappeal of the initial award.2 - ussein 2uaman
Soufra:i v1 United 'ra" =mirates, Decision of thead hoc Committee on the 'pplication for'nnulment of 0r1 Soufra:i, para1 51
,imited role o theCommittee
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
35/55
o appeal no review on the merits.
3The law applied by the Tribunal will be e&aminedby the ad hoc 'ommittee, not for the purpose of
scrutiniing whether the Tribunal committederrors in the interpretation of the requirements ofapplicable law or in the ascertainment ore!aluation of the rele!ant facts to which such law
has been applied. Such scrutiny is properly thetas" of a court of appeals, which the ad hoc'ommittee is not.2 - 'mco Case, para1 1
The Committee is no court oappeal
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
36/55
GIt is a.reed "y all that 'rticle 3 does notintroduce an appeal facility "ut only a facilitymeant to uphold and stren.then the inte.rity ofthe ICSID process1 In the reaty, the possi"ility of
annulment is in this connection "ased on speci%cand limited .rounds1H 0i!endi II 'ase, para. 41
G'ven the most evident error o act in an
award is not in itsel a +round orannulment1H - 'onsortium .6.'.'. !. +ingdomof 7orocco,para. .
The Committee is no court oappeal (II)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
37/55
'd hoc Committees should e>ercise their discretion not todefeat the o"?ect and purpose of the remedy or erode the"indin. force and %nality of awards
3*n ad hoc 'ommittee retains a measure of discretion in
ruling on applications for annulment. To be sure, itsdiscretion is not unlimited and should not be e&ercised tothe point of defeating the ob(ect and purpose of the remedyof annulment. It may, howe!er, refuse to e&ercise itsauthority to annul an award where annulment is clearly not
required to remedy procedural in(ustice and annulmentwould un(usti1ably erode the binding force and 1nality ofI'SI/ awards.2 - 0aritime International 2ominees=sta"lishment v1 *epu"lic of Juinea, para1 (165
The Committee should protectthe e/ects o the award
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
38/55
Gan ad hoc committee has a certain measure ofdiscretion as to whether to annul an award, e!en if anannullable error is found... *mong other things, it isnecessary for an ad hoc committee to consider thesigni1cance of the error relati!e to the legal rights of
the partiesH &Kivendi I, para1 AA1
G*n ad hoc 'ommittee should not decide to annul anaward unless it is con!inced that there has been a
substantial !iolation of a rule protected by *rticle 5.2Patric: 0itchell v1 Democratic *epu"lic of the Con.o,para1 6)1
The Committee should protectthe e/ects o the award
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
39/55
'rticle 3 should "e interpreted in accordancewith its ob0ect and purpose neither narrowlynor broadly
3application of the paragraph demands neither anarrow interpretation, nor a broad interpretation,but an appropriate interpretation, ta"ing intoaccount the legitimate concern to surround thee&ercise of the remedy to the ma&imum e&tent
possible with guarantees in order to achie!e aharmonious balance between the !ariousob(ecti!es of the 'on!ention.2 -loc:ner, para1 1
Interpretation o the annulmentmechanism (I)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
40/55
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
41/55
an ad hoc Committee has discretion withrespect to the e1tent o an annulment i!e!either ull or partial!
38here a ground for annulment is established, it isfor the ad hoc committee, and not the requestingparty, to determine the e&tent of the annulment. Inma"ing this determination, the committee is notbound by the applicant#s characterisation of its
request, whether in the original application orotherwise, as requiring either complete or partialannulment of the award.2- 0i!endi I, para1 A)1
'1tent o the annulment
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
42/55
a Improper Constitution of the ri"unal$" 0anifest e>cess of powers$
c Corruption$
d Serious departure from a fundamental ruleof procedure$
e Failure to state reasons$
)0ost invo:ed4 ", d and e1
2rounds or annulment
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
43/55
Situations envisa.ed4 a departure from the parties#a.reement on the method of constitutin. the ri"unal or anar"itrator#s failure to meet the nationality or otherre7uirements for "ecomin. a mem"er of the ri"unal$
ri"unals as: the parties whether they have any o"?ection tothe constitution of the ri"unal or to any individual mem"erdurin. the ri"unal#s %rst session dealin. with proceduralmatters$
If a ri"unal decides that it has "een properly constitutedfollowin. an o"?ection "y a party, that party must await theri"unal#s award "efore %lin. an application for annulmenton this .round1
Improper Constitution o theTribunal
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
44/55
he tri"unal went "eyond the scope of theparties# ar"itration a.reement, decidedpoints which had not "een su"mitted to it,or failed to apply the law a.reed to "y the
parties1
0ethodolo.ical approaches4a two-step analysis determinin. whether there was an e>cess of
powers and, if so, whether the e>cess was GmanifestHa prima facie test, consistin. of a summary e>amination to
determine whether any of the alle.ed e>cesses of power could"e viewed as Gmanifest1H
3aniest e1cess o powers
3 i
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
45/55
wo interpretations of the concept4 an e>cess that is o"vious, clear or self-evident,
and which is discerna"le without the need for anela"orate analysis of the award &ma?ority#s
interpretation$some ad hoc Committees have interpreted the
meanin. of GmanifestH to re7uire that the e>cess"e serious or material to the outcome of the case1
3aniest e1cess o powers(II)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
46/55
'd hoc Committees have held that there may"e an e>cess of powers if a ri"unal incorrectlyconcludes that it has 0urisdiction when inact 0urisdiction is lac4in+, or when the
ri"unal e1ceeds the scope o its0urisdiction1
It has "een reco.ni/ed, in the inverse case,
that a ri"unal#s re?ection of ?urisdiction when?urisdiction e>ists also amounts to an e>cessof powers1 0i!endi I, para1 +A1
3'P "elatin+ to 5urisdiction
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
47/55
a ri"unal#s failure to apply the proper lawcould constitute a manifest e>cess ofpowers, "ut that erroneous application ofthe law could not amount to an annulla"le
error, even if it is manifest1
there is no "asis for an annulment due to an
incorrect decision "y a ri"unal, a principlethat has "een e>pressly reco.ni/ed "ymany ad hoc Committees1
3'P "elatin+ to the #pplicable,aw
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
48/55
Some ad hoc Committees have concluded that.ross misapplication or misinterpretation of thelaw may lead to annulment Sempra Case,para1 6A(1
thers have found that such an approachcomes too close to an appeal1 7I9 Case,paras1 315 and 315(1
there is a %ne line "etween failure to apply theproper law and erroneous application of the law
3'P "elatin+ to the #pplicable,aw
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
49/55
the ar"itrator is re7uired to si.n adeclaration that he or she Gshall not acceptany instruction or compensation with regardto the proceeding from any source e&cept
as pro!ided in the I'SI/ 'on!ention1H
'n ar"itrator#s conduct in "reach of that
declaration can thus lead to annulment ofan award1
Corruption o a Tribunal 3ember
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
50/55
Mide connotation &however, it e>cludesri"unal#s failure to o"serve ordinaryar"itration rule$
Fundamental rule of procedure ! principleof procedure$
his .round is concerned with theinte+rity and airness o the arbitralprocess1
Serious Departure rom aFundamental "ule o Procedure
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
51/55
=>amples of fundamental rules of procedureidenti%ed "y ad hoc Committees4 the e7ual treatment of the parties$
the ri.ht to "e heard$
an independent and impartial ri"unal the treatment of evidence and "urden of proof$
deli"erations amon. mem"ers of ri"unal1
Some ad hoc Committees have re7uired that thedeparture have a material impact on the outcomeof the award for the annulment to succeed1
Serious Departure rom aFundamental "ule o Procedure (II)
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
52/55
he re7uirement to state reasons is intended toensure that parties can understand the reasonin. ofthe ri"unal ! the reader can understand the factsand law applied "y the ri"unal in comin. to itsconclusion1
GinsuNcientH and Ginade7uateH reasons could result inannulment Soufra"i Case, paras1 6-6A1
GfrivolousH and GcontradictoryH reasons are e7uivalentto no reasons and could ?ustify an annulment *7':Case, para1 ), +locner I, para1 66A1
Failure to State the "easons onwhich the #ward is 6ased
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
53/55
Should a ri"unal fail to address a 7uestion,is this .round of annulment &seriousdeparture from a fundamental rule ofprocedure applica"leE
%uestion
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
54/55
'ron Broches &drafted the ICSID Convention andserved as Secretary-Jeneral of ICSID for thirteenyears4;; *nnulment is an essential but e&ceptional remedy. It
is well understood that the grounds listed in *rticle 5
are the only grounds on which an award may beannulled. ?owe!er, the application of that paragraphplaces a hea!y responsibility on the ad hoc committeeswhich must rule on requests for annulment. 6or e&le,in relation to a Tribunal#s alleged 3e&cess of powers2 they
may ha!e to ma"e 1ne distinctions between failure toapply the applicable law, which is a ground forannulment, and incorrect interpretation of that law, whichis not.
Conclusion
-
7/26/2019 Annulment Proccess of a an ICSID Award
55/55
8ith respect to allegations that a tribunal#s failure todeal with questions submitted to it constitutes aserious departure from a fundamental rule of
procedure, or failure to state the reasons on which theaward is based, they will ha!e to assess their
nature and potential eAect, had they been dealt with,on the tribunal#s award. They are also li"ely to becalled on to gi!e speci1c meaning to such terms as3manifest,2 3serious departure2 and 3fundamentalrule of procedure2 in (udging the admissibility ofclaims for annulment.BB
Conclusion